On Sunday, October 29, 2023 at 7:20:14โฏPM UTC-7, Gary Harnagel wrote:>
On Sunday, October 29, 2023 at 5:21:11โฏPM UTC-6, mitchr...@gmail.com
wrote:
Would traveling at c not give infinite kinetic energy?
That's what theory says and what experiment confirms.
Then why does it not happen?
Every photon would have it.
But clearly they do not.
Only a finite energy manifests as real gary...
How does an atom absorb infinite energy?
Mitchell Raemsch
Photons have no mass, Mitch, so they never have infinite energy, even at speed c. Atoms have mass, so they can never be accelerated to c.
They're not just "my misconceptions." I'm merely the messenger of what others have claimed. Dono is too focused on labeling me a "crank"
rather than expanding his own hermetically-closed mind to let in some uncertainty.
"What is not surrounded by uncertainty cannot be the truth."
-- Richard Feynman
"Doubt is not a pleasant condition, but certainty is absurd. -- Voltaire
On Thursday, October 26, 2023 at 9:01:24โฏAM UTC-7, Gary Harnagel wrote:
(9) Tachyons with u > c^2/v can be detected by moving the receiverWell, their ("tachyons") energy jumps from +infinity to -infinity. This
toward the tachyon source such that u' < c^2/v, which converts the
situation to Method II.
is unphysical .
mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
Then why does it not happen? Every photon would have it.
But clearly they do not. Only a finite energy manifests as real gary...
How does an atom absorb infinite energy? Mitchell Raemsch
There's an example of a question from a great physicist: assume
infinite energy in a photon and then ask why an atom can have infinite energy. I'm amazed at the lack of interest in the subject of this thread
(see the o.p.) I've been reading some papers by Charles Schwartz:
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 498 |
Nodes: | 16 (0 / 16) |
Uptime: | 66:25:38 |
Calls: | 9,813 |
Calls today: | 1 |
Files: | 13,755 |
Messages: | 6,189,304 |