Hi,

But just proclaiming we do dual processing
possibly leads to nowhere. We need a
Bee Clock Model of the brain.

Why do we have REM (Rapid Eye Movement)
phases when we sleep. We should have
a cognitive architecture, which has a model

of how the brain operates:

1) The hour we wake up
2) The hour we eat brakefast
3) The hour we brush our teeth
4) The hour we commute to work
5) The hour we do paper work
6) The hour we take a break at work
7) The hour we do phone work
8) The hour we have lunch at work
Etc..

A lot is going on in each hour. Different
cognitive functions are performed invidually
and socially. An artificial intelligence prossibly

needs a same routine somehow.

Bye

Mild Shock schrieb:

Hi,

Next issue 2:1 scheduled for January 2025 https://www.iospress.com/catalog/journals/neurosymbolic-artificial-intelligence

What is Neuro-Symbolic AI? https://allegrograph.com/what-is-neuro-symbolic-ai/

Connectionists methods combined with symbolic
methods? BTW: Not something new really, but
nevertheless, the current times might ask for
more interdisciplinary work.

The article by Ron Sun, Dual-process theories,
cognitive architectures, and hybrid neural-
symbolic models, even admits it:

"This idea immediately harkens back to the 1990s
when hybrid models first emerged [..] Besides
being termed neural-symbolic or neurosymbolic models,
they have also been variously known as connectionist
symbolic model, hybrid symbolic neural networks,
or simply hybrid models or systems.

I argued back then and am still arguing today [..]
. In particular, within the human mental architecture,
we need to take into account dual processes (e.g.,
as has been variously termed as implicit versus explicit,
unconscious versus conscious, intuition versus reason,
System 1 versus System 2, and so on, albeit sometimes
with somewhat different connotations). Incidentally,
dual-process (or two-system) theories have become quite
popular lately."

Ok I will take a nap, and let my automatic
processing do the disgesting of what he wrote.

LoL

Mild Shock schrieb:

Just reading:

"Deep ecologists reject any mechanical
or computer model of nature, and see
the Earth as a living organism, which
should be treated and understood accordingly"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deep_ecology#Sources

Now that we enter the age of AI. What
about an AI Computer model. An AI Earth
Computer model? Any pointers?

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)