XPost: alt.bible.prophecy, soc.culture.usa, soc.culture.israel
XPost: talk.abortion

https://ethicsalarms.com/2025/05/28/re-abortion-another-bias-makes-you-stupid-op-ed-in-the-nyt/

Re Abortion: Another “Bias Makes You Stupid” Op-Ed in the NYT
May 28, 2025 / Jack Marshall


It’s kind of funny when headline writers are so clueless and biased that
what they think is a “res ipsa loquitur” story proving one thing
actually reveals something completely different.

The headline on a Times op-ed ed last week was “A Brain-Dead Woman Is
Being Kept on Machines to Gestate a Fetus. It Was Inevitable.” (I’m
using my last gift link of the month on this one, so you’d better read
it!) The writer was Kimberly Mutcherson, a professor at Rutgers Law School.

The entire piece radiates contempt for the concept of treating the
unborn as human lives, which, you know, they are and rather undeniably
so. Readers are informed that Adriana Smith is brain dead, and has been connected to life support machines for more than 90 days to save the
life of her baby. Smith was nine weeks pregnant when she died from
multiple blood clots in her brain.

“Her fetus’s heart continued to beat,” writes the professor, as if it
was an abandoned car with a functioning carburetor. Georgia, she
explains, is one of those crazy, fetus-worshiping states where a nascent
human being is deemed a human life that can’t be snuffed out on a whim
if it has a heartbeat. This, to the op-ed’s author, the headline writer
and the New York Times is completely unfathomable.


“Legislators did not seem to have considered a situation in which a
pregnant woman is legally dead,” she sneers. Funny, I don’t see why the death of the mother compels the decision that the child she is carrying
should be considered a non-person and a life not worth saving. The
professor quotes the dead woman’s mother as saying, “We want the baby. That’s a part of my daughter. But the decision should have been left to
us — not the state.” Wait: don’t we all believe that it is a proper function of the state to protect the lives of human beings and to pass
laws that embody that duty? Do families have the option of letting the
children of parents who are killed die from neglect because it’s the family’s “choice”?


What is stunning (depressing, annoying, telling) about Mutcherson’s
essay is that she can’t grasp why anyone would argue that a brain dead
mother should be kept alive so a vulnerable human being can become
strong enough to live a life outside her womb. Many quotes in the op-ed
make that clear, like…

“Reproductive justice advocates have long been clear that abortion law
is never only about abortion. It is about the exercise of control over
all pregnant women, regardless of whether they plan to carry their
pregnancies to term. That’s why the anti-abortion movement has pursued a broad agenda of legal personhood for embryos and fetuses.” My comment:
“The Horror”! These misguided people think that a human being’s life should be saved if at all possible. The monsters! This is the “It isn’t what it is,” “Handmaiden’s Tale” propaganda of the political left, not objective analysis. Anti-abortion advocates think that living human
beings shouldn’t be killed, that’s all. The position has nothing to do
with “controlling” the people who want to kill them any more than laws against murder are “about the exercise of control” over citizens who
would like to kill someone.
“This kind of catastrophic event was inevitable, given the expansive and imprecise laws written by legislators who generally lack medical
expertise, and the inability of politicians to fully predict every
emergency situation.” My comment: The professor isn’t referring to the mother’s death as the “catastrophic event,” but rather the brain dead woman’s body being kept functioning so her baby can be born. I can
conceive of valid arguments for why this should be considered bad policy
or a situation requiring special legislation. But what’s the
catastrophe? The author is incapable of comprehending that in a
utilitarian analysis, a Kantian analysis favoring human life, and
reciprocity principles (“If you were the fetus, what would you want the hospital to do?”), the situation is thoroughly defensible.
“Emory University Hospital, once Ms. Smith’s place of employment, would
not be legally allowed to remove organs from a brain-dead person without
family consent if this person hadn’t previously registered her wish to
be a donor, even if doing so could save or improve dozens of lives.
However, according to Ms. Smith’s mother, the hospital informed her
that, because of the fetus her daughter was carrying, it could not
legally withdraw the artificial means of keeping her body functioning.”
My comment: So? The professor thinks that’s an apt analogy: the dead woman’s organs can’t be harvested without her prior consent, so they
will be allowed to die along with her. But a liver isn’t a human being.
Never mind; abortion advocates can’t concede that what is at stake in an abortion decision is a second human life. If they do, they know what
abortion becomes.
“Knowing the tremendous work that the body of a pregnant woman must do
to sustain and nourish a pregnancy, the harm to the fetus from being
trapped inside a body without a functioning brain cannot be known with certainty.” My comment: Consequentialism, the refuge of the ethically
inert: “It’s a bad decision because it might not work.”
Mutcherson concludes by calling the situation “dystopian”—there’s “The
Handmaiden’s Tale” mentality again. She can see no benefit or reason to
try to save a human life. Bias has not only rendered her stupid, but so
morally and ethically blind she can’t see the other side of a genuine
ethics conflict.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: alt.bible.prophecy, soc.culture.usa, soc.culture.israel
XPost: talk.abortion, alt.christnet.christianlife

Michael Ejercito wrote:

https://ethicsalarms.com/2025/05/28/re-abortion-another-bias-makes-you-stupid-op-ed-in-the-nyt/

Re Abortion: Another �Bias Makes You Stupid� Op-Ed in the NYT
May 28, 2025 / Jack Marshall

It�s kind of funny when headline writers are so clueless and biased that
what they think is a �res ipsa loquitur� story proving one thing
actually reveals something completely different.

The headline on a Times op-ed ed last week was �A Brain-Dead Woman Is
Being Kept on Machines to Gestate a Fetus. It Was Inevitable.� (I�m
using my last gift link of the month on this one, so you�d better read
it!) The writer was Kimberly Mutcherson, a professor at Rutgers Law School.

The entire piece radiates contempt for the concept of treating the
unborn as human lives, which, you know, they are and rather undeniably
so. Readers are informed that Adriana Smith is brain dead, and has been >connected to life support machines for more than 90 days to save the
life of her baby. Smith was nine weeks pregnant when she died from
multiple blood clots in her brain.

�Her fetus�s heart continued to beat,� writes the professor, as if it
was an abandoned car with a functioning carburetor. Georgia, she
explains, is one of those crazy, fetus-worshiping states where a nascent >human being is deemed a human life that can�t be snuffed out on a whim
if it has a heartbeat. This, to the op-ed�s author, the headline writer
and the New York Times is completely unfathomable.

�Legislators did not seem to have considered a situation in which a
pregnant woman is legally dead,� she sneers. Funny, I don�t see why the
death of the mother compels the decision that the child she is carrying >should be considered a non-person and a life not worth saving. The
professor quotes the dead woman�s mother as saying, �We want the baby.
That�s a part of my daughter. But the decision should have been left to
us � not the state.� Wait: don�t we all believe that it is a proper
function of the state to protect the lives of human beings and to pass
laws that embody that duty? Do families have the option of letting the >children of parents who are killed die from neglect because it�s the
family�s �choice�?

What is stunning (depressing, annoying, telling) about Mutcherson�s
essay is that she can�t grasp why anyone would argue that a brain dead
mother should be kept alive so a vulnerable human being can become
strong enough to live a life outside her womb. Many quotes in the op-ed
make that clear, like�

�Reproductive justice advocates have long been clear that abortion law
is never only about abortion. It is about the exercise of control over
all pregnant women, regardless of whether they plan to carry their >pregnancies to term. That�s why the anti-abortion movement has pursued a >broad agenda of legal personhood for embryos and fetuses.� My comment:
�The Horror�! These misguided people think that a human being�s life
should be saved if at all possible. The monsters! This is the �It isn�t
what it is,� �Handmaiden�s Tale� propaganda of the political left, not >objective analysis. Anti-abortion advocates think that living human
beings shouldn�t be killed, that�s all. The position has nothing to do
with �controlling� the people who want to kill them any more than laws >against murder are �about the exercise of control� over citizens who
would like to kill someone.
�This kind of catastrophic event was inevitable, given the expansive and >imprecise laws written by legislators who generally lack medical
expertise, and the inability of politicians to fully predict every
emergency situation.� My comment: The professor isn�t referring to the >mother�s death as the �catastrophic event,� but rather the brain dead
woman�s body being kept functioning so her baby can be born. I can
conceive of valid arguments for why this should be considered bad policy
or a situation requiring special legislation. But what�s the
catastrophe? The author is incapable of comprehending that in a
utilitarian analysis, a Kantian analysis favoring human life, and
reciprocity principles (�If you were the fetus, what would you want the >hospital to do?�), the situation is thoroughly defensible.
�Emory University Hospital, once Ms. Smith�s place of employment, would
not be legally allowed to remove organs from a brain-dead person without >family consent if this person hadn�t previously registered her wish to
be a donor, even if doing so could save or improve dozens of lives.
However, according to Ms. Smith�s mother, the hospital informed her
that, because of the fetus her daughter was carrying, it could not
legally withdraw the artificial means of keeping her body functioning.�
My comment: So? The professor thinks that�s an apt analogy: the dead
woman�s organs can�t be harvested without her prior consent, so they
will be allowed to die along with her. But a liver isn�t a human being.
Never mind; abortion advocates can�t concede that what is at stake in an >abortion decision is a second human life. If they do, they know what
abortion becomes.
�Knowing the tremendous work that the body of a pregnant woman must do
to sustain and nourish a pregnancy, the harm to the fetus from being
trapped inside a body without a functioning brain cannot be known with >certainty.� My comment: Consequentialism, the refuge of the ethically
inert: �It�s a bad decision because it might not work.�
Mutcherson concludes by calling the situation �dystopian��there�s �The >Handmaiden�s Tale� mentality again. She can see no benefit or reason to
try to save a human life. Bias has not only rendered her stupid, but so >morally and ethically blind she can�t see the other side of a genuine
ethics conflict.

"It's written that GOD punished David&Bathsheba w/ a full-term
abortion for their adultery. Thus, abortion reminds us that the
adultery of http://AntiChrist45.com (#TrumpIsTheAntiChrist) is the sin
to stop..."

Source:
https://x.com/WDJW/status/1926364784917676335

The absolutely only godly way to stop the sin of adultery (thereby
stopping abortions) is by holding up our #1 Example of living http://WonderfullyHungry.org (Luke 24:42-3).

Indeed, I am http://WonderfullyHungry.org (Philippians 4:12) for food
right now (Luke 6:21a) and hope you, Michael, and others reading this,
also have a healthy appetite for food right now too.

So how are you ?

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: alt.bible.prophecy, soc.culture.usa, soc.culture.israel
XPost: talk.abortion, alt.christnet.christianlife

HeartDoc Andrew wrote:

Michael Ejercito wrote:

https://ethicsalarms.com/2025/05/28/re-abortion-another-bias-makes-you-stupid-op-ed-in-the-nyt/

Re Abortion: Another “Bias Makes You Stupid” Op-Ed in the NYT
May 28, 2025 / Jack Marshall


It’s kind of funny when headline writers are so clueless and biased that >> what they think is a “res ipsa loquitur” story proving one thing
actually reveals something completely different.

The headline on a Times op-ed ed last week was “A Brain-Dead Woman Is
Being Kept on Machines to Gestate a Fetus. It Was Inevitable.” (I’m
using my last gift link of the month on this one, so you’d better read
it!) The writer was Kimberly Mutcherson, a professor at Rutgers Law School. >>
The entire piece radiates contempt for the concept of treating the
unborn as human lives, which, you know, they are and rather undeniably
so. Readers are informed that Adriana Smith is brain dead, and has been
connected to life support machines for more than 90 days to save the
life of her baby. Smith was nine weeks pregnant when she died from
multiple blood clots in her brain.

“Her fetus’s heart continued to beat,” writes the professor, as if it >> was an abandoned car with a functioning carburetor. Georgia, she
explains, is one of those crazy, fetus-worshiping states where a nascent
human being is deemed a human life that can’t be snuffed out on a whim
if it has a heartbeat. This, to the op-ed’s author, the headline writer
and the New York Times is completely unfathomable.


“Legislators did not seem to have considered a situation in which a
pregnant woman is legally dead,” she sneers. Funny, I don’t see why the >> death of the mother compels the decision that the child she is carrying
should be considered a non-person and a life not worth saving. The
professor quotes the dead woman’s mother as saying, “We want the baby. >> That’s a part of my daughter. But the decision should have been left to
us — not the state.” Wait: don’t we all believe that it is a proper
function of the state to protect the lives of human beings and to pass
laws that embody that duty? Do families have the option of letting the
children of parents who are killed die from neglect because it’s the
family’s “choice”?


What is stunning (depressing, annoying, telling) about Mutcherson’s
essay is that she can’t grasp why anyone would argue that a brain dead
mother should be kept alive so a vulnerable human being can become
strong enough to live a life outside her womb. Many quotes in the op-ed
make that clear, like…

“Reproductive justice advocates have long been clear that abortion law
is never only about abortion. It is about the exercise of control over
all pregnant women, regardless of whether they plan to carry their
pregnancies to term. That’s why the anti-abortion movement has pursued a >> broad agenda of legal personhood for embryos and fetuses.” My comment:
“The Horror”! These misguided people think that a human being’s life >> should be saved if at all possible. The monsters! This is the “It isn’t >> what it is,” “Handmaiden’s Tale” propaganda of the political left, not
objective analysis. Anti-abortion advocates think that living human
beings shouldn’t be killed, that’s all. The position has nothing to do >> with “controlling” the people who want to kill them any more than laws >> against murder are “about the exercise of control” over citizens who
would like to kill someone.
“This kind of catastrophic event was inevitable, given the expansive and >> imprecise laws written by legislators who generally lack medical
expertise, and the inability of politicians to fully predict every
emergency situation.” My comment: The professor isn’t referring to the >> mother’s death as the “catastrophic event,” but rather the brain dead >> woman’s body being kept functioning so her baby can be born. I can
conceive of valid arguments for why this should be considered bad policy
or a situation requiring special legislation. But what’s the
catastrophe? The author is incapable of comprehending that in a
utilitarian analysis, a Kantian analysis favoring human life, and
reciprocity principles (“If you were the fetus, what would you want the
hospital to do?”), the situation is thoroughly defensible.
“Emory University Hospital, once Ms. Smith’s place of employment, would >> not be legally allowed to remove organs from a brain-dead person without
family consent if this person hadn’t previously registered her wish to
be a donor, even if doing so could save or improve dozens of lives.
However, according to Ms. Smith’s mother, the hospital informed her
that, because of the fetus her daughter was carrying, it could not
legally withdraw the artificial means of keeping her body functioning.”
My comment: So? The professor thinks that’s an apt analogy: the dead
woman’s organs can’t be harvested without her prior consent, so they
will be allowed to die along with her. But a liver isn’t a human being.
Never mind; abortion advocates can’t concede that what is at stake in an >> abortion decision is a second human life. If they do, they know what
abortion becomes.
“Knowing the tremendous work that the body of a pregnant woman must do
to sustain and nourish a pregnancy, the harm to the fetus from being
trapped inside a body without a functioning brain cannot be known with
certainty.” My comment: Consequentialism, the refuge of the ethically
inert: “It’s a bad decision because it might not work.”
Mutcherson concludes by calling the situation “dystopian”—there’s “The
Handmaiden’s Tale” mentality again. She can see no benefit or reason to >> try to save a human life. Bias has not only rendered her stupid, but so
morally and ethically blind she can’t see the other side of a genuine
ethics conflict.

"It's written that GOD punished David&Bathsheba w/ a full-term
abortion for their adultery. Thus, abortion reminds us that the
adultery of http://AntiChrist45.com (#TrumpIsTheAntiChrist) is the sin
to stop..."

Source:
https://x.com/WDJW/status/1926364784917676335

The absolutely only godly way to stop the sin of adultery (thereby
stopping abortions) is by holding up our #1 Example of living http://WonderfullyHungry.org (Luke 24:42-3).

Indeed.

Indeed, I am http://WonderfullyHungry.org (Philippians 4:12) for food
right now (Luke 6:21a) and hope you, Michael, and others reading this,
also have a healthy appetite for food right now too.

So how are you ?

I am wonderfully hungry!


Michael

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: alt.bible.prophecy, soc.culture.usa, soc.culture.israel
XPost: talk.abortion, alt.christnet.christianlife

Michael Ejercito wrote:

HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:

Michael Ejercito wrote:

https://ethicsalarms.com/2025/05/28/re-abortion-another-bias-makes-you-stupid-op-ed-in-the-nyt/

Re Abortion: Another �Bias Makes You Stupid� Op-Ed in the NYT
May 28, 2025 / Jack Marshall


It�s kind of funny when headline writers are so clueless and biased that >>> what they think is a �res ipsa loquitur� story proving one thing
actually reveals something completely different.

The headline on a Times op-ed ed last week was �A Brain-Dead Woman Is
Being Kept on Machines to Gestate a Fetus. It Was Inevitable.� (I�m
using my last gift link of the month on this one, so you�d better read
it!) The writer was Kimberly Mutcherson, a professor at Rutgers Law School. >>>
The entire piece radiates contempt for the concept of treating the
unborn as human lives, which, you know, they are and rather undeniably
so. Readers are informed that Adriana Smith is brain dead, and has been
connected to life support machines for more than 90 days to save the
life of her baby. Smith was nine weeks pregnant when she died from
multiple blood clots in her brain.

�Her fetus�s heart continued to beat,� writes the professor, as if it
was an abandoned car with a functioning carburetor. Georgia, she
explains, is one of those crazy, fetus-worshiping states where a nascent >>> human being is deemed a human life that can�t be snuffed out on a whim
if it has a heartbeat. This, to the op-ed�s author, the headline writer
and the New York Times is completely unfathomable.


�Legislators did not seem to have considered a situation in which a
pregnant woman is legally dead,� she sneers. Funny, I don�t see why the
death of the mother compels the decision that the child she is carrying
should be considered a non-person and a life not worth saving. The
professor quotes the dead woman�s mother as saying, �We want the baby.
That�s a part of my daughter. But the decision should have been left to
us � not the state.� Wait: don�t we all believe that it is a proper
function of the state to protect the lives of human beings and to pass
laws that embody that duty? Do families have the option of letting the
children of parents who are killed die from neglect because it�s the
family�s �choice�?


What is stunning (depressing, annoying, telling) about Mutcherson�s
essay is that she can�t grasp why anyone would argue that a brain dead
mother should be kept alive so a vulnerable human being can become
strong enough to live a life outside her womb. Many quotes in the op-ed
make that clear, like�

�Reproductive justice advocates have long been clear that abortion law
is never only about abortion. It is about the exercise of control over
all pregnant women, regardless of whether they plan to carry their
pregnancies to term. That�s why the anti-abortion movement has pursued a >>> broad agenda of legal personhood for embryos and fetuses.� My comment:
�The Horror�! These misguided people think that a human being�s life
should be saved if at all possible. The monsters! This is the �It isn�t
what it is,� �Handmaiden�s Tale� propaganda of the political left, not
objective analysis. Anti-abortion advocates think that living human
beings shouldn�t be killed, that�s all. The position has nothing to do
with �controlling� the people who want to kill them any more than laws
against murder are �about the exercise of control� over citizens who
would like to kill someone.
�This kind of catastrophic event was inevitable, given the expansive and >>> imprecise laws written by legislators who generally lack medical
expertise, and the inability of politicians to fully predict every
emergency situation.� My comment: The professor isn�t referring to the
mother�s death as the �catastrophic event,� but rather the brain dead
woman�s body being kept functioning so her baby can be born. I can
conceive of valid arguments for why this should be considered bad policy >>> or a situation requiring special legislation. But what�s the
catastrophe? The author is incapable of comprehending that in a
utilitarian analysis, a Kantian analysis favoring human life, and
reciprocity principles (�If you were the fetus, what would you want the
hospital to do?�), the situation is thoroughly defensible.
�Emory University Hospital, once Ms. Smith�s place of employment, would
not be legally allowed to remove organs from a brain-dead person without >>> family consent if this person hadn�t previously registered her wish to
be a donor, even if doing so could save or improve dozens of lives.
However, according to Ms. Smith�s mother, the hospital informed her
that, because of the fetus her daughter was carrying, it could not
legally withdraw the artificial means of keeping her body functioning.�
My comment: So? The professor thinks that�s an apt analogy: the dead
woman�s organs can�t be harvested without her prior consent, so they
will be allowed to die along with her. But a liver isn�t a human being.
Never mind; abortion advocates can�t concede that what is at stake in an >>> abortion decision is a second human life. If they do, they know what
abortion becomes.
�Knowing the tremendous work that the body of a pregnant woman must do
to sustain and nourish a pregnancy, the harm to the fetus from being
trapped inside a body without a functioning brain cannot be known with
certainty.� My comment: Consequentialism, the refuge of the ethically
inert: �It�s a bad decision because it might not work.�
Mutcherson concludes by calling the situation �dystopian��there�s �The
Handmaiden�s Tale� mentality again. She can see no benefit or reason to
try to save a human life. Bias has not only rendered her stupid, but so
morally and ethically blind she can�t see the other side of a genuine
ethics conflict.

"It's written that GOD punished David&Bathsheba w/ a full-term
abortion for their adultery. Thus, abortion reminds us that the
adultery of http://AntiChrist45.com (#TrumpIsTheAntiChrist) is the sin
to stop..."

Source:
https://x.com/WDJW/status/1926364784917676335

The absolutely only godly way to stop the sin of adultery (thereby
stopping abortions) is by holding up our #1 Example of living
http://WonderfullyHungry.org (Luke 24:42-3).

Indeed.

Indeed, I am http://WonderfullyHungry.org (Philippians 4:12) for food
right now (Luke 6:21a) and hope you, Michael, and others reading this,
also have a healthy appetite for food right now too.

So how are you ?

I am wonderfully hungry!

While wonderfully hungry in the Holy Spirit, Who causes (Deuteronomy
8:3) us to hunger, I note that you, Michael, are rapture ready (Luke
17:37 means no COVID just as eagles circling over their food have no
COVID) and pray (2 Chronicles 7:14) that our Everlasting (Isaiah 9:6)
Father in Heaven continues to give us "much more" (Luke 11:13) Holy
Spirit (Galatians 5:22-23) so that we'd have much more of His Help to
always say/write that we're "wonderfully hungry" in **all** ways
including especially caring to "convince it forward" (John 15:12) with
all glory (Psalm112:1) to GOD (aka HaShem, Elohim, Abba, DEO), in
the name (John 16:23) of LORD Jesus Christ of Nazareth. Amen.

Laus DEO !

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: alt.bible.prophecy, soc.culture.usa, soc.culture.israel
XPost: talk.abortion, alt.christnet.christianlife

HeartDoc Andrew wrote:

Michael Ejercito wrote:

HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:

Michael Ejercito wrote:

https://ethicsalarms.com/2025/05/28/re-abortion-another-bias-makes-you-stupid-op-ed-in-the-nyt/

Re Abortion: Another “Bias Makes You Stupid” Op-Ed in the NYT
May 28, 2025 / Jack Marshall


It’s kind of funny when headline writers are so clueless and biased that >>>> what they think is a “res ipsa loquitur” story proving one thing
actually reveals something completely different.

The headline on a Times op-ed ed last week was “A Brain-Dead Woman Is >>>> Being Kept on Machines to Gestate a Fetus. It Was Inevitable.” (I’m >>>> using my last gift link of the month on this one, so you’d better read >>>> it!) The writer was Kimberly Mutcherson, a professor at Rutgers Law School.

The entire piece radiates contempt for the concept of treating the
unborn as human lives, which, you know, they are and rather undeniably >>>> so. Readers are informed that Adriana Smith is brain dead, and has been >>>> connected to life support machines for more than 90 days to save the
life of her baby. Smith was nine weeks pregnant when she died from
multiple blood clots in her brain.

“Her fetus’s heart continued to beat,” writes the professor, as if it
was an abandoned car with a functioning carburetor. Georgia, she
explains, is one of those crazy, fetus-worshiping states where a nascent >>>> human being is deemed a human life that can’t be snuffed out on a whim >>>> if it has a heartbeat. This, to the op-ed’s author, the headline writer >>>> and the New York Times is completely unfathomable.


“Legislators did not seem to have considered a situation in which a
pregnant woman is legally dead,” she sneers. Funny, I don’t see why the
death of the mother compels the decision that the child she is carrying >>>> should be considered a non-person and a life not worth saving. The
professor quotes the dead woman’s mother as saying, “We want the baby. >>>> That’s a part of my daughter. But the decision should have been left to >>>> us — not the state.” Wait: don’t we all believe that it is a proper >>>> function of the state to protect the lives of human beings and to pass >>>> laws that embody that duty? Do families have the option of letting the >>>> children of parents who are killed die from neglect because it’s the >>>> family’s “choice”?


What is stunning (depressing, annoying, telling) about Mutcherson’s
essay is that she can’t grasp why anyone would argue that a brain dead >>>> mother should be kept alive so a vulnerable human being can become
strong enough to live a life outside her womb. Many quotes in the op-ed >>>> make that clear, like…

“Reproductive justice advocates have long been clear that abortion law >>>> is never only about abortion. It is about the exercise of control over >>>> all pregnant women, regardless of whether they plan to carry their
pregnancies to term. That’s why the anti-abortion movement has pursued a >>>> broad agenda of legal personhood for embryos and fetuses.” My comment: >>>> “The Horror”! These misguided people think that a human being’s life >>>> should be saved if at all possible. The monsters! This is the “It isn’t
what it is,” “Handmaiden’s Tale” propaganda of the political left, not
objective analysis. Anti-abortion advocates think that living human
beings shouldn’t be killed, that’s all. The position has nothing to do >>>> with “controlling” the people who want to kill them any more than laws >>>> against murder are “about the exercise of control” over citizens who >>>> would like to kill someone.
“This kind of catastrophic event was inevitable, given the expansive and >>>> imprecise laws written by legislators who generally lack medical
expertise, and the inability of politicians to fully predict every
emergency situation.” My comment: The professor isn’t referring to the >>>> mother’s death as the “catastrophic event,” but rather the brain dead
woman’s body being kept functioning so her baby can be born. I can
conceive of valid arguments for why this should be considered bad policy >>>> or a situation requiring special legislation. But what’s the
catastrophe? The author is incapable of comprehending that in a
utilitarian analysis, a Kantian analysis favoring human life, and
reciprocity principles (“If you were the fetus, what would you want the >>>> hospital to do?”), the situation is thoroughly defensible.
“Emory University Hospital, once Ms. Smith’s place of employment, would
not be legally allowed to remove organs from a brain-dead person without >>>> family consent if this person hadn’t previously registered her wish to >>>> be a donor, even if doing so could save or improve dozens of lives.
However, according to Ms. Smith’s mother, the hospital informed her
that, because of the fetus her daughter was carrying, it could not
legally withdraw the artificial means of keeping her body functioning.” >>>> My comment: So? The professor thinks that’s an apt analogy: the dead >>>> woman’s organs can’t be harvested without her prior consent, so they >>>> will be allowed to die along with her. But a liver isn’t a human being. >>>> Never mind; abortion advocates can’t concede that what is at stake in an >>>> abortion decision is a second human life. If they do, they know what
abortion becomes.
“Knowing the tremendous work that the body of a pregnant woman must do >>>> to sustain and nourish a pregnancy, the harm to the fetus from being
trapped inside a body without a functioning brain cannot be known with >>>> certainty.” My comment: Consequentialism, the refuge of the ethically >>>> inert: “It’s a bad decision because it might not work.”
Mutcherson concludes by calling the situation “dystopian”—there’s “The
Handmaiden’s Tale” mentality again. She can see no benefit or reason to
try to save a human life. Bias has not only rendered her stupid, but so >>>> morally and ethically blind she can’t see the other side of a genuine >>>> ethics conflict.

"It's written that GOD punished David&Bathsheba w/ a full-term
abortion for their adultery. Thus, abortion reminds us that the
adultery of http://AntiChrist45.com (#TrumpIsTheAntiChrist) is the sin
to stop..."

Source:
https://x.com/WDJW/status/1926364784917676335

The absolutely only godly way to stop the sin of adultery (thereby
stopping abortions) is by holding up our #1 Example of living
http://WonderfullyHungry.org (Luke 24:42-3).

Indeed.

Indeed, I am http://WonderfullyHungry.org (Philippians 4:12) for food
right now (Luke 6:21a) and hope you, Michael, and others reading this,
also have a healthy appetite for food right now too.

So how are you ?

I am wonderfully hungry!

While wonderfully hungry in the Holy Spirit, Who causes (Deuteronomy
8:3) us to hunger, I note that you, Michael, are rapture ready (Luke
17:37 means no COVID just as eagles circling over their food have no
COVID) and pray (2 Chronicles 7:14) that our Everlasting (Isaiah 9:6)
Father in Heaven continues to give us "much more" (Luke 11:13) Holy
Spirit (Galatians 5:22-23) so that we'd have much more of His Help to
always say/write that we're "wonderfully hungry" in **all** ways
including especially caring to "convince it forward" (John 15:12) with
all glory (Psalm112:1) to GOD (aka HaShem, Elohim, Abba, DEO), in
the name (John 16:23) of LORD Jesus Christ of Nazareth. Amen.

Laus DEO !

Thank you for noting that I have no COVID.


Michael

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: alt.bible.prophecy, soc.culture.usa, soc.culture.israel
XPost: talk.abortion

On Wed, 28 May 2025 06:27:42 -0700, Michael Ejercito
<MEjercit@HotMail.com> wrote:

https://ethicsalarms.com/2025/05/28/re-abortion-another-bias-makes-you-stupid-op-ed-in-the-nyt/

Re Abortion: Another �Bias Makes You Stupid� Op-Ed in the NYT
May 28, 2025 / Jack Marshall

<DELETE INCOHERENT APE NONSENSE>

Gooks, jews, coons and other untermensch should be encouraged to abort
their fetus filth.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: alt.bible.prophecy, soc.culture.usa, soc.culture.israel
XPost: talk.abortion

<Kimberly> 05/29/25 Loose/KK tragically vainjangling (1 Tim 1:6) ...

https://groups.google.com/g/sci.med.cardiology/c/4tIJn_I167w/m/bKWQRUarAgAJ

Link to post explicating vainjangling by the eternally condemned: https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.med.cardiology/O23NguTslhI/-xLGqnNjAAAJ

"Like a moth to flame, the eternally condemned tragically return to be
ever more cursed by GOD."

Behold in wide-eyed wonder and amazement at the continued fulfillment
of this prophecy as clearly demonstrated within the following USENET
threads:

(1) Link to thread titled "LORD Jesus Christ of Nazareth is our #1
Example of being wonderfully hungry;"

https://groups.google.com/g/sci.med.cardiology/c/_iVmOb7q3_Q/m/E8L7TNNtAgAJ

(2) Link to thread titled "Being wonderfully hungry;"

https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/sci.med.cardiology/uCPb3ldOv5M

(3) Link to thread titled "A very very very simple definition of sin;"

https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/alt.bible.prophecy/xunFWhan_AM

(4) Link to thread titled "The LORD says 'Blessed are you who hunger
now;'"

https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/alt.bible.prophecy/e4sW8dr44rM

(5) Link to thread titled "Being wonderfully hungry like LORD Jesus;"

https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.bible.prophecy/xPY1Uzl-ZNk/QeKLDNCpCwAJ

... for the continued benefit (Romans 8:28) of those of us who are http://WonderfullyHungry.org like GOD ( http://bit.ly/Lk2442 ) with
all glory ( http://bit.ly/Psalm112_1 ) to the LORD.

Source: https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.med.cardiology/O23NguTslhI/pIZcsOCJBwAJ

Laus DEO !

While wonderfully hungry ( http://bit.ly/Philippians4_12 ) in the Holy
Spirit, Who causes (Deuteronomy 8:3) me to hunger right now (Luke
6:21a), I pray (2 Chronicles 7:14) that GOD continues to curse
(Jeremiah 17:5) you, who are eternally condemned (Mark 3:29), more
than ever in the name of Jesus Christ of Nazareth. Amen.

Laus DEO ! ! !

Bottom line: https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.med.cardiology/O23NguTslhI/h5lE-mr0DAAJ

<begin trichotomy>

(1) Born-again (John 3:3 & 5) humans - Folks who have GOD's Help (i.e.
Holy Spirit) to stop (John 5:14) sinning by being
http://WonderfullyHungry.org (Philippians 4:12) **but** are still
able to choose via their own "free will" to be instead http://bit.ly/terribly_hungry (Genesis 25:32) trapped in the
entangling (Hebrews 12:1) deadly (i.e. killed immortals Adam&Eve) sin
of gluttony (Proverbs 23:2).

(2) Eternally condemned (Mark 3:29) humans - Folks who will never have
GOD's Help (i.e. Holy Spirit) to stop being
http://bit.ly/terribly_hungry (2 Kings 6:29) as evident by their
constant vainjangling (1 Timothy 1:6) about everything except how to
stop (John 5:14) sinning.

(3) Perishing humans - The remaining folks who may possibly (Matthew
19:26) become born-again (John 3:3 & 5) as new (2 Corinthians 5:17)
creatures in Christ.

<end trichotomy>

Suggested further reading:
http://T3WiJ.com

+++

someone eternally condemned & ever more cursed by GOD wrote:

HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:

Subject: The LORD says "Blessed are you who hunger now ..."

Source: https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.bible.prophecy/e4sW8dr44rM/NSkTJxvFBAAJ

Shame on andrew, look at his red face.

LIE.

The color of my face in **not** visible here on USENET nor is the
color of my face red for those who can see me.

He is trying to pull a fast one. His scripture bit is found among these:

'14 Bible verses about Spiritual Hunger'

Such are the lies coming from the lying pens of the http://bit.ly/terribly_hungry (Genesis 25:32) commentators.

That which is "spiritual" is independent of time so that there
would've been no reference to "now."

Therefore, the LORD is referring to physical hunger here instead of
the spiritual "hunger and thirst for righteousness" elsewhere in
Scripture.

Indeed, physical hunger can **not** coexist with physical thirst
because the latter results in the loss of saliva needed for physical
hunger.

It is when we hunger for food "now" (Luke 6:21a) that we are able to
eat food "now."

No such time constraints exist for "spiritual hunger."

Moreover, the perspective of Luke 6:21a through the eyes of a
physician (i.e. Dr. Luke) would be logically expected to be physical
instead of spiritual.

All glory ( http://bit.ly/Psalm112_1 ) to GOD for His compelling you
to unwittingly demonstrate your ever worsening cognitive condition
which is tragically a consequence of His cursing (Jeremiah 17:5) you
more than ever.

Laus DEO !

+++

someone eternally condemned & ever more cursed by GOD perseverated:
(in a vain attempt to refute posts about being wonderfully hungry)

Psalms
81:10 I am the LORD thy God, which brought thee out of the land of Egypt: >open thy mouth wide, and I will fill it.

Indeed, receiving a mouthful (Psalm 81:10) of manna from GOD will only
make His http://WDJW.great-site.net/Redeemed want even more, so that
we're even http://bit.ly/wonderfully_hungrier with all glory ( http://bit.ly/Psalm112_1 ) to GOD.

Laus DEO !

Proverbs
13:25 The righteous has enough to satisfy his appetite, But the stomach of >the wicked is in need.

Indeed, the righteous know to be satisfied (Luke 6:21a) with an omer
(Exodus 16:16) of manna, while the wicked need (Proverbs 13:25) this
knowledge as evident by their eating until they are full (i.e.
satiated).

Joel
2:26 And ye shall eat in plenty, and be satisfied, and praise the name of
the LORD your God, that hath dealt wondrously with you: and my
people shall never be ashamed.

Indeed, an omer (32 ounces per Revelation 6:6) of manna is plenty
(Joel 2:26) with all glory ( http://bit.ly/Psalm112_1 ) to GOD and to
the shame of you, who are eternally (Mark 3:29) condemned.

Laus DEO ! !

Psalms
107 For he satisfies the thirsty and fills the hungry with good things.

Indeed, being filled (Psalm 107:9) with an omer (Exodus 16:16) of
manna is a Wonderful (Isaiah 9:6) thing while being satiated (i.e.
full) is evil.

Acts
14:17 "Yet he did not leave himself without witness, for he did good by >giving you rains from heaven and fruitful seasons, satisfying
your hearts with food and gladness."

In the interim, you, who are eternally (Mark 3:29) condemned, will
never be satisfied (Acts 14:17) because you are ever more cursed
(Jeremiah 17:5) by GOD.

Source: https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.med.cardiology/uCPb3ldOv5M/KgM8NFKuAQAJ

+++

someone eternally condemned & ever more cursed by GOD perseverated:

HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:

Subject: a very very very simple definition of sin ...

Source: https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.med.cardiology/mXmFD9kIocc/y8GNXircBQAJ

Does andrew's "definition" agree with scripture? Let's see in 1 John:

Actually, sin is **not** defined in 1 John 1:8-10

John wrote this to christians. The greek grammer (sic) speaks of an ongoing >> status. He includes himself in that status.

John was a Jew instead of a Greek so there is really no reason to
think that Greek grammar is relevant here.

1:8 If we say that we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, and the truth is
not in us.

1:9 If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just to forgive us our sins, >> and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness.

1:10 If we say that we have not sinned, we make him a liar, and his word is >> not in us.

John also wrote earlier at John 5:14 that LORD Jesus commands:

"Now stop sinning or something worse may happen to you." (John 5:14)

And, indeed, your being eternally condemned (Mark 3:29) & ever more
cursed (Jeremiah 17:5) by GOD, as evident by your ever worsening
cognitive deficits, is really worse.

Now again, here's how to really stop sinning as LORD Jesus commands
(John 5:14):

https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.bible.prophecy/2-Qpn-o81J4/ldGubKEZAgAJ

While wonderfully hungry ( http://bit.ly/Philippians4_12 ) in the Holy
Spirit, Who causes (Deuteronomy 8:3) me to hunger right now (Luke
6:21a), I again pray (2 Chronicles 7:14) that GOD continues to curse
(Jeremiah 17:5) you, who are eternally condemned (Mark 3:29), more
than ever in the name of Jesus Christ of Nazareth. Amen.

Laus DEO ! ! !

Again, this is done in hopes of convincing all reading this to stop
being http://bit.ly/terribly_hungry (2 Kings 6:29) where all are in
danger of becoming eternally condemned (Mark 3:29) just as had
happened to Ananias and Sapphira and more contemporaneously to Bob
Pastorio.

Again, the LORD did strike down http://bit.ly/Bob_Pastorio on Fool's
day just 9+ years ago:

http://bobs-amanuensis.livejournal.com/8728.html

Again, this is done ...

http://bit.ly/HeartDocAndrew touts hunger (Luke 6:21a) with all glory
( http://bit.ly/Psalm112_1 ) to GOD, Who causes us to hunger
(Deuteronomy 8:3) when He blesses us right now (Luke 6:21a) thereby
removing the http://WDJW.great-site.net/VAT from around the heart

...because we mindfully choose to openly care with our heart,

HeartDoc Andrew <><
--
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
Cardiologist with an http://bit.ly/EternalMedicalLicense
2024 & upwards non-partisan candidate for U.S. President: http://WonderfullyHungry.org
and author of the 2PD-OMER Approach:
http://bit.ly/HeartDocAndrewCare
which is the only **healthy** cure for the U.S. healthcare crisis

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: alt.bible.prophecy, soc.culture.usa, soc.culture.israel
XPost: talk.abortion

Loose Cannon wrote:

On Wed, 28 May 2025 06:27:42 -0700, Michael Ejercito
<MEjercit@HotMail.com> wrote:

https://ethicsalarms.com/2025/05/28/re-abortion-another-bias-makes-you-stupid-op-ed-in-the-nyt/

Re Abortion: Another “Bias Makes You Stupid” Op-Ed in the NYT
May 28, 2025 / Jack Marshall

<DELETE INCOHERENT APE NONSENSE>

Gooks, jews, coons and other untermensch should be encouraged to abort
their fetus filth.

Why would you want that?

Check out this video about a woman talking about her first pregnancy.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pVRMB83a5uM

Here is what she wrote in the YouTube video description.

"I think I am most excited to see what my baby will look like
because of the mixed race half white (super white) half Vietnamese
anyone know any babies of this race I would love to see pictures!!!!"


Michael

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: alt.bible.prophecy, soc.culture.usa, soc.culture.israel
XPost: talk.abortion, alt.christnet.christianlife

(Kimberly) 05/29/25 Again praying w/ MichaelE here ...

https://narkive.com/VkiRiBmZ.6

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: alt.bible.prophecy, soc.culture.usa, soc.culture.israel
XPost: talk.abortion

On Thu, 29 May 2025 09:09:00 -0700, Michael Ejercito
<MEjercit@HotMail.com> wrote:

Loose Cannon wrote:

On Wed, 28 May 2025 06:27:42 -0700, Michael Ejercito
<MEjercit@HotMail.com> wrote:

https://ethicsalarms.com/2025/05/28/re-abortion-another-bias-makes-you-stupid-op-ed-in-the-nyt/

Re Abortion: Another �Bias Makes You Stupid� Op-Ed in the NYT
May 28, 2025 / Jack Marshall

<DELETE INCOHERENT APE NONSENSE>

Gooks, jews, coons and other untermensch should be encouraged to abort
their fetus filth.

Why would you want that?

The world will be a better place.

Check out this video about a woman talking about her first pregnancy.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pVRMB83a5uM

Here is what she wrote in the YouTube video description.

"I think I am most excited to see what my baby will look like
because of the mixed race half white (super white) half Vietnamese
anyone know any babies of this race I would love to see pictures!!!!"

Michael

That is absolutely disgusting. If anything , that video only enhances
my position that all sub-human life should be terminated at its
source.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: alt.bible.prophecy, soc.culture.usa, soc.culture.israel
XPost: talk.abortion

<Kimberly> 05/29/25 Loose/KK tragicallyX2 vainjangling (1 Tim 1:6) ...

https://groups.google.com/g/sci.med.cardiology/c/4tIJn_I167w/m/bKWQRUarAgAJ

Link to post explicating vainjangling by the eternally condemned: https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.med.cardiology/O23NguTslhI/-xLGqnNjAAAJ

"Like a moth to flame, the eternally condemned tragically return to be
ever more cursed by GOD."

Behold in wide-eyed wonder and amazement at the continued fulfillment
of this prophecy as clearly demonstrated within the following USENET
threads:

(1) Link to thread titled "LORD Jesus Christ of Nazareth is our #1
Example of being wonderfully hungry;"

https://groups.google.com/g/sci.med.cardiology/c/_iVmOb7q3_Q/m/E8L7TNNtAgAJ

(2) Link to thread titled "Being wonderfully hungry;"

https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/sci.med.cardiology/uCPb3ldOv5M

(3) Link to thread titled "A very very very simple definition of sin;"

https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/alt.bible.prophecy/xunFWhan_AM

(4) Link to thread titled "The LORD says 'Blessed are you who hunger
now;'"

https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/alt.bible.prophecy/e4sW8dr44rM

(5) Link to thread titled "Being wonderfully hungry like LORD Jesus;"

https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.bible.prophecy/xPY1Uzl-ZNk/QeKLDNCpCwAJ

... for the continued benefit (Romans 8:28) of those of us who are http://WonderfullyHungry.org like GOD ( http://bit.ly/Lk2442 ) with
all glory ( http://bit.ly/Psalm112_1 ) to the LORD.

Source: https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.med.cardiology/O23NguTslhI/pIZcsOCJBwAJ

Laus DEO !

While wonderfully hungry ( http://bit.ly/Philippians4_12 ) in the Holy
Spirit, Who causes (Deuteronomy 8:3) me to hunger right now (Luke
6:21a), I pray (2 Chronicles 7:14) that GOD continues to curse
(Jeremiah 17:5) you, who are eternally condemned (Mark 3:29), more
than ever in the name of Jesus Christ of Nazareth. Amen.

Laus DEO ! ! !

Bottom line: https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.med.cardiology/O23NguTslhI/h5lE-mr0DAAJ

<begin trichotomy>

(1) Born-again (John 3:3 & 5) humans - Folks who have GOD's Help (i.e.
Holy Spirit) to stop (John 5:14) sinning by being
http://WonderfullyHungry.org (Philippians 4:12) **but** are still
able to choose via their own "free will" to be instead http://bit.ly/terribly_hungry (Genesis 25:32) trapped in the
entangling (Hebrews 12:1) deadly (i.e. killed immortals Adam&Eve) sin
of gluttony (Proverbs 23:2).

(2) Eternally condemned (Mark 3:29) humans - Folks who will never have
GOD's Help (i.e. Holy Spirit) to stop being
http://bit.ly/terribly_hungry (2 Kings 6:29) as evident by their
constant vainjangling (1 Timothy 1:6) about everything except how to
stop (John 5:14) sinning.

(3) Perishing humans - The remaining folks who may possibly (Matthew
19:26) become born-again (John 3:3 & 5) as new (2 Corinthians 5:17)
creatures in Christ.

<end trichotomy>

Suggested further reading:
http://T3WiJ.com

+++

someone eternally condemned & ever more cursed by GOD wrote:

HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:

Subject: The LORD says "Blessed are you who hunger now ..."

Source: https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.bible.prophecy/e4sW8dr44rM/NSkTJxvFBAAJ

Shame on andrew, look at his red face.

LIE.

The color of my face in **not** visible here on USENET nor is the
color of my face red for those who can see me.

He is trying to pull a fast one. His scripture bit is found among these:

'14 Bible verses about Spiritual Hunger'

Such are the lies coming from the lying pens of the http://bit.ly/terribly_hungry (Genesis 25:32) commentators.

That which is "spiritual" is independent of time so that there
would've been no reference to "now."

Therefore, the LORD is referring to physical hunger here instead of
the spiritual "hunger and thirst for righteousness" elsewhere in
Scripture.

Indeed, physical hunger can **not** coexist with physical thirst
because the latter results in the loss of saliva needed for physical
hunger.

It is when we hunger for food "now" (Luke 6:21a) that we are able to
eat food "now."

No such time constraints exist for "spiritual hunger."

Moreover, the perspective of Luke 6:21a through the eyes of a
physician (i.e. Dr. Luke) would be logically expected to be physical
instead of spiritual.

All glory ( http://bit.ly/Psalm112_1 ) to GOD for His compelling you
to unwittingly demonstrate your ever worsening cognitive condition
which is tragically a consequence of His cursing (Jeremiah 17:5) you
more than ever.

Laus DEO !

+++

someone eternally condemned & ever more cursed by GOD perseverated:
(in a vain attempt to refute posts about being wonderfully hungry)

Psalms
81:10 I am the LORD thy God, which brought thee out of the land of Egypt: >open thy mouth wide, and I will fill it.

Indeed, receiving a mouthful (Psalm 81:10) of manna from GOD will only
make His http://WDJW.great-site.net/Redeemed want even more, so that
we're even http://bit.ly/wonderfully_hungrier with all glory ( http://bit.ly/Psalm112_1 ) to GOD.

Laus DEO !

Proverbs
13:25 The righteous has enough to satisfy his appetite, But the stomach of >the wicked is in need.

Indeed, the righteous know to be satisfied (Luke 6:21a) with an omer
(Exodus 16:16) of manna, while the wicked need (Proverbs 13:25) this
knowledge as evident by their eating until they are full (i.e.
satiated).

Joel
2:26 And ye shall eat in plenty, and be satisfied, and praise the name of
the LORD your God, that hath dealt wondrously with you: and my
people shall never be ashamed.

Indeed, an omer (32 ounces per Revelation 6:6) of manna is plenty
(Joel 2:26) with all glory ( http://bit.ly/Psalm112_1 ) to GOD and to
the shame of you, who are eternally (Mark 3:29) condemned.

Laus DEO ! !

Psalms
107 For he satisfies the thirsty and fills the hungry with good things.

Indeed, being filled (Psalm 107:9) with an omer (Exodus 16:16) of
manna is a Wonderful (Isaiah 9:6) thing while being satiated (i.e.
full) is evil.

Acts
14:17 "Yet he did not leave himself without witness, for he did good by >giving you rains from heaven and fruitful seasons, satisfying
your hearts with food and gladness."

In the interim, you, who are eternally (Mark 3:29) condemned, will
never be satisfied (Acts 14:17) because you are ever more cursed
(Jeremiah 17:5) by GOD.

Source: https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.med.cardiology/uCPb3ldOv5M/KgM8NFKuAQAJ

+++

someone eternally condemned & ever more cursed by GOD perseverated:

HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:

Subject: a very very very simple definition of sin ...

Source: https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.med.cardiology/mXmFD9kIocc/y8GNXircBQAJ

Does andrew's "definition" agree with scripture? Let's see in 1 John:

Actually, sin is **not** defined in 1 John 1:8-10

John wrote this to christians. The greek grammer (sic) speaks of an ongoing >> status. He includes himself in that status.

John was a Jew instead of a Greek so there is really no reason to
think that Greek grammar is relevant here.

1:8 If we say that we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, and the truth is
not in us.

1:9 If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just to forgive us our sins, >> and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness.

1:10 If we say that we have not sinned, we make him a liar, and his word is >> not in us.

John also wrote earlier at John 5:14 that LORD Jesus commands:

"Now stop sinning or something worse may happen to you." (John 5:14)

And, indeed, your being eternally condemned (Mark 3:29) & ever more
cursed (Jeremiah 17:5) by GOD, as evident by your ever worsening
cognitive deficits, is really worse.

Now again, here's how to really stop sinning as LORD Jesus commands
(John 5:14):

https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.bible.prophecy/2-Qpn-o81J4/ldGubKEZAgAJ

While wonderfully hungry ( http://bit.ly/Philippians4_12 ) in the Holy
Spirit, Who causes (Deuteronomy 8:3) me to hunger right now (Luke
6:21a), I again pray (2 Chronicles 7:14) that GOD continues to curse
(Jeremiah 17:5) you, who are eternally condemned (Mark 3:29), more
than ever in the name of Jesus Christ of Nazareth. Amen.

Laus DEO ! ! !

Again, this is done in hopes of convincing all reading this to stop
being http://bit.ly/terribly_hungry (2 Kings 6:29) where all are in
danger of becoming eternally condemned (Mark 3:29) just as had
happened to Ananias and Sapphira and more contemporaneously to Bob
Pastorio.

Again, the LORD did strike down http://bit.ly/Bob_Pastorio on Fool's
day just 9+ years ago:

http://bobs-amanuensis.livejournal.com/8728.html

Again, this is done ...

http://bit.ly/HeartDocAndrew touts hunger (Luke 6:21a) with all glory
( http://bit.ly/Psalm112_1 ) to GOD, Who causes us to hunger
(Deuteronomy 8:3) when He blesses us right now (Luke 6:21a) thereby
removing the http://WDJW.great-site.net/VAT from around the heart

...because we mindfully choose to openly care with our heart,

HeartDoc Andrew <><
--
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
Cardiologist with an http://bit.ly/EternalMedicalLicense
2024 & upwards non-partisan candidate for U.S. President: http://WonderfullyHungry.org
and author of the 2PD-OMER Approach:
http://bit.ly/HeartDocAndrewCare
which is the only **healthy** cure for the U.S. healthcare crisis

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: alt.bible.prophecy, soc.culture.usa, soc.culture.israel
XPost: talk.abortion

Loose Cannon wrote:

On Thu, 29 May 2025 09:09:00 -0700, Michael Ejercito
<MEjercit@HotMail.com> wrote:

Loose Cannon wrote:

On Wed, 28 May 2025 06:27:42 -0700, Michael Ejercito
<MEjercit@HotMail.com> wrote:

https://ethicsalarms.com/2025/05/28/re-abortion-another-bias-makes-you-stupid-op-ed-in-the-nyt/

Re Abortion: Another “Bias Makes You Stupid” Op-Ed in the NYT
May 28, 2025 / Jack Marshall

<DELETE INCOHERENT APE NONSENSE>

Gooks, jews, coons and other untermensch should be encouraged to abort
their fetus filth.

Why would you want that?

The world will be a better place.

No, it would not.

Check out this video about a woman talking about her first pregnancy.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pVRMB83a5uM

Here is what she wrote in the YouTube video description.

"I think I am most excited to see what my baby will look like
because of the mixed race half white (super white) half Vietnamese
anyone know any babies of this race I would love to see pictures!!!!"


Michael

That is absolutely disgusting.

No, it is not.

How can pregnancy possibly be disgusting?

If anything , that video only enhances
my position that all sub-human life should be terminated at its
source.

Just look at a picture of this same woman with her husband and five children.

https://www.instagram.com/p/DDs2mnZJp7G/

And here is a more recent video.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AUM66mEE6fY

How can you call any of them subhuman?


Michael

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: alt.bible.prophecy, soc.culture.usa, soc.culture.israel
XPost: talk.abortion, alt.christnet.christianlife

(Kimberly) 05/29/25 AgainX2 praying w/ MichaelE here ...

https://narkive.com/VkiRiBmZ.6

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: alt.bible.prophecy, soc.culture.usa, soc.culture.israel
XPost: talk.abortion

<Kimberly> 05/30/25 Loose/KK tragically vainjangling (1 Tim 1:6) ...

https://groups.google.com/g/sci.med.cardiology/c/4tIJn_I167w/m/bKWQRUarAgAJ

Link to post explicating vainjangling by the eternally condemned: https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.med.cardiology/O23NguTslhI/-xLGqnNjAAAJ

"Like a moth to flame, the eternally condemned tragically return to be
ever more cursed by GOD."

Behold in wide-eyed wonder and amazement at the continued fulfillment
of this prophecy as clearly demonstrated within the following USENET
threads:

(1) Link to thread titled "LORD Jesus Christ of Nazareth is our #1
Example of being wonderfully hungry;"

https://groups.google.com/g/sci.med.cardiology/c/_iVmOb7q3_Q/m/E8L7TNNtAgAJ

(2) Link to thread titled "Being wonderfully hungry;"

https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/sci.med.cardiology/uCPb3ldOv5M

(3) Link to thread titled "A very very very simple definition of sin;"

https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/alt.bible.prophecy/xunFWhan_AM

(4) Link to thread titled "The LORD says 'Blessed are you who hunger
now;'"

https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/alt.bible.prophecy/e4sW8dr44rM

(5) Link to thread titled "Being wonderfully hungry like LORD Jesus;"

https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.bible.prophecy/xPY1Uzl-ZNk/QeKLDNCpCwAJ

... for the continued benefit (Romans 8:28) of those of us who are http://WonderfullyHungry.org like GOD ( http://bit.ly/Lk2442 ) with
all glory ( http://bit.ly/Psalm112_1 ) to the LORD.

Source: https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.med.cardiology/O23NguTslhI/pIZcsOCJBwAJ

Laus DEO !

While wonderfully hungry ( http://bit.ly/Philippians4_12 ) in the Holy
Spirit, Who causes (Deuteronomy 8:3) me to hunger right now (Luke
6:21a), I pray (2 Chronicles 7:14) that GOD continues to curse
(Jeremiah 17:5) you, who are eternally condemned (Mark 3:29), more
than ever in the name of Jesus Christ of Nazareth. Amen.

Laus DEO ! ! !

Bottom line: https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.med.cardiology/O23NguTslhI/h5lE-mr0DAAJ

<begin trichotomy>

(1) Born-again (John 3:3 & 5) humans - Folks who have GOD's Help (i.e.
Holy Spirit) to stop (John 5:14) sinning by being
http://WonderfullyHungry.org (Philippians 4:12) **but** are still
able to choose via their own "free will" to be instead http://bit.ly/terribly_hungry (Genesis 25:32) trapped in the
entangling (Hebrews 12:1) deadly (i.e. killed immortals Adam&Eve) sin
of gluttony (Proverbs 23:2).

(2) Eternally condemned (Mark 3:29) humans - Folks who will never have
GOD's Help (i.e. Holy Spirit) to stop being
http://bit.ly/terribly_hungry (2 Kings 6:29) as evident by their
constant vainjangling (1 Timothy 1:6) about everything except how to
stop (John 5:14) sinning.

(3) Perishing humans - The remaining folks who may possibly (Matthew
19:26) become born-again (John 3:3 & 5) as new (2 Corinthians 5:17)
creatures in Christ.

<end trichotomy>

Suggested further reading:
http://T3WiJ.com

+++

someone eternally condemned & ever more cursed by GOD wrote:

HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:

Subject: The LORD says "Blessed are you who hunger now ..."

Source: https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.bible.prophecy/e4sW8dr44rM/NSkTJxvFBAAJ

Shame on andrew, look at his red face.

LIE.

The color of my face in **not** visible here on USENET nor is the
color of my face red for those who can see me.

He is trying to pull a fast one. His scripture bit is found among these:

'14 Bible verses about Spiritual Hunger'

Such are the lies coming from the lying pens of the http://bit.ly/terribly_hungry (Genesis 25:32) commentators.

That which is "spiritual" is independent of time so that there
would've been no reference to "now."

Therefore, the LORD is referring to physical hunger here instead of
the spiritual "hunger and thirst for righteousness" elsewhere in
Scripture.

Indeed, physical hunger can **not** coexist with physical thirst
because the latter results in the loss of saliva needed for physical
hunger.

It is when we hunger for food "now" (Luke 6:21a) that we are able to
eat food "now."

No such time constraints exist for "spiritual hunger."

Moreover, the perspective of Luke 6:21a through the eyes of a
physician (i.e. Dr. Luke) would be logically expected to be physical
instead of spiritual.

All glory ( http://bit.ly/Psalm112_1 ) to GOD for His compelling you
to unwittingly demonstrate your ever worsening cognitive condition
which is tragically a consequence of His cursing (Jeremiah 17:5) you
more than ever.

Laus DEO !

+++

someone eternally condemned & ever more cursed by GOD perseverated:
(in a vain attempt to refute posts about being wonderfully hungry)

Psalms
81:10 I am the LORD thy God, which brought thee out of the land of Egypt: >open thy mouth wide, and I will fill it.

Indeed, receiving a mouthful (Psalm 81:10) of manna from GOD will only
make His http://WDJW.great-site.net/Redeemed want even more, so that
we're even http://bit.ly/wonderfully_hungrier with all glory ( http://bit.ly/Psalm112_1 ) to GOD.

Laus DEO !

Proverbs
13:25 The righteous has enough to satisfy his appetite, But the stomach of >the wicked is in need.

Indeed, the righteous know to be satisfied (Luke 6:21a) with an omer
(Exodus 16:16) of manna, while the wicked need (Proverbs 13:25) this
knowledge as evident by their eating until they are full (i.e.
satiated).

Joel
2:26 And ye shall eat in plenty, and be satisfied, and praise the name of
the LORD your God, that hath dealt wondrously with you: and my
people shall never be ashamed.

Indeed, an omer (32 ounces per Revelation 6:6) of manna is plenty
(Joel 2:26) with all glory ( http://bit.ly/Psalm112_1 ) to GOD and to
the shame of you, who are eternally (Mark 3:29) condemned.

Laus DEO ! !

Psalms
107 For he satisfies the thirsty and fills the hungry with good things.

Indeed, being filled (Psalm 107:9) with an omer (Exodus 16:16) of
manna is a Wonderful (Isaiah 9:6) thing while being satiated (i.e.
full) is evil.

Acts
14:17 "Yet he did not leave himself without witness, for he did good by >giving you rains from heaven and fruitful seasons, satisfying
your hearts with food and gladness."

In the interim, you, who are eternally (Mark 3:29) condemned, will
never be satisfied (Acts 14:17) because you are ever more cursed
(Jeremiah 17:5) by GOD.

Source: https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.med.cardiology/uCPb3ldOv5M/KgM8NFKuAQAJ

+++

someone eternally condemned & ever more cursed by GOD perseverated:

HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:

Subject: a very very very simple definition of sin ...

Source: https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.med.cardiology/mXmFD9kIocc/y8GNXircBQAJ

Does andrew's "definition" agree with scripture? Let's see in 1 John:

Actually, sin is **not** defined in 1 John 1:8-10

John wrote this to christians. The greek grammer (sic) speaks of an ongoing >> status. He includes himself in that status.

John was a Jew instead of a Greek so there is really no reason to
think that Greek grammar is relevant here.

1:8 If we say that we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, and the truth is
not in us.

1:9 If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just to forgive us our sins, >> and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness.

1:10 If we say that we have not sinned, we make him a liar, and his word is >> not in us.

John also wrote earlier at John 5:14 that LORD Jesus commands:

"Now stop sinning or something worse may happen to you." (John 5:14)

And, indeed, your being eternally condemned (Mark 3:29) & ever more
cursed (Jeremiah 17:5) by GOD, as evident by your ever worsening
cognitive deficits, is really worse.

Now again, here's how to really stop sinning as LORD Jesus commands
(John 5:14):

https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.bible.prophecy/2-Qpn-o81J4/ldGubKEZAgAJ

While wonderfully hungry ( http://bit.ly/Philippians4_12 ) in the Holy
Spirit, Who causes (Deuteronomy 8:3) me to hunger right now (Luke
6:21a), I again pray (2 Chronicles 7:14) that GOD continues to curse
(Jeremiah 17:5) you, who are eternally condemned (Mark 3:29), more
than ever in the name of Jesus Christ of Nazareth. Amen.

Laus DEO ! ! !

Again, this is done in hopes of convincing all reading this to stop
being http://bit.ly/terribly_hungry (2 Kings 6:29) where all are in
danger of becoming eternally condemned (Mark 3:29) just as had
happened to Ananias and Sapphira and more contemporaneously to Bob
Pastorio.

Again, the LORD did strike down http://bit.ly/Bob_Pastorio on Fool's
day just 9+ years ago:

http://bobs-amanuensis.livejournal.com/8728.html

Again, this is done ...

http://bit.ly/HeartDocAndrew touts hunger (Luke 6:21a) with all glory
( http://bit.ly/Psalm112_1 ) to GOD, Who causes us to hunger
(Deuteronomy 8:3) when He blesses us right now (Luke 6:21a) thereby
removing the http://WDJW.great-site.net/VAT from around the heart

...because we mindfully choose to openly care with our heart,

HeartDoc Andrew <><
--
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
Cardiologist with an http://bit.ly/EternalMedicalLicense
2024 & upwards non-partisan candidate for U.S. President: http://WonderfullyHungry.org
and author of the 2PD-OMER Approach:
http://bit.ly/HeartDocAndrewCare
which is the only **healthy** cure for the U.S. healthcare crisis

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: alt.bible.prophecy, soc.culture.usa, soc.culture.israel
XPost: talk.abortion

On Thu, 29 May 2025 16:29:05 -0700, Michael Ejercito
<MEjercit@HotMail.com> wrote:

Loose Cannon wrote:

On Thu, 29 May 2025 09:09:00 -0700, Michael Ejercito
<MEjercit@HotMail.com> wrote:

Loose Cannon wrote:

On Wed, 28 May 2025 06:27:42 -0700, Michael Ejercito
<MEjercit@HotMail.com> wrote:

https://ethicsalarms.com/2025/05/28/re-abortion-another-bias-makes-you-stupid-op-ed-in-the-nyt/

Re Abortion: Another �Bias Makes You Stupid� Op-Ed in the NYT
May 28, 2025 / Jack Marshall

<DELETE INCOHERENT APE NONSENSE>

Gooks, jews, coons and other untermensch should be encouraged to abort >>>> their fetus filth.

Why would you want that?

The world will be a better place.

No, it would not.

Check out this video about a woman talking about her first pregnancy. >>>
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pVRMB83a5uM

Here is what she wrote in the YouTube video description.

"I think I am most excited to see what my baby will look like
because of the mixed race half white (super white) half Vietnamese
anyone know any babies of this race I would love to see pictures!!!!"


Michael

That is absolutely disgusting.

No, it is not.

Yes, it positively is. In fact, it is outright revolting

How can pregnancy possibly be disgusting?

If anything , that video only enhances
my position that all sub-human life should be terminated at its
source.

Just look at a picture of this same woman with her husband and five
children.

https://www.instagram.com/p/DDs2mnZJp7G/

And here is a more recent video.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AUM66mEE6fY

How can you call any of them subhuman?

That mongoloid and the litter of shit they produced are the poster
children for the pro-abortion movement.

Michael

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: alt.bible.prophecy, soc.culture.usa, soc.culture.israel
XPost: talk.abortion

Loose Cannon wrote:

On Thu, 29 May 2025 16:29:05 -0700, Michael Ejercito
<MEjercit@HotMail.com> wrote:

Loose Cannon wrote:

On Thu, 29 May 2025 09:09:00 -0700, Michael Ejercito
<MEjercit@HotMail.com> wrote:

Check out this video about a woman talking about her first pregnancy. >>>>
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pVRMB83a5uM

Here is what she wrote in the YouTube video description.

"I think I am most excited to see what my baby will look like
because of the mixed race half white (super white) half Vietnamese
anyone know any babies of this race I would love to see pictures!!!!"


Michael

That is absolutely disgusting.

No, it is not.

Yes, it positively is. In fact, it is outright revolting

There is nothing revolting about pregnancy.

How can pregnancy possibly be disgusting?

If anything , that video only enhances
my position that all sub-human life should be terminated at its
source.

Just look at a picture of this same woman with her husband and five
children.

https://www.instagram.com/p/DDs2mnZJp7G/

And here is a more recent video.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AUM66mEE6fY

How can you call any of them subhuman?

That mongoloid and the litter of shit they produced are the poster
children for the pro-abortion movement.

To the contrary, they are a shining example of heterosexuality!

https://www.tiktok.com/@kerenswann/video/6897277679213612294


Michael

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: alt.bible.prophecy, soc.culture.usa, soc.culture.israel
XPost: talk.abortion, alt.christnet.christianlife

(Kimberly) 05/31/25 Again praying w/ MichaelE here ...

https://narkive.com/VkiRiBmZ.6

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: alt.bible.prophecy, soc.culture.usa, soc.culture.israel
XPost: talk.abortion

On Fri, 30 May 2025 18:09:15 -0700, Michael Ejercito
<MEjercit@HotMail.com> wrote:

Loose Cannon wrote:

On Thu, 29 May 2025 16:29:05 -0700, Michael Ejercito
<MEjercit@HotMail.com> wrote:

Loose Cannon wrote:

On Thu, 29 May 2025 09:09:00 -0700, Michael Ejercito
<MEjercit@HotMail.com> wrote:

Check out this video about a woman talking about her first pregnancy.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pVRMB83a5uM

Here is what she wrote in the YouTube video description.

"I think I am most excited to see what my baby will look like
because of the mixed race half white (super white) half Vietnamese
anyone know any babies of this race I would love to see pictures!!!!" >>>>>

Michael

That is absolutely disgusting.

No, it is not.

Yes, it positively is. In fact, it is outright revolting

There is nothing revolting about pregnancy.

It is when it's the result of bestial intercourse

How can pregnancy possibly be disgusting?

If anything , that video only enhances
my position that all sub-human life should be terminated at its
source.

Just look at a picture of this same woman with her husband and five
children.

https://www.instagram.com/p/DDs2mnZJp7G/

And here is a more recent video.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AUM66mEE6fY

How can you call any of them subhuman?

That mongoloid and the litter of shit they produced are the poster
children for the pro-abortion movement.

To the contrary, they are a shining example of heterosexuality!

https://www.tiktok.com/@kerenswann/video/6897277679213612294

Michael

If this were the good old days of the South, they'd have lynched those
two pieces of shit. That White trash has disgraced herself, her
family, her friends and her community

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: alt.bible.prophecy, soc.culture.usa, soc.culture.israel
XPost: talk.abortion, alt.christnet.christianlife

<Kimberly> 06/01/25 Loose/KK tragically vainjangling (1 Tim 1:6) ...

https://groups.google.com/g/sci.med.cardiology/c/4tIJn_I167w/m/bKWQRUarAgAJ

Link to post explicating vainjangling by the eternally condemned: https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.med.cardiology/O23NguTslhI/-xLGqnNjAAAJ

"Like a moth to flame, the eternally condemned tragically return to be
ever more cursed by GOD."

Behold in wide-eyed wonder and amazement at the continued fulfillment
of this prophecy as clearly demonstrated within the following USENET
threads:

(1) Link to thread titled "LORD Jesus Christ of Nazareth is our #1
Example of being wonderfully hungry;"

https://groups.google.com/g/sci.med.cardiology/c/_iVmOb7q3_Q/m/E8L7TNNtAgAJ

(2) Link to thread titled "Being wonderfully hungry;"

https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/sci.med.cardiology/uCPb3ldOv5M

(3) Link to thread titled "A very very very simple definition of sin;"

https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/alt.bible.prophecy/xunFWhan_AM

(4) Link to thread titled "The LORD says 'Blessed are you who hunger
now;'"

https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/alt.bible.prophecy/e4sW8dr44rM

(5) Link to thread titled "Being wonderfully hungry like LORD Jesus;"

https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.bible.prophecy/xPY1Uzl-ZNk/QeKLDNCpCwAJ

... for the continued benefit (Romans 8:28) of those of us who are http://WonderfullyHungry.org like GOD ( http://bit.ly/Lk2442 ) with
all glory ( http://bit.ly/Psalm112_1 ) to the LORD.

Source: https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.med.cardiology/O23NguTslhI/pIZcsOCJBwAJ

Laus DEO !

While wonderfully hungry ( http://bit.ly/Philippians4_12 ) in the Holy
Spirit, Who causes (Deuteronomy 8:3) me to hunger right now (Luke
6:21a), I pray (2 Chronicles 7:14) that GOD continues to curse
(Jeremiah 17:5) you, who are eternally condemned (Mark 3:29), more
than ever in the name of Jesus Christ of Nazareth. Amen.

Laus DEO ! ! !

Bottom line: https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.med.cardiology/O23NguTslhI/h5lE-mr0DAAJ

<begin trichotomy>

(1) Born-again (John 3:3 & 5) humans - Folks who have GOD's Help (i.e.
Holy Spirit) to stop (John 5:14) sinning by being
http://WonderfullyHungry.org (Philippians 4:12) **but** are still
able to choose via their own "free will" to be instead http://bit.ly/terribly_hungry (Genesis 25:32) trapped in the
entangling (Hebrews 12:1) deadly (i.e. killed immortals Adam&Eve) sin
of gluttony (Proverbs 23:2).

(2) Eternally condemned (Mark 3:29) humans - Folks who will never have
GOD's Help (i.e. Holy Spirit) to stop being
http://bit.ly/terribly_hungry (2 Kings 6:29) as evident by their
constant vainjangling (1 Timothy 1:6) about everything except how to
stop (John 5:14) sinning.

(3) Perishing humans - The remaining folks who may possibly (Matthew
19:26) become born-again (John 3:3 & 5) as new (2 Corinthians 5:17)
creatures in Christ.

<end trichotomy>

Suggested further reading:
http://T3WiJ.com

+++

someone eternally condemned & ever more cursed by GOD wrote:

HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:

Subject: The LORD says "Blessed are you who hunger now ..."

Source: https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.bible.prophecy/e4sW8dr44rM/NSkTJxvFBAAJ

Shame on andrew, look at his red face.

LIE.

The color of my face in **not** visible here on USENET nor is the
color of my face red for those who can see me.

He is trying to pull a fast one. His scripture bit is found among these:

'14 Bible verses about Spiritual Hunger'

Such are the lies coming from the lying pens of the http://bit.ly/terribly_hungry (Genesis 25:32) commentators.

That which is "spiritual" is independent of time so that there
would've been no reference to "now."

Therefore, the LORD is referring to physical hunger here instead of
the spiritual "hunger and thirst for righteousness" elsewhere in
Scripture.

Indeed, physical hunger can **not** coexist with physical thirst
because the latter results in the loss of saliva needed for physical
hunger.

It is when we hunger for food "now" (Luke 6:21a) that we are able to
eat food "now."

No such time constraints exist for "spiritual hunger."

Moreover, the perspective of Luke 6:21a through the eyes of a
physician (i.e. Dr. Luke) would be logically expected to be physical
instead of spiritual.

All glory ( http://bit.ly/Psalm112_1 ) to GOD for His compelling you
to unwittingly demonstrate your ever worsening cognitive condition
which is tragically a consequence of His cursing (Jeremiah 17:5) you
more than ever.

Laus DEO !

+++

someone eternally condemned & ever more cursed by GOD perseverated:
(in a vain attempt to refute posts about being wonderfully hungry)

Psalms
81:10 I am the LORD thy God, which brought thee out of the land of Egypt: >open thy mouth wide, and I will fill it.

Indeed, receiving a mouthful (Psalm 81:10) of manna from GOD will only
make His http://WDJW.great-site.net/Redeemed want even more, so that
we're even http://bit.ly/wonderfully_hungrier with all glory ( http://bit.ly/Psalm112_1 ) to GOD.

Laus DEO !

Proverbs
13:25 The righteous has enough to satisfy his appetite, But the stomach of >the wicked is in need.

Indeed, the righteous know to be satisfied (Luke 6:21a) with an omer
(Exodus 16:16) of manna, while the wicked need (Proverbs 13:25) this
knowledge as evident by their eating until they are full (i.e.
satiated).

Joel
2:26 And ye shall eat in plenty, and be satisfied, and praise the name of
the LORD your God, that hath dealt wondrously with you: and my
people shall never be ashamed.

Indeed, an omer (32 ounces per Revelation 6:6) of manna is plenty
(Joel 2:26) with all glory ( http://bit.ly/Psalm112_1 ) to GOD and to
the shame of you, who are eternally (Mark 3:29) condemned.

Laus DEO ! !

Psalms
107 For he satisfies the thirsty and fills the hungry with good things.

Indeed, being filled (Psalm 107:9) with an omer (Exodus 16:16) of
manna is a Wonderful (Isaiah 9:6) thing while being satiated (i.e.
full) is evil.

Acts
14:17 "Yet he did not leave himself without witness, for he did good by >giving you rains from heaven and fruitful seasons, satisfying
your hearts with food and gladness."

In the interim, you, who are eternally (Mark 3:29) condemned, will
never be satisfied (Acts 14:17) because you are ever more cursed
(Jeremiah 17:5) by GOD.

Source: https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.med.cardiology/uCPb3ldOv5M/KgM8NFKuAQAJ

+++

someone eternally condemned & ever more cursed by GOD perseverated:

HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:

Subject: a very very very simple definition of sin ...

Source: https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.med.cardiology/mXmFD9kIocc/y8GNXircBQAJ

Does andrew's "definition" agree with scripture? Let's see in 1 John:

Actually, sin is **not** defined in 1 John 1:8-10

John wrote this to christians. The greek grammer (sic) speaks of an ongoing >> status. He includes himself in that status.

John was a Jew instead of a Greek so there is really no reason to
think that Greek grammar is relevant here.

1:8 If we say that we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, and the truth is
not in us.

1:9 If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just to forgive us our sins, >> and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness.

1:10 If we say that we have not sinned, we make him a liar, and his word is >> not in us.

John also wrote earlier at John 5:14 that LORD Jesus commands:

"Now stop sinning or something worse may happen to you." (John 5:14)

And, indeed, your being eternally condemned (Mark 3:29) & ever more
cursed (Jeremiah 17:5) by GOD, as evident by your ever worsening
cognitive deficits, is really worse.

Now again, here's how to really stop sinning as LORD Jesus commands
(John 5:14):

https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.bible.prophecy/2-Qpn-o81J4/ldGubKEZAgAJ

While wonderfully hungry ( http://bit.ly/Philippians4_12 ) in the Holy
Spirit, Who causes (Deuteronomy 8:3) me to hunger right now (Luke
6:21a), I again pray (2 Chronicles 7:14) that GOD continues to curse
(Jeremiah 17:5) you, who are eternally condemned (Mark 3:29), more
than ever in the name of Jesus Christ of Nazareth. Amen.

Laus DEO ! ! !

Again, this is done in hopes of convincing all reading this to stop
being http://bit.ly/terribly_hungry (2 Kings 6:29) where all are in
danger of becoming eternally condemned (Mark 3:29) just as had
happened to Ananias and Sapphira and more contemporaneously to Bob
Pastorio.

Again, the LORD did strike down http://bit.ly/Bob_Pastorio on Fool's
day just 9+ years ago:

http://bobs-amanuensis.livejournal.com/8728.html

Again, this is done ...

http://bit.ly/HeartDocAndrew touts hunger (Luke 6:21a) with all glory
( http://bit.ly/Psalm112_1 ) to GOD, Who causes us to hunger
(Deuteronomy 8:3) when He blesses us right now (Luke 6:21a) thereby
removing the http://WDJW.great-site.net/VAT from around the heart

...because we mindfully choose to openly care with our heart,

HeartDoc Andrew <><
--
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
Cardiologist with an http://bit.ly/EternalMedicalLicense
2024 & upwards non-partisan candidate for U.S. President: http://WonderfullyHungry.org
and author of the 2PD-OMER Approach:
http://bit.ly/HeartDocAndrewCare
which is the only **healthy** cure for the U.S. healthcare crisis

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: alt.bible.prophecy, soc.culture.usa, soc.culture.israel
XPost: talk.abortion

Loose Cannon wrote:

On Fri, 30 May 2025 18:09:15 -0700, Michael Ejercito
<MEjercit@HotMail.com> wrote:

Loose Cannon wrote:

On Thu, 29 May 2025 16:29:05 -0700, Michael Ejercito
<MEjercit@HotMail.com> wrote:

Just look at a picture of this same woman with her husband and five >>>> children.

https://www.instagram.com/p/DDs2mnZJp7G/

And here is a more recent video.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AUM66mEE6fY

How can you call any of them subhuman?

That mongoloid and the litter of shit they produced are the poster
children for the pro-abortion movement.

To the contrary, they are a shining example of heterosexuality!

https://www.tiktok.com/@kerenswann/video/6897277679213612294


Michael

If this were the good old days of the South, they'd have lynched those
two pieces of shit.

That would have been immoral.

That White trash has disgraced herself, her
family, her friends and her community

To the contrary, being married and having a family are
accomplishments that her family, friends, and community can be proud of!


Michael

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: alt.bible.prophecy, soc.culture.usa, soc.culture.israel
XPost: talk.abortion, alt.christnet.christianlife

(Kimberly) 06/02/25 Again praying w/ MichaelE here ...

https://narkive.com/VkiRiBmZ.6

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: alt.bible.prophecy, soc.culture.usa, soc.culture.israel
XPost: talk.abortion

On Mon, 2 Jun 2025 07:38:24 -0700, Michael Ejercito
<MEjercit@HotMail.com> wrote:

Loose Cannon wrote:

On Fri, 30 May 2025 18:09:15 -0700, Michael Ejercito
<MEjercit@HotMail.com> wrote:

Loose Cannon wrote:

On Thu, 29 May 2025 16:29:05 -0700, Michael Ejercito
<MEjercit@HotMail.com> wrote:

Just look at a picture of this same woman with her husband and five >>>>> children.

https://www.instagram.com/p/DDs2mnZJp7G/

And here is a more recent video.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AUM66mEE6fY

How can you call any of them subhuman?

That mongoloid and the litter of shit they produced are the poster
children for the pro-abortion movement.

To the contrary, they are a shining example of heterosexuality!

https://www.tiktok.com/@kerenswann/video/6897277679213612294


Michael

If this were the good old days of the South, they'd have lynched those
two pieces of shit.

That would have been immoral.

That would have been a mitzvah

That White trash has disgraced herself, her
family, her friends and her community

To the contrary, being married and having a family are
accomplishments that her family, friends, and community can be proud of!

No family, freind or community would ever be proud of one of their own
engaging in bestiality.

Michael

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: alt.bible.prophecy, soc.culture.usa, soc.culture.israel
XPost: talk.abortion

<Kimberly> 06/02/25 Loose/KK tragically vainjangling (1 Tim 1:6) ...

https://groups.google.com/g/sci.med.cardiology/c/4tIJn_I167w/m/bKWQRUarAgAJ

Link to post explicating vainjangling by the eternally condemned: https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.med.cardiology/O23NguTslhI/-xLGqnNjAAAJ

"Like a moth to flame, the eternally condemned tragically return to be
ever more cursed by GOD."

Behold in wide-eyed wonder and amazement at the continued fulfillment
of this prophecy as clearly demonstrated within the following USENET
threads:

(1) Link to thread titled "LORD Jesus Christ of Nazareth is our #1
Example of being wonderfully hungry;"

https://groups.google.com/g/sci.med.cardiology/c/_iVmOb7q3_Q/m/E8L7TNNtAgAJ

(2) Link to thread titled "Being wonderfully hungry;"

https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/sci.med.cardiology/uCPb3ldOv5M

(3) Link to thread titled "A very very very simple definition of sin;"

https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/alt.bible.prophecy/xunFWhan_AM

(4) Link to thread titled "The LORD says 'Blessed are you who hunger
now;'"

https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/alt.bible.prophecy/e4sW8dr44rM

(5) Link to thread titled "Being wonderfully hungry like LORD Jesus;"

https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.bible.prophecy/xPY1Uzl-ZNk/QeKLDNCpCwAJ

... for the continued benefit (Romans 8:28) of those of us who are http://WonderfullyHungry.org like GOD ( http://bit.ly/Lk2442 ) with
all glory ( http://bit.ly/Psalm112_1 ) to the LORD.

Source: https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.med.cardiology/O23NguTslhI/pIZcsOCJBwAJ

Laus DEO !

While wonderfully hungry ( http://bit.ly/Philippians4_12 ) in the Holy
Spirit, Who causes (Deuteronomy 8:3) me to hunger right now (Luke
6:21a), I pray (2 Chronicles 7:14) that GOD continues to curse
(Jeremiah 17:5) you, who are eternally condemned (Mark 3:29), more
than ever in the name of Jesus Christ of Nazareth. Amen.

Laus DEO ! ! !

Bottom line: https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.med.cardiology/O23NguTslhI/h5lE-mr0DAAJ

<begin trichotomy>

(1) Born-again (John 3:3 & 5) humans - Folks who have GOD's Help (i.e.
Holy Spirit) to stop (John 5:14) sinning by being
http://WonderfullyHungry.org (Philippians 4:12) **but** are still
able to choose via their own "free will" to be instead http://bit.ly/terribly_hungry (Genesis 25:32) trapped in the
entangling (Hebrews 12:1) deadly (i.e. killed immortals Adam&Eve) sin
of gluttony (Proverbs 23:2).

(2) Eternally condemned (Mark 3:29) humans - Folks who will never have
GOD's Help (i.e. Holy Spirit) to stop being
http://bit.ly/terribly_hungry (2 Kings 6:29) as evident by their
constant vainjangling (1 Timothy 1:6) about everything except how to
stop (John 5:14) sinning.

(3) Perishing humans - The remaining folks who may possibly (Matthew
19:26) become born-again (John 3:3 & 5) as new (2 Corinthians 5:17)
creatures in Christ.

<end trichotomy>

Suggested further reading:
http://T3WiJ.com

+++

someone eternally condemned & ever more cursed by GOD wrote:

HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:

Subject: The LORD says "Blessed are you who hunger now ..."

Source: https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.bible.prophecy/e4sW8dr44rM/NSkTJxvFBAAJ

Shame on andrew, look at his red face.

LIE.

The color of my face in **not** visible here on USENET nor is the
color of my face red for those who can see me.

He is trying to pull a fast one. His scripture bit is found among these:

'14 Bible verses about Spiritual Hunger'

Such are the lies coming from the lying pens of the http://bit.ly/terribly_hungry (Genesis 25:32) commentators.

That which is "spiritual" is independent of time so that there
would've been no reference to "now."

Therefore, the LORD is referring to physical hunger here instead of
the spiritual "hunger and thirst for righteousness" elsewhere in
Scripture.

Indeed, physical hunger can **not** coexist with physical thirst
because the latter results in the loss of saliva needed for physical
hunger.

It is when we hunger for food "now" (Luke 6:21a) that we are able to
eat food "now."

No such time constraints exist for "spiritual hunger."

Moreover, the perspective of Luke 6:21a through the eyes of a
physician (i.e. Dr. Luke) would be logically expected to be physical
instead of spiritual.

All glory ( http://bit.ly/Psalm112_1 ) to GOD for His compelling you
to unwittingly demonstrate your ever worsening cognitive condition
which is tragically a consequence of His cursing (Jeremiah 17:5) you
more than ever.

Laus DEO !

+++

someone eternally condemned & ever more cursed by GOD perseverated:
(in a vain attempt to refute posts about being wonderfully hungry)

Psalms
81:10 I am the LORD thy God, which brought thee out of the land of Egypt: >open thy mouth wide, and I will fill it.

Indeed, receiving a mouthful (Psalm 81:10) of manna from GOD will only
make His http://WDJW.great-site.net/Redeemed want even more, so that
we're even http://bit.ly/wonderfully_hungrier with all glory ( http://bit.ly/Psalm112_1 ) to GOD.

Laus DEO !

Proverbs
13:25 The righteous has enough to satisfy his appetite, But the stomach of >the wicked is in need.

Indeed, the righteous know to be satisfied (Luke 6:21a) with an omer
(Exodus 16:16) of manna, while the wicked need (Proverbs 13:25) this
knowledge as evident by their eating until they are full (i.e.
satiated).

Joel
2:26 And ye shall eat in plenty, and be satisfied, and praise the name of
the LORD your God, that hath dealt wondrously with you: and my
people shall never be ashamed.

Indeed, an omer (32 ounces per Revelation 6:6) of manna is plenty
(Joel 2:26) with all glory ( http://bit.ly/Psalm112_1 ) to GOD and to
the shame of you, who are eternally (Mark 3:29) condemned.

Laus DEO ! !

Psalms
107 For he satisfies the thirsty and fills the hungry with good things.

Indeed, being filled (Psalm 107:9) with an omer (Exodus 16:16) of
manna is a Wonderful (Isaiah 9:6) thing while being satiated (i.e.
full) is evil.

Acts
14:17 "Yet he did not leave himself without witness, for he did good by >giving you rains from heaven and fruitful seasons, satisfying
your hearts with food and gladness."

In the interim, you, who are eternally (Mark 3:29) condemned, will
never be satisfied (Acts 14:17) because you are ever more cursed
(Jeremiah 17:5) by GOD.

Source: https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.med.cardiology/uCPb3ldOv5M/KgM8NFKuAQAJ

+++

someone eternally condemned & ever more cursed by GOD perseverated:

HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:

Subject: a very very very simple definition of sin ...

Source: https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.med.cardiology/mXmFD9kIocc/y8GNXircBQAJ

Does andrew's "definition" agree with scripture? Let's see in 1 John:

Actually, sin is **not** defined in 1 John 1:8-10

John wrote this to christians. The greek grammer (sic) speaks of an ongoing >> status. He includes himself in that status.

John was a Jew instead of a Greek so there is really no reason to
think that Greek grammar is relevant here.

1:8 If we say that we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, and the truth is
not in us.

1:9 If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just to forgive us our sins, >> and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness.

1:10 If we say that we have not sinned, we make him a liar, and his word is >> not in us.

John also wrote earlier at John 5:14 that LORD Jesus commands:

"Now stop sinning or something worse may happen to you." (John 5:14)

And, indeed, your being eternally condemned (Mark 3:29) & ever more
cursed (Jeremiah 17:5) by GOD, as evident by your ever worsening
cognitive deficits, is really worse.

Now again, here's how to really stop sinning as LORD Jesus commands
(John 5:14):

https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.bible.prophecy/2-Qpn-o81J4/ldGubKEZAgAJ

While wonderfully hungry ( http://bit.ly/Philippians4_12 ) in the Holy
Spirit, Who causes (Deuteronomy 8:3) me to hunger right now (Luke
6:21a), I again pray (2 Chronicles 7:14) that GOD continues to curse
(Jeremiah 17:5) you, who are eternally condemned (Mark 3:29), more
than ever in the name of Jesus Christ of Nazareth. Amen.

Laus DEO ! ! !

Again, this is done in hopes of convincing all reading this to stop
being http://bit.ly/terribly_hungry (2 Kings 6:29) where all are in
danger of becoming eternally condemned (Mark 3:29) just as had
happened to Ananias and Sapphira and more contemporaneously to Bob
Pastorio.

Again, the LORD did strike down http://bit.ly/Bob_Pastorio on Fool's
day just 9+ years ago:

http://bobs-amanuensis.livejournal.com/8728.html

Again, this is done ...

http://bit.ly/HeartDocAndrew touts hunger (Luke 6:21a) with all glory
( http://bit.ly/Psalm112_1 ) to GOD, Who causes us to hunger
(Deuteronomy 8:3) when He blesses us right now (Luke 6:21a) thereby
removing the http://WDJW.great-site.net/VAT from around the heart

...because we mindfully choose to openly care with our heart,

HeartDoc Andrew <><
--
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
Cardiologist with an http://bit.ly/EternalMedicalLicense
2024 & upwards non-partisan candidate for U.S. President: http://WonderfullyHungry.org
and author of the 2PD-OMER Approach:
http://bit.ly/HeartDocAndrewCare
which is the only **healthy** cure for the U.S. healthcare crisis

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: alt.bible.prophecy, soc.culture.usa, soc.culture.israel
XPost: talk.abortion

Loose Cannon wrote:

On Mon, 2 Jun 2025 07:38:24 -0700, Michael Ejercito
<MEjercit@HotMail.com> wrote:

Loose Cannon wrote:

On Fri, 30 May 2025 18:09:15 -0700, Michael Ejercito
<MEjercit@HotMail.com> wrote:

To the contrary, they are a shining example of heterosexuality!

https://www.tiktok.com/@kerenswann/video/6897277679213612294


Michael

If this were the good old days of the South, they'd have lynched those
two pieces of shit.

That would have been immoral.

That would have been a mitzvah

Wrong!

That White trash has disgraced herself, her
family, her friends and her community

To the contrary, being married and having a family are
accomplishments that her family, friends, and community can be proud of!

No family, freind or community would ever be proud of one of their own engaging in bestiality.

There is no bestiality.

There is heterosexuality and matrimony, and there was pregnancy.

Again, read the caption.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pVRMB83a5uM&t=1s


"I think I am most excited to see what my baby will look like
because of the mixed race half white (super white) half Vietnamese
anyone know any babies of this race I would love to see pictures!!!!"

How can anyone hate this video?


Michael

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)