XPost: alt.bible.prophecy, soc.culture.usa, soc.culture.israel
XPost: uk.legal

https://ethicsalarms.com/2025/03/11/the-ethics-of-deporting-mahmoud-khalil-for-pro-terrorist-advocacy/

The Ethics of Deporting Mahmoud Khalil For Pro-Terrorist Advocacy
March 11, 2025 / Jack Marshall


ICE arrested Palestinian activist and former Columbia student Mahmoud
Khalil with the intent of deporting him in accordance with the announced
Trump policy of deporting non-citizens who engage in pro-“terrorist”
speech related to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Predictably, the
Axis is all-in supporting Khalil, who sure appears to be a bad human
hill to die on. Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez condemned ICE’s detainment of Mahmoud Khalil, calling it a “tyrannical” move, “Violating rule of law, actually,” she wrote. That AOC defends him alone makes me inclined to want to get rid of the guy, but that would be irrational.
Judge Jesse Furman of the Southern District of New York issued an order
today halting Khalil’s processing and scheduled a hearing on the case
for later this week. Ah yes, the Southern District of New York!

In a confusing essay at The Volokh Conspiracy, Ilya Somin writes that
deporting non-citizens for the content of their speech is a Firts
Amendment violation and “a slippery slope,” then, in the fifth
paragraph, acknowledges that 8 U.S.C. § 1182(a)(3), bars “Any alien who
… endorses or espouses terrorist activity or persuades others to endorse
or espouse terrorist activity or support a terrorist organization.” I’d
say endorsing and supporting Hamas qualifies under that law, wouldn’t
you? So Somin says, “Such laws, too, should be ruled unconstitutional.”
But until and unless it is, the Trump administration has the law on its
side.

The question remains, is such a restriction on the free speech of
non-citizens ethical? Somin:

“The First Amendment’s protection for freedom of speech, like most constitutional rights, is not limited to US citizens. The text of the
First Amendment is worded as a general limitation on government power,
not a form of special protection for a particular group of people, such
as US citizens or permanent residents. The Supreme Court held as much in
a 1945 case, where they ruled that “Freedom of speech and of press is accorded aliens residing in this country.”


I find this absolutist approach fairly persuasive, because free speech
is safest when the exception to the First Amendment are rare. And yet, I
can also see the utilitarian value of a principle that says that while
one is a guest in this country and not yet a citizen, one should behave.
If you want full protection of the First Amendment, become a citizen.
Somin concedes that even if non-citizens have a right to free speech,
they don’t have a constitutional right to stay in the US so, arguably, deporting them for disruptive speech doesn’t violate the Constitution.
But, he says, depriving people of a right as punishment for their speech violates the First Amendment.

Except that residing in the U.S. when one is not a citizen isn’t a
right, but a privilege.

Somin also loses me—forever!—with this foolishness: “I would argue that freedom of movement – including across international boundaries – is
also a human right, one that should not be restricted based on
arbitrary circumstances of parentage and place of birth.” That sounds
like an open boarders argument to me, and that is signature significance
for a scholar who is estranged from reality. Utopian positions that are impossible in the real world are unethical: they just waste time and
confuse people.

Whether deporting non-citizen pro-terrorism advocates like Mahmoud
Khalil is constitutional, legal or ethical is a close call all around. Presumably the U.S. Supreme Court will end up deciding.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: alt.bible.prophecy, soc.culture.usa, soc.culture.israel
XPost: uk.legal, alt.christnet.christianlife

Michael Ejercito wrote:

https://ethicsalarms.com/2025/03/11/the-ethics-of-deporting-mahmoud-khalil-for-pro-terrorist-advocacy/

The Ethics of Deporting Mahmoud Khalil For Pro-Terrorist Advocacy
March 11, 2025 / Jack Marshall

ICE arrested Palestinian activist and former Columbia student Mahmoud
Khalil with the intent of deporting him in accordance with the announced >Trump policy of deporting non-citizens who engage in pro-�terrorist�
speech related to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Predictably, the
Axis is all-in supporting Khalil, who sure appears to be a bad human
hill to die on. Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez condemned ICE�s >detainment of Mahmoud Khalil, calling it a �tyrannical� move, �Violating
rule of law, actually,� she wrote. That AOC defends him alone makes me >inclined to want to get rid of the guy, but that would be irrational.
Judge Jesse Furman of the Southern District of New York issued an order
today halting Khalil�s processing and scheduled a hearing on the case
for later this week. Ah yes, the Southern District of New York!

In a confusing essay at The Volokh Conspiracy, Ilya Somin writes that >deporting non-citizens for the content of their speech is a Firts
Amendment violation and �a slippery slope,� then, in the fifth
paragraph, acknowledges that 8 U.S.C. � 1182(a)(3), bars �Any alien who
� endorses or espouses terrorist activity or persuades others to endorse
or espouse terrorist activity or support a terrorist organization.� I�d
say endorsing and supporting Hamas qualifies under that law, wouldn�t
you? So Somin says, �Such laws, too, should be ruled unconstitutional.�
But until and unless it is, the Trump administration has the law on its
side.

The question remains, is such a restriction on the free speech of >non-citizens ethical? Somin:

�The First Amendment�s protection for freedom of speech, like most >constitutional rights, is not limited to US citizens. The text of the
First Amendment is worded as a general limitation on government power,
not a form of special protection for a particular group of people, such
as US citizens or permanent residents. The Supreme Court held as much in
a 1945 case, where they ruled that �Freedom of speech and of press is >accorded aliens residing in this country.�

I find this absolutist approach fairly persuasive, because free speech
is safest when the exception to the First Amendment are rare. And yet, I
can also see the utilitarian value of a principle that says that while
one is a guest in this country and not yet a citizen, one should behave.
If you want full protection of the First Amendment, become a citizen.
Somin concedes that even if non-citizens have a right to free speech,
they don�t have a constitutional right to stay in the US so, arguably, >deporting them for disruptive speech doesn�t violate the Constitution.
But, he says, depriving people of a right as punishment for their speech >violates the First Amendment.

Except that residing in the U.S. when one is not a citizen isn�t a
right, but a privilege.

Somin also loses me�forever!�with this foolishness: �I would argue that >freedom of movement � including across international boundaries � is
also a human right, one that should not be restricted based on
arbitrary circumstances of parentage and place of birth.� That sounds
like an open boarders argument to me, and that is signature significance
for a scholar who is estranged from reality. Utopian positions that are >impossible in the real world are unethical: they just waste time and
confuse people.

Whether deporting non-citizen pro-terrorism advocates like Mahmoud
Khalil is constitutional, legal or ethical is a close call all around. >Presumably the U.S. Supreme Court will end up deciding.

The absolutely only godly way to permanently defeat all enemies of
Israel, including either Hamas and/or Hezbollah now but also all
others in the future, without sacrificing free speech is by lifting up
Israel's http://WonderfullyHungry.org (Luke 24:42-3) Messiah.

Indeed, I am http://WonderfullyHungry.org (Philippians 4:12) for food
right now (Luke 6:21a) and hope you, Michael, and others reading this,
also have a healthy appetite for food right now too.

So how are you ?

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: alt.bible.prophecy, soc.culture.usa, soc.culture.israel
XPost: uk.legal, alt.christnet.christianlife

HeartDoc Andrew wrote:

Michael Ejercito wrote:

https://ethicsalarms.com/2025/03/11/the-ethics-of-deporting-mahmoud-khalil-for-pro-terrorist-advocacy/

The Ethics of Deporting Mahmoud Khalil For Pro-Terrorist Advocacy
March 11, 2025 / Jack Marshall


ICE arrested Palestinian activist and former Columbia student Mahmoud
Khalil with the intent of deporting him in accordance with the announced
Trump policy of deporting non-citizens who engage in pro-“terrorist”
speech related to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Predictably, the
Axis is all-in supporting Khalil, who sure appears to be a bad human
hill to die on. Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez condemned ICE’s
detainment of Mahmoud Khalil, calling it a “tyrannical” move, “Violating
rule of law, actually,” she wrote. That AOC defends him alone makes me
inclined to want to get rid of the guy, but that would be irrational.
Judge Jesse Furman of the Southern District of New York issued an order
today halting Khalil’s processing and scheduled a hearing on the case
for later this week. Ah yes, the Southern District of New York!

In a confusing essay at The Volokh Conspiracy, Ilya Somin writes that
deporting non-citizens for the content of their speech is a Firts
Amendment violation and “a slippery slope,” then, in the fifth
paragraph, acknowledges that 8 U.S.C. § 1182(a)(3), bars “Any alien who >> … endorses or espouses terrorist activity or persuades others to endorse >> or espouse terrorist activity or support a terrorist organization.” I’d >> say endorsing and supporting Hamas qualifies under that law, wouldn’t
you? So Somin says, “Such laws, too, should be ruled unconstitutional.” >> But until and unless it is, the Trump administration has the law on its
side.

The question remains, is such a restriction on the free speech of
non-citizens ethical? Somin:

“The First Amendment’s protection for freedom of speech, like most
constitutional rights, is not limited to US citizens. The text of the
First Amendment is worded as a general limitation on government power,
not a form of special protection for a particular group of people, such
as US citizens or permanent residents. The Supreme Court held as much in
a 1945 case, where they ruled that “Freedom of speech and of press is
accorded aliens residing in this country.”


I find this absolutist approach fairly persuasive, because free speech
is safest when the exception to the First Amendment are rare. And yet, I
can also see the utilitarian value of a principle that says that while
one is a guest in this country and not yet a citizen, one should behave.
If you want full protection of the First Amendment, become a citizen.
Somin concedes that even if non-citizens have a right to free speech,
they don’t have a constitutional right to stay in the US so, arguably,
deporting them for disruptive speech doesn’t violate the Constitution.
But, he says, depriving people of a right as punishment for their speech
violates the First Amendment.

Except that residing in the U.S. when one is not a citizen isn’t a
right, but a privilege.

Somin also loses me—forever!—with this foolishness: “I would argue that
freedom of movement – including across international boundaries – is
also a human right, one that should not be restricted based on
arbitrary circumstances of parentage and place of birth.” That sounds
like an open boarders argument to me, and that is signature significance
for a scholar who is estranged from reality. Utopian positions that are
impossible in the real world are unethical: they just waste time and
confuse people.

Whether deporting non-citizen pro-terrorism advocates like Mahmoud
Khalil is constitutional, legal or ethical is a close call all around.
Presumably the U.S. Supreme Court will end up deciding.

The absolutely only godly way to permanently defeat all enemies of
Israel, including either Hamas and/or Hezbollah now but also all
others in the future, without sacrificing free speech is by lifting up Israel's http://WonderfullyHungry.org (Luke 24:42-3) Messiah.

Indeed, I am http://WonderfullyHungry.org (Philippians 4:12) for food
right now (Luke 6:21a) and hope you, Michael, and others reading this,
also have a healthy appetite for food right now too.

So how are you ?

I am wonderfully hungry!


Michael

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: alt.bible.prophecy, soc.culture.usa, soc.culture.israel
XPost: uk.legal, alt.christnet.christianlife

Michael Ejercito wrote:

HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:

Michael Ejercito wrote:

https://ethicsalarms.com/2025/03/11/the-ethics-of-deporting-mahmoud-khalil-for-pro-terrorist-advocacy/

The Ethics of Deporting Mahmoud Khalil For Pro-Terrorist Advocacy
March 11, 2025 / Jack Marshall


ICE arrested Palestinian activist and former Columbia student Mahmoud
Khalil with the intent of deporting him in accordance with the announced >>> Trump policy of deporting non-citizens who engage in pro-�terrorist�
speech related to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Predictably, the
Axis is all-in supporting Khalil, who sure appears to be a bad human
hill to die on. Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez condemned ICE�s
detainment of Mahmoud Khalil, calling it a �tyrannical� move, �Violating >>> rule of law, actually,� she wrote. That AOC defends him alone makes me
inclined to want to get rid of the guy, but that would be irrational.
Judge Jesse Furman of the Southern District of New York issued an order
today halting Khalil�s processing and scheduled a hearing on the case
for later this week. Ah yes, the Southern District of New York!

In a confusing essay at The Volokh Conspiracy, Ilya Somin writes that
deporting non-citizens for the content of their speech is a Firts
Amendment violation and �a slippery slope,� then, in the fifth
paragraph, acknowledges that 8 U.S.C. � 1182(a)(3), bars �Any alien who
� endorses or espouses terrorist activity or persuades others to endorse >>> or espouse terrorist activity or support a terrorist organization.� I�d
say endorsing and supporting Hamas qualifies under that law, wouldn�t
you? So Somin says, �Such laws, too, should be ruled unconstitutional.�
But until and unless it is, the Trump administration has the law on its
side.

The question remains, is such a restriction on the free speech of
non-citizens ethical? Somin:

�The First Amendment�s protection for freedom of speech, like most
constitutional rights, is not limited to US citizens. The text of the
First Amendment is worded as a general limitation on government power,
not a form of special protection for a particular group of people, such
as US citizens or permanent residents. The Supreme Court held as much in >>> a 1945 case, where they ruled that �Freedom of speech and of press is
accorded aliens residing in this country.�


I find this absolutist approach fairly persuasive, because free speech
is safest when the exception to the First Amendment are rare. And yet, I >>> can also see the utilitarian value of a principle that says that while
one is a guest in this country and not yet a citizen, one should behave. >>> If you want full protection of the First Amendment, become a citizen.
Somin concedes that even if non-citizens have a right to free speech,
they don�t have a constitutional right to stay in the US so, arguably,
deporting them for disruptive speech doesn�t violate the Constitution.
But, he says, depriving people of a right as punishment for their speech >>> violates the First Amendment.

Except that residing in the U.S. when one is not a citizen isn�t a
right, but a privilege.

Somin also loses me�forever!�with this foolishness: �I would argue that
freedom of movement � including across international boundaries � is
also a human right, one that should not be restricted based on
arbitrary circumstances of parentage and place of birth.� That sounds
like an open boarders argument to me, and that is signature significance >>> for a scholar who is estranged from reality. Utopian positions that are
impossible in the real world are unethical: they just waste time and
confuse people.

Whether deporting non-citizen pro-terrorism advocates like Mahmoud
Khalil is constitutional, legal or ethical is a close call all around.
Presumably the U.S. Supreme Court will end up deciding.

The absolutely only godly way to permanently defeat all enemies of
Israel, including either Hamas and/or Hezbollah now but also all
others in the future, without sacrificing free speech is by lifting up
Israel's http://WonderfullyHungry.org (Luke 24:42-3) Messiah.

Indeed, I am http://WonderfullyHungry.org (Philippians 4:12) for food
right now (Luke 6:21a) and hope you, Michael, and others reading this,
also have a healthy appetite for food right now too.

So how are you ?

I am wonderfully hungry!

While wonderfully hungry in the Holy Spirit, Who causes (Deuteronomy
8:3) us to hunger, I note that you, Michael, are rapture ready (Luke
17:37 means no COVID just as eagles circling over their food have no
COVID) and pray (2 Chronicles 7:14) that our Everlasting (Isaiah 9:6)
Father in Heaven continues to give us "much more" (Luke 11:13) Holy
Spirit (Galatians 5:22-23) so that we'd have much more of His Help to
always say/write that we're "wonderfully hungry" in **all** ways
including especially caring to "convince it forward" (John 15:12) with
all glory (Psalm112:1) to GOD (aka HaShem, Elohim, Abba, DEO), in
the name (John 16:23) of LORD Jesus Christ of Nazareth. Amen.

Laus DEO !

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: alt.bible.prophecy, soc.culture.usa, soc.culture.israel
XPost: uk.legal, alt.christnet.christianlife

(Khalil) 03/11/25 Again not a LoosePeeledWhiteChristianBigot...

https://groups.google.com/g/sci.med.cardiology/c/Ai33hw5PINI/m/wytVpY68MwAJ

Instead be "woke" to the sin of racial prejudice:

https://tinyurl.com/JesusIsWoke (i.e. not a Nazi bigot) *and* risen!!!

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: alt.bible.prophecy, soc.culture.usa, soc.culture.israel
XPost: uk.legal

Andrew 'Andrzej' Baron (aka SHEIN)about 15 hours ago

ReplyPermalinkOn Tue, 11 Mar 2025 05:06:04 -0700, NOT Michael Ejercito
Post by Michael Ejercito

https://ethicsalarms.com/2025/03/11/the-ethics-of-deporting-mahmoud-khalil-for-pro-terrorist-advocacy/
The Ethics of Deporting Mahmoud Khalil For Pro-Terrorist Advocacy
March 11, 2025 / Jack Marshall

Never mind that, what about the ethics of deporting YOU for your
pro-semitic (aka ainlungual) advocacy?

Mangina, I am an American citizen!

You are a Nazi.

As a Nazi, you are, above all else, a craven coward.

You are afraid to compete with others as equals because you know you
can not measure up.

You are afraid of your own inadequacy, so you want to murder your
betters.

You are afraid of the truth, so you want to murder those who would
tell it.

You are afraid of history, so you want to murder the past, to wipe
out the knowledge of the degeneracy, cowardice and failure of National Socialism.

Finally, you are afraid of the power of educated, informed adults.
Freedom of choice terrifies you… which is why you choose minor children
as sexual partners. You can not interact with competent adults in a consensually sexual way. You need to be able to impose yourself on a
helpless victim, be it a prepubescent boy, or a patient in a mental
hospital.

That is what you are, a Nazi, and there is nothing polite or honest
about it.


Michael

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: alt.bible.prophecy, soc.culture.usa, soc.culture.israel
XPost: uk.legal, alt.christnet.christianlife

HeartDoc Andrew wrote:

Michael Ejercito wrote:

HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:

Michael Ejercito wrote:

https://ethicsalarms.com/2025/03/11/the-ethics-of-deporting-mahmoud-khalil-for-pro-terrorist-advocacy/

The Ethics of Deporting Mahmoud Khalil For Pro-Terrorist Advocacy
March 11, 2025 / Jack Marshall


ICE arrested Palestinian activist and former Columbia student Mahmoud
Khalil with the intent of deporting him in accordance with the announced >>>> Trump policy of deporting non-citizens who engage in pro-“terrorist” >>>> speech related to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Predictably, the
Axis is all-in supporting Khalil, who sure appears to be a bad human
hill to die on. Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez condemned ICE’s >>>> detainment of Mahmoud Khalil, calling it a “tyrannical” move, “Violating
rule of law, actually,” she wrote. That AOC defends him alone makes me >>>> inclined to want to get rid of the guy, but that would be irrational.
Judge Jesse Furman of the Southern District of New York issued an order >>>> today halting Khalil’s processing and scheduled a hearing on the case >>>> for later this week. Ah yes, the Southern District of New York!

In a confusing essay at The Volokh Conspiracy, Ilya Somin writes that
deporting non-citizens for the content of their speech is a Firts
Amendment violation and “a slippery slope,” then, in the fifth
paragraph, acknowledges that 8 U.S.C. § 1182(a)(3), bars “Any alien who >>>> … endorses or espouses terrorist activity or persuades others to endorse >>>> or espouse terrorist activity or support a terrorist organization.” I’d
say endorsing and supporting Hamas qualifies under that law, wouldn’t >>>> you? So Somin says, “Such laws, too, should be ruled unconstitutional.”
But until and unless it is, the Trump administration has the law on its >>>> side.

The question remains, is such a restriction on the free speech of
non-citizens ethical? Somin:

“The First Amendment’s protection for freedom of speech, like most >>>> constitutional rights, is not limited to US citizens. The text of the
First Amendment is worded as a general limitation on government power, >>>> not a form of special protection for a particular group of people, such >>>> as US citizens or permanent residents. The Supreme Court held as much in >>>> a 1945 case, where they ruled that “Freedom of speech and of press is >>>> accorded aliens residing in this country.”


I find this absolutist approach fairly persuasive, because free speech >>>> is safest when the exception to the First Amendment are rare. And yet, I >>>> can also see the utilitarian value of a principle that says that while >>>> one is a guest in this country and not yet a citizen, one should behave. >>>> If you want full protection of the First Amendment, become a citizen.
Somin concedes that even if non-citizens have a right to free speech,
they don’t have a constitutional right to stay in the US so, arguably, >>>> deporting them for disruptive speech doesn’t violate the Constitution. >>>> But, he says, depriving people of a right as punishment for their speech >>>> violates the First Amendment.

Except that residing in the U.S. when one is not a citizen isn’t a
right, but a privilege.

Somin also loses me—forever!—with this foolishness: “I would argue that
freedom of movement – including across international boundaries – is >>>> also a human right, one that should not be restricted based on
arbitrary circumstances of parentage and place of birth.” That sounds >>>> like an open boarders argument to me, and that is signature significance >>>> for a scholar who is estranged from reality. Utopian positions that are >>>> impossible in the real world are unethical: they just waste time and
confuse people.

Whether deporting non-citizen pro-terrorism advocates like Mahmoud
Khalil is constitutional, legal or ethical is a close call all around. >>>> Presumably the U.S. Supreme Court will end up deciding.

The absolutely only godly way to permanently defeat all enemies of
Israel, including either Hamas and/or Hezbollah now but also all
others in the future, without sacrificing free speech is by lifting up
Israel's http://WonderfullyHungry.org (Luke 24:42-3) Messiah.

Indeed, I am http://WonderfullyHungry.org (Philippians 4:12) for food
right now (Luke 6:21a) and hope you, Michael, and others reading this,
also have a healthy appetite for food right now too.

So how are you ?

I am wonderfully hungry!

While wonderfully hungry in the Holy Spirit, Who causes (Deuteronomy
8:3) us to hunger, I note that you, Michael, are rapture ready (Luke
17:37 means no COVID just as eagles circling over their food have no
COVID) and pray (2 Chronicles 7:14) that our Everlasting (Isaiah 9:6)
Father in Heaven continues to give us "much more" (Luke 11:13) Holy
Spirit (Galatians 5:22-23) so that we'd have much more of His Help to
always say/write that we're "wonderfully hungry" in **all** ways
including especially caring to "convince it forward" (John 15:12) with
all glory (Psalm112:1) to GOD (aka HaShem, Elohim, Abba, DEO), in
the name (John 16:23) of LORD Jesus Christ of Nazareth. Amen.

Laus DEO !

Thank you for noting that I have no COVID.


Michael

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: alt.bible.prophecy, soc.culture.usa, soc.culture.israel
XPost: uk.legal, alt.christnet.christianlife

<Khalil> 03/12/25 Andrzej/KK again vainjangling (1 Tim 1:6) ...

https://groups.google.com/g/sci.med.cardiology/c/4tIJn_I167w/m/bKWQRUarAgAJ

Link to post explicating vainjangling by the eternally condemned: https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.med.cardiology/O23NguTslhI/-xLGqnNjAAAJ

"Like a moth to flame, the eternally condemned tragically return to be
ever more cursed by GOD."

Behold in wide-eyed wonder and amazement at the continued fulfillment
of this prophecy as clearly demonstrated within the following USENET
threads:

(1) Link to thread titled "LORD Jesus Christ of Nazareth is our #1
Example of being wonderfully hungry;"

https://groups.google.com/g/sci.med.cardiology/c/_iVmOb7q3_Q/m/E8L7TNNtAgAJ

(2) Link to thread titled "Being wonderfully hungry;"

https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/sci.med.cardiology/uCPb3ldOv5M

(3) Link to thread titled "A very very very simple definition of sin;"

https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/alt.bible.prophecy/xunFWhan_AM

(4) Link to thread titled "The LORD says 'Blessed are you who hunger
now;'"

https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/alt.bible.prophecy/e4sW8dr44rM

(5) Link to thread titled "Being wonderfully hungry like LORD Jesus;"

https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.bible.prophecy/xPY1Uzl-ZNk/QeKLDNCpCwAJ

... for the continued benefit (Romans 8:28) of those of us who are http://WonderfullyHungry.org like GOD ( http://bit.ly/Lk2442 ) with
all glory ( http://bit.ly/Psalm112_1 ) to the LORD.

Source: https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.med.cardiology/O23NguTslhI/pIZcsOCJBwAJ

Laus DEO !

While wonderfully hungry ( http://bit.ly/Philippians4_12 ) in the Holy
Spirit, Who causes (Deuteronomy 8:3) me to hunger right now (Luke
6:21a), I pray (2 Chronicles 7:14) that GOD continues to curse
(Jeremiah 17:5) you, who are eternally condemned (Mark 3:29), more
than ever in the name of Jesus Christ of Nazareth. Amen.

Laus DEO ! ! !

Bottom line: https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.med.cardiology/O23NguTslhI/h5lE-mr0DAAJ

<begin trichotomy>

(1) Born-again (John 3:3 & 5) humans - Folks who have GOD's Help (i.e.
Holy Spirit) to stop (John 5:14) sinning by being
http://WonderfullyHungry.org (Philippians 4:12) **but** are still
able to choose via their own "free will" to be instead http://bit.ly/terribly_hungry (Genesis 25:32) trapped in the
entangling (Hebrews 12:1) deadly (i.e. killed immortals Adam&Eve) sin
of gluttony (Proverbs 23:2).

(2) Eternally condemned (Mark 3:29) humans - Folks who will never have
GOD's Help (i.e. Holy Spirit) to stop being
http://bit.ly/terribly_hungry (2 Kings 6:29) as evident by their
constant vainjangling (1 Timothy 1:6) about everything except how to
stop (John 5:14) sinning.

(3) Perishing humans - The remaining folks who may possibly (Matthew
19:26) become born-again (John 3:3 & 5) as new (2 Corinthians 5:17)
creatures in Christ.

<end trichotomy>

Suggested further reading:
http://T3WiJ.com

+++

someone eternally condemned & ever more cursed by GOD wrote:

HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:

Subject: The LORD says "Blessed are you who hunger now ..."

Source: https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.bible.prophecy/e4sW8dr44rM/NSkTJxvFBAAJ

Shame on andrew, look at his red face.

LIE.

The color of my face in **not** visible here on USENET nor is the
color of my face red for those who can see me.

He is trying to pull a fast one. His scripture bit is found among these:

'14 Bible verses about Spiritual Hunger'

Such are the lies coming from the lying pens of the http://bit.ly/terribly_hungry (Genesis 25:32) commentators.

That which is "spiritual" is independent of time so that there
would've been no reference to "now."

Therefore, the LORD is referring to physical hunger here instead of
the spiritual "hunger and thirst for righteousness" elsewhere in
Scripture.

Indeed, physical hunger can **not** coexist with physical thirst
because the latter results in the loss of saliva needed for physical
hunger.

It is when we hunger for food "now" (Luke 6:21a) that we are able to
eat food "now."

No such time constraints exist for "spiritual hunger."

Moreover, the perspective of Luke 6:21a through the eyes of a
physician (i.e. Dr. Luke) would be logically expected to be physical
instead of spiritual.

All glory ( http://bit.ly/Psalm112_1 ) to GOD for His compelling you
to unwittingly demonstrate your ever worsening cognitive condition
which is tragically a consequence of His cursing (Jeremiah 17:5) you
more than ever.

Laus DEO !

+++

someone eternally condemned & ever more cursed by GOD perseverated:
(in a vain attempt to refute posts about being wonderfully hungry)

Psalms
81:10 I am the LORD thy God, which brought thee out of the land of Egypt: >open thy mouth wide, and I will fill it.

Indeed, receiving a mouthful (Psalm 81:10) of manna from GOD will only
make His http://WDJW.great-site.net/Redeemed want even more, so that
we're even http://bit.ly/wonderfully_hungrier with all glory ( http://bit.ly/Psalm112_1 ) to GOD.

Laus DEO !

Proverbs
13:25 The righteous has enough to satisfy his appetite, But the stomach of >the wicked is in need.

Indeed, the righteous know to be satisfied (Luke 6:21a) with an omer
(Exodus 16:16) of manna, while the wicked need (Proverbs 13:25) this
knowledge as evident by their eating until they are full (i.e.
satiated).

Joel
2:26 And ye shall eat in plenty, and be satisfied, and praise the name of
the LORD your God, that hath dealt wondrously with you: and my
people shall never be ashamed.

Indeed, an omer (32 ounces per Revelation 6:6) of manna is plenty
(Joel 2:26) with all glory ( http://bit.ly/Psalm112_1 ) to GOD and to
the shame of you, who are eternally (Mark 3:29) condemned.

Laus DEO ! !

Psalms
107 For he satisfies the thirsty and fills the hungry with good things.

Indeed, being filled (Psalm 107:9) with an omer (Exodus 16:16) of
manna is a Wonderful (Isaiah 9:6) thing while being satiated (i.e.
full) is evil.

Acts
14:17 "Yet he did not leave himself without witness, for he did good by >giving you rains from heaven and fruitful seasons, satisfying
your hearts with food and gladness."

In the interim, you, who are eternally (Mark 3:29) condemned, will
never be satisfied (Acts 14:17) because you are ever more cursed
(Jeremiah 17:5) by GOD.

Source: https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.med.cardiology/uCPb3ldOv5M/KgM8NFKuAQAJ

+++

someone eternally condemned & ever more cursed by GOD perseverated:

HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:

Subject: a very very very simple definition of sin ...

Source: https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.med.cardiology/mXmFD9kIocc/y8GNXircBQAJ

Does andrew's "definition" agree with scripture? Let's see in 1 John:

Actually, sin is **not** defined in 1 John 1:8-10

John wrote this to christians. The greek grammer (sic) speaks of an ongoing >> status. He includes himself in that status.

John was a Jew instead of a Greek so there is really no reason to
think that Greek grammar is relevant here.

1:8 If we say that we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, and the truth is
not in us.

1:9 If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just to forgive us our sins, >> and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness.

1:10 If we say that we have not sinned, we make him a liar, and his word is >> not in us.

John also wrote earlier at John 5:14 that LORD Jesus commands:

"Now stop sinning or something worse may happen to you." (John 5:14)

And, indeed, your being eternally condemned (Mark 3:29) & ever more
cursed (Jeremiah 17:5) by GOD, as evident by your ever worsening
cognitive deficits, is really worse.

Now again, here's how to really stop sinning as LORD Jesus commands
(John 5:14):

https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.bible.prophecy/2-Qpn-o81J4/ldGubKEZAgAJ

While wonderfully hungry ( http://bit.ly/Philippians4_12 ) in the Holy
Spirit, Who causes (Deuteronomy 8:3) me to hunger right now (Luke
6:21a), I again pray (2 Chronicles 7:14) that GOD continues to curse
(Jeremiah 17:5) you, who are eternally condemned (Mark 3:29), more
than ever in the name of Jesus Christ of Nazareth. Amen.

Laus DEO ! ! !

Again, this is done in hopes of convincing all reading this to stop
being http://bit.ly/terribly_hungry (2 Kings 6:29) where all are in
danger of becoming eternally condemned (Mark 3:29) just as had
happened to Ananias and Sapphira and more contemporaneously to Bob
Pastorio.

Again, the LORD did strike down http://bit.ly/Bob_Pastorio on Fool's
day just 9+ years ago:

http://bobs-amanuensis.livejournal.com/8728.html

Again, this is done ...

http://bit.ly/HeartDocAndrew touts hunger (Luke 6:21a) with all glory
( http://bit.ly/Psalm112_1 ) to GOD, Who causes us to hunger
(Deuteronomy 8:3) when He blesses us right now (Luke 6:21a) thereby
removing the http://WDJW.great-site.net/VAT from around the heart

...because we mindfully choose to openly care with our heart,

HeartDoc Andrew <><
--
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
Cardiologist with an http://bit.ly/EternalMedicalLicense
2024 & upwards non-partisan candidate for U.S. President: http://WonderfullyHungry.org
and author of the 2PD-OMER Approach:
http://bit.ly/HeartDocAndrewCare
which is the only **healthy** cure for the U.S. healthcare crisis

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: alt.bible.prophecy, soc.culture.usa, soc.culture.israel
XPost: uk.legal, alt.christnet.christianlife

Michael Ejercito wrote:

HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:

HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:

Michael Ejercito wrote:

https://ethicsalarms.com/2025/03/11/the-ethics-of-deporting-mahmoud-khalil-for-pro-terrorist-advocacy/

The Ethics of Deporting Mahmoud Khalil For Pro-Terrorist Advocacy
March 11, 2025 / Jack Marshall


ICE arrested Palestinian activist and former Columbia student Mahmoud >>>>> Khalil with the intent of deporting him in accordance with the announced >>>>> Trump policy of deporting non-citizens who engage in pro-�terrorist� >>>>> speech related to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Predictably, the >>>>> Axis is all-in supporting Khalil, who sure appears to be a bad human >>>>> hill to die on. Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez condemned ICE�s >>>>> detainment of Mahmoud Khalil, calling it a �tyrannical� move, �Violating >>>>> rule of law, actually,� she wrote. That AOC defends him alone makes me >>>>> inclined to want to get rid of the guy, but that would be irrational. >>>>> Judge Jesse Furman of the Southern District of New York issued an order >>>>> today halting Khalil�s processing and scheduled a hearing on the case >>>>> for later this week. Ah yes, the Southern District of New York!

In a confusing essay at The Volokh Conspiracy, Ilya Somin writes that >>>>> deporting non-citizens for the content of their speech is a Firts
Amendment violation and �a slippery slope,� then, in the fifth
paragraph, acknowledges that 8 U.S.C. � 1182(a)(3), bars �Any alien who >>>>> � endorses or espouses terrorist activity or persuades others to endorse >>>>> or espouse terrorist activity or support a terrorist organization.� I�d >>>>> say endorsing and supporting Hamas qualifies under that law, wouldn�t >>>>> you? So Somin says, �Such laws, too, should be ruled unconstitutional.� >>>>> But until and unless it is, the Trump administration has the law on its >>>>> side.

The question remains, is such a restriction on the free speech of
non-citizens ethical? Somin:

�The First Amendment�s protection for freedom of speech, like most
constitutional rights, is not limited to US citizens. The text of the >>>>> First Amendment is worded as a general limitation on government power, >>>>> not a form of special protection for a particular group of people, such >>>>> as US citizens or permanent residents. The Supreme Court held as much in >>>>> a 1945 case, where they ruled that �Freedom of speech and of press is >>>>> accorded aliens residing in this country.�


I find this absolutist approach fairly persuasive, because free speech >>>>> is safest when the exception to the First Amendment are rare. And yet, I >>>>> can also see the utilitarian value of a principle that says that while >>>>> one is a guest in this country and not yet a citizen, one should behave. >>>>> If you want full protection of the First Amendment, become a citizen. >>>>> Somin concedes that even if non-citizens have a right to free speech, >>>>> they don�t have a constitutional right to stay in the US so, arguably, >>>>> deporting them for disruptive speech doesn�t violate the Constitution. >>>>> But, he says, depriving people of a right as punishment for their speech >>>>> violates the First Amendment.

Except that residing in the U.S. when one is not a citizen isn�t a
right, but a privilege.

Somin also loses me�forever!�with this foolishness: �I would argue that >>>>> freedom of movement � including across international boundaries � is >>>>> also a human right, one that should not be restricted based on
arbitrary circumstances of parentage and place of birth.� That sounds >>>>> like an open boarders argument to me, and that is signature significance >>>>> for a scholar who is estranged from reality. Utopian positions that are >>>>> impossible in the real world are unethical: they just waste time and >>>>> confuse people.

Whether deporting non-citizen pro-terrorism advocates like Mahmoud
Khalil is constitutional, legal or ethical is a close call all around. >>>>> Presumably the U.S. Supreme Court will end up deciding.

The absolutely only godly way to permanently defeat all enemies of
Israel, including either Hamas and/or Hezbollah now but also all
others in the future, without sacrificing free speech is by lifting up >>>> Israel's http://WonderfullyHungry.org (Luke 24:42-3) Messiah.

Indeed, I am http://WonderfullyHungry.org (Philippians 4:12) for food
right now (Luke 6:21a) and hope you, Michael, and others reading this, >>>> also have a healthy appetite for food right now too.

So how are you ?

I am wonderfully hungry!

While wonderfully hungry in the Holy Spirit, Who causes (Deuteronomy
8:3) us to hunger, I note that you, Michael, are rapture ready (Luke
17:37 means no COVID just as eagles circling over their food have no
COVID) and pray (2 Chronicles 7:14) that our Everlasting (Isaiah 9:6)
Father in Heaven continues to give us "much more" (Luke 11:13) Holy
Spirit (Galatians 5:22-23) so that we'd have much more of His Help to
always say/write that we're "wonderfully hungry" in **all** ways
including especially caring to "convince it forward" (John 15:12) with
all glory (Psalm112:1) to GOD (aka HaShem, Elohim, Abba, DEO), in
the name (John 16:23) of LORD Jesus Christ of Nazareth. Amen.

Laus DEO !

Thank you for noting that I have no COVID.

Just please do likewise as our LORD Jesus & I have done for you,
Michael, and http://go.WDJW.net/ConvinceItForward (John 15:12) to be https://bit.ly/Wonderfully_Hungrier more blessed by GOD right now
(Luke 6:21a):

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3MK66v5lh4M

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: alt.bible.prophecy, soc.culture.usa, soc.culture.israel
XPost: uk.legal, alt.christnet.christianlife

Andrew 'Andrzej' Baron (aka SHEIN)about 15 hours ago

ReplyPermalinkOn Tue, 11 Mar 2025 21:50:20 -0700, NOT Michael Ejercito
Post by Michael Ejercito

Andrew 'Andrzej' Baron (aka SHEIN)about 15 hours ago

Never mind that, what about the ethics of deporting YOU for your
pro-semitic (aka ainlungual) advocacy?

Mangina, I am an American citizen!

Needledick, you are an illegal Flip Chinaman.

Nithing, there is nothing illegal, Flip, nor Chinaman about me!

You are a Nazi.

You are a gook.

That would be better than being a Nazi nithing.

As a Nazi, you are, above all else

Yup.

As a craven gook who zsuckles jew ani, you are, below all else

You are a nithing- homo sapiens by birth, subhuman BY CHOICE. The
key word is CHOICE. You were born with the same human nature as the
rest of us. Your CHOICES made you a nithing.

Bill explains what nithings are.

http://www.israpundit.com/2008/?p=9446

Define and Dehumanize the Enemy: Jihadists as Nithings or Nidings

by Bill Levinson
It is an ancient principle of magic (which modern people recognize as stories that reflect a society’s culture and psychology) that
knowledge of a person’s real or True Name delivers power over that
person. What it really means is that, if you know the person’s
psychology, you can gain an advantage over him. It is also well known
that the side that controls the language of an argument controls the
argument. As an example, Hamas terrorists and their enablers refer to Israel’s military as an “occupation force” and terrorisitic violence against civilians as “resistance.”

We have long sought a single word that strips the enemy of all
humanity, and reduces him to something less than an animal that is
worthy of nothing less than extermination. As far as we know, the
English language contains no such word, although “dreck” (garbage or refuse) comes close. “Homo sapiens by BIRTH, subhuman by CHOICE”
describes Islamic supremacists perfectly, but it is a phrase and not a
word. We now propose to refer to Islamic supremacists as nithings or
nidings: a Scandinavian word that strips its object of all humanity. Webster’s dictionary (1913) defines it as “A coward; a dastard; — a
term of utmost opprobrium.”

We remind readers who object to the dehumanization of Islamic
supremacists that those enemies are already attempting to dehumanize
Jews, and to a lesser degree Christians, with images that could have
come directly from Adolf Hitler. As they have chosen to sow the
dragon’s teeth, our position is that they must now reap their rightful harvest: the complete hatred and loathing of all civilized human
beings.
nithings

Nithing or niding was more than a common insult, because Scandinavian culture required its subject to fight a duel with the accuser or
become an outlaw: totally devoid of rights, honor, and even
recognition as a human being. Per the Wikipedia entry,

The actual meaning of the adjective argr or ragr [= Anglo-Saxon
earg] was the nature or appearance of effeminacy, especially by
obscene acts. Argr was the worst, most derogatory swearword of all
known to the Norse language. According to Icelandic law, the accused
was expected to kill the accuser at once. …If the accused did not
retort by violent attack yielding either the accuser to take his words
back or the accuser’s death, he was hence proven to be a weak and
cowardly nithing by not retorting accordingly.

A nithing was devoid of all human rights, and he was considered the
enemy of civilized humanity: a perfect depiction of Islamic
supremacists. The word therefore strips the enemy of all humanity, and
degrades him to the status of a wolf or strangler (per Scandinavian
tradition) or a virulent disease like the Black Plague. Black Plague
is a deadly and contagious disease whose vector consists of plague-
carrying rats, while the Green Plague of militant “Islam” is a deadly
and contagious ideology that is spread by bipedal rats: nidings or
nithings, non-humans that raise violent hands to all of civilized
Humanity.

The immediate consequence of being proven a nithing was
outlawing. The outlawed did not have any rights, he was exlex (Latin
for “outside of the legal system”), in Anglo-Saxon utlah, Middle Low
German uutlagh, Old Norse utlagr. Just as feud yielded enmity among
kinships, outlawry yielded enmity of all humanity.[63] …”Yet that is
but one aspect of outlawry. The outlaw is not only expelled from the
kinship, he is also regarded henceforth as an enemy to mankind.”

The actual definition of a nithing is somewhat more involved and
complex, and it gets into sexual perversions and zoomorphical
transformations (Loki’s transformation of himself into a mare to have
sexual intercourse with a stallion, and thus beget Odin’s horse
Sleipner is probably an example), but the following line is pertinent:
“The nithing used its malicious seid magic to destroy anything owned
and made by man, ultimately the human race and Midgard itself[6], due
to its basically unlimited envy, hate, and malice that were nith.”

"Destruction of everything owned and made by Man” (the Palestinians’ destruction of the greenhouses in Gaza comes to mind immediately) and “unlimited envy, hate, and malice” describe militant “Islam”
perfectly, and further underscore the application of nithing or niding
to describe it. The propensity for mindless destruction also appears
in Orson Scott Card’s Alvin Maker series, in which a supernatural
enemy is known as the Unmaker: a personification of evil that is the
total antithesis of God the Creator.

The Unmaker is the main antagonist in Orson Scott Card’s
alternate history/fantasy series The Tales of Alvin Maker. Never
directly confronted, it is a supernatural force that breaks apart
matter and aims to destroy and consume everything and everyone. …To
make something is to oppose the Unmaker, but a point often made is
that this is futile. By natural law the Unmaker can tear down faster
than any man can build.

This also is an outstanding definition of militant “Islam” or Islamic supremacy: an ideology that seeks to destroy everything into which it
comes in contact, and with which no reason, negotiation, or compromise
is possible.

In summary, a nithing or niding is the enemy of Civilization, a
subhuman (through its behavioral choices, and emphatically NOT due to
its racial or ethnic origin) monster with total hatred and malice
toward all human industry and arts, and worthy of nothing but
extermination like any virulent disease. This is the word we will now
apply to Islamic supremacists and their enablers, and we encourage
others to do likewise.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: alt.bible.prophecy, soc.culture.usa, soc.culture.israel
XPost: uk.legal, alt.christnet.christianlife

(Khalil) 03/12/25 Again praying w/ MichaelE here ...

https://narkive.com/ZSH4vvkA.5

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: alt.bible.prophecy, soc.culture.usa, soc.culture.israel
XPost: uk.legal, alt.christnet.christianlife

<Khalil> 03/13/25 Andrzej/KK again vainjangling (1 Tim 1:6) ...

https://groups.google.com/g/sci.med.cardiology/c/4tIJn_I167w/m/bKWQRUarAgAJ

Link to post explicating vainjangling by the eternally condemned: https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.med.cardiology/O23NguTslhI/-xLGqnNjAAAJ

"Like a moth to flame, the eternally condemned tragically return to be
ever more cursed by GOD."

Behold in wide-eyed wonder and amazement at the continued fulfillment
of this prophecy as clearly demonstrated within the following USENET
threads:

(1) Link to thread titled "LORD Jesus Christ of Nazareth is our #1
Example of being wonderfully hungry;"

https://groups.google.com/g/sci.med.cardiology/c/_iVmOb7q3_Q/m/E8L7TNNtAgAJ

(2) Link to thread titled "Being wonderfully hungry;"

https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/sci.med.cardiology/uCPb3ldOv5M

(3) Link to thread titled "A very very very simple definition of sin;"

https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/alt.bible.prophecy/xunFWhan_AM

(4) Link to thread titled "The LORD says 'Blessed are you who hunger
now;'"

https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/alt.bible.prophecy/e4sW8dr44rM

(5) Link to thread titled "Being wonderfully hungry like LORD Jesus;"

https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.bible.prophecy/xPY1Uzl-ZNk/QeKLDNCpCwAJ

... for the continued benefit (Romans 8:28) of those of us who are http://WonderfullyHungry.org like GOD ( http://bit.ly/Lk2442 ) with
all glory ( http://bit.ly/Psalm112_1 ) to the LORD.

Source: https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.med.cardiology/O23NguTslhI/pIZcsOCJBwAJ

Laus DEO !

While wonderfully hungry ( http://bit.ly/Philippians4_12 ) in the Holy
Spirit, Who causes (Deuteronomy 8:3) me to hunger right now (Luke
6:21a), I pray (2 Chronicles 7:14) that GOD continues to curse
(Jeremiah 17:5) you, who are eternally condemned (Mark 3:29), more
than ever in the name of Jesus Christ of Nazareth. Amen.

Laus DEO ! ! !

Bottom line: https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.med.cardiology/O23NguTslhI/h5lE-mr0DAAJ

<begin trichotomy>

(1) Born-again (John 3:3 & 5) humans - Folks who have GOD's Help (i.e.
Holy Spirit) to stop (John 5:14) sinning by being
http://WonderfullyHungry.org (Philippians 4:12) **but** are still
able to choose via their own "free will" to be instead http://bit.ly/terribly_hungry (Genesis 25:32) trapped in the
entangling (Hebrews 12:1) deadly (i.e. killed immortals Adam&Eve) sin
of gluttony (Proverbs 23:2).

(2) Eternally condemned (Mark 3:29) humans - Folks who will never have
GOD's Help (i.e. Holy Spirit) to stop being
http://bit.ly/terribly_hungry (2 Kings 6:29) as evident by their
constant vainjangling (1 Timothy 1:6) about everything except how to
stop (John 5:14) sinning.

(3) Perishing humans - The remaining folks who may possibly (Matthew
19:26) become born-again (John 3:3 & 5) as new (2 Corinthians 5:17)
creatures in Christ.

<end trichotomy>

Suggested further reading:
http://T3WiJ.com

+++

someone eternally condemned & ever more cursed by GOD wrote:

HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:

Subject: The LORD says "Blessed are you who hunger now ..."

Source: https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.bible.prophecy/e4sW8dr44rM/NSkTJxvFBAAJ

Shame on andrew, look at his red face.

LIE.

The color of my face in **not** visible here on USENET nor is the
color of my face red for those who can see me.

He is trying to pull a fast one. His scripture bit is found among these:

'14 Bible verses about Spiritual Hunger'

Such are the lies coming from the lying pens of the http://bit.ly/terribly_hungry (Genesis 25:32) commentators.

That which is "spiritual" is independent of time so that there
would've been no reference to "now."

Therefore, the LORD is referring to physical hunger here instead of
the spiritual "hunger and thirst for righteousness" elsewhere in
Scripture.

Indeed, physical hunger can **not** coexist with physical thirst
because the latter results in the loss of saliva needed for physical
hunger.

It is when we hunger for food "now" (Luke 6:21a) that we are able to
eat food "now."

No such time constraints exist for "spiritual hunger."

Moreover, the perspective of Luke 6:21a through the eyes of a
physician (i.e. Dr. Luke) would be logically expected to be physical
instead of spiritual.

All glory ( http://bit.ly/Psalm112_1 ) to GOD for His compelling you
to unwittingly demonstrate your ever worsening cognitive condition
which is tragically a consequence of His cursing (Jeremiah 17:5) you
more than ever.

Laus DEO !

+++

someone eternally condemned & ever more cursed by GOD perseverated:
(in a vain attempt to refute posts about being wonderfully hungry)

Psalms
81:10 I am the LORD thy God, which brought thee out of the land of Egypt: >open thy mouth wide, and I will fill it.

Indeed, receiving a mouthful (Psalm 81:10) of manna from GOD will only
make His http://WDJW.great-site.net/Redeemed want even more, so that
we're even http://bit.ly/wonderfully_hungrier with all glory ( http://bit.ly/Psalm112_1 ) to GOD.

Laus DEO !

Proverbs
13:25 The righteous has enough to satisfy his appetite, But the stomach of >the wicked is in need.

Indeed, the righteous know to be satisfied (Luke 6:21a) with an omer
(Exodus 16:16) of manna, while the wicked need (Proverbs 13:25) this
knowledge as evident by their eating until they are full (i.e.
satiated).

Joel
2:26 And ye shall eat in plenty, and be satisfied, and praise the name of
the LORD your God, that hath dealt wondrously with you: and my
people shall never be ashamed.

Indeed, an omer (32 ounces per Revelation 6:6) of manna is plenty
(Joel 2:26) with all glory ( http://bit.ly/Psalm112_1 ) to GOD and to
the shame of you, who are eternally (Mark 3:29) condemned.

Laus DEO ! !

Psalms
107 For he satisfies the thirsty and fills the hungry with good things.

Indeed, being filled (Psalm 107:9) with an omer (Exodus 16:16) of
manna is a Wonderful (Isaiah 9:6) thing while being satiated (i.e.
full) is evil.

Acts
14:17 "Yet he did not leave himself without witness, for he did good by >giving you rains from heaven and fruitful seasons, satisfying
your hearts with food and gladness."

In the interim, you, who are eternally (Mark 3:29) condemned, will
never be satisfied (Acts 14:17) because you are ever more cursed
(Jeremiah 17:5) by GOD.

Source: https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.med.cardiology/uCPb3ldOv5M/KgM8NFKuAQAJ

+++

someone eternally condemned & ever more cursed by GOD perseverated:

HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:

Subject: a very very very simple definition of sin ...

Source: https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.med.cardiology/mXmFD9kIocc/y8GNXircBQAJ

Does andrew's "definition" agree with scripture? Let's see in 1 John:

Actually, sin is **not** defined in 1 John 1:8-10

John wrote this to christians. The greek grammer (sic) speaks of an ongoing >> status. He includes himself in that status.

John was a Jew instead of a Greek so there is really no reason to
think that Greek grammar is relevant here.

1:8 If we say that we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, and the truth is
not in us.

1:9 If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just to forgive us our sins, >> and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness.

1:10 If we say that we have not sinned, we make him a liar, and his word is >> not in us.

John also wrote earlier at John 5:14 that LORD Jesus commands:

"Now stop sinning or something worse may happen to you." (John 5:14)

And, indeed, your being eternally condemned (Mark 3:29) & ever more
cursed (Jeremiah 17:5) by GOD, as evident by your ever worsening
cognitive deficits, is really worse.

Now again, here's how to really stop sinning as LORD Jesus commands
(John 5:14):

https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.bible.prophecy/2-Qpn-o81J4/ldGubKEZAgAJ

While wonderfully hungry ( http://bit.ly/Philippians4_12 ) in the Holy
Spirit, Who causes (Deuteronomy 8:3) me to hunger right now (Luke
6:21a), I again pray (2 Chronicles 7:14) that GOD continues to curse
(Jeremiah 17:5) you, who are eternally condemned (Mark 3:29), more
than ever in the name of Jesus Christ of Nazareth. Amen.

Laus DEO ! ! !

Again, this is done in hopes of convincing all reading this to stop
being http://bit.ly/terribly_hungry (2 Kings 6:29) where all are in
danger of becoming eternally condemned (Mark 3:29) just as had
happened to Ananias and Sapphira and more contemporaneously to Bob
Pastorio.

Again, the LORD did strike down http://bit.ly/Bob_Pastorio on Fool's
day just 9+ years ago:

http://bobs-amanuensis.livejournal.com/8728.html

Again, this is done ...

http://bit.ly/HeartDocAndrew touts hunger (Luke 6:21a) with all glory
( http://bit.ly/Psalm112_1 ) to GOD, Who causes us to hunger
(Deuteronomy 8:3) when He blesses us right now (Luke 6:21a) thereby
removing the http://WDJW.great-site.net/VAT from around the heart

...because we mindfully choose to openly care with our heart,

HeartDoc Andrew <><
--
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
Cardiologist with an http://bit.ly/EternalMedicalLicense
2024 & upwards non-partisan candidate for U.S. President: http://WonderfullyHungry.org
and author of the 2PD-OMER Approach:
http://bit.ly/HeartDocAndrewCare
which is the only **healthy** cure for the U.S. healthcare crisis

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: alt.bible.prophecy, soc.culture.usa, soc.culture.israel
XPost: uk.legal, alt.christnet.christianlife

Andrew 'Andrzej' Baron (aka SHEIN)a day ago

ReplyPermalinkOn Wed, 12 Mar 2025 20:46:43 -0700, NOT Michael Ejercito
Post by Michael Ejercito

Andrew 'Andrzej' Baron (aka SHEIN)about 15 hours ago

You are a gook.

That would be better than being a Nazi nithing.

How the fuck COULD it be, gook? We're WHITE. You're just an Oriental shitskin.

White may be relevant to superficial characteristics like sex
appeal; it has no relevance to honor, decency, and integrity.

The following article explains your pathology.










http://archive.boston.com/bostonglobe/editorial_opinion/oped/articles/2009/03/11/historys_oldest_hatred/


History's oldest hatred
By Jeff Jacoby
Globe Columnist / March 11, 2009
Email|Print|Single Page||Text size – +

ANTI-SEMITISM is an ancient derangement, the oldest of hatreds, so
it is strange that it lacks a more meaningful name. The misnomer "anti-Semitism" - a term coined in 1879 by the German agitator Wilhelm
Marr, who wanted a scientific-sounding euphemism for Judenhass, or
Jew-hatred - is particularly inane, since hostility to Jews has never
had anything to do with Semites or being Semitic.

Perhaps there is no good name for a virus as mutable as anti-Semitism.
"The Jews have been objects of hatred in pagan, religious, and secular societies," write Joseph Telushkin and Dennis Prager in "Why the Jews?,"
their classic study of anti-Semitism. "Fascists have accused them of
being Communists, and Communists have branded them capitalists. Jews who
live in non-Jewish societies have been accused of having dual loyalties,
while Jews who live in the Jewish state have been condemned as
'racists.' Poor Jews are bullied, and rich Jews are resented. Jews have
been branded as both rootless cosmopolitans and ethnic chauvinists. Jews
who assimilate have been called a 'fifth column,' while those who stay
together spark hatred for remaining separate."

There was Jew-hatred before there was Christianity or Islam, before
Nazism or Communism, before Zionism or the Middle East conflict. This
week Jews celebrate the festival of Purim, gathering in synagogues to
read the biblical book of Esther. Set in ancient Persia, it tells of
Haman, a powerful royal adviser who is insulted when the Jewish sage
Mordechai refuses to bow down to him. Haman resolves to wipe out the
empire's Jews and makes the case for genocide in an appeal to the king:

"There is a certain people scattered and dispersed among . . . all the provinces of your kingdom, and their laws are different from those of
other peoples, and the king's laws they do not keep, so it is of no
benefit for the king to tolerate them. If it please the king, let it be
written that they be destroyed."

When the king agrees, Haman makes plans "to annihilate, to kill and
destroy all the Jews, the young and the elderly, children and women, in
one day . . . and to take their property for plunder."

What drives such bloodlust? Haman's indictment accuses the Jews of
lacking national loyalty, of insinuating themselves throughout the
empire, of flouting the king's law. But the Jews of Persia had done
nothing to justify Haman's murderous anti-Semitism - just as Jews in
later ages did nothing that justified their persecution under the Church
or Islam, or their repression at the hands of Russian czars and Soviet commissars, or their slaughter by Nazi Germany. When the president of
Iran today calls for the extirpation of the Jewish state, when firebombs
are hurled at synagogues in London and Paris and Chicago, it is not
because Jews deserve to be victimized.

Many Jews are no saints, but the paranoid frenzy that is anti-Semitism
is not explained by what Jews do, but by what they are. They are the
object of anti-Semitism, not its cause. That is why the haters'
rationales can be so wildly inconsistent and their agendas so
contradictory. What do those who vilify Jews as greedy bankers have in
common with those who revile them as fiendish Bolsheviks? Nothing, save
an irrational obsession with Jews.

At one point, Haman lets the mask slip. He boasts to his friends and
family of "the glory of his riches, and the great number of his sons,
and everything in which the king had promoted him and elevated him."
Still, he seethes with rage and frustration: "Yet all this is worthless
to me so long as I see Mordechai the Jew sitting at the king's gate."
That is the unforgivable offense: "Mordechai the Jew" refuses to blend
in, to be just like everyone else. He goes on sitting there -
undigested, unassimilated, and therefore unbearable.

Of course Haman had his ostensible reasons for targeting Jews. So did Hitler and Arafat, so does Ahmadinejad. Sometimes the anti-Semite
focuses on the Jew's religion, sometimes on his laws and lifestyle,
sometimes on his professional achievements. Under it all, however, it is
the Jew's Jewishness that the anti-Semite cannot abide.

With all their flaws and failings, the Jewish people endure, their role
in history not yet finished. So the world's oldest hatred endures too,
as obsessive and indestructible - and deadly - as ever.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: alt.bible.prophecy, soc.culture.usa, soc.culture.israel
XPost: uk.legal, alt.christnet.christianlife

<Khalil> 03/14/25 Andrzej/KK again vainjangling (1 Tim 1:6) ...

https://groups.google.com/g/sci.med.cardiology/c/4tIJn_I167w/m/bKWQRUarAgAJ

Link to post explicating vainjangling by the eternally condemned: https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.med.cardiology/O23NguTslhI/-xLGqnNjAAAJ

"Like a moth to flame, the eternally condemned tragically return to be
ever more cursed by GOD."

Behold in wide-eyed wonder and amazement at the continued fulfillment
of this prophecy as clearly demonstrated within the following USENET
threads:

(1) Link to thread titled "LORD Jesus Christ of Nazareth is our #1
Example of being wonderfully hungry;"

https://groups.google.com/g/sci.med.cardiology/c/_iVmOb7q3_Q/m/E8L7TNNtAgAJ

(2) Link to thread titled "Being wonderfully hungry;"

https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/sci.med.cardiology/uCPb3ldOv5M

(3) Link to thread titled "A very very very simple definition of sin;"

https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/alt.bible.prophecy/xunFWhan_AM

(4) Link to thread titled "The LORD says 'Blessed are you who hunger
now;'"

https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/alt.bible.prophecy/e4sW8dr44rM

(5) Link to thread titled "Being wonderfully hungry like LORD Jesus;"

https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.bible.prophecy/xPY1Uzl-ZNk/QeKLDNCpCwAJ

... for the continued benefit (Romans 8:28) of those of us who are http://WonderfullyHungry.org like GOD ( http://bit.ly/Lk2442 ) with
all glory ( http://bit.ly/Psalm112_1 ) to the LORD.

Source: https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.med.cardiology/O23NguTslhI/pIZcsOCJBwAJ

Laus DEO !

While wonderfully hungry ( http://bit.ly/Philippians4_12 ) in the Holy
Spirit, Who causes (Deuteronomy 8:3) me to hunger right now (Luke
6:21a), I pray (2 Chronicles 7:14) that GOD continues to curse
(Jeremiah 17:5) you, who are eternally condemned (Mark 3:29), more
than ever in the name of Jesus Christ of Nazareth. Amen.

Laus DEO ! ! !

Bottom line: https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.med.cardiology/O23NguTslhI/h5lE-mr0DAAJ

<begin trichotomy>

(1) Born-again (John 3:3 & 5) humans - Folks who have GOD's Help (i.e.
Holy Spirit) to stop (John 5:14) sinning by being
http://WonderfullyHungry.org (Philippians 4:12) **but** are still
able to choose via their own "free will" to be instead http://bit.ly/terribly_hungry (Genesis 25:32) trapped in the
entangling (Hebrews 12:1) deadly (i.e. killed immortals Adam&Eve) sin
of gluttony (Proverbs 23:2).

(2) Eternally condemned (Mark 3:29) humans - Folks who will never have
GOD's Help (i.e. Holy Spirit) to stop being
http://bit.ly/terribly_hungry (2 Kings 6:29) as evident by their
constant vainjangling (1 Timothy 1:6) about everything except how to
stop (John 5:14) sinning.

(3) Perishing humans - The remaining folks who may possibly (Matthew
19:26) become born-again (John 3:3 & 5) as new (2 Corinthians 5:17)
creatures in Christ.

<end trichotomy>

Suggested further reading:
http://T3WiJ.com

+++

someone eternally condemned & ever more cursed by GOD wrote:

HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:

Subject: The LORD says "Blessed are you who hunger now ..."

Source: https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.bible.prophecy/e4sW8dr44rM/NSkTJxvFBAAJ

Shame on andrew, look at his red face.

LIE.

The color of my face in **not** visible here on USENET nor is the
color of my face red for those who can see me.

He is trying to pull a fast one. His scripture bit is found among these:

'14 Bible verses about Spiritual Hunger'

Such are the lies coming from the lying pens of the http://bit.ly/terribly_hungry (Genesis 25:32) commentators.

That which is "spiritual" is independent of time so that there
would've been no reference to "now."

Therefore, the LORD is referring to physical hunger here instead of
the spiritual "hunger and thirst for righteousness" elsewhere in
Scripture.

Indeed, physical hunger can **not** coexist with physical thirst
because the latter results in the loss of saliva needed for physical
hunger.

It is when we hunger for food "now" (Luke 6:21a) that we are able to
eat food "now."

No such time constraints exist for "spiritual hunger."

Moreover, the perspective of Luke 6:21a through the eyes of a
physician (i.e. Dr. Luke) would be logically expected to be physical
instead of spiritual.

All glory ( http://bit.ly/Psalm112_1 ) to GOD for His compelling you
to unwittingly demonstrate your ever worsening cognitive condition
which is tragically a consequence of His cursing (Jeremiah 17:5) you
more than ever.

Laus DEO !

+++

someone eternally condemned & ever more cursed by GOD perseverated:
(in a vain attempt to refute posts about being wonderfully hungry)

Psalms
81:10 I am the LORD thy God, which brought thee out of the land of Egypt: >open thy mouth wide, and I will fill it.

Indeed, receiving a mouthful (Psalm 81:10) of manna from GOD will only
make His http://WDJW.great-site.net/Redeemed want even more, so that
we're even http://bit.ly/wonderfully_hungrier with all glory ( http://bit.ly/Psalm112_1 ) to GOD.

Laus DEO !

Proverbs
13:25 The righteous has enough to satisfy his appetite, But the stomach of >the wicked is in need.

Indeed, the righteous know to be satisfied (Luke 6:21a) with an omer
(Exodus 16:16) of manna, while the wicked need (Proverbs 13:25) this
knowledge as evident by their eating until they are full (i.e.
satiated).

Joel
2:26 And ye shall eat in plenty, and be satisfied, and praise the name of
the LORD your God, that hath dealt wondrously with you: and my
people shall never be ashamed.

Indeed, an omer (32 ounces per Revelation 6:6) of manna is plenty
(Joel 2:26) with all glory ( http://bit.ly/Psalm112_1 ) to GOD and to
the shame of you, who are eternally (Mark 3:29) condemned.

Laus DEO ! !

Psalms
107 For he satisfies the thirsty and fills the hungry with good things.

Indeed, being filled (Psalm 107:9) with an omer (Exodus 16:16) of
manna is a Wonderful (Isaiah 9:6) thing while being satiated (i.e.
full) is evil.

Acts
14:17 "Yet he did not leave himself without witness, for he did good by >giving you rains from heaven and fruitful seasons, satisfying
your hearts with food and gladness."

In the interim, you, who are eternally (Mark 3:29) condemned, will
never be satisfied (Acts 14:17) because you are ever more cursed
(Jeremiah 17:5) by GOD.

Source: https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.med.cardiology/uCPb3ldOv5M/KgM8NFKuAQAJ

+++

someone eternally condemned & ever more cursed by GOD perseverated:

HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:

Subject: a very very very simple definition of sin ...

Source: https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.med.cardiology/mXmFD9kIocc/y8GNXircBQAJ

Does andrew's "definition" agree with scripture? Let's see in 1 John:

Actually, sin is **not** defined in 1 John 1:8-10

John wrote this to christians. The greek grammer (sic) speaks of an ongoing >> status. He includes himself in that status.

John was a Jew instead of a Greek so there is really no reason to
think that Greek grammar is relevant here.

1:8 If we say that we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, and the truth is
not in us.

1:9 If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just to forgive us our sins, >> and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness.

1:10 If we say that we have not sinned, we make him a liar, and his word is >> not in us.

John also wrote earlier at John 5:14 that LORD Jesus commands:

"Now stop sinning or something worse may happen to you." (John 5:14)

And, indeed, your being eternally condemned (Mark 3:29) & ever more
cursed (Jeremiah 17:5) by GOD, as evident by your ever worsening
cognitive deficits, is really worse.

Now again, here's how to really stop sinning as LORD Jesus commands
(John 5:14):

https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.bible.prophecy/2-Qpn-o81J4/ldGubKEZAgAJ

While wonderfully hungry ( http://bit.ly/Philippians4_12 ) in the Holy
Spirit, Who causes (Deuteronomy 8:3) me to hunger right now (Luke
6:21a), I again pray (2 Chronicles 7:14) that GOD continues to curse
(Jeremiah 17:5) you, who are eternally condemned (Mark 3:29), more
than ever in the name of Jesus Christ of Nazareth. Amen.

Laus DEO ! ! !

Again, this is done in hopes of convincing all reading this to stop
being http://bit.ly/terribly_hungry (2 Kings 6:29) where all are in
danger of becoming eternally condemned (Mark 3:29) just as had
happened to Ananias and Sapphira and more contemporaneously to Bob
Pastorio.

Again, the LORD did strike down http://bit.ly/Bob_Pastorio on Fool's
day just 9+ years ago:

http://bobs-amanuensis.livejournal.com/8728.html

Again, this is done ...

http://bit.ly/HeartDocAndrew touts hunger (Luke 6:21a) with all glory
( http://bit.ly/Psalm112_1 ) to GOD, Who causes us to hunger
(Deuteronomy 8:3) when He blesses us right now (Luke 6:21a) thereby
removing the http://WDJW.great-site.net/VAT from around the heart

...because we mindfully choose to openly care with our heart,

HeartDoc Andrew <><
--
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
Cardiologist with an http://bit.ly/EternalMedicalLicense
2024 & upwards non-partisan candidate for U.S. President: http://WonderfullyHungry.org
and author of the 2PD-OMER Approach:
http://bit.ly/HeartDocAndrewCare
which is the only **healthy** cure for the U.S. healthcare crisis

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: alt.bible.prophecy, soc.culture.usa, soc.culture.israel
XPost: uk.legal, alt.christnet.christianlife

Andrew 'Andrzej' Baron (aka SHEIN)4 days ago

ReplyPermalinkOn Fri, 14 Mar 2025 07:55:17 -0700, NOT Michael Ejercito

White DEFINES who is eligible for honour, decency and integrity. WE
are, you are NOT.

Wrong!

It is determined by choices and by conduct!

The following article explains your pathology.

Zsuckling jew ani explains yours, gook.

Strip away the racism, the Judenhass, the Holocaust denial, the
baseless accusations of bestiality, the perversion, the deportation
fantasies, the buggerism, the rape victim blaming, the sheer fear of
Chris, and the support for strangling babies, and what is left?


Michael

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: alt.bible.prophecy, soc.culture.usa, soc.culture.israel
XPost: uk.legal, alt.christnet.christianlife

(Khalil) 03/18/25 Again praying w/ MichaelE here ...

https://narkive.com/ZSH4vvkA.5

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)