Einstein's formulas work better than Newton's and that's a fact.
Luigi Fortunati wrote:
Einstein's formulas work better than Newton's and that's a fact.
no shit Sherlock.
Hachel's formulas work better than Einstein's and that's a fact.
R.H.
the Einstine was a mustache man.
Le 15/06/2024 à 23:34, Python a écrit :
I doubt it. Ask him.
Yes, but at this price, something strange is evident.
You keep repeating: "Hachel is a joke, you should definitely not think
that he is not a big dick in the whole history of humanity, he is not a three-time Nobel Prize winner, he knows nothing in sociology, nothing in medicine, nothing in theology, nothing in relativistic physics, etc...."
Le 15/06/2024 à 16:21, Python a écrit :
Nurse! Wozniak is shitting in his pants again!
Laisse Maciej tranquille. Il se trompe certes sur le fait que t'=t.
Mais il est moins bouffon que toi.
W dniu 15.06.2024 o 23:35, Python pisze:
Nurse! Wozniak shit his pants again tonight!
See, trash: I've proven the mumble of your idiot guru to be not even consistent, and you can do nothing about it but to lie and slander. But
you will do what you can for the glory of your moronic church.
See, trash:
Yes, I see trash every time Wozzie posts.
I've proven the mumble of your idiot guru to be not even consistent,
Only a delusional non compos mentis would claim that and all Wozzie can
do is lie about it.
Richard Hachel wrote:
Le 15/06/2024 à 14:07, Roeidi Hegedüs a écrit :
Luigi Fortunati wrote:
Einstein's formulas work better than Newton's and that's a fact.
no shit Sherlock.
Hachel's formulas work better than Einstein's and that's a fact.
Nonsense.
--
Jan
Richard Hachel wrote:
Le 15/06/2024 à 14:07, Roeidi Hegedüs a écrit :
Luigi Fortunati wrote:
Einstein's formulas work better than Newton's and that's a fact.
no shit Sherlock.
Hachel's formulas work better than Einstein's and that's a fact.
Nonsense.
Lorsqu'on accuse quelqu'un, il faut des preuves concordantes et
acceptées de tous.
W dniu 21.06.2024 o 16:14, gharnagel pisze:
No, it's not. Wozzie deleted where I explained that
Put your explaination straight into your dumb, fanatic ass, where it
belongs. If I said "3 days ago" you wouldn't ask what I meant, would you? You're not THAT stupid, are you?
"'Speed' in space is a curiously slippery term, as it is relative to
whatever point you select as 'fixed' -- but the points in space are
never fixed." -- Robert A. Heinlein
Maciej Wozniak wrote:
OK, trash - an observer going with c/2 through Solar system is going to
measure the length of a day. What is the prediction of the physics of
your idiot guru for the result? No precision better than 1% needed.
A "day"? What is a "day"? The observer is in the solar system and his
speed is c/2. With respect to what? Are we talking about a Mars day
and relative to Mars, or a Jupiter day, etc. You leave out a ton of information, Mr. Engineer.
gharnagel wrote:
See, trash:
Yes, I see trash every time Wozzie posts.
I've proven the mumble of your idiot guru to be not even consistent,
Only a delusional non compos mentis would claim that and all Wozzie can
do is lie about it.
i have to agree. It looks like the science and physics in america has stopped. No physicist is posting here anymore. It means they agree in
the
Einstine wrong. They lost their life supporting the Einstine, who left
his
kids and family, then left with his cousin, a man, in america to whore.
That's relativity 1.0.1, a homework stolen from some teachers.
Maciej Wozniak wrote:
Too bad for dishonest, stupid Wozzie-fool that he can't articulate anI've proven the moronic mumble of your idiot guru to be not even
unambiguous question. His dishonesty is
consistent
Regurgitating bool poop doesn't make it smell any better.
Maciej Wozniak wrote:
Too bad for your idiot guru who was using it as the time unit. Don't
you think, poor halfbrain?
Too bad for dishonest, stupid Wozzie-fool that he can't articulate an unambiguous question. His dishonesty is underlined by his pivot to
blaming Saint Albert for it.
W dniu 23.06.2024 o 22:52, gharnagel pisze:
Wozzie has never, ever done that. He is exceedingly
Yes, I did. Pointed directly 2 denying itself predictions of the physics
of your idiot guru, and some fanatic idiots insulting, lying and
slandering are changing nothing. Sorry, trash.
OK, trash - an observer going with c/2 through Solar system is going
to measure the length of a day. What is the prediction of the physics
of your idiot guru for the result? No precision better than 1%
needed.
A "day"? What is a "day"?
A day is a day, Harrie. You're an incredible idiot, sure, but you've
heard of days, haven't you?
Which day, janitor? There are 8 planets in the solar system with Jupiter having a day something like 10 hours long, while Venus has a day about
2/3s of an Earth year. (and if you whine "butwhataboutPluto" fine, 9
planets if you want). Plus any number of minor planets, moons, all with different days.
On 6/20/2024 12:53 PM, Maciej Wozniak wrote:
A "day"? What is a "day"?
A day is a day, Harrie. You're an incredible idiot, sure, but you've
heard of days, haven't you?
Which day, janitor? There are 8 planets in the solar system with Jupiter having a day something like 10 hours long, while Venus has a day about
2/3s of an Earth year. (and if you whine "butwhataboutPluto" fine, 9
planets if you want). Plus any number of minor planets, moons, all with different days.
On 6/26/2024 7:00 PM, bertietaylor wrote:
Einstein was the greatest bungler of all time.
Sooner Arindam's physics gets followed the better.
But Arindam (that's you) doesn't even have any physics.
On 6/26/2024 7:00 PM, bertietaylor wrote:
Einstein was the greatest bungler of all time.
Sooner Arindam's physics gets followed the better.
But Arindam (that's you) doesn't even have any physics.
Einstein was the greatest bungler of all time.
Sooner Arindam's physics gets followed the better.
On 6/26/2024 7:00 PM, bertietaylor wrote:
Einstein was the greatest bungler of all time. Sooner Arindam's physics
gets followed the better.
But Arindam (that's you) doesn't even have any physics.
On 6/26/2024 7:00 PM, bertietaylor wrote:
Einstein was the greatest bungler of all time. Sooner Arindam's physics
gets followed the better.
But Arindam (that's you) doesn't even have any physics.
On 6/26/2024 7:00 PM, bertietaylor wrote:
Einstein was the greatest bungler of all time. Sooner Arindam's physics
gets followed the better.
But Arindam (that's you) doesn't even have any physics.
The moron Moroney is more dishonest than stupid.
Basically a moral and intellectual coward.
Newton's laws of motion have been updated with the disovery of
electricity to begin with, and my rail gun experiments that follow.
Starting from 2015, when they denied it on flimsy grounds. However the
most recent experiments have kept them shut. At least they are not
accusing me of cheating, by making my hand push the armature!
That experriment throws out thermodynamics, relativity, and quantum.
Energy is constantly getting created and destroyed in our infinite
universe.
The world knows that, thanks to facebook, youtube, usenet and of course directly from viewing by family and friends.
All those, such as below, can be easily accessed with some online
skills.
Searches on sci.physics will suffice.
https://www.facebook.com/100000534193755/videos/1238224284250354/
Cheers,
Arindam Banerjee
Arindam Banerjee wrote:
Newton's laws of motion have been updated with the disovery of
electricity to begin with, and my rail gun experiments that follow.
Starting from 2015, when they denied it on flimsy grounds. However the
most recent experiments have kept them shut. At least they are not
accusing me of cheating, by making my hand push the armature!
That experriment throws out thermodynamics, relativity, and quantum.
Energy is constantly getting created and destroyed in our infinite
universe.
Actually, that's quantum field theory.
The world knows that, thanks to facebook, youtube, usenet and of course
directly from viewing by family and friends.
Your family and friends are creating and destroying energy?
All those, such as below, can be easily accessed with some online
skills.
Searches on sci.physics will suffice.
https://www.facebook.com/100000534193755/videos/1238224284250354/
Cheers,
Arindam Banerjee
That video doesn't refute conventional physics. In fact, what you say
in the blurb with it paints you as a crackpot:
"Spacetime gets binned."
Well, that's fine with me, but I've seen no proff.
"The universe gets straightened out. It does not expand. It is infinite.
Infinite is fine with me also, but that doesn't refute expansion. You
must explain the red shift.
"No black holes but cold cores of stars that give up their bright
hydrogen
cover."
How long do you think it takes for a star to cool down?
"Which become nebulae."
That happens when stars explode.
"Then a cold core enters there to form a bright star once again in
trillion year cycles.
Not long enough. And where does this "cold core" come from? You said
it was cold
to begin with:
"The centre of stars and planets are not hot but immensely cold."
You're denying thermodynamics and heat transfer theory. You're
definitely not a
physicist.
"Superconducting currents create the magnetic field."
And where do these currents come from? And magnetic fields can be
created by
nonsuperconducting currents. You can't get from a rail gun experiment
to all
of these bizarre ideas.
Le 30/06/2024 à 00:16, Jim Pennino a écrit :
Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> wrote:
Le 29/06/2024 à 12:16, Jim Pennino a écrit :
bertietaylor wrote:
Jim Pennino wrote:
bertietaylor wrote:
Jim Pennino wrote:
bertietaylor wrote:
Jim Pennino wrote:
In sci.physics Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> wrote:
On 6/26/2024 7:00 PM, bertietaylor wrote:
Einstein was the greatest bungler of all time.
Sooner Arindam's physics gets followed the better.
But Arindam (that's you) doesn't even have any physics.
But he has taken a lot of physic.
Definitions of physic. noun. a purging medicine; stimulates evacuation
of the bowels.
True with Arindam's physics the world will unitedly crap upon the heads
of the E=mcc cend hanters. And bury them. At the moment they are running
shit scared. Repent, you creeps!
Woof woof
Bertietaylor
Just as bat shit crazy as Arindam...
All sort of shits will descend upon the e=mcc chanters like Jimpee the >>>>>>> Penisnino.
You sound like a babbling 10 year old.
You sound desperate.
Desperate for what, child?
Not for, but from. Desperate from leading a life of lies.
Guffaw!!
I'm not the one pushing "theories" that violate Newton's Laws, crackpot.
They are not theories any more, o abusive one.
Newton's laws of motion have been updated with the disovery of
electricity to begin with, and my rail gun experiments that follow.
Starting from 2015, when they denied it on flimsy grounds. However the
most recent experiments have kept them shut. At least they are not
accusing me of cheating, by making my hand push the armature!
That experriment throws out thermodynamics, relativity, and quantum.
Energy is constantly getting created and destroyed in our infinite
universe.
The world knows that, thanks to facebook, youtube, usenet and of course directly from viewing by family and friends.
All those, such as below, can be easily accessed with some online skills. Searches on sci.physics will suffice.
https://www.facebook.com/100000534193755/videos/1238224284250354/
Cheers,
Arindam Banerjee
Arindam Banerjee wrote:
Newton's laws of motion have been updated with the disovery of
electricity to begin with, and my rail gun experiments that follow.
Starting from 2015, when they denied it on flimsy grounds. However the
most recent experiments have kept them shut. At least they are not
accusing me of cheating, by making my hand push the armature!
That experriment throws out thermodynamics, relativity, and quantum.
Energy is constantly getting created and destroyed in our infinite
universe.
Actually, that's quantum field theory.
The world knows that, thanks to facebook, youtube, usenet and of course
directly from viewing by family and friends.
Your family and friends are creating and destroying energy?
All those, such as below, can be easily accessed with some online
skills.
Searches on sci.physics will suffice.
https://www.facebook.com/100000534193755/videos/1238224284250354/
Cheers,
Arindam Banerjee
That video doesn't refute conventional physics.
in the blurb with it paints you as a crackpot:
"Spacetime gets binned."
Well, that's fine with me, but I've seen no proff.
"The universe gets straightened out. It does not expand. It is infinite.
Infinite is fine with me also, but that doesn't refute expansion. You
must explain the red shift.
"No black holes but cold cores of stars that give up their bright
hydrogen
cover."
How long do you think it takes for a star to cool down?
"Which become nebulae."
That happens when stars explode.
"Then a cold core enters there to form a bright star once again in
trillion year cycles.
Not long enough. And where does this "cold core" come from? You said
it was cold
to begin with:
"The centre of stars and planets are not hot but immensely cold."
You're denying thermodynamics and heat transfer theory. You're
definitely not a
physicist.
"Superconducting currents create the magnetic field."
And where do these currents come from? And magnetic fields can be
created by
nonsuperconducting currents. You can't get from a rail gun experiment
to all
of these bizarre ideas.
gharnagel wrote:Arindam gives details in his essays that are online.
Arindam Banerjee wrote:
Newton's laws of motion have been updated with the disovery of
electricity to begin with, and my rail gun experiments that follow.
Starting from 2015, when they denied it on flimsy grounds. However the
most recent experiments have kept them shut. At least they are not
accusing me of cheating, by making my hand push the armature!
That experriment throws out thermodynamics, relativity, and quantum.
Energy is constantly getting created and destroyed in our infinite
universe.
Actually, that's quantum field theory.
Really. Anyway quantum is bunkum. Just as relativity is depravity.
The world knows that, thanks to facebook, youtube, usenet and of course
directly from viewing by family and friends.
Your family and friends are creating and destroying energy?
The whole universe works on that line.
All those, such as below, can be easily accessed with some online
skills.
Searches on sci.physics will suffice.
https://www.facebook.com/100000534193755/videos/1238224284250354/
Cheers,
Arindam Banerjee
That video doesn't refute conventional physics.
Arindam was presenting the Eureka moment.
In fact, what you say
in the blurb with it paints you as a crackpot:
Or the greatest genius of all time who being so has to face opposition
from the powers that ve.
"Spacetime gets binned."
Well, that's fine with me, but I've seen no proff.
When inertia is out spacetime is out.
Arindam provides details in his links in sci.physics.
"The universe gets straightened out. It does not expand. It is infinite.
Infinite is fine with me also, but that doesn't refute expansion. You
must explain the red shift.
"No black holes but cold cores of stars that give up their bright
hydrogen
cover."
How long do you think it takes for a star to cool down?
"Which become nebulae."
That happens when stars explode.
"Then a cold core enters there to form a bright star once again in
trillion year cycles.
Not long enough. And where does this "cold core" come from?
it was cold
to begin with:
"The centre of stars and planets are not hot but immensely cold."
You're denying thermodynamics and heat transfer theory.
We are Arindam's ghostly cyberdogs and our claim is that we know fardefinitely not a
physicist.
"Superconducting currents create the magnetic field."
And where do these currents come from? And magnetic fields can be
created by
nonsuperconducting currents.
to all
of these bizarre ideas.
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 546 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 12:28:37 |
Calls: | 10,389 |
Calls today: | 4 |
Files: | 14,061 |
Messages: | 6,416,878 |
Posted today: | 1 |