• An Obvious Fact That Wrecks Modern Physics

    From Pentcho Valev@21:1/5 to All on Fri Aug 19 10:08:32 2022
    "Thus, the moving observer sees a wave possessing the same wavelength [...] but a different frequency [...] to that seen by the stationary observer." http://farside.ph.utexas.edu/teaching/315/Waveshtml/node41.html

    "The wavelength is staying the same in this case." https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MHepfIIsKcE

    "The motion of an observer does not alter the wavelength. The increase in frequency is a result of the observer encountering more wavelengths in a given time." http://a-levelphysicstutor.com/wav-doppler.php

    If Einsteinians want to save modern physics, they will have to prove that this is not valid for light. In other words, they will have to prove that the motion of the observer does alter the wavelength of light so that the speed of the light relative to
    the observer can gloriously remain unchanged. Proving this is tantamount to proving that 2+2=5 but Einsteinians have some experience in proving absurdities.

    If the motion of the observer does not alter the wavelength of light after all, then, in accordance with the formula (frequency)=(speed of light)/(wavelength), the speed of light varies with the speed of the observer. And the texts below imply that, if
    the speed of light is variable, modern physics, predicated on Einstein's 1905 constant-speed-of-light falsehood, is long dead (exists in a zombie state):

    "He opened by explaining how Einstein's theory of relativity is the foundation of every other theory in modern physics and that the assumption that the speed of light is constant is the foundation of that theory. Thus a constant speed of light is
    embedded in all of modern physics and to propose a varying speed of light (VSL) is worse than swearing! It is like proposing a language without vowels." http://www.thegreatdebate.org.uk/VSLRevPrnt.html

    "If there's one thing every schoolboy knows about Einstein and his theory of relativity, it is that the speed of light in vacuum is constant. No matter what the circumstances, light in vacuum travels at the same speed...The speed of light is the very
    keystone of physics, the seemingly sure foundation upon which every modern cosmological theory is built, the yardstick by which everything in the universe is measured...The constancy of the speed of light has been woven into the very fabric of physics,
    into the way physics equations are written, even into the notation used. Nowadays, to "vary" the speed of light is not even a swear word: It is simply not present in the vocabulary of physics." https://www.amazon.com/Faster-Than-Speed-Light-Speculation/
    dp/0738205257

    "The whole of physics is predicated on the constancy of the speed of light...So we had to find ways to change the speed of light without wrecking the whole thing too much." https://motherboard.vice.com/en_us/article/8q87gk/light-speed-slowed

    See more here: https://twitter.com/pentcho_valev

    Pentcho Valev

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Pentcho Valev@21:1/5 to All on Sat Aug 20 04:41:12 2022
    The proposition "The wavelength of light is invariable" is obviously true in the Doppler (moving observer) scenario:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bg7O4rtlwEE

    The crucial point is that this proposition is true in ANY other scenario - Doppler (moving source), gravitational redshift, cosmological (Hubble) redshift.

    "The wavelength of light is invariable" will be the fundamental axiom in future, Einstein-free physics (if it's not too late to try to resurrect theoretical physics).

    More here: https://twitter.com/pentcho_valev

    Pentcho Valev

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)