XPost: alt.bible.prophecy, uk.legal, uk.politics.misc

https://www.reddit.com/r/LockdownSkepticism/comments/1e6p8u5/covid_inquiry_report_finds_significant_flaws_in/

UK 'failed citizens' with flawed pandemic plans
21 hours ago
By Nick Triggle,
Health correspondent,
@nicktriggle
•
Jim Reed,
Health reporter

Share
Getty Images A person paints on a heart at the National Covid Memorial
wall Getty Images
Significant flaws in the UK’s pandemic planning meant Covid caused more deaths and economic costs than it should have, the first report of the
Covid Inquiry says.
The 217-page report called for radical reform of the systems, saying the
UK government and devolved nations “failed their citizens”.
It said the UK planned for the wrong pandemic – a mild one where spread
of a new virus was inevitable - and this led to the UK turning to “untested” lockdowns.
Part of the blame, it said, was groupthink by scientists and too little challenge from ministers.
How the UK planned for the wrong pandemic
Government ‘failed its citizens’ on Covid by planning for wrong
pandemic, report finds
What is the UK Covid inquiry and what powers does it have?
However, it also pointed out the UK lacked resilience – with high rates
of ill-health and public services running close to, if not beyond, capacity.
By the end of 2023, 235,000 people had died from Covid.
This is the first of at least nine inquiry reports covering everything
from political decision-making to vaccines.
Inquiry chair Baroness Hallett said the UK was “ill-prepared for dealing
with a catastrophic emergency, let alone the coronavirus pandemic”.
“Never again can a disease be allowed to lead to so many deaths and so
much suffering,” she added.
Her report makes a series of recommendations, including:
Taking responsibility for pandemic planning away from the Department of
Health and Social Care, which leads for the UK
Creating a ministerial-level body in each nation, chaired by the leader
or deputy leader, with responsibility for all types of civil emergency
that every department feeds into
A new independent body to advise on civil emergencies and assess the
state of preparation and resilience, which includes both socio-economic
and scientific expertise
Three-yearly pandemic response exercises to stress-test plans in place
Baroness Hallett said she wants to see her recommendations acted on
quickly, with many in place within six months or a year.
“The expert evidence suggests it is not a question of if another
pandemic will strike, but when," she added.
'They failed everyone'
The families and loved-ones of those who died from Covid have welcomed publication of the report.
Prof Naomi Fulop, a spokeswoman for the Covid 19 Bereaved Families for
Justice group , said the report was “hard-hitting and clear-sighted” and urged the new government to adopt the recommendations.
However, she said the inquiry did not go far enough in terms of what
undermined the UK’s ability to respond – the inequalities within society and the state of public services.
“Even the best-laid plans won’t save lives unless they address, rather
than just account for, the conditions that led to our inability to
respond quickly, equitably and effectively.”
Kazeema Afzal, who lost her sister Areema Nasreen, who at 36 was one of
the youngest NHS workers to die with Covid when she lost her life at the
start of the pandemic, told BBC Newsbeat that healthcare workers were unprepared.
"They failed everyone," she said.
"The families that lost their loved ones - they were failed. The people
that worked in the NHS 100% agree with that.
"We've lost a nurse that worked from the heart - Areema was passionate
about her job.
"She's not here now and she would have done so much. She would have made
a huge difference in NHS services."
SUPPLIED Areema Nasreen with her sister SUPPLIED
Areema Nasreen (right) and her sister Kazeema Afzal (left) worked at a
hospital in the West Midlands
The wrong strategy
Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer said: "My heartfelt sympathies go out to
all those who lost a loved one during that time.
“The report confirms what many have always believed - that the UK was under-prepared.
“The safety and security of the country should always be the first
priority - and this government is committed to learning the lessons and
putting better measures in place to protect and prepare us."
Baroness Hallett's report contrasted the approach taken by the UK with countries in East Asia which had learnt from outbreaks of two
coronaviruses – Sars and Mers – over the past two decades.
They had plans in place to quickly ramp up test-and-trace systems, and established processes for quarantine.
This significantly slowed the spread of Covid, limiting the impact of
the pandemic in the first few months and, in places, limiting the use of lockdowns.
Instead, the UK pandemic strategy dated back to 2011 and was based on
the idea that spread of a new virus was inevitable, rather than one
already known about.
PA Media Baroness HallettPA Media
This is Baroness Hallet's first Covid Inquiry report - at least another
eight will follow
The report said the UK government and its advisers had been “lulled”
into a false sense of security by the swine flu pandemic of 2011, which
turned out to be mild.
Her report said the UK needed to be ready to scale up test-and-trace
systems as well as surge NHS capacity in the future.
It also called for plans to be put in place to protect the most
vulnerable people.
Groupthink
The report said part of the blame for these failings lay with the
groupthink that was prevalent in its planning.
The scientific advice received by ministers was too narrowly focused and
there was too little consideration given to the socio-economic impacts,
it said.
The report said ministers did not do enough to challenge what they were
being told, and there was not sufficient freedom or autonomy in the way
the various advisory groups were set up for dissenting voices to be heard.
The creation of an independent body drawing in expertise from science, economics and society would help rectify that, the report said.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: alt.bible.prophecy, uk.legal, uk.politics.misc
XPost: soc.culture.israel

Quack = SHEIN = Anita = sub-louse yidoid PAEDO BARRY Z. SHEIN35
minutes ago

On Fri, 19 Jul 2024 06:37:14 -0700, NOT Michael Ejercito

https://www.reddit.com/r/LockdownSkepticism/comments/1e6p8u5

/covid_inquiry_report_finds_significant_flaws_in/
UK 'failed citizens' with flawed pandemic plans

This has ZERO relevance to you, gook. You're not even ADMISSIBLE to
ENTER the UK!

Mangina, I share an article of interest but instead of addressing
the merits, you call me a gook.

You are a Nazi.

As a Nazi, you are, above all else, a craven coward.

You are afraid to compete with others as equals because you know you
can not measure up.

You are afraid of your own inadequacy, so you want to murder your
betters.

You are afraid of the truth, so you want to murder those who would
tell it.

You are afraid of history, so you want to murder the past, to wipe
out the knowledge of the degeneracy, cowardice and failure of National Socialism.

Finally, you are afraid of the power of educated, informed adults.
Freedom of choice terrifies you… which is why you choose minor children
as sexual partners. You can not interact with competent adults in a consensually sexual way. You need to be able to impose yourself on a
helpless victim, be it a prepubescent boy, or a patient in a mental
hospital.

That is what you are, a Nazi, and there is nothing polite or honest
about it.


Michael

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: alt.bible.prophecy, uk.legal, uk.politics.misc
XPost: soc.culture.israel

Quack = SHEIN = Anita = sub-louse yidoid PAEDO BARRY Z. SHEINa day ago

ReplyPermalinkOn Fri, 19 Jul 2024 07:52:21 -0700, NOT Michael Ejercito

Mangina, I share an article of interest but instead of addressing
the merits, you call me a gook.

Gook, I share a dismissal of the relevance of the article to you and
instead of addressing the merits of my dismissal, you
screech/wail/howl about being called a gook.

Nithing, whether or not the article has any personal relevance to me
is beside the point.

You are a Nazi.

You are a gook.

That would be better than being a Nazi nithing.

As a Nazi, you are, above all else

As a craven gook who zsuckles jew ani, you are, below all else

Again with the ani?

Sometimes, some normal boys and normal men fantasize about fuckling Judenfraulein vulvae.

But who accused you of being a normal man?


Nithing, as long as I am wonderfully hungry.

You are a nithing- homo sapiens by birth, subhuman BY CHOICE. The
key word is CHOICE. You were born with the same human nature as the
rest of us. Your CHOICES made you a nithing.

Bill explains what nithings are.

http://www.israpundit.com/2008/?p=9446

Define and Dehumanize the Enemy: Jihadists as Nithings or Nidings

by Bill Levinson
It is an ancient principle of magic (which modern people recognize as stories that reflect a society’s culture and psychology) that
knowledge of a person’s real or True Name delivers power over that
person. What it really means is that, if you know the person’s
psychology, you can gain an advantage over him. It is also well known
that the side that controls the language of an argument controls the
argument. As an example, Hamas terrorists and their enablers refer to Israel’s military as an “occupation force” and terrorisitic violence against civilians as “resistance.”

We have long sought a single word that strips the enemy of all
humanity, and reduces him to something less than an animal that is
worthy of nothing less than extermination. As far as we know, the
English language contains no such word, although “dreck” (garbage or refuse) comes close. “Homo sapiens by BIRTH, subhuman by CHOICE”
describes Islamic supremacists perfectly, but it is a phrase and not a
word. We now propose to refer to Islamic supremacists as nithings or
nidings: a Scandinavian word that strips its object of all humanity. Webster’s dictionary (1913) defines it as “A coward; a dastard; — a
term of utmost opprobrium.”

We remind readers who object to the dehumanization of Islamic
supremacists that those enemies are already attempting to dehumanize
Jews, and to a lesser degree Christians, with images that could have
come directly from Adolf Hitler. As they have chosen to sow the
dragon’s teeth, our position is that they must now reap their rightful harvest: the complete hatred and loathing of all civilized human
beings.
nithings

Nithing or niding was more than a common insult, because Scandinavian culture required its subject to fight a duel with the accuser or
become an outlaw: totally devoid of rights, honor, and even
recognition as a human being. Per the Wikipedia entry,

The actual meaning of the adjective argr or ragr [= Anglo-Saxon
earg] was the nature or appearance of effeminacy, especially by
obscene acts. Argr was the worst, most derogatory swearword of all
known to the Norse language. According to Icelandic law, the accused
was expected to kill the accuser at once. …If the accused did not
retort by violent attack yielding either the accuser to take his words
back or the accuser’s death, he was hence proven to be a weak and
cowardly nithing by not retorting accordingly.

A nithing was devoid of all human rights, and he was considered the
enemy of civilized humanity: a perfect depiction of Islamic
supremacists. The word therefore strips the enemy of all humanity, and
degrades him to the status of a wolf or strangler (per Scandinavian
tradition) or a virulent disease like the Black Plague. Black Plague
is a deadly and contagious disease whose vector consists of plague-
carrying rats, while the Green Plague of militant “Islam” is a deadly
and contagious ideology that is spread by bipedal rats: nidings or
nithings, non-humans that raise violent hands to all of civilized
Humanity.

The immediate consequence of being proven a nithing was
outlawing. The outlawed did not have any rights, he was exlex (Latin
for “outside of the legal system”), in Anglo-Saxon utlah, Middle Low
German uutlagh, Old Norse utlagr. Just as feud yielded enmity among
kinships, outlawry yielded enmity of all humanity.[63] …”Yet that is
but one aspect of outlawry. The outlaw is not only expelled from the
kinship, he is also regarded henceforth as an enemy to mankind.”

The actual definition of a nithing is somewhat more involved and
complex, and it gets into sexual perversions and zoomorphical
transformations (Loki’s transformation of himself into a mare to have
sexual intercourse with a stallion, and thus beget Odin’s horse
Sleipner is probably an example), but the following line is pertinent:
“The nithing used its malicious seid magic to destroy anything owned
and made by man, ultimately the human race and Midgard itself[6], due
to its basically unlimited envy, hate, and malice that were nith.”

"Destruction of everything owned and made by Man” (the Palestinians’ destruction of the greenhouses in Gaza comes to mind immediately) and “unlimited envy, hate, and malice” describe militant “Islam”
perfectly, and further underscore the application of nithing or niding
to describe it. The propensity for mindless destruction also appears
in Orson Scott Card’s Alvin Maker series, in which a supernatural
enemy is known as the Unmaker: a personification of evil that is the
total antithesis of God the Creator.

The Unmaker is the main antagonist in Orson Scott Card’s
alternate history/fantasy series The Tales of Alvin Maker. Never
directly confronted, it is a supernatural force that breaks apart
matter and aims to destroy and consume everything and everyone. …To
make something is to oppose the Unmaker, but a point often made is
that this is futile. By natural law the Unmaker can tear down faster
than any man can build.

This also is an outstanding definition of militant “Islam” or Islamic supremacy: an ideology that seeks to destroy everything into which it
comes in contact, and with which no reason, negotiation, or compromise
is possible.

In summary, a nithing or niding is the enemy of Civilization, a
subhuman (through its behavioral choices, and emphatically NOT due to
its racial or ethnic origin) monster with total hatred and malice
toward all human industry and arts, and worthy of nothing but
extermination like any virulent disease. This is the word we will now
apply to Islamic supremacists and their enablers, and we encourage
others to do likewise.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)