Cosmologists teach that space inside galaxies and galactic clusters does not expand at all. They reject the scenario in which expansion inside galaxies and galactic clusters does occur but is overcome by gravitational attraction. According to their
models, even the slightest gravitational attraction blocks any expansion:

"Is the space inside, say, a galaxy growing but overcome by the gravitational attraction between the stars? The answer is no. Space within any gravitationally bound system is unaffected by the surrounding expansion." https://youtu.be/bUHZ2k9DYHY?t=356

Sabine Hossenfelder: "The solution of general relativity that describes the expanding universe is a solution on average; it is good only on very large distances. But the solutions that describe galaxies are different - and just don't expand. It's not
that galaxies expand unnoticeably, they just don't. The full solution, then, is both stitched together: Expanding space between non-expanding galaxies...It is only somewhere beyond the scales of galaxy clusters that expansion takes over." https://www.
forbes.com/sites/startswithabang/2017/07/28/most-things-dont-actually-expand-in-an-expanding-universe/

"Expanding space between non-expanding galaxies" (more precisely, between non-expanding galactic clusters) is preposterous per se, and its implications are preposterous as well. Consider, for instance, the famous stretching of light caused by expansion:

"As light travels towards us from the distant galaxies, it is stretched over time by the ever expanding space it is travelling through. The longer it travels, the more the wavelengths are increased (reddened)." https://www.wwu.edu/astro101/a101_hubble_
redshift.shtml

So light is stretched as it travels in the space between galactic clusters, then stretching stops as the light enters a cluster, then stretching continues as the light leaves the cluster, etc. Idiotic, isn't it?

Why do cosmologists apply expansion solutions only to voids where there is no gravitational attraction? Because, if they applied expansion solutions to spaces where objects attract one another gravitationally, observations would immediately disprove the
expansion theory. Here is why:

If expansion is actual inside galaxies and galactic clusters, the competition between expansion and gravitational attraction would distort those cosmic structures - e.g. fringes only weakly bound by gravity would succumb to expansion and fly away. And
the theory, if it assumes that intragalactic expansion does occur, will have to predict distortions.

But no distortions are observed - there is really no expansion inside galaxies and galactic clusters. And cosmologists, without much publicity, have decided to apply the expansion theory only to gravity-free space. Nothing new. Theoretical physics has
been a dishonest ideology since 1905:

"This paper investigates an alternative possibility: that the critics were right and that the success of Einstein's theory in overcoming them was due to its strengths as an ideology rather than as a science. The clock paradox illustrates how relativity
theory does indeed contain inconsistencies that make it scientifically problematic. These same inconsistencies, however, make the theory ideologically powerful...The gatekeepers of professional physics in the universities and research institutes are
disinclined to support or employ anyone who raises problems over the elementary inconsistencies of relativity. A winnowing out process has made it very difficult for critics of Einstein to achieve or maintain professional status. Relativists are then
able to use the argument of authority to discredit these critics. Were relativists to admit that Einstein may have made a series of elementary logical errors, they would be faced with the embarrassing question of why this had not been noticed earlier.
Under these circumstances the marginalisation of antirelativists, unjustified on scientific grounds, is eminently justifiable on grounds of realpolitik. Supporters of relativity theory have protected both the theory and their own reputations by shutting
their opponents out of professional discourse...The triumph of relativity theory represents the triumph of ideology not only in the profession of physics bur also in the philosophy of science." Peter Hayes, The Ideology of Relativity: The Case of the
Clock Paradox https://tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/02691720902741399

Since there is no expansion inside galaxies and galactic clusters, there is no expansion anywhere else.

See more here: https://twitter.com/pentcho_valev

Pentcho Valev

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

Modern 'science' is a religion invented by con-artists and liars to psychologically control the masses.

The inverse square law of light disproves all the cosmological nonsense
taught by the science cult. That one law alone unravels all their lies.

Galaxies do not exist. They are a figment of scientific imagination. The "photos" you think you see from Hubble and Webb are photoshop fantasy.

The celestial objects we see are lights that are close to the earth.
They are electrical plasma lights. They are not trillions, quadrillions, centrillions, septillions of miles away. The inverse square law of light absolutely proves this to be the case. Nothing that far away would be
visible.

The sun is not 93 million miles away. This is a preposterous attempt of
the sun worshipers in power to get people worshiping their sun god. The
inverse square law of light absolutely proves that the sun is not 93
million miles away.

The sun is a electrical plasma light. The solar flares are electrical
plasma arcs. Countless videos and photos show the sun is close and
local, and that the sun creates hot spots on cloud formations, proving
it is a local phenomenon. Just google for 'solar hotspots on clouds' and
see for yourself. The sun is close to earth.

Solar rays always come down spreading from a point source to the
horizon. This could not happen if the sun were far away. All rays from
the sun would always be parallel if it were far away.

The earth does not rotate or orbit. The earth is stationary. The
celestial lights above are actually orbiting the earth. There is no such
thing as 'outer space.' Euclidean space ends above us, and the edge of
some other dimension begins there. We are on the bottom side of a higher dimension, thus our world is referred to as 'the pit' from there, and
the next higher dimension is referred to as 'paradise.' Earth is like
the floor of the higher dimension. "Heaven is my throne, the earth is my footstool."

Science is a fraud. It's all fraud. From the big bang to evolution to
dinosaurs to cosmology it is all a pile of delusional bunk.

Why do they cling to these theories? Because their freemason masters
reject the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob and hate him. Their religion teaches that Jehovah is the devil, and that their solar god of light,
Lucifer, is the real god to be worshiped.

The earth is stationary. The stars are lights that orbit the earth.

If you look up the inverse square law of light, you will quickly see
that the powers that should not be are lying to you about everything.

If the sun were 93 million miles away it would be completely invisible
to the human eye. So little light from it would reach the earth that it
would not even be detectable against the background radiation caused by
a cooking fire.

It's time for you people to man up and reject the Catholic-Freemason
gayop of modern science. God the Father created the heavens and the
earth and he created man and put man in this place.

The Catholics and Freemasons worship Lucifer, the devil, that old
serpent, and the chief principle of their religion is to invent lies and
fables and psyops to deceive the people they rule over.

We have a loving Father in heaven who created us, and has promised that
he will raise us from the dead and give us eternal life. We will have glorified, immortal bodies that cannot die, cannot be injured, cannot
get sick, cannot feel pain because they will be completely
indestructible. We will be glorified like tiny little miniature gods,
having the same kind of power of life that the Creator has, on a much
smaller scale. He is reproducing himself, creating children after his
own image and likeness. That is the point of this fallen world, to grow
men spiritually, in their faith and character, through suffering. Those
who grow can be raised up and glorified.

This hellish world is a test to see who will follow him and trust him,
and obey him. Those who do are accounted worthy of life. Those who hate
him, he is not going to allow to mess it up for everyone else in the
hereafter.

The Freemasons and other Catholic-run secret societies hate the Father
in Heaven and they in their blind ignorance think they can create their
own paradise through human effort. They desire to be worshiped like God
without having his character in their hearts.

Earth is stationary. It is not orbiting anything.

Galaxies are nonsense.

Giant gas-ball stars are satanic nonsense.

God is watching. He is bigger than the visible universe, and completely invisible to human eyes. You can't see him and you won't ever see him.
But you will know him when you are raised up from the dead and clothed
in immortality. It will all make sense then, when you have no more fear,
no more suffering, no more sinful stupidity lowering the power of your intellect to believe in these Freemason fairy tales.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

"Indeed, Wilczek began his lecture by speaking of the profound analogy between materials and vacuum. What our naked senses perceive as empty space turns out to be a riotous environment of virtual particles fluorescing and dying away on extremely small
scales of space and time, as well as fog-like fields and condensates, which permeate all space and dictate the properties of elementary particles. To give an analogy for this perplexing new picture of reality, Wilczek asks us to imagine intelligent fish
in a world surrounded by water. Such creatures would perceive the water surrounding them as their version of empty space or a vacuum. "The big idea I want to convey is simply this: We're like those fish," he said. What our senses perceive as empty space
is better understood as a substance, a material." https://asunow.asu.edu/20170208-finding-nothing-conversation-frank-wilczek

Paul Davies: "This leads to the prediction of vacuum friction: The quantum vacuum can act in a manner reminiscent of a viscous fluid." http://philpapers.org/rec/DAVQVN

"Some physicists, however, suggest that there might be one other cosmic factor that could influence the speed of light: quantum vacuum fluctuation. This theory holds that so-called empty spaces in the Universe aren't actually empty - they're teeming with
particles that are just constantly changing from existent to non-existent states. Quantum fluctuations, therefore, could slow down the speed of light." https://www.sciencealert.com/how-much-do-we-really-know-about-the-speed-of-light

The idea that vacuum slows down light has been largely discussed but only in terms of quantum gravity. The implication that the cosmological (Hubble) redshift might be due to slow speed of light (and therefore the universe is not expanding) is blocked by
crimestop:

"...in some quantum-gravity models, the speed of photons in gamma rays would be affected by the grainy nature of spacetime..." https://fqxi.org/community/articles/display/255

Sabine Hossenfelder: "It's an old story: Quantum fluctuations of space-time might change the travel-time of light. Light of higher frequencies would be a little faster than that of lower frequencies. Or slower, depending on the sign of an unknown
constant. Either way, the spectral colors of light would run apart, or 'disperse' as they say if they don't want you to understand what they say. Such quantum gravitational effects are miniscule, but added up over long distances they can become
observable. Gamma ray bursts are therefore ideal to search for evidence of such an energy-dependent speed of light." http://backreaction.blogspot.fr/2017/01/what-burst-fresh-attempt-to-see-space.html

George Orwell: "Crimestop means the faculty of stopping short, as though by instinct, at the threshold of any dangerous thought. It includes the power of not grasping analogies, of failing to perceive logical errors, of misunderstanding the simplest
arguments if they are inimical to Ingsoc, and of being bored or repelled by any train of thought which is capable of leading in a heretical direction. Crimestop, in short, means protective stupidity."

More here: https://twitter.com/pentcho_valev

Pentcho Valev

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

"You build these machines not to confirm the paradigm, but to break it," said JWST scientist Mark McCaughrean, at the European Space Agency. "You just don't know how it will break." As light from a very distant galaxy travels across the cosmic abyss, it
is stretched by the expansion of the universe." https://youtu.be/fgby5l_KJto?t=255

Here is how the paradigm will break. Replace

"it is stretched by the expansion of the universe"

with

"it is slowed down by vacuum 'friction', in a non-expanding universe".

See more: https://twitter.com/pentcho_valev

Pentcho Valev

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)