• Japs can't pronounce L's (the Japanese convert L's into R's)

    From HenHanna@21:1/5 to All on Fri Jun 28 20:17:30 2024
    XPost: alt.usage.english

    Does anyone (with knowledge of phonetics, phonology)
    care to comment on how the Anglo-American views about

    Japs can't pronounce L's (the Japanese convert L's into R's)

    have changed in the last 30 years or so?


    Among those who know linguistics, and the lay public? Any changes?


    Among US-youths, the level of general interest (in the Jp lang)
    has changed greatly, because of Anime and Jpop (City pop).

    i'm hearing that fewer Americans are studying Chinese now.
    How about Japanese, Korean?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ruud Harmsen@21:1/5 to All on Sat Jun 29 12:25:46 2024
    XPost: alt.usage.english

    Fri, 28 Jun 2024 20:17:30 -0700: HenHanna <HenHanna@devnull.tb>
    scribeva:


    Does anyone (with knowledge of phonetics, phonology)
    care to comment on how the Anglo-American views about

    Japs can't pronounce L's (the Japanese convert L's into R's)

    have changed in the last 30 years or so?


    Among those who know linguistics, and the lay public? Any changes?


    Among US-youths, the level of general interest (in the Jp lang)
    has changed greatly, because of Anime and Jpop (City pop).

    i'm hearing that fewer Americans are studying Chinese now.
    How about Japanese, Korean?

    See Wikipedia, it has a fine article about Japanese phonology, with
    lots and lots of details. There is no separate r and l in Japanese,
    they are allophones of a single phoneme.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tilde@21:1/5 to HenHanna on Sat Jun 29 22:19:36 2024
    XPost: alt.usage.english

    HenHanna wrote:

    Does anyone (with knowledge of phonetics, phonology)
        care to comment on how the Anglo-American views about

              Japs can't pronounce L's   (the Japanese convert L's into R's)

    "japs" ????? really?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From J. J. Lodder@21:1/5 to Tilde on Sun Jun 30 11:18:44 2024
    XPost: alt.usage.english

    Tilde <invalide@invalid.invalid> wrote:

    HenHanna wrote:

    Does anyone (with knowledge of phonetics, phonology)
    care to comment on how the Anglo-American views about

    Japs can't pronounce L's (the Japanese convert L's into R's)

    "japs" ????? really?

    It seems so. It may be a clue to the Hen being Dutch.

    In circles of descendants of the white Dutch from Indonesia
    'Jap' is routinely used as a denigrating and racist term.
    The Japanese consider the use of 'Jap' for them as insulting,
    but those people either don't want to know that, or do it deliberately.

    The fact that their kind of white suprematist [1]
    was deeply humiliated by the Japanese during WWIIy rankled,
    and some of them never got over it.
    Some of their children and grandchildren have inherited the outlook.

    Also in the use of 'Jappenkamp',
    for the internment camps for women and children in Indonesia.

    All this has been a cause of controversy:
    some less narrowminded authors with colonial roots
    have protested vehemently against this narrow-minded outlook.

    All just a possibility of course.
    So directly for the Hen: are you Dutch?

    Jan


    [1] For comparison: The Dutch in Indonesia were in general more racist
    and exclusive that the British in their India,
    and in consequence made a far greater mess of it after WWII.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From bertietaylor@21:1/5 to All on Sun Jun 30 12:41:00 2024
    XPost: alt.usage.english

    Amazing lot, going to the ends of the Earth to grab whatever they could. Active!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From HenHanna@21:1/5 to J. J. Lodder on Sun Jun 30 13:33:21 2024
    XPost: alt.usage.english

    On 6/30/2024 2:18 AM, J. J. Lodder wrote:
    Tilde <invalide@invalid.invalid> wrote:

    HenHanna wrote:

    Does anyone (with knowledge of phonetics, phonology)
    care to comment on how the Anglo-American views about

    Japs can't pronounce L's (the Japanese convert L's into R's) >>
    "japs" ????? really?

    It seems so. It may be a clue to the Hen being Dutch.

    In circles of descendants of the white Dutch from Indonesia
    'Jap' is routinely used as a denigrating and racist term.
    The Japanese consider the use of 'Jap' for them as insulting,
    but those people either don't want to know that, or do it deliberately.

    The fact that their kind of white suprematist [1]
    was deeply humiliated by the Japanese during WWIIy rankled,
    and some of them never got over it.
    Some of their children and grandchildren have inherited the outlook.

    Also in the use of 'Jappenkamp',
    for the internment camps for women and children in Indonesia.

    All this has been a cause of controversy:
    some less narrowminded authors with colonial roots
    have protested vehemently against this narrow-minded outlook.

    All just a possibility of course.
    So directly for the Hen: are you Dutch?

    Jan


    [1] For comparison: The Dutch in Indonesia were in general more racist
    and exclusive that the British in their India,
    and in consequence made a far greater mess of it after WWII.



    Jul 21, 2004 — BEAUMONT, Texas (Reuters) - A decade-long
    fight over a quiet country lane called "Jap Road" ended on Monday when
    local officials voted to change ...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From J. J. Lodder@21:1/5 to bertietaylor on Thu Jul 4 22:28:59 2024
    XPost: alt.usage.english

    bertietaylor <bertietaylor@novabbs.com.invalid> wrote:

    [on the Dutch]
    Amazing lot, going to the ends of the Earth to grab whatever they could. Active!

    As far as Nagasaki, anyway.
    The Dutch didn't grab anything there, they traded.
    They were succesful in that, precisely because
    they did not try to grab anything.
    (that's what the Spanish and the Portugese were kicked out for)

    The Dutch also brought them books, [1]
    which the Japanese translated as well as they could.
    (with Dutch help)

    In consequence many Japanese technical and scientific terms
    have Dutch origins.
    (or they are from other European languages, through Dutch)

    Jan

    [1] Foreign books were banned completely to begin with,
    but they were tolerated later on,
    when not containing any christianity.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From HenHanna@21:1/5 to Ross Clark on Thu Jul 4 14:42:38 2024
    XPost: alt.usage.english

    On 7/4/2024 2:24 PM, Ross Clark wrote:
    On 5/07/2024 8:29 a.m., J. J. Lodder wrote:
    Mike Spencer <mds@bogus.nodomain.nowhere> wrote:

    nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) writes:

    Whoever, it is a good usage point to remember that 'Jap',
    no matter how used, is considered to be denigrating and insulting
    by the Japanese. Even as Jap., in well-meaning abbreviations.

    So best advice is to avoid it under all circumstances,

    Interesting to note that Neal Stephenson, in _Cryptonomicon_, has
    USain characters, marines actively engaged in WWII in the Pacific
    theater who consistently refer to their foes as "Nips".

    The only occasion of "Jap" usage is by a Colonel at Marine Barracks
    in DC when interviewing a seargeant recently returned form active
    combat duty in the Pacific.  A footnote says,

         Men with experience in Asia use the term "Nip".  The Colonel's use
         of "Jap" suggests that his career has been spent in the Atlantic >>>      and/or Caribbean.

    P. 114 in the original hardcover ed. if anyone cares.

    There a a few other uses of 'Jap' in the book,
    outnumbered by the use of 'Nips'.
    The author also uses 'Nipponese' a lot.
    But then the 'Yanks also outnumber the Americans.

    During wars, many people may use denigrating slang
    to refer to their enemies.
    It is also common that after those wars have been over for some time,
    using the same denigrating terms gets frowned upon.
    It gets to be regarded as uncivilised behaviour.
    Like refering to Hirohito, on a state visit to the Netherlands,
    as 'that Jap'. (1971)

    Some groups however suffer from deep frustrations,
    and go on with it forever.
    It becomes just a symptom,

    Jan



    by [symptom] -- you mean like a disease
    or a (psych.) disorder?



    "Nippon" is the way they say it in Japanese (nowadays more commonly
    "Nihon"). The J- versions have come to the west via Chinese (cf. Marco
    Polo's "Zipangu"). Perhaps that is part of what the Japanese don't like
    about them.

    This all brought back a phrase which lodged in my mind years ago. My
    sister was reading "Three Came Home", Agnes Newton Keith's memoir of her experiences in a Japanese internment camp in North Borneo, 1942-45. The internees were allowed to write letters to family, but they were
    required to refer to their captors as "the friendly Nipponese".



    that's pretty interesting.

    When Brits were beginning to trade in China...

    there was a certain character that the Chinese like to
    use for Westerners... (whch they resented so much that....)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Peter Moylan@21:1/5 to J. J. Lodder on Fri Jul 5 11:19:57 2024
    XPost: alt.usage.english

    On 05/07/24 06:28, J. J. Lodder wrote:
    bertietaylor <bertietaylor@novabbs.com.invalid> wrote:

    [on the Dutch]
    Amazing lot, going to the ends of the Earth to grab whatever they could.
    Active!

    As far as Nagasaki, anyway.
    The Dutch didn't grab anything there, they traded.
    They were succesful in that, precisely because
    they did not try to grab anything.
    (that's what the Spanish and the Portugese were kicked out for)

    That was part of the reason. Another important part was that the Spanish
    and Portuguese tried to convert people to Christianity.

    One bit of information that the Dutch brought to Japan was the fact that
    there was more than one Christian religion, and that the Christians did
    not agree amongst themselves on religious questions.

    (In the long term, the accumulation of more and more religions is a path
    to atheism.)

    --
    Peter Moylan peter@pmoylan.org http://www.pmoylan.org
    Newcastle, NSW

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From J. J. Lodder@21:1/5 to Peter Moylan on Fri Jul 5 12:52:02 2024
    XPost: alt.usage.english

    Peter Moylan <peter@pmoylan.org> wrote:

    On 05/07/24 06:28, J. J. Lodder wrote:
    bertietaylor <bertietaylor@novabbs.com.invalid> wrote:

    [on the Dutch]
    Amazing lot, going to the ends of the Earth to grab whatever they could. >> Active!

    As far as Nagasaki, anyway.
    The Dutch didn't grab anything there, they traded.
    They were succesful in that, precisely because
    they did not try to grab anything.
    (that's what the Spanish and the Portugese were kicked out for)

    That was part of the reason. Another important part was that the Spanish
    and Portuguese tried to convert people to Christianity.

    Worse than that, those they had converted participated
    in the civil wars. (on the wrong side)

    One bit of information that the Dutch brought to Japan was the fact that there was more than one Christian religion, and that the Christians did
    not agree amongst themselves on religious questions.

    The Dutch did something worse than that:
    They showed the Shogun a copy of the Treaty of Tordesillas,
    and asked a Jesuit who was present to translate it into Japanese.
    The Shogun was not at all pleased to learn
    that most of his country belonged to the king of Portugal,
    by a Spanish/Portugese treaty. [1]

    Jan

    [1] The dividing line passes through northern Japan.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Sam Plusnet@21:1/5 to Peter Moylan on Fri Jul 5 18:58:35 2024
    XPost: alt.usage.english

    On 05/07/2024 02:19, Peter Moylan wrote:
    On 05/07/24 06:28, J. J. Lodder wrote:
    bertietaylor <bertietaylor@novabbs.com.invalid> wrote:

    [on the Dutch]
    Amazing lot, going to the ends of the Earth to grab whatever they could. >>> Active!
    yncrati
    As far as Nagasaki, anyway.
    The Dutch didn't grab anything there, they traded.
    They were succesful in that, precisely because
    they did not try to grab anything.
    (that's what the Spanish and the Portugese were kicked out for)

    That was part of the reason. Another important part was that the Spanish
    and Portuguese tried to convert people to Christianity.

    One bit of information that the Dutch brought to Japan was the fact that there was more than one Christian religion, and that the Christians did
    not agree amongst themselves on religious questions.

    (In the long term, the accumulation of more and more religions is a path
    to atheism.)

    Interesting idea.
    The Romans accumulated lots and lots of religions as they expanded their
    emipre - but they took a syncretic approach to it.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tilde@21:1/5 to Peter Moylan on Sat Jul 6 22:48:24 2024
    XPost: alt.usage.english

    Peter Moylan wrote:
    On 05/07/24 06:28, J. J. Lodder wrote:
    bertietaylor <bertietaylor@novabbs.com.invalid> wrote:

    [on the Dutch]
    Amazing lot, going to the ends of the Earth to grab whatever they could. >>> Active!

    As far as Nagasaki, anyway.
    The Dutch didn't grab anything there, they traded.
    They were succesful in that, precisely because
    they did not try to grab anything.
    (that's what the Spanish and the Portugese were kicked out for)

    That was part of the reason. Another important part was that the Spanish
    and Portuguese tried to convert people to Christianity.

    One bit of information that the Dutch brought to Japan was the fact that there was more than one Christian religion, and that the Christians did
    not agree amongst themselves on religious questions.

    (In the long term, the accumulation of more and more religions is a path
    to atheism.)


    Recently read "A Jesuit in the Forbidden City:
    Matteo Ricci, 1552-1610". Worth plowing through.
    From the book and the wiki page on him, it
    appears that China kept things pretty well
    contained:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matteo_Ricci
    "At the time, Christian missionary activity
    in China was almost completely limited to
    Macau..."

    Ricci did an amazing amount of work learning
    Chinese, both speaking and reading:

    "Once in Macau, Ricci studied the Chinese
    language and customs. It was the beginning
    of a long project that made him one of the
    first Western scholars to master Chinese
    script and Classical Chinese. "

    Not much mention of Ricci in this group
    from what I see in google.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From J. J. Lodder@21:1/5 to Tilde on Sun Jul 7 11:50:54 2024
    XPost: alt.usage.english

    Tilde <invalide@invalid.invalid> wrote:

    Peter Moylan wrote:
    On 05/07/24 06:28, J. J. Lodder wrote:
    bertietaylor <bertietaylor@novabbs.com.invalid> wrote:

    [on the Dutch]
    Amazing lot, going to the ends of the Earth to grab whatever they could. >>> Active!

    As far as Nagasaki, anyway.
    The Dutch didn't grab anything there, they traded.
    They were succesful in that, precisely because
    they did not try to grab anything.
    (that's what the Spanish and the Portugese were kicked out for)

    That was part of the reason. Another important part was that the Spanish and Portuguese tried to convert people to Christianity.

    One bit of information that the Dutch brought to Japan was the fact that there was more than one Christian religion, and that the Christians did
    not agree amongst themselves on religious questions.

    (In the long term, the accumulation of more and more religions is a path
    to atheism.)


    Recently read "A Jesuit in the Forbidden City:
    Matteo Ricci, 1552-1610". Worth plowing through.
    From the book and the wiki page on him, it
    appears that China kept things pretty well
    contained:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matteo_Ricci
    "At the time, Christian missionary activity
    in China was almost completely limited to
    Macau..."

    Ricci did an amazing amount of work learning
    Chinese, both speaking and reading:

    "Once in Macau, Ricci studied the Chinese
    language and customs. It was the beginning
    of a long project that made him one of the
    first Western scholars to master Chinese
    script and Classical Chinese. "

    Not much mention of Ricci in this group
    from what I see in google.

    OTOH Ferdinand Verbiest has been mentioned here some time ago. <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ferdinand_Verbiest>

    Verbiest was a Jesuit astronomer and missionary of Belgian origin
    who succeeded in surviving at the Chinese court
    by being the superior astronomer in a contest of prediction
    against the Chinese court astronomer.

    He brought Copernican astronomy to China.
    Those Jesuits didn't care about papal bans on it.
    The bronze instruments he had cast still survive
    in Beijing centre, on what was once the city wall.

    Jan

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)