Neutral job as manager to good job as manager

AI at work fitbit or iwatch graphs the daily success of manager at getting the managed into a zone of comprehension and AI quantified likelihood of improved action; things like vocal tone and depth of responses support AI output and visualization graph.
If the previous day or week chart showed 2/3 functionality of management and new chart shows 4/5 functionality then the personal initiative the manager took to learn to communicate more effectively, or just apply what they already learned is measured as
having worked then the manager feels they are doing a good job, promoting goals and being in the graphed effective communications zone, so they feel good.



I read research that said employed people are happier. It is possible an AI work fitbit and more research could find out why. Perhaps it is keeping busy and occupied, perhaps it is polite person-affirming small talk, perhaps it has to do with being
normal at broader society. They could find out which, how much, and for what mbti or big 5 type, and have the work fitbit amplify that benefit, with enhanced task mix or even social lunches; this makes the job actually better than the previous version of
the job and also produces higher quantified happiness at the global measure where employment is associated with greater happiness, as well as from from a personal individual measured happiness standpoint.



A beneficial drug that causes neutral feeling work to be good; it is possible mbti J feel good and on their preferred organized scheduled motif when they stick to a diet or exercise regimen. These people might then also feel good if they take a longevity
pill on time. So, work that provides complimentary longevity pills could leverage J-ness to provide felt satisfaction. This compares to the S or P enjoying the free, spontaneous delicious food some employers provide. I think some Longevity pills, among
them metformin, also increase healthspan causing physically greater sustained energy as life progresses without stimulants. That causes a good job to feel good longer to the employee. This also benefits employers. This could be a non-medical drug
promotion at work social construct.



.5b year option on employment:option open alternate employers ; person applies for new job while already employed, they are approved for the new job. They could psychologically and materially benefit from being able to switch to the new job anytime that
year; the feeling of a ready option could cause greater sense of well being, security and happiness. This would also provide the existing employer with an incentive to promote workplace satisfaction, turning neutral jobs into good jobs. feminism benefits
with this as a new thing as equal pay for equal work is bolstered when a ready alternative to current earnings is available a full year at a time. AI human resources software could identify upper half productivity potential employees and give them full
year option employment; the numbers work as hiring these upper half people raises the group average productivity above the median.



Also, quite different than a social prescriptive, employers and staffing agencies only provide the year option when they have done a statistical calculation showing that the year option, with guaranteed placement earns money and/or saves money. A
staffing agency could guarantee 1099 jobs at the earnings level of the year option if the projected employer took off. They have done the numbers and perhaps know that less than 1℅ will be unprofitable as 1099 persons.



Interestingly China, with its people rating number, could encourage employers to give the year option to sufficient scorers; much better perhaps is to measure the individual freshly. "pre approved" jobs might then exist



.5b Educational software; a teacher writes comments and corrections on a student's paper. Does the student read it and improve? Sometimes, and more students reading the comments would benefit more people. To increase the number of students that read and
learn from the comments have educational software that has the student make a note or summary of the comment at a text box online or on the source document this new commenting with phone camera. No human teacher needs to look at the comment on their
comment but the software increases the effectiveness of the source comments on learning.

When the comment was "great!" The student could write a sentence about how they found the answer; this could beneficially allow them to bask longer in their praise, generating enthusiasm for the subject and schoolwork. extra credit possible from
commenting on the teachers comments.



Survey monkey/grammerly could do a non OCR version perhaps instantly and gather stats on the responses.



Command line educational software, type formulas to know more than mouse





Sharing and teaching reading look up " improve focus while learning to read"



Reading ideas

" I like the way you pay attention" when it occurs I notably like attentive students, the thing is, is there a "catch them doing something right" way to honestly use this. Actually it could benefit the good readers as well. It might heighten their
already good concentration as well as feel nice to hear.

How about "I like it when you pay attention like that." After a moment of successful concentration (Clayton)



Enzymatic production of CART peptides from food proteins, or some specialized feedstock protein might be possible; that makes them outside government regulation while still being effective drugs. CART peptides might be better-than-well concentration
increasers for children even those without ADD.



Suggest "your child has books! Here are great ways to share reading with them ...and visit the library for more!" minipapers at each give-away book. It might cause more parent child reading and is cheap.



Ethics of first things first or advance on all fronts simultaneously

Notably FTF can specify branched developable fronts early on or even as branches, first! Then, after branch development processing and prioritization it can address other things or even recalibrate based on the effects from addressing the prioritized
branch' plurality first or early on.



When you think of a computer architecture (quasi metaphorical as I am thinking about actual human ethics) FTF and AFS have the potential to look really different. The 1,1,0 automata is Turing complete; if you think of that 1,1,0 thing running parallel (
like an automata then that graphically might look like a bunch of trees at a dendritic polymer) on a AFS while a FTF could possibly be more efficient at high velocities and a near serial architecture; then again an early priority for FTF could be
optimizing the ethical landscape for high parallelism of action while still having first things first.



Looking at it like a computer then the kind of actual thing it, the ethics, runs on could be modified. Human body, matter, consciousness, could be adjusted to rapidly solve ethics.



With FTF who or what perceives the priorities? Is AFS being kind of medianish stochastic less efficient than parallel optimized FTF?



So then ethically, what is the optimal architecture or way to run that is metaphorically compute ethics and actual human actions on what kind of mechanism?



Modifying or customizing the mechanism, like serial, parallel, quantum computing, that runs FTF or AFS could cause ultra high ethical well being many orders of magnitude more rapidly.



One approach is genetic engineering of human beings; another might be fiduciary and/or high signal to noise action linkages where people are strongly guided by computers; do that possibly with finding something actually benevolent and person enhancing
with greater utility than the ethics of beguilement(advertisingish) or token value systems (although having libertarian tendencies i note token systems, possibly including money, which has recently gotten better, (bitcoin) preclude some harm while
providing discernable rewards) at producing with humans behavior near to or the same as the model's response at a computer simulation. Thinking of nice action causers, What might be functional though is artificial love, like measurably good feeling
harmonizing around shared behaviors, possibly with girlfriend (robot girlfriend) or biological imprinting-like trust. Voluntary behavioral psychology positive reinforcement environments could also shift behavior towards an algorithmically mathematically
valid ethics.



It is likely there are other near fiduciary response to a computed ethics technologies. Self help books about actualizing change exist. A person could think about that though.



Also, what about the lived ethics, or computed ethics of retrocausal modification? (What i think JY said he was doing) when you modify the past with FTF there is a possibility of having a version of FTF from the retrocausalists (only partially globally
system aware) proclivities. To the rightmost branch of AFS everything looks like a dove







calculation asymmetry; retrocausal electron computer

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

Neutral job as manager to good job as manager
AI at work fitbit or iwatch graphs the daily success of manager at getting the managed into a zone of comprehension and AI quantified likelihood of improved action; things like vocal tone and depth of responses support AI output and visualization graph.
If the previous day or week chart showed 2/3 functionality of management and new chart shows 4/5 functionality then the personal initiative the manager took to learn to communicate more effectively, or just apply what they already learned is measured as
having worked then the manager feels they are doing a good job, promoting goals and being in the graphed effective communications zone, so they feel good.

I read research that said employed people are happier. It is possible an AI work fitbit and more research could find out why. Perhaps it is keeping busy and occupied, perhaps it is polite person-affirming small talk, perhaps it has to do with being
normal at broader society. They could find out which, how much, and for what mbti or big 5 type, and have the work fitbit amplify that benefit, with enhanced task mix or even social lunches; this makes the job actually better than the previous version of
the job and also produces higher quantified happiness at the global measure where employment is associated with greater happiness, as well as from from a personal individual measured happiness standpoint.

A beneficial drug that causes neutral feeling work to be good; it is possible mbti J feel good and on their preferred organized scheduled motif when they stick to a diet or exercise regimen. These people might then also feel good if they take a longevity
pill on time. So, work that provides complimentary longevity pills could leverage J-ness to provide felt satisfaction. This compares to the S or P enjoying the free, spontaneous delicious food some employers provide. I think some Longevity pills, among
them metformin, also increase healthspan causing physically greater sustained energy as life progresses without stimulants. That causes a good job to feel good longer to the employee. This also benefits employers. This could be a non-medical drug
promotion at work social construct.

.5b year option on employment:option open alternate employers ; person applies for new job while already employed, they are approved for the new job. They could psychologically and materially benefit from being able to switch to the new job anytime that
year; the feeling of a ready option could cause greater sense of well being, security and happiness. This would also provide the existing employer with an incentive to promote workplace satisfaction, turning neutral jobs into good jobs. feminism benefits
with this as a new thing as equal pay for equal work is bolstered when a ready alternative to current earnings is available a full year at a time. AI human resources software could identify upper half productivity potential employees and give them full
year option employment; the numbers work as hiring these upper half people raises the group average productivity above the median.

Also, quite different than a social prescriptive, employers and staffing agencies only provide the year option when they have done a statistical calculation showing that the year option, with guaranteed placement earns money and/or saves money. A
staffing agency could guarantee 1099 jobs at the earnings level of the year option if the projected employer took off. They have done the numbers and perhaps know that less than 1℅ will be unprofitable as 1099 persons.

Interestingly China, with its people rating number, could encourage employers to give the year option to sufficient scorers; much better perhaps is to measure the individual freshly. "pre approved" jobs might then exist

.5b Educational software; a teacher writes comments and corrections on a student's paper. Does the student read it and improve? Sometimes, and more students reading the comments would benefit more people. To increase the number of students that read and
learn from the comments have educational software that has the student make a note or summary of the comment at a text box online or on the source document this new commenting with phone camera. No human teacher needs to look at the comment on their
comment but the software increases the effectiveness of the source comments on learning.
When the comment was "great!" The student could write a sentence about how they found the answer; this could beneficially allow them to bask longer in their praise, generating enthusiasm for the subject and schoolwork. extra credit possible from
commenting on the teachers comments.

Survey monkey/grammerly could do a non OCR version perhaps instantly and gather stats on the responses.

Command line educational software, type formulas to know more than mouse


Sharing and teaching reading look up " improve focus while learning to read"

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)