1. Forum
  2. Usenet
  3. SCI.MATH

  • Re: SpaceTime

    From Dmitriy Makricosta@21:1/5 to gharnagel on Sun Jun 2 20:30:41 2024
    XPost: sci.physics.relativity, sci.physics

    gharnagel wrote:

    Ross Finlayson wrote:

    Most people know that dead-reckoning isn't really a thing, then there's
    wide reliance on the constancy of light-speed,
    and its effectively large value.

    Actually, the speed of light is really, really slow compared to the size
    of the universe. This, of course, is a proof that tachyons MUST exist.

    ohh really, why dont you better wash your feet

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Hank =?iso-8859-1?q?Bogd=E1n?=@21:1/5 to gharnagel on Mon Jun 3 19:57:05 2024
    XPost: sci.physics.relativity, sci.physics

    gharnagel wrote:

    Le 03/06/2024 ร  01:22, hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) a รฉcrit :
    That is not a valid science. )

    And tachyons? Yes?

    They are hypothetical until confirmed by experiment, but they cannot be refuted without experimental evidence. Bloviating doesn't count as
    evidence.

    so you cannot refute anything without experimental evidence. Amazing, this usenet user lika a man married another man. You have no point, my friend.
    Here is a valid point, with proofs and everything. Which means that you
    america are not that stupid as you appear to be.

    ๐—ข๐—น๐—ฑ_๐—ช๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—น๐—ฑ_๐—ข๐—ฟ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ_๐—ง๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐˜๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐—ฎ_๐—›๐—ถ๐˜€๐˜๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐˜†,_๐—˜๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜†๐˜๐—ต๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด_๐—ช๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ_๐—•๐—ฒ๐—ฒ๐—ป_๐—ง๐—ผ๐—น๐—ฑ_๐—œ๐˜€_๐—”_๐—Ÿ๐—ถ๐—ฒ
    https://b%69%74%63%68%75te.com/%76%69%64eo/NetXZ2FVTLSG

    a science documentary, actually making perfectly sense.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)