Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> wrote:
More stable, more independent on the environment and its fancies a
device is - better it is. Perfect clocks would ignore the nature
completely.
Au contraire, perfect clocks are perfect nature, Jan
W dniu 26.04.2024 oย 22:09, Python pisze:
The mumble of Maciej Wozniak was not even consistent, and he has
been proven demented
Sure.
No, I didn't write it
I corrected a few typos.
You lied impudently, as expected from a Shit's fanatic. Just like your twin-idiot Dono. Well, The Shit of your idiot guru has been proven inconsistent; what else could you do.
W dniu 01.05.2024 oย 13:41, gharnagel pisze:
and who can't define a concept.
Even without the ability of defining information, my competence in the subject exists, in opposition to yours.
And your ravings and insults are not going to change anything - sane
people, as anyone can check at GPS, keep assuming the second to be 9
192 631 770 on Earth, but 9 192 631 774 on a GPS satellite. Common
sense was warning your bunch of idiots.
Maciej Wozniak wrote:
If you've not fabricated the rule -
well, show me some link.
Wozzie doesn't deserve a link because he is a dishonest troll,
but I will magnanimously provide one: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/every
"Every" is an adjective. An adjective modifies a noun. Wozzie didn't
provide the noun.
On a GPS satellite, the usual definition of the second applies. But in
order for the SIGNALS from GPS satellites to be received on earth at the correct frequencies, the time-base on the satellite must tick about 4
parts in 10^10 more slowly than a corresponding time-base on earth's
geoid (mean sea level).
Tom Roberts wrote:
On a GPS satellite, the usual definition of the second applies. But in
order for the SIGNALS from GPS satellites to be received on earth at
the correct frequencies, the time-base on the satellite must tick about
4 parts in 10^10 more slowly than a corresponding time-base on earth's
geoid (mean sea level).
monseneor, you misundrestand the entire procedure -it's not about the
signal propagation, but the difference in the gravity gradient. The
signals transmission are implied, but only after that.
On 5/4/2024 11:46 AM, Tom Roberts wrote:
On a GPS satellite, the usual definition of the second applies. But in
order for the SIGNALS from GPS satellites to be received on earth at
the correct frequencies, the time-base on the satellite must tick about
4 parts in 10^10 more slowly than a corresponding time-base on earth's
geoid (mean sea level).
Perhaps it may be easier to understand if it is compared to the Doppler effect of a train horn.
Consider a train whose horn sounds at exactly 440 Hz (musical tone A4). Another train approaches at 134.796 km/hr. The passenger on the platform hears its horn at 440 Hz or A4. But the passengers aboard the train
insist it sounds at 391.995 Hz, better known to musicians as G or G4.
The signal from the GPS birds is much like this (frequency shifted but
for a different reason), but its master frequency is set so that the
signal is received at the correct frequency. Much like the second train.
Maciej Wozniak wrote:
Nobody cares what your mad church assumes accurate or not,
Harrie. Face it, poor trash.
Wozzie believes that if he posts last, he wins the duel )
He is such a tragic figure.
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 546 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 14:44:52 |
Calls: | 10,389 |
Files: | 14,061 |
Messages: | 6,416,903 |