My upstairs thermostat is a Robertshaw thermostat vintage 1980.
Yesterday I noticed it was getting a bit warm, and found that the
thermostat had failed to turn on the AC. I switched the thermostat to
Off, then exercised the control dial back and forth a few times, and
after that it has worked fine with no problem.
The thermostat is a TX400 or CM260, and in place of a mercury switch, it
uses a sealed reed switch and a magnet that's mounted at the end of a
coil spring.
Would it be a fair assumption that the problem yesterday was the reed
switch just not making good contact -
it's wearing out after 45 years.
It seems unlikely that it would be something at the AC end, but I don't
know much about how that works.
I just wonder if I should preemptively replace the thermostat, or wait
for it to mess up again, which may never happen.
Does anyone have a recommendation on a simple non-programmable Heat/Cool >thermostat? Or a brand to avoid?
When I thought this was a mercury switch, before I read
it a second time, I thought it likely a wire to the
swtich had broken where it flexed. Even good wire could
break after 45 years. But a reed switch changes the
odds towards a failed switch.
What happens if you use measure the voltage across the
reed swithc when the temp and setting calls for AC. It
should be zero or teeny-weeny if the switch is good.
But I don't remember or never knew if AC starts promptly
when the thermostat tells it to.
Does anyone have a recommendation on a simple
non-programmable Heat/Cool thermostat? Or a brand to
avoid?
FWIW https://www.ebay.com/itm/277091077135 $55 -S&H
after all t hese years
micky says...
> When I thought this was a mercury switch, before I read
> it a second time, I thought it likely a wire to the
> swtich had broken where it flexed. Even good wire could
> break after 45 years. But a reed switch changes the
> odds towards a failed switch.
Thanks very much for the reply. Yes, my conclusion was that
while a mercury bulb could last forever, a reed switch is
going to wear out eventually. From contact pitting I would
think, or perhaps an arm would break.
> What happens if you use measure the voltage across the
> reed swithc when the temp and setting calls for AC. It
> should be zero or teeny-weeny if the switch is good.
I haven't done that yet, but will give it a try if I can get
the front cover off - it's not clear how that's supposed to
happen. Probably just a friction fit.
> But I don't remember or never knew if AC starts promptly
> when the thermostat tells it to.
Yes, the blower motor starts immediately when the thermostat
switches. I really don't think there's a problem with the
AC itself.
>> Does anyone have a recommendation on a simple
>> non-programmable Heat/Cool thermostat? Or a brand to
>> avoid?
> FWIW https://www.ebay.com/itm/277091077135 $55 -S&H
> after all t hese years
Yeah, but if I'm going to replace it, I think I'll just get
a "modern" one at Home Depot for less money. I don't need
it to be programmable, but I would like to be able to adjust
the hysteresis.
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 546 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 150:18:47 |
Calls: | 10,383 |
Files: | 14,054 |
Messages: | 6,417,787 |