"We've known for decades that space-time is doomed," says Arkani-Hamed. "We know it is not there in the next version of physics."
https://www.discovermagazine.com/the-sciences/amplituhedron-may-shape-the-future-of-physics
Philip Ball: "And by making the clock's tick relative - what happens simultaneously for one observer might seem sequential to another - Einstein's theory of special relativity not only destroyed any notion of absolute time but made time equivalent to a
dimension in space: the future is already out there waiting for us; we just can't see it until we get there. This view is a logical and metaphysical dead end, says [Lee] Smolin."
http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/2013/jun/10/time-reborn-farewell-reality-
review
"Bye bye space-time: is it time to free physics from Einstein's legacy?"
https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg24332472-900-bye-bye-space-time-is-it-time-to-free-physics-from-einsteins-legacy/
"Rethinking Einstein: The end of space-time...Horava, who is at the University of California, Berkeley, wants to rip this fabric apart and set time and space free from one another..."
https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20727721-200-rethinking-
einstein-the-end-of-space-time/
What scientific idea is ready for retirement? Steve Giddings: "Spacetime. Physics has always been regarded as playing out on an underlying stage of space and time. Special relativity joined these into spacetime...The apparent need to retire classical
spacetime as a fundamental concept is profound..."
https://www.edge.org/response-detail/25477
Spacetime is a logical consequence of Einstein's 1905 constant-speed-of-light postulate, theoretical physicists:
"Special relativity is based on the observation that the speed of light is always the same, independently of who measures it, or how fast the source of the light is moving with respect to the observer. Einstein demonstrated that as an immediate
consequence, space and time can no longer be independent, but should rather be considered a new joint entity called "spacetime."
https://www.bowdoin.edu/news/2015/04/physics-professor-baumgarte-describes-100-years-of-gravity.html
So you cannot "retire" the consequence but continue to worship the underlying postulate. Logic forbids you to do so.
See more here:
https://twitter.com/pentcho_valev
Pentcho Valev
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
