• Dan went to work (10/12/1977)

    From Stefan Ram@21:1/5 to All on Mon Dec 9 11:16:42 2024
    On December 10, 1977, Daniel L. Everett went to work with the
    Pirahã people.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From HenHanna@21:1/5 to Stefan Ram on Mon Dec 9 18:25:16 2024
    XPost: alt.usage.english, alt.english.usage

    On Mon, 9 Dec 2024 11:16:42 +0000, Stefan Ram wrote:

    On December 10, 1977, Daniel L. Everett went to work with the
    Pirahã people.



    Did anyone watch the 90 min (?) documentary about Chomsky that
    came out about 10 years ago? ------- (it was lame)



    (i liked the film [Manufacturing Consent]) Around that time, i went
    to a talk by him.



    The book by Tom Wolfe was good... Half of the book was on Chomsky.
    ------- his early years, His rise to fame.


    the other half of the book is on Daniel L. Everett

    _______________________


    Daniel L. Everett is known for his work on the Pirahã people
    of the Amazon, where he challenges aspects of linguistic theory,
    particularly Noam Chomsky's idea of universal grammar.

    He argues that language is profoundly shaped by culture and environment, suggesting that the Pirahã language lacks certain features
    common in other languages, such as fixed words for numbers and tenses.

    Everett's assertions emphasize the diversity of human
    experience and cognition, suggesting that there is no single model of
    language that applies universally.

    __________________________

    Tom Wolfe's book, *The Kingdom of Speech*, explores the debate surrounding language and its origins, particularly engaging with the
    ideas of Noam Chomsky and Daniel L. Everett.

    Many readers find it thought-provoking and accessible, as Wolfe combines narrative nonfiction with his signature style.

    __________________________


    Yes, some linguists have criticized The Kingdom of Speech for
    its portrayal of linguistic theory and its simplification of complex
    debates.

    Critics argue that Wolfe sometimes misrepresents Chomsky's work
    and the broader field of linguistics.

    While the book is praised for its engaging narrative and storytelling,
    many professionals in linguistics feel it lacks depth and accuracy in discussing the intricacies of language development and theory.

    As a result, the reception among linguists has been mixed, with some appreciating its cultural commentary while others take issue with its
    scholarly rigor.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)