• Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)

    From Bertitaylor@21:1/5 to All on Tue Apr 1 23:48:09 2025
    XPost: sci.physics, sci.physics.relativity

    Seeing that everyone has taken advantage of common USAns, meaning the US fatcats and their allies abroad, there has to be a reaction. So, we have
    El Dictatore Presidente Trumpo. The voters wanted someone in charge who
    would look after their interests as opposed to everyone else's.

    A convicted felon with the morals of an alley cat was elected over a
    puppet hyaenawoman whom no one wanted.

    Sad it got to be this way. Democracy has got corrupted thanks to moral relativity and greed.

    As for Trump, he has declared to no more waste money on Ukraine and
    NATO. Savings there. No one can help in the Middle East. Best cut losses
    there too. As for tariffs they will bring taxes and create local
    employment that will employ genuine citizens. Further savings from
    Musk's Doge. Better social cohesion from abandoning weird social
    policies.

    Roachie you are as wrong as ever. How that is always so is a wonder.
    E=mcc crap surely makes for disastrous mislearned asses braying various nonsenses.

    Woof-woof woof woof woof-woof woof

    Bertietaylor

    --

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Thomas Heger@21:1/5 to All on Thu Apr 17 09:11:30 2025
    XPost: sci.physics, sci.physics.relativity

    Am Donnerstag000017, 17.04.2025 um 03:58 schrieb Physfitfreak:


    White House's "Office of Science and Technology Policy" director,
    Michael Kratsios, said this in a speech a couple days back in Austin:

    ย ย  "Our technologies permit us to manipulate time and space. They leave distance annihilated, cause things to grow, and improve productivity."



    I found this in a Telegram Russian news channel, then dug the source.
    The transcript of the speech is at

    https://www.whitehouse.gov/articles/2025/04/8716/


    This man is the "science advisor" of Trump.

    Are you thinking what I'm thinking?.. Trump was the other day saying he
    has weapons that nobody can imagine. Could it be that he told Trump the
    UFOs that were captured in the 1950s had creatures inside that are still teaching Pentagon how to build secret weapons?

    Who made this man "science advisor to the President"?.. Just last month!
    And as if that total waste of money wasn't enough, they made him also director of "White House Office of Science and Technology Policy". How
    many millions more waste per month is that one, you go find out.



    Most likely the 'UFOs' where invented by the Nazis in the 1930th.

    (You may call their crews 'creatures' anyhow).

    But the Nazis had also told the world a lot about their 'wonder-weapons'
    (ad nauseam).

    But even if they invented a lot, the promised miracles didn't happen and Nazi-Germany was in fact bombed into total destruction.

    Therefore, 'scientific hubris' isn't recommended and science should do,
    what science can do and should not announce progress, until that is
    already achieved.



    TH






    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bertitaylor@21:1/5 to Physfitfreak on Tue Apr 22 23:59:56 2025
    XPost: sci.physics, sci.physics.relativity

    On Tue, 22 Apr 2025 23:06:32 +0000, Physfitfreak wrote:




    "Technical talks" that were scheduled for tomorrow (Wednesday) has been postponed to Saturday concurrent with main talks.

    This shows how nothing has so far been determined. There wouldn't be any
    use for technical talks if the subject matter hasn't been determined.

    First the generalities, and only then the detail. Hehe :) Makes since? Discussing details of what when they don't even know what is agreed upon
    to discuss.

    So even the notion of it must've been just a gesture of ongoing talks
    after the initial turmoil in that 2nd round.

    I think this whole thing can collapse in just minutes. Nobody talks and negotiates with Devil. This is foul thinking from begin to end.

    I can't believe Israelis think Iranians are afraid of Americans going to
    a war with them. Iranians have expected it for 30 years! ..

    And they're prepared.

    It is you, the Israelis, who should be afraid of such coming war. You
    will not survive it.

    That may be, Roachie. Or may not be. But how does the poverty of Jim
    Pennino come into all that?

    --

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Thomas Heger@21:1/5 to All on Sat Apr 26 07:43:39 2025
    XPost: sci.physics, sci.physics.relativity

    Am Donnerstag000024, 24.04.2025 um 20:41 schrieb Physfitfreak:



    Americans words are so unreliable that 3rd talk might be the last, as I mentioned before.

    So Iran is now testing Europeans' degree of servitude towards USA in the light of recent tariff related development to see if in the absence of a
    deal with USA they could have a deal with Europeans, Russia, and China. Effectively replacing Americans with the Europeans.

    Europeans haven't responded yet.

    There are no 'Europeans'.

    Europe is a huge continent, which is populated by a large number of
    people, which live in a large number of nations.

    I, for instance, live in Germany.

    Germans are a crude mixture of all sort of tribes, which left their
    offspring in the region now called 'Germany'.

    A lot of these people had actually slavic roots, which are more or less
    more related to Polish or Russian people, while others stem from Romans
    and from kelts.

    That's why there is no consensus, how to deal with geopolitical
    problems, like e.g. the Ukraine conflict.

    But Germany is only one of a lot of countries, which all have their own interests, friends, demands and enemies.

    To bring this into a single consensus is like herding a flock of flees.

    That's why it takes some time.
    ...


    TH

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From bertietaylor@21:1/5 to Thomas Heger on Sat Apr 26 11:39:05 2025
    XPost: sci.physics, sci.physics.relativity

    On Sat, 26 Apr 2025 5:43:39 +0000, Thomas Heger wrote:

    Am Donnerstag000024, 24.04.2025 um 20:41 schrieb Physfitfreak:



    Americans words are so unreliable that 3rd talk might be the last, as I
    mentioned before.

    So Iran is now testing Europeans' degree of servitude towards USA in the
    light of recent tariff related development to see if in the absence of a
    deal with USA they could have a deal with Europeans, Russia, and China.
    Effectively replacing Americans with the Europeans.

    Europeans haven't responded yet.

    There are no 'Europeans'.

    Let us say if you are born or live permanently in Europe, you are an
    European.

    Europe is a huge continent, which is populated by a large number of
    people, which live in a large number of nations.

    I, for instance, live in Germany.

    You are a German.

    Germans are a crude mixture of all sort of tribes, which left their
    offspring in the region now called 'Germany'.

    So there are subsets of Germans.

    A lot of these people had actually slavic roots, which are more or less
    more related to Polish or Russian people, while others stem from Romans
    and from kelts.

    That's why there is no consensus, how to deal with geopolitical
    problems, like e.g. the Ukraine conflict.

    I suppose democracy is there to sort out this sort of thing. Provided it
    really works.

    But Germany is only one of a lot of countries, which all have their own interests, friends, demands and enemies.

    Germany is a subset of Europe.

    To bring this into a single consensus is like herding a flock of flees.

    Regret for lack of bigbossy Napoleon or Hitler, what.

    That's why it takes some time.

    Problem with democracy. Well known!

    Superpolitics - as conceived by Arindam - with direct democracy
    involving full voting by all legal entities, numbering in the hundreds
    of millions, on online platforms on various isses, will solve decision
    making comprehensively and efficiently. Perfectly possible now.
    Superpolitics involving databases and robots and computers will make all poltiicans obsolete.

    Woof woof woof woof

    Bertietaylor (Arindam Banerjee's celestial cyberdoggies)
    ....


    TH

    --

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bertitaylor@21:1/5 to All on Fri May 2 01:55:00 2025
    XPost: sci.physics, sci.physics.relativity

    Huh, Trump excels at getting bankrupt and coming back.

    When he declares US bankrupt bang will go the 34t debt. It will simply
    vanish like a bad dream. Like it never existed. Too bad for the
    investing fools.

    Because unlike indebted smalltimers no one can break the leg of the US
    for not coughing up. US can default with impunity. As a nation of
    thieves (as Arindam found out from his createspace experience) they will
    do just that with no qualms.

    Then what with tariffs and local production and no interest on debt
    payments he will Maga.

    Back with big smiles and baseball caps and hot dogs and comics and more
    lies to regain acceptability.

    WOOF woof woof woof-woof

    We bark to conquer.

    Bertietaylor

    --

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Thomas Heger@21:1/5 to All on Fri May 2 10:08:59 2025
    XPost: sci.physics, sci.physics.relativity

    Am Samstag000026, 26.04.2025 um 13:39 schrieb bertietaylor:
    On Sat, 26 Apr 2025 5:43:39 +0000, Thomas Heger wrote:

    Am Donnerstag000024, 24.04.2025 um 20:41 schrieb Physfitfreak:



    Americans words are so unreliable that 3rd talk might be the last, as I
    mentioned before.

    So Iran is now testing Europeans' degree of servitude towards USA in the >>> light of recent tariff related development to see if in the absence of a >>> deal with USA they could have a deal with Europeans, Russia, and China.
    Effectively replacing Americans with the Europeans.

    Europeans haven't responded yet.

    There are no 'Europeans'.

    Let us say if you are born or live permanently in Europe, you are an European.

    No.
    You were talking about ethnic relations with 'Europeans', while actually
    use geography to categorize people into 'tribes'.

    But there is or were no tribe or people called 'Europeans'.

    Europe is a huge continent and inhabited by tons of different tribes and nations.

    'European' could therefore only be an attribute used for citizenship.

    Since there exist a politician entity called 'European Union', it would
    be possible to call all citizens of all nations forming the EU 'Europeans'.

    But that is, of course, not correct, because there are some countries in Europe, which do not belong to the EU.

    So, 'European' could be used for people, who live in Europe at a certain
    time.

    That would be slightly closer, but would differ in the set of people,
    who were born in Europe, but do not live there anymore.

    So, all in all, 'European' cannot be defined properly, hence there does
    not exist any well defined set of people, you may rightfully call
    'Europeans'.




    Europe is a huge continent, which is populated by a large number of
    people, which live in a large number of nations.

    I, for instance, live in Germany.

    You are a German.

    'German' is actually Latin and means something like 'man with a spear'.

    The Romans called certain people 'Germanes' who didn't live in the
    region currently called Germany.

    The people named 'Teutones' and 'Angeln' settled in current Denmark.

    (Lower-) 'Saxons' settled in Germany, but also in other regions outside
    present Germany. But the current state of Saxony isn't the region where
    the ancient Saxons settled and the current Saxons are not related to the ancient Saxons.

    Germans call themselves 'Deutsche', which in not related to a region or
    an ethnic group, but to the language 'Deutsch' (=German).

    This language was widely spoken in many parts of Europe and was among
    the ancestors of Dutch and English, for instance.

    Now German is spoken mainly in Germany, Austria and Switzerland.


    TH

    ...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bertitaylor@21:1/5 to Thomas Heger on Sun May 4 13:31:58 2025
    XPost: sci.physics, sci.physics.relativity

    On Fri, 2 May 2025 8:08:59 +0000, Thomas Heger wrote:

    Am Samstag000026, 26.04.2025 um 13:39 schrieb bertietaylor:
    On Sat, 26 Apr 2025 5:43:39 +0000, Thomas Heger wrote:

    Am Donnerstag000024, 24.04.2025 um 20:41 schrieb Physfitfreak:



    Americans words are so unreliable that 3rd talk might be the last, as I >>>> mentioned before.

    So Iran is now testing Europeans' degree of servitude towards USA in the >>>> light of recent tariff related development to see if in the absence of a >>>> deal with USA they could have a deal with Europeans, Russia, and China. >>>> Effectively replacing Americans with the Europeans.

    Europeans haven't responded yet.

    There are no 'Europeans'.

    Let us say if you are born or live permanently in Europe, you are an
    European.

    No.
    You were talking about ethnic relations with 'Europeans', while actually
    use geography to categorize people into 'tribes'.

    We are tribal. Some are born to tribes and others get adopted. When
    there is too much love causing mixing among tribes then there comes
    castes, clans, bandits, loners, etc.

    But there is or were no tribe or people called 'Europeans'.

    Many tribes were there in European forming a superset of tribes that is
    called European. Much as snooty North and West Europeans may object such
    is the third world perspective.

    Europe is a huge continent and inhabited by tons of different tribes and nations.

    Yes.

    'European' could therefore only be an attribute used for citizenship.

    It relates to peoples and cultures relating to Europe.

    Since there exist a politician entity called 'European Union', it would
    be possible to call all citizens of all nations forming the EU
    'Europeans'.

    But that is, of course, not correct, because there are some countries in Europe, which do not belong to the EU.

    They choose to stay out to assert their nationality but from third world
    pov they are also European.

    So, 'European' could be used for people, who live in Europe at a certain time.

    That would be slightly closer, but would differ in the set of people,
    who were born in Europe, but do not live there anymore.

    So, all in all, 'European' cannot be defined properly, hence there does
    not exist any well defined set of people, you may rightfully call 'Europeans'.




    Europe is a huge continent, which is populated by a large number of
    people, which live in a large number of nations.

    I, for instance, live in Germany.

    You are a German.

    'German' is actually Latin and means something like 'man with a spear'.

    The Romans called certain people 'Germanes' who didn't live in the
    region currently called Germany.

    The people named 'Teutones' and 'Angeln' settled in current Denmark.

    (Lower-) 'Saxons' settled in Germany, but also in other regions outside present Germany. But the current state of Saxony isn't the region where
    the ancient Saxons settled and the current Saxons are not related to the ancient Saxons.

    Germans call themselves 'Deutsche', which in not related to a region or
    an ethnic group, but to the language 'Deutsch' (=German).

    This language was widely spoken in many parts of Europe and was among
    the ancestors of Dutch and English, for instance.

    Now German is spoken mainly in Germany, Austria and Switzerland.


    TH

    ....

    --

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bertitaylor@21:1/5 to All on Tue May 6 03:37:05 2025
    XPost: sci.physics, sci.physics.relativity

    Silly Roachie, the greatest Nazi Adolf Hitler thought Iranians were
    second rate Aryans, so Nazi material.

    WOOF woof-woof woof woof woof-woof

    Bertietaylor

    --

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Thomas Heger@21:1/5 to All on Tue May 6 10:17:31 2025
    XPost: sci.physics, sci.physics.relativity

    Am Sonntag000004, 04.05.2025 um 15:31 schrieb Bertitaylor:
    ..

    Europeans haven't responded yet.

    There are no 'Europeans'.

    Let us say if you are born or live permanently in Europe, you are an
    European.

    No.
    You were talking about ethnic relations with 'Europeans', while actually
    use geography to categorize people into 'tribes'.

    We are tribal. Some are born to tribes and others get adopted. When
    there is too much love causing mixing among tribes then there comes
    castes, clans, bandits, loners, etc.


    Possibly you belong to a tribe, live in a tent and eat your enemies.

    But I don't.

    'Tribes' is among the most stupidst concepts for life you could possibly
    have.

    But there is or were no tribe or people called 'Europeans'.

    Many tribes were there in European forming a superset of tribes that is called European. Much as snooty North and West Europeans may object such
    is the third world perspective.

    Europe is a huge continent and inhabited by tons of different tribes and
    nations.

    Yes.

    'European' could therefore only be an attribute used for citizenship.

    It relates to peoples and cultures relating to Europe.

    I'm not quite sure, what you are talking about.

    Culture is actually something local.

    E.g. the southern regions of Germany celebrates 'carneval' and do
    strange things in those day, which other 'tribes' of Germany don't
    understand.

    But 'southern Germany' is actually a geographic cathegory and is in no
    way related to ethnic groups.

    You can check that easily yourself, if you go to Collogne, for instance,
    at the day called 'Rosenmontag'.

    There you find all sorts of ethnicities doing realy strange stuff, which
    could bring you into mental health facilities in most parts of the world.



    Since there exist a politician entity called 'European Union', it would
    be possible to call all citizens of all nations forming the EU
    'Europeans'.

    But that is, of course, not correct, because there are some countries in
    Europe, which do not belong to the EU.

    They choose to stay out to assert their nationality but from third world
    pov they are also European.

    Culture should be undestood as local and relational phenomenon.

    For instance we had a specific culture in New York in the eighties. San Francisco had seen 'Hippies' in the sixties.

    Also 'Hooliganism' in England is a local cultur and in no way related to ethnicity, even if tribes are involved.

    But 'European' culture is pure nonsense, because Europe is way to large
    to be called 'local'.

    There are tons of countries, ethnic groups, tribal and local cultures, languages, types of society and political systems in Europe.

    Therefore there is no such thing as 'Europeans' or 'European tribalism'.


    ...


    TH

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bertitaylor@21:1/5 to Thomas Heger on Wed May 7 06:22:29 2025
    XPost: sci.physics, sci.physics.relativity

    On Tue, 6 May 2025 8:17:31 +0000, Thomas Heger wrote:

    Am Sonntag000004, 04.05.2025 um 15:31 schrieb Bertitaylor:
    ...

    Europeans haven't responded yet.

    There are no 'Europeans'.

    Let us say if you are born or live permanently in Europe, you are an
    European.

    No.
    You were talking about ethnic relations with 'Europeans', while actually >>> use geography to categorize people into 'tribes'.

    We are tribal. Some are born to tribes and others get adopted. When
    there is too much love causing mixing among tribes then there comes
    castes, clans, bandits, loners, etc.


    Possibly you belong to a tribe, live in a tent and eat your enemies.

    Wrong

    But I don't.

    You gas your enemies en masse?



    'Tribes' is among the most stupidst concepts for life you could possibly have.

    None more stupid conceptwise than the Germanic and North European tribes
    who are the most tribal going by their awesome Nazi racist theories and practices. Which are lies for aggrandization. The price for such
    tribalism has been heavy.

    But there is or were no tribe or people called 'Europeans'.

    Many tribes were there in European forming a superset of tribes that is
    called European. Much as snooty North and West Europeans may object such
    is the third world perspective.

    Europe is a huge continent and inhabited by tons of different tribes and >>> nations.

    Yes.

    'European' could therefore only be an attribute used for citizenship.

    It relates to peoples and cultures relating to Europe.

    I'm not quite sure, what you are talking about.

    Then you are thick.

    Culture is actually something local.

    You are thick.

    E.g. the southern regions of Germany celebrates 'carneval' and do
    strange things in those day, which other 'tribes' of Germany don't understand.

    Fatheaded response.

    But 'southern Germany' is actually a geographic cathegory and is in no
    way related to ethnic groups.

    Racism, arrogance and bigotry are their main culture. Which transcends
    local displays of so called culture.

    You can check that easily yourself, if you go to Collogne, for instance,
    at the day called 'Rosenmontag'.

    There you find all sorts of ethnicities doing realy strange stuff, which could bring you into mental health facilities in most parts of the
    world.



    Since there exist a politician entity called 'European Union', it would
    be possible to call all citizens of all nations forming the EU
    'Europeans'.

    But that is, of course, not correct, because there are some countries in >>> Europe, which do not belong to the EU.

    They choose to stay out to assert their nationality but from third world
    pov they are also European.

    Culture should be undestood as local and relational phenomenon.

    It has nothing to do with little peculiarities.

    For instance we had a specific culture in New York in the eighties. San Francisco had seen 'Hippies' in the sixties.

    Also 'Hooliganism' in England is a local cultur and in no way related to ethnicity, even if tribes are involved.

    Just

    But 'European' culture is pure nonsense, because Europe is way to large
    to be called 'local'.

    There are tons of countries, ethnic groups, tribal and local cultures, languages, types of society and political systems in Europe.

    Therefore there is no such thing as 'Europeans' or 'European tribalism'.

    There are arrogant racist and bigoted tribes with their own rather
    predictable tribal affiliations everywhere, including Europe.

    None more tribal than the European tribalist, for no other tribe has
    made racism and bigotry as their key culture, taught in universities and boosted by their leaders in their expansionist tribal goals.

    WOOF woof-woof woof woof-woof woof woof

    Bertietaylor


    ....


    TH

    --

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Thomas Heger@21:1/5 to All on Wed May 7 09:52:42 2025
    XPost: sci.physics, sci.physics.relativity

    Am Mittwoch000007, 07.05.2025 um 08:22 schrieb Bertitaylor:
    On Tue, 6 May 2025 8:17:31 +0000, Thomas Heger wrote:

    Am Sonntag000004, 04.05.2025 um 15:31 schrieb Bertitaylor:
    ...

    Europeans haven't responded yet.

    There are no 'Europeans'.

    Let us say if you are born or live permanently in Europe, you are an >>>>> European.

    No.
    You were talking about ethnic relations with 'Europeans', while
    actually
    use geography to categorize people into 'tribes'.

    We are tribal. Some are born to tribes and others get adopted. When
    there is too much love causing mixing among tribes then there comes
    castes, clans, bandits, loners, etc.


    Possibly you belong to a tribe, live in a tent and eat your enemies.

    Wrong

    But I don't.

    You gas your enemies en masse?
    NO, I have never gassed anybody.




    'Tribes' is among the most stupidst concepts for life you could possibly
    have.

    None more stupid conceptwise than the Germanic and North European tribes
    who are the most tribal going by their awesome Nazi racist theories and practices. Which are lies for aggrandization. The price for such
    tribalism has been heavy.


    Sure, there were tribes in ancient times, of course.

    But how would you define a tribe in modern terms?

    There were 'tribe revivals' in the 20th century.

    E.g. there have been 'Hippies', 'Mods' or 'Punks'.

    But those times are gone now and we have all sorts of influences all
    over the place.

    Sure, some have long hair or a scooter like from 'Quadrophenia'.

    But that is just something fashionbable and does not define tribes.

    Some sort of tribalism is still existing in 'Hooliganism' or in criminal
    gangs.

    But more or less these are very few examples of relatively small groups.


    ...

    TH

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bertitaylor@21:1/5 to Thomas Heger on Wed May 7 12:14:27 2025
    XPost: sci.physics, sci.physics.relativity

    On Wed, 7 May 2025 7:52:42 +0000, Thomas Heger wrote:

    Am Mittwoch000007, 07.05.2025 um 08:22 schrieb Bertitaylor:
    On Tue, 6 May 2025 8:17:31 +0000, Thomas Heger wrote:

    Am Sonntag000004, 04.05.2025 um 15:31 schrieb Bertitaylor:
    ...

    Europeans haven't responded yet.

    There are no 'Europeans'.

    Let us say if you are born or live permanently in Europe, you are an >>>>>> European.

    No.
    You were talking about ethnic relations with 'Europeans', while
    actually
    use geography to categorize people into 'tribes'.

    We are tribal. Some are born to tribes and others get adopted. When
    there is too much love causing mixing among tribes then there comes
    castes, clans, bandits, loners, etc.


    Possibly you belong to a tribe, live in a tent and eat your enemies.

    Wrong

    But I don't.

    You gas your enemies en masse?
    NO, I have never gassed anybody.

    Good.




    'Tribes' is among the most stupidst concepts for life you could possibly >>> have.

    None more stupid conceptwise than the Germanic and North European tribes
    who are the most tribal going by their awesome Nazi racist theories and
    practices. Which are lies for aggrandization. The price for such
    tribalism has been heavy.


    Sure, there were tribes in ancient times, of course.

    They still are.

    But how would you define a tribe in modern terms?

    A group composed of common atavistic tribal values relating to their superiority.

    There were 'tribe revivals' in the 20th century.

    E.g. there have been 'Hippies', 'Mods' or 'Punks'.

    Disoriented tribals. Real tribes relate to nationality. A nation is one
    big tribe, or superset of tribes. The nation is thus the updated concept
    of tribe.

    But those times are gone now and we have all sorts of influences all
    over the place.

    Sure, some have long hair or a scooter like from 'Quadrophenia'.

    But that is just something fashionbable and does not define tribes.

    Some sort of tribalism is still existing in 'Hooliganism' or in criminal gangs.

    But more or less these are very few examples of relatively small groups.


    ....

    TH

    --

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bertitaylor@21:1/5 to All on Wed May 7 13:22:04 2025
    XPost: sci.physics, sci.physics.relativity

    Woof woof Roachie you are a hoot.

    So far as Indo-Pak relations go:

    Pyar may hud say guzar jaana hai
    Maar dena hai tujhko ya mar jaana hai.

    In love we cross all limits.
    Kill, or die.

    Your love for Arindam is great, Roachie. Understandable. The impact of
    the saintly genius upon the crude barbarian has always been profound.

    WOOF woof-woof woof woof-woof woof

    Bertietaylor

    --

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bertitaylor@21:1/5 to Physfitfreak on Wed May 7 22:06:53 2025
    XPost: sci.physics, sci.physics.relativity

    On Wed, 7 May 2025 15:52:10 +0000, Physfitfreak wrote:

    On 5/7/25 8:22 AM, Bertitaylor wrote:
    Woof woof Roachie you are a hoot.

    So far as Indo-Pak relations go:

    Pyar may hud say guzar jaana hai
    Maar dena hai tujhko ya mar jaana hai.

    In love we cross all limits.
    Kill, or die.

    Your love for Arindam is great, Roachie. Understandable. The impact of
    the saintly genius upon the crude barbarian has always been profound.

    WOOF woof-woof woof woof-woof woof

    Bertietaylor





    Die and have it reported here. Krishna's wish should materialize.

    Dickhead Roachie, we are already long dead and cavorting on low Heaven
    while doing propaganda for immortal Arindam.

    Woof woof woof-woof woof woof-woof woof

    Bertietaylor (Arindam's celestial cyberdogs, pure souls)

    --

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bertitaylor@21:1/5 to Physfitfreak on Wed May 7 22:43:17 2025
    XPost: sci.physics, sci.physics.relativity

    On Wed, 7 May 2025 16:10:21 +0000, Physfitfreak wrote:

    On 5/7/25 10:52 AM, Physfitfreak wrote:
    On 5/7/25 8:22 AM, Bertitaylor wrote:
    Woof woof Roachie you are a hoot.

    So far as Indo-Pak relations go:

    Pyar may hud say guzar jaana hai
    Maar dena hai tujhko ya mar jaana hai.

    In love we cross all limits.
    Kill, or die.

    Your love for Arindam is great, Roachie. Understandable. The impact of
    the saintly genius upon the crude barbarian has always been profound.

    WOOF woof-woof woof woof-woof woof

    Bertietaylor





    Die and have it reported here. Krishna's wish should materialize.



    A suggestion. Go to a Pakestani controlled Mosque in Sydney and as one
    of them goes down for kneeling prostration (Sejdeh) of the prayer,
    perform the "beseeching gods and goddesses" Hindu practice on him.

    That will get you where I want. They'll be good Pakestanis, and you'll
    be a good Hindu!

    Dogs are not permitted in mosques, Roachie. Not even their spirits. All
    Muslims know this and that must be respected. But as a wannabe cryptojew
    you don't know that simple fact.

    WOOF woof-woof woof woof-woof woof

    Bertietaylor

    --

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Johnny LaRue@21:1/5 to Thomas Heger on Wed May 7 20:35:52 2025
    XPost: sci.physics, sci.physics.relativity

    In article <m80hnqFko8tU6@mid.individual.net>,
    Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> wrote:

    Sure, some have long hair or a scooter like from 'Quadrophenia'.

    Can you see the Real Me?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Thomas Heger@21:1/5 to All on Thu May 8 08:40:44 2025
    XPost: sci.physics, sci.physics.relativity

    Am Mittwoch000007, 07.05.2025 um 14:14 schrieb Bertitaylor:
    On Wed, 7 May 2025 7:52:42 +0000, Thomas Heger wrote:

    Am Mittwoch000007, 07.05.2025 um 08:22 schrieb Bertitaylor:
    On Tue, 6 May 2025 8:17:31 +0000, Thomas Heger wrote:

    Am Sonntag000004, 04.05.2025 um 15:31 schrieb Bertitaylor:
    ...

    Europeans haven't responded yet.

    There are no 'Europeans'.

    Let us say if you are born or live permanently in Europe, you are an >>>>>>> European.

    No.
    You were talking about ethnic relations with 'Europeans', while
    actually
    use geography to categorize people into 'tribes'.

    We are tribal. Some are born to tribes and others get adopted. When
    there is too much love causing mixing among tribes then there comes
    castes, clans, bandits, loners, etc.


    Possibly you belong to a tribe, live in a tent and eat your enemies.

    Wrong

    But I don't.

    You gas your enemies en masse?
    NO, I have never gassed anybody.

    Good.




    'Tribes' is among the most stupidst concepts for life you could
    possibly
    have.

    None more stupid conceptwise than the Germanic and North European tribes >>> who are the most tribal going by their awesome Nazi racist theories and
    practices. Which are lies for aggrandization. The price for such
    tribalism has been heavy.


    Sure, there were tribes in ancient times, of course.

    They still are.

    Aparently you regard yourself as a tribe member.

    Does your tribe have a name?

    And would you mind telling us this name?

    ...

    TH

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bertitaylor@21:1/5 to Thomas Heger on Thu May 8 07:40:07 2025
    XPost: sci.physics, sci.physics.relativity

    On Thu, 8 May 2025 6:40:44 +0000, Thomas Heger wrote:

    Am Mittwoch000007, 07.05.2025 um 14:14 schrieb Bertitaylor:
    On Wed, 7 May 2025 7:52:42 +0000, Thomas Heger wrote:

    Am Mittwoch000007, 07.05.2025 um 08:22 schrieb Bertitaylor:
    On Tue, 6 May 2025 8:17:31 +0000, Thomas Heger wrote:

    Am Sonntag000004, 04.05.2025 um 15:31 schrieb Bertitaylor:
    ...

    Europeans haven't responded yet.

    There are no 'Europeans'.

    Let us say if you are born or live permanently in Europe, you are an >>>>>>>> European.

    No.
    You were talking about ethnic relations with 'Europeans', while
    actually
    use geography to categorize people into 'tribes'.

    We are tribal. Some are born to tribes and others get adopted. When >>>>>> there is too much love causing mixing among tribes then there comes >>>>>> castes, clans, bandits, loners, etc.


    Possibly you belong to a tribe, live in a tent and eat your enemies.

    Wrong

    But I don't.

    You gas your enemies en masse?
    NO, I have never gassed anybody.

    Good.




    'Tribes' is among the most stupidst concepts for life you could
    possibly
    have.

    None more stupid conceptwise than the Germanic and North European tribes >>>> who are the most tribal going by their awesome Nazi racist theories and >>>> practices. Which are lies for aggrandization. The price for such
    tribalism has been heavy.


    Sure, there were tribes in ancient times, of course.

    They still are.

    Aparently you regard yourself as a tribe member.

    Yes, of pack led by Arindam.

    Does your tribe have a name?

    Depends on context, for Arindam. Basically for social and political
    purposes Bengali tribal affiliated with Indian and Australian tribes.
    Then professionally in the engineering tribe.

    And would you mind telling us this name?

    Bihari-Bengali-Soviet-Catholic-British-Indian-Audtralian... And many
    other tribal influences for Arindam. Makes him the greatest genius of
    all time and sole god among lotsa devils.

    WOOF woof-woof woof woof-woof woof

    Bertietaylor (Arindam's celestial cyberdogs)

    ....

    TH

    --

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Johnie Medved Schepatov@21:1/5 to Thomas Heger on Thu May 8 15:19:56 2025
    XPost: sci.physics.relativity

    Thomas Heger wrote:

    They still are.

    Aparently you regard yourself as a tribe member.

    Does your tribe have a name?

    And would you mind telling us this name?

    ...

    It was a BIG mistake by Russia to let the two German states reunite. Now
    they all are natzis, fucking natzis, nato alliance all natzis too, with a swastika as logo. What a fucking shame. This fucks are rewriting history
    as we speak.

    ๐—•๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—น๐—ถ๐—ป ๐—ฏ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐˜€ ๐—ฆ๐—ผ๐˜ƒ๐—ถ๐—ฒ๐˜ ๐—ณ๐—น๐—ฎ๐—ด๐˜€ ๐—ผ๐—ป 80๐˜๐—ต ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ป๐—ถ๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜€๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐˜† ๐—ผ๐—ณ ๐—ก๐—ฎ๐˜‡๐—ถ ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—ณ๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐˜
    The Russian embassy has condemned the ban as discriminatory and
    revisionist https://www.rt.com/news/617032-berlin-bans-soviet-flags-victory-day/

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From bertitaylor@21:1/5 to Physfitfreak on Fri May 9 05:09:44 2025
    XPost: sci.physics, sci.physics.relativity

    On Thu, 8 May 2025 17:32:01 +0000, Physfitfreak wrote:

    On 5/7/25 5:43 PM, Bertitaylor wrote:
    On Wed, 7 May 2025 16:10:21 +0000, Physfitfreak wrote:

    On 5/7/25 10:52 AM, Physfitfreak wrote:
    On 5/7/25 8:22 AM, Bertitaylor wrote:
    Woof woof Roachie you are a hoot.

    So far as Indo-Pak relations go:

    Pyar may hud say guzar jaana hai
    Maar dena hai tujhko ya mar jaana hai.

    In love we cross all limits.
    Kill, or die.

    Your love for Arindam is great, Roachie. Understandable. The impact of >>>>> the saintly genius upon the crude barbarian has always been profound. >>>>>
    WOOF woof-woof woof woof-woof woof

    Bertietaylor





    Die and have it reported here. Krishna's wish should materialize.



    A suggestion. Go to a Pakestani controlled Mosque in Sydney and as one
    of them goes down for kneeling prostration (Sejdeh) of the prayer,
    perform the "beseeching gods and goddesses" Hindu practice on him.

    That will get you where I want. They'll be good Pakestanis, and you'll
    be a good Hindu!

    Dogs are not permitted in mosques, Roachie. Not even their spirits. All
    Muslims know this and that must be respected. But as a wannabe cryptojew
    you don't know that simple fact.





    I know that "fact" but I oppose that because it is bogus. It is not part
    of Islam. It is inherited by pure ignorance from Talmud of Jews, and
    stands in conflict with genuine Islam.

    A lot of crap that only makes sense to tribal Jews were packed into
    Islam by ex-Jews who converted and right away began corrupting it.

    Islam itself is a clean, very thoughtful and advanced religion. Look at Houthis. It is coming from them. Look to what extent they do what they
    know is correct, and under what circumstances adhere to it. Compare
    Houthis to the Israelis to find out where Islam stands and where Jews'
    raised by "Talmud" are.

    Islam also has the seed to get more and more improved by itself. It
    demands it! Correct (and direct) reference to it shows it supports all animals and creatures in the world. It says animals cannot commit sin, therefore all animals go to Heaven. Which in every way that I look at
    it, is correct. At any level, and from any perspective. Human, on the
    other hand, is capable of committing sin, and therefore is a different
    story.

    Got it, Roachie. To the extent you are an ape, you are a Jewish
    cryptoMuslim playing "false flag" tricks to boost arms sales. Delighting
    in trouble, thus. Lies are what you are made of, so naturally you want straightforward truthful moral divines like Arindam dead.

    Anyway, we doggies are in Heaven, from whence we may return to Earth if
    the urge to sneakily eat real pizzas off the table becomes paramount. Or
    some other delightful mischief.

    Bad humans spend their time in Hell, then return to their mortal state
    in some less fortunate form. If they behave well, they go on to a more fortunate form,

    Islam peaked in the West centuries ago. Today the best Muslims are in
    India as they have been directly influenced by Hindus, positively.

    Woof woof woof woof woof

    Bertietaylor

    --

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Thomas Heger@21:1/5 to All on Fri May 9 07:27:56 2025
    XPost: sci.physics.relativity

    Am Donnerstag000008, 08.05.2025 um 17:19 schrieb Johnie Medved Schepatov:
    Thomas Heger wrote:

    They still are.

    Aparently you regard yourself as a tribe member.

    Does your tribe have a name?

    And would you mind telling us this name?

    ...

    It was a BIG mistake by Russia to let the two German states reunite. Now
    they all are natzis, fucking natzis, nato alliance all natzis too, with a swastika as logo. What a fucking shame. This fucks are rewriting history
    as we speak.

    Actually it wasn't Russia, who allowed German reunification.

    The country of that era was named 'CCCP' (aka 'Soviet Union').

    Gorbachev was then head of the state and wanted to reform the Soviet Union.

    He thought, that an end of communism in eastern Germany would be a god
    start.

    ๐—•๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—น๐—ถ๐—ป ๐—ฏ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐˜€ ๐—ฆ๐—ผ๐˜ƒ๐—ถ๐—ฒ๐˜ ๐—ณ๐—น๐—ฎ๐—ด๐˜€ ๐—ผ๐—ป 80๐˜๐—ต ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ป๐—ถ๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜€๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐˜† ๐—ผ๐—ณ ๐—ก๐—ฎ๐˜‡๐—ถ ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—ณ๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐˜
    The Russian embassy has condemned the ban as discriminatory and
    revisionist https://www.rt.com/news/617032-berlin-bans-soviet-flags-victory-day/

    Most Germans hate Naziism and like Russia. But what people like is
    irrelevant anyhow.


    Politics is a different story.

    German politicians are most likely handpicked by the former allies in WWII.


    TH

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Thomas Heger@21:1/5 to All on Fri May 9 08:34:56 2025
    XPost: sci.physics, sci.physics.relativity

    Am Mittwoch000007, 07.05.2025 um 14:14 schrieb Bertitaylor:
    .


    'Tribes' is among the most stupidst concepts for life you could
    possibly
    have.

    None more stupid conceptwise than the Germanic and North European tribes >>> who are the most tribal going by their awesome Nazi racist theories and
    practices. Which are lies for aggrandization. The price for such
    tribalism has been heavy.

    The inventor of 'scientific racism' was actually Charles Darwin and that
    an Englishman.


    Sure, there were tribes in ancient times, of course.

    They still are.

    But how would you define a tribe in modern terms?

    A group composed of common atavistic tribal values relating to their superiority.

    There were 'tribe revivals' in the 20th century.

    E.g. there have been 'Hippies', 'Mods' or 'Punks'.

    Disoriented tribals. Real tribes relate to nationality. A nation is one
    big tribe, or superset of tribes. The nation is thus the updated concept
    of tribe.

    No

    At least I don't like this interpretation of the word 'nation'.

    It is in common use in anglo-american media, however, but still wrong.

    E.g. they call Apaches (for instance) 'first nation'.

    That is racism and tribalism and by no means acceptable.


    Therefore 'nation' is another name for an independent state.

    To create a 'superset of tribes' as 'nation' and to identify this with
    the population of a country is simply unacceptable.

    In case of Germany this is also totally wrong, because the Germanic
    tribes were mainly not living in the area which is today occupied by
    Germany.


    TH

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bertitaylor@21:1/5 to Thomas Heger on Fri May 9 09:06:45 2025
    XPost: sci.physics, sci.physics.relativity

    On Fri, 9 May 2025 6:34:56 +0000, Thomas Heger wrote:

    Am Mittwoch000007, 07.05.2025 um 14:14 schrieb Bertitaylor:
    ..


    'Tribes' is among the most stupidst concepts for life you could
    possibly
    have.

    None more stupid conceptwise than the Germanic and North European tribes >>>> who are the most tribal going by their awesome Nazi racist theories and >>>> practices. Which are lies for aggrandization. The price for such
    tribalism has been heavy.

    The inventor of 'scientific racism' was actually Charles Darwin and that
    an Englishman.


    Sure, there were tribes in ancient times, of course.

    They still are.

    But how would you define a tribe in modern terms?

    A group composed of common atavistic tribal values relating to their
    superiority.

    There were 'tribe revivals' in the 20th century.

    E.g. there have been 'Hippies', 'Mods' or 'Punks'.

    Disoriented tribals. Real tribes relate to nationality. A nation is one
    big tribe, or superset of tribes. The nation is thus the updated concept
    of tribe.

    No

    At least I don't like this interpretation of the word 'nation'.

    Subjective.

    It is in common use in anglo-american media, however, but still wrong.

    For you.

    E.g. they call Apaches (for instance) 'first nation'.

    Because there were no other tribes in their areas.

    That is racism and tribalism and by no means acceptable.

    Nothing racist about it. Racism is saying my tribe is better because of
    ...


    Therefore 'nation' is another name for an independent state.

    An independent state could have a number of nations or tribes within it.

    To create a 'superset of tribes' as 'nation' and to identify this with
    the population of a country is simply unacceptable.

    Subjective petulance noted.

    In case of Germany this is also totally wrong, because the Germanic
    tribes were mainly not living in the area which is today occupied by
    Germany.

    Now those people who call themselves German form a superset of tribes
    that have speaking German as a binding factor.

    WOOF woof-woof woof woof woof-woof

    Bertietaylor


    TH

    --

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Kelley Balakirev@21:1/5 to Thomas Heger on Fri May 9 21:13:37 2025
    XPost: sci.physics.relativity

    Thomas Heger wrote:

    ๐—•๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—น๐—ถ๐—ป ๐—ฏ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐˜€ ๐—ฆ๐—ผ๐˜ƒ๐—ถ๐—ฒ๐˜ ๐—ณ๐—น๐—ฎ๐—ด๐˜€ ๐—ผ๐—ป 80๐˜๐—ต ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ป๐—ถ๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜€๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐˜† ๐—ผ๐—ณ ๐—ก๐—ฎ๐˜‡๐—ถ ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—ณ๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐˜
    The Russian embassy has condemned the ban as discriminatory and
    revisionist
    https://www.rt.com/news/617032-berlin-bans-soviet-flags-victory-day/

    Most Germans hate Naziism and like Russia. But what people like is
    irrelevant anyhow.

    I don't talk to jews, they are natzis. That's how they fool the world. Gay hitler was jew too. Take a look at their nato swastika, full natzis with
    no shame. I beg you to reconsider.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bertitaylor@21:1/5 to All on Sat May 10 02:39:56 2025
    XPost: sci.physics, sci.physics.relativity

    Stupid Roachie, Arindam is cosy and comfortable as an Aussie in
    Australia. Why on earth would he want to be a Houthi Muslim and be
    bombed by Trump? Do all the farting you can; your scope is limited.

    As for Pakistanis Arindam feels a bit sorry for the. Just a bit. For out
    of 400 missiles and drones they used to attack India not one got
    through. 0. Hai hai. Indian air defences are great
    Arindam pioneered them in the radar field, especially antennas, on
    1978-89. So really satisfied is he to see how his descendants there have
    done wonderfully.

    Now go hide under your flat stone, Roachie. Pray Trump does not step on
    it.

    WOOF woof-woof woof woof-woof

    --

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bertitaylor@21:1/5 to Physfitfreak on Sat May 10 04:49:44 2025
    XPost: sci.physics, sci.physics.relativity

    On Sat, 10 May 2025 3:37:09 +0000, Physfitfreak wrote:

    On 5/9/25 9:39 PM, Bertitaylor wrote:
    Arindam is cosy and comfortable as an Aussie in
    Australia.


    So is a worm inside shit.

    You have far to go to reach that cosy, comfy state, Roachie. Eat beans
    and fart. Height of your achievement!

    WOOF woof-woof woof woof-woof woof

    Bertietaylor

    --

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Thomas Heger@21:1/5 to All on Sat May 10 09:14:37 2025
    XPost: sci.physics, sci.physics.relativity

    Am Freitag000009, 09.05.2025 um 19:26 schrieb Physfitfreak:
    On 5/9/25 1:34 AM, Thomas Heger wrote:
    Am Mittwoch000007, 07.05.2025 um 14:14 schrieb Bertitaylor:
    .


    'Tribes' is among the most stupidst concepts for life you could
    possibly
    have.

    None more stupid conceptwise than the Germanic and North European
    tribes
    who are the most tribal going by their awesome Nazi racist theories
    and
    practices. Which are lies for aggrandization. The price for such
    tribalism has been heavy.

    The inventor of 'scientific racism' was actually Charles Darwin and
    that an Englishman.


    Sure, there were tribes in ancient times, of course.

    They still are.

    But how would you define a tribe in modern terms?

    A group composed of common atavistic tribal values relating to their
    superiority.

    There were 'tribe revivals' in the 20th century.

    E.g. there have been 'Hippies', 'Mods' or 'Punks'.

    Disoriented tribals. Real tribes relate to nationality. A nation is one
    big tribe, or superset of tribes. The nation is thus the updated concept >>> of tribe.

    No

    At least I don't like this interpretation of the word 'nation'.

    It is in common use in anglo-american media, however, but still wrong.

    E.g. they call Apaches (for instance) 'first nation'.

    That is racism and tribalism and by no means acceptable.


    Therefore 'nation' is another name for an independent state.

    To create a 'superset of tribes' as 'nation' and to identify this with
    the population of a country is simply unacceptable.

    In case of Germany this is also totally wrong, because the Germanic
    tribes were mainly not living in the area which is today occupied by
    Germany.


    TH



    Oh, now you go for changing the meaning of English terms to escape your
    ass.

    No.

    Actually we have the word 'Nation' in German, too, but with a different meaning.

    This is a common problem, because often words sound similar in other
    languages, even if their meaning is different.

    This problem has the name 'false friend'.

    Now 'nation' does not refer to tribes in German but to countries.

    Actually tribes are not a concept in modern societies. In anthropology
    they research tribes, of course. But modern societies do not know
    anything like that.

    (Actually some subcultures like hooligans or 'bikers' use tribalism for entertainment purposes.

    But that is more like a fashion in some subcultures.)


    TH

    ..

    TH

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Thomas Heger@21:1/5 to All on Sat May 10 09:07:11 2025
    XPost: sci.physics, sci.physics.relativity

    Am Freitag000009, 09.05.2025 um 11:06 schrieb Bertitaylor:
    On Fri, 9 May 2025 6:34:56 +0000, Thomas Heger wrote:

    Am Mittwoch000007, 07.05.2025 um 14:14 schrieb Bertitaylor:
    ..


    'Tribes' is among the most stupidst concepts for life you could
    possibly
    have.

    None more stupid conceptwise than the Germanic and North European
    tribes
    who are the most tribal going by their awesome Nazi racist theories
    and
    practices. Which are lies for aggrandization. The price for such
    tribalism has been heavy.

    The inventor of 'scientific racism' was actually Charles Darwin and that
    an Englishman.


    Sure, there were tribes in ancient times, of course.

    They still are.

    But how would you define a tribe in modern terms?

    A group composed of common atavistic tribal values relating to their
    superiority.

    There were 'tribe revivals' in the 20th century.

    E.g. there have been 'Hippies', 'Mods' or 'Punks'.

    Disoriented tribals. Real tribes relate to nationality. A nation is one
    big tribe, or superset of tribes. The nation is thus the updated concept >>> of tribe.

    No

    At least I don't like this interpretation of the word 'nation'.

    Subjective.

    It is in common use in anglo-american media, however, but still wrong.

    For you.

    E.g. they call Apaches (for instance) 'first nation'.

    Because there were no other tribes in their areas.

    That is racism and tribalism and by no means acceptable.

    Nothing racist about it. Racism is saying my tribe is better because of
    ...


    Therefore 'nation' is another name for an independent state.

    An independent state could have a number of nations or tribes within it.


    In Germany the smaller entities are called 'states' and the larger
    entity ('Germany') 'nation'.

    And neither states nor the nation are composed from tribes.

    Tribalism is a very odd concept in a modern society!

    Possibly there were tribes in existence several hundred or thousand
    years ago.

    But today we have nothing like that anymore in modern countries like
    e.g. Germany.

    In Papua New Guinea this might be different or possibly in the Amazonas
    area.

    But tribes in a modern city would be really strange.



    To create a 'superset of tribes' as 'nation' and to identify this with
    the population of a country is simply unacceptable.

    Subjective petulance noted.

    In case of Germany this is also totally wrong, because the Germanic
    tribes were mainly not living in the area which is today occupied by
    Germany.

    Now those people who call themselves German form a superset of tribes
    that have speaking German as a binding factor.

    Sure, language is a 'bindig factor'.

    But language does not follow ethnicity, because people speak what people
    speak in their environment.

    So: if you were born in Germany, you would speak German (at least
    somehow), because you certainly like to communicate with the people
    around you.

    So kids learn the language of their country, whether they are brown,
    yellow or pink.

    TH
    --

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bertitaylor@21:1/5 to Physfitfreak on Sat May 10 07:39:06 2025
    XPost: sci.physics, sci.physics.relativity

    On Sat, 10 May 2025 5:16:58 +0000, Physfitfreak wrote:

    On 5/9/25 11:49 PM, Bertitaylor wrote:
    On Sat, 10 May 2025 3:37:09 +0000, Physfitfreak wrote:

    On 5/9/25 9:39 PM, Bertitaylor wrote:
    ย Arindam is cosy and comfortable as an Aussie in
    Australia.


    So is a worm inside shit.

    You have far to go to reach that cosy, comfy state, Roachie. Eat beans
    and fart. Height of your achievement!









    But for that to happen you need to die first. Kill yourself. You're type
    1 autistic, prone to major depression. You can do that.

    Let us see. Arindam is asked to end by suicide his cosy comfy life in
    the lap of luxuries, surrounded by devoted family and friends, doing
    unmatched works of genius, enjoying thoroughly the grace of the Gods and Goddesses, so that some no-name cowardly worthless mischievous creature
    he never met can eat lots of beans and fart with satisfaction.

    Only the dumbest dickheaded dumbfuck could even hope for that to happen; unfortunately Roachie here may indeed be the smartest chap hailing from
    its peculiar Dumbfuckland. Now that is sad; shows the need for Empire to
    happen to elevate apes from absurd feudal-tribal theocracies causing Einsteinian states, that is, heads up their personal black holes.

    Woof woof woof woof-woof woof woof-woof

    Bertietaylor

    --

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bertitaylor@21:1/5 to Bertitaylor on Sat May 10 10:11:38 2025
    XPost: sci.physics, sci.physics.relativity

    On Fri, 9 May 2025 9:06:41 +0000, Bertitaylor wrote:

    On Fri, 9 May 2025 6:34:56 +0000, Thomas Heger wrote:

    Am Mittwoch000007, 07.05.2025 um 14:14 schrieb Bertitaylor:
    ..


    'Tribes' is among the most stupidst concepts for life you could
    possibly
    have.

    None more stupid conceptwise than the Germanic and North European tribes >>>>> who are the most tribal going by their awesome Nazi racist theories and >>>>> practices. Which are lies for aggrandization. The price for such
    tribalism has been heavy.

    The inventor of 'scientific racism' was actually Charles Darwin and that
    an Englishman.


    Sure, there were tribes in ancient times, of course.

    They still are.

    But how would you define a tribe in modern terms?

    A group composed of common atavistic tribal values relating to their
    superiority.

    Atavistic TRAITS and values, above

    One such trait for Europeans was getting so dazzled by the colour of
    their backsides that they considered all others without such colour to
    be inferior.





    There were 'tribe revivals' in the 20th century.

    E.g. there have been 'Hippies', 'Mods' or 'Punks'.

    Disoriented tribals. Real tribes relate to nationality. A nation is one
    big tribe, or superset of tribes. The nation is thus the updated concept >>> of tribe.

    No

    At least I don't like this interpretation of the word 'nation'.

    Subjective.

    It is in common use in anglo-american media, however, but still wrong.

    For you.

    E.g. they call Apaches (for instance) 'first nation'.

    Because there were no other tribes in their areas.

    That is racism and tribalism and by no means acceptable.

    Nothing racist about it. Racism is saying my tribe is better because of
    ....


    Therefore 'nation' is another name for an independent state.

    An independent state could have a number of nations or tribes within it.

    To create a 'superset of tribes' as 'nation' and to identify this with
    the population of a country is simply unacceptable.

    Subjective petulance noted.

    In case of Germany this is also totally wrong, because the Germanic
    tribes were mainly not living in the area which is today occupied by
    Germany.

    Now those people who call themselves German form a superset of tribes
    that have speaking German as a binding factor.

    WOOF woof-woof woof woof woof-woof

    Bertietaylor


    TH

    --

    --

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Larkin Hadonov@21:1/5 to Thomas Heger on Sat May 10 20:17:46 2025
    XPost: sci.physics.relativity

    Thomas Heger wrote:

    Oh, now you go for changing the meaning of English terms to escape your
    ass.

    No. Actually we have the word 'Nation' in German, too, but with a
    different meaning.
    This is a common problem, because often words sound similar in other languages, even if their meaning is different.

    i can't stop laughing, my friend

    ๐—™๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด๐—ฒ๐—ฟ ๐—–๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ฑ๐—ผ๐—บ๐˜€ ๐—™๐—ผ๐—ฟ ๐—–๐—ผ๐˜ƒ๐—ถ๐—ฑ
    https://bi%74%63%68%75te.com/v%69%64%65o/19LO0M36sjew

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bertitaylor@21:1/5 to Physfitfreak on Sat May 10 21:58:03 2025
    XPost: sci.physics, sci.physics.relativity

    On Sat, 10 May 2025 15:20:20 +0000, Physfitfreak wrote:

    n 5/10/25 2:39 AM, Bertitaylor wrote:
    On Sat, 10 May 2025 5:16:58 +0000, Physfitfreak wrote:

    On 5/9/25 11:49 PM, Bertitaylor wrote:
    On Sat, 10 May 2025 3:37:09 +0000, Physfitfreak wrote:

    On 5/9/25 9:39 PM, Bertitaylor wrote:
    ย Arindam is cosy and comfortable as an Aussie in
    Australia.


    So is a worm inside shit.

    You have far to go to reach that cosy, comfy state, Roachie. Eat beans >>>> and fart. Height of your achievement!









    But for that to happen you need to die first. Kill yourself. You're type >>> 1 autistic, prone to major depression. You can do that.

    Let us see. Arindam is asked to end by suicide his cosy comfy life in
    the lap of luxuries, surrounded by devoted family and friends, doing
    unmatched works of genius, enjoying thoroughly the grace of the Gods and
    Goddesses, so that some no-name cowardly worthless mischievous creature
    he never metย  can eat lots of beans and fart with satisfaction.

    Only the dumbest dickheaded dumbfuck could even hope for that to happen;
    unfortunately Roachie here may indeed be the smartest chap hailing from
    its peculiar Dumbfuckland. Now that is sad; shows the need for Empire to
    happen to elevate apes from absurd feudal-tribal theocracies causing
    Einsteinian states, that is, heads up their personal black holes.




    Yes, it sounds like you're close to that act indeed. Die. Get it over
    with.

    It will be a good end for you. You gave your useless dick to the late
    Ben Nino, why not the rest of you to your friends, the worms? Krishna
    wants that to happen. In body, you'll give yourself to other worms, and
    in spirit you'll get farted out.

    We are already dead to the evil world, and enjoying in low Heaven.

    Stupid roach Roachie is too thick to grasp this simple point.

    Some apes are beyond redemption.

    WOOF woof-woof woof woof woof-woof

    Bertietaylor (Arindam's celestial cyberdogs)

    --

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)