Le 14/03/2024 à 15:02, "Paul B. Andersen" a écrit :
Your opinion of SR is irrelevant.
SR is a consistent theory, and the issue is: "Does SR predict that
accelerated objects will behave as you claim they do?"
No, YOU are saying that my concepts are irrelevant.
As for accelerated frames of reference, I said that things are poorly explained by physicists and that certain equations are false.
Some are correct, like To=(x/c).sqrt(1+2c²/ax) Or x=(c²/a)[sqrt(1+a²To²/c²)-1] But many others are incorrect.
Le 14/03/2024 à 15:02, "Paul B. Andersen" a écrit :
https://paulba.no/paper/index.html But the issue is:
Does SR predict what you claim it predicts?
Here is the problem: We now know that Newtonian physics is out of the running, and that we must use a relativistic theory.
Le 13/03/2024 à 21:59, "Paul B. Andersen" a écrit :
Above you have demonstrated that you belong to the group that
falls into hysterical reactions.
Don't worry about my reactions.
Simply ask yourself: “Is this man lying, or is he telling the truth?”
Le 14/03/2024 à 15:02, "Paul B. Andersen" a écrit :
So for any t > 0 Vm > Vr/2
It is not possible to make SR predict anything else!
====================================================
You don't understand anything I'm telling you...
In these conditions, it is very difficult to discuss.
Le 16/03/2024 à 14:18, "Paul B. Andersen" a écrit :
So Richard Hachel's theory is identical to Newtonian Mechanics.
Absolutely not. Your comments are criminal.
When I write To=(x/c).sqrt(1+c²/ax) it is not SR.
So there is no problem: Vr = a.Tr where a is the proper acceleration of
the rocket and Vr is the speed of the rocket in the inertial frame.
Le 18/03/2024 à 22:12, "Paul B. Andersen" a écrit :
The proper time of the rocket when it passes Tau Ceti is:
τ = (c/a)⋅arsinh(a⋅t) = 3.13894 y
Here is the error. Physicists use the Minkowskian metric and it is not correct. You have to use (I understand that this is confusing) the
Newtonian equation. Physicists absolutely need to understand something:
the rocket is AT REST in its frame of reference, and it is from start to finish.
n 3/16/2024 10:29 AM, Richard Hachel wrote:
Le 16/03/2024 à 14:18, "Paul B. Andersen" a écrit :Why are you telling Paul that his father smelt of elderberries?
But why is "[SR]" in the subject line when you only are talking about
Newtonian Mechanics?
Vous plaisantez, monsieur. C'est indigne de vous.
Je vous supplie de revenir à plus d'intelligence.
On 3/16/2024 10:29 AM, Richard Hachel wrote:
Le 16/03/2024 à 14:18, "Paul B. Andersen" a écrit :Why are you telling Paul that his father smelt of elderberries?
But why is "[SR]" in the subject line when you only are talking about
Newtonian Mechanics?
Vous plaisantez, monsieur. C'est indigne de vous.
Je vous supplie de revenir à plus d'intelligence.
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 546 |
Nodes: | 16 (0 / 16) |
Uptime: | 170:22:16 |
Calls: | 10,385 |
Calls today: | 2 |
Files: | 14,057 |
Messages: | 6,416,557 |