n sci.physics Bertitaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
Arindam remembers his father wondering after watching the Apollo moon
landing video in 1969, why they did not jump up at least three feet. He
also thought they could at least have thrown a stone up and thus show
it falling slowly.
There was the dropped hammer and feather experiment performed by Apollo
15 astronaut David Scott.
Bertitaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
Har har har har. Worthy objections if they were shuffling under piano
wires on Earth, with threat of them coming undone. But on the Moon they
would go up slowly and come down slowly with no damage done. And
nothing prevented them from throwing one of the moon rocks up to show
how slowly it went up or down.
They were intelligent professionals, not teenagers making an internet
video, crackpot.
Nothing about the Moon says "they would go up slowly" nor that the suits wouldn't be damaged by a fall, crackpot.
Explain the infamous conference of Neil Armstrong, Aldrin and Collins,
where they looked like dead inside. They didn't even smile once, and the guilt and shame was all over them. Why did this happen for more than 2
hours,
By far, not the happiest men in the world, having conquered the Moon,
isn't it?
Apollo 11 Post Flight Press Conference (1969)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hvg5UBdiIHs
Given the tens of thousands who built the vehicle, the tens of thousands
who saw its takeoff with their own eyes, the tracking of the vehicle by various countries and even amateurs, the thought that people would be
crazy enough to say "this didn't happen", simply didn't occur.
Am Montag000009, 09.06.2025 um 02:11 schrieb rhertz:
Explain the infamous conference of Neil Armstrong, Aldrin and Collins,
where they looked like dead inside. They didn't even smile once, and the
guilt and shame was all over them. Why did this happen for more than 2
hours,
By far, not the happiest men in the world, having conquered the Moon,
isn't it?
Apollo 11 Post Flight Press Conference (1969)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hvg5UBdiIHs
I actually like 'symbolism'.
Not for myself, of course, but because the 'bad guys' do and I'm good in deciphering symbols.
Now, that video started with two batches at the wall of the press
conference room:
one for 'NASA' and one for the 'Apollo 11 mission'.
The second logo showed an Eagle landing on the Moon.
Now the eagle is actually a symbol, because it is not a common eagle,
but the American white-head eagle.
'white head' in German means 'Weiรhaupt'.
That was actually a name in German, of a person who happened to be the
head of a group called 'Illuminati', who allegedly went to America
(after being prosecuted in Europe).
This Adam Weiรhaupt allegedly changed his name in the states and later called himself 'George Washington'.
TH
In sci.physics bertitaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
Hopping was possible with cranes, piano wires, etc. Jumping up say six
feet and coming down slowly would have not been easy, back in 1969.
All crackpot nonsense.
The people that built Apollo used real science so of course it all
worked, unlike crackpot, pipe roller science.
And even that would not be sufficient, because they wanted to match the
exact orbit and make a 'rendezvous' with the command module.
This would be extremely difficult, even if assisted by a large crew in a ground station. But actually it happened literally 'in the middle of nowhere'.
Einstein didn't make relativity famous. Relativity made Einstein
famous.
Explain the infamous conference of Neil Armstrong, Aldrin and Collins,
where they looked like dead inside. They didn't even smile once, and the guilt and shame was all over them. Why did this happen for more than 2
hours,
By far, not the happiest men in the world, having conquered the Moon,
isn't it?
Apollo 11 Post Flight Press Conference (1969)The usual "skeptic" is someone who defends the consensus of
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hvg5UBdiIHs
On Mon, 9 Jun 2025 0:11:55 +0000, rhertz wrote:
Explain the infamous conference of Neil Armstrong, Aldrin and Collins,The usual "skeptic" is someone who defends the consensus of
where they looked like dead inside. They didn't even smile once, and the
guilt and shame was all over them. Why did this happen for more than 2
hours,
By far, not the happiest men in the world, having conquered the Moon,
isn't it?
Apollo 11 Post Flight Press Conference (1969)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hvg5UBdiIHs
professionals by means of an either-or dichotomy between "science" and "pseudoscience" relying on appeal to "authority" while ridiculing
critics. It's lucky the moon landings succeeded if they tried to rely on relativity!
But there is no such animal as curved spacetime.
There is appearance of such with Earth's movement. Like a straight going
wave or particle will have to look bent from the moving platform that is Earth. That leads to weird stuff like GR which implicitly assumed the nonsenses of SR such as mass energy equivalence.
Bertitaylor wrote:
But there is no such animal as curved spacetime.
There is appearance of such with Earth's movement. Like a straight going
wave or particle will have to look bent from the moving platform that is
Earth. That leads to weird stuff like GR which implicitly assumed the
nonsenses of SR such as mass energy equivalence.
same way there is no straight line in empty space.
international jew.
mass. You dont undrestand tensors very much.
same way there is no straight line in empty space.
There are straight lines everywhere in the universe. Putting things
straight is Arindam's job.
You are the international jew.
No hellhound you are a super duper Jew sucking Einstein's. We are heavenhounds barking for Arindam's wonderful physics which throws out
the nonsenses rotting brains.
Bertitaylor wrote:
same way there is no straight line in empty space.
There are straight lines everywhere in the universe. Putting things
straight is Arindam's job.
illucid. I give you an empty spacetime, vacuum or nat, show me that
straight line. You certainly dont undrestand tensors
You are the international jew.
No hellhound you are a super duper Jew sucking Einstein's. We are
heavenhounds barking for Arindam's wonderful physics which throws out
the nonsenses rotting brains.
you are a Hitlerjugend (the young), all jews, international.
On Sat, 28 Jun 2025 12:31:41 +0000, Oleg Tzeboev wrote:
illucid. I give you an empty spacetime, vacuum or nat, show me that
straight line. You certainly dont undrestand tensors
No such animal as spacetime. Back in early 20th century they had no clue about radiation and phase, so they made up various nonsenses like
quantum and simultaneity and throw them around. No one knew what all
that meant. They still don't, silly apes that they are.
you are a Hitlerjugend (the young), all jews, international.
You are an idiot. Now fuck off.
Bertitaylor wrote:น_๐๐ฟ๐๐๐ต
On Sat, 28 Jun 2025 12:31:41 +0000, Oleg Tzeboev wrote:
illucid. I give you an empty spacetime, vacuum or nat, show me that
straight line. You certainly dont undrestand tensors
No such animal as spacetime. Back in early 20th century they had no clue
about radiation and phase, so they made up various nonsenses like
quantum and simultaneity and throw them around. No one knew what all
that meant. They still don't, silly apes that they are.
you are a Hitlerjugend (the young), all jews, international.
You are an idiot. Now fuck off.
you stupid khazar goy, you dont undrestand physics at all. What you do
is
wank.
๐ฆ๐ผ๐บ๐ฒ๐๐ถ๐บ๐ฒ๐_๐๐ผ๐_๐ต๐ฎ๐๐ฒ_๐๐ผ_๐๐ถ๐ฒ๐_๐๐ต๐ถ๐ป๐ด๐_๐ณ๐ฟ๐ผ๐บ_๐ฎ_๐ฑ๐ถ๐๐๐ฎ๐ป๐ฐ๐ฒ_๐ถ๐ป_๐ผ๐ฟ๐ฑ๐ฒ๐ฟ_๐๐ผ_๐๐ฒ๐ฒ_๐๐ต๐ฒ_๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ฎ๐
https://bitchute.com/video/iQUuy80LOLwZ
That is true so follow Arindam if there is anything truthful about you.
For Arindam is Pure Truth. Nothing Jewish about him. As things are you
are stupid wrong and disrespectful. So we told you to fuck off as we
don't think you are capable of improving.
Bertietaylor
https://bitchute.com/video/iQUuy80LOLwZ
On 7/3/2025 12:09 PM, Luther Makhmutov wrote:
Bertitaylor wrote:
That is true so follow Arindam if there is anything truthful about you.
For Arindam is Pure Truth. Nothing Jewish about him. As things are you
are stupid wrong and disrespectful. So we told you to fuck off as we
don't think you are capable of improving.
Bertietaylor
https://bitchute.com/video/iQUuy80LOLwZ
you uneducated sack of shit, wannabe physicist, you forgot you have to
show a straight line in space,
fucking stupid, same thing with the curvature of spacetime.
Kind of reminds of this:
https://youtu.be/D3GVVkPb3OI
Kind of reminds of this:
https://youtu.be/D3GVVkPb3OI
On 7/3/2025 4:11 PM, Bertitaylor wrote:
On Thu, 3 Jul 2025 21:28:06 +0000, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
On 7/3/2025 12:09 PM, Luther Makhmutov wrote:
Bertitaylor wrote:
That is true so follow Arindam if there is anything truthful about you. >>>>> For Arindam is Pure Truth. Nothing Jewish about him. As things are you >>>>> are stupid wrong and disrespectful. So we told you to fuck off as we >>>>> don't think you are capable of improving.
Bertietaylor
https://bitchute.com/video/iQUuy80LOLwZ
you uneducated sack of shit, wannabe physicist, you forgot you have to >>>> show a straight line in space,
Idiot, there is such a thing as a ruler. The ends point out a straight
line.
spacetime, vacuum and so on. You cant,
fucking stupid, same thing with the curvature of spacetime.
Disgusting cretin, you hate Jews but grovel before their nonsense
notions.
Not exactly sure what you mean?
While they have their uses, you have none so fuck off.
WOOF woof-woof woof woof-woof woof
Bertietaylor
Kind of reminds of this:
https://youtu.be/D3GVVkPb3OI
--
On 7/4/2025 2:31 PM, Anderw Bakadorov wrote:
Bertitaylor wrote:
Kind of reminds of this:
https://youtu.be/D3GVVkPb3OI
completely nonsense, that's a representation, not lines in specetiem.
Kiss my ass.
Huh? I posted the link, not Bertitaylor. Did you doctor the response?
Can a straight line be a circle? No, but can it look like one? Yes.
A line in spacetime? The closest thing I can think of is think of is two objects connected by a cord, a very short cord. When its at full
tension, it might look like a line?
Am Samstag000014, 14.06.2025 um 06:17 schrieb LaurenceClarkCrossen:
On Mon, 9 Jun 2025 0:11:55 +0000, rhertz wrote:
Explain the infamous conference of Neil Armstrong, Aldrin and Collins,The usual "skeptic" is someone who defends the consensus of
where they looked like dead inside. They didn't even smile once, and the >>> guilt and shame was all over them. Why did this happen for more than 2
hours,
By far, not the happiest men in the world, having conquered the Moon,
isn't it?
Apollo 11 Post Flight Press Conference (1969)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hvg5UBdiIHs
professionals by means of an either-or dichotomy between "science" and
"pseudoscience" relying on appeal to "authority" while ridiculing
critics. It's lucky the moon landings succeeded if they tried to rely on
relativity!
The 'usual skeptic' would look at the 'body language' of these heros.
They didn't look very pleased, for instance, while being honored by
standing ovations.
Those were, apparently, 'orchestrated' by these guys sitting in the
middle of the audience.
But some sort of positive emotions would be a natural reaction to that
kind of applause.
But that didn't happen. Instead of smiling and grinning, the astronauts
bowed their heads down, what is not the usual sign for good feelings.
TH
On Sat, 7 Jun 2025 22:23:09 +0000, Bertitaylor wrote:
Arindam remembers his father wondering after watching the Apollo moon
landing video in 1969, why they did not jump up at least three feet. He
also thought they could at least have thrown a stone up and thus show
it falling slowly. Apes were so naive then and are still so gullible
now.
"When will they ever learn?" Bob Dylan??
knowing differences in representation and the object being represented.
Its odd because that implies that drawing a line on a piece of paper,
well, its not actually straight?
Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
knowing differences in representation and the object being
represented.
Its odd because that implies that drawing a line on a piece of paper,
well, its not actually straight?
you may ๐๐จ๐จ๐ช๐ข๐ the graphite on that piece of paper ๐ง๐๐ฅ๐ง๐๐จ๐๐ฃ๐ฉ๐จ a
straight line.
I hope that the straightedge would help out here? ;^)
Am Mittwoch000016, 16.07.2025 um 14:04 schrieb Peter Moylan:
Over such a long distance, bandwidth is a problem. You can deal with
this by deliberately cutting out some of the information, e.g. some of
the colour information. Alternatively, you can try to transmit a full-
colour picture, and let the gods of information theory degrade your
signal.
Sure, but why did they use a color camera on the Moon in the first
place,
if the broadcasted pictures are not in color???
Color cameras were bulky, heavy and expensive in the late 60th and early 70th.
I've asked you some times already: how does your moronic Shit recognize
a straight/geodesic line of space (not of spacetime) - and you've never
answerred. Of course, poor trash.
I got my answer : both incompetence and dishonesty. Thanks Maciej!
Python wrote:
I've asked you some times already: how does your moronic Shit recognize
a straight/geodesic line of space (not of spacetime) - and you've never
answerred. Of course, poor trash.
I got my answer : both incompetence and dishonesty. Thanks Maciej!
bullshit, i see no answer
Hubble should be able to detect centimetre sized objects on the Moon.
Simple arithmetic will show that.
Now Webb could tell the shoe size as well.
WOOF woof-woof woof woof-woof woof
Bertietaylor
Actually I assume, that people went to the Moon.
The question was NOT 'if' but 'how'.
I assume, that the Nazis had already so called 'Haunebus', which were incorrectly named 'Ufos'.
Those could actually fly to the Moon and most likely did.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 546 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 09:14:36 |
| Calls: | 10,388 |
| Calls today: | 3 |
| Files: | 14,061 |
| Messages: | 6,416,843 |
| Posted today: | 1 |