https://ethicsalarms.com/2024/08/09/another-day-another-fact-free-anti-trump-smear-from-the-axis/#more-130814
Another Day, Another Fact-Free Anti-Trump Smear From The Axis
August 9, 2024 / Jack Marshall
One can safely add Yahoo! and the Los Angeles Times to the massive list
of media organs that are ethically estopped from calling Donald Trump a >habitual liar, since they habitually lie about him.
The most recent example comes from the Times uncritically and
deceptively reporting on a series of hyper-partisan, hysterical rants by >LGTBQ+ Democrats in San Francisco (well, its San Francisco). Yahoo! then >circulated the propaganda under its own banner online. Like the good
little Axis of Unethical Conduct members they are, the LA Times and
Yahoo! dutifully reported pure Trump Derangement fiction as news, and it
was biased, dishonest, unethical journalism from the headline to the finish.
Which, ironically, is not news either. This is how the news media has
been operating where Trump is involved for ten years. This is how it
plans on winning the Presidency for the Democrats again.
The headline is Our lives are on the line: Why many LGBTQ+ people
hope for a Harris win. Not one LGBTQ+ Americans life is on the line
in this election by any stretch of the imagination. Trump does not
oppose gay rights or same sex marriage. He has made it clear that he
believes in treating such citizens as anyone else should be treated. >Believing, as most conservatives, Republicans and people who havent
been brainwashed or bullied do, that LGBTQ+ lifestyle propaganda does
not belong in public school classes does not endanger LGBTQ+ rights or
lives.
But the Times (and then Yahoo!) lied, because thats what progressive >journalism does now. It begins,
At a recent celebration of San Franciscos vibrant transgender past,
one speaker after another directed the crowds attention to a worrisome >future, casting Novembers presidential election as a turning point for
the LGBTQ+ community and the nation as a whole.
Whats a vibrant transgender past? Thats not journalism, thats hype,
and a competent editor would red-pencil it. The fact that a group of >hard-core, leftist activists see a worrisome future doesnt make it
ethical for the Times to report that assessment as fact. Directed the >crowds attention to what they believe is a worrisome future is
reporting, journalism. The way the Times stated it is advocacy.
This election will determine our fate, said Sofa Sabina Ros
Dorantes, deputy director of El/La Para TransLatinas, a local advocacy >organization. It will determine whether we continue to face
discrimination and marginalization at [a] disproportionate rate, or
whether we can continue walking toward the recognition and respect we >deserve.
There is literally no basis for any of that claim, and a news outlet is >obligated to say so. How will this election do any of that? There is
less discrimination against gays and same sex couples now than at any
time in our history. Trump doesnt mention gay rights and gay marriage.
The sole matters of contention that do occupy the attention of
conservatives are 1) the strange, anti-female obsession of parts of the >radical Left with allowing trans athletes to compete against girls and
women in sports where size and strength is an advantage, and 2) the fad
of imposing gender-affirming care on minors who have become confused
about their gender identity in the midst of an indoctrination campaign. >Opposing the first is not advocating discrimination and
marginalization, just fairness and common sense. Opposing the second is >expressing legitimate concern for the health of children whose lives are
at risk of being distorted by politics.
If the Times were interested in journalism rather than allying with >activists, it would not use the intentionally deceptive cover-phrase
gender affirming care to mean giving children puberty blockers,
steroids and irreversible unnecessary surgical procedures because they
have been convinced that they are the wrong sex.
Trumps decision to ban transsexuals from military service is the only >substantive policy that LGBTQ+ can point to as having an arguably
adverse effect on a small component of their groups rights. How many
people are we talking about here? Since the only purpose of the military
is national defense, the determination that including this tiny,
inherently confusing and arguably emotionally disturbed minority in our
armed forces is unwise is hardly constitutes an existential threat to
the entire LGBTQ+ community or their rights.
The lying is flagrant: The Times hops on the contrived Project 25
hysteria, but gets truly deceptive in its links. Dangerous links to a
story about Republicans opposing the extreme trans agenda. How is >disagreement over allowing children to decide to be permanently altered >dangerous to the LGBTQ community? (Any dissent from leftist cant is >dangerous. I get it.)
I checked the last two links in this paragraph:
In three months, Americans will choose between Vice President Kamala
Harris, who is a Bay Area native and longtime LGBTQ+ ally, and former >President Trump, who has a long record of attacking queer rights and has >aligned himself with some of the nations most virulently anti-LGBTQ+ >political groups.
Trumps record of attacking LGBTQ rights linked to a story about Trump >criticizing Bidens obnoxious decision to salute the (already absurd) >Transgender Day of Visibility on Easter. There is no right to have
your group recognized by the President on Easter. And, as in the rest of
the Times hit piece, by LGBTQ the Times only meant the T. Solidarity
is admirable, but lying and deceit are not. Challenging an extreme trans >agenda does not threaten LGBTQ rights. It is the illogical equivalent of >claiming that the extreme pit bull breed bans in many cities endanger
all dogs.
Aligned himself is worse. Trump has accepted the endorsement of
religious groups and evangelicals who follow moral imperatives in their >faiths that gays dont like-as if the Democrats wouldnt love to have
the endorsements of any of these groups. Accepting the endorsement of a
group does not mean a candidate accepts all the positions of that group,
and the Times knows that. Nonetheless, it intentionally deceives its
readers because its Axis allies do.
This is how the mainstream media is attempting to rig the electionwell,
one of many ways.
https://ethicsalarms.com/2024/08/09/another-day-another-fact-free-anti-trump-smear-from-the-axis/#more-130814
Another Day, Another Fact-Free Anti-Trump Smear From The Axis
August 9, 2024 / Jack Marshall
<FLUSH CHIMP CHATTER>
HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
Subject: The LORD says "Blessed are you who hunger now ..."
Shame on andrew, look at his red face.
He is trying to pull a fast one. His scripture bit is found among these:
'14 Bible verses about Spiritual Hunger'
Psalms
81:10 I am the LORD thy God, which brought thee out of the land of Egypt: >open thy mouth wide, and I will fill it.
Proverbs
13:25 The righteous has enough to satisfy his appetite, But the stomach of >the wicked is in need.
Joel
2:26 And ye shall eat in plenty, and be satisfied, and praise the name of
the LORD your God, that hath dealt wondrously with you: and my
people shall never be ashamed.
Psalms
107 For he satisfies the thirsty and fills the hungry with good things.
Acts
14:17 "Yet he did not leave himself without witness, for he did good by >giving you rains from heaven and fruitful seasons, satisfying
your hearts with food and gladness."
someone eternally condemned & ever more cursed by GOD perseverated:
HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
Subject: a very very very simple definition of sin ...
Does andrew's "definition" agree with scripture? Let's see in 1 John:
John wrote this to christians. The greek grammer (sic) speaks of an ongoing >> status. He includes himself in that status.
1:8 If we say that we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, and the truth is
not in us.
1:9 If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just to forgive us our sins, >> and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness.
1:10 If we say that we have not sinned, we make him a liar, and his word is >> not in us.
ReplyPermalinkMangina, there is nothing ape about Jack.
Post by Loose Cannon
If you're making a point, try posting something a White person wrote.Right!
Nobody gives a shit what some uppity ape with a keyboard thinks.
Michael Ejercito wrote:
https://ethicsalarms.com/2024/08/09/another-day-another-fact-free-anti-trump-smear-from-the-axis/#more-130814
Another Day, Another Fact-Free Anti-Trump Smear From The Axis
August 9, 2024 / Jack Marshall
One can safely add Yahoo! and the Los Angeles Times to the massive list
of media organs that are ethically estopped from calling Donald Trump a
habitual liar, since they habitually lie about him.
The most recent example comes from the Times uncritically and
deceptively reporting on a series of hyper-partisan, hysterical rants by
LGTBQ+ Democrats in San Francisco (well, its San Francisco). Yahoo! then
circulated the propaganda under its own banner online. Like the good
little Axis of Unethical Conduct members they are, the LA Times and
Yahoo! dutifully reported pure Trump Derangement fiction as news, and it
was biased, dishonest, unethical journalism from the headline to the finish. >>
Which, ironically, is not news either. This is how the news media has
been operating where Trump is involved for ten years. This is how it
plans on winning the Presidency for the Democrats again.
The headline is “‘Our lives are on the line’: Why many LGBTQ+ people >> hope for a Harris win.” Not one LGBTQ+ American’s “life is on the line”
in this election by any stretch of the imagination. Trump does not
oppose gay rights or same sex marriage. He has made it clear that he
believes in treating such citizens as anyone else should be treated.
Believing, as most conservatives, Republicans and people who haven’t
been brainwashed or bullied do, that LGBTQ+ lifestyle propaganda does
not belong in public school classes does not endanger LGBTQ+ rights or
lives.
But the Times (and then Yahoo!) lied, because that’s what progressive
journalism does now. It begins,
“At a recent celebration of San Francisco’s vibrant transgender past,
one speaker after another directed the crowd’s attention to a worrisome
future, casting November’s presidential election as a turning point for
the LGBTQ+ community and the nation as a whole.”
What’s a “vibrant transgender past”? That’s not journalism, that’s hype,
and a competent editor would red-pencil it. The fact that a group of
hard-core, leftist activists see a “worrisome” future doesn’t make it >> ethical for the Times to report that assessment as fact. “Directed the
crowd’s attention to what they believe is a worrisome future” is
reporting, journalism. The way the Times stated it is advocacy.
“This election will determine our fate,” said Sofía Sabina Ríos
Dorantes, deputy director of El/La Para TransLatinas, a local advocacy
organization. “It will determine whether we continue to face
discrimination and marginalization at [a] disproportionate rate, or
whether we can continue walking toward the recognition and respect we
deserve.”
There is literally no basis for any of that claim, and a news outlet is
obligated to say so. How will this election do any of that? There is
less discrimination against gays and same sex couples now than at any
time in our history. Trump doesn’t mention gay rights and gay marriage.
The sole matters of contention that do occupy the attention of
conservatives are 1) the strange, anti-female obsession of parts of the
radical Left with allowing trans athletes to compete against girls and
women in sports where size and strength is an advantage, and 2) the fad
of imposing “gender-affirming care” on minors who have become confused >> about their gender identity in the midst of an indoctrination campaign.
Opposing the first is not advocating “discrimination and
marginalization,” just fairness and common sense. Opposing the second is >> expressing legitimate concern for the health of children whose lives are
at risk of being distorted by politics.
If the Times were interested in journalism rather than allying with
activists, it would not use the intentionally deceptive cover-phrase
“gender affirming care” to mean “giving children puberty blockers,
steroids and irreversible unnecessary surgical procedures because they
have been convinced that they are the ‘wrong’ sex.”
Trump’s decision to ban transsexuals from military service is the only
substantive policy that LGBTQ+ can point to as having an arguably
adverse effect on a small component of their group’s rights. How many
people are we talking about here? Since the only purpose of the military
is national defense, the determination that including this tiny,
inherently confusing and arguably emotionally disturbed minority in our
armed forces is unwise is hardly constitutes an existential threat to
the entire LGBTQ+ community or their rights.
The lying is flagrant: The Times hops on the contrived “Project 25”
hysteria, but gets truly deceptive in its links. “Dangerous” links to a >> story about Republicans opposing the extreme trans agenda. How is
disagreement over allowing children to decide to be permanently altered
“dangerous” to the LGBTQ community? (Any dissent from leftist cant is
“dangerous.” I get it.)
I checked the last two links in this paragraph:
“In three months, Americans will choose between Vice President Kamala
Harris, who is a Bay Area native and longtime LGBTQ+ ally, and former
President Trump, who has a long record of attacking queer rights and has
aligned himself with some of the nation’s most virulently anti-LGBTQ+
political groups.”
Trump’s “record” of attacking LGBTQ rights linked to a story about Trump
criticizing Biden’s obnoxious decision to salute the (already absurd)
“Transgender Day of Visibility” on Easter. There is no “right” to have
your group recognized by the President on Easter. And, as in the rest of
the Times hit piece, by “LGBTQ” the Times only meant the “T.” Solidarity
is admirable, but lying and deceit are not. Challenging an extreme trans
agenda does not threaten LGBTQ rights. It is the illogical equivalent of
claiming that the extreme pit bull breed bans in many cities “endanger
all dogs.”
“Aligned himself‘ is worse. Trump has accepted the endorsement of
religious groups and evangelicals who follow moral imperatives in their
faiths that gays don’t like—-as if the Democrats wouldn’t love to have >> the endorsements of any of these groups. Accepting the endorsement of a
group does not mean a candidate accepts all the positions of that group,
and the Times knows that. Nonetheless, it intentionally deceives its
readers because its Axis allies do.
This is how the mainstream media is attempting to rig the election—well, >> one of many ways.
Meanwhile ...
#TrumpIsTheAntiChrist as proven by Brother Paul via Scripture at https://AntiChrist45.com with 100% certainty so that we can be certain
that #MaGa is his dyslexic #M666 Hellmark.
Bottom line:
Being 100% certain that #TrumpIsTheAntiChrist (see
https://AntiChrist45.com) is being 100% certain of the need to always
be #RaptureReady (see https://bit.ly/RaptureRiddle) now.
Indeed, I am http://WonderfullyHungry.org for food right now (Luke
6:21a) and hope you, Michael, and others reading this, also have a
healthy appetite for food right now too.
So how are you ?
HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
Michael Ejercito wrote:
https://ethicsalarms.com/2024/08/09/another-day-another-fact-free-anti-trump-smear-from-the-axis/#more-130814
Another Day, Another Fact-Free Anti-Trump Smear From The Axis
August 9, 2024 / Jack Marshall
One can safely add Yahoo! and the Los Angeles Times to the massive list
of media organs that are ethically estopped from calling Donald Trump a
habitual liar, since they habitually lie about him.
The most recent example comes from the Times uncritically and
deceptively reporting on a series of hyper-partisan, hysterical rants by >>> LGTBQ+ Democrats in San Francisco (well, its San Francisco). Yahoo! then >>> circulated the propaganda under its own banner online. Like the good
little Axis of Unethical Conduct members they are, the LA Times and
Yahoo! dutifully reported pure Trump Derangement fiction as news, and it >>> was biased, dishonest, unethical journalism from the headline to the finish.
Which, ironically, is not news either. This is how the news media has
been operating where Trump is involved for ten years. This is how it
plans on winning the Presidency for the Democrats again.
The headline is Our lives are on the line: Why many LGBTQ+ people
hope for a Harris win. Not one LGBTQ+ Americans life is on the line
in this election by any stretch of the imagination. Trump does not
oppose gay rights or same sex marriage. He has made it clear that he
believes in treating such citizens as anyone else should be treated.
Believing, as most conservatives, Republicans and people who havent
been brainwashed or bullied do, that LGBTQ+ lifestyle propaganda does
not belong in public school classes does not endanger LGBTQ+ rights or
lives.
But the Times (and then Yahoo!) lied, because thats what progressive
journalism does now. It begins,
At a recent celebration of San Franciscos vibrant transgender past,
one speaker after another directed the crowds attention to a worrisome
future, casting Novembers presidential election as a turning point for
the LGBTQ+ community and the nation as a whole.
Whats a vibrant transgender past? Thats not journalism, thats hype, >>> and a competent editor would red-pencil it. The fact that a group of
hard-core, leftist activists see a worrisome future doesnt make it
ethical for the Times to report that assessment as fact. Directed the
crowds attention to what they believe is a worrisome future is
reporting, journalism. The way the Times stated it is advocacy.
This election will determine our fate, said Sofa Sabina Ros
Dorantes, deputy director of El/La Para TransLatinas, a local advocacy
organization. It will determine whether we continue to face
discrimination and marginalization at [a] disproportionate rate, or
whether we can continue walking toward the recognition and respect we
deserve.
There is literally no basis for any of that claim, and a news outlet is
obligated to say so. How will this election do any of that? There is
less discrimination against gays and same sex couples now than at any
time in our history. Trump doesnt mention gay rights and gay marriage.
The sole matters of contention that do occupy the attention of
conservatives are 1) the strange, anti-female obsession of parts of the
radical Left with allowing trans athletes to compete against girls and
women in sports where size and strength is an advantage, and 2) the fad
of imposing gender-affirming care on minors who have become confused
about their gender identity in the midst of an indoctrination campaign.
Opposing the first is not advocating discrimination and
marginalization, just fairness and common sense. Opposing the second is >>> expressing legitimate concern for the health of children whose lives are >>> at risk of being distorted by politics.
If the Times were interested in journalism rather than allying with
activists, it would not use the intentionally deceptive cover-phrase
gender affirming care to mean giving children puberty blockers,
steroids and irreversible unnecessary surgical procedures because they
have been convinced that they are the wrong sex.
Trumps decision to ban transsexuals from military service is the only
substantive policy that LGBTQ+ can point to as having an arguably
adverse effect on a small component of their groups rights. How many
people are we talking about here? Since the only purpose of the military >>> is national defense, the determination that including this tiny,
inherently confusing and arguably emotionally disturbed minority in our
armed forces is unwise is hardly constitutes an existential threat to
the entire LGBTQ+ community or their rights.
The lying is flagrant: The Times hops on the contrived Project 25
hysteria, but gets truly deceptive in its links. Dangerous links to a
story about Republicans opposing the extreme trans agenda. How is
disagreement over allowing children to decide to be permanently altered
dangerous to the LGBTQ community? (Any dissent from leftist cant is
dangerous. I get it.)
I checked the last two links in this paragraph:
In three months, Americans will choose between Vice President Kamala
Harris, who is a Bay Area native and longtime LGBTQ+ ally, and former
President Trump, who has a long record of attacking queer rights and has >>> aligned himself with some of the nations most virulently anti-LGBTQ+
political groups.
Trumps record of attacking LGBTQ rights linked to a story about Trump >>> criticizing Bidens obnoxious decision to salute the (already absurd)
Transgender Day of Visibility on Easter. There is no right to have
your group recognized by the President on Easter. And, as in the rest of >>> the Times hit piece, by LGBTQ the Times only meant the T. Solidarity >>> is admirable, but lying and deceit are not. Challenging an extreme trans >>> agenda does not threaten LGBTQ rights. It is the illogical equivalent of >>> claiming that the extreme pit bull breed bans in many cities endanger
all dogs.
Aligned himself is worse. Trump has accepted the endorsement of
religious groups and evangelicals who follow moral imperatives in their
faiths that gays dont like-as if the Democrats wouldnt love to have
the endorsements of any of these groups. Accepting the endorsement of a
group does not mean a candidate accepts all the positions of that group, >>> and the Times knows that. Nonetheless, it intentionally deceives its
readers because its Axis allies do.
This is how the mainstream media is attempting to rig the electionwell, >>> one of many ways.
Meanwhile ...
#TrumpIsTheAntiChrist as proven by Brother Paul via Scripture at
https://AntiChrist45.com with 100% certainty so that we can be certain
that #MaGa is his dyslexic #M666 Hellmark.
Bottom line:
Being 100% certain that #TrumpIsTheAntiChrist (see
https://AntiChrist45.com) is being 100% certain of the need to always
be #RaptureReady (see https://bit.ly/RaptureRiddle) now.
Indeed, I am http://WonderfullyHungry.org for food right now (Luke
6:21a) and hope you, Michael, and others reading this, also have a
healthy appetite for food right now too.
So how are you ?
I am wonderfully hungry!
On Sat, 10 Aug 2024 08:47:18 -0700, NOT Michael EjercitoYou kicked no one.
Mangina, there is nothing ape about Jack.Needledick, Jack IS an ape.
Post by Michael Ejercito
And I will always remember how the Shadow dominated you andI will always remember how I kicked David the jewloving Shadow off
humiliated you!
this group. He never showed his shabbos goy face here again!
Enjoy THIS, gook (that could be YOU): https://xhamster.com/videos/israeli-jewish-girl-sucking-big-black-cock-xh9YOWZLooking at normal sexual relations is fun sometimes.
That would be better than being a Nazi nithing.You are a Nazi.You are a gook
You are a nithing- homo sapiens by birth, subhuman BY CHOICE. TheAs a Nazi, you are, above all elseAs a craven gook who zsuckles jew ani, you are, below all else
ReplyPermalinkOn Sat, 10 Aug 2024 18:59:16 -0700, NOT Michael EjercitoNo Judenfraulein wants your dick.
Too bad we did not see his dick going into her pussy!Now even a genitally mutilated jewgoil wants a nigra dick in her
filthy diseased pussy!
(AntiChrist45) 08/11/24 Again praying w/ Michael here ...
https://narkive.com/TAnXo6CC.8
ReplyPermalinkOn Sun, 11 Aug 2024 10:58:54 -0700, NOT Michael EjercitoNeither Dr. Chung nor I are hiding.
Let us pray!Pray that the 'D' cells in the ICE Five-0's rapture lamps die before
they can uncover where you two gooks are hiding!
HeartDoc Andrew wrote:
(AntiChrist45) 08/11/24 Again praying w/ Michael here ...Let us pray!
https://narkive.com/TAnXo6CC.8
Michael
HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
(AntiChrist45) 08/11/24 Again praying w/ Michael here ...
https://narkive.com/TAnXo6CC.8
Let us pray!
HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
Subject: The LORD says "Blessed are you who hunger now ..."
Shame on andrew, look at his red face.
He is trying to pull a fast one. His scripture bit is found among these:
'14 Bible verses about Spiritual Hunger'
Psalms
81:10 I am the LORD thy God, which brought thee out of the land of Egypt: >open thy mouth wide, and I will fill it.
Proverbs
13:25 The righteous has enough to satisfy his appetite, But the stomach of >the wicked is in need.
Joel
2:26 And ye shall eat in plenty, and be satisfied, and praise the name of
the LORD your God, that hath dealt wondrously with you: and my
people shall never be ashamed.
Psalms
107 For he satisfies the thirsty and fills the hungry with good things.
Acts
14:17 "Yet he did not leave himself without witness, for he did good by >giving you rains from heaven and fruitful seasons, satisfying
your hearts with food and gladness."
someone eternally condemned & ever more cursed by GOD perseverated:
HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
Subject: a very very very simple definition of sin ...
Does andrew's "definition" agree with scripture? Let's see in 1 John:
John wrote this to christians. The greek grammer (sic) speaks of an ongoing >> status. He includes himself in that status.
1:8 If we say that we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, and the truth is
not in us.
1:9 If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just to forgive us our sins, >> and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness.
1:10 If we say that we have not sinned, we make him a liar, and his word is >> not in us.
<AntiChrist45> 08/11/24 Loose/KK again vainjangling (1 Tim 1:6) ...
https://narkive.com/GHNKXeiE.10
Link to post explicating vainjangling by the eternally condemned: https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.med.cardiology/O23NguTslhI/-xLGqnNjAAAJ
"Like a moth to flame, the eternally condemned tragically return to be
ever more cursed by GOD."
Behold in wide-eyed wonder and amazement at the continued fulfillment
of this prophecy as clearly demonstrated within the following USENET
threads:
(1) Link to thread titled "LORD Jesus Christ of Nazareth is our #1
Example of being wonderfully hungry;"
https://groups.google.com/g/sci.med.cardiology/c/_iVmOb7q3_Q/m/E8L7TNNtAgAJ
(2) Link to thread titled "Being wonderfully hungry;"
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/sci.med.cardiology/uCPb3ldOv5M
(3) Link to thread titled "A very very very simple definition of sin;"
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/alt.bible.prophecy/xunFWhan_AM
(4) Link to thread titled "The LORD says 'Blessed are you who hunger
now;'"
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/alt.bible.prophecy/e4sW8dr44rM
(5) Link to thread titled "Being wonderfully hungry like LORD Jesus;"
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.bible.prophecy/xPY1Uzl-ZNk/QeKLDNCpCwAJ
... for the continued benefit (Romans 8:28) of those of us who are http://WonderfullyHungry.org like GOD ( http://bit.ly/Lk2442 ) with
all glory ( http://bit.ly/Psalm112_1 ) to the LORD.
Source: https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.med.cardiology/O23NguTslhI/pIZcsOCJBwAJ
Laus DEO !
HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
<AntiChrist45> 08/11/24 Loose/KK again vainjangling (1 Tim 1:6) ...Let us count the ways.
https://narkive.com/GHNKXeiE.10
Link to post explicating vainjangling by the eternally condemned:
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.med.cardiology/O23NguTslhI/-xLGqnNjAAAJ >>
"Like a moth to flame, the eternally condemned tragically return to be
ever more cursed by GOD."
Behold in wide-eyed wonder and amazement at the continued fulfillment
of this prophecy as clearly demonstrated within the following USENET
threads:
(1) Link to thread titled "LORD Jesus Christ of Nazareth is our #1
Example of being wonderfully hungry;"
https://groups.google.com/g/sci.med.cardiology/c/_iVmOb7q3_Q/m/E8L7TNNtAgAJ >>
(2) Link to thread titled "Being wonderfully hungry;"
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/sci.med.cardiology/uCPb3ldOv5M
(3) Link to thread titled "A very very very simple definition of sin;"
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/alt.bible.prophecy/xunFWhan_AM
(4) Link to thread titled "The LORD says 'Blessed are you who hunger
now;'"
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/alt.bible.prophecy/e4sW8dr44rM
(5) Link to thread titled "Being wonderfully hungry like LORD Jesus;"
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.bible.prophecy/xPY1Uzl-ZNk/QeKLDNCpCwAJ >>
... for the continued benefit (Romans 8:28) of those of us who are
http://WonderfullyHungry.org like GOD ( http://bit.ly/Lk2442 ) with
all glory ( http://bit.ly/Psalm112_1 ) to the LORD.
Source:
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.med.cardiology/O23NguTslhI/pIZcsOCJBwAJ >>
Laus DEO !
- They call us gooks
- They defame the Judenvolk
- They are obsessed with rectums, ani, and shit
- They feel that White is supreme
- They deny the Holocaust
- they call Christopher Charles Morton an ape
- They blame rape victims for their rapes
- They accuse David Bowie and Doutzen Kroes of bestiality
- They celebrate the October 7, 2023 attacks by Hamas
- They call the kidnapping, captivity, and repeated rapes of then
14-year-old Elizabeth Smart a sexual adventure
- They support strangling babies
ReplyPermalinkOn Wed, 14 Aug 2024 08:04:32 -0700, NOT Michael Ejercito <b'ris>It is immoral for you to call me or Dr. Chung or anyone else gooks.
Let us count the ways.Yes, gook: let's.
- They call us gooksYou ARE gooks.
Wrong. It is immoral to defame the Judenvolk. They are all better- They defame the JudenvolkThe judendreckuntervolk deserve nothing less.
You yet again prove, ON THE SPOT, what I wrote about you.- They are obsessed with rectums, ani, and shitYou are obsessed with zsuckling jew diarrhoea out of jew ani,
Wrong.- They feel that White is supremeWhite IS supreme, Shitskins like you and Chung are inferior.
Yes, there was.- They deny the HolocaustThere wasn't one.
Wrong!- they call Christopher Charles Morton an apeChrissie Morton IS an ape.
Wrong!- They blame rape victims for their rapesRape has no victims, only beneficiaries.
There is nothing bestial about their marriages!- They accuse David Bowie and Doutzen Kroes of bestialityTheir bestial 'marriage' is well documented.
Blowback is not genocide, not against Germany, not against Japan,- They celebrate the October 7, 2023 attacks by HamasYOU celebrate the genocide of the population of Gaza by 'Israeel'.
There was nothing sexual adventure about it.- They call the kidnapping, captivity, and repeated rapes of thenIt WAS a sexual adventure: the envy of her classmates.
14-year-old Elizabeth Smart a sexual adventure
- They support strangling babiesThere is nothing subhuman nor bestial about those babies. How can
That's the best thing for the subhuman output of bestiality between
Humans and other species such as gooks.
Andrew B. Chung Ph.D (plagiarised) MD (revoked)about 10 hours ago
ReplyPermalinkOn Wed, 14 Aug 2024 08:04:32 -0700, NOT Michael Ejercito
<b'ris>
Let us count the ways.Yes, gook: let's.
It is immoral for you to call me or Dr. Chung or anyone else gooks.- They call us gooksYou ARE gooks.
Wrong. It is immoral to defame the Judenvolk. They are all better- They defame the JudenvolkThe judendreckuntervolk deserve nothing less.
than you!
You yet again prove, ON THE SPOT, what I wrote about you.- They are obsessed with rectums, ani, and shitYou are obsessed with zsuckling jew diarrhoea out of jew ani,
Sometimes, some normal boys and normal men fantasize about
Judenfraulein vulvae.
But who accused you of being a normal man?
Wrong.- They feel that White is supremeWhite IS supreme, Shitskins like you and Chung are inferior.
Skin color is beside the point!
Your choices and conduct make your character inferior!
Yes, there was.- They deny the HolocaustThere wasn't one.
It weas well-documented by the Nazi nithings themselves!
Wrong!- they call Christopher Charles Morton an apeChrissie Morton IS an ape.
There is nothing ape about Chris!
Wrong!- They blame rape victims for their rapesRape has no victims, only beneficiaries.
There is nothing bestial about their marriages!- They accuse David Bowie and Doutzen Kroes of bestialityTheir bestial 'marriage' is well documented.
Blowback is not genocide, not against Germany, not against Japan,- They celebrate the October 7, 2023 attacks by HamasYOU celebrate the genocide of the population of Gaza by 'Israeel'.
not against Gaza!
There was nothing sexual adventure about it.- They call the kidnapping, captivity, and repeated rapes of thenIt WAS a sexual adventure: the envy of her classmates.
14-year-old Elizabeth Smart a sexual adventure
In her own words, she said about the first time she was raped,"And
afterwards, I'll never forget how I felt. I felt so broken, I felt so >shattered, like I just been smashed into a million tiny little pieces
and nobody could ever put me back together. I remember thinking, maybe
it would be better if I was dead."
She was only fourteen years old!
She will never forget the day, let alone the year, when it happened.
- They support strangling babiesThere is nothing subhuman nor bestial about those babies. How can
That's the best thing for the subhuman output of bestiality between
Humans and other species such as gooks.
there be?
Michael
HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
Subject: The LORD says "Blessed are you who hunger now ..."
Shame on andrew, look at his red face.
He is trying to pull a fast one. His scripture bit is found among these:
'14 Bible verses about Spiritual Hunger'
Psalms
81:10 I am the LORD thy God, which brought thee out of the land of Egypt: >open thy mouth wide, and I will fill it.
Proverbs
13:25 The righteous has enough to satisfy his appetite, But the stomach of >the wicked is in need.
Joel
2:26 And ye shall eat in plenty, and be satisfied, and praise the name of
the LORD your God, that hath dealt wondrously with you: and my
people shall never be ashamed.
Psalms
107 For he satisfies the thirsty and fills the hungry with good things.
Acts
14:17 "Yet he did not leave himself without witness, for he did good by >giving you rains from heaven and fruitful seasons, satisfying
your hearts with food and gladness."
someone eternally condemned & ever more cursed by GOD perseverated:
HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
Subject: a very very very simple definition of sin ...
Does andrew's "definition" agree with scripture? Let's see in 1 John:
John wrote this to christians. The greek grammer (sic) speaks of an ongoing >> status. He includes himself in that status.
1:8 If we say that we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, and the truth is
not in us.
1:9 If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just to forgive us our sins, >> and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness.
1:10 If we say that we have not sinned, we make him a liar, and his word is >> not in us.
HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
Subject: The LORD says "Blessed are you who hunger now ..."
Shame on andrew, look at his red face.
He is trying to pull a fast one. His scripture bit is found among these:
'14 Bible verses about Spiritual Hunger'
Psalms
81:10 I am the LORD thy God, which brought thee out of the land of Egypt: >open thy mouth wide, and I will fill it.
Proverbs
13:25 The righteous has enough to satisfy his appetite, But the stomach of >the wicked is in need.
Joel
2:26 And ye shall eat in plenty, and be satisfied, and praise the name of
the LORD your God, that hath dealt wondrously with you: and my
people shall never be ashamed.
Psalms
107 For he satisfies the thirsty and fills the hungry with good things.
Acts
14:17 "Yet he did not leave himself without witness, for he did good by >giving you rains from heaven and fruitful seasons, satisfying
your hearts with food and gladness."
someone eternally condemned & ever more cursed by GOD perseverated:
HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
Subject: a very very very simple definition of sin ...
Does andrew's "definition" agree with scripture? Let's see in 1 John:
John wrote this to christians. The greek grammer (sic) speaks of an ongoing >> status. He includes himself in that status.
1:8 If we say that we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, and the truth is
not in us.
1:9 If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just to forgive us our sins, >> and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness.
1:10 If we say that we have not sinned, we make him a liar, and his word is >> not in us.
ReplyPermalinkOn Wed, 14 Aug 2024 19:10:43 -0700, NOT Michael EjercitoThere was nothing funny about it.
In her own words, she said about the first time she was raped,"AndLOL!
afterwards, I'll never forget how I felt. I felt so broken, I felt so
shattered, like I just been smashed into a million tiny little pieces
and nobody could ever put me back together. I remember thinking, maybe
it would be better if I was dead."
She was only fourteen years old!Wrong!
Kids like her are fucking their brains out at TWELVE.And remember it FONDLY!
She will never forget the day, let alone the year, when it happened.
HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
Subject: The LORD says "Blessed are you who hunger now ..."
Shame on andrew, look at his red face.
He is trying to pull a fast one. His scripture bit is found among these:
'14 Bible verses about Spiritual Hunger'
Psalms
81:10 I am the LORD thy God, which brought thee out of the land of Egypt: >open thy mouth wide, and I will fill it.
Proverbs
13:25 The righteous has enough to satisfy his appetite, But the stomach of >the wicked is in need.
Joel
2:26 And ye shall eat in plenty, and be satisfied, and praise the name of
the LORD your God, that hath dealt wondrously with you: and my
people shall never be ashamed.
Psalms
107 For he satisfies the thirsty and fills the hungry with good things.
Acts
14:17 "Yet he did not leave himself without witness, for he did good by >giving you rains from heaven and fruitful seasons, satisfying
your hearts with food and gladness."
someone eternally condemned & ever more cursed by GOD perseverated:
HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
Subject: a very very very simple definition of sin ...
Does andrew's "definition" agree with scripture? Let's see in 1 John:
John wrote this to christians. The greek grammer (sic) speaks of an ongoing >> status. He includes himself in that status.
1:8 If we say that we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, and the truth is
not in us.
1:9 If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just to forgive us our sins, >> and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness.
1:10 If we say that we have not sinned, we make him a liar, and his word is >> not in us.
Andrew B. Chung Ph.D (plagiarised) MD (revoked)about 24 hours ago ReplyPermalinkOn Thu, 15 Aug 2024 08:05:35 -0700, NOT Michael EjercitoYou sure like raping young girls.
...
Wrong!Anything BUTT wrong. She enjoyed it every bit as much as the female
jew guests invited to Gaza by Chhhhhhhhhamas on October 7 last year!
HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
Subject: The LORD says "Blessed are you who hunger now ..."
Shame on andrew, look at his red face.
He is trying to pull a fast one. His scripture bit is found among these:
'14 Bible verses about Spiritual Hunger'
Psalms
81:10 I am the LORD thy God, which brought thee out of the land of Egypt: >open thy mouth wide, and I will fill it.
Proverbs
13:25 The righteous has enough to satisfy his appetite, But the stomach of >the wicked is in need.
Joel
2:26 And ye shall eat in plenty, and be satisfied, and praise the name of
the LORD your God, that hath dealt wondrously with you: and my
people shall never be ashamed.
Psalms
107 For he satisfies the thirsty and fills the hungry with good things.
Acts
14:17 "Yet he did not leave himself without witness, for he did good by >giving you rains from heaven and fruitful seasons, satisfying
your hearts with food and gladness."
someone eternally condemned & ever more cursed by GOD perseverated:
HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
Subject: a very very very simple definition of sin ...
Does andrew's "definition" agree with scripture? Let's see in 1 John:
John wrote this to christians. The greek grammer (sic) speaks of an ongoing >> status. He includes himself in that status.
1:8 If we say that we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, and the truth is
not in us.
1:9 If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just to forgive us our sins, >> and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness.
1:10 If we say that we have not sinned, we make him a liar, and his word is >> not in us.
HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
Subject: The LORD says "Blessed are you who hunger now ..."
Shame on andrew, look at his red face.
He is trying to pull a fast one. His scripture bit is found among these:
'14 Bible verses about Spiritual Hunger'
Psalms
81:10 I am the LORD thy God, which brought thee out of the land of Egypt: >open thy mouth wide, and I will fill it.
Proverbs
13:25 The righteous has enough to satisfy his appetite, But the stomach of >the wicked is in need.
Joel
2:26 And ye shall eat in plenty, and be satisfied, and praise the name of
the LORD your God, that hath dealt wondrously with you: and my
people shall never be ashamed.
Psalms
107 For he satisfies the thirsty and fills the hungry with good things.
Acts
14:17 "Yet he did not leave himself without witness, for he did good by >giving you rains from heaven and fruitful seasons, satisfying
your hearts with food and gladness."
someone eternally condemned & ever more cursed by GOD perseverated:
HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
Subject: a very very very simple definition of sin ...
Does andrew's "definition" agree with scripture? Let's see in 1 John:
John wrote this to christians. The greek grammer (sic) speaks of an ongoing >> status. He includes himself in that status.
1:8 If we say that we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, and the truth is
not in us.
1:9 If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just to forgive us our sins, >> and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness.
1:10 If we say that we have not sinned, we make him a liar, and his word is >> not in us.
HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
Subject: The LORD says "Blessed are you who hunger now ..."
Shame on andrew, look at his red face.
He is trying to pull a fast one. His scripture bit is found among these:
'14 Bible verses about Spiritual Hunger'
Psalms
81:10 I am the LORD thy God, which brought thee out of the land of Egypt: >open thy mouth wide, and I will fill it.
Proverbs
13:25 The righteous has enough to satisfy his appetite, But the stomach of >the wicked is in need.
Joel
2:26 And ye shall eat in plenty, and be satisfied, and praise the name of
the LORD your God, that hath dealt wondrously with you: and my
people shall never be ashamed.
Psalms
107 For he satisfies the thirsty and fills the hungry with good things.
Acts
14:17 "Yet he did not leave himself without witness, for he did good by >giving you rains from heaven and fruitful seasons, satisfying
your hearts with food and gladness."
someone eternally condemned & ever more cursed by GOD perseverated:
HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
Subject: a very very very simple definition of sin ...
Does andrew's "definition" agree with scripture? Let's see in 1 John:
John wrote this to christians. The greek grammer (sic) speaks of an ongoing >> status. He includes himself in that status.
1:8 If we say that we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, and the truth is
not in us.
1:9 If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just to forgive us our sins, >> and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness.
1:10 If we say that we have not sinned, we make him a liar, and his word is >> not in us.
HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
Subject: The LORD says "Blessed are you who hunger now ..."
Shame on andrew, look at his red face.
He is trying to pull a fast one. His scripture bit is found among these:
'14 Bible verses about Spiritual Hunger'
Psalms
81:10 I am the LORD thy God, which brought thee out of the land of Egypt: >open thy mouth wide, and I will fill it.
Proverbs
13:25 The righteous has enough to satisfy his appetite, But the stomach of >the wicked is in need.
Joel
2:26 And ye shall eat in plenty, and be satisfied, and praise the name of
the LORD your God, that hath dealt wondrously with you: and my
people shall never be ashamed.
Psalms
107 For he satisfies the thirsty and fills the hungry with good things.
Acts
14:17 "Yet he did not leave himself without witness, for he did good by >giving you rains from heaven and fruitful seasons, satisfying
your hearts with food and gladness."
someone eternally condemned & ever more cursed by GOD perseverated:
HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
Subject: a very very very simple definition of sin ...
Does andrew's "definition" agree with scripture? Let's see in 1 John:
John wrote this to christians. The greek grammer (sic) speaks of an ongoing >> status. He includes himself in that status.
1:8 If we say that we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, and the truth is
not in us.
1:9 If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just to forgive us our sins, >> and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness.
1:10 If we say that we have not sinned, we make him a liar, and his word is >> not in us.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 546 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 20:57:13 |
| Calls: | 10,390 |
| Calls today: | 1 |
| Files: | 14,061 |
| Messages: | 6,416,978 |