XPost: alt.bible.prophecy, uk.legal, uk.politics.misc

https://www.reddit.com/r/LockdownSkepticism/comments/1d8n1gr/uk_study_confirms_covid_vaccine_risks_outweigh/


UK study confirms COVID vaccine risks outweigh benefits in children?

RAPHAEL LATASTER, PHD
JUN 05, 2024
red white and black textile
This won’t help parents who gave COVID-19 vaccines to their children
sleep at night. A UK pre-print study (Andrews et al.), involving
researchers from Oxford University, concerning over a million children
(aged 5-15) indicates no mortality benefits to vaccination for children, coupled with risks like myocarditis. Source. One key finding: “There
were no COVID-19-related deaths in any group.” So, at least for the most direct and important measure, saving the lives of vaccinees, it appears
that there was no benefit to the children. Another key finding:
“myocarditis and pericarditis were documented only in the vaccinated groups”. Come again? There were no, I repeat, no cases of myocarditis
and pericarditis in the unvaccinated. All of these occurred in the
vaccinated children, and “More than 51% of adolescents with myocarditis
were admitted to hospital and more than 51% attended emergency care.”
This seems quite a bit different from the claim that such risks were
worse from COVID-19 than from the jab (which never made much sense
anyway since the jab doesn’t stop you from getting COVID, meaning it
isn’t risk vs risk, it’s risk plus risk). Source. And what of the other possible side effects, like blood clotting and more? Finally, even when
there appeared to be some minor non-mortality benefit, the researchers
noted: “Protection against positive SARS-CoV-2 tests was transient.” Literally gone within a few months.

The first two points are consistent with my earlier claim that UK
government data, combined with what we now know about the jab’s adverse effects, makes it look like the risks outweigh the benefits, at least in
the young and healthy, and by a lot. The final point is consistent with
the mounds of evidence that any effectiveness of the vaccines diminishes
to zero incredibly quickly (surely a by-product of the likely massive exaggerations of effectiveness and safety from the very beginning), and
can even turn negative; and that adverse effects of the vaccines are far
from rare. How much clearer can it get that these products should not
have even been approved, let alone forced on us (with all the additional problems that entails)? And yet, the powers that be, despite all this
science, still maintain that the benefits outweigh the risks, for all.
Source.

Okay then.

Extra: Please note that even if side effects are ‘rare’, if there’s no benefit, isn’t it beyond obvious that these products should be avoided,
at least for the young and healthy? And especially if they turn out to
be negatively effective, which is becoming increasingly plausible? And
we can’t even fully determine how ‘rare’ the side effects are yet as we still do not have access to long-term data. We’ve got a wild couple of
years ahead of us.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: alt.bible.prophecy, uk.legal, uk.politics.misc
XPost: alt.christnet.christianlife

Michael Ejercito wrote:

https://www.reddit.com/r/LockdownSkepticism/comments/1d8n1gr/uk_study_confirms_covid_vaccine_risks_outweigh/

UK study confirms COVID vaccine risks outweigh benefits in children?

RAPHAEL LATASTER, PHD
JUN 05, 2024
red white and black textile
This won�t help parents who gave COVID-19 vaccines to their children
sleep at night. A UK pre-print study (Andrews et al.), involving
researchers from Oxford University, concerning over a million children
(aged 5-15) indicates no mortality benefits to vaccination for children, >coupled with risks like myocarditis. Source. One key finding: �There
were no COVID-19-related deaths in any group.� So, at least for the most >direct and important measure, saving the lives of vaccinees, it appears
that there was no benefit to the children. Another key finding:
�myocarditis and pericarditis were documented only in the vaccinated
groups�. Come again? There were no, I repeat, no cases of myocarditis
and pericarditis in the unvaccinated. All of these occurred in the
vaccinated children, and �More than 51% of adolescents with myocarditis
were admitted to hospital and more than 51% attended emergency care.�
This seems quite a bit different from the claim that such risks were
worse from COVID-19 than from the jab (which never made much sense
anyway since the jab doesn�t stop you from getting COVID, meaning it
isn�t risk vs risk, it�s risk plus risk). Source. And what of the other >possible side effects, like blood clotting and more? Finally, even when
there appeared to be some minor non-mortality benefit, the researchers
noted: �Protection against positive SARS-CoV-2 tests was transient.� >Literally gone within a few months.

The first two points are consistent with my earlier claim that UK
government data, combined with what we now know about the jab�s adverse >effects, makes it look like the risks outweigh the benefits, at least in
the young and healthy, and by a lot. The final point is consistent with
the mounds of evidence that any effectiveness of the vaccines diminishes
to zero incredibly quickly (surely a by-product of the likely massive >exaggerations of effectiveness and safety from the very beginning), and
can even turn negative; and that adverse effects of the vaccines are far
from rare. How much clearer can it get that these products should not
have even been approved, let alone forced on us (with all the additional >problems that entails)? And yet, the powers that be, despite all this >science, still maintain that the benefits outweigh the risks, for all. >Source.

Okay then.

Extra: Please note that even if side effects are �rare�, if there�s no >benefit, isn�t it beyond obvious that these products should be avoided,
at least for the young and healthy? And especially if they turn out to
be negatively effective, which is becoming increasingly plausible? And
we can�t even fully determine how �rare� the side effects are yet as we
still do not have access to long-term data. We�ve got a wild couple of
years ahead of us.

In the interim, we are 100% prepared/protected in the "full armor of
GOD" (Ephesians 6:11) which we put on as soon as we use Apostle Paul's
secret (Philippians 4:12). Though masking is less protective, it helps
us avoid the appearance of doing the evil of spreading airborne
pathogens while there are people getting sick because of not being
100% protected. It is written that we're to "abstain from **all**
appearance of doing evil" (1 Thessalonians 5:22 w/**emphasis**).

Meanwhile, the only *perfect* (Matt 5:47-8 ) way to eradicate the
COVID-19 virus, thereby saving lives, in the UK & elsewhere is by
rapidly (i.e. use the "Rapid COVID-19 Test" ) finding out at any given
moment, including even while on-line, who among us are unwittingly
contagious (i.e pre-symptomatic or asymptomatic) in order to
"convince it forward" (John 15:12) for them to call their doctor and self-quarantine per their doctor in hopes of stopping this pandemic.
Thus, we're hoping for the best while preparing for the worse-case
scenario of the Alpha lineage mutations and others like the Omicron,
Gamma, Beta, Epsilon, Iota, Lambda, Mu & Delta lineage mutations
combining via slip-RNA-replication to form hybrids like "Deltamicron"
that may render current COVID vaccines/monoclonals/medicines/pills no
longer effective.

Indeed, I am wonderfully hungry ( https://groups.google.com/g/sci.med.cardiology/c/6ZoE95d-VKc/m/14vVZoyOBgAJ
) and hope you, Michael, also have a healthy appetite too.

So how are you ?

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: alt.bible.prophecy, uk.legal, uk.politics.misc
XPost: alt.christnet.christianlife

(Oxford) 06/07/24 Again not a LoosePeeledQuackIdiot bigot ...

https://groups.google.com/g/sci.med.cardiology/c/Ai33hw5PINI/m/wytVpY68MwAJ

Instead be "woke" to the sin of racial prejudice:

https://tinyurl.com/JesusIsWoke (i.e. not a Nazi bigot) *and* risen!!!

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: alt.bible.prophecy, uk.legal, uk.politics.misc
XPost: alt.christnet.christianlife

HeartDoc Andrew wrote:

Michael Ejercito wrote:

https://www.reddit.com/r/LockdownSkepticism/comments/1d8n1gr/uk_study_confirms_covid_vaccine_risks_outweigh/


UK study confirms COVID vaccine risks outweigh benefits in children?

RAPHAEL LATASTER, PHD
JUN 05, 2024
red white and black textile
This won’t help parents who gave COVID-19 vaccines to their children
sleep at night. A UK pre-print study (Andrews et al.), involving
researchers from Oxford University, concerning over a million children
(aged 5-15) indicates no mortality benefits to vaccination for children,
coupled with risks like myocarditis. Source. One key finding: “There
were no COVID-19-related deaths in any group.” So, at least for the most >> direct and important measure, saving the lives of vaccinees, it appears
that there was no benefit to the children. Another key finding:
“myocarditis and pericarditis were documented only in the vaccinated
groups”. Come again? There were no, I repeat, no cases of myocarditis
and pericarditis in the unvaccinated. All of these occurred in the
vaccinated children, and “More than 51% of adolescents with myocarditis
were admitted to hospital and more than 51% attended emergency care.”
This seems quite a bit different from the claim that such risks were
worse from COVID-19 than from the jab (which never made much sense
anyway since the jab doesn’t stop you from getting COVID, meaning it
isn’t risk vs risk, it’s risk plus risk). Source. And what of the other >> possible side effects, like blood clotting and more? Finally, even when
there appeared to be some minor non-mortality benefit, the researchers
noted: “Protection against positive SARS-CoV-2 tests was transient.”
Literally gone within a few months.

The first two points are consistent with my earlier claim that UK
government data, combined with what we now know about the jab’s adverse
effects, makes it look like the risks outweigh the benefits, at least in
the young and healthy, and by a lot. The final point is consistent with
the mounds of evidence that any effectiveness of the vaccines diminishes
to zero incredibly quickly (surely a by-product of the likely massive
exaggerations of effectiveness and safety from the very beginning), and
can even turn negative; and that adverse effects of the vaccines are far >>from rare. How much clearer can it get that these products should not
have even been approved, let alone forced on us (with all the additional
problems that entails)? And yet, the powers that be, despite all this
science, still maintain that the benefits outweigh the risks, for all.
Source.

Okay then.

Extra: Please note that even if side effects are ‘rare’, if there’s no >> benefit, isn’t it beyond obvious that these products should be avoided,
at least for the young and healthy? And especially if they turn out to
be negatively effective, which is becoming increasingly plausible? And
we can’t even fully determine how ‘rare’ the side effects are yet as we
still do not have access to long-term data. We’ve got a wild couple of
years ahead of us.

In the interim, we are 100% prepared/protected in the "full armor of
GOD" (Ephesians 6:11) which we put on as soon as we use Apostle Paul's
secret (Philippians 4:12). Though masking is less protective, it helps
us avoid the appearance of doing the evil of spreading airborne
pathogens while there are people getting sick because of not being
100% protected. It is written that we're to "abstain from **all**
appearance of doing evil" (1 Thessalonians 5:22 w/**emphasis**).

Meanwhile, the only *perfect* (Matt 5:47-8 ) way to eradicate the
COVID-19 virus, thereby saving lives, in the UK & elsewhere is by
rapidly (i.e. use the "Rapid COVID-19 Test" ) finding out at any given moment, including even while on-line, who among us are unwittingly
contagious (i.e pre-symptomatic or asymptomatic) in order to
"convince it forward" (John 15:12) for them to call their doctor and self-quarantine per their doctor in hopes of stopping this pandemic.
Thus, we're hoping for the best while preparing for the worse-case
scenario of the Alpha lineage mutations and others like the Omicron,
Gamma, Beta, Epsilon, Iota, Lambda, Mu & Delta lineage mutations
combining via slip-RNA-replication to form hybrids like "Deltamicron"
that may render current COVID vaccines/monoclonals/medicines/pills no
longer effective.

Indeed, I am wonderfully hungry ( https://groups.google.com/g/sci.med.cardiology/c/6ZoE95d-VKc/m/14vVZoyOBgAJ
) and hope you, Michael, also have a healthy appetite too.

So how are you ?

I am wonderfully hungry!


Michael

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: alt.bible.prophecy, uk.legal, uk.politics.misc
XPost: alt.christnet.christianlife

Michael Ejercito wrote:

HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:

Michael Ejercito wrote:

https://www.reddit.com/r/LockdownSkepticism/comments/1d8n1gr/uk_study_confirms_covid_vaccine_risks_outweigh/


UK study confirms COVID vaccine risks outweigh benefits in children?

RAPHAEL LATASTER, PHD
JUN 05, 2024
red white and black textile
This won�t help parents who gave COVID-19 vaccines to their children
sleep at night. A UK pre-print study (Andrews et al.), involving
researchers from Oxford University, concerning over a million children
(aged 5-15) indicates no mortality benefits to vaccination for children, >>> coupled with risks like myocarditis. Source. One key finding: �There
were no COVID-19-related deaths in any group.� So, at least for the most >>> direct and important measure, saving the lives of vaccinees, it appears
that there was no benefit to the children. Another key finding:
�myocarditis and pericarditis were documented only in the vaccinated
groups�. Come again? There were no, I repeat, no cases of myocarditis
and pericarditis in the unvaccinated. All of these occurred in the
vaccinated children, and �More than 51% of adolescents with myocarditis
were admitted to hospital and more than 51% attended emergency care.�
This seems quite a bit different from the claim that such risks were
worse from COVID-19 than from the jab (which never made much sense
anyway since the jab doesn�t stop you from getting COVID, meaning it
isn�t risk vs risk, it�s risk plus risk). Source. And what of the other
possible side effects, like blood clotting and more? Finally, even when
there appeared to be some minor non-mortality benefit, the researchers
noted: �Protection against positive SARS-CoV-2 tests was transient.�
Literally gone within a few months.

The first two points are consistent with my earlier claim that UK
government data, combined with what we now know about the jab�s adverse
effects, makes it look like the risks outweigh the benefits, at least in >>> the young and healthy, and by a lot. The final point is consistent with
the mounds of evidence that any effectiveness of the vaccines diminishes >>> to zero incredibly quickly (surely a by-product of the likely massive
exaggerations of effectiveness and safety from the very beginning), and
can even turn negative; and that adverse effects of the vaccines are far >>>from rare. How much clearer can it get that these products should not
have even been approved, let alone forced on us (with all the additional >>> problems that entails)? And yet, the powers that be, despite all this
science, still maintain that the benefits outweigh the risks, for all.
Source.

Okay then.

Extra: Please note that even if side effects are �rare�, if there�s no
benefit, isn�t it beyond obvious that these products should be avoided,
at least for the young and healthy? And especially if they turn out to
be negatively effective, which is becoming increasingly plausible? And
we can�t even fully determine how �rare� the side effects are yet as we
still do not have access to long-term data. We�ve got a wild couple of
years ahead of us.

In the interim, we are 100% prepared/protected in the "full armor of
GOD" (Ephesians 6:11) which we put on as soon as we use Apostle Paul's
secret (Philippians 4:12). Though masking is less protective, it helps
us avoid the appearance of doing the evil of spreading airborne
pathogens while there are people getting sick because of not being
100% protected. It is written that we're to "abstain from **all**
appearance of doing evil" (1 Thessalonians 5:22 w/**emphasis**).

Meanwhile, the only *perfect* (Matt 5:47-8 ) way to eradicate the
COVID-19 virus, thereby saving lives, in the UK & elsewhere is by
rapidly (i.e. use the "Rapid COVID-19 Test" ) finding out at any given
moment, including even while on-line, who among us are unwittingly
contagious (i.e pre-symptomatic or asymptomatic) in order to
"convince it forward" (John 15:12) for them to call their doctor and
self-quarantine per their doctor in hopes of stopping this pandemic.
Thus, we're hoping for the best while preparing for the worse-case
scenario of the Alpha lineage mutations and others like the Omicron,
Gamma, Beta, Epsilon, Iota, Lambda, Mu & Delta lineage mutations
combining via slip-RNA-replication to form hybrids like "Deltamicron"
that may render current COVID vaccines/monoclonals/medicines/pills no
longer effective.

Indeed, I am wonderfully hungry (
https://groups.google.com/g/sci.med.cardiology/c/6ZoE95d-VKc/m/14vVZoyOBgAJ >> ) and hope you, Michael, also have a healthy appetite too.

So how are you ?

I am wonderfully hungry!

While wonderfully hungry in the Holy Spirit, Who causes (Deuteronomy
8:3) us to hunger, I note that you, Michael, are rapture ready (Luke
17:37 means no COVID just as eagles circling over their food have no
COVID) and pray (2 Chronicles 7:14) that our Everlasting (Isaiah 9:6)
Father in Heaven continues to give us "much more" (Luke 11:13) Holy
Spirit (Galatians 5:22-23) so that we'd have much more of His Help to
always say/write that we're "wonderfully hungry" in **all** ways
including especially caring to "convince it forward" (John 15:12) with
all glory (Psalm112:1) to GOD (aka HaShem, Elohim, Abba, DEO), in
the name (John 16:23) of LORD Jesus Christ of Nazareth. Amen.

Laus DEO !

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: alt.bible.prophecy, uk.legal, uk.politics.misc
XPost: alt.christnet.christianlife

Loose Cannon:

ReplyPermalinkOn Mon, 10 Jun 2024 16:18:57 +0100, Quack Andrew B. Chung = SHEIN

BTW are you feeling a little lost here without your grik fiancee Roman
the Foreskin PEELER to peel your mini-forsekin (IF ANY)? LOL

The mangina is so obsessed with foreskins.

Sometimes, normal boys and normal men fantasize about labia.

But who accused him of being a normal man?

With Peeler gone, tthe gook has no friends.

You and the mangina never had a chance against the Peeler!

His life now revolves
around 20 year old posts from some nigger who ran away with his tail
between his legs and a quack who had his medical license revoked. Very
sad.

You have no chance against Dr. Chung either.

You are a Nazi.

As a Nazi, you are, above all else, a craven coward.

You are afraid to compete with others as equals because you know you
can not measure up.

You are afraid of your own inadequacy, so you want to murder your
betters.

You are afraid of the truth, so you want to murder those who would
tell it.

You are afraid of history, so you want to murder the past, to wipe
out the knowledge of the degeneracy, cowardice and failure of National Socialism.

Finally, you are afraid of the power of educated, informed adults.
Freedom of choice terrifies you… which is why you choose minor children
as sexual partners. You can not interact with competent adults in a consensually sexual way. You need to be able to impose yourself on a
helpless victim, be it a prepubescent boy, or a patient in a mental
hospital.

That is what you are, a Nazi, and there is nothing polite or honest
about it.


Michael

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: alt.bible.prophecy, uk.legal, uk.politics.misc
XPost: alt.christnet.christianlife

(Oxford) 06/10/24 Again praying w/ Michael here ...

https://narkive.com/YwcK99UN.5

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: alt.bible.prophecy, uk.legal, uk.politics.misc
XPost: alt.christnet.christianlife

Quack Andrew B. Chung = SHEIN = Anita = jew paedophile BARRY 'jewface' SHEINabout 12 hours ago

ReplyPermalinkOn Mon, 10 Jun 2024 20:03:37 -0700, NOT Michael Ejercito

You and the mangina never had a chance against the Peeler!

The Foreskin PEELER never had a chance against us Humans. That's why
he slitherered away like all the other jewlovers!

Nithing, the Peeler was your dominator, humiliator, and tormentor!

You are a nithing- homo sapiens by birth, subhuman BY CHOICE. The
key word is CHOICE. You were born with the same human nature as the
rest of us. Your CHOICES made you a nithing.

Bill explains what nithings are.

http://www.israpundit.com/2008/?p=9446

Define and Dehumanize the Enemy: Jihadists as Nithings or Nidings

by Bill Levinson
It is an ancient principle of magic (which modern people recognize as stories that reflect a society’s culture and psychology) that
knowledge of a person’s real or True Name delivers power over that
person. What it really means is that, if you know the person’s
psychology, you can gain an advantage over him. It is also well known
that the side that controls the language of an argument controls the
argument. As an example, Hamas terrorists and their enablers refer to Israel’s military as an “occupation force” and terrorisitic violence against civilians as “resistance.”

We have long sought a single word that strips the enemy of all
humanity, and reduces him to something less than an animal that is
worthy of nothing less than extermination. As far as we know, the
English language contains no such word, although “dreck” (garbage or refuse) comes close. “Homo sapiens by BIRTH, subhuman by CHOICE”
describes Islamic supremacists perfectly, but it is a phrase and not a
word. We now propose to refer to Islamic supremacists as nithings or
nidings: a Scandinavian word that strips its object of all humanity. Webster’s dictionary (1913) defines it as “A coward; a dastard; — a
term of utmost opprobrium.”

We remind readers who object to the dehumanization of Islamic
supremacists that those enemies are already attempting to dehumanize
Jews, and to a lesser degree Christians, with images that could have
come directly from Adolf Hitler. As they have chosen to sow the
dragon’s teeth, our position is that they must now reap their rightful harvest: the complete hatred and loathing of all civilized human
beings.
nithings

Nithing or niding was more than a common insult, because Scandinavian culture required its subject to fight a duel with the accuser or
become an outlaw: totally devoid of rights, honor, and even
recognition as a human being. Per the Wikipedia entry,

The actual meaning of the adjective argr or ragr [= Anglo-Saxon
earg] was the nature or appearance of effeminacy, especially by
obscene acts. Argr was the worst, most derogatory swearword of all
known to the Norse language. According to Icelandic law, the accused
was expected to kill the accuser at once. …If the accused did not
retort by violent attack yielding either the accuser to take his words
back or the accuser’s death, he was hence proven to be a weak and
cowardly nithing by not retorting accordingly.

A nithing was devoid of all human rights, and he was considered the
enemy of civilized humanity: a perfect depiction of Islamic
supremacists. The word therefore strips the enemy of all humanity, and
degrades him to the status of a wolf or strangler (per Scandinavian
tradition) or a virulent disease like the Black Plague. Black Plague
is a deadly and contagious disease whose vector consists of plague-
carrying rats, while the Green Plague of militant “Islam” is a deadly
and contagious ideology that is spread by bipedal rats: nidings or
nithings, non-humans that raise violent hands to all of civilized
Humanity.

The immediate consequence of being proven a nithing was
outlawing. The outlawed did not have any rights, he was exlex (Latin
for “outside of the legal system”), in Anglo-Saxon utlah, Middle Low
German uutlagh, Old Norse utlagr. Just as feud yielded enmity among
kinships, outlawry yielded enmity of all humanity.[63] …”Yet that is
but one aspect of outlawry. The outlaw is not only expelled from the
kinship, he is also regarded henceforth as an enemy to mankind.”

The actual definition of a nithing is somewhat more involved and
complex, and it gets into sexual perversions and zoomorphical
transformations (Loki’s transformation of himself into a mare to have
sexual intercourse with a stallion, and thus beget Odin’s horse
Sleipner is probably an example), but the following line is pertinent:
“The nithing used its malicious seid magic to destroy anything owned
and made by man, ultimately the human race and Midgard itself[6], due
to its basically unlimited envy, hate, and malice that were nith.”

"Destruction of everything owned and made by Man” (the Palestinians’ destruction of the greenhouses in Gaza comes to mind immediately) and “unlimited envy, hate, and malice” describe militant “Islam”
perfectly, and further underscore the application of nithing or niding
to describe it. The propensity for mindless destruction also appears
in Orson Scott Card’s Alvin Maker series, in which a supernatural
enemy is known as the Unmaker: a personification of evil that is the
total antithesis of God the Creator.

The Unmaker is the main antagonist in Orson Scott Card’s
alternate history/fantasy series The Tales of Alvin Maker. Never
directly confronted, it is a supernatural force that breaks apart
matter and aims to destroy and consume everything and everyone. …To
make something is to oppose the Unmaker, but a point often made is
that this is futile. By natural law the Unmaker can tear down faster
than any man can build.

This also is an outstanding definition of militant “Islam” or Islamic supremacy: an ideology that seeks to destroy everything into which it
comes in contact, and with which no reason, negotiation, or compromise
is possible.

In summary, a nithing or niding is the enemy of Civilization, a
subhuman (through its behavioral choices, and emphatically NOT due to
its racial or ethnic origin) monster with total hatred and malice
toward all human industry and arts, and worthy of nothing but
extermination like any virulent disease. This is the word we will now
apply to Islamic supremacists and their enablers, and we encourage
others to do likewise.
HeartDoc Andrew's profile photo

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: alt.bible.prophecy, uk.legal, uk.politics.misc
XPost: alt.christnet.christianlife

(Oxford) 06/11/24 Again praying w/ Michael here ...

https://narkive.com/YwcK99UN.5

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: alt.bible.prophecy, uk.legal, uk.politics.misc
XPost: alt.christnet.christianlife

Disgusted of Tunbridge Wells2 days ago

ReplyPermalinkOn Tue, 11 Jun 2024 19:05:16 -0700, Michael Ejercito\

Quack Andrew B. Chung = SHEIN = Anita = jew paedophile BARRY 'jewface'

The Foreskin PEELER never had a chance against us Humans. That's why
he slitherered away like all the other jewlovers!

Nithing, the Peeler was your dominator, humiliator, and tormentor!

Gook, the Foreskin PEELER was your lover, fiancee and ainlunguist. And
a JOKE. As a subhuman grik he was INELIGIBLE to dominate, humiliate or torment Humans.

I observed him repeatedly tormenting, humiliating, and dominating you!

The following article explains your pathology.



http://archive.boston.com/bostonglobe/editorial_opinion/oped/articles/2009/03/11/historys_oldest_hatred/


History's oldest hatred
By Jeff Jacoby
Globe Columnist / March 11, 2009
Email|Print|Single Page||Text size – +

ANTI-SEMITISM is an ancient derangement, the oldest of hatreds, so
it is strange that it lacks a more meaningful name. The misnomer "anti-Semitism" - a term coined in 1879 by the German agitator Wilhelm
Marr, who wanted a scientific-sounding euphemism for Judenhass, or
Jew-hatred - is particularly inane, since hostility to Jews has never
had anything to do with Semites or being Semitic.

Perhaps there is no good name for a virus as mutable as anti-Semitism.
"The Jews have been objects of hatred in pagan, religious, and secular societies," write Joseph Telushkin and Dennis Prager in "Why the Jews?,"
their classic study of anti-Semitism. "Fascists have accused them of
being Communists, and Communists have branded them capitalists. Jews who
live in non-Jewish societies have been accused of having dual loyalties,
while Jews who live in the Jewish state have been condemned as
'racists.' Poor Jews are bullied, and rich Jews are resented. Jews have
been branded as both rootless cosmopolitans and ethnic chauvinists. Jews
who assimilate have been called a 'fifth column,' while those who stay
together spark hatred for remaining separate."

There was Jew-hatred before there was Christianity or Islam, before
Nazism or Communism, before Zionism or the Middle East conflict. This
week Jews celebrate the festival of Purim, gathering in synagogues to
read the biblical book of Esther. Set in ancient Persia, it tells of
Haman, a powerful royal adviser who is insulted when the Jewish sage
Mordechai refuses to bow down to him. Haman resolves to wipe out the
empire's Jews and makes the case for genocide in an appeal to the king:

"There is a certain people scattered and dispersed among . . . all the provinces of your kingdom, and their laws are different from those of
other peoples, and the king's laws they do not keep, so it is of no
benefit for the king to tolerate them. If it please the king, let it be
written that they be destroyed."

When the king agrees, Haman makes plans "to annihilate, to kill and
destroy all the Jews, the young and the elderly, children and women, in
one day . . . and to take their property for plunder."

What drives such bloodlust? Haman's indictment accuses the Jews of
lacking national loyalty, of insinuating themselves throughout the
empire, of flouting the king's law. But the Jews of Persia had done
nothing to justify Haman's murderous anti-Semitism - just as Jews in
later ages did nothing that justified their persecution under the Church
or Islam, or their repression at the hands of Russian czars and Soviet commissars, or their slaughter by Nazi Germany. When the president of
Iran today calls for the extirpation of the Jewish state, when firebombs
are hurled at synagogues in London and Paris and Chicago, it is not
because Jews deserve to be victimized.

Many Jews are no saints, but the paranoid frenzy that is anti-Semitism
is not explained by what Jews do, but by what they are. They are the
object of anti-Semitism, not its cause. That is why the haters'
rationales can be so wildly inconsistent and their agendas so
contradictory. What do those who vilify Jews as greedy bankers have in
common with those who revile them as fiendish Bolsheviks? Nothing, save
an irrational obsession with Jews.

At one point, Haman lets the mask slip. He boasts to his friends and
family of "the glory of his riches, and the great number of his sons,
and everything in which the king had promoted him and elevated him."
Still, he seethes with rage and frustration: "Yet all this is worthless
to me so long as I see Mordechai the Jew sitting at the king's gate."
That is the unforgivable offense: "Mordechai the Jew" refuses to blend
in, to be just like everyone else. He goes on sitting there -
undigested, unassimilated, and therefore unbearable.

Of course Haman had his ostensible reasons for targeting Jews. So did Hitler and Arafat, so does Ahmadinejad. Sometimes the anti-Semite
focuses on the Jew's religion, sometimes on his laws and lifestyle,
sometimes on his professional achievements. Under it all, however, it is
the Jew's Jewishness that the anti-Semite cannot abide.

With all their flaws and failings, the Jewish people endure, their role
in history not yet finished. So the world's oldest hatred endures too,
as obsessive and indestructible - and deadly - as ever.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: alt.bible.prophecy, uk.legal, uk.politics.misc
XPost: alt.christnet.christianlife

(Oxford) 06/15/24 Again praying w/ Michael here ...

https://narkive.com/YwcK99UN.5

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: alt.bible.prophecy, uk.legal, uk.politics.misc
XPost: alt.christnet.christianlife

HeartDoc Andrew

ReplyPermalink<Oxford> 06/11/24 Quack/KK again vainjangling (1 Tim 1:6) ...

https://narkive.com/GHNKXeiE.10

Link to post explicating vainjangling by the eternally condemned: https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.med.cardiology/O23NguTslhI/-xLGqnNjAAAJ

"Like a moth to flame, the eternally condemned tragically return to be
ever more cursed by GOD."

Shall we count the ways?

- He calls us gooks
- He defames the Judenvolk
- He calls Christopher Charles Morton an ape
- He denies the Holocaust
- He is obsessed with rectums, ani, and shit
- He denies that we are Americans
- He blames rape victims for their rapes
- He accuses David Bowie and Doutzen Kroes of bestiality
- he accuses us of being illegal aliens
- He called the kidnapping, captivity, and repeated rapes of
Elizabeth Smart a sexual adventure
- He supports strangling babies

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)