or triladder, or quadro-ladder each have an atom on them, then the atoms cofocalize to make an assemblage of virtual atoms that can be used at an actual produced technology. The custom shapes of proteins, as well as their predictable mechanism-like
motions, notably some I have seen at cytological biological systems, could be used to make virtual atom assemblages and even do things like swing them together or hold them at adjustable lengths from each other to make things, that is, technology objects.
Things like virtual atom technology proteins could go along with circular-gap graphene stacked sheets as things that can produce stuff.

Photovoltaic or semiconductor or custom band gap material made from cofocalized virtual atoms: can you change the bandgap of an existing semiconductor if you project a virtual atom onto it, or its surface? Another possibility is making an entire new
semiconductor completely out of virtual atoms Notably, at images I have seen, virtual atoms are produced with near 20-40 actual atoms at a parabola; 40 atoms is many many orders of magnitudes less atoms to make something out of, a possible path to
eentsier computer and artificial intelligence parts. Could virtual atom cofocalization produced semiconductors have greater stability than actual element-made semiconductor crystals, beneficially effecting structural and performance variability and
possibly making them warmth nondegrading? Perhaps an atom parabola or other shape attached to a graphene grid, possibly a monolayer, or a stack of monolayers, could have greater warmth stability. Also, 40 metal atoms attached to the carbons at graphene
might be less warmth-wiggly. One possibility is lithium with its 1 unit of charge, another possibility is deuterium, as the higher mass of the deuterium form of hydrogen, noting hydrogen likes to attach to carbon, like graphene, might be less wiggly as
well.

The graphene grid could have big action-spaces or holes in it: So if you think of a graphene grid, with cofocalizing atoms on it having the virtual atom be at a place where the graphene grid had a big, possibly circular, 40 sided circle gap hole, then
the virtual atom would be free-floating, and able to be next to other virtual atoms, or even effect other molecules that drift through the 40 sided hole. That produces a custom reaction and building space with virtual atoms. A vertical | virtual-atom
polymer could be constructed in a stack of 40 atom hole graphene monolayers.

Obvious to say, but virtual atoms from things like parabolas or other shapes could be effected from externally applied charge or proton movement (protontronic charge) that might make them brighter, less overbearing, or more stationary to benefit
reactivity, positional stability, Plasmonics would be a technologically more sophisticated way of doing things with virtual atoms that uses electrons or protons to enhane, improve, and create new effects from virtual atoms.

Could cofocalizing virtual atom producing parabolas or other shapes be produced from phonons or other plasmonic structures at STP? A migrating or standing plasmonic structure that cofocalizes atoms and electrons as waves could make virtual atoms like
virtual halogens of virtual carbons that could possibly be electronically or protonically moved around, causing control of the chemistry and electrical characteristics of the virtual atoms. You couldmove stuff around, which could go well with atom-sized
manufacturing. Could a plasmonic virtual atom-migrating technological object do nanoassembler activities?

Could a virtual atom sturalized coating or layer on a photovoltaic cause charge optimization to either improve electron migration or photon absorption. A ladder polymer or graphene coated surface, or something like laser etched, texture of virtual atoms
could heighten phovoltaic efficiency. Similarly other things that generate electricity might benefit. Perhaps virtual atoms could affect the magnetic characteristics of a material.

Electrets (things like permanent locational charge materials or polymers) are a known thing, so parabolas-or other shape that generate virtual atoms could be made from electret materials. These could be stronger, more effective, higher reactivity,
purposefully optimized reactivity, or notably durable versions of virtual atom technology materials. Perhaps it is possible to populate the surface of graphene, or modify a protein or ladder molecule so it is an electret, then graphene and protein,
ladder molecule virtual atom technologies could have higher and durable energy. I do not know where electrets get their energy, I perceive I read that non-zero warmth causes atoms to have electrons above the ground state, so it is possible ambient STP
or even cooler could keep the energy up and available at an electret virtual atom technology or chemical effector, even though it was interacting with other atoms or virtual atoms. Than contrasts with piezoelectric plastics and ceramics which, I perceive,
happen when molecules or crystals respond to squeeziness or new molecule position to cause bunched up electrons.

If Dave’s theory of “schoedinger’s neurons” has value, or if adjusting the UQE interval or physical span has effects regardless of Dave’s idea, there could even be new drugs that effect the quantum superposition UQE interval of tissues, cytes,
like neurons, or proteins. Just as measurable things, perhaps not effect forecast from theory, or with Dave’s idea, these could have new medical effects or modify thoughts arising at a human, that is person, or people’s brains/CNS actual physical
brain or at an AI technology object. An MWI active drug.

What happens when you put an electret layer under or on top of a semiconductor? Permanent bias at a transistor?
Easy-trigger custom bandgaps, from partial pre-loading of electrons, (or I suppose things like their tunneling or availability, or blobby HOMO graphic of charge-at-molecule adjustments) at light emitters and photovoltaics? Non-polymer chemical vapor
depositable electrets could enhance semiconductor technology.

“DSP circuits, such as finite-impulse-response filters with fixed coefficients, you can build constant-multipliers which multiply by a constant” makes me think there are amazing sort of analog, but possibly digital, IC circuits out there that
multiply something with a coefficient. What is a way you could multiply something with (the coefficient) at an IC? I am thinking it is likely a square wave encoded thing that is being multiplied, otherwise you could just use a transistor or op-amp, but
the idea of a dedicated multiplier made of semiconductors that is nonlooping, that is not a turing machine, is entertaining. I have no idea how it would work. Maybe if you do something wild like XOR (or some more actual thing) the first three bits you
can do predictable doubling or halving, then progressively double or half the number-containing byte-word as fractional diminishing fractions (like 1-1/2 -1/4-1/8 from sequential xoring) to get a new number that is multiplied with an arbitrarily sculpted
number that is the coefficient. The sequential XORing, if the coefficient was fized and known, could be a in-semiconductor ladder of sequential XORs (1-1/2-1/4-1/8-1/16 etc) made out of little lines at a semiconductor to create a physical coefficient
multiplier of digital data, as compared with a CPU-style turing machine looping thing.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)