• Re: Acceleration.

    From Delbert Xuan Chou@21:1/5 to Jim Pennino on Sat Apr 19 11:34:55 2025
    XPost: sci.physics.relativity

    Jim Pennino wrote:

    In sci.physics Bertitaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
    Wow you guys are so thoroughly wrongly educated about the fundamentals
    of physics.

    Acceleration is the first derivative of velocity with respect to time
    and velocity is the first derivative of position with respect to time.

    Trivial.

    you have to pay attention, me friend, the acceleration is a derivative of
    a derivative, which is a 2. order derivative, and not a derivative two
    times. Here more proofs, for you to undrestand

    *_Playing with Holy Fire: Moldova launches a war on Christians_*
    *_to please its EU overlords_* https://www.r%74.com/news/615946-moldova-orthodox-church-detained/

    *_EU ignores ‘shocking’ treatment of Moldovan church – opposition MP_* https://www.r%74.com/ru%73%73%69a/615980-tauber-sandu-moldovan-church/

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Royce Belousov Hui@21:1/5 to Jim Pennino on Sat Apr 19 15:07:30 2025
    XPost: sci.physics.relativity

    Jim Pennino wrote:

    Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> wrote:
    Haven't you even heard that there is no acceleration for free falling
    objects?

    No, not from anyone sane.

    <snip remaining gibberish>

    there is no force applied, me frendo, the newtone was a fool, an idiot. He
    made shit up as he went along, back in his garden, to take a shit

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)