XPost: alt.privacy.anon-server, alt.privacy

https://m2usenet.virebent.art/

Nologs mail2usenet service

*ENJOY*

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: alt.privacy.anon-server, alt.privacy

In article <vr8i0b$194fa$1@paganini.bofh.team>
Gabx <victor@domain.invalid> wrote:

https://m2usenet.virebent.art/

Nologs mail2usenet service

*ENJOY*

Hmmm..


The connection has timed out

An error occurred during a connection to m2usenet.virebent.art.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: alt.privacy.anon-server, alt.privacy

Nomen Nescio wrote:> In article <vr8i0b$194fa$1@paganini.bofh.team>

Gabx <victor@domain.invalid> wrote:

https://m2usenet.virebent.art/

Hmmm..
The connection has timed out

c'est pas grave allez-y !!!

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Mon, 17 Mar 2025 14:02:25 -0000 (UTC), S.A. <personne@null.domain>
wrote:

Nomen Nescio wrote:> In article <vr8i0b$194fa$1@paganini.bofh.team>

Gabx <victor@domain.invalid> wrote:

https://m2usenet.virebent.art/

Hmmm..
The connection has timed out

c'est pas grave allez-y !!!

Yeah, it timed-out for me, too, earlier today but I just tried it and
it seems to work. Message ID: <vrade2$1h1u1$1@paganini.bofh.team> was
from me.

Sorry to use sci.crypt as a test group. :)

J.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

Did this work?

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

John <Man@the.keyboard> wrote:

On Mon, 17 Mar 2025 14:02:25 -0000 (UTC), S.A. <personne@null.domain>
wrote:

Nomen Nescio wrote:> In article <vr8i0b$194fa$1@paganini.bofh.team>

Gabx <victor@domain.invalid> wrote:

https://m2usenet.virebent.art/

Hmmm..
The connection has timed out

c'est pas grave allez-y !!!

Yeah, it timed-out for me, too, earlier today but I just tried it and
it seems to work. Message ID: <vrade2$1h1u1$1@paganini.bofh.team> was
from me.

Sorry to use sci.crypt as a test group. :)

There are plenty of test groups for that. alt.test being just one of
them.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Tue, 18 Mar 2025 03:07:01 -0000 (UTC), Rich <rich@example.invalid>
wrote:

John <Man@the.keyboard> wrote:

On Mon, 17 Mar 2025 14:02:25 -0000 (UTC), S.A. <personne@null.domain>
wrote:

Nomen Nescio wrote:> In article <vr8i0b$194fa$1@paganini.bofh.team>

Gabx <victor@domain.invalid> wrote:

https://m2usenet.virebent.art/

Hmmm..
The connection has timed out

c'est pas grave allez-y !!!

Yeah, it timed-out for me, too, earlier today but I just tried it and
it seems to work. Message ID: <vrade2$1h1u1$1@paganini.bofh.team> was
from me.

Sorry to use sci.crypt as a test group. :)

There are plenty of test groups for that. alt.test being just one of
them.

Yes, I do know this, but this discussion was ongoing in sci.crypt,
the test message was tiny and I wanted the result of the test to be
easily found by those already subscribing to *this* NG without them
needing to bother adding more complications to their lives.

And your berating post was longer than my test post. As is this.

I also thought that a couple of aspects of the email script were
interesting.

I did also apologise for the pollution. Rather nicely.

Y'know what, fuck it.

This ain't no fun no more.

J.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On 18/03/2025 09:31, John wrote:

On Tue, 18 Mar 2025 03:07:01 -0000 (UTC), Rich <rich@example.invalid>
wrote:

John <Man@the.keyboard> wrote:

On Mon, 17 Mar 2025 14:02:25 -0000 (UTC), S.A. <personne@null.domain>
wrote:

Nomen Nescio wrote:> In article <vr8i0b$194fa$1@paganini.bofh.team>

Gabx <victor@domain.invalid> wrote:

https://m2usenet.virebent.art/

Hmmm..
The connection has timed out

c'est pas grave allez-y !!!

Yeah, it timed-out for me, too, earlier today but I just tried it and
it seems to work. Message ID: <vrade2$1h1u1$1@paganini.bofh.team> was
from me.

Sorry to use sci.crypt as a test group. :)

There are plenty of test groups for that. alt.test being just one of
them.

Yes, I do know this, but this discussion was ongoing in sci.crypt,

Not so's anyone would notice.

the test message was tiny and I wanted the result of the test to be
easily found by those already subscribing to *this* NG without them
needing to bother adding more complications to their lives.

And your berating post was longer than my test post. As is this.

Feel free to grow up any time soon. Like the man said, there are
plenty of test groups.

I also thought that a couple of aspects of the email script were interesting.

But apparently unrelated to cryptography, or presumably by now
you'd have drawn our attention to the connection.

I did also apologise for the pollution. Rather nicely.

Y'know what, fuck it.

This ain't no fun no more.

Wait till you grow up. When eventually you "get" it about
respecting boundaries, you'd be amazed at how much fun remains to
be had that /doesn't/ involve shitting on the neighbours' lawns
and laughing "oops sorry" in their faces.

--
Richard Heathfield
Email: rjh at cpax dot org dot uk
"Usenet is a strange place" - dmr 29 July 1999
Sig line 4 vacant - apply within

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: alt.privacy.anon-server, alt.privacy

Gabx wrote:

https://m2usenet.virebent.art/

Nologs mail2usenet service

*ENJOY*

JFYI our m2n software is working properly, but I have figured out in
debug mode that paganini gives often 441 erros, which means that to
many people posted from the same IP address or are generating to many
errors, so that postings very very often do not appear.

So, while the general idea, of what we both are doing, is IMHO very good,
it is not a proper working solution.

Regards
Stefan

--
Onion Courier Home Server Mon-Fri 15:00-21:00 UTC Sat-Sun 11:00-21:00 UTC ohpmsq5ypuw5nagt2jidfyq72jvgw3fdvq37txhnm5rfbhwuosftzuyd.onion:8080 inbox
age1yubikey1qv5z678j0apqhd4ng7p22g4da8vxy3q5uvthg6su76yj0y8v7wp5kvhstum

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)