https://ethicsalarms.com/2024/08/21/brilliant-what-israel-is-trying-to-do-is-self-preservation-not-genocide-so-genocide-has-to-be-redefined-so-israel-can-be-accused-of-doing-it/
Brilliant: What Israel Is Trying To Do Is Self-Preservation, Not
Genocide. So Genocide Has To Be Redefined So Israel Can Be Accused Of
Doing It
August 21, 2024 / Jack Marshall
The case of genocide is a classic in the annals of deliberate
linguistic manipulation for unethical goals.
A detailed essay in the New York Times explains the machinations around
the word, which is similar to what we have seen recently in other cases,
like that of women, racism, lying, ad hominem (in a debate here
on Ethics Alarms), fascism,and insurrection, to name just a few of
many. The proliferation of this Orwellian process should set off not
just ethics alarms but evil alarms.
As the article correctly explains, international law addressing genocide
was aimed at extreme and unequivocal examples where a nation sets out to >exterminate an entire race or ethnic group for no other reason than that >groups existence. It is the ultimate hate crime, and thus was labeled a >crime against humanity. The Holocaust was the prime example: nothing >describes genocide more indisputably than a group of experts, military >officials and government leaders sitting around a table and deciding on
a Final Solution.
But as the article relates, mission creep has invaded the anti-genocide >brigade, for example with the United States being accused of genocide in
its treatment of Native American and because of the actions of the KKK
and others during the Jim Crow era, and now, with Israel being vilified
by the genocide label for being determined to eliminate a terrorist >organization pledged to commit genocide against Israelis.
Naturally, the United Nations is complicit in this process, and,
naturally, so is the I.C.J., the U.N.s top court. The U.S., among other >nations, supports the Geneva Convention but doesnt accept the authority
of the I.C.J. The article doesnt explicitly explain why, but the reason
is obvious: the court is subject to political motives and bias. It cant
be trusted.
Genocide has been slowly made a synonym for human rights violations,
and wars are by definition human rights violations. Thus the U.N. can
always use a politicized definition of genocide to declare any war,
even one triggered by a nations right and obligation to defend itself
and its citizens, as genocideparticularly if the nation waging the
war is Israel.
By the standards being weaponized by the protesters at the Democratic >National Convention, the U.S. ending World War II with two atom bombs
would qualify as genocide.
This is the unethicalbut effectiveprocess:
1. Identify a nation, group, individual, or leader that you want to
demonize.
2. Find a word universally regarded as describing conduct that is
heinous and unforgivable.
3. Redefine that word so that the policies, conduct or stated position
of that nation, group, individual, or leader can be described by it.
4. Repeat that word in association with the nation, group, individual,
or leaders policies, conduct or stated positions so that the word
itself is defined by those policies, conduct or stated positions, rather
than the other way around.
The average member of the publicyou know, moronswont know the difference.
What makes this tactic so effective, diabolical, and impossible to stop
is that there are many examples of pejorative words that should be used
and understood to apply beyond their most narrow definitions. Child
abuse. Indoctrination. Propaganda. Totalitarianism. Conflicts of
interest. The distinction, perhaps, is whether the expanded definition
is made in good faith, or it it is only aimed at a particular adversary
to achieve strategic political gains.
The article, The Bitter Fight Over the Meaning of Genocide is here
for you to read, freed from the paywall.
Michael Ejercito wrote:
https://ethicsalarms.com/2024/08/21/brilliant-what-israel-is-trying-to-do-is-self-preservation-not-genocide-so-genocide-has-to-be-redefined-so-israel-can-be-accused-of-doing-it/
Brilliant: What Israel Is Trying To Do Is Self-Preservation, Not
Genocide. So Genocide Has To Be Redefined So Israel Can Be Accused Of >>Doing It
August 21, 2024 / Jack Marshall
The case of genocide is a classic in the annals of deliberate
linguistic manipulation for unethical goals.
A detailed essay in the New York Times explains the machinations around
the word, which is similar to what we have seen recently in other cases, >>like that of women, racism, lying, ad hominem (in a debate here
on Ethics Alarms), fascism,and insurrection, to name just a few of >>many. The proliferation of this Orwellian process should set off not
just ethics alarms but evil alarms.
As the article correctly explains, international law addressing genocide >>was aimed at extreme and unequivocal examples where a nation sets out to >>exterminate an entire race or ethnic group for no other reason than that >>groups existence. It is the ultimate hate crime, and thus was labeled a >>crime against humanity. The Holocaust was the prime example: nothing >>describes genocide more indisputably than a group of experts, military >>officials and government leaders sitting around a table and deciding on
a Final Solution.
But as the article relates, mission creep has invaded the anti-genocide >>brigade, for example with the United States being accused of genocide in >>its treatment of Native American and because of the actions of the KKK
and others during the Jim Crow era, and now, with Israel being vilified
by the genocide label for being determined to eliminate a terrorist >>organization pledged to commit genocide against Israelis.
Naturally, the United Nations is complicit in this process, and,
naturally, so is the I.C.J., the U.N.s top court. The U.S., among other >>nations, supports the Geneva Convention but doesnt accept the authority
of the I.C.J. The article doesnt explicitly explain why, but the reason
is obvious: the court is subject to political motives and bias. It cant
be trusted.
Genocide has been slowly made a synonym for human rights violations, >>and wars are by definition human rights violations. Thus the U.N. can >>always use a politicized definition of genocide to declare any war,
even one triggered by a nations right and obligation to defend itself
and its citizens, as genocideparticularly if the nation waging the
war is Israel.
By the standards being weaponized by the protesters at the Democratic >>National Convention, the U.S. ending World War II with two atom bombs
would qualify as genocide.
This is the unethicalbut effectiveprocess:
1. Identify a nation, group, individual, or leader that you want to >>demonize.
2. Find a word universally regarded as describing conduct that is
heinous and unforgivable.
3. Redefine that word so that the policies, conduct or stated position
of that nation, group, individual, or leader can be described by it.
4. Repeat that word in association with the nation, group, individual,
or leaders policies, conduct or stated positions so that the word
itself is defined by those policies, conduct or stated positions, rather >>than the other way around.
The average member of the publicyou know, moronswont know the difference. >>
What makes this tactic so effective, diabolical, and impossible to stop
is that there are many examples of pejorative words that should be used
and understood to apply beyond their most narrow definitions. Child
abuse. Indoctrination. Propaganda. Totalitarianism. Conflicts of
interest. The distinction, perhaps, is whether the expanded definition
is made in good faith, or it it is only aimed at a particular adversary
to achieve strategic political gains.
The article, The Bitter Fight Over the Meaning of Genocide is here
for you to read, freed from the paywall.
Instead of genocide, it's Purim. Phonetically, Hamas remind us of
Haman, who was so hangry at Mordecai, the Jew, that his hatred/bigotry >extended to latter's entire ethnic group. Just as GOD utterly >defeating/destroying Haman wasn't murder, His destroying Hamas isn't >genocide. It is written that GOD says "Vengeance is Mine. I will
avenge."
Bottom line: Terrible things happen to the terribly hungry (aka >https:/bit.ly/h_angry like Hamas now following the example of Haman in
the time of Esther and the example of https://bit.ly/BiblicalEsau in
the time of Jacob/Israel in Genesis 25:32 when all of Palestine was
sold forever to Israel for just a single meal of bread and red lentil
soup).
So, instead of hangry, I am simply http://WonderfullyHungry.org for
food right now (Luke 6:21a) and hope you, Michael, and others reading
this, also have a healthy appetite for food right now too.
So how are you ?
https://ethicsalarms.com/2024/08/21/brilliant-what-israel-is-trying-to-do-is-self-preservation-not-genocide-so-genocide-has-to-be-redefined-so-israel-can-be-accused-of-doing-it/
Brilliant: What Israel Is Trying To Do Is Self-Preservation, Not
Genocide. So Genocide Has To Be Redefined So Israel Can Be Accused Of
Doing It
August 21, 2024 / Jack Marshall
The case of genocide is a classic in the annals of deliberate
linguistic manipulation for unethical goals.
A detailed essay in the New York Times explains the machinations around
the word, which is similar to what we have seen recently in other cases,
like that of women, racism, lying, ad hominem (in a debate here
on Ethics Alarms), fascism,and insurrection, to name just a few of
many. The proliferation of this Orwellian process should set off not
just ethics alarms but evil alarms.
As the article correctly explains, international law addressing genocide
was aimed at extreme and unequivocal examples where a nation sets out to >exterminate an entire race or ethnic group for no other reason than that >groups existence. It is the ultimate hate crime, and thus was labeled a >crime against humanity. The Holocaust was the prime example: nothing >describes genocide more indisputably than a group of experts, military >officials and government leaders sitting around a table and deciding on
a Final Solution.
But as the article relates, mission creep has invaded the anti-genocide >brigade, for example with the United States being accused of genocide in
its treatment of Native American and because of the actions of the KKK
and others during the Jim Crow era, and now, with Israel being vilified
by the genocide label for being determined to eliminate a terrorist >organization pledged to commit genocide against Israelis.
Naturally, the United Nations is complicit in this process, and,
naturally, so is the I.C.J., the U.N.s top court. The U.S., among other >nations, supports the Geneva Convention but doesnt accept the authority
of the I.C.J. The article doesnt explicitly explain why, but the reason
is obvious: the court is subject to political motives and bias. It cant
be trusted.
Genocide has been slowly made a synonym for human rights violations,
and wars are by definition human rights violations. Thus the U.N. can
always use a politicized definition of genocide to declare any war,
even one triggered by a nations right and obligation to defend itself
and its citizens, as genocideparticularly if the nation waging the
war is Israel.
By the standards being weaponized by the protesters at the Democratic >National Convention, the U.S. ending World War II with two atom bombs
would qualify as genocide.
This is the unethicalbut effectiveprocess:
1. Identify a nation, group, individual, or leader that you want to
demonize.
2. Find a word universally regarded as describing conduct that is
heinous and unforgivable.
3. Redefine that word so that the policies, conduct or stated position
of that nation, group, individual, or leader can be described by it.
4. Repeat that word in association with the nation, group, individual,
or leaders policies, conduct or stated positions so that the word
itself is defined by those policies, conduct or stated positions, rather
than the other way around.
The average member of the publicyou know, moronswont know the difference.
What makes this tactic so effective, diabolical, and impossible to stop
is that there are many examples of pejorative words that should be used
and understood to apply beyond their most narrow definitions. Child
abuse. Indoctrination. Propaganda. Totalitarianism. Conflicts of
interest. The distinction, perhaps, is whether the expanded definition
is made in good faith, or it it is only aimed at a particular adversary
to achieve strategic political gains.
The article, The Bitter Fight Over the Meaning of Genocide is here
for you to read, freed from the paywall.
HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
Subject: The LORD says "Blessed are you who hunger now ..."
Shame on andrew, look at his red face.
He is trying to pull a fast one. His scripture bit is found among these:
'14 Bible verses about Spiritual Hunger'
Psalms
81:10 I am the LORD thy God, which brought thee out of the land of Egypt: >open thy mouth wide, and I will fill it.
Proverbs
13:25 The righteous has enough to satisfy his appetite, But the stomach of >the wicked is in need.
Joel
2:26 And ye shall eat in plenty, and be satisfied, and praise the name of
the LORD your God, that hath dealt wondrously with you: and my
people shall never be ashamed.
Psalms
107 For he satisfies the thirsty and fills the hungry with good things.
Acts
14:17 "Yet he did not leave himself without witness, for he did good by >giving you rains from heaven and fruitful seasons, satisfying
your hearts with food and gladness."
someone eternally condemned & ever more cursed by GOD perseverated:
HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
Subject: a very very very simple definition of sin ...
Does andrew's "definition" agree with scripture? Let's see in 1 John:
John wrote this to christians. The greek grammer (sic) speaks of an ongoing >> status. He includes himself in that status.
1:8 If we say that we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, and the truth is
not in us.
1:9 If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just to forgive us our sins, >> and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness.
1:10 If we say that we have not sinned, we make him a liar, and his word is >> not in us.
Instead of genocide, it's Purim. Phonetically, Hamas remind us ofVery great point!
Haman, who was so hangry at Mordecai, the Jew, that his hatred/bigotry extended to latter's entire ethnic group. Just as GOD utterly defeating/destroying Haman wasn't murder, His destroying Hamas isn't genocide. It is written that GOD says "Vengeance is Mine. I will
avenge."
Bottom line: Terrible things happen to the terribly hungry (aka https:/bit.ly/h_angry like Hamas now following the example of Haman inI am wonderfully hungry!
the time of Esther and the example of https://bit.ly/BiblicalEsau in
the time of Jacob/Israel in Genesis 25:32 when all of Palestine was
sold forever to Israel for just a single meal of bread and red lentil
soup).
So, instead of hangry, I am simply http://WonderfullyHungry.org for
food right now (Luke 6:21a) and hope you, Michael, and others reading
this, also have a healthy appetite for food right now too.
So how are you ?
HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
Michael Ejercito wrote:
https://ethicsalarms.com/2024/08/21/brilliant-what-israel-is-trying-to-do-is-self-preservation-not-genocide-so-genocide-has-to-be-redefined-so-israel-can-be-accused-of-doing-it/
Brilliant: What Israel Is Trying To Do Is Self-Preservation, Not >>>Genocide. So Genocide Has To Be Redefined So Israel Can Be Accused Of >>>Doing It
August 21, 2024 / Jack Marshall
The case of genocide is a classic in the annals of deliberate >>>linguistic manipulation for unethical goals.
A detailed essay in the New York Times explains the machinations around >>>the word, which is similar to what we have seen recently in other cases, >>>like that of women, racism, lying, ad hominem (in a debate here >>>on Ethics Alarms), fascism,and insurrection, to name just a few of >>>many. The proliferation of this Orwellian process should set off not
just ethics alarms but evil alarms.
As the article correctly explains, international law addressing genocide >>>was aimed at extreme and unequivocal examples where a nation sets out to >>>exterminate an entire race or ethnic group for no other reason than that >>>groups existence. It is the ultimate hate crime, and thus was labeled a >>>crime against humanity. The Holocaust was the prime example: nothing >>>describes genocide more indisputably than a group of experts, military >>>officials and government leaders sitting around a table and deciding on
a Final Solution.
But as the article relates, mission creep has invaded the anti-genocide >>>brigade, for example with the United States being accused of genocide in >>>its treatment of Native American and because of the actions of the KKK >>>and others during the Jim Crow era, and now, with Israel being vilified >>>by the genocide label for being determined to eliminate a terrorist >>>organization pledged to commit genocide against Israelis.
Naturally, the United Nations is complicit in this process, and, >>>naturally, so is the I.C.J., the U.N.s top court. The U.S., among other >>>nations, supports the Geneva Convention but doesnt accept the authority >>>of the I.C.J. The article doesnt explicitly explain why, but the reason >>>is obvious: the court is subject to political motives and bias. It cant >>>be trusted.
Genocide has been slowly made a synonym for human rights violations, >>>and wars are by definition human rights violations. Thus the U.N. can >>>always use a politicized definition of genocide to declare any war, >>>even one triggered by a nations right and obligation to defend itself >>>and its citizens, as genocideparticularly if the nation waging the
war is Israel.
By the standards being weaponized by the protesters at the Democratic >>>National Convention, the U.S. ending World War II with two atom bombs >>>would qualify as genocide.
This is the unethicalbut effectiveprocess:
1. Identify a nation, group, individual, or leader that you want to >>>demonize.
2. Find a word universally regarded as describing conduct that is
heinous and unforgivable.
3. Redefine that word so that the policies, conduct or stated position
of that nation, group, individual, or leader can be described by it.
4. Repeat that word in association with the nation, group, individual,
or leaders policies, conduct or stated positions so that the word
itself is defined by those policies, conduct or stated positions, rather >>>than the other way around.
The average member of the publicyou know, moronswont know the difference. >>>
What makes this tactic so effective, diabolical, and impossible to stop >>>is that there are many examples of pejorative words that should be used >>>and understood to apply beyond their most narrow definitions. Child >>>abuse. Indoctrination. Propaganda. Totalitarianism. Conflicts of >>>interest. The distinction, perhaps, is whether the expanded definition
is made in good faith, or it it is only aimed at a particular adversary >>>to achieve strategic political gains.
The article, The Bitter Fight Over the Meaning of Genocide is here >>>for you to read, freed from the paywall.
Instead of genocide, it's Purim. Phonetically, Hamas remind us of
Haman, who was so hangry at Mordecai, the Jew, that his hatred/bigotry >>extended to latter's entire ethnic group. Just as GOD utterly >>defeating/destroying Haman wasn't murder, His destroying Hamas isn't >>genocide. It is written that GOD says "Vengeance is Mine. I will
avenge."
Very great point!
Bottom line: Terrible things happen to the terribly hungry (aka >>https:/bit.ly/h_angry like Hamas now following the example of Haman in
the time of Esther and the example of https://bit.ly/BiblicalEsau in
the time of Jacob/Israel in Genesis 25:32 when all of Palestine was
sold forever to Israel for just a single meal of bread and red lentil >>soup).
So, instead of hangry, I am simply http://WonderfullyHungry.org for
food right now (Luke 6:21a) and hope you, Michael, and others reading
this, also have a healthy appetite for food right now too.
So how are you ?
I am wonderfully hungry!
Yup. The only difference is that the Kiev pogrom was a MITZVAH.Mangina, there is nothing mitzvah about it.
HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
Subject: The LORD says "Blessed are you who hunger now ..."
Shame on andrew, look at his red face.
He is trying to pull a fast one. His scripture bit is found among these:
'14 Bible verses about Spiritual Hunger'
Psalms
81:10 I am the LORD thy God, which brought thee out of the land of Egypt: >open thy mouth wide, and I will fill it.
Proverbs
13:25 The righteous has enough to satisfy his appetite, But the stomach of >the wicked is in need.
Joel
2:26 And ye shall eat in plenty, and be satisfied, and praise the name of
the LORD your God, that hath dealt wondrously with you: and my
people shall never be ashamed.
Psalms
107 For he satisfies the thirsty and fills the hungry with good things.
Acts
14:17 "Yet he did not leave himself without witness, for he did good by >giving you rains from heaven and fruitful seasons, satisfying
your hearts with food and gladness."
someone eternally condemned & ever more cursed by GOD perseverated:
HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
Subject: a very very very simple definition of sin ...
Does andrew's "definition" agree with scripture? Let's see in 1 John:
John wrote this to christians. The greek grammer (sic) speaks of an ongoing >> status. He includes himself in that status.
1:8 If we say that we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, and the truth is
not in us.
1:9 If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just to forgive us our sins, >> and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness.
1:10 If we say that we have not sinned, we make him a liar, and his word is >> not in us.
ReplyPermalinkOn Thu, 22 Aug 2024 08:20:08 -0700, NOT Michael EjercitoNithing, it was an atrocity!
Mangina, there is nothing mitzvah about it.Needledick, it was like TOTALLY mitzvah.
The Peeler dominated you, humiliated you, and tormented you!I will never forget how the Peeler dominated you and humiliated youI will never forget how I mocked, dominated and humiliated the
on a daily basis!
Foreskin PEELER to the point that he couldn't take it any more and
LEFT with his tail between his legs. JUST like all the others!.
That would be better than being a Nazi nithing.You are a Nazi.You are a gook.
You are a nithing- homo sapiens by birth, subhuman BY CHOICE. TheAs a Nazi, you are, above all elseAs a craven gook who zsuckles jew ani, you are, below all else
HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
Subject: The LORD says "Blessed are you who hunger now ..."
Shame on andrew, look at his red face.
He is trying to pull a fast one. His scripture bit is found among these:
'14 Bible verses about Spiritual Hunger'
Psalms
81:10 I am the LORD thy God, which brought thee out of the land of Egypt: >open thy mouth wide, and I will fill it.
Proverbs
13:25 The righteous has enough to satisfy his appetite, But the stomach of >the wicked is in need.
Joel
2:26 And ye shall eat in plenty, and be satisfied, and praise the name of
the LORD your God, that hath dealt wondrously with you: and my
people shall never be ashamed.
Psalms
107 For he satisfies the thirsty and fills the hungry with good things.
Acts
14:17 "Yet he did not leave himself without witness, for he did good by >giving you rains from heaven and fruitful seasons, satisfying
your hearts with food and gladness."
someone eternally condemned & ever more cursed by GOD perseverated:
HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
Subject: a very very very simple definition of sin ...
Does andrew's "definition" agree with scripture? Let's see in 1 John:
John wrote this to christians. The greek grammer (sic) speaks of an ongoing >> status. He includes himself in that status.
1:8 If we say that we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, and the truth is
not in us.
1:9 If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just to forgive us our sins, >> and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness.
1:10 If we say that we have not sinned, we make him a liar, and his word is >> not in us.
ReplyPermalinkOn Thu, 22 Aug 2024 19:44:44 -0700, NOT Michael Ejercitohe kept dominating you and humiliating you.
So where IS he, gook? Where are the OTHER jewlovers and jews?
I mocked, ridiculed, dominated, humiliated and tormented the Foreskin
PEELER for YEARS! In the end, the silly little grik faggot couldn't
TAKE it any more and LEFT.
If YOU had an ounce of self-respect, YOU would leave TOO.Why would I leave?
HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
Subject: The LORD says "Blessed are you who hunger now ..."
Shame on andrew, look at his red face.
He is trying to pull a fast one. His scripture bit is found among these:
'14 Bible verses about Spiritual Hunger'
Psalms
81:10 I am the LORD thy God, which brought thee out of the land of Egypt: >open thy mouth wide, and I will fill it.
Proverbs
13:25 The righteous has enough to satisfy his appetite, But the stomach of >the wicked is in need.
Joel
2:26 And ye shall eat in plenty, and be satisfied, and praise the name of
the LORD your God, that hath dealt wondrously with you: and my
people shall never be ashamed.
Psalms
107 For he satisfies the thirsty and fills the hungry with good things.
Acts
14:17 "Yet he did not leave himself without witness, for he did good by >giving you rains from heaven and fruitful seasons, satisfying
your hearts with food and gladness."
someone eternally condemned & ever more cursed by GOD perseverated:
HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
Subject: a very very very simple definition of sin ...
Does andrew's "definition" agree with scripture? Let's see in 1 John:
John wrote this to christians. The greek grammer (sic) speaks of an ongoing >> status. He includes himself in that status.
1:8 If we say that we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, and the truth is
not in us.
1:9 If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just to forgive us our sins, >> and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness.
1:10 If we say that we have not sinned, we make him a liar, and his word is >> not in us.
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 546 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 19:09:36 |
Calls: | 10,389 |
Files: | 14,061 |
Messages: | 6,416,960 |