On Thursday, 24 February 2022 at 18:43:42 UTC, Pentcho Valev wrote:
David Morin, Introduction to Classical Mechanics, Chapter 11, p. 14: "Twin A stays on the earth, while twin B flies quickly to a distant star and back. [...] For the entire outward and return parts of the trip, B does observe A's clock running slow,
but ENOUGH STRANGENESS occurs during the turning-around period to make A end up older."
http://www.people.fas.harvard.edu/~djmorin/chap11.pdf
So, all along, the traveler sees himself aging FASTER than stationary people, but, during the short turning-around period, "enough strangeness" occurs and all stationary people suddenly get very old:
"At the same time, the twin in the spaceship considers himself to be the stationary twin, and therefore as he looks back towards Earth he sees his brother ageing more slowly than himself. [...] Ah, but in order to return to Earth, the spaceship must
slow down, stop moving, turn around and go back the other way. During those periods of deceleration and deceleration, it is not an inertial frame and therefore the normal rules of special relativity don't apply. When the twin in the spaceship turns
around to make his journey home, the shift in his frame of reference causes his perception of his brother's age to change rapidly: he sees his brother getting suddenly older. This means that when the twins are finally reunited, the stay-at-home twin is
the older of the two."
http://topquark.hubpages.com/hub/Twin-Paradox
The ideology imposed by the Einstein cult is immeasurably more idiotic than any mass idiocy in human history.
More here: https://twitter.com/pentcho_valev
Pentcho Valev
Relativists are certainly devious. Because they know that they
needed to con the gullible physics community into believing that
constant c in all frames is the only option. The best way was to make wildly incorrect predictions of various phenomena and experiments for the competing classical model. And then say because relativity seemed to correctly predict the
results, relativity must be the only theory to follow. I’ve already mentioned
elsewhere how relativists like Ives Stillwell faked the predictions for classical
theory for their experiment to discredit any non relativistic model. But another
good example of lies from supporters of relativity is the nonsense from de Sitter
of light speed in a classical model from a double star system.
If scientists on earth wanted to calculate and model the speed of light in an earth based experiment, would they do all their speed of light calculations for a light source on earth in a reference frame of a distant star rotating in a
double star system?
Of course not. But that’s exactly what the conman de Sitter did. He pretended
that the speed of light for a distant star in a classical model should be calculated in the earth reference frame!! Even though in fact in the source star frame the earth rotates at high speeds in an eliptical orbit.
If deSitter had correctly calculated light speeds for a non relativistic
model he should have done so in the *star source* frame where the earth rotates. Doing it this way keeps the light speed at constant c in the source frame as classical theory mandates. And only when light from the star
arrives to us in the earth frame is it observed to be at various speeds due to Doppler effects. No light piles up in the star frame as de Sitter pretends. And a non relativistic classical model is proven to not be ruled out as a viable theory by dishonest relativists flogging Special Relativity.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)