On 4/10/25 2:20 AM, J. J. Lodder wrote:
The Universe is not an evolved biologcal system.
Jan
How do you know that? How can one state that as fact without having the
means to check it?
On 04/10/2025 01:32 PM, J. J. Lodder wrote:
Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> wrote:
On 4/10/25 2:20 AM, J. J. Lodder wrote:
The Universe is not an evolved biologcal system.
Jan
How do you know that? How can one state that as fact without having the
means to check it?
Ockham told me.
Jan
Neither "Gaia Hypothesis" nor "Dumb Rock" are any more
falsifiable than "Big Bang" or "Steady State", which aren't.
Ockhamites are by no means the prevalent school,
though, it's popular with shallow inconstant sorts.
Do you, uh, believe everything Ockham says?
On 4/10/25 14:06, Ross Finlayson wrote:
On 04/10/2025 01:32 PM, J. J. Lodder wrote:
Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> wrote:
On 4/10/25 2:20 AM, J. J. Lodder wrote:
The Universe is not an evolved biologcal system.
Jan
How do you know that? How can one state that as fact without having the >>>> means to check it?
Ockham told me.
Jan
Neither "Gaia Hypothesis" nor "Dumb Rock" are any more
falsifiable than "Big Bang" or "Steady State", which aren't.
Ockhamites are by no means the prevalent school,
though, it's popular with shallow inconstant sorts.
Do you, uh, believe everything Ockham says?
You know if words do not have meaning than the
words 'true' or 'false' do not have meaning.
Do 'true' ideas have any greater value than
'false' ideas? Well if those words are meaningless
then maybe not.
The Starmaker wrote:
The Starmaker wrote:
The Starmaker wrote:
Stephen Hawking once asked:
Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing?
If Stephen Hawking would like an answer
to that question, has he ever consider
asking a woman that question?
I don't mean a woman scientist..
i mean, just any woman.
Where did Stephen Hawking get the idea he is
entitled to know the answer?
Is he Moses?
I was under the impression that Stephen Hawking was an atheist.
But he refers to the universe as a person, a being, a self that feels "bother"..
Why is Stephen Hawking soooo bothered by a bothered universe?
Mother Nature?
Is something bothering her?
Yous science guys make no sense...
It appears that both Einstein and Hawking are using Philosophy (bother)
to try
to understand the universe...
and that the universe is some hot and bothered irrational woman.
Yous science people are certaintly not going to get the answers by being ...rational.
put on a dress, some lipstick and walk the streets at night.
On 4/10/25 3:32 PM, J. J. Lodder wrote:
Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> wrote:
On 4/10/25 2:20 AM, J. J. Lodder wrote:
The Universe is not an evolved biologcal system.
Jan
How do you know that? How can one state that as fact without having the
means to check it?
Ockham told me.
Jan
Hmm.. Ockham didn't tell you Einstein wrote that letter of
recommendation himself?
The Starmaker wrote:
The Starmaker wrote:
The Starmaker wrote:
The Starmaker wrote:
Stephen Hawking once asked:
Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing?
If Stephen Hawking would like an answer
to that question, has he ever consider
asking a woman that question?
I don't mean a woman scientist..
i mean, just any woman.
Where did Stephen Hawking get the idea he is
entitled to know the answer?
Is he Moses?
I was under the impression that Stephen Hawking was an atheist.
But he refers to the universe as a person, a being, a self that feels "bother"..
Why is Stephen Hawking soooo bothered by a bothered universe?
Mother Nature?
Is something bothering her?
Yous science guys make no sense...
It appears that both Einstein and Hawking are using Philosophy (bother) to try
to understand the universe...
and that the universe is some hot and bothered irrational woman.
Yous science people are certaintly not going to get the answers by being ...rational.
put on a dress, some lipstick and walk the streets at night.
Okay, I see yous people have not clue (including Stephen Hawking)...
Stephen Hawking is searching for a 'rational' answer...
Clue number one: The universe isn't 'bothered'..
the reason Why numbers don't exist is because the universe is neither ratioanl or irrational.
Imaginay numbers.
Logic gots nothing to do with it.
The Universe 'simply' is ...unaware.
So, the universe is not 'bothered'.
It has absolutely has no awareness you are here.
And, (ask the math girls) there are no real numbers in a universe that is neither rational nor irrational.
Look up there in the universe, (my gawd it's filled with rocks!) you see a lot of 'rocks'..
rocks are neither rational nor irrational...
they are not even ...bothered at all.
Why does the rock go to all the bother of existing? Answer: No bother at all. It's just...there.
The Starmaker wrote:
The Starmaker wrote:
The Starmaker wrote:
The Starmaker wrote:
The Starmaker wrote:
Stephen Hawking once asked:
Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing?
If Stephen Hawking would like an answer
to that question, has he ever consider
asking a woman that question?
I don't mean a woman scientist..
i mean, just any woman.
Where did Stephen Hawking get the idea he is
entitled to know the answer?
Is he Moses?
I was under the impression that Stephen Hawking was an atheist.
But he refers to the universe as a person, a being, a self that feels >> > > > "bother"..
Why is Stephen Hawking soooo bothered by a bothered universe?
Mother Nature?
Is something bothering her?
Yous science guys make no sense...
It appears that both Einstein and Hawking are using Philosophy (bother) >> > > to try
to understand the universe...
and that the universe is some hot and bothered irrational woman.
Yous science people are certaintly not going to get the answers by being >> > > ...rational.
put on a dress, some lipstick and walk the streets at night.
Okay, I see yous people have not clue (including Stephen Hawking)...
Stephen Hawking is searching for a 'rational' answer...
Clue number one: The universe isn't 'bothered'..
the reason Why numbers don't exist is because the universe is neither ratioanl or irrational.
Imaginay numbers.
Logic gots nothing to do with it.
The Universe 'simply' is ...unaware.
So, the universe is not 'bothered'.
It has absolutely has no awareness you are here.
And, (ask the math girls) there are no real numbers in a universe that is neither rational nor irrational.
Look up there in the universe, (my gawd it's filled with rocks!) you see a lot of 'rocks'..
rocks are neither rational nor irrational...
they are not even ...bothered at all.
Why does the rock go to all the bother of existing? Answer: No bother at all. It's just...there.
In a nutshell
there are no real numbers
there are no laws of physics
there are no flying saucers
from other space
there is no life on other
planets in the universe..
there is no God
or anything with
any awareness at all.
It's just...You here.
On Sun, 13 Apr 2025 12:17:22 -0700, The Starmaker
<starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
The Starmaker wrote:
The Starmaker wrote:
The Starmaker wrote:
The Starmaker wrote:
The Starmaker wrote:
Stephen Hawking once asked:
Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing?
If Stephen Hawking would like an answer
to that question, has he ever consider
asking a woman that question?
I don't mean a woman scientist..
i mean, just any woman.
Where did Stephen Hawking get the idea he is
entitled to know the answer?
Is he Moses?
I was under the impression that Stephen Hawking was an atheist.
But he refers to the universe as a person, a being, a self that feels
"bother"..
Why is Stephen Hawking soooo bothered by a bothered universe?
Mother Nature?
Is something bothering her?
Yous science guys make no sense...
It appears that both Einstein and Hawking are using Philosophy (bother)
to try
to understand the universe...
and that the universe is some hot and bothered irrational woman.
Yous science people are certaintly not going to get the answers by being
...rational.
put on a dress, some lipstick and walk the streets at night.
Okay, I see yous people have not clue (including Stephen Hawking)...
Stephen Hawking is searching for a 'rational' answer...
Clue number one: The universe isn't 'bothered'..
the reason Why numbers don't exist is because the universe is neither ratioanl or irrational.
Imaginay numbers.
Logic gots nothing to do with it.
The Universe 'simply' is ...unaware.
So, the universe is not 'bothered'.
It has absolutely has no awareness you are here.
And, (ask the math girls) there are no real numbers in a universe that is neither rational nor irrational.
Look up there in the universe, (my gawd it's filled with rocks!) you see a lot of 'rocks'..
rocks are neither rational nor irrational...
they are not even ...bothered at all.
Why does the rock go to all the bother of existing? Answer: No bother at all. It's just...there.
In a nutshell
there are no real numbers
there are no laws of physics
there are no flying saucers
from other space
there is no life on other
planets in the universe..
there is no God
or anything with
any awareness at all.
It's just...You here.
Nobody knows you're here.
You don't know what are you doing here?
You don't know what's going on here?
You don't even know who you are anyway?
You don't know Where you are?
You don't know What you are?
You don't know Who you are?
None of yous knows who you are.
Yous have no memory.
No knowledge of what went before.
No understanding of what is now.
No knowledge of what will be.
How long you we be here?
You are all insane.
I want everybody out...Now!
Now, get off my fucking planet!
That's right!
MY Fucking Planet!
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 546 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 52:23:29 |
| Calls: | 10,397 |
| Calls today: | 5 |
| Files: | 14,067 |
| Messages: | 6,417,381 |
| Posted today: | 1 |