Noting "triple bottom line" or any multi good summary, could complex numbers be a bigger part of business and ethics; graph of 3i+3 intersection with y^3+I

That makes it so an ethicist or regular person can graphically compare a benevolent emoter with a productive beneficial scientist



vaguely, is it better to advance on all fronts simultaneously or to do first things first? (Rescue a child first or file a vaccine patent) Computer science might suggest multifoliate leaves of simultaneity on some branches sorted on preeminence, so if
the utility is positive (create, feel) or negative utilitarianism (rescue, ensure) then CS seems to suggest particularized combination of advance on fronts with first things first. CS upgrades though; quantum computers, as I perceive them, advance on all
fronts.



Possible FEA voxels: is FEA of sets with verbs, more or less ethical? Whatever size chunks that you have the mind or computer to calculate affects their ethical depth; FEA: Having your sunscreen rejuvenate your skin while rescuing a child and
simultaneously getting a vaccine patent seems sunscreenish trivial but noting math, FEA, and the effect of 3% growth compounded suggest that aggregations of micro benefit could have large volumes of value. This suggests that good things can happen even
without a sentience being aware; a decisionless benefit.

Noting FEA Voxels produce a geometry of ethical chunks sortalike user-adjustable directional stress tests also can produce emergent godelescherbach cube simultaneous objects with 3 projections



CS approaches to ethics; advance on all fronts simultaneously(AFS) or first things first(FTF); different effects on hope and optimism; genetically engineered to be optimistic an FTF mileau person might not care optimizing their teen romance could not
happen before age14. An AFS person has the benefit of a different improvement front making teen tinder. Without optimism or cheer FTF could produce a subtype of nonoptimality: (long waitlist emotion effects) unless the person was biologically always
feeling good; the optimality of course is that the most important thing gets accomplished.



possible efficiency: a two or more pass math CS function that scans the list (or math space) of things to do then finds new substitutes for what would otherwise be redressive actions: Then the new list is shorter and more rapidly effectively doable. It
is very possible that more than two passes of the substitutor/agglomerator would optimize a first things first list.



AFS causes longevity pills and robots while the living conditions among humans vary, rather than a durable nicely furnished precivilization hut with lots of food and a loving mate for every person; noting one effect of AFS is billions of people that are
very happy and live millennia or longer.



From an advance on all fronts perspective FEA at a resolution more minute than human awareness could model all the benefits at once, then big-voxel or parsimoniousize some of the FEA ethics spaces to create more efficient attainment of benefit
computations even while doing everything at once



Genetically engineering all people to be good at math they would then be able to talk, act upon, and compare their actual living ethics with math; this is beneficial



Sharing and teaching reading



Cultivate informed directional choice so as to practice "news you can use" filtering. Have Zara and other students pick out a book for "looks like most fun", reminds me of me, prettiest images; then have them pick from their new list. Supposedly this
practices discernment, purpose, and knowing they can seek a kind of benefit on purpose; then postschool they can interrupt their social media to read consumer reports



Ask Zara, " would you like to babysit? What would you do?"

Study if people who babysit make better happier parents or is no effect; if beneficial promote voluntary babysitting by 20somethings for the experience rather than the money; this benefits moms and the 20something babysitters might be extra enriching to
children.



Look up babysitting on pub med



It might cultivate liking books and reading from asking Clayton, Zara and other students "what would make this book more fun?" Would it be more fun on an airplane? Possibly improvise the new preferred version.



I could start saying hello to people on the street. They will usually like it.

Greeting women recognizes them.



Measure psychological well being of children with 1,2 or 3 friendship based play dates a week; find out if there is an optimal amount of friendship parents can purposefully cultivate for their children; they could measure stuff like empathy, beneficial
speaking up/boldness, happiness (even on the non-playdate days)

This research supports the children's well being directly but also practices their good person social skills for when they are older and have children of their own.



Is there an ethical way to teach children to be nicer to their parents; that would then non consciously cause the parents to be even nicer to the children; scheduled non-goodnight hugs and teaching the child to say the parent's name rather than "mom"
goes well with Dale Carnegie. Kids taking Fish oil modifies their behavior and then parents were measurably better at being harmless to their children and each other.

A beneficial new drug the child could take that has a benevolence and utility increasing effect on the parents; Possibly the amino acid taurine which removes tiredness (one study) could be beneficially given to children (and parents).

It is possible that mbti sorted parents might, as groups, benefit from similar actual doables. It could work, even if it was on purpose, to have three sentences written on an index card that the child says to her parents; a little like fill in the blank,
"I love you even more than ______", " thanks for looking at my schoolwork tonight", "what's the best thing that happened to you today?" Although these are staged conversations the minds of the parents might absorb the affectionate and beneficial
messages along with frequent actual good discussions



Perhaps 9-11am weekends is peak alertness for parents and children simultaneously, sort of; more research; then schedule learning and togetherness activities then. Higher willingness and responsiveness from children meet peak productivity office hours.
Parents that schedule this way might get single or double digit gains in their kids perceived interest and friendliness thus making the parents feel good(so they treat their children even better).





Sharing and teaching reading;

written previously: possibly making word lists of words new from last week could be beneficial, also pick out three new words to learn like "Monday" or "these" and bring them up again next session. Bring paper to the classroom.



Suggest the children have what is likely fun reading words that spontaneously occur from a car view. If they don't know the word they can recognize the letters and say first or all letters at "yield" or "mall".



Look up math analysis online



Customize honest praise more than saying good or right; John might then hear, " I like the way you repeat the word right after I read it"



While they are reading most of the text, suggest Gage say the word after I supplementally read it, also Zara



It might work and thus double practice, "have your parent read this to you again tonight!" "You'll be extra good reading this to your parent because we already practiced!" Gage might do well with this, he likes his family a lot.



Find lively books for Clayton Dr Seuss rhyming poems might be lively enough to maintain attention while making books and reading actively fun. Practice saying the letters of words so he knows all the letter shapes. dbp etc.



Mention most beneficial child parent ideas to Shay Stacer like teaching/positioning/medicating (taurine)/staging child produced content that makes the parent feel good and emotionally connected to their children, even though it is prompted, thus they
become even nicer to their children



How big would the detector have to be to measure the entire universal wave function? Is it littler than a universe? Could it be one durable particle responding to gravity? Which brings up how high a resolution is necessary to make an observation "gravity,
from all directions, yep. That one particle tells it like it is" Might be less than sufficient. So what is a shannon information theory minimum to make an UWF observation; if it were a p value it would be eight things.



The detector that can measure the entire universal wave function, regardless of size might be easier to construct or more math and logic parsimonious than unitary MWI; to some people, but not others, that looks better. Could building a detector capable
of observing the entire universal wave function obviate future multiverses? No need for branching when you've got it observed. The thing is JY was able to describe alternate versions of Earth's history (he said there are some without the internet), so JY
data might align with the multiverse.



Just for amusement, what about the parts of the universe that are beyond the light cone of the alleged big bang; are they a boundary between entirely different MWI universe sized wave functions? Hint: quantum entangled photons communicate at least 10,000
times faster than light travels so that portion of overlapping space with .000001% naturally occurring quantum entangled photons would have a huge volume overlap or expansion of the MWI area.



If there is a buildable detector for the entire universal wave function? could the MWI come up with varied universes where it was either working or turned off? That might cause a growth MWI branch and a branchless determined universe. Which is better to
live in? Have nonhuman observers already observed and made the universe that humans live at as wave function specific branch determined?



Could people tell if the entire universal wave function has been previously observed; some approach to verifying or refuting that preobservation could verify or refute or verify the MWI What would act different in a preobserved universe; its remotely
possible that the crust of Newtonian deterministic physics comes from some universal resolution of some possibly big quantum thing. So building a universal wave function (UWF). detector, then detecting the UWF, could be measured as to whether it extended
newtonianism to some previously unnewtownian area; building the detector would change physics.



Just for fun, noting there are different sizes of infinities (aleph numbers) could a quantum event detector/MWI branchmaker be constructed that operated at a different higher aleph number of infinities? I may have read that something squared is aleph two
compared with all the integers which might be aleph one; so can you use a photon or radiation detector squared some way to hypermultiply the MWI infinity? Although the MWI might address time sequence, do pulsed lasers or standing waves alephtwoize even
though they are chrono effects



Does using that detector cause variation (wobble) at things, among them the casimir effect from some kind of physics thing? Is there a new geometry packing effect, because the technologist made an aleph two detector squared that causes multiverse to pack
together differently? is there some way to measure or mathematically predict some anisotropy that could be measured differently from both before and after the aleph two branch apparatus; this way produces three observations to detect the MWI?



Lunch might be about a tenth of the workday. Things that improve the moments known as lunchtime could have value.

Do people feel good when they share food? More the sharer or the consumer? Does it work better or the same with volume? Like a cookie from a package compared with an entire slice of pizza. Also could be mapped with myers Briggs or big five. Esf might
like the talking, the flavor, and the possible emotionally inclusive gesture. In Australia this is the most frequent myers Briggs type for women



Study the effects of music at lunch also the cashier greeting lift effect

Could robots provide even more of an emotional lift than a human cashier better eye contact and hand touch



perhaps a quantitatively measured as having greater lift greeting than how are you

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)