On Friday, 4 February 2022 at 05:42:15 UTC, jacob wrote:
Science advances by testing your ideas against reality. This means,
if you have some ideas, make a prediction. If it works, your ideas
are maybe right. If it doesn't they are wrong.

OK

I have been arguing in this group for several years now, that there
is no big bang and the universe goes on forever. I have presented
some hints at that based on some observations: galaxies 400 Million
years after the supposed bang, old galaxies at 700 million years,
and so on. If you google with my name and the name of this group
you will find all my posts.

A star that was older than the universe that was later "reexamined"
to fit into the current theory.

Anyway, if there was no big bang, JWST will see... nothing special.
More and more galaxies, as it be able to see. It will NOT see any
"dark ages", nor it will see any "first stars" etc. Just more of
the same: more galaxies, more spirals, ellipticals, etc. And they
will go on as far as JWST will be able to see. There will be no
limit, no change.

We are now 6 months away from a confirmation that the big bang never happened.

Unfortunately the Big Bangers have a get out of jail clause.
The closer it gets to the “beginning” the more the redshift
increases for an expanding model. Look at this chart: http://www.earlyearthcentral.com/galaxy_page.html
Notice Hubble now can see to z=11. Approximately 400
million years after the “beginning”.
And JWST apparently will see to z=15. Which on the graph is
a tiny bit less than 300 billion age. BUT,..Until recently BBtheory
said reionization didn’t start till 400billion.
However Hubble saw a galaxy at 400 billion and forced a
change of theory.
Now the BB Theorists say re ionisation started at 200 Billion
age. Allowing them to pretend that by z=11 ( 400 billion age)
galaxies observed by Hubble were still possible under the BBT.😂
However if at JWST z=15 limit ( 300 billion age) mature
galaxies are *still* observed as you expect, all the BB Theorists
have to do is pretend re ionisation started a bit earlier at
180 billion years. And this would allow the BBT to predict that
galaxies could still be observed at 380 billion years.
Just at the JWST limit of z=15 !
So truth is Jacob. The Big bang theorists will always revise
their theory to pretend that the latest observation which
originally wasn’t possible under the BBT. IS NOW POSSIBLE!
Don’t forget. Only a few decades ago the Big Bangers were
saying the universe was only 1.5 billion years old!

jacob

P.S. I am not astronomer and I am not seeking any personal gain. I
have a Master's degree in Microbiology and Biochemistry, so I am a
complete unknown in this field. And NO I do NOT have any theory
about the universe to propose you, and I will never have one. I am
just telling you that the big bang didn't happen, that's all.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)