Le 18/08/2024 ร 11:57, Thomas Heger a รฉcritย :
If you would encode time into the exchanged signal, you could compare
the local reading of your own clock (at -say- B in this case) with the
content of the code in the received message from A, if you add
delay(A->B) to t_A (which is encoded in the timing signal).
What you wrote is a fantasy of yours and has nothing to do with
Einstein's procedure which embed the delay in the two postulates he
stated (one is backed by experiments about round trip light propagation,
the other one is - partly - conventional).
On Sat, 17 Aug 2024 19:28:33 +0000, Maciej Wozniak wrote:
I've pointed directly 2 denying themself numeric predictions derivable
in the physics of your idiot guru. That's a proof of inconsistency
If there were such things, surely Wozniak could post them. He's been
asked to do so many times, but all that happens is unhinged ravings of
an undisciplined mind.
On Sun, 18 Aug 2024 4:03:02 +0000, Maciej Wozniak wrote:
W dniu 18.08.2024 oย 00:49, gharnagel pisze:
If there were such things, surely Wozniak could post them.
And I did, dosens of times.
If this were true, I surely would have seen it and remembered.
โThere are basically two groups of people. People who accomplish
things, and people who claim to have accomplished things.
The first group is less crowded.โ โ Mark Twain
If he would just post his "proof" one "more" time, it would prove that
he wasn't a liar. Obviously, he won't do it because it's nonexistent.
All he has posted is nebulous unconfirmed assertions which are in no way "proofs." So let's see these "proofs" again and clear the air.
On 2024-08-18 09:57:35 +0000, Thomas Heger said:
Relativity requires mutally symmetric methods. So if you synchronize
clock B with clock A, this must come to the same result, as if you
would synchronize clock A with clock B.
The method needs not be symmetric. It is sufficient that the result is. Perhaps a symmetric method would be better in some cases. A possible symmetric method is to use a signal source that is equally far from both clocks. The result of Einstein's method is symmetric in the sense that
if A is synchronized with B then B is synchornized with A.
On 8/17/2024 8:56 AM, Maciej Wozniak wrote:
Taking 2 identical pendulum clocks blows this pathetic bullshit out.Wrong. Two identical pendulum clocks, one on Earth, one on the moon,
wouldn't even be close to functioning identically. Two identical clocks,
one in zero gravity deep space the other on earth wouldn't function identically either, because the one in deep space wouldn't work at all. Meanwhile, two identical balance spring/electronic clocks would work identically, other than a tiny correction for different GR effects. This
is because the "identical" pendulum clocks are NOT identical in the
mentioned situations. "Planet not included."
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 546 |
Nodes: | 16 (0 / 16) |
Uptime: | 156:16:22 |
Calls: | 10,384 |
Calls today: | 1 |
Files: | 14,056 |
Messages: | 6,416,468 |