One thing I've been trying to figure out is "the infinite higher-orders
of acceleration".
This is where for example that classically there's that "rest is rest
and motion is motion", and it's that v is dp/dt, rest 0 and motion
non-zero, it's meters/second, and in seconds/meter, it's that motion is non-zero and rest is infinity.
It's kind of like trying to figure out for running constants, how it's
so, that, something like volume, in 3-D, after what is atomic mass and
weight or the gramme-atom and these kinds of things, that the "running constants" get really involved in the regimes in the very small.
us +25 Angstroms +5 atoms +-0 Planck length -5 superstrings -25
Volney wrote:
For what it's worth, some higher derivatives have (somewhat whimsical)
names. The derivative of acceleration with respect to time is called
jerk, the derivative of jerk is called snap or jounce, the derivative
of snap is crackle, the derivative of crackle is pop. Someone was a
breakfast cereal fan. The highest derivative I know of that's actually
used is snap, when designing the transition of roads or railroads from
straight to a curve they try to minimize the 'snap' of a vehicle
following the transition segment.
I'd heard of jerk. Many years ago, Norman Dean "invented" the Dean
drive, a system of rotating masses with the center of rotation of the
masses being moved at particular times in the rotation cycle. He showed
that the weight of the assembly was decreased when running - on a
bathroom scales.
On 03/09/2024 12:37 PM, Ramiro Juรกrez wrote:
gharnagel wrote:
Volney wrote:
For what it's worth, some higher derivatives have (somewhat
whimsical)
names. The derivative of acceleration with respect to time is called
jerk, the derivative of jerk is called snap or jounce, the derivative
of snap is crackle, the derivative of crackle is pop. Someone was a
breakfast cereal fan. The highest derivative I know of that's
actually used is snap, when designing the transition of roads or
railroads from straight to a curve they try to minimize the 'snap' of
a vehicle following the transition segment.
I'd heard of jerk. Many years ago, Norman Dean "invented" the Dean
drive, a system of rotating masses with the center of rotation of the
masses being moved at particular times in the rotation cycle. He
showed that the weight of the assembly was decreased when running - on
a bathroom scales.
my friend, heard?? It's enough to push body on a line with a forcemeter
on it. You get the slope for the jerk since the acceleration is not
constant.
Ohh my, heard of. And you want to speed higher than light, do you. Are
we from amrica??
What you get is that scales, measure deflection, in the system, while balances, measure not deflection, according to references.
Physics is an open and closed system.
So, the infinitely-many higher-orders of acceleration,
basically follows directly for the infinitely-many divisions of _time_,
all together, altogether, that "the physics", is a theory of sum
potentials, a theory of omega potentials, and altogether: real.
whatever you say it's completely nonsense. Pushing an object on a line,
and bouncing back repeatedly, makes acceleration NOT constant, me
friendo. Plotting the data shows the jerk directly and no debate. You
relativists around here, beyond arduino, have no laboratory experience
whatsoever in physics. All you know is Einstine, a lower than mediocre
highschool student.
Hey now, we're talking about f = ma, and about the infinitely-many higher-order derivatives of velocity, and meters/second and
seconds/meter, that it is possible to have constant velocity, constant
rest for that matter, constant acceleration and so on,
On 03/09/2024 11:44 PM, Ismael Balazowsky Homutov wrote:
whatever you say it's completely nonsense. Pushing an object on a
line, and bouncing back repeatedly, makes acceleration NOT constant, >>>>> me friendo. Plotting the data shows the jerk directly and no debate. >>>>> You relativists around here, beyond arduino, have no laboratory
experience whatsoever in physics. All you know is Einstine, a lower
than mediocre highschool student.
Moment and Motion: inertial momentum https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lz-c4UcaBcA https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lz-c4UcaBcA
Acceleration, mechanics, interaction, higher-order acceleration,
motion and rest, continuity, hologram universe, Mach,
physical quantities, point to total, dp/dt, dv/dt, change
Replace all that, with Arindam's physics.
bt
gharnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> wrote:
William O. Davis analyzed the system which was referred to by John W.
Campbell, Jr. as "the fourth law of motion" - i.e., jerk. Davis and G.
Harry Stine got together and tested the invention. They hung it from a
wire and oriented it so the supposed thrust would be horizontal. There
was no net thrust. The "weight loss" was due to nonlinearities in the
bathroom scales because of the thumping around of the weights.
Yes, a mistake that is made over and over again.
There was some ado some time ago about some students who had put a
gyroscope on a precision 'balance'.
They noticed a change of weight that depended on the sense of rotation. Apparently the bearings are smoother in the direction in which they are normally run, producing less vibration to rectify, Jan
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 546 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 05:33:41 |
Calls: | 10,386 |
Calls today: | 1 |
Files: | 14,058 |
Messages: | 6,416,633 |