Thomas Heger wrote:Most likely a few specialists exist in Germany, who actually know.
Actually you can read the annotations now online (without downloading
the file).
nonsense, that's completely bullshit. It displays you never been study
at an university with a ๐๐ถ๐๐ถ๐๐ถ๐ป๐ด_๐ฝ๐ฟ๐ผ๐ณ๐ฒ๐๐๐ผ๐ฟ.
Am 12.11.2023 um 19:17 schrieb Frauly Bagaryatsky:
Thomas Heger wrote:Most likely a few specialists exist in Germany, who actually know.
Actually you can read the annotations now online (without
downloading the file).
nonsense, that's completely bullshit. It displays you never been
study at an university with a ๐๐ถ๐๐ถ๐๐ถ๐ป๐ด_๐ฝ๐ฟ๐ผ๐ณ๐ฒ๐๐๐ผ๐ฟ.
I was actually a HYPOTHETICAL professor (in my role as writer of these annotations). The method goes like this:
On 02/08/2024 06:51 AM, Volney wrote:
I found 428 errors in Einstein's textNo, you did not.
One great thing about Baez' index is that more than half of the points
also go to Einstein 2 or Zweistein, whoever that may be, of course that
it's a sort of asymptotic anti-inductive excellence, of which most would
be unawares.
On 2/8/2024 12:36 AM, Thomas Heger wrote:
I found 428 errors in Einstein's text and therefore wrote so many
annotations. TH
You're a high school drop-out. You can't fool anyone. Jump inside my kill-file bag
Most likely a few specialists exist in Germany, who actually know.Actually you can read the annotations now online (without
downloading the file).
nonsense, that's completely bullshit. It displays you never been
study at an university with a ๐๐ถ๐๐ถ๐๐ถ๐ป๐ด_๐ฝ๐ฟ๐ผ๐ณ๐ฒ๐๐๐ผ๐ฟ.
I was actually a HYPOTHETICAL professor (in my role as writer of these
annotations). The method goes like this:
you don't even know what ๐_๐ซ๐๐จ๐๐ฉ๐๐ฃ๐_๐ฅ๐ง๐ค๐๐๐จ๐จ๐ค๐ง is, and how he looks like. The
The Hitler was ๐_๐ฅ๐ช๐ฅ๐ฅ๐๐ฉ like ๐จ๐ข๐๐ก๐ก๐๐ฃ๐จ๐ ๐ฎ, where ๐ฉ๐๐_๐๐๐ฅ๐๐ฉ๐๐ก๐๐จ๐ฉ_๐ฌ๐๐จ๐ฉ armed him to
kill Russia.
Am 08.02.2024 um 18:43 schrieb Ryann Kagawa Hanabusa:
Well, possibly you have something else in mind than I do. But I canyou don't even know what ๐_๐ซ๐๐จ๐๐ฉ๐๐ฃ๐_๐ฅ๐ง๐ค๐๐๐จ๐จ๐ค๐ง is, and how he looksMost likely a few specialists exist in Germany, who actually know.Actually you can read the annotations now online (withoutnonsense, that's completely bullshit. It displays you never been
downloading the file).
study at an university with a ๐๐ถ๐๐ถ๐๐ถ๐ป๐ด_๐ฝ๐ฟ๐ผ๐ณ๐ฒ๐๐๐ผ๐ฟ.
I was actually a HYPOTHETICAL professor (in my role as writer of these
annotations). The method goes like this:
like. The
assure you, that I have heard the words 'visiting' and 'professor'
before.
The Hitler was ๐_๐ฅ๐ช๐ฅ๐ฅ๐๐ฉ like ๐จ๐ข๐๐ก๐ก๐๐ฃ๐จ๐ ๐ฎ, where ๐ฉ๐๐_๐๐๐ฅ๐๐ฉ๐๐ก๐๐จ๐ฉ_๐ฌ๐๐จ๐ฉ
armed him to kill Russia.
Actually I have heard this theory before.
On 2/16/2024 12:56 AM, Thomas Heger wrote:
But you need to know the delay in the first place, if you like to add
it.
Which Einstein calculates, it's 1/2 times t'_a - t_a.
Volney wrote:
On 2/16/2024 12:56 AM, Thomas Heger wrote:
But you need to know the delay in the first place, if you like to add
it.
Which Einstein calculates, it's 1/2 times t'_a - t_a.
so true indeed. Watch this picture, and remark Khazaria. What these "germans" want to do, right now, as it was those days. The unbelievable truth about relativity you don't want to see. And certify.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adolf_Hitler#/media/File:Greater_Germanic_Reich.png
Am 17.02.2024 um 11:47 schrieb Mikko:
When a real professor evaluates a translation the main criterion is
whether the translation preseves the meaning of the text.
I'm, of course, not a real professor and my aim was not to evaluate a translation. My aim was to find absolutely all errors in this text (in
the English translation).
On 2/17/2024 11:47 PM, Thomas Heger wrote:
It's pointless, anyhow, because a paper with 400+ errors in it couldFortunately, Einstein's paper doesn't have 400+ errors. Or any errors,
hardly be used for anything of practical value.
for that matter.
On 2/17/2024 4:36 AM, Thomas Heger wrote:
In this context I had critizised the prase 'axis of X', because 'X' wasOf course a translation of X-Achse to 'axis of X' rather than 'X_axis'
already the name of the x-axis of system K.
is hardly the fault of Einstein or a flaw in relativity. Not only are
you unqualified to criticize the physics, you are apparently
unqualified to criticize German-English translations as well.
Den 19.02.2024 06:56, skrev Thomas Heger:
You wrote:
ย "But Einstein gave this another kick and used the same symbol
ย ย twice with different meanings within a single sentence."
You can't blame Einstein for the alleged errors in the translation.
It is interesting to note that you have given up claiming that Einstein
in ยง10 used the same symbol twice with different meanings within a
single sentence. Now you claim to have found it in ยง3. Let's see.
On 2/20/2024 3:11 AM, Thomas Heger wrote:
So, my decision was to write annotations into the English translation,
which is most commonly used.
You may regard this as questionable, but I think, it is perfectly ok.
The correct procedure would be to annotate the German version and list
the alleged faults and why they are faults separately. But that's a
waste of time, as over the last 100+ years many scientists have pored
over the paper looking for issues but have found none.
Am 22.02.2024 um 17:16 schrieb Volney:
Why do you claim this? The name of the x axis is just that, a name. It
could be nearly anything. The sensible part would be to associate the
names of the X (Y or Z) axis with the names of the x (y or z) variables
without using the exact same name. Which is what was done, calling the
axis 'X-Achse' and the associated variable 'x'. Similarly for
Actually symbols in equations are 'case sensitive'. Therefore, 'X' is
not equal to 'x'. (If you think otherwise, you should ask a specialist.)
What is commonly done or used by the public is patently irrelevant in theoretical physics.
On 2/23/2024 7:15 AM, Igarashi Sawamatsu wrote:
these ugly ๐ธ๐ต๐ฎ๐๐ฎ๐ฟ_๐ด๐ผ๐๐_๐ฏ๐ถ๐๐ฐ๐ต๐ฒ๐ lost the war so badly.
Idiot Hanson.... Your "West" won when you began sucking up to them.
You were fooled by transitory situations, leading to think that they are
On 2/23/2024 7:15 AM, Igarashi Sawamatsu wrote:
these ugly ๐ธ๐ต๐ฎ๐๐ฎ๐ฟ_๐ด๐ผ๐๐_๐ฏ๐ถ๐๐ฐ๐ต๐ฒ๐ lost the war so badly.
Idiot Hanson.... Your "West" won when you began sucking up to them.
You were fooled by transitory situations, leading to think that they are people to learn from, and be like.
You never recovered from that blunder, Hanson. Are you Russian? Be responsible and go explain this to Putin.
W dniu 19.04.2024 oย 23:30, Python pisze:
LOL! Maybe function in American English and British English are
different words too?
Maybe. And maybe "mammal" is different than "animal",
even if a dolphin belongs to both classes.
So, what made you think French fonction and English function are the
same words. Are their definitions identical (after the translation)?
Thomas Heger wrote:
Am 12.11.2023 um 19:17 schrieb Frauly Bagaryatsky:
Thomas Heger wrote:Most likely a few specialists exist in Germany, who actually know.
Actually you can read the annotations now online (without downloading >>>>>> the file).
nonsense, that's completely bullshit. It displays you never been study >>>>> at an university with a ๐๐ถ๐๐ถ๐๐ถ๐ป๐ด_๐ฝ๐ฟ๐ผ๐ณ๐ฒ๐๐๐ผ๐ฟ.
I was actually a HYPOTHETICAL professor (in my role as writer of these
annotations).
The method goes like this:
imagine you were a professor and had to write corrections for the
homework of a student (Albert Einstein in this case).
The 'homework' is the text in question ('On the electrodynamics of
moving bodies' in this case).
So my 'duty' would be to write annotations, where I give the student a
few hints, how to avoid errors next time.
I found 428 errors in Einstein's text and therefore wrote so many
annotations.
There are no errors in Einstein's paper.
Thomas Heger wrote:
Am 12.11.2023 um 19:17 schrieb Frauly Bagaryatsky:
Most likely a few specialists exist in Germany, who actually know.nonsense, that's completely bullshit. It displays you never been
study at an university with a ๐๐ถ๐๐ถ๐๐ถ๐ป๐ด_๐ฝ๐ฟ๐ผ๐ณ๐ฒ๐๐๐ผ๐ฟ.
I was actually a HYPOTHETICAL professor (in my role as writer of these
annotations).
Last but not least, you haven't even listed a few instances which may
appear GENUINELY puzzling to a newbie. This tells us you don't even understand the text you are "critiquing".
Thomas Heger wrote:
Am 12.11.2023 um 19:17 schrieb Frauly Bagaryatsky:
Thomas Heger wrote:Most likely a few specialists exist in Germany, who actually know.
Actually you can read the annotations now online (without downloading >>>>> the file).
nonsense, that's completely bullshit. It displays you never been study >>>> at an university with a ๐๐ถ๐๐ถ๐๐ถ๐ป๐ด_๐ฝ๐ฟ๐ผ๐ณ๐ฒ๐๐๐ผ๐ฟ.
I was actually a HYPOTHETICAL professor (in my role as writer of these annotations).
The method goes like this:
imagine you were a professor and had to write corrections for the
homework of a student (Albert Einstein in this case).
The 'homework' is the text in question ('On the electrodynamics of
moving bodies' in this case).
So my 'duty' would be to write annotations, where I give the student a
few hints, how to avoid errors next time.
I found 428 errors in Einstein's text and therefore wrote so many annotations.
There are no errors in Einstein's paper. There are instances of sloppiness, bending over backwards, inconsequential omissions, and the like, all of which are
typical of any science paper.
On 5/19/2024 2:30 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
"inconsequential omissions"???? Like Albert Einstein's 1905 RelativityDuh-h-h! That was a paper on special relativity, and special relativity doesn't involve gravity!
paper NOT neven even mentioning ONCE 'Gravity'.
On 5/19/2024 3:10 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
That's what I said..it didn't include Gravity. Big mistake, wasn't it?No mistake. It is for situations without gravity or where gravitational effects are too small to have any effect. Even the GPS system's GR
(i know yous people just look the other way)
effect is less than one part per billion.
That's what I said..it didn't include Gravity. Big mistake, wasn't it?No mistake. It is for situations without gravity or where gravitational effects are too small to have any effect. Even the GPS system's GR
(i know yous people just look the other way)
effect is less than one part per billion.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 495 |
| Nodes: | 16 (3 / 13) |
| Uptime: | 48:16:07 |
| Calls: | 9,747 |
| Calls today: | 7 |
| Files: | 13,742 |
| Messages: | 6,184,459 |
