The Best Gleason/AE map explanation on YouTube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iRSY1ZCIxoo
Le 2024-08-18 à 10:10, Flat Earth Banjo a écrit :
The Best Gleason/AE map explanation on YouTube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iRSY1ZCIxoo
The Gleason map is a PROJECTION of the globe upon a flat surface.
It's clearly stated on the map itself.
It's an equiangular projection centred around the North Pole. It's
centre can be placed ANYWHERE.
It's purpose was to show the, at the time new, concept of Time Zones.
As for that IMUNE2BS guy... He's just another flatard who never stop
spewing BS and went MIA about 3 years ago. Maybe he didn't support
being proved wrong all the time...
On Sun, 18 Aug 2024 13:58:41 -0400That mean that the Gleason's map IS a projection.
Kualinar <kuakinar@videotron.ca> wrote:
Le 2024-08-18 à 10:10, Flat Earth Banjo a écrit :
The Best Gleason/AE map explanation on YouTube
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iRSY1ZCIxoo
The Gleason map is a PROJECTION of the globe upon a flat surface.
This is a bald-face lie and pure fiction. You just invented this fake
fact out of thin air. You also misrepresent what 'projection'
means in cartography. A projection is the transfer of an image of
something real onto a surface.
Gleason's map states at the very top in BIG letters: "On the projectionWho made the projection don't mater. It's still a projection of the
of J.S. Christopher ... scientifically and practically correct, AS IT
IS."
J.S. Christopher was a flat earther. Don't be a lazy bones and go lookI call it what it is. You lie about reality.
it up. It looks like you did no homework before you started to spout off
your talking points. By calling his flat earth map a globe projection
you made a huge misstep that annihilates credibility.
Alexander Gleason himself wrote in his book, titled, "Is the BibleHere, it's YOU who lies.
From Heaven? Is the Earth a Globe", that his 1892 map is a
scientifically accurate map that proves the earth is flat. Alexander
Gleason, the creator of this map, was a well-known flat earther. He did
NOT make a globe projection onto a flat map. The distances on the
Gleason flat map are ACCURATE. They have been shown to be accurate
repeatedly by many tests. The distances on a globe are not accurate.
The distances on a globe are so inaccurate that using an actual globe
for navigation is utterly impossible and would cause disaster or death.
Gleason, an avowed flat earther, reproduced and improved a map madeStop lying, Gleason was NOT a flatard. The Gleason's map IS a projection
first by another flat earther (J.S. Christopher), and you make the claim
that it is a projection of the globe. Talk about brazen deceit! You like
to call people stupid, but we can see who is the stupid one here. Were
you not such an insulting liar we could use gentle language. But you
deserve ridicule, lazy bones.
IF the Earth was indeed flat, then, there would have been ZERO need toIt's clearly stated on the map itself.
No, the map itself says exactly the opposite. Right at the top of the
Gleason map it states in BIG letters, based upon the J.S. Christopher projection:
"projection of J. S. Christopher, Modern College, Blackheath, England"
J.S. Christopher was also a well-known flat earther and was a promoterThe «Zetetic astronomy» is a load of bull shit.
of the Zetetic Astronomy of flat-earther Samuel Rowbotham:
"At some time in life Christopher got hooked on Samual BirleyThat's NOT a theory, but a baseless claim that contradict reality.
Rowbotham's 'Zetetic Astronomy'. This was a modern-day flat-earth
theory according to which the Earth is a circular plane
centered on the North Pole ..."
Christopher's projection was a flat earth map, not a projection of aALL maps are projections of the globe.
globe. Alexander Gleason reiterated this on the verso of the map, and
in his book. {Buffalo Commercial (Buffalo, NY): 6, 24 Mar. 1893.}
You didn't know that the map had text on the reverse side alluding toThe ONLY «research» done by flatards is to watch YouTube videos from
the fact that it is a flat earth map. You see the difference between
you and 'flerfs' is that you regurgitate propaganda and make things up,
while 'flerfs' actually do research and experiments. And you would call yourself a, 'scientist' when what you do is ideological gate-keeping,
not science.
You don't understand what a 'projection' is. A map 'projection' isCan you stop your lies ?
simply the 'projection' of terrain onto a surface. In your ignorance
your called it a 'projection of the globe', a common false trope used
by heliocentrists. And you conveniently omitted the fact that both
designers of this map were die-hard flat earthers who wrote books about
their flat earth and cosmological beliefs!
Just because some cartographers have claimed that *their* azimuthAgain, ALL maps are projection of the globe, or part of the globe, onto
projections are a 'globe' projection does not make it so with this map.
It has already been mathematically proven that it is IMPOSSIBLE to
project a globe accurately onto a flat surface. Yet the distances and
angles on Gleason's map are ACCURATE and measure up to practical
reality, which would be IMPOSSIBLE if the earth were a globe.
The USGS, UN, and many other government agencies use for their officialNot at all.
logos a map layout inspired by two flat earthers!
I did look at the Gleason map. It clearly state that it's a projection,It's an equiangular projection centred around the North Pole. It's
centre can be placed ANYWHERE.
Not according to Gleason or Christopher, who both contended that the
map is 'scientifically and practically correct, as it is.' That is
written right at the top of the map. Did you even look at the map?
Distances are not correct on off-center equiangular maps. Distances canNot at all. It just change the amplitude and direction of the distortion.
only be correct if the locus or center is the correct distance
from every other point. Any skew introduces and propagates distance
errors.
The distances are correct on Gleason's map, proving the North Pole isAgain, the distances are NOT correct in ANY direction other that
the center and the antarctic is not a point at a ball-bottom but rather
a ring around the whole plain. Your oversimplification of the matter
shows your ignorance disguised as pretended knowledge. You think you
are smarter, but just proved yourself dumber.
Lies, lies and more lies from you.It's purpose was to show the, at the time new, concept of Time Zones.
No, its purpose was to render a correct map of the earth's surface with correct distances. Time zones are a bonus, not the purpose. The time
zones and the time zone calcualator work very well on the flat map,
whereas they DO NOT work well using a globe ruler.
Fun fact: 7% of Brazilians know that the earth is flat.
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 546 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 51:54:04 |
Calls: | 10,397 |
Calls today: | 5 |
Files: | 14,067 |
Messages: | 6,417,345 |
Posted today: | 1 |