In sci.physics.electromag Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> wrote: <snip>
Einstein's theories are pure nonsense.
Just because you can't understand them doesn't make them wrong,
crackpot.
Jim Pennino wrote:
In sci.physics.electromag Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com>
wrote: <snip>
Einstein's theories are pure nonsense.
Just because you can't understand them doesn't make them wrong,
crackpot.
lol, the Einstine was a gay, lol
๐๐น๐ฏ๐ฒ๐ฟ๐_๐๐ถ๐ป๐๐๐ฒ๐ถ๐ป_๐ฎ๐ป๐ฑ_๐ต๐ถ๐_๐น๐ผ๐๐ฒ๐น๐...๐๐บ...๐ต๐ถ๐_๐๐บ...๐๐ด๐น๐_๐ฎ๐๐...๐๐จ๐ฆ๐๐๐ก๐.
https://b%69%74%63%68ute.com/video/deIICK5dilFK
Le 26/04/2024 ร 06:40, Ross Finlayson a รฉcrit :
On 04/25/2024 12:43 PM, Obed Erdรฉlyi wrote:
Jim Pennino wrote:
In sci.physics.electromag Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: <snip>
Einstein's theories are pure nonsense.
Just because you can't understand them doesn't make them wrong,
crackpot.
I do understand they are nonsense.
In sci.physics Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> wrote:
Le 26/04/2024 ร 06:40, Ross Finlayson a รฉcrit :
On 04/25/2024 12:43 PM, Obed Erdรฉlyi wrote:
Jim Pennino wrote:
In sci.physics.electromag Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> >>>>> wrote: <snip>
Einstein's theories are pure nonsense.
Just because you can't understand them doesn't make them wrong,
crackpot.
I do understand they are nonsense.
That is your understanding because you are utterly clueless about math
and science in general, crackpot.
<snip crackpot babble>
On 04/25/2024 12:43 PM, Obed Erdรฉlyi wrote:
Jim Pennino wrote:
Just because you can't understand them doesn't make them wrong,
crackpot.
lol, the Einstine was a gay, lol
Actually Einstein's sexy, and his long-time live-in lover
was a Black jazz singer from New York City.
Jim Pennino wrote:
In sci.physics Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> wrote:
Le 26/04/2024 ร 06:40, Ross Finlayson a รฉcrit :
On 04/25/2024 12:43 PM, Obed Erdรฉlyi wrote:
Jim Pennino wrote:
In sci.physics.electromag Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> >>>>>> wrote: <snip>
Einstein's theories are pure nonsense.
Just because you can't understand them doesn't make them wrong,
crackpot.
I do understand they are nonsense.
That is your understanding because you are utterly clueless about math
and science in general, crackpot.
<snip crackpot babble>
Penisnino's Law: Smaller the penis, greater the pee.
In sci.physics bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
Penisnino's Law: Smaller the penis, greater the pee.
And yet another 9 year old pipes up...
On 4/26/24 00:41, bertietaylor wrote:
Penisnino's Law: Smaller the penis, greater the pee.
Hehe :) Penis? Penis is something "Pennino"s of this land of the brave
look up to and never reach, so they just become their groupies.
On 4/26/24 00:41, bertietaylor wrote:
Penisnino's Law: Smaller the penis, greater the pee.
Hehe :) Penis? Penis is something "Pennino"s of this land of the brave
look up to and never reach, so they just become their groupies.
They invest decades of their lives in that too, cause penis is good for
them.
Le 27/04/2024 ร 14:35, Ross Finlayson a รฉcrit :
On 04/26/2024 06:47 PM, Jim Pennino wrote:
In sci.physics Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> wrote:
On 4/26/24 00:41, bertietaylor wrote:
Penisnino's Law: Smaller the penis, greater the pee.
That sounds more elegant than "the size of the penis is in inverse
proportion to the pee it generates".
Or in other words, the jealous mediocrity, incapable of creativity, can
only shower abuse upon the creative genius. At best! So the Arindam has to
be careful about the Roachies and the Penisninos, who could turn Brutus or Chapman given the chance. Better to get peed upon than to bleed, what.
btw Roachie, what's the latest about your crowdfunding from physicists to bump me off? How much raised so far?
In sci.physics Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> wrote:
Le 27/04/2024 ร 14:35, Ross Finlayson a รฉcrit :
On 04/26/2024 06:47 PM, Jim Pennino wrote:
In sci.physics Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> wrote:
On 4/26/24 00:41, bertietaylor wrote:
Penisnino's Law: Smaller the penis, greater the pee.
That sounds more elegant than "the size of the penis is in inverse
proportion to the pee it generates".
Or in other words, the jealous mediocrity, incapable of creativity, can
only shower abuse upon the creative genius. At best! So the Arindam has to >> be careful about the Roachies and the Penisninos, who could turn Brutus or >> Chapman given the chance. Better to get peed upon than to bleed, what.
btw Roachie, what's the latest about your crowdfunding from physicists to
bump me off? How much raised so far?
Is that the results of your expriment that shows that conventional
science is wrong, crackpot?
In sci.physics Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> wrote:
Le 27/04/2024 ร 14:35, Ross Finlayson a รฉcrit :
On 04/26/2024 06:47 PM, Jim Pennino wrote:
In sci.physics Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> wrote:
On 4/26/24 00:41, bertietaylor wrote:
Penisnino's Law: Smaller the penis, greater the pee.
That sounds more elegant than "the size of the penis is in inverse
proportion to the pee it generates".
Or in other words, the jealous mediocrity, incapable of creativity, can
only shower abuse upon the creative genius. At best! So the Arindam has to >> be careful about the Roachies and the Penisninos, who could turn Brutus or >> Chapman given the chance. Better to get peed upon than to bleed, what.
btw Roachie, what's the latest about your crowdfunding from physicists to
bump me off? How much raised so far?
Is that the results of your expriment that shows that conventional
science is wrong, crackpot?
Jim Pennino wrote:
In sci.physics Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> wrote:
Le 27/04/2024 ร 14:35, Ross Finlayson a รฉcrit :
On 04/26/2024 06:47 PM, Jim Pennino wrote:
In sci.physics Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> wrote:
On 4/26/24 00:41, bertietaylor wrote:
Penisnino's Law: Smaller the penis, greater the pee.
That sounds more elegant than "the size of the penis is in inverse
proportion to the pee it generates".
Or in other words, the jealous mediocrity, incapable of creativity,
can only shower abuse upon the creative genius. At best! So the
Arindam has to be careful about the Roachies and the Penisninos, who
could turn Brutus or Chapman given the chance. Better to get peed
upon than to bleed, what. btw Roachie, what's the latest about your
crowdfunding from physicists to bump me off?ย How much raised so far?
Is that the results of your expriment that shows that conventional
science is wrong, crackpot?
What an honour for Arindam, Penisnino!
To be a sacrifice for genuine, great, wonderful Science that will take humanity to the stars, solve all problems on Earth despite the worst
from the penisninos_allsorts!
Woof-woof
bt
Woof-woof
bt
In sci.physics Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> wrote:
Le 27/04/2024 ร 14:35, Ross Finlayson a รฉcrit :
On 04/26/2024 06:47 PM, Jim Pennino wrote:
In sci.physics Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> wrote:
On 4/26/24 00:41, bertietaylor wrote:
Penisnino's Law: Smaller the penis, greater the pee.
That sounds more elegant than "the size of the penis is in inverse
proportion to the pee it generates".
Or in other words, the jealous mediocrity, incapable of creativity, can
only shower abuse upon the creative genius. At best! So the Arindam has to >> be careful about the Roachies and the Penisninos, who could turn Brutus or >> Chapman given the chance. Better to get peed upon than to bleed, what.
btw Roachie, what's the latest about your crowdfunding from physicists to
bump me off? How much raised so far?
Is that the results of your expriment that shows that conventional
science is wrong, crackpot?
Jim Pennino wrote:
In sci.physics Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> wrote:
Le 27/04/2024 ร 14:35, Ross Finlayson a รฉcrit :
On 04/26/2024 06:47 PM, Jim Pennino wrote:
In sci.physics Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> wrote:
On 4/26/24 00:41, bertietaylor wrote:
Penisnino's Law: Smaller the penis, greater the pee.
That sounds more elegant than "the size of the penis is in inverse
proportion to the pee it generates".
Or in other words, the jealous mediocrity, incapable of creativity, can
only shower abuse upon the creative genius. At best! So the Arindam has to >>> be careful about the Roachies and the Penisninos, who could turn Brutus or >>> Chapman given the chance. Better to get peed upon than to bleed, what.
btw Roachie, what's the latest about your crowdfunding from physicists to >>> bump me off? How much raised so far?
Is that the results of your expriment that shows that conventional
science is wrong, crackpot?
It would appear so, Penisnino.
On 4/27/2024 4:41 AM, Athel Cornish-Bowden wrote:
That is not the case, so this is a new discovery - the Lorentz force
does NOT have an equal and opposite reaction.
Your point is merely theoretical. My evidence is experimental.
"My" evidence.
A possibility is an emergence of multiple personality disorder where the personalities are not fully separate yet.
Volney wrote:
On 4/27/2024 4:41 AM, Athel Cornish-Bowden wrote:
That is not the case, so this is a new discovery - the Lorentz force
does NOT have an equal and opposite reaction.
Your point is merely theoretical. My evidence is experimental.
"My" evidence.
A possibility is an emergence of multiple personality disorder where the
personalities are not fully separate yet.
you are partially correct. Here is how bullshit looks like
On 4/27/2024 4:41 AM, Athel Cornish-Bowden wrote:
That is not the case, so this is a new discovery - the Lorentz force
does NOT have an equal and opposite reaction.
Your point is merely theoretical. My evidence is experimental.
"My" evidence. A possibility is an emergence of multiple personality
disorder where the personalities are not fully separate yet.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 498 |
| Nodes: | 16 (3 / 13) |
| Uptime: | 30:18:53 |
| Calls: | 9,798 |
| Calls today: | 17 |
| Files: | 13,749 |
| Messages: | 6,188,695 |