• Miraculous button makes things work again.

    From micky@21:1/5 to All on Sun Jan 26 12:02:09 2025
    XPost: sci.electronics.repair, alt.home.repair

    With email copy to Ed. Remove NONONO to email.

    I posted in another thread about my philips DVDR3575H dvdr with
    harddrive that stopped working 2 or 3 months ago. (I've had medical
    problems since Dec 11, so I've not gotten much done. They are scheduled
    to end or be permanent by March 11. I'm optimistic.)

    But I did buy another identical dvdr from ebay for 180 dollars (they had
    much cheaper, but the first one lasted me 15 years, and even though the
    one I just bought is also already 15 years old, I still think it will
    last 15 years. See, I'm optimistic.) And he was the only one who
    showed a tv with a picture on it in his photos.

    I put it in and it worked fine for 2 of the 3 tv's I'm using now, but
    one 14" crt tv has much more static when text or commercials come on the
    screen than it did before. That is another topic. Anyone have any
    ideas? I'll post details if you do.

    The topic here is what happened when I took apart the broken one. Since
    it was totally dead, I expected to find a problem with the power supply.
    I didnt' see anything burned out, and before I got out my meter, I
    looked around and in the middle of another board, iirc the tuner board,
    I found a little switch that looks like the middle ones in the back row
    here: https://www.google.com/imgres?q=mini%20push%20button%20switch&imgurl=https%3A%2F%2Fi.ebayimg.com%2F00%2Fs%2FMTYwMFgxNjAw%2Fz%2F~CQAAOSwg-NiIKR4%2F%24_57.JPG%3Fset_id%3D8800005007&imgrefurl=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ebay.com%2Fitm%2F402506084854&docid=
    lTwHaPMd2PG4uM&tbnid=IkOz4CNcM5iAZM&vet=12ahUKEwiUzL-g8JKLAxUckokEHQRPGacQM3oECGUQAA..i&w=1600&h=1600&hcb=2&ved=2ahUKEwiUzL-g8JKLAxUckokEHQRPGacQM3oECGUQAA
    The little black sticks sticking up in the middle are made of plastic or rubber, so like Dorothy in the Wizard of Oz or Alice in Wonderland, I
    pushed it down. And the DVDR started working again!!!

    How come they don't mention this in the owners manual for my model, and
    I found a service manual for a similar DVDR that doesn't say a word
    about it either. The switch is labeled Reset
    Sw.50
    I can post the urls for the manuals if you want.

    I haven't connected the output yet because I'd have to connect a RF
    modulator, but it shows On, Play, Rewind, none of which it did before.
    I'm 95% convinced it works as good as before. Unless it fails again?
    Likely? Why do they have this button if they're going to keep it
    secret?

    Have you ever heard of a button like this before?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ed P@21:1/5 to micky on Sun Jan 26 12:17:56 2025
    XPost: sci.electronics.repair, alt.home.repair

    On 1/26/2025 12:02 PM, micky wrote:
    With email copy to Ed. Remove NONONO to email.

    I posted in another thread about my philips DVDR3575H dvdr with
    harddrive that stopped working 2 or 3 months ago. (I've had medical
    problems since Dec 11, so I've not gotten much done. They are scheduled
    to end or be permanent by March 11. I'm optimistic.)

    The topic here is what happened when I took apart the broken one. Since
    it was totally dead, I expected to find a problem with the power supply.
    I didnt' see anything burned out, and before I got out my meter, I
    looked around and in the middle of another board, iirc the tuner board,
    I found a little switch that looks like the middle ones in the back row
    here: https://www.google.com/imgres?q=mini%20push%20button%20switch&imgurl=https%3A%2F%2Fi.ebayimg.com%2F00%2Fs%2FMTYwMFgxNjAw%2Fz%2F~CQAAOSwg-NiIKR4%2F%24_57.JPG%3Fset_id%3D8800005007&imgrefurl=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ebay.com%2Fitm%2F402506084854&docid=
    lTwHaPMd2PG4uM&tbnid=IkOz4CNcM5iAZM&vet=12ahUKEwiUzL-g8JKLAxUckokEHQRPGacQM3oECGUQAA..i&w=1600&h=1600&hcb=2&ved=2ahUKEwiUzL-g8JKLAxUckokEHQRPGacQM3oECGUQAA
    The little black sticks sticking up in the middle are made of plastic or rubber, so like Dorothy in the Wizard of Oz or Alice in Wonderland, I
    pushed it down. And the DVDR started working again!!!

    How come they don't mention this in the owners manual for my model, and
    I found a service manual for a similar DVDR that doesn't say a word
    about it either. The switch is labeled Reset
    Sw.50
    I can post the urls for the manuals if you want.

    I haven't connected the output yet because I'd have to connect a RF modulator, but it shows On, Play, Rewind, none of which it did before.
    I'm 95% convinced it works as good as before. Unless it fails again?
    Likely? Why do they have this button if they're going to keep it
    secret?

    Have you ever heard of a button like this before?

    Glad to you you back. Hope you have a good resolution to your problem.

    Seems a reset should be visible and marked. Maybe service people know
    of it and can charge you $150 for a board repair when it is just push of
    a button.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From micky@21:1/5 to esp@snet.n on Sun Jan 26 12:42:01 2025
    XPost: sci.electronics.repair, alt.home.repair

    In sci.electronics.repair, on Sun, 26 Jan 2025 12:17:56 -0500, Ed P <esp@snet.n> wrote:

    On 1/26/2025 12:02 PM, micky wrote:
    With email copy to Ed. Remove NONONO to email.

    I posted in another thread about my philips DVDR3575H dvdr with
    harddrive that stopped working 2 or 3 months ago. (I've had medical
    problems since Dec 11, so I've not gotten much done. They are scheduled
    to end or be permanent by March 11. I'm optimistic.)

    The topic here is what happened when I took apart the broken one. Since
    it was totally dead, I expected to find a problem with the power supply.
    I didnt' see anything burned out, and before I got out my meter, I
    looked around and in the middle of another board, iirc the tuner board,
    I found a little switch that looks like the middle ones in the back row
    here:
    https://www.google.com/imgres?q=mini%20push%20button%20switch&imgurl=https%3A%2F%2Fi.ebayimg.com%2F00%2Fs%2FMTYwMFgxNjAw%2Fz%2F~CQAAOSwg-NiIKR4%2F%24_57.JPG%3Fset_id%3D8800005007&imgrefurl=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ebay.com%2Fitm%2F402506084854&docid=
    lTwHaPMd2PG4uM&tbnid=IkOz4CNcM5iAZM&vet=12ahUKEwiUzL-g8JKLAxUckokEHQRPGacQM3oECGUQAA..i&w=1600&h=1600&hcb=2&ved=2ahUKEwiUzL-g8JKLAxUckokEHQRPGacQM3oECGUQAA
    The little black sticks sticking up in the middle are made of plastic or
    rubber, so like Dorothy in the Wizard of Oz or Alice in Wonderland, I
    pushed it down. And the DVDR started working again!!!

    How come they don't mention this in the owners manual for my model, and
    I found a service manual for a similar DVDR that doesn't say a word
    about it either. The switch is labeled Reset
    Sw.50
    I can post the urls for the manuals if you want.

    I haven't connected the output yet because I'd have to connect a RF
    modulator, but it shows On, Play, Rewind, none of which it did before.
    I'm 95% convinced it works as good as before. Unless it fails again?
    Likely? Why do they have this button if they're going to keep it
    secret?

    Have you ever heard of a button like this before?

    Glad to you you back. Hope you have a good resolution to your problem.

    Thank you.

    Seems a reset should be visible and marked. Maybe service people know
    of it and can charge you $150 for a board repair when it is just push of
    a button.

    Maybe.

    BTW, it was a different Ed who doesn't read usenet afaik, but I'm sure
    he's insterested.

    Yes, Cursitor, we need a federal law to put a button like that on
    everything. .

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Cursitor Doom@21:1/5 to All on Sun Jan 26 17:33:03 2025
    XPost: sci.electronics.repair, alt.home.repair

    On Sun, 26 Jan 2025 12:02:09 -0500, micky <NONONOmisc07@fmguy.com>
    wrote:

    With email copy to Ed. Remove NONONO to email.

    I posted in another thread about my philips DVDR3575H dvdr with
    harddrive that stopped working 2 or 3 months ago. (I've had medical
    problems since Dec 11, so I've not gotten much done. They are scheduled
    to end or be permanent by March 11. I'm optimistic.)

    But I did buy another identical dvdr from ebay for 180 dollars (they had
    much cheaper, but the first one lasted me 15 years, and even though the
    one I just bought is also already 15 years old, I still think it will
    last 15 years. See, I'm optimistic.) And he was the only one who
    showed a tv with a picture on it in his photos.

    I put it in and it worked fine for 2 of the 3 tv's I'm using now, but
    one 14" crt tv has much more static when text or commercials come on the >screen than it did before. That is another topic. Anyone have any
    ideas? I'll post details if you do.

    The topic here is what happened when I took apart the broken one. Since
    it was totally dead, I expected to find a problem with the power supply.
    I didnt' see anything burned out, and before I got out my meter, I
    looked around and in the middle of another board, iirc the tuner board,
    I found a little switch that looks like the middle ones in the back row
    here: >https://www.google.com/imgres?q=mini%20push%20button%20switch&imgurl=https%3A%2F%2Fi.ebayimg.com%2F00%2Fs%2FMTYwMFgxNjAw%2Fz%2F~CQAAOSwg-NiIKR4%2F%24_57.JPG%3Fset_id%3D8800005007&imgrefurl=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ebay.com%2Fitm%2F402506084854&docid=
    lTwHaPMd2PG4uM&tbnid=IkOz4CNcM5iAZM&vet=12ahUKEwiUzL-g8JKLAxUckokEHQRPGacQM3oECGUQAA..i&w=1600&h=1600&hcb=2&ved=2ahUKEwiUzL-g8JKLAxUckokEHQRPGacQM3oECGUQAA
    The little black sticks sticking up in the middle are made of plastic or >rubber, so like Dorothy in the Wizard of Oz or Alice in Wonderland, I
    pushed it down. And the DVDR started working again!!!

    How come they don't mention this in the owners manual for my model, and
    I found a service manual for a similar DVDR that doesn't say a word
    about it either. The switch is labeled Reset
    Sw.50
    I can post the urls for the manuals if you want.

    I haven't connected the output yet because I'd have to connect a RF >modulator, but it shows On, Play, Rewind, none of which it did before.
    I'm 95% convinced it works as good as before. Unless it fails again?
    Likely? Why do they have this button if they're going to keep it
    secret?

    Have you ever heard of a button like this before?

    No, but I wish to hell I had one.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Cursitor Doom@21:1/5 to All on Sun Jan 26 18:20:11 2025
    XPost: sci.electronics.repair, alt.home.repair

    On Sun, 26 Jan 2025 12:42:01 -0500, micky <NONONOmisc07@fmguy.com>
    wrote:

    In sci.electronics.repair, on Sun, 26 Jan 2025 12:17:56 -0500, Ed P ><esp@snet.n> wrote:

    On 1/26/2025 12:02 PM, micky wrote:
    With email copy to Ed. Remove NONONO to email.

    I posted in another thread about my philips DVDR3575H dvdr with
    harddrive that stopped working 2 or 3 months ago. (I've had medical
    problems since Dec 11, so I've not gotten much done. They are scheduled
    to end or be permanent by March 11. I'm optimistic.)

    The topic here is what happened when I took apart the broken one. Since
    it was totally dead, I expected to find a problem with the power supply. >>> I didnt' see anything burned out, and before I got out my meter, I
    looked around and in the middle of another board, iirc the tuner board,
    I found a little switch that looks like the middle ones in the back row
    here:
    https://www.google.com/imgres?q=mini%20push%20button%20switch&imgurl=https%3A%2F%2Fi.ebayimg.com%2F00%2Fs%2FMTYwMFgxNjAw%2Fz%2F~CQAAOSwg-NiIKR4%2F%24_57.JPG%3Fset_id%3D8800005007&imgrefurl=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ebay.com%2Fitm%2F402506084854&docid=
    lTwHaPMd2PG4uM&tbnid=IkOz4CNcM5iAZM&vet=12ahUKEwiUzL-g8JKLAxUckokEHQRPGacQM3oECGUQAA..i&w=1600&h=1600&hcb=2&ved=2ahUKEwiUzL-g8JKLAxUckokEHQRPGacQM3oECGUQAA
    The little black sticks sticking up in the middle are made of plastic or >>> rubber, so like Dorothy in the Wizard of Oz or Alice in Wonderland, I
    pushed it down. And the DVDR started working again!!!

    How come they don't mention this in the owners manual for my model, and
    I found a service manual for a similar DVDR that doesn't say a word
    about it either. The switch is labeled Reset
    Sw.50
    I can post the urls for the manuals if you want.

    I haven't connected the output yet because I'd have to connect a RF
    modulator, but it shows On, Play, Rewind, none of which it did before.
    I'm 95% convinced it works as good as before. Unless it fails again?
    Likely? Why do they have this button if they're going to keep it
    secret?

    Have you ever heard of a button like this before?

    Glad to you you back. Hope you have a good resolution to your problem.

    Thank you.

    Seems a reset should be visible and marked. Maybe service people know
    of it and can charge you $150 for a board repair when it is just push of
    a button.

    Maybe.

    BTW, it was a different Ed who doesn't read usenet afaik, but I'm sure
    he's insterested.

    Yes, Cursitor, we need a federal law to put a button like that on
    everything. .

    That would be a major step forward for sure.
    Is it the laser diodes in these things getting weaker over time that's
    a principal cause of failure in these drives?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jeff Liebermann@21:1/5 to All on Sun Jan 26 15:54:34 2025
    XPost: sci.electronics.repair, alt.home.repair

    On Sun, 26 Jan 2025 17:33:03 +0000, Cursitor Doom <cd@notformail.com>
    wrote:

    On Sun, 26 Jan 2025 12:02:09 -0500, micky <NONONOmisc07@fmguy.com>
    wrote:
    (...)
    Have you ever heard of a button like this before?

    No, but I wish to hell I had one.

    On behalf of hell, I'm here to answer your wishes. These buttons are
    not quite what you want, but should make suitable substitutes: <https://www.google.com/search?num=10&q=destruct%20button&udm=2> <https://www.google.com/search?q=do%20not%20push%20&udm=2>
    You only need the button and not the switch. The switch only supports
    the button and otherwise does nothing useful.

    Incidentally, it's acceptable to pray for a miracle. However, relying
    on a miracle to make your project work is not acceptable.

    --
    Jeff Liebermann jeffl@cruzio.com
    PO Box 272 http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
    Ben Lomond CA 95005-0272
    Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Carlos E.R.@21:1/5 to micky on Mon Jan 27 02:02:30 2025
    XPost: sci.electronics.repair, alt.home.repair

    On 2025-01-26 18:02, micky wrote:
    Why do they have this button if they're going to keep it
    secret?

    To charge for the repair. Yes, I have seen this before, in some
    expensive machine. They told us in training about the secret reset button.

    --
    Cheers, Carlos.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Cursitor Doom@21:1/5 to All on Mon Jan 27 00:23:33 2025
    XPost: sci.electronics.repair, alt.home.repair

    On Sun, 26 Jan 2025 15:54:34 -0800, Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@cruzio.com>
    wrote:

    On Sun, 26 Jan 2025 17:33:03 +0000, Cursitor Doom <cd@notformail.com>
    wrote:

    On Sun, 26 Jan 2025 12:02:09 -0500, micky <NONONOmisc07@fmguy.com>
    wrote:
    (...)
    Have you ever heard of a button like this before?

    No, but I wish to hell I had one.

    On behalf of hell, I'm here to answer your wishes. These buttons are
    not quite what you want, but should make suitable substitutes: ><https://www.google.com/search?num=10&q=destruct%20button&udm=2> ><https://www.google.com/search?q=do%20not%20push%20&udm=2>
    You only need the button and not the switch. The switch only supports
    the button and otherwise does nothing useful.

    Incidentally, it's acceptable to pray for a miracle. However, relying
    on a miracle to make your project work is not acceptable.

    Dang it, Jeff, that last suggestion of yours is my go-to principal
    design technique. :(

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jeff Liebermann@21:1/5 to All on Sun Jan 26 18:30:54 2025
    XPost: sci.electronics.repair, alt.home.repair

    On Mon, 27 Jan 2025 00:23:33 +0000, Cursitor Doom <cd@notformail.com>
    wrote:

    On Sun, 26 Jan 2025 15:54:34 -0800, Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@cruzio.com>
    wrote:

    On Sun, 26 Jan 2025 17:33:03 +0000, Cursitor Doom <cd@notformail.com> >>wrote:

    On Sun, 26 Jan 2025 12:02:09 -0500, micky <NONONOmisc07@fmguy.com>
    wrote:
    (...)
    Have you ever heard of a button like this before?

    No, but I wish to hell I had one.

    On behalf of hell, I'm here to answer your wishes. These buttons are
    not quite what you want, but should make suitable substitutes: >><https://www.google.com/search?num=10&q=destruct%20button&udm=2> >><https://www.google.com/search?q=do%20not%20push%20&udm=2>
    You only need the button and not the switch. The switch only supports
    the button and otherwise does nothing useful.

    Incidentally, it's acceptable to pray for a miracle. However, relying
    on a miracle to make your project work is not acceptable.

    Dang it, Jeff, that last suggestion of yours is my go-to principal
    design technique. :(

    Miraculous design worked well for biblical prototypes but not so well
    meeting modern standards and safety requirements. Fortunately,
    miraculous design might soon be replaced by AI and other forms of
    traditional magic which does not require a miracle to function. If
    you are uncertain as to which approach is best for whatever you're
    building, I suggest you consider reverse engineering, patent
    infringement, cloning the competition, changing the specs, faking the
    test data, bribing the inspector and other modern engineering
    practices. It also helps to have a designated culprit or scapegoat
    available. Good luck.



    --
    Jeff Liebermann jeffl@cruzio.com
    PO Box 272 http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
    Ben Lomond CA 95005-0272
    Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Martin Brown@21:1/5 to Carlos E.R. on Mon Jan 27 10:35:56 2025
    XPost: sci.electronics.repair, alt.home.repair

    On 27/01/2025 01:02, Carlos E.R. wrote:
    On 2025-01-26 18:02, micky wrote:
      Why do they have this button if they're going to keep it
    secret?

    To charge for the repair. Yes, I have seen this before, in some
    expensive machine. They told us in training about the secret reset button.

    Or the cunningly hidden additional thermal cutout or fuse.

    It is what "repair cafes" are for - to mend things that are in fact
    perfectly OK but have been disabled by designed in obsolescence.


    --
    Martin Brown

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Greta Thongturd@21:1/5 to micky on Mon Jan 27 06:53:49 2025
    XPost: sci.electronics.repair, alt.home.repair

    micky wrote:
    The switch is labeled Reset
    Sw.50
    [snip]

    Have you ever heard of a button like this before?

    Yah, and some of them have a very specific finger dance to get it to reset.

    Push and hold the reset button while plugging in the power cord until the green light flashes red 5 times.
    Release the reset button for 60 seconds then press the wifi button until the yellow led flashes red.
    Warning: Failure to follow these directions exactly will turn your $500 plastic piece of crap into a forever brick.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Carlos E.R.@21:1/5 to Greta Thongturd on Mon Jan 27 13:15:05 2025
    XPost: sci.electronics.repair, alt.home.repair

    On 2025-01-27 12:53, Greta Thongturd wrote:
    micky wrote:
    The switch is labeled    Reset
                                                 Sw.50
    [snip]

    Have you ever heard of a button like this before?

    Yah, and some of them have a very specific finger dance to get it to reset.

    Push and hold the reset button while plugging in the power cord until
    the green light flashes red 5 times.
    Release the reset button for 60 seconds then press the wifi button until
    the yellow led flashes red.
    Warning: Failure to follow these directions exactly will turn your $500 plastic piece of crap into a forever brick.

    The dances are there usually when there is no dedicated reset button.

    --
    Cheers, Carlos.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Martin Brown@21:1/5 to Greta Thongturd on Mon Jan 27 13:11:29 2025
    XPost: sci.electronics.repair, alt.home.repair

    On 27/01/2025 11:53, Greta Thongturd wrote:
    micky wrote:
    The switch is labeled    Reset
                                                 Sw.50
    [snip]

    Have you ever heard of a button like this before?

    Yah, and some of them have a very specific finger dance to get it to reset.

    Push and hold the reset button while plugging in the power cord until
    the green light flashes red 5 times.
    Release the reset button for 60 seconds then press the wifi button until
    the yellow led flashes red.

    I recall one particularly painful reset method on an Andriod device that required holding in the tiny on/off switch and volume-down buttons for
    120s. Your fingers start to go numb after about 90s.

    Warning: Failure to follow these directions exactly will turn your $500 plastic piece of crap into a forever brick.

    Some things do that automatically.

    Various smart speakers and some high end internet tuners for example
    when the protocols are changed and the makers CBA to support old kit.

    --
    Martin Brown

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From micky@21:1/5 to E.R." on Mon Jan 27 11:34:24 2025
    XPost: sci.electronics.repair, alt.home.repair

    In sci.electronics.repair, on Mon, 27 Jan 2025 02:02:30 +0100, "Carlos
    E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> wrote:

    On 2025-01-26 18:02, micky wrote:
    Why do they have this button (that made my DVDR work when it was apparently dead) if they're going to keep it
    secret?

    To charge for the repair. Yes, I have seen this before, in some
    expensive machine. They told us in training about the secret reset button.

    That's incredible. (well, not really, since I believe you, so it must be credible.)

    Where was this training, in the US or Spain? And if they tell people
    like you, what prevents the people they tell from telling everyone else?
    I guess they have to tell someone or it wouldn't be of any value, but
    I'd think they'd be worried everyone not doing repairs would be annoyed
    when they heard about this.

    What made it break when it did, about 15 years after I bought it. Is it
    on a timer? Will it break again in another 15 years? Or maybe it's operational time, not calendar time. For maybe 10 years I recorded 3
    hours a day and played back 3 hours a day. plus some more time watching
    what wasn't recorded. 3 or 4 years I left it running (and the hard
    drive spinning I guess) 4 or 5 days of the week. So it was running for
    5 or 6 years total, I think. That's not very much imo, compared to 15
    years elapsed time.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Carlos E.R.@21:1/5 to micky on Mon Jan 27 21:10:24 2025
    XPost: sci.electronics.repair, alt.home.repair

    On 2025-01-27 17:34, micky wrote:
    In sci.electronics.repair, on Mon, 27 Jan 2025 02:02:30 +0100, "Carlos
    E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> wrote:

    On 2025-01-26 18:02, micky wrote:
    Why do they have this button (that made my DVDR work when it was apparently dead) if they're going to keep it
    secret?

    To charge for the repair. Yes, I have seen this before, in some
    expensive machine. They told us in training about the secret reset button.

    That's incredible. (well, not really, since I believe you, so it must be credible.)

    Where was this training, in the US or Spain?

    Both :-)

    It was an international USA company. I'm not going to say the culprit,
    that product seems to be still active (which surprises me). Ah, no, the
    current supplier says it is EOL.

    :-D

    And if they tell people
    like you, what prevents the people they tell from telling everyone else?
    I guess they have to tell someone or it wouldn't be of any value, but
    I'd think they'd be worried everyone not doing repairs would be annoyed
    when they heard about this.

    What made it break when it did, about 15 years after I bought it. Is it
    on a timer? Will it break again in another 15 years? Or maybe it's operational time, not calendar time. For maybe 10 years I recorded 3
    hours a day and played back 3 hours a day. plus some more time watching
    what wasn't recorded. 3 or 4 years I left it running (and the hard
    drive spinning I guess) 4 or 5 days of the week. So it was running for
    5 or 6 years total, I think. That's not very much imo, compared to 15
    years elapsed time.

    Who knows. But my guess is that any machine that has some sort of
    computer inside must have some reset method.



    --
    Cheers, Carlos.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From john larkin@21:1/5 to greta.thongturd@nazi-climate-nutter on Mon Jan 27 13:45:51 2025
    XPost: sci.electronics.repair, alt.home.repair

    On Mon, 27 Jan 2025 06:53:49 -0500, Greta Thongturd <greta.thongturd@nazi-climate-nutters.wef> wrote:

    micky wrote:
    The switch is labeled Reset
    Sw.50
    [snip]

    Have you ever heard of a button like this before?

    Yah, and some of them have a very specific finger dance to get it to reset.

    Push and hold the reset button while plugging in the power cord until the green light flashes red 5 times.
    Release the reset button for 60 seconds then press the wifi button until the yellow led flashes red.
    Warning: Failure to follow these directions exactly will turn your $500 plastic piece of crap into a forever brick.

    We recently did a box that uses the Raspberry Pi RP2040 cpu chip. The
    Pico board has two pushbuttons, reset and boot. We have a single push
    button accessed from outside our box, with a toothpick or something. A
    1-second push is reset and a 10-second push is boot, where the thing
    goes into USB memory stick mode, for code upgrades.

    A user can put a sticker over the pushbutton hole if he wants. Some
    do.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From john larkin@21:1/5 to '''newspam'''@nonad.co.uk on Mon Jan 27 13:56:59 2025
    XPost: sci.electronics.repair, alt.home.repair

    On Mon, 27 Jan 2025 13:11:29 +0000, Martin Brown
    <'''newspam'''@nonad.co.uk> wrote:

    On 27/01/2025 11:53, Greta Thongturd wrote:
    micky wrote:
    The switch is labeled    Reset
                                                 Sw.50
    [snip]

    Have you ever heard of a button like this before?

    Yah, and some of them have a very specific finger dance to get it to reset. >>
    Push and hold the reset button while plugging in the power cord until
    the green light flashes red 5 times.
    Release the reset button for 60 seconds then press the wifi button until
    the yellow led flashes red.

    I recall one particularly painful reset method on an Andriod device that >required holding in the tiny on/off switch and volume-down buttons for
    120s. Your fingers start to go numb after about 90s.

    Warning: Failure to follow these directions exactly will turn your $500
    plastic piece of crap into a forever brick.

    Some things do that automatically.

    Various smart speakers and some high end internet tuners for example
    when the protocols are changed and the makers CBA to support old kit.

    We have a horrible new Panasonic microwave oven. The BEEP is
    ear-splitting. The procedure to silence it is complex, and only works
    if the door is open.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Mark Lloyd@21:1/5 to john larkin on Tue Jan 28 17:32:01 2025
    XPost: sci.electronics.repair, alt.home.repair

    On Mon, 27 Jan 2025 13:56:59 -0800, john larkin wrote:

    [snip]

    We have a horrible new Panasonic microwave oven. The BEEP is
    ear-splitting. The procedure to silence it is complex, and only works if
    the door is open.

    Does it keep forgetting it was silenced, so you have to do this procedure multiple times?

    --
    Mark Lloyd
    http://notstupid.us/

    "In nature there are neither rewards nor punishments; there are
    consequences." [Robert Ingersoll]

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jeroen Belleman@21:1/5 to Mark Lloyd on Tue Jan 28 20:04:05 2025
    XPost: sci.electronics.repair, alt.home.repair

    On 1/28/25 18:32, Mark Lloyd wrote:
    On Mon, 27 Jan 2025 13:56:59 -0800, john larkin wrote:

    [snip]

    We have a horrible new Panasonic microwave oven. The BEEP is
    ear-splitting. The procedure to silence it is complex, and only works if
    the door is open.

    Does it keep forgetting it was silenced, so you have to do this procedure multiple times?


    On one occasion, I muted an obnoxious beeper by stuffing
    chewing gum into it. There! Problem solved.

    Jeroen Belleman

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From john larkin@21:1/5 to jeroen@nospam.please on Wed Jan 29 08:07:28 2025
    XPost: sci.electronics.repair, alt.home.repair

    On Tue, 28 Jan 2025 20:04:05 +0100, Jeroen Belleman
    <jeroen@nospam.please> wrote:

    On 1/28/25 18:32, Mark Lloyd wrote:
    On Mon, 27 Jan 2025 13:56:59 -0800, john larkin wrote:

    [snip]

    We have a horrible new Panasonic microwave oven. The BEEP is
    ear-splitting. The procedure to silence it is complex, and only works if >>> the door is open.

    Does it keep forgetting it was silenced, so you have to do this procedure
    multiple times?


    On one occasion, I muted an obnoxious beeper by stuffing
    chewing gum into it. There! Problem solved.

    Jeroen Belleman

    I break the piezo buzzer, if I can get at it.

    We should arrest whoever invented piezo buzzers. Put him in a prison
    cell with 100 piezos.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Liz Tuddenham@21:1/5 to john larkin on Wed Jan 29 16:42:50 2025
    john larkin <JL@gct.com> wrote:

    On Tue, 28 Jan 2025 20:04:05 +0100, Jeroen Belleman
    <jeroen@nospam.please> wrote:

    On 1/28/25 18:32, Mark Lloyd wrote:
    On Mon, 27 Jan 2025 13:56:59 -0800, john larkin wrote:

    [snip]

    We have a horrible new Panasonic microwave oven. The BEEP is
    ear-splitting. The procedure to silence it is complex, and only works if >>> the door is open.

    Does it keep forgetting it was silenced, so you have to do this procedure >> multiple times?


    On one occasion, I muted an obnoxious beeper by stuffing
    chewing gum into it. There! Problem solved.

    Jeroen Belleman

    I break the piezo buzzer, if I can get at it.

    We should arrest whoever invented piezo buzzers. Put him in a prison
    cell with 100 piezos.

    My microwave oven has a little metal gong, When the timer has run back
    to zero, it releases a tiny hammer and the gong goes "ping!" Perhaps
    one day they will re-invent this idea and hail it as a great improvment.


    --
    ~ Liz Tuddenham ~
    (Remove the ".invalid"s and add ".co.uk" to reply)
    www.poppyrecords.co.uk

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From john larkin@21:1/5 to Liz Tuddenham on Wed Jan 29 08:56:13 2025
    On Wed, 29 Jan 2025 16:42:50 +0000, liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid
    (Liz Tuddenham) wrote:

    john larkin <JL@gct.com> wrote:

    On Tue, 28 Jan 2025 20:04:05 +0100, Jeroen Belleman
    <jeroen@nospam.please> wrote:

    On 1/28/25 18:32, Mark Lloyd wrote:
    On Mon, 27 Jan 2025 13:56:59 -0800, john larkin wrote:

    [snip]

    We have a horrible new Panasonic microwave oven. The BEEP is
    ear-splitting. The procedure to silence it is complex, and only works if >> >>> the door is open.

    Does it keep forgetting it was silenced, so you have to do this procedure >> >> multiple times?


    On one occasion, I muted an obnoxious beeper by stuffing
    chewing gum into it. There! Problem solved.

    Jeroen Belleman

    I break the piezo buzzer, if I can get at it.

    We should arrest whoever invented piezo buzzers. Put him in a prison
    cell with 100 piezos.

    My microwave oven has a little metal gong, When the timer has run back
    to zero, it releases a tiny hammer and the gong goes "ping!" Perhaps
    one day they will re-invent this idea and hail it as a great improvment.

    How about a knob that you turn, the more you turn it the longer the
    microwave runs.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Liz Tuddenham@21:1/5 to john larkin on Wed Jan 29 17:22:20 2025
    john larkin <JL@gct.com> wrote:

    On Wed, 29 Jan 2025 16:42:50 +0000, liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid
    (Liz Tuddenham) wrote:

    john larkin <JL@gct.com> wrote:

    On Tue, 28 Jan 2025 20:04:05 +0100, Jeroen Belleman
    <jeroen@nospam.please> wrote:

    On 1/28/25 18:32, Mark Lloyd wrote:
    On Mon, 27 Jan 2025 13:56:59 -0800, john larkin wrote:

    [snip]

    We have a horrible new Panasonic microwave oven. The BEEP is
    ear-splitting. The procedure to silence it is complex, and only
    works if the door is open.

    Does it keep forgetting it was silenced, so you have to do this
    procedure multiple times?


    On one occasion, I muted an obnoxious beeper by stuffing
    chewing gum into it. There! Problem solved.

    Jeroen Belleman

    I break the piezo buzzer, if I can get at it.

    We should arrest whoever invented piezo buzzers. Put him in a prison
    cell with 100 piezos.

    My microwave oven has a little metal gong, When the timer has run back
    to zero, it releases a tiny hammer and the gong goes "ping!" Perhaps
    one day they will re-invent this idea and hail it as a great improvment.

    How about a knob that you turn, the more you turn it the longer the
    microwave runs.

    I'm sorry to tell you that has already been thought of - and my
    microwave oven is already equipped with it.

    It has another ingenious feature which I haven't seen anywhere else:
    The timer motor is wired to the magnetron circuit so that it only runs
    when the magnetron is energised. The dial behind the knob is
    dual-marked; one set of markings shows the sum of the actual heating
    time and the other set shows how long this takes in real time when the magnetron is pulsed at lower power settings.

    Clever, eh!!

    --
    ~ Liz Tuddenham ~
    (Remove the ".invalid"s and add ".co.uk" to reply)
    www.poppyrecords.co.uk

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Cursitor Doom@21:1/5 to All on Wed Jan 29 18:29:41 2025
    XPost: sci.electronics.repair, alt.home.repair

    On Sun, 26 Jan 2025 18:30:54 -0800, Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@cruzio.com>
    wrote:

    On Mon, 27 Jan 2025 00:23:33 +0000, Cursitor Doom <cd@notformail.com>
    wrote:

    On Sun, 26 Jan 2025 15:54:34 -0800, Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@cruzio.com> >>wrote:

    On Sun, 26 Jan 2025 17:33:03 +0000, Cursitor Doom <cd@notformail.com> >>>wrote:

    On Sun, 26 Jan 2025 12:02:09 -0500, micky <NONONOmisc07@fmguy.com> >>>>wrote:
    (...)
    Have you ever heard of a button like this before?

    No, but I wish to hell I had one.

    On behalf of hell, I'm here to answer your wishes. These buttons are
    not quite what you want, but should make suitable substitutes: >>><https://www.google.com/search?num=10&q=destruct%20button&udm=2> >>><https://www.google.com/search?q=do%20not%20push%20&udm=2>
    You only need the button and not the switch. The switch only supports >>>the button and otherwise does nothing useful.

    Incidentally, it's acceptable to pray for a miracle. However, relying
    on a miracle to make your project work is not acceptable.

    Dang it, Jeff, that last suggestion of yours is my go-to principal
    design technique. :(

    Miraculous design worked well for biblical prototypes but not so well
    meeting modern standards and safety requirements. Fortunately,
    miraculous design might soon be replaced by AI and other forms of
    traditional magic which does not require a miracle to function. If
    you are uncertain as to which approach is best for whatever you're
    building, I suggest you consider reverse engineering, patent
    infringement, cloning the competition, changing the specs, faking the
    test data, bribing the inspector and other modern engineering
    practices. It also helps to have a designated culprit or scapegoat >available. Good luck.

    Thanks, Jeff!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Cursitor Doom@21:1/5 to greta.thongturd@nazi-climate-nutter on Wed Jan 29 18:35:12 2025
    XPost: sci.electronics.repair, alt.home.repair

    On Mon, 27 Jan 2025 06:53:49 -0500, Greta Thongturd <greta.thongturd@nazi-climate-nutters.wef> wrote:

    micky wrote:
    The switch is labeled Reset
    Sw.50
    [snip]

    Have you ever heard of a button like this before?

    Yah, and some of them have a very specific finger dance to get it to reset.

    Push and hold the reset button while plugging in the power cord until the green light flashes red 5 times.
    Release the reset button for 60 seconds then press the wifi button until the yellow led flashes red.
    Warning: Failure to follow these directions exactly will turn your $500 plastic piece of crap into a forever brick.

    I would never, ever buy anything from a company who used such tactics
    to screw customers over. For a similar reason, I would never buy a VW
    car after it emerged they were purposlely falsifying their emissions
    tests by a similar sort of scheme.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From john larkin@21:1/5 to All on Wed Jan 29 15:37:54 2025
    XPost: sci.electronics.repair, alt.home.repair

    On Sun, 26 Jan 2025 18:30:54 -0800, Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@cruzio.com>
    wrote:

    On Mon, 27 Jan 2025 00:23:33 +0000, Cursitor Doom <cd@notformail.com>
    wrote:

    On Sun, 26 Jan 2025 15:54:34 -0800, Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@cruzio.com> >>wrote:

    On Sun, 26 Jan 2025 17:33:03 +0000, Cursitor Doom <cd@notformail.com> >>>wrote:

    On Sun, 26 Jan 2025 12:02:09 -0500, micky <NONONOmisc07@fmguy.com> >>>>wrote:
    (...)
    Have you ever heard of a button like this before?

    No, but I wish to hell I had one.

    On behalf of hell, I'm here to answer your wishes. These buttons are
    not quite what you want, but should make suitable substitutes: >>><https://www.google.com/search?num=10&q=destruct%20button&udm=2> >>><https://www.google.com/search?q=do%20not%20push%20&udm=2>
    You only need the button and not the switch. The switch only supports >>>the button and otherwise does nothing useful.

    Incidentally, it's acceptable to pray for a miracle. However, relying
    on a miracle to make your project work is not acceptable.

    Dang it, Jeff, that last suggestion of yours is my go-to principal
    design technique. :(

    Miraculous design worked well for biblical prototypes but not so well
    meeting modern standards and safety requirements. Fortunately,
    miraculous design might soon be replaced by AI and other forms of
    traditional magic which does not require a miracle to function. If
    you are uncertain as to which approach is best for whatever you're
    building, I suggest you consider reverse engineering, patent
    infringement, cloning the competition, changing the specs, faking the
    test data, bribing the inspector and other modern engineering
    practices. It also helps to have a designated culprit or scapegoat >available. Good luck.

    Amazingly, Flux is still in business.

    https://www.flux.ai/p/

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From danny burstein@21:1/5 to micky on Thu Jan 30 04:44:13 2025
    XPost: sci.electronics.repair, alt.home.repair

    In <5i0mpjh61l9deqq5pij0a86049tqq18cna@4ax.com> micky <NONONOmisc07@fmguy.com> writes:

    [snip]

    Is there a tiny hole in the case above that switch for usimg as paper
    clip to reset the device?

    No, nothing like that. Like most VCRs, DVD players, DVDRs, amplifiers,
    One big piece of sheet metal covering the top with no holes, no writing.
    I wonder how it decides when to break?

    Two days after the warranty expires, of course.


    --
    _____________________________________________________
    Knowledge may be power, but communications is the key
    dannyb@panix.com
    [to foil spammers, my address has been double rot-13 encoded]

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From micky@21:1/5 to bobnospam@gmail.com on Wed Jan 29 23:41:08 2025
    XPost: sci.electronics.repair, alt.home.repair

    In sci.electronics.repair, on Wed, 29 Jan 2025 10:38:40 -0800, Bob F <bobnospam@gmail.com> wrote:

    On 1/26/2025 9:42 AM, micky wrote:
    In sci.electronics.repair, on Sun, 26 Jan 2025 12:17:56 -0500, Ed P
    <esp@snet.n> wrote:

    On 1/26/2025 12:02 PM, micky wrote:
    With email copy to Ed. Remove NONONO to email.

    I posted in another thread about my philips DVDR3575H dvdr with
    harddrive that stopped working 2 or 3 months ago. (I've had medical
    problems since Dec 11, so I've not gotten much done. They are scheduled >>>> to end or be permanent by March 11. I'm optimistic.)

    The topic here is what happened when I took apart the broken one. Since >>>> it was totally dead, I expected to find a problem with the power supply. >>>> I didnt' see anything burned out, and before I got out my meter, I
    looked around and in the middle of another board, iirc the tuner board, >>>> I found a little switch that looks like the middle ones in the back row >>>> here:
    https://www.google.com/imgres?q=mini%20push%20button%20switch&imgurl=https%3A%2F%2Fi.ebayimg.com%2F00%2Fs%2FMTYwMFgxNjAw%2Fz%2F~CQAAOSwg-NiIKR4%2F%24_57.JPG%3Fset_id%3D8800005007&imgrefurl=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ebay.com%2Fitm%2F402506084854&docid=
    lTwHaPMd2PG4uM&tbnid=IkOz4CNcM5iAZM&vet=12ahUKEwiUzL-g8JKLAxUckokEHQRPGacQM3oECGUQAA..i&w=1600&h=1600&hcb=2&ved=2ahUKEwiUzL-g8JKLAxUckokEHQRPGacQM3oECGUQAA
    The little black sticks sticking up in the middle are made of plastic or >>>> rubber, so like Dorothy in the Wizard of Oz or Alice in Wonderland, I
    pushed it down. And the DVDR started working again!!!

    How come they don't mention this in the owners manual for my model, and >>>> I found a service manual for a similar DVDR that doesn't say a word
    about it either. The switch is labeled Reset
    Sw.50
    I can post the urls for the manuals if you want.

    I haven't connected the output yet because I'd have to connect a RF
    modulator, but it shows On, Play, Rewind, none of which it did before. >>>> I'm 95% convinced it works as good as before. Unless it fails again?
    Likely? Why do they have this button if they're going to keep it
    secret?

    Have you ever heard of a button like this before?

    Glad to you you back. Hope you have a good resolution to your problem.

    Thank you.

    Seems a reset should be visible and marked. Maybe service people know
    of it and can charge you $150 for a board repair when it is just push of >>> a button.

    Maybe.

    BTW, it was a different Ed who doesn't read usenet afaik, but I'm sure
    he's insterested.

    Yes, Cursitor, we need a federal law to put a button like that on
    everything. .

    Is there a tiny hole in the case above that switch for usimg as paper
    clip to reset the device?

    No, nothing like that. Like most VCRs, DVD players, DVDRs, amplifiers,
    One big piece of sheet metal covering the top with no holes, no writing.
    I wonder how it decides when to break?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Allodoxaphobia@21:1/5 to john larkin on Thu Jan 30 14:47:27 2025
    XPost: sci.electronics.repair, alt.home.repair

    On Wed, 29 Jan 2025 08:07:28 -0800, john larkin wrote:
    On Tue, 28 Jan 2025 20:04:05 +0100, Jeroen Belleman wrote:
    On 1/28/25 18:32, Mark Lloyd wrote:
    On Mon, 27 Jan 2025 13:56:59 -0800, john larkin wrote:

    [snip]

    We have a horrible new Panasonic microwave oven. The BEEP is
    ear-splitting. The procedure to silence it is complex, and only
    works if the door is open.

    On one occasion, I muted an obnoxious beeper by stuffing
    chewing gum into it. There! Problem solved.

    I break the piezo buzzer, if I can get at it.

    We should arrest whoever invented piezo buzzers.
    Put him in a prison cell with 100 piezos.

    Additionaly, if you have 'normal' hearing loss, those piezo buzzers
    cannot be heard without hearing aids. I don't wear hearing aids
    to bed -- so smoke and carbon monoxide alarms will never awaken me.
    We had a CO 'incident' several years ago, and my wife heard the alarm.
    Not me. I can be standing in front of the microwave and I won't know
    my coffee is hot until the "END" lights up.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From john larkin@21:1/5 to All on Thu Jan 30 10:10:12 2025
    XPost: sci.electronics.repair, alt.home.repair

    On 30 Jan 2025 14:47:27 GMT, Allodoxaphobia <trepidation@example.net>
    wrote:

    On Wed, 29 Jan 2025 08:07:28 -0800, john larkin wrote:
    On Tue, 28 Jan 2025 20:04:05 +0100, Jeroen Belleman wrote:
    On 1/28/25 18:32, Mark Lloyd wrote:
    On Mon, 27 Jan 2025 13:56:59 -0800, john larkin wrote:

    [snip]

    We have a horrible new Panasonic microwave oven. The BEEP is
    ear-splitting. The procedure to silence it is complex, and only
    works if the door is open.

    On one occasion, I muted an obnoxious beeper by stuffing
    chewing gum into it. There! Problem solved.

    I break the piezo buzzer, if I can get at it.

    We should arrest whoever invented piezo buzzers.
    Put him in a prison cell with 100 piezos.

    Additionaly, if you have 'normal' hearing loss, those piezo buzzers
    cannot be heard without hearing aids. I don't wear hearing aids
    to bed -- so smoke and carbon monoxide alarms will never awaken me.
    We had a CO 'incident' several years ago, and my wife heard the alarm.
    Not me. I can be standing in front of the microwave and I won't know
    my coffee is hot until the "END" lights up.

    Microwaves usually have a fan that makes lots of low frequency noise.
    They don't really need a buzzer.

    Piezos are cheap. For a few cents more they could use a speaker and
    give users a choice of sounds.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jeff Liebermann@21:1/5 to All on Thu Jan 30 15:09:22 2025
    XPost: sci.electronics.repair, alt.home.repair

    On Wed, 29 Jan 2025 23:41:08 -0500, micky <NONONOmisc07@fmguy.com>
    wrote:

    In sci.electronics.repair, on Wed, 29 Jan 2025 10:38:40 -0800, Bob F ><bobnospam@gmail.com> wrote:
    Is there a tiny hole in the case above that switch for usimg as paper
    clip to reset the device?

    No, nothing like that. Like most VCRs, DVD players, DVDRs, amplifiers,
    One big piece of sheet metal covering the top with no holes, no writing.
    I wonder how it decides when to break?

    Several ways to determine when to self-destruct:

    1. Warranty timer. The timer records how many elapsed days between
    when power was first applied and the current date. When the timer
    shows 110% of the warranty period, it declares a fault or failure. The
    extra 10% is to deal with errors in the timer.

    2. Predicted use. The "chip" in many inkjet printer cartridges is a
    good example. The manufacturer decrees that the inkjet cartridge
    should last 1,000 pages. When the chip counts 1,001 printed pages, it
    ceases printing and produces a difficult to decode error message. It's
    much the same with laser toner carts and drums. With older iPhone
    batteries, the clock was slowed down to simulate the effects of an
    aging battery.

    3. Predictive QA. Estimating the length of time a product and its
    individual components might last is calculated by the QA department.
    If a component survives longer than the approved warranty period, the
    component is subjected to a "cost reduction", which reduces the
    component lifetime, quality and cost. If this ritual is performed
    often enough, all the components in the product will fail almost simultaneously.

    The actual length of time or number of operations before
    self-destruction is set by the manufactory marketing department.

    --
    Jeff Liebermann jeffl@cruzio.com
    PO Box 272 http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
    Ben Lomond CA 95005-0272
    Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Cursitor Doom@21:1/5 to All on Fri Jan 31 19:32:42 2025
    XPost: sci.electronics.repair, alt.home.repair

    On Thu, 30 Jan 2025 15:09:22 -0800, Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@cruzio.com>
    wrote:

    On Wed, 29 Jan 2025 23:41:08 -0500, micky <NONONOmisc07@fmguy.com>
    wrote:

    In sci.electronics.repair, on Wed, 29 Jan 2025 10:38:40 -0800, Bob F >><bobnospam@gmail.com> wrote:
    Is there a tiny hole in the case above that switch for usimg as paper >>>clip to reset the device?

    No, nothing like that. Like most VCRs, DVD players, DVDRs, amplifiers,
    One big piece of sheet metal covering the top with no holes, no writing.
    I wonder how it decides when to break?

    Several ways to determine when to self-destruct:

    1. Warranty timer. The timer records how many elapsed days between
    when power was first applied and the current date. When the timer
    shows 110% of the warranty period, it declares a fault or failure. The
    extra 10% is to deal with errors in the timer.

    2. Predicted use. The "chip" in many inkjet printer cartridges is a
    good example. The manufacturer decrees that the inkjet cartridge
    should last 1,000 pages. When the chip counts 1,001 printed pages, it
    ceases printing and produces a difficult to decode error message. It's
    much the same with laser toner carts and drums. With older iPhone
    batteries, the clock was slowed down to simulate the effects of an
    aging battery.

    3. Predictive QA. Estimating the length of time a product and its >individual components might last is calculated by the QA department.
    If a component survives longer than the approved warranty period, the >component is subjected to a "cost reduction", which reduces the
    component lifetime, quality and cost. If this ritual is performed
    often enough, all the components in the product will fail almost >simultaneously.

    The actual length of time or number of operations before
    self-destruction is set by the manufactory marketing department.

    Any companies we might have heard of been found out doing this, Jeff?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From john larkin@21:1/5 to All on Fri Jan 31 12:23:06 2025
    XPost: sci.electronics.repair, alt.home.repair

    On Thu, 30 Jan 2025 15:09:22 -0800, Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@cruzio.com>
    wrote:

    On Wed, 29 Jan 2025 23:41:08 -0500, micky <NONONOmisc07@fmguy.com>
    wrote:

    In sci.electronics.repair, on Wed, 29 Jan 2025 10:38:40 -0800, Bob F >><bobnospam@gmail.com> wrote:
    Is there a tiny hole in the case above that switch for usimg as paper >>>clip to reset the device?

    No, nothing like that. Like most VCRs, DVD players, DVDRs, amplifiers,
    One big piece of sheet metal covering the top with no holes, no writing.
    I wonder how it decides when to break?

    Several ways to determine when to self-destruct:

    1. Warranty timer. The timer records how many elapsed days between
    when power was first applied and the current date. When the timer
    shows 110% of the warranty period, it declares a fault or failure. The
    extra 10% is to deal with errors in the timer.

    2. Predicted use. The "chip" in many inkjet printer cartridges is a
    good example. The manufacturer decrees that the inkjet cartridge
    should last 1,000 pages. When the chip counts 1,001 printed pages, it
    ceases printing and produces a difficult to decode error message. It's
    much the same with laser toner carts and drums. With older iPhone
    batteries, the clock was slowed down to simulate the effects of an
    aging battery.

    Don't buy HP printers. They are in the theft business.

    Brother is a much better deal, both laser and inkjet.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jeff Liebermann@21:1/5 to All on Fri Jan 31 13:07:01 2025
    XPost: sci.electronics.repair, alt.home.repair

    On Fri, 31 Jan 2025 19:32:42 +0000, Cursitor Doom <cd@notformail.com>
    wrote:

    On Thu, 30 Jan 2025 15:09:22 -0800, Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@cruzio.com>
    wrote:

    On Wed, 29 Jan 2025 23:41:08 -0500, micky <NONONOmisc07@fmguy.com>
    wrote:

    In sci.electronics.repair, on Wed, 29 Jan 2025 10:38:40 -0800, Bob F >>><bobnospam@gmail.com> wrote:
    Is there a tiny hole in the case above that switch for usimg as paper >>>>clip to reset the device?

    No, nothing like that. Like most VCRs, DVD players, DVDRs, amplifiers, >>>One big piece of sheet metal covering the top with no holes, no writing. >>>I wonder how it decides when to break?

    Several ways to determine when to self-destruct:

    1. Warranty timer. The timer records how many elapsed days between
    when power was first applied and the current date. When the timer
    shows 110% of the warranty period, it declares a fault or failure. The >>extra 10% is to deal with errors in the timer.

    2. Predicted use. The "chip" in many inkjet printer cartridges is a
    good example. The manufacturer decrees that the inkjet cartridge
    should last 1,000 pages. When the chip counts 1,001 printed pages, it >>ceases printing and produces a difficult to decode error message. It's
    much the same with laser toner carts and drums. With older iPhone >>batteries, the clock was slowed down to simulate the effects of an
    aging battery.

    3. Predictive QA. Estimating the length of time a product and its >>individual components might last is calculated by the QA department.
    If a component survives longer than the approved warranty period, the >>component is subjected to a "cost reduction", which reduces the
    component lifetime, quality and cost. If this ritual is performed
    often enough, all the components in the product will fail almost >>simultaneously.

    The actual length of time or number of operations before
    self-destruction is set by the manufactory marketing department.

    Any companies we might have heard of been found out doing this, Jeff?

    Yes. I've had the displeasure of attending a few design reviews,
    which were mostly cost reduction exercises. Only suggestions which
    lowered costs were considered acceptable. Please don't be overly
    judgmental. Missing a cost target could result in the loss of a bid,
    having a volume buyer switch to another vendor, or a blood red loss
    appearing on the bottom line of the annual report.

    I assume you want me to provide a list of companies who had implement
    cost reductions based on QA statistics. Sorry, but I'm not thrilled
    with idea of disclosing the names my clients and their activities on
    Usenet.

    Most of the company I've worked for have done something similar.
    Substituting inferior parts doesn't require QA statistics. Some
    companies will gladly substitute cheaper parts if that improve the
    bottom line. QA will usually fight such downgrades if only for show.
    They know their jobs might be at risk without the cost cutting.

    After such downgrades were implemented, they sometimes hire me as a
    consultant to "fix the problems but don't change anything". Sometimes
    I give up in disgust or suggest they replace the inferior parts with
    the original parts. What they really want me to do is give up. Then, management declares that because I couldn't fix the problems, the junk
    parts must be the best that can be found for the intended purpose.


    --
    Jeff Liebermann jeffl@cruzio.com
    PO Box 272 http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
    Ben Lomond CA 95005-0272
    Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jeff Liebermann@21:1/5 to All on Fri Jan 31 13:29:33 2025
    XPost: sci.electronics.repair, alt.home.repair

    On Fri, 31 Jan 2025 12:23:06 -0800, john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com>
    wrote:

    On Thu, 30 Jan 2025 15:09:22 -0800, Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@cruzio.com>
    wrote:

    On Wed, 29 Jan 2025 23:41:08 -0500, micky <NONONOmisc07@fmguy.com>
    wrote:

    In sci.electronics.repair, on Wed, 29 Jan 2025 10:38:40 -0800, Bob F >>><bobnospam@gmail.com> wrote:
    Is there a tiny hole in the case above that switch for usimg as paper >>>>clip to reset the device?

    No, nothing like that. Like most VCRs, DVD players, DVDRs, amplifiers, >>>One big piece of sheet metal covering the top with no holes, no writing. >>>I wonder how it decides when to break?

    Several ways to determine when to self-destruct:

    1. Warranty timer. The timer records how many elapsed days between
    when power was first applied and the current date. When the timer
    shows 110% of the warranty period, it declares a fault or failure. The >>extra 10% is to deal with errors in the timer.

    2. Predicted use. The "chip" in many inkjet printer cartridges is a
    good example. The manufacturer decrees that the inkjet cartridge
    should last 1,000 pages. When the chip counts 1,001 printed pages, it >>ceases printing and produces a difficult to decode error message. It's
    much the same with laser toner carts and drums. With older iPhone >>batteries, the clock was slowed down to simulate the effects of an
    aging battery.

    Don't buy HP printers. They are in the theft business.
    Brother is a much better deal, both laser and inkjet.

    I fix a few home and small biz laser printers. The low end inkjets go
    directly to the recycler. My favorite brands are HP and Brother. Home
    users tend to keep their HP laser printers far longer than their
    computers which translates into HP repairs instead of replacements. A
    few business users recycle their HP printers immediately after they
    run out of toner. <https://www.learnbydestroying.com/jeffl/pics/e-waste/printer-eWaste.jpg>
    I usually rebuild Brother laser printers for loaners and resale.

    I like HP because some (not all) of their printers are good quality.
    OEM and aftermarket parts are erratically available. Brother laser
    printers also have their problems. However, I can buy 2.5 Brother
    printers for the price of an equivalent HP printer. Both companies
    have baked in design defects which they seem to be ignoring. Looking
    around my house, I have 2 HP color laserjet printers and 3 Brother laserprinters.



    --
    Jeff Liebermann jeffl@cruzio.com
    PO Box 272 http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
    Ben Lomond CA 95005-0272
    Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From john larkin@21:1/5 to All on Fri Jan 31 16:24:16 2025
    XPost: sci.electronics.repair, alt.home.repair

    On Fri, 31 Jan 2025 13:29:33 -0800, Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@cruzio.com>
    wrote:

    On Fri, 31 Jan 2025 12:23:06 -0800, john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com>
    wrote:

    On Thu, 30 Jan 2025 15:09:22 -0800, Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@cruzio.com> >>wrote:

    On Wed, 29 Jan 2025 23:41:08 -0500, micky <NONONOmisc07@fmguy.com>
    wrote:

    In sci.electronics.repair, on Wed, 29 Jan 2025 10:38:40 -0800, Bob F >>>><bobnospam@gmail.com> wrote:
    Is there a tiny hole in the case above that switch for usimg as paper >>>>>clip to reset the device?

    No, nothing like that. Like most VCRs, DVD players, DVDRs, amplifiers, >>>>One big piece of sheet metal covering the top with no holes, no writing. >>>>I wonder how it decides when to break?

    Several ways to determine when to self-destruct:

    1. Warranty timer. The timer records how many elapsed days between
    when power was first applied and the current date. When the timer
    shows 110% of the warranty period, it declares a fault or failure. The >>>extra 10% is to deal with errors in the timer.

    2. Predicted use. The "chip" in many inkjet printer cartridges is a >>>good example. The manufacturer decrees that the inkjet cartridge
    should last 1,000 pages. When the chip counts 1,001 printed pages, it >>>ceases printing and produces a difficult to decode error message. It's >>>much the same with laser toner carts and drums. With older iPhone >>>batteries, the clock was slowed down to simulate the effects of an
    aging battery.

    Don't buy HP printers. They are in the theft business.
    Brother is a much better deal, both laser and inkjet.

    I fix a few home and small biz laser printers. The low end inkjets go >directly to the recycler. My favorite brands are HP and Brother. Home
    users tend to keep their HP laser printers far longer than their
    computers which translates into HP repairs instead of replacements. A
    few business users recycle their HP printers immediately after they
    run out of toner. ><https://www.learnbydestroying.com/jeffl/pics/e-waste/printer-eWaste.jpg>
    I usually rebuild Brother laser printers for loaners and resale.

    I like HP because some (not all) of their printers are good quality.
    OEM and aftermarket parts are erratically available. Brother laser >printers also have their problems. However, I can buy 2.5 Brother
    printers for the price of an equivalent HP printer. Both companies
    have baked in design defects which they seem to be ignoring. Looking
    around my house, I have 2 HP color laserjet printers and 3 Brother >laserprinters.

    HP sells printers cheap with half-filled cartriges, and charges as
    much as a new printer for a new set, which don't last long. If their
    printers came with full cartriges, people would throw away the printer
    when it ran out of toner.

    Our Brother B-size inkjet printer/copier/scanner is great, and ink
    refills are cheap. We do B-size schematics. They have a giant black
    cartrige too; we mostly use black.

    What are the Brother design defects?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Cursitor Doom@21:1/5 to All on Sat Feb 1 00:28:24 2025
    XPost: sci.electronics.repair, alt.home.repair

    On Fri, 31 Jan 2025 12:23:06 -0800, john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com>
    wrote:

    On Thu, 30 Jan 2025 15:09:22 -0800, Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@cruzio.com>
    wrote:

    On Wed, 29 Jan 2025 23:41:08 -0500, micky <NONONOmisc07@fmguy.com>
    wrote:

    In sci.electronics.repair, on Wed, 29 Jan 2025 10:38:40 -0800, Bob F >>><bobnospam@gmail.com> wrote:
    Is there a tiny hole in the case above that switch for usimg as paper >>>>clip to reset the device?

    No, nothing like that. Like most VCRs, DVD players, DVDRs, amplifiers, >>>One big piece of sheet metal covering the top with no holes, no writing. >>>I wonder how it decides when to break?

    Several ways to determine when to self-destruct:

    1. Warranty timer. The timer records how many elapsed days between
    when power was first applied and the current date. When the timer
    shows 110% of the warranty period, it declares a fault or failure. The >>extra 10% is to deal with errors in the timer.

    2. Predicted use. The "chip" in many inkjet printer cartridges is a
    good example. The manufacturer decrees that the inkjet cartridge
    should last 1,000 pages. When the chip counts 1,001 printed pages, it >>ceases printing and produces a difficult to decode error message. It's
    much the same with laser toner carts and drums. With older iPhone >>batteries, the clock was slowed down to simulate the effects of an
    aging battery.

    Don't buy HP printers. They are in the theft business.

    Brother is a much better deal, both laser and inkjet.


    Wasn't it HP that was spying on customers by some ingenious yellow
    pixel scheme? Then made some excuse about catching forgers or some
    such claim.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From micky@21:1/5 to larkin on Fri Jan 31 23:58:07 2025
    XPost: sci.electronics.repair, alt.home.repair

    In sci.electronics.repair, on Fri, 31 Jan 2025 16:24:16 -0800, john
    larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> wrote:



    HP sells printers cheap with half-filled cartriges, and charges as
    much as a new printer for a new set, which don't last long. If their
    printers came with full cartriges, people would throw away the printer
    when it ran out of toner.

    Our Brother B-size inkjet printer/copier/scanner is great, and ink
    refills are cheap. We do B-size schematics. They have a giant black
    cartrige too; we mostly use black.

    What does B-size mean? Is it bigger than 8 1/2 x 14?

    What are the Brother design defects?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From micky@21:1/5 to All on Sat Feb 1 00:27:29 2025
    XPost: sci.electronics.repair, alt.home.repair

    In sci.electronics.repair, on Sun, 26 Jan 2025 12:42:01 -0500, micky <NONONOmisc07@fmguy.com> wrote:

    I told about having the wires from a trial of a spinal cord stimulator
    removed, followed by the worst pain I'd ever had, tapering off over an
    hour, paralysis from the waist down for 3 hours, and them urinary
    incontinence which when I posted had lasted for weeks and I feared would
    last the rest of my life.

    Glad to you you back. Hope you have a good resolution to your problem.

    Thank you.

    Thank you again, and a follow-up.

    The pain doctor I don't like or trust anymore, because of his lack of
    sympathy and the ongoing feeling that he made some error that caused all
    this. He may be worried that saying something nice would make him
    liable, but Maryland like most states has an "apology law" that prevents
    that. Apologies aren't even admissible in court (unless you say, "I'm
    sorry I gave you 3 times the normal dose.")

    The spine surgeon told me the hematoma on my spinal cord would take 6 to
    8 weeks to be absorbed. It was iirc 7 inches long and about a half inch
    wide at the widest and went through 5 vertebrae, t-7 to t-11.

    The urologist told me that normally urinary incontinence caused by a
    hematoma on the spinal cord resolves itself positively, but it can take
    3 months.

    Last Friday was 6 weeks and 2 days and the MRI that day showed the
    hematoma was completely gone. Five days later, two days ago, exactly 7
    weeks, Wednesday at noon was the start of a two and a half day period up
    to right now where I seem to be normal again. So if nothing goes wrong,
    I'm back to normal. Hooray!!! Back still hurts like before but no more
    diapers.

    Of course now, if I have to pee in the middle of the night, I'll have to
    wake up and get up to do it, instead of just sleeping through it.

    Spine surgeon says he's had 1000 patients over the last 10 years who had
    spinal cord stimulators tested or both tested and then installed under
    the skin. 70% benefit from the trial, unlike me, and go ahead with the
    full install. And he's never had a patient with the bad effects I had,

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ed P@21:1/5 to micky on Sat Feb 1 00:27:38 2025
    XPost: sci.electronics.repair, alt.home.repair

    On 1/31/2025 11:58 PM, micky wrote:
    In sci.electronics.repair, on Fri, 31 Jan 2025 16:24:16 -0800, john
    larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> wrote:



    HP sells printers cheap with half-filled cartriges, and charges as
    much as a new printer for a new set, which don't last long. If their
    printers came with full cartriges, people would throw away the printer
    when it ran out of toner.

    Our Brother B-size inkjet printer/copier/scanner is great, and ink
    refills are cheap. We do B-size schematics. They have a giant black
    cartrige too; we mostly use black.

    What does B-size mean? Is it bigger than 8 1/2 x 14?

    What are the Brother design defects?


    11 x 17 Often used fro engineering drawings

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jeff Liebermann@21:1/5 to All on Fri Jan 31 21:19:24 2025
    XPost: sci.electronics.repair, alt.home.repair

    On Sat, 01 Feb 2025 00:28:24 +0000, Cursitor Doom <cd@notformail.com>
    wrote:

    On Fri, 31 Jan 2025 12:23:06 -0800, john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com>
    wrote:

    On Thu, 30 Jan 2025 15:09:22 -0800, Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@cruzio.com> >>wrote:

    On Wed, 29 Jan 2025 23:41:08 -0500, micky <NONONOmisc07@fmguy.com>
    wrote:

    In sci.electronics.repair, on Wed, 29 Jan 2025 10:38:40 -0800, Bob F >>>><bobnospam@gmail.com> wrote:
    Is there a tiny hole in the case above that switch for usimg as paper >>>>>clip to reset the device?

    No, nothing like that. Like most VCRs, DVD players, DVDRs, amplifiers, >>>>One big piece of sheet metal covering the top with no holes, no writing. >>>>I wonder how it decides when to break?

    Several ways to determine when to self-destruct:

    1. Warranty timer. The timer records how many elapsed days between
    when power was first applied and the current date. When the timer
    shows 110% of the warranty period, it declares a fault or failure. The >>>extra 10% is to deal with errors in the timer.

    2. Predicted use. The "chip" in many inkjet printer cartridges is a >>>good example. The manufacturer decrees that the inkjet cartridge
    should last 1,000 pages. When the chip counts 1,001 printed pages, it >>>ceases printing and produces a difficult to decode error message. It's >>>much the same with laser toner carts and drums. With older iPhone >>>batteries, the clock was slowed down to simulate the effects of an
    aging battery.

    Don't buy HP printers. They are in the theft business.

    Brother is a much better deal, both laser and inkjet.


    Wasn't it HP that was spying on customers by some ingenious yellow
    pixel scheme? Then made some excuse about catching forgers or some
    such claim.

    The yellow dots are for identifying the printer for tracking ransom
    notes, forgeries, fake documents, currency, etc. The yellow dots are
    why your printer runs out of yellow toner or ink before the other
    toner colors. See:
    <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Printer_tracking_dots> <https://www.instructables.com/Yellow-Dots-of-Mystery-Is-Your-Printer-Spying-on-/>

    Methinks this is where the "spying" story may have originated:
    "Tracking codes in photocopiers and colour laser printers"
    (Aug 11, 2007) <https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/E-6-2007-5724_EN.html>

    If you want to see the yellow dots, you'll need a UV LED flashlight. I
    had the not-so-bright idea of pouring some black toner into an old
    yellow toner cartridge. The dots were easily visible with a
    magnifying glass. However, it took me about an hour to clean up the
    transfer belt mechanism so that yellow would print normally. Not
    recommended.





    --
    Jeff Liebermann jeffl@cruzio.com
    PO Box 272 http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
    Ben Lomond CA 95005-0272
    Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jeff Liebermann@21:1/5 to All on Fri Jan 31 22:02:41 2025
    XPost: sci.electronics.repair, alt.home.repair

    On Fri, 31 Jan 2025 16:24:16 -0800, john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com>
    wrote:

    What are the Brother design defects?

    Brother MFC-L2740DW printer: <https://www.google.com/search?q=brother%20mfc%20L2740dw&udm=2>
    The problem appears on many similar Brother laser printers.

    If the owner pulls out the paper tray while it's printing, the printer
    does not stop printing. Instead, it cracks the tiny feed gear. I
    have some photos I took of the damage and subsequent repair, but I
    can't find them right now.

    In the front center of the paper tray, there is a translucent roller
    that is part of the paper feed mechanism. Static electricity causes
    this roller to be packed with paper dust and eventually stop turning,
    causing a paper jam or other paper feed failure. The paper dust hides
    UNDER the translucent roller and is easily cleaned out if you can
    figure out how it's done. I can take a few photos showing how if you
    want them.

    Near the translucent roller in the paper tray is a friction pap. The
    pad and the feed roller above its position in the paper tray tend to
    develop a smooth polish. The loss of friction causes feed failures.
    Brother's idea of repair parts are toner carts and drums: <https://www.brother-usa.com/supplies-and-accessories-search-result#q=MFC-L2740dw>
    A trick the works on some printers is to remove the rubber roller or
    pad, flip it over, and reinstall it. Fortunately, 3rd party vendors
    carry suck parts.

    The paper stop near the back of the paper tray is fragile. Push too
    hard inserting a stack of paper and it will break. This should work
    as a replacement: <https://www.parts-distribution.com/collections/brother/products/new-oem-brother-250-page-rear-paper-guide-for-mfcl2700dw-mfc-l2700dw>

    The main PCB in the printer uses a super capacitor instead of the
    usual lithium coin cell to provide power to the circuitry that stores
    the printer settings. When it fails, printer won't turn on. Replacing
    the super capacitor involves disassembly and soldering. YouTube video
    on how to replace the super cap:
    <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OgkHv1c01tQ> <https://www.ifixit.com/Guide/Brother+MFC-J4420DW+Capacitor+Replacement/74271> The caps are 5.5VDC 0.22Farads.
    <https://www.google.com/search?q=KR-5r5V224-R>

    That should be enough for now...


    --
    Jeff Liebermann jeffl@cruzio.com
    PO Box 272 http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
    Ben Lomond CA 95005-0272
    Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Cursitor Doom@21:1/5 to All on Sat Feb 1 13:32:51 2025
    XPost: sci.electronics.repair, alt.home.repair

    On Fri, 31 Jan 2025 21:19:24 -0800, Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@cruzio.com>
    wrote:

    On Sat, 01 Feb 2025 00:28:24 +0000, Cursitor Doom <cd@notformail.com>
    wrote:

    On Fri, 31 Jan 2025 12:23:06 -0800, john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> >>wrote:

    On Thu, 30 Jan 2025 15:09:22 -0800, Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@cruzio.com> >>>wrote:

    On Wed, 29 Jan 2025 23:41:08 -0500, micky <NONONOmisc07@fmguy.com> >>>>wrote:

    In sci.electronics.repair, on Wed, 29 Jan 2025 10:38:40 -0800, Bob F >>>>><bobnospam@gmail.com> wrote:
    Is there a tiny hole in the case above that switch for usimg as paper >>>>>>clip to reset the device?

    No, nothing like that. Like most VCRs, DVD players, DVDRs, amplifiers, >>>>>One big piece of sheet metal covering the top with no holes, no writing. >>>>>I wonder how it decides when to break?

    Several ways to determine when to self-destruct:

    1. Warranty timer. The timer records how many elapsed days between >>>>when power was first applied and the current date. When the timer >>>>shows 110% of the warranty period, it declares a fault or failure. The >>>>extra 10% is to deal with errors in the timer.

    2. Predicted use. The "chip" in many inkjet printer cartridges is a >>>>good example. The manufacturer decrees that the inkjet cartridge >>>>should last 1,000 pages. When the chip counts 1,001 printed pages, it >>>>ceases printing and produces a difficult to decode error message. It's >>>>much the same with laser toner carts and drums. With older iPhone >>>>batteries, the clock was slowed down to simulate the effects of an >>>>aging battery.

    Don't buy HP printers. They are in the theft business.

    Brother is a much better deal, both laser and inkjet.


    Wasn't it HP that was spying on customers by some ingenious yellow
    pixel scheme? Then made some excuse about catching forgers or some
    such claim.

    The yellow dots are for identifying the printer for tracking ransom
    notes, forgeries, fake documents, currency, etc. The yellow dots are
    why your printer runs out of yellow toner or ink before the other
    toner colors. See:
    <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Printer_tracking_dots> ><https://www.instructables.com/Yellow-Dots-of-Mystery-Is-Your-Printer-Spying-on-/>

    Methinks this is where the "spying" story may have originated:
    "Tracking codes in photocopiers and colour laser printers"
    (Aug 11, 2007) ><https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/E-6-2007-5724_EN.html>

    If you want to see the yellow dots, you'll need a UV LED flashlight. I
    had the not-so-bright idea of pouring some black toner into an old
    yellow toner cartridge. The dots were easily visible with a
    magnifying glass. However, it took me about an hour to clean up the
    transfer belt mechanism so that yellow would print normally. Not >recommended.

    Thanks, Jeff. You're a mine of useful information as ever.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Joe Gwinn@21:1/5 to All on Sat Feb 1 11:07:18 2025
    Jeff,

    Very interesting in general, and I just bought a Brother MFC-L8905CDW.
    Have you encountered any of those yet?

    What the above replaced was an ancient Brother MFC-9840CDW, and I did
    have and repair many problems, and got 15 years out of it.

    Thanks,

    Joe


    On Fri, 31 Jan 2025 22:02:41 -0800, Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@cruzio.com>
    wrote:

    On Fri, 31 Jan 2025 16:24:16 -0800, john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com>
    wrote:

    What are the Brother design defects?

    Brother MFC-L2740DW printer: ><https://www.google.com/search?q=brother%20mfc%20L2740dw&udm=2>
    The problem appears on many similar Brother laser printers.

    If the owner pulls out the paper tray while it's printing, the printer
    does not stop printing. Instead, it cracks the tiny feed gear. I
    have some photos I took of the damage and subsequent repair, but I
    can't find them right now.

    In the front center of the paper tray, there is a translucent roller
    that is part of the paper feed mechanism. Static electricity causes
    this roller to be packed with paper dust and eventually stop turning,
    causing a paper jam or other paper feed failure. The paper dust hides
    UNDER the translucent roller and is easily cleaned out if you can
    figure out how it's done. I can take a few photos showing how if you
    want them.

    Near the translucent roller in the paper tray is a friction pap. The
    pad and the feed roller above its position in the paper tray tend to
    develop a smooth polish. The loss of friction causes feed failures. >Brother's idea of repair parts are toner carts and drums: ><https://www.brother-usa.com/supplies-and-accessories-search-result#q=MFC-L2740dw>
    A trick the works on some printers is to remove the rubber roller or
    pad, flip it over, and reinstall it. Fortunately, 3rd party vendors
    carry suck parts.

    The paper stop near the back of the paper tray is fragile. Push too
    hard inserting a stack of paper and it will break. This should work
    as a replacement: ><https://www.parts-distribution.com/collections/brother/products/new-oem-brother-250-page-rear-paper-guide-for-mfcl2700dw-mfc-l2700dw>

    The main PCB in the printer uses a super capacitor instead of the
    usual lithium coin cell to provide power to the circuitry that stores
    the printer settings. When it fails, printer won't turn on. Replacing
    the super capacitor involves disassembly and soldering. YouTube video
    on how to replace the super cap: ><https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OgkHv1c01tQ> ><https://www.ifixit.com/Guide/Brother+MFC-J4420DW+Capacitor+Replacement/74271> >The caps are 5.5VDC 0.22Farads. ><https://www.google.com/search?q=KR-5r5V224-R>

    That should be enough for now...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From micky@21:1/5 to NONONOmisc07@fmguy.com on Sat Feb 1 11:29:11 2025
    XPost: sci.electronics.repair, alt.home.repair

    In sci.electronics.repair, on Sun, 26 Jan 2025 12:02:09 -0500, micky <NONONOmisc07@fmguy.com> wrote:

    With email copy to Ed. Remove NONONO to email.

    The "Ed" referred to here wrote me in reply,
    "Yeah, depending on which of a few thousand engineering shops designed
    the DVDR, there could be some Reset Button hidden in the middle of
    nowhere that brings it back to life

    by possibly deleting a bloated task-log/calendar that was not given
    enough memory/disc-space for the unforeseen service life of ~15 years."

    I don't think that would apply to my DVDR, since afaik there is no
    reason for it to keep a log. What do you all think?

    But at least in some cases, the switch would be curing a real problem.
    Of course they could arrange for the display, instead of saying play or
    rewiund to see "E3, see manual" and if there is no room for that, or
    they forgot to code it, they could just put it in the printed owners
    manual. Still, it molifies me a tiny bit that there could be a real
    problem that the switch cures.

    I posted in another thread about my philips DVDR3575H dvdr with
    harddrive that stopped working 2 or 3 months ago. (I've had medical
    problems since Dec 11, so I've not gotten much done. They are scheduled
    to end or be permanent by March 11. I'm optimistic.)

    But I did buy another identical dvdr from ebay for 180 dollars (they had
    much cheaper, but the first one lasted me 15 years, and even though the
    one I just bought is also already 15 years old, I still think it will
    last 15 years. See, I'm optimistic.) And he was the only one who
    showed a tv with a picture on it in his photos.

    I put it in and it worked fine for 2 of the 3 tv's I'm using now, but
    one 14" crt tv has much more static when text or commercials come on the >screen than it did before. That is another topic. Anyone have any
    ideas? I'll post details if you do.

    The topic here is what happened when I took apart the broken one. Since
    it was totally dead, I expected to find a problem with the power supply.
    I didnt' see anything burned out, and before I got out my meter, I
    looked around and in the middle of another board, iirc the tuner board,
    I found a little switch that looks like the middle ones in the back row
    here: >https://www.google.com/imgres?q=mini%20push%20button%20switch&imgurl=https%3A%2F%2Fi.ebayimg.com%2F00%2Fs%2FMTYwMFgxNjAw%2Fz%2F~CQAAOSwg-NiIKR4%2F%24_57.JPG%3Fset_id%3D8800005007&imgrefurl=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ebay.com%2Fitm%2F402506084854&docid=
    lTwHaPMd2PG4uM&tbnid=IkOz4CNcM5iAZM&vet=12ahUKEwiUzL-g8JKLAxUckokEHQRPGacQM3oECGUQAA..i&w=1600&h=1600&hcb=2&ved=2ahUKEwiUzL-g8JKLAxUckokEHQRPGacQM3oECGUQAA
    The little black sticks sticking up in the middle are made of plastic or >rubber, so like Dorothy in the Wizard of Oz or Alice in Wonderland, I
    pushed it down. And the DVDR started working again!!!

    How come they don't mention this in the owners manual for my model, and
    I found a service manual for a similar DVDR that doesn't say a word
    about it either. The switch is labeled Reset
    Sw.50
    I can post the urls for the manuals if you want.

    I haven't connected the output yet because I'd have to connect a RF >modulator, but it shows On, Play, Rewind, none of which it did before.
    I'm 95% convinced it works as good as before. Unless it fails again?
    Likely? Why do they have this button if they're going to keep it
    secret?

    Have you ever heard of a button like this before?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jeff Liebermann@21:1/5 to All on Sat Feb 1 09:57:51 2025
    On Sat, 01 Feb 2025 11:07:18 -0500, Joe Gwinn <joegwinn@comcast.net>
    wrote:

    Very interesting in general, and I just bought a Brother MFC-L8905CDW.
    Have you encountered any of those yet?

    What the above replaced was an ancient Brother MFC-9840CDW, and I did
    have and repair many problems, and got 15 years out of it.

    I retired from the daily grind just after the CZU fire and Covid. I
    currently don't see many repairs on larger and heavier printers
    because I would need to carry the printers up and down 50 stairs to
    work on them. I also don't have the necessary bench space available.
    My current customers are mostly home users who normally don't need or
    purchase big and heavy business class printers.

    I haven't worked on any MFC-L8905CDW printers but have recently
    cleaned a similar model after an aftermarket toner cartridge dumped
    toner everywhere. I didn't see anything unusual when I tested it. <https://www.brother-usa.com/products/mfcl8905cdw>

    The old MFC-9840CDW (discontinued) was not a good printer. <https://www.google.com/search?q=MFC-9840CDW&udm=2>
    Two of my customer bought them many years ago. As I vaguely recall,
    the colors did not print true, the color self-calibration didn't quite
    work, and I had to clean toner from the belt with almost every
    cartridge change. I don't recall any component failures or
    replacement. The rubber parts, which are usually the first to die,
    held up well, mostly because the printer was lightly used.

    Try:
    <https://www.ifixit.com/Answers/Device/Brother_Printer> <https://www.printerforums.net/forums/brother.19/>

    --
    Jeff Liebermann jeffl@cruzio.com
    PO Box 272 http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
    Ben Lomond CA 95005-0272
    Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Phil Hobbs@21:1/5 to Jeff Liebermann on Sat Feb 1 18:24:20 2025
    Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@cruzio.com> wrote:
    On Sat, 01 Feb 2025 11:07:18 -0500, Joe Gwinn <joegwinn@comcast.net>
    wrote:

    Very interesting in general, and I just bought a Brother MFC-L8905CDW.
    Have you encountered any of those yet?

    What the above replaced was an ancient Brother MFC-9840CDW, and I did
    have and repair many problems, and got 15 years out of it.

    I retired from the daily grind just after the CZU fire and Covid. I currently don't see many repairs on larger and heavier printers
    because I would need to carry the printers up and down 50 stairs to
    work on them. I also don't have the necessary bench space available.
    My current customers are mostly home users who normally don't need or purchase big and heavy business class printers.

    I haven't worked on any MFC-L8905CDW printers but have recently
    cleaned a similar model after an aftermarket toner cartridge dumped
    toner everywhere. I didn't see anything unusual when I tested it. <https://www.brother-usa.com/products/mfcl8905cdw>

    The old MFC-9840CDW (discontinued) was not a good printer. <https://www.google.com/search?q=MFC-9840CDW&udm=2>
    Two of my customer bought them many years ago. As I vaguely recall,
    the colors did not print true, the color self-calibration didn't quite
    work, and I had to clean toner from the belt with almost every
    cartridge change. I don't recall any component failures or
    replacement. The rubber parts, which are usually the first to die,
    held up well, mostly because the printer was lightly used.

    Try:
    <https://www.ifixit.com/Answers/Device/Brother_Printer> <https://www.printerforums.net/forums/brother.19/>


    I have a couple of Brother MFC-6490CW B-size all-in-ones that I just love. Excellent print quality with cheap, chip-free ink cartridges, good
    scanning, no worries.

    Good Medicine!

    Cheers

    Phil Hobbs

    --
    Dr Philip C D Hobbs Principal Consultant ElectroOptical Innovations LLC / Hobbs ElectroOptics Optics, Electro-optics, Photonics, Analog Electronics

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Carlos E.R.@21:1/5 to Jeff Liebermann on Sat Feb 1 21:06:45 2025
    XPost: sci.electronics.repair, alt.home.repair

    On 2025-02-01 06:19, Jeff Liebermann wrote:
    On Sat, 01 Feb 2025 00:28:24 +0000, Cursitor Doom <cd@notformail.com>
    wrote:


    Wasn't it HP that was spying on customers by some ingenious yellow
    pixel scheme? Then made some excuse about catching forgers or some
    such claim.

    The yellow dots are for identifying the printer for tracking ransom
    notes, forgeries, fake documents, currency, etc. The yellow dots are
    why your printer runs out of yellow toner or ink before the other
    toner colors. See:

    Are they still doing this? :-o

    <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Printer_tracking_dots> <https://www.instructables.com/Yellow-Dots-of-Mystery-Is-Your-Printer-Spying-on-/>

    Methinks this is where the "spying" story may have originated:
    "Tracking codes in photocopiers and colour laser printers"
    (Aug 11, 2007) <https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/E-6-2007-5724_EN.html>

    If you want to see the yellow dots, you'll need a UV LED flashlight. I
    had the not-so-bright idea of pouring some black toner into an old
    yellow toner cartridge. The dots were easily visible with a
    magnifying glass. However, it took me about an hour to clean up the
    transfer belt mechanism so that yellow would print normally. Not recommended.

    I carefully examined printouts from my printer long ago, did not find
    anything.
    --
    Cheers, Carlos.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jeff Liebermann@21:1/5 to pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical. on Sat Feb 1 13:48:04 2025
    On Sat, 1 Feb 2025 18:24:20 -0000 (UTC), Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> wrote:
    (chomp)
    I have a couple of Brother MFC-6490CW B-size all-in-ones that I just love. >Excellent print quality with cheap, chip-free ink cartridges, good
    scanning, no worries.

    <https://www.brother-usa.com/products/mfc6490cw> <https://www.google.com/search?q=mfc6490cw&udm=2>
    Yes, but that is a color inkjet and not a color laser printer.
    However, it's much cheaper than an equivalent B-size color laser
    printer.

    Also, not having to deal with refill protection chips on the toner or
    ink carts is a big savings. The Brother MFC-L2740DW laser printer I
    previously mentioned is the last of the Brother home or small office
    printers which do not require a toner cartridge with a chip. <https://www.brother-usa.com/-/media/brother/product-catalog-media/documents/2020/04/28/18/35/mfc-l2740dw_brochure_919.pdf>
    <https://www.google.com/search?q=MFC-L2740DW&udm=2>
    I refurbished 9 used printers, kept 2 for myself, and sold the
    remaining printers to customers. The printer was introduced in
    2014(?). I think 5 of them have been cleaned, had the super cap
    replaced and some rubber parts replaced. I promised the other owners
    that I would replace the battery for free, but would charge for the
    rubber parts and cleaning. So far, all the remaining batteries are
    still working.

    This photo is from 2019 at the local recycler: <https://www.learnbydestroying.com/jeffl/pics/e-waste/printer-eWaste.jpg> That's about 1 weeks collection of just printers. Notice that the
    pile is mostly big, heavy, office laser printers. As far as I could
    tell, they were almost new. All the printers went to various
    refurbishers to be resold on eBay or Amazon.

    Good Medicine!

    Thanks. What does "good medicine" mean?

    Cheers
    Phil Hobbs
    --
    Jeff Liebermann jeffl@cruzio.com
    PO Box 272 http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
    Ben Lomond CA 95005-0272
    Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jeff Liebermann@21:1/5 to robin_listas@es.invalid on Sat Feb 1 14:02:57 2025
    XPost: sci.electronics.repair, alt.home.repair

    On Sat, 1 Feb 2025 21:06:45 +0100, "Carlos E.R."
    <robin_listas@es.invalid> wrote:

    On 2025-02-01 06:19, Jeff Liebermann wrote:
    On Sat, 01 Feb 2025 00:28:24 +0000, Cursitor Doom <cd@notformail.com>
    wrote:


    Wasn't it HP that was spying on customers by some ingenious yellow
    pixel scheme? Then made some excuse about catching forgers or some
    such claim.

    The yellow dots are for identifying the printer for tracking ransom
    notes, forgeries, fake documents, currency, etc. The yellow dots are
    why your printer runs out of yellow toner or ink before the other
    toner colors. See:

    Are they still doing this? :-o

    As far as I know, and can determine from skimming various related web
    sites, they're all doing it and have not added any way to turn it off.

    <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Printer_tracking_dots>
    <https://www.instructables.com/Yellow-Dots-of-Mystery-Is-Your-Printer-Spying-on-/>

    Methinks this is where the "spying" story may have originated:
    "Tracking codes in photocopiers and colour laser printers"
    (Aug 11, 2007)
    <https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/E-6-2007-5724_EN.html>

    If you want to see the yellow dots, you'll need a UV LED flashlight. I
    had the not-so-bright idea of pouring some black toner into an old
    yellow toner cartridge. The dots were easily visible with a
    magnifying glass. However, it took me about an hour to clean up the
    transfer belt mechanism so that yellow would print normally. Not
    recommended.

    I carefully examined printouts from my printer long ago, did not find >anything.

    I examined some prints last night and also couldn't find any yellow
    dots. Brain function returned this morning when I realized that I was
    looking at B&W prints from my monochrome laser printer. Yellow dots
    require yellow toner. I'll try again, this time using my HP Color
    Laser Jet Pro MFP M477fnw printer.

    --
    Jeff Liebermann jeffl@cruzio.com
    PO Box 272 http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
    Ben Lomond CA 95005-0272
    Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From micky@21:1/5 to Liebermann on Sat Feb 1 17:34:01 2025
    XPost: sci.electronics.repair, alt.home.repair

    In sci.electronics.repair, on Sat, 01 Feb 2025 14:02:57 -0800, Jeff
    Liebermann <jeffl@cruzio.com> wrote:


    I examined some prints last night and also couldn't find any yellow
    dots. Brain function returned this morning when I realized that I was >looking at B&W prints from my monochrome laser printer.

    I have days like that too. As long as it's not weeks, I'm not too
    worried.


    Yellow dots
    require yellow toner. I'll try again, this time using my HP Color
    Laser Jet Pro MFP M477fnw printer.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Joe Gwinn@21:1/5 to All on Sat Feb 1 18:39:11 2025
    On Sat, 01 Feb 2025 09:57:51 -0800, Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@cruzio.com>
    wrote:

    On Sat, 01 Feb 2025 11:07:18 -0500, Joe Gwinn <joegwinn@comcast.net>
    wrote:

    Very interesting in general, and I just bought a Brother MFC-L8905CDW.
    Have you encountered any of those yet?

    What the above replaced was an ancient Brother MFC-9840CDW, and I did
    have and repair many problems, and got 15 years out of it.

    I retired from the daily grind just after the CZU fire and Covid. I >currently don't see many repairs on larger and heavier printers
    because I would need to carry the printers up and down 50 stairs to
    work on them. I also don't have the necessary bench space available.
    My current customers are mostly home users who normally don't need or >purchase big and heavy business class printers.

    I tend to buy the industrial stuff, but at their lower end, because
    the extra expense is worth it for better quality.

    Sometimes the industrial stuff is cheaper as well. Like for instance
    metro wire shelves.

    And one of my selection criteria was weight, with heavier preferred
    (meaning more metal and less plastic).


    I haven't worked on any MFC-L8905CDW printers but have recently
    cleaned a similar model after an aftermarket toner cartridge dumped
    toner everywhere. I didn't see anything unusual when I tested it. ><https://www.brother-usa.com/products/mfcl8905cdw>

    The old MFC-9840CDW (discontinued) was not a good printer. ><https://www.google.com/search?q=MFC-9840CDW&udm=2>
    Two of my customers bought them many years ago. As I vaguely recall,
    the colors did not print true, the color self-calibration didn't quite
    work, and I had to clean toner from the belt with almost every
    cartridge change.

    The color was never all that good to be sure, but it was good enough
    for me. Nor did I clean the belt all that often.


    I don't recall any component failures or
    replacement. The rubber parts, which are usually the first to die,
    held up well, mostly because the printer was lightly used.

    It worked well for many years, but it developed problems as it became
    elderly. In all cases, the underlying problem was that some rubber or
    plastic component had aged and become glazed. Disassembly and
    cleaning with a fiberglass brush followed by ethanol wiping helped a
    lot. The famed "Stable 32" error was fixed by a carefully placed
    piece of mylar tape that prevented sticking.

    But finally it all had worn out too much, and the common wear-out
    parts could no longer be purchased anywhere. And while toner was
    still available, the large-capacity cartridges were not, which I took
    as an omen.

    And after 15 years, it owed me nothing, and many things were greatly
    improved over those years. The new printer is twice as fast as the
    old printer, and the color is far better. And does not misfeed when
    humidity is low.


    Try:
    <https://www.ifixit.com/Answers/Device/Brother_Printer> ><https://www.printerforums.net/forums/brother.19/>

    Will do, thanks

    Joe Gwinn

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jeff Liebermann@21:1/5 to All on Sat Feb 1 15:29:51 2025
    XPost: sci.electronics.repair, alt.home.repair

    On Sat, 01 Feb 2025 14:02:57 -0800, Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@cruzio.com>
    wrote:

    On Sat, 1 Feb 2025 21:06:45 +0100, "Carlos E.R."
    <robin_listas@es.invalid> wrote:

    On 2025-02-01 06:19, Jeff Liebermann wrote:
    On Sat, 01 Feb 2025 00:28:24 +0000, Cursitor Doom <cd@notformail.com>
    wrote:


    Wasn't it HP that was spying on customers by some ingenious yellow
    pixel scheme? Then made some excuse about catching forgers or some
    such claim.

    The yellow dots are for identifying the printer for tracking ransom
    notes, forgeries, fake documents, currency, etc. The yellow dots are
    why your printer runs out of yellow toner or ink before the other
    toner colors. See:

    Are they still doing this? :-o

    As far as I know, and can determine from skimming various related web
    sites, they're all doing it and have not added any way to turn it off.

    <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Printer_tracking_dots>
    <https://www.instructables.com/Yellow-Dots-of-Mystery-Is-Your-Printer-Spying-on-/>

    Methinks this is where the "spying" story may have originated:
    "Tracking codes in photocopiers and colour laser printers"
    (Aug 11, 2007)
    <https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/E-6-2007-5724_EN.html>

    If you want to see the yellow dots, you'll need a UV LED flashlight. I
    had the not-so-bright idea of pouring some black toner into an old
    yellow toner cartridge. The dots were easily visible with a
    magnifying glass. However, it took me about an hour to clean up the
    transfer belt mechanism so that yellow would print normally. Not
    recommended.

    I carefully examined printouts from my printer long ago, did not find >>anything.

    I examined some prints last night and also couldn't find any yellow
    dots. Brain function returned this morning when I realized that I was >looking at B&W prints from my monochrome laser printer. Yellow dots
    require yellow toner. I'll try again, this time using my HP Color
    Laser Jet Pro MFP M477fnw printer.

    I found the yellow dots, but it wasn't easy. As usual, I did
    everything wrong the first time I tried it.

    1. Use a magnifier. I found that a folding jewelers 30x loupe, with
    a built in white LED, worked well. This what I used: <https://www.ebay.com/itm/116331398465>
    Both loupes were low quality, but the price was right. The UV light
    didn't do anything useful. I could try using one of my microscopes,
    but the kitchen table is currently occupied.

    2. Don't use paper with a rough or textured (linen, felt, laid, etc)
    surface. Try to find paper with a smooth surface. If it looks like
    the surface of the moon with a magnifier, find some other paper.

    3. Some articles suggest using UV illumination. I have a wide
    variety of UV lights in both LED and fluorescent in various
    wavelengths. However, yellow toner is not phosphorescent, so it must
    be the phosphors they add to paper to make them appear "bright". Sure
    enough, UV illumination worked best with 96 bright paper. I didn't
    have any 100 bright. However, UV illumination didn't improve
    visibility much.

    4. The tiny dots seem unevenly spread over the surface of the paper.
    You'll need to move the magnifying glass around the page to find the
    yellow dots. At 30x the depth of field is small. That means put the
    printed page on something flat.

    5. When I first started looking for the dots, I almost instantly saw
    them. About 1 minute later, the dots disappeared. What happened is
    that I had cataract surgery about 1 year ago. The problem was that it
    wasn't totally successful. As soon as I was able to rest my eyes a
    little, the dots re-appeared.

    6. I guessed that the designers did not include a feature where the
    dots moved around the page after each printed page. Therefore,
    over-printing the same page multiple times should improve visibility. Unfortunately, my laser printer has a registration problem causing the overprinted dots and text on the page to move. However, I have more
    dots to view. I found more barely visible yellow dots, but also a few
    very bright yellow dots.

    It's my understanding that the yellow dots also appear when "printing"
    to a file. I suspect that printing on dark paper will improve the
    contrast and make the yellow dots more visible. I would guess(tm)
    that a yellow filter might also help improve contrast. I haven't
    tried any of these (yet).

    Good luck.



    --
    Jeff Liebermann jeffl@cruzio.com
    PO Box 272 http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
    Ben Lomond CA 95005-0272
    Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From john larkin@21:1/5 to All on Sat Feb 1 15:45:36 2025
    XPost: sci.electronics.repair, alt.home.repair

    On Sat, 01 Feb 2025 15:29:51 -0800, Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@cruzio.com>
    wrote:

    On Sat, 01 Feb 2025 14:02:57 -0800, Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@cruzio.com>
    wrote:

    On Sat, 1 Feb 2025 21:06:45 +0100, "Carlos E.R."
    <robin_listas@es.invalid> wrote:

    On 2025-02-01 06:19, Jeff Liebermann wrote:
    On Sat, 01 Feb 2025 00:28:24 +0000, Cursitor Doom <cd@notformail.com>
    wrote:


    Wasn't it HP that was spying on customers by some ingenious yellow
    pixel scheme? Then made some excuse about catching forgers or some
    such claim.

    The yellow dots are for identifying the printer for tracking ransom
    notes, forgeries, fake documents, currency, etc. The yellow dots are
    why your printer runs out of yellow toner or ink before the other
    toner colors. See:

    Are they still doing this? :-o

    As far as I know, and can determine from skimming various related web >>sites, they're all doing it and have not added any way to turn it off.

    <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Printer_tracking_dots>
    <https://www.instructables.com/Yellow-Dots-of-Mystery-Is-Your-Printer-Spying-on-/>

    Methinks this is where the "spying" story may have originated:
    "Tracking codes in photocopiers and colour laser printers"
    (Aug 11, 2007)
    <https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/E-6-2007-5724_EN.html>

    If you want to see the yellow dots, you'll need a UV LED flashlight. I >>>> had the not-so-bright idea of pouring some black toner into an old
    yellow toner cartridge. The dots were easily visible with a
    magnifying glass. However, it took me about an hour to clean up the
    transfer belt mechanism so that yellow would print normally. Not
    recommended.

    I carefully examined printouts from my printer long ago, did not find >>>anything.

    I examined some prints last night and also couldn't find any yellow
    dots. Brain function returned this morning when I realized that I was >>looking at B&W prints from my monochrome laser printer. Yellow dots >>require yellow toner. I'll try again, this time using my HP Color
    Laser Jet Pro MFP M477fnw printer.

    I found the yellow dots, but it wasn't easy. As usual, I did
    everything wrong the first time I tried it.

    1. Use a magnifier. I found that a folding jewelers 30x loupe, with
    a built in white LED, worked well. This what I used: ><https://www.ebay.com/itm/116331398465>
    Both loupes were low quality, but the price was right. The UV light
    didn't do anything useful. I could try using one of my microscopes,
    but the kitchen table is currently occupied.

    2. Don't use paper with a rough or textured (linen, felt, laid, etc) >surface. Try to find paper with a smooth surface. If it looks like
    the surface of the moon with a magnifier, find some other paper.

    3. Some articles suggest using UV illumination. I have a wide
    variety of UV lights in both LED and fluorescent in various
    wavelengths. However, yellow toner is not phosphorescent, so it must
    be the phosphors they add to paper to make them appear "bright". Sure >enough, UV illumination worked best with 96 bright paper. I didn't
    have any 100 bright. However, UV illumination didn't improve
    visibility much.

    4. The tiny dots seem unevenly spread over the surface of the paper.
    You'll need to move the magnifying glass around the page to find the
    yellow dots. At 30x the depth of field is small. That means put the
    printed page on something flat.

    5. When I first started looking for the dots, I almost instantly saw
    them. About 1 minute later, the dots disappeared. What happened is
    that I had cataract surgery about 1 year ago. The problem was that it
    wasn't totally successful. As soon as I was able to rest my eyes a
    little, the dots re-appeared.

    6. I guessed that the designers did not include a feature where the
    dots moved around the page after each printed page. Therefore,
    over-printing the same page multiple times should improve visibility. >Unfortunately, my laser printer has a registration problem causing the >overprinted dots and text on the page to move. However, I have more
    dots to view. I found more barely visible yellow dots, but also a few
    very bright yellow dots.

    It's my understanding that the yellow dots also appear when "printing"
    to a file. I suspect that printing on dark paper will improve the
    contrast and make the yellow dots more visible. I would guess(tm)
    that a yellow filter might also help improve contrast. I haven't
    tried any of these (yet).

    Good luck.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Printer_tracking_dots

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jeff Liebermann@21:1/5 to john larkin on Sat Feb 1 17:07:25 2025
    XPost: sci.electronics.repair, alt.home.repair

    On Sat, 01 Feb 2025 15:45:36 -0800, john larkin <JL@gct.com> wrote:

    On Sat, 01 Feb 2025 15:29:51 -0800, Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@cruzio.com>
    wrote:

    On Sat, 01 Feb 2025 14:02:57 -0800, Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@cruzio.com> >>wrote:

    On Sat, 1 Feb 2025 21:06:45 +0100, "Carlos E.R." >>><robin_listas@es.invalid> wrote:

    On 2025-02-01 06:19, Jeff Liebermann wrote:
    On Sat, 01 Feb 2025 00:28:24 +0000, Cursitor Doom <cd@notformail.com> >>>>> wrote:


    Wasn't it HP that was spying on customers by some ingenious yellow >>>>>> pixel scheme? Then made some excuse about catching forgers or some >>>>>> such claim.

    The yellow dots are for identifying the printer for tracking ransom
    notes, forgeries, fake documents, currency, etc. The yellow dots are >>>>> why your printer runs out of yellow toner or ink before the other
    toner colors. See:

    Are they still doing this? :-o

    As far as I know, and can determine from skimming various related web >>>sites, they're all doing it and have not added any way to turn it off.

    <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Printer_tracking_dots>
    <https://www.instructables.com/Yellow-Dots-of-Mystery-Is-Your-Printer-Spying-on-/>

    Methinks this is where the "spying" story may have originated:
    "Tracking codes in photocopiers and colour laser printers"
    (Aug 11, 2007)
    <https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/E-6-2007-5724_EN.html> >>>>>
    If you want to see the yellow dots, you'll need a UV LED flashlight. I >>>>> had the not-so-bright idea of pouring some black toner into an old
    yellow toner cartridge. The dots were easily visible with a
    magnifying glass. However, it took me about an hour to clean up the >>>>> transfer belt mechanism so that yellow would print normally. Not
    recommended.

    I carefully examined printouts from my printer long ago, did not find >>>>anything.

    I examined some prints last night and also couldn't find any yellow
    dots. Brain function returned this morning when I realized that I was >>>looking at B&W prints from my monochrome laser printer. Yellow dots >>>require yellow toner. I'll try again, this time using my HP Color
    Laser Jet Pro MFP M477fnw printer.

    I found the yellow dots, but it wasn't easy. As usual, I did
    everything wrong the first time I tried it.

    1. Use a magnifier. I found that a folding jewelers 30x loupe, with
    a built in white LED, worked well. This what I used: >><https://www.ebay.com/itm/116331398465>
    Both loupes were low quality, but the price was right. The UV light
    didn't do anything useful. I could try using one of my microscopes,
    but the kitchen table is currently occupied.

    2. Don't use paper with a rough or textured (linen, felt, laid, etc) >>surface. Try to find paper with a smooth surface. If it looks like
    the surface of the moon with a magnifier, find some other paper.

    3. Some articles suggest using UV illumination. I have a wide
    variety of UV lights in both LED and fluorescent in various
    wavelengths. However, yellow toner is not phosphorescent, so it must
    be the phosphors they add to paper to make them appear "bright". Sure >>enough, UV illumination worked best with 96 bright paper. I didn't
    have any 100 bright. However, UV illumination didn't improve
    visibility much.

    4. The tiny dots seem unevenly spread over the surface of the paper. >>You'll need to move the magnifying glass around the page to find the
    yellow dots. At 30x the depth of field is small. That means put the >>printed page on something flat.

    5. When I first started looking for the dots, I almost instantly saw
    them. About 1 minute later, the dots disappeared. What happened is
    that I had cataract surgery about 1 year ago. The problem was that it >>wasn't totally successful. As soon as I was able to rest my eyes a
    little, the dots re-appeared.

    6. I guessed that the designers did not include a feature where the
    dots moved around the page after each printed page. Therefore, >>over-printing the same page multiple times should improve visibility. >>Unfortunately, my laser printer has a registration problem causing the >>overprinted dots and text on the page to move. However, I have more
    dots to view. I found more barely visible yellow dots, but also a few
    very bright yellow dots.

    It's my understanding that the yellow dots also appear when "printing"
    to a file. I suspect that printing on dark paper will improve the
    contrast and make the yellow dots more visible. I would guess(tm)
    that a yellow filter might also help improve contrast. I haven't
    tried any of these (yet).

    Good luck.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Printer_tracking_dots

    I already posted that link a few messages upstream. It doesn't say
    much about how to best view the dots. So, I went to YouTube (as
    suggested).

    Here's one that features your favorite microscope:
    "Yellow Dots of Mystery: Is Your Printer Spying on You?" <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sit6zUQKpJc>

    and one from EFF:
    "Yellow Dots of Mystery: Is Your Printer Spying on You?" <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=izMGMsIZK4U>

    As usual, I was doing it all wrong. I tried illuminating with UV, but
    should have used a blue LED and turned off the room lights.

    Dots all folks.
    --
    Jeff Liebermann jeffl@cruzio.com
    PO Box 272 http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
    Ben Lomond CA 95005-0272
    Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jeff Liebermann@21:1/5 to All on Sat Feb 1 18:19:53 2025
    On Sat, 01 Feb 2025 18:39:11 -0500, Joe Gwinn <joegwinn@comcast.net>
    wrote:

    On Sat, 01 Feb 2025 09:57:51 -0800, Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@cruzio.com>
    wrote:

    On Sat, 01 Feb 2025 11:07:18 -0500, Joe Gwinn <joegwinn@comcast.net>
    wrote:

    Very interesting in general, and I just bought a Brother MFC-L8905CDW. >>>Have you encountered any of those yet?

    What the above replaced was an ancient Brother MFC-9840CDW, and I did >>>have and repair many problems, and got 15 years out of it.

    I retired from the daily grind just after the CZU fire and Covid. I >>currently don't see many repairs on larger and heavier printers
    because I would need to carry the printers up and down 50 stairs to
    work on them. I also don't have the necessary bench space available.
    My current customers are mostly home users who normally don't need or >>purchase big and heavy business class printers.

    I tend to buy the industrial stuff, but at their lower end, because
    the extra expense is worth it for better quality.

    For printers, I buy new printers for my customers and inherit their
    previous printer for free or at least a substantial discount on my
    labor charges.

    An industrial printer is what's used for commercial production
    printing. These are well above the needs of the typical small
    business. For example, what small business needs a printer that can continuously print bills, promotional literature, tickets, etc all day
    long? Running a business class printer continuously like that would
    kill it rather soon. At this time, business class can perhaps print
    25,000 pages before requiring all the plastic and rubber parts need to
    be replaced. I've maintained ancient LaserJet 4 and 4 Si printers,
    which printed about 125,000 pages before needing any major service.
    Yes, that would be nice for home use, but certainly overkill. HP and
    others realized that such a long life printer would not be a good
    thing for a company that made and sold printers, so they redesigned
    the stamped steel tank of a printer into a lower cost but shorter life
    all plastic toy.

    Sometimes the industrial stuff is cheaper as well. Like for instance
    metro wire shelves.

    <https://metro.com/commercial/>
    I have several rows of those shelves (on rollers) in what used to be
    my bedroom. When I retired and closed my formerly palatial office,
    all the storage racks and most of the junk on them, were transported
    intact into my house. The #1 project for the last 4 years has been to
    purge the junk and get rid of the industrial warehouse decor.

    And one of my selection criteria was weight, with heavier preferred
    (meaning more metal and less plastic).

    As I get older, cost has become the primary criteria. I don't expect
    or want to live longer than my furniture and toys.

    I haven't worked on any MFC-L8905CDW printers but have recently
    cleaned a similar model after an aftermarket toner cartridge dumped
    toner everywhere. I didn't see anything unusual when I tested it. >><https://www.brother-usa.com/products/mfcl8905cdw>

    The old MFC-9840CDW (discontinued) was not a good printer. >><https://www.google.com/search?q=MFC-9840CDW&udm=2>
    Two of my customers bought them many years ago. As I vaguely recall,
    the colors did not print true, the color self-calibration didn't quite >>work, and I had to clean toner from the belt with almost every
    cartridge change.

    The color was never all that good to be sure, but it was good enough
    for me. Nor did I clean the belt all that often.

    I'm told that it is possible to get descent color from the Brother
    MFC-9840CDW. However, it requires tearing it apart and cleaning the
    toner dust off the color calibration optics and sensors. To maintain
    the color settings, don't let loose toner collect inside the machine, especially around the waste box. <https://www.amazon.com/NUCALA-Compatible-WT100CL-Replacement-DCP-9040CN/dp/B0BHSHDHMQ>
    Notice that waste toner box is only good for:
    Page volume: Approximately 20,500 pages with 5% coverage.
    As you approach this limit, clean out the waste toner box or you will
    soon be dealing with a big mess. (Clue: Nobody does this until it's
    too late).

    I don't recall any component failures or
    replacement. The rubber parts, which are usually the first to die,
    held up well, mostly because the printer was lightly used.

    It worked well for many years, but it developed problems as it became >elderly. In all cases, the underlying problem was that some rubber or >plastic component had aged and become glazed. Disassembly and
    cleaning with a fiberglass brush followed by ethanol wiping helped a
    lot. The famed "Stable 32" error was fixed by a carefully placed
    piece of mylar tape that prevented sticking.

    Ummmm... I think you mean "Print Unable 32" error message. The means
    you have either paper, or more likely labels, stuck on the rollers or
    drum. If it's the fuser roller or imager drum, and you get anywhere
    near them with any kind of cleaner or solvent, you'll destroy the
    coating. Don't ask me how I learned this fact. Even isopropyl
    alcohol is to strong. Instead, I use hot water, to melt the stick
    label glue or scrape off the glue with a Teflon kitchen scraper.

    I won't say anything about resurfacing the roller using mylar tape
    except that I've never tried it, don't think it will work, and have no intention of trying it.

    Also, most of the solvents will attack rubber and cause it swell.
    Resurfacing the rubber rollers with wire bushes, sandpaper, file
    cards, and other mechanical methods will work if the rubber is
    reasonably intact.

    The way it works is that the rubber cracks as the plasticizer
    evaporates from the rubber. It's the plasticizer that makes the
    rubber flexible. It also provides a high friction surface. What
    alcohol and other solvents do is remove the plasticizer. This causes
    the rubber roller to swell and eventually harden. Whenever I found a
    rock hard rubber roller, it was either from old age or someone had
    tried to clean the roller with alcohol.

    I once bought a bottle of "rubber renewer" on eBay. Nasty smelling
    stuff but it did the job. It seemed to be a mixture of xylene and
    some kind of oil. The idea was to expand the cracked rubber surface
    which allowed the oil to migrate into the cracks. Xylene evaporates
    very quickly which prevents deep penetration in the rubber. That
    allows enough oil to replace any lost plasticizer and also not turn
    the rubber surface into a sticky goo. It worked fairly well, but a
    new replacement rubber roller lasted longer. If possible, I flipped
    over the rubber on plastic rollers before using rubber restorer. <https://www.ebay.com/sch/i.html?_nkw=rubber%20restorer%20printer%20rollers>

    But finally it all had worn out too much, and the common wear-out
    parts could no longer be purchased anywhere. And while toner was
    still available, the large-capacity cartridges were not, which I took
    as an omen.

    And after 15 years, it owed me nothing, and many things were greatly
    improved over those years. The new printer is twice as fast as the
    old printer, and the color is far better. And does not misfeed when
    humidity is low.


    Try:
    <https://www.ifixit.com/Answers/Device/Brother_Printer> >><https://www.printerforums.net/forums/brother.19/>

    Will do, thanks

    Joe Gwinn
    --
    Jeff Liebermann jeffl@cruzio.com
    PO Box 272 http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
    Ben Lomond CA 95005-0272
    Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Lizard Cheney@21:1/5 to Jeff Liebermann on Sun Feb 2 11:31:29 2025
    XPost: sci.electronics.repair, alt.home.repair

    Jeff Liebermann wrote:
    On Sat, 01 Feb 2025 15:45:36 -0800, john larkin <JL@gct.com> wrote:

    On Sat, 01 Feb 2025 15:29:51 -0800, Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@cruzio.com>
    wrote:

    On Sat, 01 Feb 2025 14:02:57 -0800, Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@cruzio.com>
    wrote:

    On Sat, 1 Feb 2025 21:06:45 +0100, "Carlos E.R."
    <robin_listas@es.invalid> wrote:

    On 2025-02-01 06:19, Jeff Liebermann wrote:
    On Sat, 01 Feb 2025 00:28:24 +0000, Cursitor Doom <cd@notformail.com> >>>>>> wrote:

    Wasn't it HP that was spying on customers by some ingenious yellow >>>>>>> pixel scheme? Then made some excuse about catching forgers or some >>>>>>> such claim.
    The yellow dots are for identifying the printer for tracking ransom >>>>>> notes, forgeries, fake documents, currency, etc. The yellow dots are >>>>>> why your printer runs out of yellow toner or ink before the other
    toner colors. See:
    Are they still doing this? :-o
    As far as I know, and can determine from skimming various related web
    sites, they're all doing it and have not added any way to turn it off. >>>>
    <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Printer_tracking_dots>
    <https://www.instructables.com/Yellow-Dots-of-Mystery-Is-Your-Printer-Spying-on-/>

    Methinks this is where the "spying" story may have originated:
    "Tracking codes in photocopiers and colour laser printers"
    (Aug 11, 2007)
    <https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/E-6-2007-5724_EN.html> >>>>>>
    If you want to see the yellow dots, you'll need a UV LED flashlight. I >>>>>> had the not-so-bright idea of pouring some black toner into an old >>>>>> yellow toner cartridge. The dots were easily visible with a
    magnifying glass. However, it took me about an hour to clean up the >>>>>> transfer belt mechanism so that yellow would print normally. Not
    recommended.
    I carefully examined printouts from my printer long ago, did not find >>>>> anything.
    I examined some prints last night and also couldn't find any yellow
    dots. Brain function returned this morning when I realized that I was >>>> looking at B&W prints from my monochrome laser printer. Yellow dots
    require yellow toner. I'll try again, this time using my HP Color
    Laser Jet Pro MFP M477fnw printer.
    I found the yellow dots, but it wasn't easy. As usual, I did
    everything wrong the first time I tried it.

    1. Use a magnifier. I found that a folding jewelers 30x loupe, with
    a built in white LED, worked well. This what I used:
    <https://www.ebay.com/itm/116331398465>
    Both loupes were low quality, but the price was right. The UV light
    didn't do anything useful. I could try using one of my microscopes,
    but the kitchen table is currently occupied.

    2. Don't use paper with a rough or textured (linen, felt, laid, etc)
    surface. Try to find paper with a smooth surface. If it looks like
    the surface of the moon with a magnifier, find some other paper.

    3. Some articles suggest using UV illumination. I have a wide
    variety of UV lights in both LED and fluorescent in various
    wavelengths. However, yellow toner is not phosphorescent, so it must
    be the phosphors they add to paper to make them appear "bright". Sure
    enough, UV illumination worked best with 96 bright paper. I didn't
    have any 100 bright. However, UV illumination didn't improve
    visibility much.

    4. The tiny dots seem unevenly spread over the surface of the paper.
    You'll need to move the magnifying glass around the page to find the
    yellow dots. At 30x the depth of field is small. That means put the
    printed page on something flat.

    5. When I first started looking for the dots, I almost instantly saw
    them. About 1 minute later, the dots disappeared. What happened is
    that I had cataract surgery about 1 year ago. The problem was that it
    wasn't totally successful. As soon as I was able to rest my eyes a
    little, the dots re-appeared.

    6. I guessed that the designers did not include a feature where the
    dots moved around the page after each printed page. Therefore,
    over-printing the same page multiple times should improve visibility.
    Unfortunately, my laser printer has a registration problem causing the
    overprinted dots and text on the page to move. However, I have more
    dots to view. I found more barely visible yellow dots, but also a few
    very bright yellow dots.

    It's my understanding that the yellow dots also appear when "printing"
    to a file. I suspect that printing on dark paper will improve the
    contrast and make the yellow dots more visible. I would guess(tm)
    that a yellow filter might also help improve contrast. I haven't
    tried any of these (yet).

    Good luck.
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Printer_tracking_dots
    I already posted that link a few messages upstream. It doesn't say
    much about how to best view the dots. So, I went to YouTube (as
    suggested).

    Here's one that features your favorite microscope:
    "Yellow Dots of Mystery: Is Your Printer Spying on You?" <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sit6zUQKpJc>

    and one from EFF:
    "Yellow Dots of Mystery: Is Your Printer Spying on You?" <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=izMGMsIZK4U>

    As usual, I was doing it all wrong. I tried illuminating with UV, but
    should have used a blue LED and turned off the room lights.

    Dots all folks.

    I suspect Obamba's fake birth certificate has yellow dots on it.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jeff Liebermann@21:1/5 to lizard.cheney@j6.insurrection.dept on Sun Feb 2 09:48:56 2025
    XPost: sci.electronics.repair, alt.home.repair

    On Sun, 02 Feb 25 11:31:29 UTC, Lizard Cheney <lizard.cheney@j6.insurrection.dept> wrote:

    Jeff Liebermann wrote:
    Dots all folks.

    <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0FHEeG_uq5Y>

    I suspect Obamba's fake birth certificate has yellow dots on it.

    Nope. It was printed using a monochrome typewriter. We didn't have
    color laser printers in 1961: <https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/sites/default/files/rss_viewer/birth-certificate-long-form.pdf>

    --
    Jeff Liebermann jeffl@cruzio.com
    PO Box 272 http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
    Ben Lomond CA 95005-0272
    Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Cursitor Doom@21:1/5 to All on Sun Feb 2 18:25:00 2025
    XPost: sci.electronics.repair, alt.home.repair

    On Sun, 02 Feb 2025 09:48:56 -0800, Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@cruzio.com>
    wrote:

    On Sun, 02 Feb 25 11:31:29 UTC, Lizard Cheney ><lizard.cheney@j6.insurrection.dept> wrote:

    Jeff Liebermann wrote:
    Dots all folks.

    <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0FHEeG_uq5Y>

    I suspect Obamba's fake birth certificate has yellow dots on it.

    Nope. It was printed using a monochrome typewriter. We didn't have
    color laser printers in 1961: ><https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/sites/default/files/rss_viewer/birth-certificate-long-form.pdf>

    That's not the same certificate that was originally posted on the
    White House website and caused all the furore around the forgery
    accusations, though.
    The original image was a clumsy composite paste-up job and a clear and
    obvious forgery. This is a different image altogether (but at least
    this time they've remembered to flatten it!)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Joe Gwinn@21:1/5 to All on Sun Feb 2 13:43:18 2025
    On Sat, 01 Feb 2025 18:19:53 -0800, Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@cruzio.com>
    wrote:

    On Sat, 01 Feb 2025 18:39:11 -0500, Joe Gwinn <joegwinn@comcast.net>
    wrote:

    On Sat, 01 Feb 2025 09:57:51 -0800, Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@cruzio.com> >>wrote:

    On Sat, 01 Feb 2025 11:07:18 -0500, Joe Gwinn <joegwinn@comcast.net> >>>wrote:

    Very interesting in general, and I just bought a Brother MFC-L8905CDW. >>>>Have you encountered any of those yet?

    What the above replaced was an ancient Brother MFC-9840CDW, and I did >>>>have and repair many problems, and got 15 years out of it.

    I retired from the daily grind just after the CZU fire and Covid. I >>>currently don't see many repairs on larger and heavier printers
    because I would need to carry the printers up and down 50 stairs to
    work on them. I also don't have the necessary bench space available.
    My current customers are mostly home users who normally don't need or >>>purchase big and heavy business class printers.

    I tend to buy the industrial stuff, but at their lower end, because
    the extra expense is worth it for better quality.

    For printers, I buy new printers for my customers and inherit their
    previous printer for free or at least a substantial discount on my
    labor charges.

    Here I am both customer and tech.


    An industrial printer is what's used for commercial production
    printing. These are well above the needs of the typical small
    business.

    Yes, and these cost tens of thousands of dollars minimum. Only large
    companies have these.


    For example, what small business needs a printer that can
    continuously print bills, promotional literature, tickets, etc all day
    long? Running a business class printer continuously like that would
    kill it rather soon. At this time, business class can perhaps print
    25,000 pages before requiring all the plastic and rubber parts need to
    be replaced.

    That would be a the all-plastic wonders. I've gotten far more from
    the Brother, and from the legacy HP printers that proceeded it.

    My first laser was a HP LaserJet 5MP bought in 1996 for about $1K, as
    I recall. It needed few repairs, although I did upgrade the memory to
    max when that became cheap. I finally recycled it circa 2015. It
    still worked, but with crippling limitations, like inability to handle
    most modern print file formats. And sunlight had made some critical
    plastic components to become brittle and crack.


    I've maintained ancient LaserJet 4 and 4 Si printers,
    which printed about 125,000 pages before needing any major service.
    Yes, that would be nice for home use, but certainly overkill. HP and
    others realized that such a long life printer would not be a good
    thing for a company that made and sold printers, so they redesigned
    the stamped steel tank of a printer into a lower cost but shorter life
    all plastic toy.

    Yes. But I've found the Brother units quite suitable. Also, this is
    not just a printer, it's an all-in-one units.


    Sometimes the industrial stuff is cheaper as well. Like for instance
    metro wire shelves.

    <https://metro.com/commercial/>
    I have several rows of those shelves (on rollers) in what used to be
    my bedroom. When I retired and closed my formerly palatial office,
    all the storage racks and most of the junk on them, were transported
    intact into my house. The #1 project for the last 4 years has been to
    purge the junk and get rid of the industrial warehouse decor.

    And one of my selection criteria was weight, with heavier preferred >>(meaning more metal and less plastic).

    As I get older, cost has become the primary criteria. I don't expect
    or want to live longer than my furniture and toys.

    I also won't have the energy or maybe ability to do much repairing as
    I get grayer and grayer.


    I haven't worked on any MFC-L8905CDW printers but have recently
    cleaned a similar model after an aftermarket toner cartridge dumped
    toner everywhere. I didn't see anything unusual when I tested it. >>><https://www.brother-usa.com/products/mfcl8905cdw>

    The old MFC-9840CDW (discontinued) was not a good printer. >>><https://www.google.com/search?q=MFC-9840CDW&udm=2>
    Two of my customers bought them many years ago. As I vaguely recall,
    the colors did not print true, the color self-calibration didn't quite >>>work, and I had to clean toner from the belt with almost every
    cartridge change.

    The color was never all that good to be sure, but it was good enough
    for me. Nor did I clean the belt all that often.

    I'm told that it is possible to get descent color from the Brother >MFC-9840CDW. However, it requires tearing it apart and cleaning the
    toner dust off the color calibration optics and sensors.

    Ahh. So that's why. Wonder if Brother has improved that part of the
    design. One assumes so, after 15 years.


    To maintain
    the color settings, don't let loose toner collect inside the machine, >especially around the waste box. ><https://www.amazon.com/NUCALA-Compatible-WT100CL-Replacement-DCP-9040CN/dp/B0BHSHDHMQ>
    Notice that waste toner box is only good for:
    Page volume: Approximately 20,500 pages with 5% coverage.
    As you approach this limit, clean out the waste toner box or you will
    soon be dealing with a big mess. (Clue: Nobody does this until it's
    too late).

    Hmm. The 9840 started to complains about that, so I dutifully
    replaced the waste toner box well in time.


    I don't recall any component failures or
    replacement. The rubber parts, which are usually the first to die,
    held up well, mostly because the printer was lightly used.

    It worked well for many years, but it developed problems as it became >>elderly. In all cases, the underlying problem was that some rubber or >>plastic component had aged and become glazed. Disassembly and
    cleaning with a fiberglass brush followed by ethanol wiping helped a
    lot. The famed "Stable 32" error was fixed by a carefully placed
    piece of mylar tape that prevented sticking.

    Ummmm... I think you mean "Print Unable 32" error message. The means
    you have either paper, or more likely labels, stuck on the rollers or
    drum. If it's the fuser roller or imager drum, and you get anywhere
    near them with any kind of cleaner or solvent, you'll destroy the
    coating. Don't ask me how I learned this fact. Even isopropyl
    alcohol is to strong. Instead, I use hot water, to melt the stick
    label glue or scrape off the glue with a Teflon kitchen scraper.

    Yes, its "Print Unable 32". I don't print labels or the like. Or
    envelopes. Too much trouble.


    I won't say anything about resurfacing the roller using mylar tape
    except that I've never tried it, don't think it will work, and have no >intention of trying it.

    The piece of tape was on a location sensing pad of some kind; don't
    recall where. The rollers I was resurfacing were made of rubber of
    some kind, and were not destroyed by this treatment.


    Also, most of the solvents will attack rubber and cause it swell.
    Resurfacing the rubber rollers with wire bushes, sandpaper, file
    cards, and other mechanical methods will work if the rubber is
    reasonably intact.

    Ethanol is safe.


    The way it works is that the rubber cracks as the plasticizer
    evaporates from the rubber. It's the plasticizer that makes the
    rubber flexible. It also provides a high friction surface. What
    alcohol and other solvents do is remove the plasticizer. This causes
    the rubber roller to swell and eventually harden. Whenever I found a
    rock hard rubber roller, it was either from old age or someone had
    tried to clean the roller with alcohol.

    The rollers that needed the treatment were already glazed, probably
    due to plasticizer evaporation, and the objective was to physically
    remove the hardened layer and remove the sanding grit and debris using
    the ethanol. This did not re-glaze the rollers. The exposure was
    short.


    I once bought a bottle of "rubber renewer" on eBay. Nasty smelling
    stuff but it did the job. It seemed to be a mixture of xylene and
    some kind of oil. The idea was to expand the cracked rubber surface
    which allowed the oil to migrate into the cracks. Xylene evaporates
    very quickly which prevents deep penetration in the rubber. That
    allows enough oil to replace any lost plasticizer and also not turn
    the rubber surface into a sticky goo. It worked fairly well, but a
    new replacement rubber roller lasted longer. If possible, I flipped
    over the rubber on plastic rollers before using rubber restorer. ><https://www.ebay.com/sch/i.html?_nkw=rubber%20restorer%20printer%20rollers>

    I looked at that. It lists C3H8O and C8H8O3 as ingredients.

    The first is also known as isopropyl alcohol.

    The second is probably a plasticizer, but many chemicals answer to
    that formula, maybe it's what is used in platen rubber rollers during manufacture.

    I would guess that there is no Xylene ((CH3)2C6H4), or it would have
    been mentioned.

    I did not find out who is making this stuff, and it may be a one-man
    operation.

    Joe Gwinn

    But finally it all had worn out too much, and the common wear-out
    parts could no longer be purchased anywhere. And while toner was
    still available, the large-capacity cartridges were not, which I took
    as an omen.

    And after 15 years, it owed me nothing, and many things were greatly >>improved over those years. The new printer is twice as fast as the
    old printer, and the color is far better. And does not misfeed when >>humidity is low.


    Try:
    <https://www.ifixit.com/Answers/Device/Brother_Printer> >>><https://www.printerforums.net/forums/brother.19/>

    Will do, thanks

    Joe Gwinn

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Joe Gwinn@21:1/5 to All on Sun Feb 2 16:21:43 2025
    I may have identified the C8H8O3 compound. Wintergreen Oil fits the
    bill.

    .<https://www.wikihow.com/Soften-Rubber> Method 3

    .<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Methyl_salicylate>

    .<https://www.amazon.com/Salicylate-Wintergreen-Softening-Hardened-Products/dp/B0D6R9J83D>

    I'm betting that the rubber restorer is one guy who read the WikiHow
    article.

    Joe Gwinn


    On Sun, 02 Feb 2025 13:43:18 -0500, Joe Gwinn <joegwinn@comcast.net>
    wrote:

    On Sat, 01 Feb 2025 18:19:53 -0800, Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@cruzio.com>
    wrote:

    On Sat, 01 Feb 2025 18:39:11 -0500, Joe Gwinn <joegwinn@comcast.net>
    wrote:

    On Sat, 01 Feb 2025 09:57:51 -0800, Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@cruzio.com> >>>wrote:

    On Sat, 01 Feb 2025 11:07:18 -0500, Joe Gwinn <joegwinn@comcast.net> >>>>wrote:

    Very interesting in general, and I just bought a Brother MFC-L8905CDW. >>>>>Have you encountered any of those yet?

    What the above replaced was an ancient Brother MFC-9840CDW, and I did >>>>>have and repair many problems, and got 15 years out of it.

    I retired from the daily grind just after the CZU fire and Covid. I >>>>currently don't see many repairs on larger and heavier printers
    because I would need to carry the printers up and down 50 stairs to >>>>work on them. I also don't have the necessary bench space available. >>>>My current customers are mostly home users who normally don't need or >>>>purchase big and heavy business class printers.

    I tend to buy the industrial stuff, but at their lower end, because
    the extra expense is worth it for better quality.

    For printers, I buy new printers for my customers and inherit their >>previous printer for free or at least a substantial discount on my
    labor charges.

    Here I am both customer and tech.


    An industrial printer is what's used for commercial production
    printing. These are well above the needs of the typical small
    business.

    Yes, and these cost tens of thousands of dollars minimum. Only large >companies have these.


    For example, what small business needs a printer that can
    continuously print bills, promotional literature, tickets, etc all day >>long? Running a business class printer continuously like that would
    kill it rather soon. At this time, business class can perhaps print
    25,000 pages before requiring all the plastic and rubber parts need to
    be replaced.

    That would be a the all-plastic wonders. I've gotten far more from
    the Brother, and from the legacy HP printers that proceeded it.

    My first laser was a HP LaserJet 5MP bought in 1996 for about $1K, as
    I recall. It needed few repairs, although I did upgrade the memory to
    max when that became cheap. I finally recycled it circa 2015. It
    still worked, but with crippling limitations, like inability to handle
    most modern print file formats. And sunlight had made some critical
    plastic components to become brittle and crack.


    I've maintained ancient LaserJet 4 and 4 Si printers,
    which printed about 125,000 pages before needing any major service.
    Yes, that would be nice for home use, but certainly overkill. HP and >>others realized that such a long life printer would not be a good
    thing for a company that made and sold printers, so they redesigned
    the stamped steel tank of a printer into a lower cost but shorter life
    all plastic toy.

    Yes. But I've found the Brother units quite suitable. Also, this is
    not just a printer, it's an all-in-one units.


    Sometimes the industrial stuff is cheaper as well. Like for instance >>>metro wire shelves.

    <https://metro.com/commercial/>
    I have several rows of those shelves (on rollers) in what used to be
    my bedroom. When I retired and closed my formerly palatial office,
    all the storage racks and most of the junk on them, were transported
    intact into my house. The #1 project for the last 4 years has been to >>purge the junk and get rid of the industrial warehouse decor.

    And one of my selection criteria was weight, with heavier preferred >>>(meaning more metal and less plastic).

    As I get older, cost has become the primary criteria. I don't expect
    or want to live longer than my furniture and toys.

    I also won't have the energy or maybe ability to do much repairing as
    I get grayer and grayer.


    I haven't worked on any MFC-L8905CDW printers but have recently
    cleaned a similar model after an aftermarket toner cartridge dumped >>>>toner everywhere. I didn't see anything unusual when I tested it. >>>><https://www.brother-usa.com/products/mfcl8905cdw>

    The old MFC-9840CDW (discontinued) was not a good printer. >>>><https://www.google.com/search?q=MFC-9840CDW&udm=2>
    Two of my customers bought them many years ago. As I vaguely recall, >>>>the colors did not print true, the color self-calibration didn't quite >>>>work, and I had to clean toner from the belt with almost every >>>>cartridge change.

    The color was never all that good to be sure, but it was good enough
    for me. Nor did I clean the belt all that often.

    I'm told that it is possible to get descent color from the Brother >>MFC-9840CDW. However, it requires tearing it apart and cleaning the
    toner dust off the color calibration optics and sensors.

    Ahh. So that's why. Wonder if Brother has improved that part of the
    design. One assumes so, after 15 years.


    To maintain
    the color settings, don't let loose toner collect inside the machine, >>especially around the waste box. >><https://www.amazon.com/NUCALA-Compatible-WT100CL-Replacement-DCP-9040CN/dp/B0BHSHDHMQ>
    Notice that waste toner box is only good for:
    Page volume: Approximately 20,500 pages with 5% coverage.
    As you approach this limit, clean out the waste toner box or you will
    soon be dealing with a big mess. (Clue: Nobody does this until it's
    too late).

    Hmm. The 9840 started to complains about that, so I dutifully
    replaced the waste toner box well in time.


    I don't recall any component failures or
    replacement. The rubber parts, which are usually the first to die, >>>>held up well, mostly because the printer was lightly used.

    It worked well for many years, but it developed problems as it became >>>elderly. In all cases, the underlying problem was that some rubber or >>>plastic component had aged and become glazed. Disassembly and
    cleaning with a fiberglass brush followed by ethanol wiping helped a
    lot. The famed "Stable 32" error was fixed by a carefully placed
    piece of mylar tape that prevented sticking.

    Ummmm... I think you mean "Print Unable 32" error message. The means
    you have either paper, or more likely labels, stuck on the rollers or
    drum. If it's the fuser roller or imager drum, and you get anywhere
    near them with any kind of cleaner or solvent, you'll destroy the
    coating. Don't ask me how I learned this fact. Even isopropyl
    alcohol is to strong. Instead, I use hot water, to melt the stick
    label glue or scrape off the glue with a Teflon kitchen scraper.

    Yes, its "Print Unable 32". I don't print labels or the like. Or
    envelopes. Too much trouble.


    I won't say anything about resurfacing the roller using mylar tape
    except that I've never tried it, don't think it will work, and have no >>intention of trying it.

    The piece of tape was on a location sensing pad of some kind; don't
    recall where. The rollers I was resurfacing were made of rubber of
    some kind, and were not destroyed by this treatment.


    Also, most of the solvents will attack rubber and cause it swell. >>Resurfacing the rubber rollers with wire bushes, sandpaper, file
    cards, and other mechanical methods will work if the rubber is
    reasonably intact.

    Ethanol is safe.


    The way it works is that the rubber cracks as the plasticizer
    evaporates from the rubber. It's the plasticizer that makes the
    rubber flexible. It also provides a high friction surface. What
    alcohol and other solvents do is remove the plasticizer. This causes
    the rubber roller to swell and eventually harden. Whenever I found a
    rock hard rubber roller, it was either from old age or someone had
    tried to clean the roller with alcohol.

    The rollers that needed the treatment were already glazed, probably
    due to plasticizer evaporation, and the objective was to physically
    remove the hardened layer and remove the sanding grit and debris using
    the ethanol. This did not re-glaze the rollers. The exposure was
    short.


    I once bought a bottle of "rubber renewer" on eBay. Nasty smelling
    stuff but it did the job. It seemed to be a mixture of xylene and
    some kind of oil. The idea was to expand the cracked rubber surface
    which allowed the oil to migrate into the cracks. Xylene evaporates
    very quickly which prevents deep penetration in the rubber. That
    allows enough oil to replace any lost plasticizer and also not turn
    the rubber surface into a sticky goo. It worked fairly well, but a
    new replacement rubber roller lasted longer. If possible, I flipped
    over the rubber on plastic rollers before using rubber restorer. >><https://www.ebay.com/sch/i.html?_nkw=rubber%20restorer%20printer%20rollers>

    I looked at that. It lists C3H8O and C8H8O3 as ingredients.

    The first is also known as isopropyl alcohol.

    The second is probably a plasticizer, but many chemicals answer to
    that formula, maybe it's what is used in platen rubber rollers during >manufacture.

    I would guess that there is no Xylene ((CH3)2C6H4), or it would have
    been mentioned.

    I did not find out who is making this stuff, and it may be a one-man >operation.

    Joe Gwinn

    But finally it all had worn out too much, and the common wear-out
    parts could no longer be purchased anywhere. And while toner was
    still available, the large-capacity cartridges were not, which I took
    as an omen.

    And after 15 years, it owed me nothing, and many things were greatly >>>improved over those years. The new printer is twice as fast as the
    old printer, and the color is far better. And does not misfeed when >>>humidity is low.


    Try:
    <https://www.ifixit.com/Answers/Device/Brother_Printer> >>>><https://www.printerforums.net/forums/brother.19/>

    Will do, thanks

    Joe Gwinn

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Lizard Cheney@21:1/5 to Jeff Liebermann on Mon Feb 3 10:59:37 2025
    XPost: sci.electronics.repair, alt.home.repair

    Jeff Liebermann wrote:
    On Sun, 02 Feb 25 11:31:29 UTC, Lizard Cheney <lizard.cheney@j6.insurrection.dept> wrote:

    Jeff Liebermann wrote:
    Dots all folks.
    <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0FHEeG_uq5Y>

    I suspect Obamba's fake birth certificate has yellow dots on it.
    Nope. It was printed using a monochrome typewriter. We didn't have
    color laser printers in 1961: <https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/sites/default/files/rss_viewer/birth-certificate-long-form.pdf>


    I suspect Barry's original certificate was printed in Kenya.

    Obammy's fake certificate was printed on some Deep State laser printer.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From micky@21:1/5 to lizard.cheney@j6.insurrection.dept on Mon Feb 3 14:01:00 2025
    XPost: sci.electronics.repair, alt.home.repair

    Please don't pollute a technical thread with political nonsense.
    Especially obsolete allegations, especially my thread.

    If you continue to do this, I won't include AHR in technical posts and
    you'll be an even bigger blight on AHR.


    In sci.electronics.repair, on Sun, 02 Feb 25 11:31:29 UTC, Lizard Cheney <lizard.cheney@j6.insurrection.dept> wrote:

    Jeff Liebermann wrote:
    On Sat, 01 Feb 2025 15:45:36 -0800, john larkin <JL@gct.com> wrote:

    On Sat, 01 Feb 2025 15:29:51 -0800, Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@cruzio.com>
    wrote:

    On Sat, 01 Feb 2025 14:02:57 -0800, Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@cruzio.com> >>>> wrote:

    On Sat, 1 Feb 2025 21:06:45 +0100, "Carlos E.R."
    <robin_listas@es.invalid> wrote:

    On 2025-02-01 06:19, Jeff Liebermann wrote:
    On Sat, 01 Feb 2025 00:28:24 +0000, Cursitor Doom <cd@notformail.com> >>>>>>> wrote:

    Wasn't it HP that was spying on customers by some ingenious yellow >>>>>>>> pixel scheme? Then made some excuse about catching forgers or some >>>>>>>> such claim.
    The yellow dots are for identifying the printer for tracking ransom >>>>>>> notes, forgeries, fake documents, currency, etc. The yellow dots are >>>>>>> why your printer runs out of yellow toner or ink before the other >>>>>>> toner colors. See:
    Are they still doing this? :-o
    As far as I know, and can determine from skimming various related web >>>>> sites, they're all doing it and have not added any way to turn it off. >>>>>
    <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Printer_tracking_dots>
    <https://www.instructables.com/Yellow-Dots-of-Mystery-Is-Your-Printer-Spying-on-/>

    Methinks this is where the "spying" story may have originated:
    "Tracking codes in photocopiers and colour laser printers"
    (Aug 11, 2007)
    <https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/E-6-2007-5724_EN.html> >>>>>>>
    If you want to see the yellow dots, you'll need a UV LED flashlight. I >>>>>>> had the not-so-bright idea of pouring some black toner into an old >>>>>>> yellow toner cartridge. The dots were easily visible with a
    magnifying glass. However, it took me about an hour to clean up the >>>>>>> transfer belt mechanism so that yellow would print normally. Not >>>>>>> recommended.
    I carefully examined printouts from my printer long ago, did not find >>>>>> anything.
    I examined some prints last night and also couldn't find any yellow
    dots. Brain function returned this morning when I realized that I was >>>>> looking at B&W prints from my monochrome laser printer. Yellow dots >>>>> require yellow toner. I'll try again, this time using my HP Color
    Laser Jet Pro MFP M477fnw printer.
    I found the yellow dots, but it wasn't easy. As usual, I did
    everything wrong the first time I tried it.

    1. Use a magnifier. I found that a folding jewelers 30x loupe, with
    a built in white LED, worked well. This what I used:
    <https://www.ebay.com/itm/116331398465>
    Both loupes were low quality, but the price was right. The UV light
    didn't do anything useful. I could try using one of my microscopes,
    but the kitchen table is currently occupied.

    2. Don't use paper with a rough or textured (linen, felt, laid, etc)
    surface. Try to find paper with a smooth surface. If it looks like
    the surface of the moon with a magnifier, find some other paper.

    3. Some articles suggest using UV illumination. I have a wide
    variety of UV lights in both LED and fluorescent in various
    wavelengths. However, yellow toner is not phosphorescent, so it must
    be the phosphors they add to paper to make them appear "bright". Sure >>>> enough, UV illumination worked best with 96 bright paper. I didn't
    have any 100 bright. However, UV illumination didn't improve
    visibility much.

    4. The tiny dots seem unevenly spread over the surface of the paper.
    You'll need to move the magnifying glass around the page to find the
    yellow dots. At 30x the depth of field is small. That means put the
    printed page on something flat.

    5. When I first started looking for the dots, I almost instantly saw
    them. About 1 minute later, the dots disappeared. What happened is
    that I had cataract surgery about 1 year ago. The problem was that it >>>> wasn't totally successful. As soon as I was able to rest my eyes a
    little, the dots re-appeared.

    6. I guessed that the designers did not include a feature where the
    dots moved around the page after each printed page. Therefore,
    over-printing the same page multiple times should improve visibility.
    Unfortunately, my laser printer has a registration problem causing the >>>> overprinted dots and text on the page to move. However, I have more
    dots to view. I found more barely visible yellow dots, but also a few >>>> very bright yellow dots.

    It's my understanding that the yellow dots also appear when "printing" >>>> to a file. I suspect that printing on dark paper will improve the
    contrast and make the yellow dots more visible. I would guess(tm)
    that a yellow filter might also help improve contrast. I haven't
    tried any of these (yet).

    Good luck.
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Printer_tracking_dots
    I already posted that link a few messages upstream. It doesn't say
    much about how to best view the dots. So, I went to YouTube (as
    suggested).

    Here's one that features your favorite microscope:
    "Yellow Dots of Mystery: Is Your Printer Spying on You?"
    <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sit6zUQKpJc>

    and one from EFF:
    "Yellow Dots of Mystery: Is Your Printer Spying on You?"
    <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=izMGMsIZK4U>

    As usual, I was doing it all wrong. I tried illuminating with UV, but
    should have used a blue LED and turned off the room lights.

    Dots all folks.

    I suspect Obamba's fake birth certificate has yellow dots on it.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Lizard Cheney@21:1/5 to micky on Tue Feb 4 11:02:58 2025
    XPost: sci.electronics.repair, alt.home.repair

    micky wrote:
    Please don't pollute a technical thread with political nonsense.
    Especially obsolete allegations, especially my thread.

    If you continue to do this, I won't include AHR in technical posts and
    you'll be an even bigger blight on AHR.


    In sci.electronics.repair, on Sun, 02 Feb 25 11:31:29 UTC, Lizard Cheney <lizard.cheney@j6.insurrection.dept> wrote:

    I suspect Obamba's fake birth certificate has yellow dots on it.

    Please don't top post. Top posting destroys the flow of the thread.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)