• Re: book report

    From x@21:1/5 to erik simpson on Mon Jan 27 02:21:30 2025
    On 1/17/25 08:34, erik simpson wrote:
    On 1/17/25 4:31 AM, John Harshman wrote:
    On 1/14/25 5:13 PM, erik simpson wrote:
    I've just finished reading "Macroevolutionaries" by Lieberman and
    Eldredge.  I recommend it highly.  It's a history extending from the
    beginning of the 19th century to the present of the evolution (no
    pun) of the gradual development of our understanding of evolution
    itself. One of the punctuations (pun intended this time) is the
    brilliance of SJ Gould.

    Some of the more funny chapters involves the evolution of trumpets,
    replete with a mass extinction of valveless trumpets around 1820,
    rapid diversification and eventual slower evolution to the present
    day. Clades can be identified. It seems that biology isn't the only
    thing that "only makes sense as evolution".

    How do slide trombones fit into the phylogeny? And are horns featured?
    Presumably they developed valves at around the same time.
    Trombones were only morphologically different.  Horns were like
    trumpets, but differed in having three different types of valves so
    there were even more clades than trumpets.

    So. Double checking.

    The music of the spheres is minor mode, right?

    This is because 1.5 times the frequency of c is f
    sharp or g flat, and is neither f nor g?

    (An 'octave' actually has seven notes and not
    eight, but is actually 7 + 5 (twelve tones).)

    Correct?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From x@21:1/5 to erik simpson on Tue Jan 28 14:43:05 2025
    On 1/27/25 20:37, erik simpson wrote:
    On 1/27/25 2:21 AM, x wrote:
    On 1/17/25 08:34, erik simpson wrote:
    On 1/17/25 4:31 AM, John Harshman wrote:
    On 1/14/25 5:13 PM, erik simpson wrote:
    I've just finished reading "Macroevolutionaries" by Lieberman and
    Eldredge.  I recommend it highly.  It's a history extending from
    the beginning of the 19th century to the present of the evolution
    (no pun) of the gradual development of our understanding of
    evolution itself. One of the punctuations (pun intended this time)
    is the brilliance of SJ Gould.

    Some of the more funny chapters involves the evolution of trumpets,
    replete with a mass extinction of valveless trumpets around 1820,
    rapid diversification and eventual slower evolution to the present
    day. Clades can be identified. It seems that biology isn't the only
    thing that "only makes sense as evolution".

    How do slide trombones fit into the phylogeny? And are horns
    featured? Presumably they developed valves at around the same time.
    Trombones were only morphologically different.  Horns were like
    trumpets, but differed in having three different types of valves so
    there were even more clades than trumpets.

    So.  Double checking.

    The music of the spheres is minor mode, right?

    This is because 1.5 times the frequency of c is f
    sharp or g flat, and is neither f nor g?

    (An 'octave' actually has seven notes and not
    eight, but is actually 7 + 5 (twelve tones).)

    Correct?
    I'm unfamiliar with the music of the spheres.

    I am thinking that the 'music of the spheres'
    refers to Pythagoras.

    As for the octave, it's the interval specified by doubling or halving in frequency.  In a well-temepered scale there are 12 equally spaces half-tones, with the octave being the next.  Modal scales (generally archaic) have different spacings.  I'm not familiar with then either.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)