• The Best Gleason/AE map explanation on YouTube

    From Flat Earth Banjo@21:1/5 to All on Sun Aug 18 14:10:10 2024
    XPost: alt.astronomy, alt.uk.misc.flat-earth

    The Best Gleason/AE map explanation on YouTube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iR5YIZClxoo

    Credits to this video goes to: IMUNE2BS. nLike and Subscribe here: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UClHUwQPkEbrqUyUOOuA2LlA

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Kualinar@21:1/5 to All on Sun Aug 18 13:58:41 2024
    XPost: alt.astronomy, alt.uk.misc.flat-earth

    Le 2024-08-18 à 10:10, Flat Earth Banjo a écrit :
    The Best Gleason/AE map explanation on YouTube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iRSY1ZCIxoo


    The Gleason map is a PROJECTION of the globe upon a flat surface. It's
    clearly stated on the map itself.
    It's an equiangular projection centred around the North Pole. It's
    centre can be placed ANYWHERE.
    It's purpose was to show the, at the time new, concept of Time Zones.

    As for that IMUNE2BS guy... He's just another flatard who never stop
    spewing BS and went MIA about 3 years ago. Maybe he didn't support being
    proved wrong all the time...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Original Science Gangster@21:1/5 to Kualinar on Tue Sep 3 23:51:40 2024
    XPost: alt.astronomy, alt.uk.misc.flat-earth

    On Sun, 18 Aug 2024 13:58:41 -0400
    Kualinar <kuakinar@videotron.ca> wrote:

    Le 2024-08-18 à 10:10, Flat Earth Banjo a écrit :
    The Best Gleason/AE map explanation on YouTube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iRSY1ZCIxoo


    The Gleason map is a PROJECTION of the globe upon a flat surface.

    This is a bald-face lie and pure fiction. You just invented this fake
    fact out of thin air. You also misrepresent what 'projection'
    means in cartography. A projection is the transfer of an image of
    something real onto a surface.

    Gleason's map states at the very top in BIG letters: "On the projection
    of J.S. Christopher ... scientifically and practically correct, AS IT
    IS."

    J.S. Christopher was a flat earther. Don't be a lazy bones and go look
    it up. It looks like you did no homework before you started to spout off
    your talking points. By calling his flat earth map a globe projection
    you made a huge misstep that annihilates credibility.

    Alexander Gleason himself wrote in his book, titled, "Is the Bible
    From Heaven? Is the Earth a Globe", that his 1892 map is a
    scientifically accurate map that proves the earth is flat. Alexander
    Gleason, the creator of this map, was a well-known flat earther. He did
    NOT make a globe projection onto a flat map. The distances on the
    Gleason flat map are ACCURATE. They have been shown to be accurate
    repeatedly by many tests. The distances on a globe are not accurate.
    The distances on a globe are so inaccurate that using an actual globe
    for navigation is utterly impossible and would cause disaster or death.

    Gleason, an avowed flat earther, reproduced and improved a map made
    first by another flat earther (J.S. Christopher), and you make the claim
    that it is a projection of the globe. Talk about brazen deceit! You like
    to call people stupid, but we can see who is the stupid one here. Were
    you not such an insulting liar we could use gentle language. But you
    deserve ridicule, lazy bones.

    It's clearly stated on the map itself.

    No, the map itself says exactly the opposite. Right at the top of the
    Gleason map it states in BIG letters, based upon the J.S. Christopher projection:

    "projection of J. S. Christopher, Modern College, Blackheath, England"

    J.S. Christopher was also a well-known flat earther and was a promoter
    of the Zetetic Astronomy of flat-earther Samuel Rowbotham:

    "At some time in life Christopher got hooked on Samual Birley
    Rowbotham's 'Zetetic Astronomy'. This was a modern-day flat-earth
    theory according to which the Earth is a circular plane
    centered on the North Pole ..."

    Christopher's projection was a flat earth map, not a projection of a
    globe. Alexander Gleason reiterated this on the verso of the map, and
    in his book. {Buffalo Commercial (Buffalo, NY): 6, 24 Mar. 1893.}

    You didn't know that the map had text on the reverse side alluding to
    the fact that it is a flat earth map. You see the difference between
    you and 'flerfs' is that you regurgitate propaganda and make things up,
    while 'flerfs' actually do research and experiments. And you would call yourself a, 'scientist' when what you do is ideological gate-keeping,
    not science.

    You don't understand what a 'projection' is. A map 'projection' is
    simply the 'projection' of terrain onto a surface. In your ignorance
    your called it a 'projection of the globe', a common false trope used
    by heliocentrists. And you conveniently omitted the fact that both
    designers of this map were die-hard flat earthers who wrote books about
    their flat earth and cosmological beliefs!

    Just because some cartographers have claimed that *their* azimuth
    projections are a 'globe' projection does not make it so with this map.
    It has already been mathematically proven that it is IMPOSSIBLE to
    project a globe accurately onto a flat surface. Yet the distances and
    angles on Gleason's map are ACCURATE and measure up to practical
    reality, which would be IMPOSSIBLE if the earth were a globe.

    The USGS, UN, and many other government agencies use for their official
    logos a map layout inspired by two flat earthers!

    It's an equiangular projection centred around the North Pole. It's
    centre can be placed ANYWHERE.

    Not according to Gleason or Christopher, who both contended that the
    map is 'scientifically and practically correct, as it is.' That is
    written right at the top of the map. Did you even look at the map?

    Distances are not correct on off-center equiangular maps. Distances can
    only be correct if the locus or center is the correct distance
    from every other point. Any skew introduces and propagates distance
    errors.

    The distances are correct on Gleason's map, proving the North Pole is
    the center and the antarctic is not a point at a ball-bottom but rather
    a ring around the whole plain. Your oversimplification of the matter
    shows your ignorance disguised as pretended knowledge. You think you
    are smarter, but just proved yourself dumber.

    It's purpose was to show the, at the time new, concept of Time Zones.

    No, its purpose was to render a correct map of the earth's surface with
    correct distances. Time zones are a bonus, not the purpose. The time
    zones and the time zone calcualator work very well on the flat map,
    whereas they DO NOT work well using a globe ruler.

    As for that IMUNE2BS guy... He's just another flatard who never stop
    spewing BS and went MIA about 3 years ago. Maybe he didn't support
    being proved wrong all the time...

    This is just more bile and name-calling with no probitive, scientific,
    or civil purpose. It is YOU who just got proved wrong on several points.

    Gleason, the author of the map by his name, was a well-known flat
    earther. You intentionally lied about his map. You claimed it was a
    globe projected onto a flat paper, whereas Gleason the map maker claims
    that it is a true and accurate map of the flat earth. Had you actually
    studied the map in detail you would have avoided proving yourself a
    liar.

    You have proven yourself to be only one of two possibilities:

    A monumental dunce and moron, or, an occult shill retard.

    You NASA clowns here on Usenet wouldn't know what the scientific method
    was if it bit your face. All you do is regurgitate propaganda and
    talking points in the misguided belief that you can re-define reality
    according to your own whims. You can't even get accurate facts about a
    map or its author when they are right there on the top margin of the
    map and easily found in Google. You use name-calling and belittling to
    frighten people away from inquiring into the flat earth matter. NASA is
    a criminal cartel that has stolen and laundered countless billions of
    taxpayer money for its space program fraud. No wonder they have an army
    of shills trying to cover their asses!

    The earth is flat. The celesial lights move over the face of the earth
    just as your eyes tell you. Nobody ever landed on the moon.
    Outer space is fake, made in a Hollywood basement. Heliocentrism is the religion of the satanic occult. You are their slave.

    The God of the Bible is real, the true Almight Creator of heaven and
    earth. Your heliocentric lie is rebellion against him. You will not
    win. You're all going to be sentenced to cosmic prison!

    Satan (Apollo) is weak. All he has is lies and mind poison. This is why
    the official NASA logo has a forked snake tongue. The truth defeats your father's insanity. You want to force people to live in your illusion.
    Misery loves company. We reject your offer of illusion. God Almighty
    will punish you for forcing that illusion onto innocent children.

    Get your crayons and draw me a globe little glerfer goblin!

    Fun fact: 7% of Brazilians know that the earth is flat.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Kualinar@21:1/5 to All on Wed Sep 4 08:55:08 2024
    XPost: alt.astronomy, alt.uk.misc.flat-earth

    Le 2024-09-03 à 19:51, Original Science Gangster a écrit :
    On Sun, 18 Aug 2024 13:58:41 -0400
    Kualinar <kuakinar@videotron.ca> wrote:

    Le 2024-08-18 à 10:10, Flat Earth Banjo a écrit :
    The Best Gleason/AE map explanation on YouTube
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iRSY1ZCIxoo


    The Gleason map is a PROJECTION of the globe upon a flat surface.

    This is a bald-face lie and pure fiction. You just invented this fake
    fact out of thin air. You also misrepresent what 'projection'
    means in cartography. A projection is the transfer of an image of
    something real onto a surface.
    That mean that the Gleason's map IS a projection.
    It's the transfer of the very real globe Earth onto a flat surface.
    You are still a flatard.

    Gleason's map states at the very top in BIG letters: "On the projection
    of J.S. Christopher ... scientifically and practically correct, AS IT
    IS."
    Who made the projection don't mater. It's still a projection of the
    globe Earth onto a flat surface.
    You continue to support the fact that flatards lie.

    J.S. Christopher was a flat earther. Don't be a lazy bones and go look
    it up. It looks like you did no homework before you started to spout off
    your talking points. By calling his flat earth map a globe projection
    you made a huge misstep that annihilates credibility.
    I call it what it is. You lie about reality.

    Alexander Gleason himself wrote in his book, titled, "Is the Bible
    From Heaven? Is the Earth a Globe", that his 1892 map is a
    scientifically accurate map that proves the earth is flat. Alexander
    Gleason, the creator of this map, was a well-known flat earther. He did
    NOT make a globe projection onto a flat map. The distances on the
    Gleason flat map are ACCURATE. They have been shown to be accurate
    repeatedly by many tests. The distances on a globe are not accurate.
    The distances on a globe are so inaccurate that using an actual globe
    for navigation is utterly impossible and would cause disaster or death.
    Here, it's YOU who lies.
    You lie by claiming that Gleason was a flatard.
    The distances on the Gleason map are highly INACCURATE, with the
    inaccuracy steadily increasing as you go South.
    Fact : ALL navigation is done using spherical geometry.

    Gleason, an avowed flat earther, reproduced and improved a map made
    first by another flat earther (J.S. Christopher), and you make the claim
    that it is a projection of the globe. Talk about brazen deceit! You like
    to call people stupid, but we can see who is the stupid one here. Were
    you not such an insulting liar we could use gentle language. But you
    deserve ridicule, lazy bones.
    Stop lying, Gleason was NOT a flatard. The Gleason's map IS a projection
    of the globe Earth upon a flat surface.
    YOU are the deceitful one.

    It's clearly stated on the map itself.

    No, the map itself says exactly the opposite. Right at the top of the
    Gleason map it states in BIG letters, based upon the J.S. Christopher projection:

    "projection of J. S. Christopher, Modern College, Blackheath, England"
    IF the Earth was indeed flat, then, there would have been ZERO need to
    use any form of projection. It would have been nothing but a scalling
    factor.
    You use a projection when you transition from one geometry to another.
    Flat to flat is NOT a projection.

    J.S. Christopher was also a well-known flat earther and was a promoter
    of the Zetetic Astronomy of flat-earther Samuel Rowbotham:
    The «Zetetic astronomy» is a load of bull shit.
    There is ONE point where I agree with you : Samuel Rowbotham REALLY way
    a flatard.

    "At some time in life Christopher got hooked on Samual Birley
    Rowbotham's 'Zetetic Astronomy'. This was a modern-day flat-earth
    theory according to which the Earth is a circular plane
    centered on the North Pole ..."
    That's NOT a theory, but a baseless claim that contradict reality.

    Christopher's projection was a flat earth map, not a projection of a
    globe. Alexander Gleason reiterated this on the verso of the map, and
    in his book. {Buffalo Commercial (Buffalo, NY): 6, 24 Mar. 1893.}
    ALL maps are projections of the globe.

    You didn't know that the map had text on the reverse side alluding to
    the fact that it is a flat earth map. You see the difference between
    you and 'flerfs' is that you regurgitate propaganda and make things up,
    while 'flerfs' actually do research and experiments. And you would call yourself a, 'scientist' when what you do is ideological gate-keeping,
    not science.
    The ONLY «research» done by flatards is to watch YouTube videos from
    other flatards. Any time a flatard made an actual observation, the
    observation support the globe, not the holy wafer.

    You don't understand what a 'projection' is. A map 'projection' is
    simply the 'projection' of terrain onto a surface. In your ignorance
    your called it a 'projection of the globe', a common false trope used
    by heliocentrists. And you conveniently omitted the fact that both
    designers of this map were die-hard flat earthers who wrote books about
    their flat earth and cosmological beliefs!
    Can you stop your lies ?

    Just because some cartographers have claimed that *their* azimuth
    projections are a 'globe' projection does not make it so with this map.
    It has already been mathematically proven that it is IMPOSSIBLE to
    project a globe accurately onto a flat surface. Yet the distances and
    angles on Gleason's map are ACCURATE and measure up to practical
    reality, which would be IMPOSSIBLE if the earth were a globe.
    Again, ALL maps are projection of the globe, or part of the globe, onto
    a flat surface.
    The distances on the Gleason map are NOT accurate. The angles are not
    accurate.

    The USGS, UN, and many other government agencies use for their official
    logos a map layout inspired by two flat earthers!
    Not at all.

    It's an equiangular projection centred around the North Pole. It's
    centre can be placed ANYWHERE.

    Not according to Gleason or Christopher, who both contended that the
    map is 'scientifically and practically correct, as it is.' That is
    written right at the top of the map. Did you even look at the map?
    I did look at the Gleason map. It clearly state that it's a projection,
    and, it the Earth was flat, there would be NO need for a projection.

    Distances are not correct on off-center equiangular maps. Distances can
    only be correct if the locus or center is the correct distance
    from every other point. Any skew introduces and propagates distance
    errors.
    Not at all. It just change the amplitude and direction of the distortion.

    The distances are correct on Gleason's map, proving the North Pole is
    the center and the antarctic is not a point at a ball-bottom but rather
    a ring around the whole plain. Your oversimplification of the matter
    shows your ignorance disguised as pretended knowledge. You think you
    are smarter, but just proved yourself dumber.
    Again, the distances are NOT correct in ANY direction other that
    straight North-South direction. ALL other distances are inaccurate.
    The angles are ONLY correct relative to the centre point. ALL the other
    angles are inaccurate.

    It's purpose was to show the, at the time new, concept of Time Zones.

    No, its purpose was to render a correct map of the earth's surface with correct distances. Time zones are a bonus, not the purpose. The time
    zones and the time zone calcualator work very well on the flat map,
    whereas they DO NOT work well using a globe ruler.
    Lies, lies and more lies from you.

    Fun fact: 7% of Brazilians know that the earth is flat.

    Correction : Some Brazilians BELIEVE that the Earth is flat, and are
    totally wrong about it.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)