Hi,
Chatgpt is definitely unreliable.
So is stackoverflow, you have no guarantee
to get a realiable answer. Sometimes they
have even biased nonsense, due to the over
representation of certain communities on
stackoverflow. But ChatGPT it is easier to
re-iterate a problem and explore solutions,
you don't get punished for sloppy questions,
or changing topic midflight exploring corner
digging deeper and deeper.
ChatGPT certainly beats stackoverflow.
Also stackoverflow is extremly hysteric about
keeping every comment trail, and has a very
slow garbage collection. I think stackoveflow
automatically deletes a answer with negative
votes after a while. On the other hand ChatGPT
keeps a side bar with all the interactions,
and you can delete an interaction any time
you want to do so. There is no maniac idea to
keep interactions. Stackoverflow possibly
only keeps this interactions to be able to
send people to their virtual prison. Basically
they have become a perverted para-governemental
institution that exercises violence.
Mild Shock schrieb:
Hi,
Lets say I have to chose between pig wrestle with a
grammar nazi stackoverflow user with 100k reputation, or
to interact with ChatGPT that puts a lot of
effort to understand the least cue I give, isn't
shot in to english only, you can also use it with
german, turkish, etc.. what ever.
Who do I use as a programming companion, stackoverflow
or ChatGPT. I think ChatGPT is the clear winner,
it doesn't feature the abomination of a virtual
prison like stackoverflow. Or as Cycorp, Inc has put
it already decades ago:
Common Sense Reasoning – From Cyc to Intelligent Assistant
Doug Lenat et al. - August 2006
2 The Case for an Ambient Research Assistant
2.3 Components of a Truly Intelligent Computational Assistant
Natural Language:
An assistant system must be able to remember
questions, statements, etc. from the user, and
what its own response was, in order to understand
the kinds of language ‘shortcuts’ people normally use
in context.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/226813714
Bye
Mild Shock schrieb:
Thats a funny quote:
"Once you have a truly massive amount of information
integrated as knowledge, then the human-software
system will be superhuman, in the same sense that
mankind with writing is superhuman compared to
mankind before writing."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Douglas_Lenat#Quotes
Mild Shock schrieb:
Just reading:
"Deep ecologists reject any mechanical
or computer model of nature, and see
the Earth as a living organism, which
should be treated and understood accordingly"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deep_ecology#Sources
Now that we enter the age of AI. What
about an AI Computer model. An AI Earth
Computer model? Any pointers?
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)