(Delayed Quantum Choice Eraser) retrocausal modification of conception: so perhaps previously described is how having a delayed quantum choice eraser (DQCE) linked to which particular one of 10,000 sperm samples (gametes) is utilized to make a person,
while also having the system be physics/laser observable a decade or a couple decades after the mechanism specified a initial sperm sample causes retrocausal genome editing. That way an observation of the DQCE sperm selector one or two decades (or more
chronological moments) farther along the time span then causes a different sperm sample to be used retrocausally; A completely different person results from the DQCE linked gamete chooser. That gives the person the ability to specify a do-over of their
life whenever they like. If someone feels they would like to be blonder they just click on blonder at the computer application that is linked to a photon observing machine. The thing is someone online says retroactively observing the gamete-choosing
photon only effects that one timeline, but perhaps the vast majority of persons, at the many MWI timelines, who would like to modify their past step up and participate telling the DQCE sperm chooser they would like an improvement. Let’s say a
teenager has a crush, and would like to talk to their crush. All they have to do is go to the software and click “favor sperm with social skills”, It is possible perhaps a majority of persons exepriencing a crush try this out, so if a million or
trillion Yous occur at the MWI, most of them will have a crush, and seek to modify their genetics to have a more optimized love life; those possibly beyond trillions of teenagers mostly opt to improve their dating acumen. This causes most versions of
the teenager to improve at the majority of the MWI universes where the conception uses a DQCE sperm sorter. This most-timelines opt-in to an improvement, benefitting perhaps the majority of area under the MWI curve, goes with other things besides
quality of romance. As the genetics of newly conceptualized beneficial things (isolateable beneficial modal behaviors), like say moving towards opportunity, or being well rested are found, then people, at whatever their chronological age when the new
modal beneficial choosable are characterized, opt for those benefits.

Notably as all the sperm samples that the DQCE and software that foster choice and updates at conceptions based on eugenics samples already, so the person still has their intelligence, kindness, longevity, beauty, and median or better social skills at
every sperm sample. Readdressing their conception they just have the ability to opt for even more of some characteristic. Going from 99.99th percentile of g intelligence to 99.999th percentile could be a DCQE software navigable upgrade.

Notably, the sperm samples can be analyzed with technology that improves throughout the person’s chronological life. Gene sequencing a separate sample to that of the actual used sperm gives a 40 year old more phenotype from genotype choice precision
than that available to the earlier teen.

So out of of 10,000 samples it is possible that the human editing their past can converge on what they feel and think is optimum phenotypically, that is physically, influencing on their actual personal behavior and, if they like, things about their body
done a different way based on their observations of actual human society. Perhaps if it were a 1950 AD conception being edited, a drafted male might modify their past conception to produce a college-likely genius girl/woman who is outside of government
draft policy. They are twice as likley to skip the draft: College likelihood increased, female sex likelihood increased or determined. A woman that had a difficult pregnancy might opt to edit her reconception to be a male person with the genetics of
easy birth, so that male person’s female descendents had an easier time of pregnancy.

I do not know the math of MWI universes, which as of 2019 AD seem to emphasize comparing infinities or possible finite quantities that are notably large, like quantities greater than the integer number of photons in the universe. Upgradeable with
improved math and research that I or others do, is the possible idea that if a person edits their conception once a year during the first 200 years of their life, or more and longer lifespan, based on reconceiving for greater longevity, it is possible
that the conception edits that a 20 year old does and thus resulting lives, occupy a describable fraction of the sum of all the versions of the person generated; Compare that 20 year old area-under curve at MWI with the number of person versions produced
when a 14 year old edits their own conception. If there are a trillion MWI versions of the 14 year old, which as more moments occur, branch to become a quadrillion 20 year olds, Then the 20 year old has a different proportion of genotypic->phenotypic
capabilities and personality forms. A 110 year old might have different values and preferences when they edit their conception than a 14 year old.

It is perceptibly rational and beneficial to begin a person’s conception with the most eugenics optimized gametes available, then at conception upgrades, the conception is edited to heighten benficiality based on actual behaviors and feelings of the
person as well as characteristics of the people they are around and possibly their “society”.

If a person thinking about causing a child to come into being did not know what else to do they could start out with moment of first conception optimized gametes (sample one at the DCQE sperm sorter), then augment that with having the DQCE sperm choice
software be guided by the child-generating human’s nomination of a person, Artificial Intelligence, or software that they think knows better than them (the person that initiated the conception of a child). AT one imaginable application, that way, when
at 14 I DCQE sperm-sortation upgrade my conception to produce a phenotype with better social skills so I can effortlessly talk with my romantic crush at 14, that preference is complemented with what the AI, or esteemed person thinks might be beneficial
as well. So, more social fluency might be augmented with greater tallness, as the AI knows that taller people experience others spontaneously suggesting new opportunities more often, and however well the romance goes it is likely I will find more
opportunities, of all beneficial kinds, at the new phenotype’s future valuable.

Frequent reconception updates could be optimal: also, ease of use in editing one’s own conception (At 2019 AD this would be perhaps a few clicks on a computer that was linked to the photonics of the DCQE apparatus) favors frequent editing, which might
go along with more improvements, thus a notably happier more satisfying life for those large, possibly finite, or possibly infinite yet of different size, MWI (Many Worlds Interpretation of physics) generated persons. As I perceive it, conception edits
made in earlier youth would have more area under the curve at the MWI than conception edits a 200 year old does. So, rather than it being a momentous thing to edit one’s conception it could be a casual frequent thing done out of optimism as well as
when seeking a solution for a nonoptimality.

Also, there is a computer scieince or mathematics approach to optimizing number of sperm samples, the beneficial eugenics base of all the sperm samples, and how much can be addressed (the gamete based genome database span and size)

Of course, with a mechanism that produces synthetic genomes, at new purposefully produced usable gametes, the synthetic genome DCQE gamete chooser/changer can actually have a many bit (like 256 bit or greater) factorial genetic space that the further
subsequent chronological moment DCQE observations can then adjust to change the person being conceived or reconceived’s life. That creates more possible genomes than just the sperm sorter version. As of 2019 AD the sperm sorter is buildable now.

As an MWI thing, it is possible that the custom-genome space at a DQCE genome chooser thing could be more beneficial to more people if it had a group of known beneficial, talented, and physiologically and mentally well genomes as base templates. Noting
I do not actually know the math of the MWI, the possibility of nonfinite combinatorics suggests that basing the combinatoric possibilities of conceptions and edited reconceptions on a bunch of known to be optimal templates could produce phenotypes,
genotypes, personalities and human behaviors that have a mean, median, mode, and perhaps “attractor” towards optimality.

Using templates might reduce the “MWI risk” of a “simple” combinatoric of all possible human DNA sequences. At the risk of causing people, that is humans, to remain people, that is humans, using optimal or near optimal templates for synthetic
gamete DQCE reconception editing could make better MWI branches. Known near optimal templates could MWI area-under-the curve favor human, that is people’s genotypes and phenotypes that actually produce conceptions and edited reconceptions that come
from a group more statistically/numerically likely to be sentient, happy, well, three, four or five times more intelligent than Treon Verdery, with multicentury longevity, beneficial and also of benefit to other actual sentient humans.

At the sperm or egg choice version of the DQCE conception and reconception technology, there are some CS(computer science)/math branching and batching equations and modelling that are likely to heighten the span and scope of the possible beneficial
genomes; Although it could be a different number or quantity, thinking of 10,000 sperm samples: thinking MWI-math, mathematically is it better to group these on subject, that is specifiable genotype and thus phenotype, branches with 300 sperm samples at
each subject? Thinking about the 14 year old that is editing their reconception so they can particularly enjoy dating and romance, and easily talk with their romantic crush: one Group of subject area gamete samples available, that is a particular
version, of this might be 300 sperm samples isolated based on the genetics of 99th percentile of [big five psychology test] absence of neuroticism with 70th percentile at extraversion. It is possible that at the 14 year old’s first origin conception
the 50th percentile of extraversion was used as a conception basis. The 14 year old can use the DQCE gamete specifying software to do reconception, making themselves more sociable while maintaining the already existing eugenics benefits which are also
present at the 300 samples of sperm.

At 2019 AD, sperms or eggs could be gathered, prior to research supported knowledge of a genetic basis for, on personality, appearance, and achievement of gamete donors. I favor a technology that concentrates eugenics beneficial genes at stem cell
produced eggs and sperm. Notably though, a 2019 AD version of DQCE conception editing can actually use a 20th century style collected eggs and sperms to produce genotype and phenotype change. The 14 year old editing their reconception can make use of
existing gamete technology.

Noting the math and computer science of gamete groupings, branches, and sources; There is a possible beneficial effect, sort of the opposite of externalities, that are system tendencies towards benefit even without, or prior to gamete specification at
reconception. If you use the Scandinavian population to draw the 10,000 sperm/gamete sample from then the reconception adjustable genomes come preloaded with benefits that occur that precede optimizing specification at the databese/selectable pool of
DCQE editable gametes. If you use Swedish people blondeness is likely to be spontaneous without an DCQE reconception effort. Danish genomes favor tallness, again a beneficial background effect that, although also choosable at DQCE sperm sortation, is
like a spontaneously produced environmental good.

So, even absent knowing, or prior to knowing what the actual phenotype expressed human genome does, it is possible to take the gamete samples from groups that have measurable individual and social or even societal beneficial or more optimal trends
compared with a global median person. Although it is possible to imagine various measures of: above the global median at optimality, could vary,: it is possible that the genetics of the 99th percentile of human well being, regardless of the society that
human is located at could be combined with 99th percentile of societal well being to produce a physical location to gather gamete as well as stem cell culture samples at.

(Although there is more to it, it is possible to think of society as groups of persons having phenotypes with a bulk measurable effect) Combining the genetics of 99th percentile of an individual doing well regardless of culture, with, and also finding
the 99th percentile of beneficial optimal exsiting culture to give a geographic region, could be combined to create a beneficial background good trend and metanalytic trend; a good stock base that supports particular benefits from specified gene or
gamete eugenics. It is possible the Scandinavian nations, notably the measured as happiest-in-the-world like Denmark, or the world leader in educational effectiveness, Finland, combine 99th percentile of individual success with 99th percentile of
society-wide beneficial function. At 99th percentile in both individual well being and effective functioning of a society noting that is at least partially the result of a mass of phenotypically and genotypically similar individuals, Scandinavian sperm,
egg and tissue culture stem cell donors have numeric support as an optimal eugenics base.

Notably: thinking on societies as groups of interacting phenotypes, such society-wide things as qunatitatively measured subjective well being (happiness), prosperity and longevity might be causally linked to things like having a minimum as well as
maximum measured percentage of humans phenotypically exist at some measured value of the Big five personality test like conscientiousness. So some quantity of people, at some numerical distribution of measured conscientiousness, is correlatable, and
possibly linkable as an actual cause, to societal well being. Notably there might be a different, less optimal amount of well being at higher than the optimal quantities-of-persons-having or amplitude of conscientiousness while that phenotypic group
causes human experience as a society.

Scientific research on the optimized and optimizable genotype and phenotype of an individual that is the optimized individual, while simultaneously optimizing the phenotypic group of persons effect that society might be considered as, increases
opportunities for beneficial optimization. This also creates additional ways of viewing eugenic benefit, as well as the benefits of conception and reconception at a DQCE gamete sorter.

Math: local minima, curve landscape and topology, that combine and portray the optimization of individual genome, genotype, phenotype, and lived consciousness based in phenotype, while also noting awareness of societal bulk phenotype, from genotype,
effects is possibly likely to have many, curves, pockets, as well as heights at a varied mathematical topological landscape. Awareness that that the landscape of optimization could be structurally and mathematically varied could reduce concerns, or a
tendency to, social or cultural ideological themes. It is possible to say, “we can figure it out, and it is engineerable, and the math structures and possibly visualizations communicate that that’s different than saying or endorsing all tidiness and
heightened intelligence with polite manners is a monocultural preference”.


Note: I perceive that from a pattern resonance IT/IL technology perspective that blonde people experience synchonized (similar to Jungian synchronicity) favor and benefit just from having hair that is light colored. Making people blonde, is, from what I
might comprehend, beneficial to them paranormally while being absent risk of any personal paranormal influence or risk at their own lives. Having blonde children benefits those children and the people they grow up to be. Swedish sperm, eggs, and tissue
culture provide this as a benefit when used as a provides-environmental-good resource of richness, where that richness is present even prior to specific study.

One way to make subject-specific, that is genotype and phenotype of physiological and mental well being DQCE specifiable gametes is to use stem cells to mass produce sperm or eggs with preferred genomes and characteristics. While it is possible during
2019 AD to get a sperm or egg or stem cell sample from a person that is measured as being and doing well, with various beneficial genetic, phenotypic, and personality characteristics, another way to do it is to composite an accumulation of eugenics
beneficial genes.

Compositing and accumulating beneficial genes together to make new, sperm or eggs usable at conception, and available for DQCE reconception use that have a high benefit starting eugenic makeup: Find persons, with genotypes (genomes, SNPs) that are
beneficial at eugenics. It is possible to make sperm as well as eggs from stem cells derived from those humans, that is persons. Clonal stem cells from persons with valued eugenics already have one or more beneficial genes or versions of genes.
Differentiate the stem cells from different eugenic samples or persons into sperms and eggs. Combine the large volume of sperms and eggs derived from stem cells, that have two or more different eugenics beneficial genes, that are different from each
other, to produce hundreds of thousands or millions of blastocycts at tissue culture. These bulk produced blastocysts will have varying genetics, giving an opportunity to note, characterize the genomes of, and gather the blastocysts that have the
highest actual number, that is amount, of beneficial eugenics genes. This is a way to accumulate numerous eugenics beneficial genes at a tissue culture much faster than selective sequential breeding of humans could produce.

It is even possible that of 20,000 human genes that this bulk recombination and blastocyst generation, with sequencing to characterize genomes and make the preferred next generation of increased eugenics genes sperm, eggs or tissue culture, could
optimize all 20,000 human genes. Notably software or artificial intelligence could be used to predict which versions of the 20,000 genes are optimal; then these entire-full-genome optimized genes could be combined and bulk produced making optimized
sperms, eggs, as well as stem cell cultures to create humans that then benefit from having eugenics optimized genomes.

Notably at DQCE conception and reconception editing different versions of an optimized core genome can be produced and navigated. That is a way to make it so all of the 10,000 sperm and egg samples available at reconception DQCE all have a fully
functional eugenics beneficial core shared source.

As previously described, concentrate genes, bulk produce, and sequence, a plurality of times, adding more and more eugenics beneficial genes to the sperms and eggs balstocysts and tissue cultures produced at each cycle of :sperm, egg, blastocyst, gene
sequencing of blastocyst, Then accumulate and group these beneficial genes together to produce a multibeneficial sperms or eggs. Use stem cell technology to produce clonal sperm as well as clonal eggs; combine these eggs and sperm, grow to blastocyst,
sequence the genes from blastocyst occuring at the new combination; then combine these eugenics concentrated gametes more times to produce sperm as well as eggs with all of the preferred genes. Then sort the created gametes on largest simultaneous number
of beneficial gene versions, then stem cell clone the improved and concentrated gamete genetics of eugenics gametes.

Mathematics of DQCE reconception as well as genetics: One approach, previously described as finding the overlap of 99th percentile of optimized individual genetics with 99th percentile optimal societial, with societal specifiable as a society being a
bulk effect of a group of phenotypes arising from genomes, genetics and genome, as an approach notes there is a mathematics of getting both right simulataneously.

Finding beneficial environmental goods, or good stock from as-yet-unmeasured genetics and phenotypic determinants: Besides 99th percentile individual genomes and phenotypes, and group-phenotype-formed-societies which could be good-stock sampleable as
geographic areas at 99th percentile societies: it is possible the overlap of 99th percentile genome based individual well being and human behaviors frequent at almost all human beings could be basis for genetic sampling to find eugenics beneficial
optimums. People who are at the 99th percentile of child well being and resulting child-outcome while being human physiological parents could have a genotypic and phenotypic basis for their optimality; this optimizes and benefits one area of
physiological, phenotypic and genomic form doing something, having and raising children, that most humans do. Finding the phenotypes and genotypes of optimality of other things that almost all humans do could contribute to beneficial genetic
optimization, eugenics, as well as DQCE reconception technology.

Humans, that is people, also sleep and have mental focus and attentiveness. Genomics of 99th percentile beneficial and enjoyable quality of sleeping as well as 99th percentile ability to focus and/or be receptively alert and attentive, could be areas of
human-spanning benefit.

I perceive researchers have measured differences between humans, that is people, at measured quantity and character of moments of perceived enjoyable consciousness. So phenotypically and genetically there is published support that some people exist more
than others, that is they have more moments, as well as possibly higher amplitude moments as well as sustained sensations or mental actuality of aware-mind, that they experience as enjoyable. 99th percentile genetics of voluntary enjoyment of presence
of mind are a possible eugenics technology item as well; existing, like having children and sleeping is another area where the phenotype of a shared most-all-humans activity has an optimizable genetics.

That brings up an optimization opportunity for a person using DQCE gametes as part of reconception. As the effect of genes and particular genes and other physiological effectors of herditary phenotype and quantifiably measurable behavior, is
cumulatively found, and as researchers and technologists think of new kinds of benefits, or features (like doing DQCE reconception to cause more moments of enjoyable awareness) the person specifying the gametes used at their reconception can DQCE modify
their gametes retrocausally around those beneficial new features.

Noting the generation of new things, genomic improvement could come from more than enthused preference for better knownthings, as well as genomic solutions to non-optimal things (like DQCE reconception as genetically and phenotypically female dodges
selective service at some countries), completely new features could be researched and technologized from the genome, notably the DQCE reconception sperm or other gamete list of choosables.

DQCE could also modify epigenetics, like the chemical environment at conception, in a retrocausally programmable way: another technology at the DQCE (Delayed Quantum Choice Eraser) retrocausal modification of conception, called reconception, is the DQCE
gamete technology also having a, technologically derived from actual research, adjustable epigenetic component. If, either surplus or reduced ambient ATP during the blastocyst stage is found to have beneficial effects, then the DQCE mechanism could make
it so humans, that is people, could specify the amount of ATP at their reconception, as conception environment. As a technology, not only could 100 studied epigenetic influences and/or chemicals be available for adjustment, it is possible a future
addressing of a parallel photonic array form of DQCE could actually produce retrocausally created words or numbers. One reconception option is to have the reconception biology technician or the robot doing what the human biology technician would do, is
to order that particular number chemical from a chemical supply company and make it a contributor to the retrocausally enhanced epigenetic environment. It is also possible that the parallel photonic DQCE array produced chemical number could be a
generator of any IUPAC chemical structure, for use as a reconception biological technology active ingredient. It is possible that retrocausal epigenetics could provide even more options and customizable benefit to the person, like the 14 year old,
modifying their biologically conceived being retrocausally.

Along with the custom chemical DQCE reconception technology, perhaps 100 different well researched chemicals or protocol variants,possibly effecting epigenetics, could be part of DQCE’s adjustability from observing a photon path and then retrocausally
changing the path of the photon with a chronologically subsequent (possibly decades “later”) observation, where the photon path is linked at the dynamic moment of the apparatus to which particular gametes and epigenetic variables are then freshly
optimized to be.

The math of how many persons, as MWI branch individuals, (versions of you) that experience benefit from DQCE reconception, when figured out, could support some notably beneficial, perhaps standard ways to use the technology. Just thinking, the presence
of an artificial intelligence guided companion robot, or even just a (human, that is person), sentience utilized software companion, at that particular person’s life physically and chronologically prior to a reconception action, could cause the person
to be re-befriended or raised, by that companion robot again, while the robots software and hardware might be math of MWI unlikely to change;

This thing where some context might be durable and conserved amonst MWI branches could be beneficial at the experience of preference and doing planning and actions. The 14 year old that would like to be socially fluent and talk to their romantic crush,
where that crush is a person they actually know of at their MWI branch universe, could possibly structure things at their DQCE reconception so that their crush still existed accessibly to their personal being even after the DQCE reconception. One
possibility is unique-genome online conversational addresses. A companion robot urges you to start online chat with the genetically identical person to the person you, prereconception, had a crush on.

Although I do not know MWI math, theoretically she, the romantic crush, would not change her genetics ; these seems particularly true when the 14 year old’s romantic crush is even 1 second older than them: genetically, the other person already exists
at the reconceived person’s MWI branch, and could be sought out after reconception.

(A thing that could amplify appreciation for, and contribute to the actual production of reconception would be a popular treatment of an MWI reconception romance, it could get a lift from the popularity of the “groundhog day” movie genre, only the
technology is functional, and there are actual things you can do to have things go well with the person you feel affectionate towards)

Technology: how much mutliplexed massively parallel delayed quantum choice eraser structure is possible? At some simple amount; the published first DQCE, you can produce a new output from a different observation of optical path; can you do enough path
variation and quantity to code out an ascii sentence? If you can then you can send yourself a note in the past. I have not seen that supported or criticised at anything online or published that I have heard of though.

MWI branch durables: that person to person possible availability is qualitatively different than the general lift of “the romantic reconceived 14 year old going from 50th percentile extroverted to 70th percentile extroverted makes then twice as likely
to have an active romantic life, regardless of who with” effect

The production of MWI branch durables, reminds me of math and electronics: If you have a conductor, and insultor, and a semiconductor you can make a variety of different things. Three kinds of things makes a construction kit. The companion robot being a
durable, could have system generating/engineering object generating utility. Another durable might be City. A person conceived at a city might be likely to see particular views, travel particular streetswith some likelihood, or even predictably attend
one of a few different possible educational institutions.

One use of this durable object effect at reconception is having different physical locations a reconception could occur at. IVF like reconception versions, contrasting with the 2019 AD, fairly easy, “which tube of actual photonically lighted up sperm
the woman grabs from a sampling”, could have the reconceived person specified to physically originate at new location. A person could use IVF technology DQCE reconception to be an IVF conceptus as Copenhagen or Stockholm instead of Seattle.

Is this ethical: MWI autoreplicating increasor technology; how does crispr/cas9 work? If I think of a technology that puts MWI technology, possibly DQCE or a cool matter MWI branch or macro-branch (world), or even mini-branch, generator that is more
branch producing abundant than warmth, like the sun, that causes more of itself to exist, can the numerics of math accumulations of new universes be made probabalistically near completely likely, or higher? It may be possible to do a paticular thing at
a majority of MWI universes.

There might be something online already about how to do an action, or even think of things such that the number of MWI universes that contain the preferred effect or product is higher.

It is possible that humans customizing the MWI universes could be beneficial, the thing is that I do not know the effect of the lightcone on the MWI; if it matters then the sun could be causing so many MWI branches that human produced MWI events, while
engineered to be highly beneficial, might not always be the majority MWI effect. Technology Modifying the amount of MWI universes produced; particularly figuring out a way to make something that produces more MWI branch unverses than the sun does:
degrees of freedom, heightened dimensionality compared with electron spectral emission levels. Possible Dyson sphere could process the surrounded solar output at a physically new structure or possibly material, that has lots more MWI branch universe
generation than quantum emission levels produce, like might be previously frequent at the sun. I saw electrons arranged as a fractal online, can electron systems with more dimensionality like that, possibly degrees of freedom, produce more MWI branches;
simplistically could a fractal nuke make lots more MWI branches than another kind?


[continued in next message]

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)