• Re: You literally wrote "overheat" (Re: I guess your brain was "overhea

    From Neury Valetov@21:1/5 to Mild Shock on Mon Jul 28 19:44:10 2025
    XPost: sci.physics.relativity

    Mild Shock wrote:


    You literally wrote "overheat" here:

    Jordon Molokovsky schrieb:
    you assume too much. The 'overheat' is merely based on the size of
    memory required, and the number of instructions sent to the CPU's
    decoder, together with data, occupying the bus, through the pipeline, ignoring the pipeline etc. Not directly related to time. And 'stacks'
    ARE memory, not something to 'afford as excess' fucking stoopid.

    sense the punctuation, cretin, that's not overheating, then fucking around
    like stupid in CPU is overheating. Educate yourself civilized maner,
    idiot.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Mild Shock@21:1/5 to Jordon Molokovsky on Tue Jul 29 15:57:17 2025
    Hi,

    Yeah don't do this things:
    - Don't overclock you CPU if system has poor airflow
    - Do not use PC as a ram server rack, power supply not designed for it
    - Refrain from usings computers alltogether, you seem to be a moron.

    LoL

    Bye

    Jordon Molokovsky schrieb:
    you assume too much. The 'overheat' is merely based on the size of
    memory required, and the number of instructions sent to the CPU's
    decoder, together with data, occupying the bus, through the pipeline, ignoring the pipeline etc. Not directly related to time. And 'stacks'
    ARE memory, not something to 'afford as excess' fucking stoopid.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)