On 6/19/2025 9:01 PM, Paul B. Andersen wrote:
Den 19.06.2025 14:15, skrev bertietaylor:
Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover).Two questions:
Why do astronomers think that galaxies contain some invisible (not
interacting with EM-radiation) matter with mass?
Because what is visible (and seen) doesn't fit their precious theories?
On Tue, 24 Jun 2025 10:26:20 +0000, Hibou wrote:
I point out that you started this thread in aue with a post entitled
'Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)'. What has
that to do with English usage?
It clarifies what the supposed dark matter is, proudly and originally in
the English language.
Bertitaylor wrote:
On Tue, 24 Jun 2025 10:26:20 +0000, Hibou wrote:
I point out that you started this thread in aue with a post entitled
'Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)'. What has
that to do with English usage?
It clarifies what the supposed dark matter is, proudly and originally in
the English language.
joos declares publicly that Jesus boils in human excrement, and his
mother
was a whore.
you are not a friend of joos, for certain. I cant explain america. It
looks like fags and gays.
joos declares publicly that Jesus boils in human excrement, and his
mother was a whore.
you are not a friend of joos, for certain. I cant explain america. It
looks like fags and gays.
Whatever you may think, we are against bad ideas and bad habits, not
groups.
Woof woof
It obviously is _fusion_ of H and T in a hydrogen bomb.
Same thing happens in the Sun and the stars.
Indeed, fusion of hydrogen and deuterium.
Den 26.06.2025 09:15, skrev bertitaylor:
On Wed, 25 Jun 2025 17:30:27 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
In sci.physics Bertitaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
On Mon, 23 Jun 2025 18:54:15 +0000, Paul.B.Andersen wrote:
Den 23.06.2025 05:47, skrev bertietaylor:
When Arindam says that the core of any star must be very cold, then >>>>>> bang
phut goes the above precious E=mcc theory.
Can you please explain Arindam's theory?
Where does the radiated energy come from?
Deuterium fission.
Deuterium is stable, does not undergo radioactive decay, and thus cannot >>> undergo fission, crackpot.
Fool, we are not talking about deuterium on Earth, decaying naturally.
Things are different in the Sun's atmosphere. Lots of heat, radiation,
charged particles, very dense there.
And no deuterium is decaying, but a lot of deuterium nuclei are fused
to Helium.
It is deuterium fission which provides the energy for the hydrogen bombs
on Earth.
Good grief, what a gigantic blunder!
It obviously is _fusion_ of H and T in a hydrogen bomb.
Same thing happens in the Sun and the stars.
Indeed, fusion of hydrogen and deuterium.
Once we throw out the bollocks of e=mcc, and follow Arindam's physics,
the whole universe becomes straight and clear. And simple in its
eternity and infinity.
Ah. So it is Arindam who have told you that there is
fission of deuterium in a H-bomb, and you are to ignorant
and stupid to understand how ridiculous it is!
BTW, didn't you know that according to Arindam it is
"free energy" that heat the Sun?
On 6/26/2025 10:37 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
On 6/26/2025 8:47 PM, Bertitaylor wrote:
On Thu, 26 Jun 2025 13:23:35 +0000, Paul.B.Andersen wrote:
Den 26.06.2025 09:15, skrev bertitaylor:
On Wed, 25 Jun 2025 17:30:27 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
In sci.physics Bertitaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
On Mon, 23 Jun 2025 18:54:15 +0000, Paul.B.Andersen wrote:
Den 23.06.2025 05:47, skrev bertietaylor:
When Arindam says that the core of any star must be very cold, then >>>>>>>>> bang
phut goes the above precious E=mcc theory.
Can you please explain Arindam's theory?
Where does the radiated energy come from?
Deuterium fission.
Deuterium is stable, does not undergo radioactive decay, and thus
cannot
undergo fission, crackpot.
Fool, we are not talking about deuterium on Earth, decaying naturally. >>>>> Things are different in the Sun's atmosphere. Lots of heat, radiation, >>>>> charged particles, very dense there.
And no deuterium is decaying, but a lot of deuterium nuclei are fused
to Helium.
It is deuterium fission which provides the energy for the hydrogen
bombs
on Earth.
Good grief, what a gigantic blunder!
Yes it was the most gigantic blunder to think that fusion at all
happens.
:-D
It obviously is _fusion_ of H and T in a hydrogen bomb.
Very not obviously. The fission of the deuterium nucleus (two protons
held by one electron) creates extraordinary force creating great
energies as produced by the stars.
Fusion for stars? fission to to kick artificially kick of the reaction.
Or ICF or something.
[...]
several tanks with a metal hydride for different isotopes eof hydrogen. Stored...Ready for reaction.
On 6/26/2025 11:40 PM, Bertitaylor wrote:
On Fri, 27 Jun 2025 5:47:10 +0000, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
On 6/26/2025 10:37 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
On 6/26/2025 8:47 PM, Bertitaylor wrote:
On Thu, 26 Jun 2025 13:23:35 +0000, Paul.B.Andersen wrote:
Den 26.06.2025 09:15, skrev bertitaylor:
On Wed, 25 Jun 2025 17:30:27 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
In sci.physics Bertitaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
On Mon, 23 Jun 2025 18:54:15 +0000, Paul.B.Andersen wrote:
Den 23.06.2025 05:47, skrev bertietaylor:
When Arindam says that the core of any star must be very cold, >>>>>>>>>>> then
bang
phut goes the above precious E=mcc theory.
Can you please explain Arindam's theory?
Where does the radiated energy come from?
Deuterium fission.
Deuterium is stable, does not undergo radioactive decay, and thus >>>>>>>> cannot
undergo fission, crackpot.
Fool, we are not talking about deuterium on Earth, decaying
naturally.
Things are different in the Sun's atmosphere. Lots of heat,
radiation,
charged particles, very dense there.
And no deuterium is decaying, but a lot of deuterium nuclei are fused >>>>>> to Helium.
It is deuterium fission which provides the energy for the hydrogen >>>>>>> bombs
on Earth.
Good grief, what a gigantic blunder!
Yes it was the most gigantic blunder to think that fusion at all
happens.
:-D
It obviously is _fusion_ of H and T in a hydrogen bomb.
Very not obviously. The fission of the deuterium nucleus (two protons >>>>> held by one electron) creates extraordinary force creating great
energies as produced by the stars.
Fusion for stars? fission to to kick artificially kick of the reaction. >>>> Or ICF or something.
[...]
several tanks with a metal hydride for different isotopes eof hydrogen.
Stored...Ready for reaction.
Won't work, you need lotsa intense gamma rays, high energy particles as
well to disturb the two protons in the deuterium nucleus to fission with
snapping of the electron bond holding them together.
Can tanks of hydrogen isotopes contained in metal hydride be released
all at once and cause high dense pressure in a chamber to help make a fission/fusion reaction more, vibrant, so to speak?
Arindam has shown how to get energy from deuterium in controlled style
in his links. Very likely so called fusion approaches these days are
based upon deuterium fission.
Once Einstein and Helmholtz are thrown out there is joy for future
generations.
Woof woof woof-woof woof woof-woof woof
Bertietaylor
--
On Thu, 26 Jun 2025 13:23:35 +0000, Paul.B.Andersen wrote:
Den 26.06.2025 09:15, skrev bertitaylor:
On Wed, 25 Jun 2025 17:30:27 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
In sci.physics Bertitaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
On Mon, 23 Jun 2025 18:54:15 +0000, Paul.B.Andersen wrote:
Den 23.06.2025 05:47, skrev bertietaylor:
When Arindam says that the core of any star must be very cold, then >>>>>>> bang
phut goes the above precious E=mcc theory.
Can you please explain Arindam's theory?
Where does the radiated energy come from?
Deuterium fission.
Deuterium is stable, does not undergo radioactive decay, and thus cannot >>>> undergo fission, crackpot.
Fool, we are not talking about deuterium on Earth, decaying naturally.
Things are different in the Sun's atmosphere. Lots of heat, radiation,
charged particles, very dense there.
And no deuterium is decaying, but a lot of deuterium nuclei are fused
to Helium.
It is deuterium fission which provides the energy for the hydrogen bombs >>> on Earth.
Good grief, what a gigantic blunder!
Yes it was the most gigantic blunder to think that fusion at all
happens.
:-D
It obviously is _fusion_ of H and T in a hydrogen bomb.
Very not obviously. The fission of the deuterium nucleus (two protons
held by one electron) creates extraordinary force creating great
energies as produced by the stars.
On Fri, 27 Jun 2025 5:47:10 +0000, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
On 6/26/2025 10:37 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
On 6/26/2025 8:47 PM, Bertitaylor wrote:
On Thu, 26 Jun 2025 13:23:35 +0000, Paul.B.Andersen wrote:
Den 26.06.2025 09:15, skrev bertitaylor:
On Wed, 25 Jun 2025 17:30:27 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
In sci.physics Bertitaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
On Mon, 23 Jun 2025 18:54:15 +0000, Paul.B.Andersen wrote:
Den 23.06.2025 05:47, skrev bertietaylor:
When Arindam says that the core of any star must be very cold, then >>>>>>>>>> bang
phut goes the above precious E=mcc theory.
Can you please explain Arindam's theory?
Where does the radiated energy come from?
Deuterium fission.
Deuterium is stable, does not undergo radioactive decay, and thus >>>>>>> cannot
undergo fission, crackpot.
Fool, we are not talking about deuterium on Earth, decaying naturally. >>>>>> Things are different in the Sun's atmosphere. Lots of heat, radiation, >>>>>> charged particles, very dense there.
And no deuterium is decaying, but a lot of deuterium nuclei are fused >>>>> to Helium.
It is deuterium fission which provides the energy for the hydrogen >>>>>> bombs
on Earth.
Good grief, what a gigantic blunder!
Yes it was the most gigantic blunder to think that fusion at all
happens.
:-D
It obviously is _fusion_ of H and T in a hydrogen bomb.
Very not obviously. The fission of the deuterium nucleus (two protons
held by one electron) creates extraordinary force creating great
energies as produced by the stars.
Fusion for stars? fission to to kick artificially kick of the reaction.
Or ICF or something.
[...]
several tanks with a metal hydride for different isotopes eof hydrogen.
Stored...Ready for reaction.
Won't work, you need lotsa intense gamma rays, high energy particles as
well to disturb the two protons in the deuterium nucleus to fission with snapping of the electron bond holding them together.
On Fri, 27 Jun 2025 6:54:28 +0000, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
On 6/26/2025 11:40 PM, Bertitaylor wrote:
On Fri, 27 Jun 2025 5:47:10 +0000, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
On 6/26/2025 10:37 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
On 6/26/2025 8:47 PM, Bertitaylor wrote:
On Thu, 26 Jun 2025 13:23:35 +0000, Paul.B.Andersen wrote:
Den 26.06.2025 09:15, skrev bertitaylor:
On Wed, 25 Jun 2025 17:30:27 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
In sci.physics Bertitaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 23 Jun 2025 18:54:15 +0000, Paul.B.Andersen wrote: >>>>>>>>>>
Den 23.06.2025 05:47, skrev bertietaylor:
When Arindam says that the core of any star must be very cold, >>>>>>>>>>>> then
bang
phut goes the above precious E=mcc theory.
Can you please explain Arindam's theory?
Where does the radiated energy come from?
Deuterium fission.
Deuterium is stable, does not undergo radioactive decay, and thus >>>>>>>>> cannot
undergo fission, crackpot.
Fool, we are not talking about deuterium on Earth, decaying
naturally.
Things are different in the Sun's atmosphere. Lots of heat,
radiation,
charged particles, very dense there.
And no deuterium is decaying, but a lot of deuterium nuclei are fused >>>>>>> to Helium.
It is deuterium fission which provides the energy for the hydrogen >>>>>>>> bombs
on Earth.
Good grief, what a gigantic blunder!
Yes it was the most gigantic blunder to think that fusion at all
happens.
:-D
It obviously is _fusion_ of H and T in a hydrogen bomb.
Very not obviously. The fission of the deuterium nucleus (two protons >>>>>> held by one electron) creates extraordinary force creating great
energies as produced by the stars.
Fusion for stars? fission to to kick artificially kick of the reaction. >>>>> Or ICF or something.
[...]
several tanks with a metal hydride for different isotopes eof hydrogen. >>>> Stored...Ready for reaction.
Won't work, you need lotsa intense gamma rays, high energy particles as
well to disturb the two protons in the deuterium nucleus to fission with >>> snapping of the electron bond holding them together.
Arindam's idea is to create a flow of deuterium ions and hammer them
with X rays and very high speed electrons. Some of these ions will bust
and create heat on a controlled basis.
Den 27.06.2025 05:47, skrev Bertitaylor:
Very not obviously. The fission of the deuterium nucleus (two protons
held by one electron) creates extraordinary force creating great
energies as produced by the stars.
But let's play along:
The electrostatic repulsion between the nuclei is very strong,
and in 1939 Lise Meitner calculated that the nuclei will repel each
other and should gain a total kinetic energy in the order of 200 MeV.
The rest is history.
Lise Meitner was the mother of the atomic bomb.
Your "Deuterium fission" is idiotic nonsense.
BTW, this reaction also confirms E = mcยฒ
1n + U-235 โ Ba-141 + Kr-92 + 3n
"u" is "unified atomic mass unit", 1 u = 931.5 MeV
E = mcยฒ โ 174 MeV
Which is of the same order of magnitude as calculated by Meitner.
Bertitaylor wrote:
joos declares publicly that Jesus boils in human excrement, and his
mother was a whore.
you are not a friend of joos, for certain. I cant explain america. It
looks like fags and gays.
Whatever you may think, we are against bad ideas and bad habits, not
groups.
Woof woof
but that's joos only oriented. You are a lying bitch. A wanker.
In sci.physics Bertitaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
On Fri, 27 Jun 2025 5:47:10 +0000, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
On 6/26/2025 10:37 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
On 6/26/2025 8:47 PM, Bertitaylor wrote:
On Thu, 26 Jun 2025 13:23:35 +0000, Paul.B.Andersen wrote:
Den 26.06.2025 09:15, skrev bertitaylor:
On Wed, 25 Jun 2025 17:30:27 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
In sci.physics Bertitaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
On Mon, 23 Jun 2025 18:54:15 +0000, Paul.B.Andersen wrote:
Den 23.06.2025 05:47, skrev bertietaylor:
When Arindam says that the core of any star must be very cold, then >>>>>>>>>>> bang
phut goes the above precious E=mcc theory.
Can you please explain Arindam's theory?
Where does the radiated energy come from?
Deuterium fission.
Deuterium is stable, does not undergo radioactive decay, and thus >>>>>>>> cannot
undergo fission, crackpot.
Fool, we are not talking about deuterium on Earth, decaying naturally. >>>>>>> Things are different in the Sun's atmosphere. Lots of heat, radiation, >>>>>>> charged particles, very dense there.
And no deuterium is decaying, but a lot of deuterium nuclei are fused >>>>>> to Helium.
It is deuterium fission which provides the energy for the hydrogen >>>>>>> bombs
on Earth.
Good grief, what a gigantic blunder!
Yes it was the most gigantic blunder to think that fusion at all
happens.
:-D
It obviously is _fusion_ of H and T in a hydrogen bomb.
Very not obviously. The fission of the deuterium nucleus (two protons >>>>> held by one electron) creates extraordinary force creating great
energies as produced by the stars.
Fusion for stars? fission to to kick artificially kick of the reaction. >>>> Or ICF or something.
[...]
several tanks with a metal hydride for different isotopes eof hydrogen.
Stored...Ready for reaction.
Won't work, you need lotsa intense gamma rays, high energy particles as
well to disturb the two protons in the deuterium nucleus to fission with
snapping of the electron bond holding them together.
Deuterium has one proton and one neutron. If there were two protons it
would be helium.
<snip remaining nonsense>
On 6/26/2025 11:40 PM, Bertitaylor wrote:
On Fri, 27 Jun 2025 5:47:10 +0000, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
On 6/26/2025 10:37 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
On 6/26/2025 8:47 PM, Bertitaylor wrote:
On Thu, 26 Jun 2025 13:23:35 +0000, Paul.B.Andersen wrote:
Den 26.06.2025 09:15, skrev bertitaylor:
On Wed, 25 Jun 2025 17:30:27 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
In sci.physics Bertitaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
On Mon, 23 Jun 2025 18:54:15 +0000, Paul.B.Andersen wrote:
Den 23.06.2025 05:47, skrev bertietaylor:
When Arindam says that the core of any star must be very cold, >>>>>>>>>>> then
bang
phut goes the above precious E=mcc theory.
Can you please explain Arindam's theory?
Where does the radiated energy come from?
Deuterium fission.
Deuterium is stable, does not undergo radioactive decay, and thus >>>>>>>> cannot
undergo fission, crackpot.
Fool, we are not talking about deuterium on Earth, decaying
naturally.
Things are different in the Sun's atmosphere. Lots of heat,
radiation,
charged particles, very dense there.
And no deuterium is decaying, but a lot of deuterium nuclei are fused >>>>>> to Helium.
It is deuterium fission which provides the energy for the hydrogen >>>>>>> bombs
on Earth.
Good grief, what a gigantic blunder!
Yes it was the most gigantic blunder to think that fusion at all
happens.
:-D
It obviously is _fusion_ of H and T in a hydrogen bomb.
Very not obviously. The fission of the deuterium nucleus (two protons >>>>> held by one electron) creates extraordinary force creating great
energies as produced by the stars.
Fusion for stars? fission to to kick artificially kick of the reaction. >>>> Or ICF or something.
[...]
several tanks with a metal hydride for different isotopes eof hydrogen.
Stored...Ready for reaction.
Won't work, you need lotsa intense gamma rays, high energy particles as
well to disturb the two protons in the deuterium nucleus to fission with
snapping of the electron bond holding them together.
Arindam has shown how to get energy from deuterium in controlled style
in his links. Very likely so called fusion approaches these days are
based upon deuterium fission.
Once Einstein and Helmholtz are thrown out there is joy for future
generations.
Woof woof woof-woof woof woof-woof woof
Bertietaylor
--
Or a tank with a metal hydride in it holding say, stable hydrogen. Apply
a little heat to it and it will release hydrogen? So, how stable would
the tank be? Can we cut into it without it exploding?
On Fri, 27 Jun 2025 13:25:38 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
In sci.physics Bertitaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
On Fri, 27 Jun 2025 5:47:10 +0000, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
On 6/26/2025 10:37 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
On 6/26/2025 8:47 PM, Bertitaylor wrote:
On Thu, 26 Jun 2025 13:23:35 +0000, Paul.B.Andersen wrote:
Den 26.06.2025 09:15, skrev bertitaylor:
On Wed, 25 Jun 2025 17:30:27 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
In sci.physics Bertitaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 23 Jun 2025 18:54:15 +0000, Paul.B.Andersen wrote: >>>>>>>>>>
Den 23.06.2025 05:47, skrev bertietaylor:
When Arindam says that the core of any star must be very cold, then
bang
phut goes the above precious E=mcc theory.
Can you please explain Arindam's theory?
Where does the radiated energy come from?
Deuterium fission.
Deuterium is stable, does not undergo radioactive decay, and thus >>>>>>>>> cannot
undergo fission, crackpot.
Fool, we are not talking about deuterium on Earth, decaying naturally. >>>>>>>> Things are different in the Sun's atmosphere. Lots of heat, radiation, >>>>>>>> charged particles, very dense there.
And no deuterium is decaying, but a lot of deuterium nuclei are fused >>>>>>> to Helium.
It is deuterium fission which provides the energy for the hydrogen >>>>>>>> bombs
on Earth.
Good grief, what a gigantic blunder!
Yes it was the most gigantic blunder to think that fusion at all
happens.
:-D
It obviously is _fusion_ of H and T in a hydrogen bomb.
Very not obviously. The fission of the deuterium nucleus (two protons >>>>>> held by one electron) creates extraordinary force creating great
energies as produced by the stars.
Fusion for stars? fission to to kick artificially kick of the reaction. >>>>> Or ICF or something.
[...]
several tanks with a metal hydride for different isotopes eof hydrogen. >>>> Stored...Ready for reaction.
Won't work, you need lotsa intense gamma rays, high energy particles as
well to disturb the two protons in the deuterium nucleus to fission with >>> snapping of the electron bond holding them together.
Deuterium has one proton and one neutron. If there were two protons it
would be helium.
A neutron is the tightest bond between a proton and an electron. The net charge is consequently zero but their characteristics remain same on an individual basis. And as explained by Arindam, cause the electrostatic
effect known as gravity.
WOOF woof-woof woof woof-woof woof
Bertietaylor
On 6/27/2025 5:13 PM, Bertitaylor wrote:
On Fri, 27 Jun 2025 6:56:57 +0000, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
On 6/26/2025 11:40 PM, Bertitaylor wrote:
On Fri, 27 Jun 2025 5:47:10 +0000, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
On 6/26/2025 10:37 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
On 6/26/2025 8:47 PM, Bertitaylor wrote:
On Thu, 26 Jun 2025 13:23:35 +0000, Paul.B.Andersen wrote:
Den 26.06.2025 09:15, skrev bertitaylor:
On Wed, 25 Jun 2025 17:30:27 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
In sci.physics Bertitaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 23 Jun 2025 18:54:15 +0000, Paul.B.Andersen wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>
Den 23.06.2025 05:47, skrev bertietaylor:
When Arindam says that the core of any star must be very cold, >>>>>>>>>>>>> then
bang
phut goes the above precious E=mcc theory.
Can you please explain Arindam's theory?
Where does the radiated energy come from?
Deuterium fission.
Deuterium is stable, does not undergo radioactive decay, and thus >>>>>>>>>> cannot
undergo fission, crackpot.
Fool, we are not talking about deuterium on Earth, decaying
naturally.
Things are different in the Sun's atmosphere. Lots of heat,
radiation,
charged particles, very dense there.
And no deuterium is decaying, but a lot of deuterium nuclei are >>>>>>>> fused
to Helium.
It is deuterium fission which provides the energy for the hydrogen >>>>>>>>> bombs
on Earth.
Good grief, what a gigantic blunder!
Yes it was the most gigantic blunder to think that fusion at all >>>>>>> happens.
:-D
It obviously is _fusion_ of H and T in a hydrogen bomb.
Very not obviously. The fission of the deuterium nucleus (two protons >>>>>>> held by one electron) creates extraordinary force creating great >>>>>>> energies as produced by the stars.
Fusion for stars? fission to to kick artificially kick of the
reaction.
Or ICF or something.
[...]
several tanks with a metal hydride for different isotopes eof hydrogen. >>>>> Stored...Ready for reaction.
Won't work, you need lotsa intense gamma rays, high energy particles as >>>> well to disturb the two protons in the deuterium nucleus to fission with >>>> snapping of the electron bond holding them together.
Arindam has shown how to get energy from deuterium in controlled style >>>> in his links. Very likely so called fusion approaches these days are
based upon deuterium fission.
Once Einstein and Helmholtz are thrown out there is joy for future
generations.
Woof woof woof-woof woof woof-woof woof
Bertietaylor
--
Or a tank with a metal hydride in it holding say, stable hydrogen. Apply >>> a little heat to it and it will release hydrogen? So, how stable would
the tank be? Can we cut into it without it exploding?
It should be stable if there was only hydrogen around. Anyway how is
this relevant to dark matter?
Not sure. Sorry about that. Humm... Perhaps dark matter can be the
underlying field scaffold?
For instance in this n-ary volumetric of mine:
https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=1441526523673008&set=pcb.1441526963672964
?
On 6/28/2025 7:49 PM, Bertitaylor wrote:
On Sun, 29 Jun 2025 2:04:58 +0000, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
On 6/27/2025 5:13 PM, Bertitaylor wrote:
On Fri, 27 Jun 2025 6:56:57 +0000, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
On 6/26/2025 11:40 PM, Bertitaylor wrote:
On Fri, 27 Jun 2025 5:47:10 +0000, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
On 6/26/2025 10:37 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
On 6/26/2025 8:47 PM, Bertitaylor wrote:
On Thu, 26 Jun 2025 13:23:35 +0000, Paul.B.Andersen wrote:
Den 26.06.2025 09:15, skrev bertitaylor:
On Wed, 25 Jun 2025 17:30:27 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
In sci.physics Bertitaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 23 Jun 2025 18:54:15 +0000, Paul.B.Andersen wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>
Den 23.06.2025 05:47, skrev bertietaylor:
When Arindam says that the core of any star must be very >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cold,
then
bang
phut goes the above precious E=mcc theory.
Can you please explain Arindam's theory?
Where does the radiated energy come from?
Deuterium fission.
Deuterium is stable, does not undergo radioactive decay, and >>>>>>>>>>>> thus
cannot
undergo fission, crackpot.
Fool, we are not talking about deuterium on Earth, decaying >>>>>>>>>>> naturally.
Things are different in the Sun's atmosphere. Lots of heat, >>>>>>>>>>> radiation,
charged particles, very dense there.
And no deuterium is decaying, but a lot of deuterium nuclei are >>>>>>>>>> fused
to Helium.
It is deuterium fission which provides the energy for the >>>>>>>>>>> hydrogen
bombs
on Earth.
Good grief, what a gigantic blunder!
Yes it was the most gigantic blunder to think that fusion at all >>>>>>>>> happens.
:-D
It obviously is _fusion_ of H and T in a hydrogen bomb.
Very not obviously. The fission of the deuterium nucleus (two >>>>>>>>> protons
held by one electron) creates extraordinary force creating great >>>>>>>>> energies as produced by the stars.
Fusion for stars? fission to to kick artificially kick of the
reaction.
Or ICF or something.
[...]
several tanks with a metal hydride for different isotopes eof
hydrogen.
Stored...Ready for reaction.
Won't work, you need lotsa intense gamma rays, high energy
particles as
well to disturb the two protons in the deuterium nucleus to fission >>>>>> with
snapping of the electron bond holding them together.
Arindam has shown how to get energy from deuterium in controlled style >>>>>> in his links. Very likely so called fusion approaches these days are >>>>>> based upon deuterium fission.
Once Einstein and Helmholtz are thrown out there is joy for future >>>>>> generations.
Woof woof woof-woof woof woof-woof woof
Bertietaylor
--
Or a tank with a metal hydride in it holding say, stable hydrogen.
Apply
a little heat to it and it will release hydrogen? So, how stable would >>>>> the tank be? Can we cut into it without it exploding?
It should be stable if there was only hydrogen around. Anyway how is
this relevant to dark matter?
Not sure. Sorry about that. Humm... Perhaps dark matter can be the
underlying field scaffold?
What is that? Are you going to hang or behead fields!? :)
;^)
Fields are fun. Especially my experimental one. Its as if each field
line is a potential path for a photon to travel on. They can get rather
odd:
From a volume of mine:
https://i.ibb.co/39DMrYp4/image.png
Anyway what is wrong in saying all stars are like Earth's with hydrogen
and helium atmosphere?
WOOF woof-woof woof woof-woof woof
Bertietaylor
For instance in this n-ary volumetric of mine:
https://www.facebook.com/photo/?
fbid=1441526523673008&set=pcb.1441526963672964
?
--
The idea of having electrons in the nucleus (rather than neutrons)
was already discredited before neutrons were actually discovered. It is
quite impossible.
The reason is electron zero-point energy,
which would become huge for confined electrons in such a small volume.
Note for the kiddies: don't be misled.
There are no electrons in the nucleus.
The electron which is emitted in beta decay gets created the moment it
leaves the nucleus,
(together with an anti-neutrino)
D and T combine very easily in fusion to โดHe, a stable Helium isotope. That's why the Hydrogen in a H-bomb is enriched with both D and T.
(Some, or all of the T can be created in the bombs itself from lithium.)
An atomic bomb exploded on Earth can't create the temperature and
pressure to make H explode in a chain reaction. The enrichment of D an T
are necessary to make the bomb explode.
I wanted to put GR and QM into a single framework and thought, that
matter should be 'relative'.
Matter is mass and mass is standardised by units that are absolute.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 546 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 03:53:23 |
| Calls: | 10,387 |
| Calls today: | 2 |
| Files: | 14,061 |
| Messages: | 6,416,778 |
