We have two equal clocks C_A and C_B. They are not synced in any way,
but they are using the same time unit, let's call it second.
The clocks run at the same rate.
Paul B. Andersen wrote:
We have two equal clocks C_A and C_B. They are not synced in any way,
but they are using the same time unit, let's call it second.
The clocks run at the same rate.
nonsense, "equal" clocks are always synced with offsets. Read this, to undrestand even more.
๐ช๐ฎ๐ฟ_๐ฃ๐ถ๐ด_๐ฉ๐ถ๐ฐ๐๐ผ๐ฟ๐ถ๐ฎ_๐ก๐๐น๐ฎ๐ป๐ฑ_๐๐ฎ๐_๐๐ป๐ผ๐๐ต๐ฒ๐ฟ_๐ฆ๐๐ฟ๐ฝ๐ฟ๐ถ๐๐ฒ_๐ณ๐ผ๐ฟ_๐ฃ๐๐๐ถ๐ป
https://b%69%74%63%68ute.com/video/FWoCOARqFLEB
๐ก๐ผ๐_๐ฎ_๐ฝ๐ฒ๐ป๐ป๐_๐บ๐ผ๐ฟ๐ฒ_๐ณ๐ผ๐ฟ_๐จ๐ธ๐ฟ๐ฎ๐ถ๐ป๐ฒ.
https://b%69%74%63%68ute.com/video/iloqV2zu306Z
https://b%69%74%63%68ute.com/video/OZaUGR8ROnyA
Richard Hachel wrote:
https://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/specrel/specrel.pdf
The problem with Einstein's synchronization is that it is defined in a Galilean way.
Einstein presupposes in his frame of reference, a flat and absolute
present time, and therefore goes very quickly to definition, to move on to the next paragraph.
What is he really saying new? Nothing.
The great thing is to say:
tA'-tA=2AB/c
I can also add, in the same sense, that a swallow is a swallow.
Then Einstein will commit the enormous relativistic error of immediately and without paying attention to t(AB)=t(BA), a proposition which can only be true for a neutral observer placed at an equal distance from A and B, and having to take into account only identical anisochrony, and perfect simultaneity of the two watches.
The equality that he posits is therefore completely false, intellectually false, physically false, for the enormous majority of points in his space that he will take as reference.
His synchronization method, but he does not say it, is ONLY valid for a given point P, and the simultaneity of various events occurring in the frame of reference is ONLY valid for this point and not the integrity of the frame of reference.
He doesn't explain this.
Or worse, he doesn't know it.
R.H.
Nature forgot to synchronize.
Nature does not display any...clocks.
Den 27.02.2024 01:46, skrev Python:
Not "in France", this is not the point, the point is that Nemo NNTP
server did not relay the post. This is unrelated to Google Groups
shutdown as Paul in not posting through this gateway,
Instead of complaining here, which is pointless, you'd better advise
Nemo's administrator.
Please post these links so Richard Hackel can read them.
Free NNTP servers:
https://www.eternal-september.org https://www.i2pn2.org/
On 2/27/2024 5:47 AM, Richard Hachel wrote:
I repeat, the solution proposed by Einstein is biased in the sense that
we will never be able to match two watches together, it is IMPOSSIBLE,
it is abstract, it is ridiculous in SR well understood.
Einstein defines what it means for two clocks to be synchronized.
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 546 |
Nodes: | 16 (0 / 16) |
Uptime: | 168:25:33 |
Calls: | 10,385 |
Calls today: | 2 |
Files: | 14,057 |
Messages: | 6,416,545 |