On Wednesday, 26 April 2023 at 05:27:45 UTC+1, Jan Panteltje wrote:
Astrophysicists reveal the nature of dark matter through the study of crinkles in spacetime
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2023/04/230425111243.htm
So not heavy - but ultralight particles explain 'dark matter'
My take:
This sort of indicates the Le Sage model is the one
One step further:
IF the EM radiation (light for example) is a state
of the Le Sage particle, then we have quantum coupling explained too.
A Le Sage particle passes through some particle, is modified, (phase? rotation?)
lightime later then hits other particle that adapts to that phase... Coupling explained.
Dark Matter. Dreamed up by theorists to account for the fact that
Newton’s r^2 couldnt account for stellar velocities in galaxies.
Of course it’s Newton’s formula which needs revising.
He incorrectly assumed the total mass of the system can be put
at the Center. Total nonsense of course. It was OK for Newton
when planets orbits were being calculated because the sun
has almost all the mass. But it noticeably breaks down at close orbits (Mercury) and in galaxies where the mass is more evenly distributed
throughout the disc. Calculate galaxy rotation curves by only
including the mass inside each stars orbit around the galaxy core
and you find that the calculations DO match the relatively
similar velocities of stars through out the disc orbiting the galaxy.
In other words you don’t need dark matter at all.
That’s why they couldn’t find the big particles. Dark matter
is a fantasy.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)