i am searching an astronomer or similar ... dark matter begins to
live when 120 years ago somebody looks the anomal rotation of the
galaxies... why he gave not the reason to the dark/dead stars ?
On 22/03/2023 23:47, saverio donnini wrote:
i am searching an astronomer or similar ... dark matter begins to
live when 120 years ago somebody looks the anomal rotation of the
galaxies... why he gave not the reason to the dark/dead stars ?
The missing mass as it was first called is needed to prevent galaxies
from flying apart since their rotation speed allows you to determine the >minimum mass inside the orbit to prevent that happening.
When they originally named it dark matter (and even up until the 1980's)
it could still have been any non-luminous normal matter. Astrophysicists
with a sense of humour suggested missing biros and chair legs.
However, modern observations from radio through microwave terahertz and
right up to gamma rays now mean that it is impossible to hide ordinary
matter that way. It would show up as illuminated by the starlight of a
galaxy if it were able to interact with electromagnetic radiation.
The observational data rule out normal matter as a solution.
i am searching an astronomer or similar ... dark matter begins to live when 120 years ago somebody looks the anomal rotation of the galaxies... why he gave not the reason to the dark/dead stars ?
On a sunny day (Thu, 23 Mar 2023 09:38:15 +0000) it happened Martin Brown
<':
The simple answer is then: Galaxies ARE flying apart.
You see something rotating in the center with often 2 'arms' spitting out matter like a garden sprinkler,
but not water but stars and othter matter: https://esahubble.org/images/archive/category/galaxies/
PS
what plays the role of the air friction in that comparision is the Le Sage particles:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Le_Sage%27s_theory_of_gravitation#
So, and it seems some measured that graffiti[9999] moves at the speed of light
so it may well be that those LS particles are also the carrier of EM radiation.
Or maybe the state of those particles is.
Keep it simple.
[9999] I know
Beware of mamaticians doing a divide by zero.
NeinStein's theory is NO GOOD without a mechanism, Le Sage gives us a mechanism.
On Thursday, 23 March 2023 at 10:56:40 UTC, Jan Panteltje wrote:.. in our galaxy seems to be a lack of matter 3 times the probable observed matter ..but there are example where the lack is 90 times the observed or more .. so problem is exsisting ..
On a sunny day (Thu, 23 Mar 2023 09:38:15 +0000) it happened Martin Brown <':
The simple answer is then: Galaxies ARE flying apart.
You see something rotating in the center with often 2 'arms' spitting out matter like a garden sprinkler,
but not water but stars and othter matter: https://esahubble.org/images/archive/category/galaxies/
PS
what plays the role of the air friction in that comparision is the Le Sage particles:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Le_Sage%27s_theory_of_gravitation#
So, and it seems some measured that graffiti[9999] moves at the speed of light
so it may well be that those LS particles are also the carrier of EM radiation.
Or maybe the state of those particles is.
Maybe...Waves.
Not a bad solution. Considering it deals with the criticisms of Push
gravity from Kelvin, Maxwell etc. Because no heat or particles are stored. And no extra growing mass or collisions are necessary. Nor a need for lattices to hold atom together. And finally we can see precedence for wave atoms
in many observations of water, sound and emr. Where standing waves etc concentrate wave energy to constructively interfere and essentially create nodal points of increased energy with frequency and wavelength properties. Exactly as all observations of atoms confirm (Ie atomic resonance.)
One can even use Lesage wave gravity to explain GPS. Because atoms
display resonant properties. & Can best be modelled as resonating systems. And resonating systems are observed to change resonant frequencies
when an external force is applied.Like gravity.
And the different resonant frequencies of atomic clocks at different altitudes
confirm this prediction by LeSage gravity.
No need for Relativistic fantasies.
Keep it simple.
[9999] I know
Beware of mamaticians doing a divide by zero.
NeinStein's theory is NO GOOD without a mechanism, Le Sage gives us a mechanism.
.. in our galaxy seems to be a lack of matter 3 times the probable observed=
matter ..but there are example where the lack is 90 times the observed or =
more .. so problem is exsisting ..
.. the Hubble theleskope sais surprisingly also that there are 50% of (impo= >ssible) negative parallaxes but the news is also today neglected because no= >t classificable (????)... see my site www.leonardomuseum.blogspot.com in '= >Laboratorio' a dedicated section ..
Il giorno giovedì 23 marzo 2023 alle 14:26:16 UTC+1 Lou ha scritto:I am not familiar until now with your point about “ negative” parallax. But, a brief look at this subject of negative parallax seems to suggest
On Thursday, 23 March 2023 at 10:56:40 UTC, Jan Panteltje wrote:
On a sunny day (Thu, 23 Mar 2023 09:38:15 +0000) it happened Martin Brown
<':
The simple answer is then: Galaxies ARE flying apart.
You see something rotating in the center with often 2 'arms' spitting out matter like a garden sprinkler,
but not water but stars and othter matter: https://esahubble.org/images/archive/category/galaxies/
PS
what plays the role of the air friction in that comparision is the Le Sage particles:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Le_Sage%27s_theory_of_gravitation#
So, and it seems some measured that graffiti[9999] moves at the speed of light
so it may well be that those LS particles are also the carrier of EM radiation.
Or maybe the state of those particles is.
Maybe...Waves.
Not a bad solution. Considering it deals with the criticisms of Push gravity from Kelvin, Maxwell etc. Because no heat or particles are stored. And no extra growing mass or collisions are necessary. Nor a need for lattices to hold atom together. And finally we can see precedence for wave atoms
in many observations of water, sound and emr. Where standing waves etc concentrate wave energy to constructively interfere and essentially create nodal points of increased energy with frequency and wavelength properties. Exactly as all observations of atoms confirm (Ie atomic resonance.)
One can even use Lesage wave gravity to explain GPS. Because atoms
display resonant properties. & Can best be modelled as resonating systems. And resonating systems are observed to change resonant frequencies
when an external force is applied.Like gravity.
And the different resonant frequencies of atomic clocks at different altitudes
confirm this prediction by LeSage gravity.
No need for Relativistic fantasies.
Keep it simple.
[9999] I know
Beware of mamaticians doing a divide by zero.
.. in our galaxy seems to be a lack of matter 3 times the probable observed matter ..but there are example where the lack is 90 times the observed or more .. so problem is exsisting ..NeinStein's theory is NO GOOD without a mechanism, Le Sage gives us a mechanism.
.. the Hubble theleskope sais surprisingly also that there are 50% of (impossible) negative parallaxes but the news is also today neglected because not classificable (????)...
On Saturday, 25 March 2023 at 23:38:06 UTC, saverio donnini wrote:thanks for your anwer ... can i know where you get your informations ?
Il giorno giovedì 23 marzo 2023 alle 14:26:16 UTC+1 Lou ha scritto:
On Thursday, 23 March 2023 at 10:56:40 UTC, Jan Panteltje wrote:
On a sunny day (Thu, 23 Mar 2023 09:38:15 +0000) it happened Martin Brown
<':
The simple answer is then: Galaxies ARE flying apart.
You see something rotating in the center with often 2 'arms' spitting out matter like a garden sprinkler,
but not water but stars and othter matter: https://esahubble.org/images/archive/category/galaxies/
PS
what plays the role of the air friction in that comparision is the Le Sage particles:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Le_Sage%27s_theory_of_gravitation#
So, and it seems some measured that graffiti[9999] moves at the speed of light
so it may well be that those LS particles are also the carrier of EM radiation.
Or maybe the state of those particles is.
Maybe...Waves.
Not a bad solution. Considering it deals with the criticisms of Push gravity from Kelvin, Maxwell etc. Because no heat or particles are stored.
And no extra growing mass or collisions are necessary. Nor a need for lattices to hold atom together. And finally we can see precedence for wave atoms
in many observations of water, sound and emr. Where standing waves etc concentrate wave energy to constructively interfere and essentially create
nodal points of increased energy with frequency and wavelength properties.
Exactly as all observations of atoms confirm (Ie atomic resonance.)
One can even use Lesage wave gravity to explain GPS. Because atoms display resonant properties. & Can best be modelled as resonating systems.
And resonating systems are observed to change resonant frequencies
when an external force is applied.Like gravity.
And the different resonant frequencies of atomic clocks at different altitudes
confirm this prediction by LeSage gravity.
No need for Relativistic fantasies.
Keep it simple.
[9999] I know
Beware of mamaticians doing a divide by zero.
I am not familiar until now with your point about “ negative” parallax. But, a brief look at this subject of negative parallax seems to suggest.. in our galaxy seems to be a lack of matter 3 times the probable observed matter ..but there are example where the lack is 90 times the observed or more .. so problem is exsisting ..NeinStein's theory is NO GOOD without a mechanism, Le Sage gives us a mechanism.
.. the Hubble theleskope sais surprisingly also that there are 50% of (impossible) negative parallaxes but the news is also today neglected because not classificable (????)...
that as we don’t know which stars of two compared are closest
then for all star data, 1/4 (A)will always appear to have negative,
& 1/4 positive (B) and 1/2 no parallax.
It sounds like for every star x observed in the catalogue another nearby star y is used as background reference to calculate the parallax for x.
So it’s not that 1/4 stars have negative parallax. It’s because that in the
Negative quarter sample the assumed background reference star y
is actually nearer to us than x.
Which makes sense seeing as statistically if you compare any 2 stars
in close proximity in the sky field to each other than 1/2 will be the
more distant. But you don’t know which half.
Hopefully that makes sense.
see my site www.leonardomuseum.blogspot.com in 'Laboratorio' a dedicated section ..
Il giorno domenica 26 marzo 2023 alle 11:49:29 UTC+2 Lou ha scritto:I typed in negative parallax stars Gaia into google and got a variety
On Saturday, 25 March 2023 at 23:38:06 UTC, saverio donnini wrote:
Il giorno giovedì 23 marzo 2023 alle 14:26:16 UTC+1 Lou ha scritto:
On Thursday, 23 March 2023 at 10:56:40 UTC, Jan Panteltje wrote:
On a sunny day (Thu, 23 Mar 2023 09:38:15 +0000) it happened Martin Brown
<':
The simple answer is then: Galaxies ARE flying apart.
You see something rotating in the center with often 2 'arms' spitting out matter like a garden sprinkler,
but not water but stars and othter matter: https://esahubble.org/images/archive/category/galaxies/
PS
what plays the role of the air friction in that comparision is the Le Sage particles:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Le_Sage%27s_theory_of_gravitation#
So, and it seems some measured that graffiti[9999] moves at the speed of light
so it may well be that those LS particles are also the carrier of EM radiation.
Or maybe the state of those particles is.
Maybe...Waves.
Not a bad solution. Considering it deals with the criticisms of Push gravity from Kelvin, Maxwell etc. Because no heat or particles are stored.
And no extra growing mass or collisions are necessary. Nor a need for lattices to hold atom together. And finally we can see precedence for wave atoms
in many observations of water, sound and emr. Where standing waves etc concentrate wave energy to constructively interfere and essentially create
nodal points of increased energy with frequency and wavelength properties.
Exactly as all observations of atoms confirm (Ie atomic resonance.) One can even use Lesage wave gravity to explain GPS. Because atoms display resonant properties. & Can best be modelled as resonating systems.
And resonating systems are observed to change resonant frequencies when an external force is applied.Like gravity.
And the different resonant frequencies of atomic clocks at different altitudes
confirm this prediction by LeSage gravity.
No need for Relativistic fantasies.
Keep it simple.
[9999] I know
Beware of mamaticians doing a divide by zero.
thanks for your anwer ... can i know where you get your informations ?I am not familiar until now with your point about “ negative” parallax... in our galaxy seems to be a lack of matter 3 times the probable observed matter ..but there are example where the lack is 90 times the observed or more .. so problem is exsisting ..NeinStein's theory is NO GOOD without a mechanism, Le Sage gives us a mechanism.
.. the Hubble theleskope sais surprisingly also that there are 50% of (impossible) negative parallaxes but the news is also today neglected because not classificable (????)...
But, a brief look at this subject of negative parallax seems to suggest that as we don’t know which stars of two compared are closest
then for all star data, 1/4 (A)will always appear to have negative,
& 1/4 positive (B) and 1/2 no parallax.
It sounds like for every star x observed in the catalogue another nearby star y is used as background reference to calculate the parallax for x.
So it’s not that 1/4 stars have negative parallax. It’s because that in the
Negative quarter sample the assumed background reference star y
is actually nearer to us than x.
Which makes sense seeing as statistically if you compare any 2 stars
in close proximity in the sky field to each other than 1/2 will be the more distant. But you don’t know which half.
Hopefully that makes sense.
see my site www.leonardomuseum.blogspot.com in 'Laboratorio' a dedicated section ..
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 546 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 03:05:22 |
| Calls: | 10,386 |
| Calls today: | 1 |
| Files: | 14,057 |
| Messages: | 6,416,590 |