Which gateways are still working?
"f redl"@invalid.com wrote:
Which gateways are still working?
mail2news(A)mail2news.tcpreset.net
Gabx wrote:
"f redl"@invalid.com wrote:
Which gateways are still working?
mail2news(A)mail2news.tcpreset.net
No. His immoral offer reads more like
mail2news=§8?|34%#*/%yr§!&q0\~c&$@mail2news.tcpreset.net
changing from day to day and group to group.
Good luck!
"f redl"@invalid.com wrote:
Which gateways are still working?
mail2news(A)mail2news.tcpreset.net
Furthermore, OmniMix doesn't have to rely on the level of anonymity the
Tor network provides, as it's only used to transfer messages to the
entry remailer, whereas that remailer network then does the real anonymization job. And with OM every user is free to select the length
of Tor circuits from 2 up to 9 relays at his own sweet will. No deal.
OTOH those who are stupid enough to use dimbulb Claas' Mini Mailer have
to rely on a ridiculously short three hop Tor circuit. That way the
only sure thing is to be uncovered rather sooner than later.
On Sun, 01 Jun 2025 10:34:51 +0000, Mini Mailer
<bounce.me@mini.mailer.msg> wrote:
fredl@invalid.com wrote:
mail2news(A)mail2news.tcpreset.net
Does not work with QSL.
I can help you to set-up Mini Mailer with Tor.
It is much easier than QSL and a modern replacement for QSL.
https://github.com/Ch1ffr3punk/mmg
https://www.torproject.org/download/tor/
There is - was - nothing easier for anon posting/e-mail than QSL.
A totally tech ignorant like myself had it working in no time with no problems. As for those github pages, I don't understand a damn thing
I see on any github page.
Thanks for your offer of helping, but I'm bugging out of the anon
stuff. I really don't need it. Using PGP for the content of any
really personal e-mail is good enough for me. Another reason is
because of what a.p.a-s has turned into for the most part, a group
comprised of too much nasty conflict. The simple days of Christman &
QSL are gone.
Thanks again for the offer of Help.
Gabx wrote:
"f redl"@invalid.com wrote:
"f redl"??? Does Linux still require handrolling?
Which gateways are still working?
mail2news(A)mail2news.tcpreset.net
No. His immoral offer reads more like
mail2news=§8?|34%#*/%yr§!&q0\~c&$@mail2news.tcpreset.net
changing from day to day and group to group.
Good luck!
Anonymous User wrote:
Mini Mailer <bounce.me@mini.mailer.msg> wrote:
I can help you to set-up Mini Mailer with Tor.
It is much easier than QSL and a modern replacement for QSL.
https://github.com/Ch1ffr3punk/mmg
https://www.torproject.org/download/tor/
That gives you the insecurity of THREE Tor nodes!
I would never trust a Windows/Omnimix user, because of
a) https://support.torproject.org/misc/misc-11/index.html
b) Hello Pegasus and FinSpy.
Mini Mailer users can create their encrypted payload with
minicrypt offline and send it through pluto with awesome ORBs.
They can also use the awesome Nym Mixnet.
Windows users with Omnimix can't do that, but Windows users
with Mini Mailer can. :)
On 31 May 2025, Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> posted some >news:68a9a9973b811708b634acba66f6bb8d@dizum.com:
Gabx wrote:
"f redl"@invalid.com wrote:
"f redl"??? Does Linux still require handrolling?
Which gateways are still working?
mail2news(A)mail2news.tcpreset.net
Have not tried the above yet. Is it for mixmin, YAMN, direct?
No. His immoral offer reads more like
mail2news=§8?|34%#*/%yr§!&q0\~c&$@mail2news.tcpreset.net
changing from day to day and group to group.
Good luck!
Maybe you should learn how to troubleshoot Tor because it's been having
a ton of issues this past week for certain routes and exits. Some are >affected, some aren't.
On 31 May 2025, Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> posted some news:68a9a9973b811708b634acba66f6bb8d@dizum.com:
Gabx wrote:
"f redl"@invalid.com wrote:
"f redl"??? Does Linux still require handrolling?
Which gateways are still working?
mail2news(A)mail2news.tcpreset.net
Have not tried the above yet. Is it for mixmin, YAMN, direct?
No. His immoral offer reads more like
mail2news=§8?|34%#*/%yr§!&q0\~c&$@mail2news.tcpreset.net
changing from day to day and group to group.
Good luck!
Maybe you should learn how to troubleshoot Tor because it's been having
a ton of issues this past week for certain routes and exits. Some are affected, some aren't.
Fritz Wuehler wrote:
Furthermore, OmniMix doesn't have to rely on the level of anonymity the
Tor network provides, as it's only used to transfer messages to the
entry remailer, whereas that remailer network then does the real
anonymization job. And with OM every user is free to select the length
of Tor circuits from 2 up to 9 relays at his own sweet will. No deal.
OTOH those who are stupid enough to use dimbulb Claas' Mini Mailer have
to rely on a ridiculously short three hop Tor circuit. That way the
only sure thing is to be uncovered rather sooner than later.
Look, Tor’s default is 3 hops — entry, middle, exit — and that’s not a bug, it’s by design. Security and performance trade-off.
You can tweak it in theory, sure, but you’re mostly just wishin’ on a star past 3.
https://2019.www.torproject.org/docs/tor-manual.html.en >https://support.torproject.org/misc/misc-11/ >https://gitweb.torproject.org/tor.git/tree/src/core/or/circuitbuild.c
And even if OM claims it’s lettin’ you stretch that chain to 9, how exactly are you verifying that?
You just… trust it? Like, “I set it to 9 in the UI, so clearly I’m surfing through a digital Lord of the Rings quest with 9 magical nodes”?
Bruh. That’s faith-based anonymity.
$7C1A1517C27A0C68329D84D94372E0ACA9390B00~ForPrivacyNET,$0F5A78ECBA449016B00F05A85398D5AD3DC7A895~YoungBrother2,$33E621678DA5F8E2895B3359E64F3C2DCB8494C8~kobarr,$8B3E3A7806FA3A564905BE5CF9D2C431189B4295~prsv,$16025CFDC555E77939F84F199F88884C748CA422~GOGRelayAlb2,$828F5C4B7C0C9A8146DA32432A36F4BA1B60E238~prsv,$15DAE2F6C1614F30C84A3D
F1FD5ABB0218FEE9C0~trinity,$548317F9261EFE1B953B9B70373EF8AA33142843~TORvalds,$A157A997167AFFFD85D5F23D69AD3B2252F87255~r0cket14i1 BUILD_FLAGS=NEED_CAPACITY PURPOSE=GENERAL TIME_CREATED=2025-06-02T09:01:45.314905
| 00:09:17.374 140 BUILT $80AAF8D5956A43C197104CEF2550CD42D165C6FB~mdfnet2,$CA283EC8BBD13619B8F4A68090EE8200548F1DCB~prsv,$AF37B951F76D2BB577366FA059D1B1913DD74D41~Medulla,$D8476A2B13EE8D37F44EDACEB9E188DAF04DB27E~ShinyTsunami,$983D00AB339039B0D91734CB61DC79422BE602
Maybe you should learn how to troubleshoot Tor because it's been having
a ton of issues this past week for certain routes and exits. Some are >affected, some aren't.
You postin' circuit logs from OM doesn't prove the app's stretchin' the path. It just shows the info OM wants to display.
That's still all internal - no external verification.
You might as well write "trust me bro" at the bottom.
Anonymous User wrote:> | 00:09:17.374 135 BUILTGOGRelayAlb2,$828F5C4B7C0C9A8146DA32432A36F4BA1B60E238~prsv,$15DAE2F6C1614F30C84A3D
$7C1A1517C27A0C68329D84D94372E0ACA9390B00~ForPrivacyNET,$0F5A78ECBA449016B00F05A85398D5AD3DC7A895~YoungBrother2,$33E621678DA5F8E2895B3359E64F3C2DCB8494C8~kobarr,$8B3E3A7806FA3A564905BE5CF9D2C431189B4295~prsv,$16025CFDC555E77939F84F199F88884C748CA422~
F1FD5ABB0218FEE9C0~trinity,$548317F9261EFE1B953B9B70373EF8AA33142843~TORvalds,$A157A997167AFFFD85D5F23D69AD3B2252F87255~r0cket14i1 BUILD_FLAGS=NEED_CAPACITY PURPOSE=GENERAL TIME_CREATED=2025-06-02T09:01:45.314905
| 00:09:17.374 140 BUILT
$80AAF8D5956A43C197104CEF2550CD42D165C6FB~mdfnet2,$CA283EC8BBD13619B8F4A68090EE8200548F1DCB~prsv,$AF37B951F76D2BB577366FA059D1B1913DD74D41~Medulla,$D8476A2B13EE8D37F44EDACEB9E188DAF04DB27E~ShinyTsunami,$983D00AB339039B0D91734CB61DC79422BE602
Yo Fritz or whatever,
You keep talkin' like OmniMix is ridin' some next-level magic carpet through the Tor network just 'cause it says it's stretchin' to 9 hops. But c'mon, man. You really trust a Winzoz based UI checkbox over what the Tor devs themselves say?
Tor defaults to 3 hops - entry, middle, exit - and that's for a reason.
It's a sweet spot between speed and decent anonymity.
It's ment for web browsing in the first tcp place.
You postin' circuit logs from OM doesn't prove the app's stretchin' the path. >It just shows the info OM wants to display.
That's still all internal - no external verification.
You might as well write "trust me bro" at the bottom.
Security ain't about feelin' anonymous. It's about knowin' your stack and threat model. And if you're gonna dunk on someone else's setup, better bring receipts, not just screenshots from your favorite remailer GUI.
Stay sharp - not smug.
- Gabx
--- Digital Signature --- >4uUmq4EEm38PCAbar9YjDsyIIcye7bqD8uO/KV/5CVbxp2OJLNr38YObl7akqMphkjZS6KVaXeVuKFEglSwgDA==
Gabx wrote:
You postin' circuit logs from OM doesn't prove the app's stretchin' the path.
It just shows the info OM wants to display.
That's still all internal - no external verification.
You might as well write "trust me bro" at the bottom.
Well, I asked the Tor community. Tor allows settings for more than
3 hops. It is defined in the source code in src/core/or/or.h
/** How many hops does a general-purpose circuit have by default? */
#define DEFAULT_ROUTE_LEN 3
Out of curiousity I will try to compile Tor with more hops and will
look later how it performs with pluto and smtpdump, because of timeouts
and latency, which already happens with standard 3 hops, but pluto handles this already well, with smtpdump, due to retries.
If everything works well, during testing later, I may offer the latest
tor compiled with more hops, if the community likes to have an up-to-date tor/tor.exe.
easily be built from its source code even by an idiot like you. Now
tell us where in OM's sources you find the Tor log manipulation you
claim. For the genius you purpot to be that should be an easy task.
Face it, OmniMix is the ultimate tool for anonymous communication far
ahead of the Million Dollar Nym Bullshit not to mention the low-level
hacks you produce.
Gabx wrote:
You postin' circuit logs from OM doesn't prove the app's stretchin' the path.
It just shows the info OM wants to display.
That's still all internal - no external verification.
You might as well write "trust me bro" at the bottom.
Well, I asked the Tor community. Tor allows settings for more than
3 hops. It is defined in the source code in src/core/or/or.h
/** How many hops does a general-purpose circuit have by default? */
#define DEFAULT_ROUTE_LEN 3
Out of curiousity I will try to compile Tor with more hops and will
look later how it performs with pluto and smtpdump, because of timeouts
and latency, which already happens with standard 3 hops, but pluto handles >this already well, with smtpdump, due to retries.
If everything works well, during testing later, I may offer the latest
tor compiled with more hops, if the community likes to have an up-to-date >tor/tor.exe.
You treat OmniMix like it's religion, checkbox miracles and all.made of logs and hope.
The moment someone questions the gospel according to GUI, you start speaking in tongues
Reality check:
Tor still knows where you came from.
So do we.
Spoiler: no number of fake hops hides the fact you're posting straight outta USA.
All that effort, just to be geo-located faster than a McDrive order.
Stay faithful
You treat OmniMix like it's religion, checkbox miracles and all.
You treat OmniMix like it's religion, checkbox miracles and all.
The moment someone questions the gospel according to GUI, you start speaking in tongues made of logs and hope.
Reality check:
Tor still knows where you came from.
So do we.
Spoiler: no number of fake hops hides the fact you're posting straight outta USA.
All that effort, just to be geo-located faster than a McDrive order.
Stay faithful
Stefan Claas <stefan@mailchuck.com> wrote:
Gabx wrote:
You postin' circuit logs from OM doesn't prove the app's stretchin' the path.
It just shows the info OM wants to display.
That's still all internal - no external verification.
You might as well write "trust me bro" at the bottom.
Well, I asked the Tor community. Tor allows settings for more than
3 hops. It is defined in the source code in src/core/or/or.h
/** How many hops does a general-purpose circuit have by default? */ #define DEFAULT_ROUTE_LEN 3
Out of curiousity I will try to compile Tor with more hops and will
look later how it performs with pluto and smtpdump, because of timeouts
and latency, which already happens with standard 3 hops, but pluto handles this already well, with smtpdump, due to retries.
If everything works well, during testing later, I may offer the latest
tor compiled with more hops, if the community likes to have an up-to-date tor/tor.exe.
Been there, done that, dumbo.
Stefan Claas :
Identification through Uniqueness: If you use a non-standard number of
hops (e.g., 7 or 9), you become an easier target for deanonymization.
You stand out from the vast majority of Tor users who stick to the
default 3 hops. This "fingerprinting" by circuit length could actually
reduce your anonymity by making you unique.
Show us how to extract the number of hops from Tor packets.
Otherwise FOAD!
Depends on need. OmniMix serves what it is designed for and many other additional functions very effectively.
Nomen Nescio wrote:
Depends on need. OmniMix serves what it is designed for and many other
additional functions very effectively.
Nice. Can I snort it, or is it strictly for oral use?
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 546 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 00:30:28 |
Calls: | 10,385 |
Calls today: | 2 |
Files: | 14,057 |
Messages: | 6,416,569 |