Neutral seems strange considering the casimir effect can generate electrons out of vacuum, it might be entertaining from a universe as neutrally charged investigative thing to find out if the casimir effect produces the same number of positrons as
electrons. Casimir effect suggests spontaneous tilt-like anisotropy to charge. Just writing things: although I think there is something more accurate than the big bang theory, big bang theorists might find the idea of casimir fluctuations at the
perimeter of an expanding point to be associated with electromagnetic bending of particle pathways. So for big bang theorists, the electrons sourced from, or developed from a big bang might veer away from casimir produced electrons or positrons, causing
anisotropy (variation) at the developed universe from early charge veering anisotropy. There is some thing I have no clue about called “breaking symmetry” at physics; casimir generation of particles and charges that other things veer away from, or
towards, could cause asymmetry. I kind of think they (physicists) mean something different for “how did asymmetry occur” though, it might have to do with the catalog of physcis particles or something.
Stackexchange person further says, “[universe allegedly neutral charge]… But since many theorists believe in a multi-verse*, shouldn't the total charge of the multiverse be zero and individual universes might or might not have charges?
“Therefore the idea of different parallel universes having different charges” as a reply to, “
Publish MWI technologies and approaches at stackexchange.com

wikipedia says, “In mathematics, an automorphism is an isomorphism from a mathematical object to itself. It is, in some sense, a symmetry of the object, and a way of mapping the object to itself while preserving all of its structure” It also says at
symmetry that there is a list of components, that is required math things, that when all of them are present causes a particular definition of symmetry to be met.

So thinking about what wikipedia says about automorphism, makes me think of set theory and matrices. At automorphisms there are some math things, perhaps math identities described at wikipedia, Automorphism reminds me of set theory and matrices; like
it has some math identies, possibly arranged at a list, or a relational group (Venn diagrams influencing me) (another group that relates: a matrix) that when they are fulfilled operationalize the definition of an automorphism. So from a set theory thing:
it seems like :wikipedia about automorphism: “an isomorphism from a mathematical object to itself. It is, in some sense, a symmetry of the object, and a way of mapping the object to itself while preserving all of its structure””
So thinking MWI, is there a something with more, or perhaps less, math-part components to make purposeful automorphism differences at a branch universe (and also automorphism differences at radioactive blob with optical loop nesting technology and math
identity)? If (math word:) symmetry matters at the MWI, the nested universe radioactive loop generator could have entirely different novel mathematical venn-diagram like things as well as different technical dimensionality(Technical dimensionality:
imagining the way a math definitional:knot seems to require 3 dimensions to do a flip) radioactive optical loop could possibly introduce more degrees of freedom as it is 3D instead of 1D or 2D like a MWI branch from a quantum event like a electron level
hopping and emitting a photon. The greater degrees of freedom at a 3d object compared with a 1D or 2D object suggest technologizable opportunities.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)