https://www.foxnews.com/world/us-send-b-52-bombers-australia-move-china-warns-could-trigger-arms-race
US to send B-52 bombers to Australia in move China warns could
'trigger' arms race
US defense official says sending B-52 bombers to Australia part
of long-standing alliance
Royal Australian Air Force Base (RAAF) Tindal has long been home
to U.S. B-52 bombers, but China’s foreign ministry took issue
with U.S. plans to send up to six nuclear-capable B-52 bombers
to the base in northern Australia, according to reports Monday.
Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Zhao Lijian said the U.S.
plans to increase its security alliance with Sydney "escalates
regional tensions"
. . .
Um ... I think the only diff of "nuclear-capable" is to
swap out the bomb rack. Actually, most nukes are now
probably smaller than 1000-lb conventional bombs ...
unlike in the 50s when they were *huge* things.
Oh, and a B-52 is likely the WORST way to try and
deliver nuclear weapons these days. They're big
and relatively slow and show up real good on radar.
That's why we built B-2s and B1-B's and cruise
missiles and ICBMs and such.
But it's all appearances and politics.
And it's probably good to give Xi a *little* shit
after his ascension to commie godhood ....
On 11/1/2022 9:17 PM, 26C.Z968 wrote:
https://www.foxnews.com/world/us-send-b-52-bombers-australia-move-china-warns-could-trigger-arms-race
US to send B-52 bombers to Australia in move China warns could
'trigger' arms race
US defense official says sending B-52 bombers to Australia part
of long-standing alliance
Royal Australian Air Force Base (RAAF) Tindal has long been home
to U.S. B-52 bombers, but China’s foreign ministry took issue
with U.S. plans to send up to six nuclear-capable B-52 bombers
to the base in northern Australia, according to reports Monday.
Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Zhao Lijian said the U.S.
plans to increase its security alliance with Sydney "escalates
regional tensions"
. . .
Um ... I think the only diff of "nuclear-capable" is to
swap out the bomb rack. Actually, most nukes are now
probably smaller than 1000-lb conventional bombs ...
unlike in the 50s when they were *huge* things.
Oh, and a B-52 is likely the WORST way to try and
deliver nuclear weapons these days. They're big
and relatively slow and show up real good on radar.
That's why we built B-2s and B1-B's and cruise
missiles and ICBMs and such.
But it's all appearances and politics.
And it's probably good to give Xi a *little* shit
after his ascension to commie godhood ....
Prior to WWI Australia and Japan had a mutual defense pact against the constant attempts by China to invade both.
Our Moron President Wilson demanded that they disband that treaty as
it interfered with his plans for a "League of Nations". Japan had been
our ally until then. Their only defense was to invade Korea, Mongolia,
and China to beat China to the punch. That is just another of the many reasons WWII came about.
Thank the Fucking Democrats for another unnecessary war. We should
have hanged Wilson! I see Biden just nixed a 4 star General that was
very competent and install another Brain dead Deadbeat Democrat. Even
had to make this one a General in order to fill the Job. China can't
beat us, but that SOB in the WhiteHouse probably will. Destruction of America Armed forces from within.
On 11/1/2022 9:17 PM, 26C.Z968 wrote:
https://www.foxnews.com/world/us-send-b-52-bombers-australia-move-china-warns-could-trigger-arms-race
US to send B-52 bombers to Australia in move China warns could
'trigger' arms race
US defense official says sending B-52 bombers to Australia part
of long-standing alliance
Royal Australian Air Force Base (RAAF) Tindal has long been home
to U.S. B-52 bombers, but China’s foreign ministry took issue
with U.S. plans to send up to six nuclear-capable B-52 bombers
to the base in northern Australia, according to reports Monday.
Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Zhao Lijian said the U.S.
plans to increase its security alliance with Sydney "escalates
regional tensions"
. . .
Um ... I think the only diff of "nuclear-capable" is to
swap out the bomb rack. Actually, most nukes are now
probably smaller than 1000-lb conventional bombs ...
unlike in the 50s when they were *huge* things.
Oh, and a B-52 is likely the WORST way to try and
deliver nuclear weapons these days. They're big
and relatively slow and show up real good on radar.
That's why we built B-2s and B1-B's and cruise
missiles and ICBMs and such.
But it's all appearances and politics.
And it's probably good to give Xi a *little* shit
after his ascension to commie godhood ....
Prior to WWI Australia and Japan had a mutual defense pact against the constant attempts by China to invade both. Our Moron President Wilson demanded that they disband that treaty as it interfered with his plans
for a "League of Nations". Japan had been our ally until then. Their
only defense was to invade Korea, Mongolia, and China to beat China to
the punch.
That is just another of the many reasons WWII came about.
Thank the Fucking Democrats for another unnecessary war. We should have hanged Wilson! I see Biden just nixed a 4 star General that was very competent and install another Brain dead Deadbeat Democrat. Even had to
make this one a General in order to fill the Job. China can't beat us,
but that SOB in the WhiteHouse probably will. Destruction of America
Armed forces from within.
Vincent wrote on 11/2/2022 1:52 AM:
On 11/1/2022 9:17 PM, 26C.Z968 wrote:
https://www.foxnews.com/world/us-send-b-52-bombers-australia-move-china-warns-could-trigger-arms-race
US to send B-52 bombers to Australia in move China warns could
'trigger' arms race
US defense official says sending B-52 bombers to Australia part
of long-standing alliance
Royal Australian Air Force Base (RAAF) Tindal has long been home
to U.S. B-52 bombers, but China’s foreign ministry took issue
with U.S. plans to send up to six nuclear-capable B-52 bombers
to the base in northern Australia, according to reports Monday.
Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Zhao Lijian said the U.S.
plans to increase its security alliance with Sydney "escalates
regional tensions"
. . .
Um ... I think the only diff of "nuclear-capable" is to
swap out the bomb rack. Actually, most nukes are now
probably smaller than 1000-lb conventional bombs ...
unlike in the 50s when they were *huge* things.
Oh, and a B-52 is likely the WORST way to try and
deliver nuclear weapons these days. They're big
and relatively slow and show up real good on radar.
That's why we built B-2s and B1-B's and cruise
missiles and ICBMs and such.
But it's all appearances and politics.
And it's probably good to give Xi a *little* shit
after his ascension to commie godhood ....
Prior to WWI Australia and Japan had a mutual defense pact against the
constant attempts by China to invade both.
Where did you get this nonsense? I have watched a lot of WWI
documentaries on YouTube. Japan and all European powers had colonies and "concessions" in China. (That's what drove China into a communist
republic after WWII, which came 20 years after the end of WWI). Germany
had the colony "Tsing Tao" in northeast China as a "coaling station" (battleships burn a lot of coal each mile at sea). Great Britain allied
with Japan to take Tsing Tao to starve German fleet of fuel in the
Pacific theatre.
On 11/2/22 1:52 AM, Vincent wrote:
On 11/1/2022 9:17 PM, 26C.Z968 wrote:
https://www.foxnews.com/world/us-send-b-52-bombers-australia-move-china-warns-could-trigger-arms-race
US to send B-52 bombers to Australia in move China warns could
'trigger' arms race
US defense official says sending B-52 bombers to Australia part
of long-standing alliance
Royal Australian Air Force Base (RAAF) Tindal has long been home
to U.S. B-52 bombers, but China’s foreign ministry took issue
with U.S. plans to send up to six nuclear-capable B-52 bombers
to the base in northern Australia, according to reports Monday.
Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Zhao Lijian said the U.S.
plans to increase its security alliance with Sydney "escalates
regional tensions"
. . .
Um ... I think the only diff of "nuclear-capable" is to
swap out the bomb rack. Actually, most nukes are now
probably smaller than 1000-lb conventional bombs ...
unlike in the 50s when they were *huge* things.
Oh, and a B-52 is likely the WORST way to try and
deliver nuclear weapons these days. They're big
and relatively slow and show up real good on radar.
That's why we built B-2s and B1-B's and cruise
missiles and ICBMs and such.
But it's all appearances and politics.
And it's probably good to give Xi a *little* shit
after his ascension to commie godhood ....
Prior to WWI Australia and Japan had a mutual defense pact against the
constant attempts by China to invade both. Our Moron President Wilson
demanded that they disband that treaty as it interfered with his plans
for a "League of Nations". Japan had been our ally until then. Their
only defense was to invade Korea, Mongolia, and China to beat China to
the punch.
The horse-shit is getting pretty deep here .....
China was in NO position to invade anybody, it was
still almost entirely agrarian and its mil-tech was
barely past medieval.
That is just another of the many reasons WWII came about. Thank the
Fucking Democrats for another unnecessary war. We should have hanged
Wilson! I see Biden just nixed a 4 star General that was very
competent and install another Brain dead Deadbeat Democrat. Even had
to make this one a General in order to fill the Job. China can't beat
us, but that SOB in the WhiteHouse probably will. Destruction of
America Armed forces from within.
"China can't beat us" ??? It can fry us REALLY damned bad
and a lot of its mil-tech is now well head of the West's.
Now "beat" ... depends on your meaning. We can fry 'em
real good too. No winners, so nobody gets "beat" per-se.
Maybe you didn't notice those "and also" news stories over
the past couple of years - like China basically tripling
its number of ICBM silos for one.
biz dealings bought ? They also have trans-orbital "hyper-
sonics"
not even notice them until it's WAY too late. Then their
gen-II AI autonomous micro-subs/torpedoes and gigantic
army and .......
China is EXTREMELY dangerous - it just doesn't bang shoes
on the table and scream about it.
On 11/2/2022 7:34 PM, 26C.Z968 wrote:
On 11/2/22 1:52 AM, Vincent wrote:
On 11/1/2022 9:17 PM, 26C.Z968 wrote:
https://www.foxnews.com/world/us-send-b-52-bombers-australia-move-china-warns-could-trigger-arms-race
As for the Arms race..It has started.and a while back.
Huge arms contracts have been let to the top 5 contractors ...Close to a $Trillion Dollars with top contender Lockheed Martin and number 5
General Dynamics. Being is in the mix.
US to send B-52 bombers to Australia in move China warns could
'trigger' arms race
US defense official says sending B-52 bombers to Australia part
of long-standing alliance
Royal Australian Air Force Base (RAAF) Tindal has long been home
to U.S. B-52 bombers, but China’s foreign ministry took issue
with U.S. plans to send up to six nuclear-capable B-52 bombers
to the base in northern Australia, according to reports Monday.
Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Zhao Lijian said the U.S.
plans to increase its security alliance with Sydney "escalates
regional tensions"
. . .
Um ... I think the only diff of "nuclear-capable" is to
swap out the bomb rack. Actually, most nukes are now
probably smaller than 1000-lb conventional bombs ...
unlike in the 50s when they were *huge* things.
Oh, and a B-52 is likely the WORST way to try and
deliver nuclear weapons these days. They're big
and relatively slow and show up real good on radar.
That's why we built B-2s and B1-B's and cruise
missiles and ICBMs and such.
But it's all appearances and politics.
And it's probably good to give Xi a *little* shit
after his ascension to commie godhood ....
Prior to WWI Australia and Japan had a mutual defense pact against the
constant attempts by China to invade both. Our Moron President Wilson
demanded that they disband that treaty as it interfered with his
plans for a "League of Nations". Japan had been our ally until then.
Their only defense was to invade Korea, Mongolia, and China to beat
China to the punch.
The horse-shit is getting pretty deep here .....
Fuck you!
China was in NO position to invade anybody, it was
still almost entirely agrarian and its mil-tech was
barely past medieval.
Uh Huh... The Boxer Rebellion, American patrols to back up the British
drug trade during the 1800's up to the WW's A whole encyclopedia of wars
in that region of the world. Go visit a library. Or better yet...Do some
ass in the Grass jobs with the Marines or what ever.
That is just another of the many reasons WWII came about. Thank the
Fucking Democrats for another unnecessary war. We should have hanged
Wilson! I see Biden just nixed a 4 star General that was very
competent and install another Brain dead Deadbeat Democrat. Even had
to make this one a General in order to fill the Job. China can't beat
us, but that SOB in the WhiteHouse probably will. Destruction of
America Armed forces from within.
"China can't beat us" ??? It can fry us REALLY damned bad
and a lot of its mil-tech is now well head of the West's.
Now "beat" ... depends on your meaning. We can fry 'em
real good too. No winners, so nobody gets "beat" per-se.
That's a given.... China cannot beat us! Can do a lot of damage though.
But that is it. As for a win. Your damned betcha we can. But whats left
won't be worth owning.
Maybe you didn't notice those "and also" news stories over
the past couple of years - like China basically tripling
its number of ICBM silos for one.
Do you really believe China is Suicidal?(Sarcasm)
I wonder how many Hunter's
biz dealings bought ? They also have trans-orbital "hyper-
sonics"
Do you even have any idea what ALL of the Western countries would/could counter with?
now that there's really no defense against, might
not even notice them until it's WAY too late. Then their
gen-II AI autonomous micro-subs/torpedoes and gigantic
army and .......
I have also noted our weapons research for a long time. When you become
a top military advisor for our Democratic-Republic, then and only then
will I possibly add you to the information stream about what we can or
cannot do. China at the present time cannot even solve its water shortage.
China is EXTREMELY dangerous - it just doesn't bang shoes
on the table and scream about it.
Actually China for the last 80 years has played its cards very close to
the chest. Maybe you should start your History of China when they owned Vietnam, Cambodia, Thailand, and a lot of others. Japan has ancient
hatreds of China and Korea. Which have been reciprocated for a thousand
years or more. The Rape of Nanking will show you the love shared by
Japan and China.
https://allthatsinteresting.com › rape-of-nanking-massacre
The word Kamikazi comes from the Great Chinese fleet that was wiped by
one while attacking China in earlier times. It means divine wind.
Actually we are more in danger of being talked to death by the Sky is
Falling *Wannabe*. Is he another of Rudy's socks?
On 11/2/2022 6:49 AM, Mighty Wannabe wrote:
Vincent wrote on 11/2/2022 1:52 AM:
On 11/1/2022 9:17 PM, 26C.Z968 wrote:
https://www.foxnews.com/world/us-send-b-52-bombers-australia-move-china-warns-could-trigger-arms-race
US to send B-52 bombers to Australia in move China warns could
'trigger' arms race
US defense official says sending B-52 bombers to Australia part
of long-standing alliance
Royal Australian Air Force Base (RAAF) Tindal has long been home
to U.S. B-52 bombers, but China’s foreign ministry took issue
with U.S. plans to send up to six nuclear-capable B-52 bombers
to the base in northern Australia, according to reports Monday.
Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Zhao Lijian said the U.S.
plans to increase its security alliance with Sydney "escalates
regional tensions"
. . .
Um ... I think the only diff of "nuclear-capable" is to
swap out the bomb rack. Actually, most nukes are now
probably smaller than 1000-lb conventional bombs ...
unlike in the 50s when they were *huge* things.
Oh, and a B-52 is likely the WORST way to try and
deliver nuclear weapons these days. They're big
and relatively slow and show up real good on radar.
That's why we built B-2s and B1-B's and cruise
missiles and ICBMs and such.
But it's all appearances and politics.
And it's probably good to give Xi a *little* shit
after his ascension to commie godhood ....
Prior to WWI Australia and Japan had a mutual defense pact against the
constant attempts by China to invade both.
Where did you get this nonsense? I have watched a lot of WWI
documentaries on YouTube. Japan and all European powers had colonies
and "concessions" in China. (That's what drove China into a communist
republic after WWII, which came 20 years after the end of WWI).
Germany had the colony "Tsing Tao" in northeast China as a "coaling
station" (battleships burn a lot of coal each mile at sea). Great
Britain allied with Japan to take Tsing Tao to starve German fleet of
fuel in the Pacific theatre.
It is truly regretful that you are such an ignorant bastard, but what
can one expect from a Leftist fool? Go back and do your homework, Moron!
On 11/3/22 11:01 PM, Vincent wrote:
On 11/2/2022 7:34 PM, 26C.Z968 wrote:
On 11/2/22 1:52 AM, Vincent wrote:
On 11/1/2022 9:17 PM, 26C.Z968 wrote:
https://www.foxnews.com/world/us-send-b-52-bombers-australia-move-china-warns-could-trigger-arms-race
As for the Arms race..It has started.and a while back.
Huge arms contracts have been let to the top 5 contractors ...Close
to a $Trillion Dollars with top contender Lockheed Martin and number
5 General Dynamics. Being is in the mix.
US to send B-52 bombers to Australia in move China warns could
'trigger' arms race
US defense official says sending B-52 bombers to Australia part
of long-standing alliance
Royal Australian Air Force Base (RAAF) Tindal has long been home
to U.S. B-52 bombers, but China’s foreign ministry took issue
with U.S. plans to send up to six nuclear-capable B-52 bombers
to the base in northern Australia, according to reports Monday.
Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Zhao Lijian said the U.S.
plans to increase its security alliance with Sydney "escalates
regional tensions"
. . .
Um ... I think the only diff of "nuclear-capable" is to
swap out the bomb rack. Actually, most nukes are now
probably smaller than 1000-lb conventional bombs ...
unlike in the 50s when they were *huge* things.
Oh, and a B-52 is likely the WORST way to try and
deliver nuclear weapons these days. They're big
and relatively slow and show up real good on radar.
That's why we built B-2s and B1-B's and cruise
missiles and ICBMs and such.
But it's all appearances and politics.
And it's probably good to give Xi a *little* shit
after his ascension to commie godhood ....
Prior to WWI Australia and Japan had a mutual defense pact against the >>>> constant attempts by China to invade both. Our Moron President
Wilson demanded that they disband that treaty as it interfered with
his plans for a "League of Nations". Japan had been our ally until
then. Their only defense was to invade Korea, Mongolia, and China
to beat China to the punch.
The horse-shit is getting pretty deep here .....
Fuck you!
No thanks. I do have (some) standards :-)
2-digit IQs are OFF THE LIST.
China was in NO position to invade anybody, it was
still almost entirely agrarian and its mil-tech was
barely past medieval.
Uh Huh... The Boxer Rebellion, American patrols to back up the
British drug trade during the 1800's up to the WW's A whole
encyclopedia of wars in that region of the world. Go visit a library.
Or better yet...Do some ass in the Grass jobs with the Marines or
what ever.
The Boxer Rebellion ?????????????????
That was fought with clubs and knives for
the most part and was ancient history even
in the 1930s.
Tryin' WAY too hard there .....
That is just another of the many reasons WWII came about. Thank the
Fucking Democrats for another unnecessary war. We should have
hanged Wilson! I see Biden just nixed a 4 star General that was
very competent and install another Brain dead Deadbeat Democrat.
Even had to make this one a General in order to fill the Job. China
can't beat us, but that SOB in the WhiteHouse probably will.
Destruction of America Armed forces from within.
"China can't beat us" ??? It can fry us REALLY damned bad
and a lot of its mil-tech is now well head of the West's.
Now "beat" ... depends on your meaning. We can fry 'em
real good too. No winners, so nobody gets "beat" per-se.
That's a given.... China cannot beat us! Can do a lot of damage
though. But that is it. As for a win. Your damned betcha we can. But
whats left won't be worth owning.
King of the (radioactive) shit-pile ? What a victory ....
Maybe you didn't notice those "and also" news stories over
the past couple of years - like China basically tripling
its number of ICBM silos for one.
Do you really believe China is Suicidal?(Sarcasm)
Xi knows he can burn half the population or more and
STILL be a big power, STILL in-charge.
I wonder how many Hunter's
biz dealings bought ? They also have trans-orbital "hyper-
sonics"
Do you even have any idea what ALL of the Western countries
would/could counter with?
Yes ... but again you just wind up as King Of The (Radioactive)
Shit-Pile. No victory. None at all.
If China is to be beaten, it has to be from WITHIN.
But that population is long used to bowing before
its emperors .....
now that there's really no defense against, might
not even notice them until it's WAY too late. Then their
gen-II AI autonomous micro-subs/torpedoes and gigantic
army and .......
I have also noted our weapons research for a long time. When you
become a top military advisor for our Democratic-Republic, then and
only then will I possibly add you to the information stream about
what we can or cannot do. China at the present time cannot even solve
its water shortage.
Can it intercept 99+ percent of China's ICBMs ? 99+ percent
of its hypersonics ? 99+ percent of its sub/ship-launched
systems ??? And who knows what they've put into orbit. If NOT ...
then the USA becomes a burnt-out radioactive SHIT PILE. It
would literally only take about a dozen good megaton+ hits to
accomplish that. The fallout would spread widely, The System
would implode ... starvation, anarchy and disease would do
the rest.
1st-world countries are 1st-world countries because everything
works SMOOTHLY, EFFICIENTLY, stuff arrives Just In Time, checks
clear, everything is insured, backups exist ...... Even a dozen
good nuke hits would TRASH that. No more systems, no more
smoothness, no more efficiency - and the USA and pop are NOT
set up for 3rd/4th-world living anymore. If you want me to start
going on in much higher detail about what all would go to shit
I can spend a long time typing ......... we'd lose ten or twenty
percent to the immediate attack ... and another 90 percent because
The System didn't work anymore.
If you ACTUALLY Knew Shit then you'd know THIS. But clearly
you don't, so .......
China is EXTREMELY dangerous - it just doesn't bang shoes
on the table and scream about it.
Actually China for the last 80 years has played its cards very close
to the chest. Maybe you should start your History of China when they
owned Vietnam, Cambodia, Thailand, and a lot of others. Japan has
ancient
hatreds of China and Korea. Which have been reciprocated for a
thousand years or more. The Rape of Nanking will show you the love
shared by Japan and China.
https://allthatsinteresting.com › rape-of-nanking-massacre
The word Kamikazi comes from the Great Chinese fleet that was wiped
by one while attacking China in earlier times. It means divine wind.
Actually we are more in danger of being talked to death by the Sky is
Falling *Wannabe*. Is he another of Rudy's socks?
China DOES play its games "differently" - a much longer-term
strategy. But it looks like that "term" is just about over with.
They just made ambitious Xi the modern equiv of a "god-emperor".
He has military power, and population, to burn.
Oh, since Nixon on, the USA has outsourced huge quantities of
VITAL production and resource-acquisition to China. Xi could
crush us just by turning off the faucet - it'd be years before
we could get any replacements up to speed and that'd be WAY
too late. The supply/manufacturing chain shatters. All fall
down go boom.
So put down your propaganda Talking Points and THINK about
the current realities. They're BAD and our natural inclinations,
forged by Darwin LONG before there were 'systems', work
against us. If you are counting on anything different then
you're a fuckin' MANIAC straight out of "Dr.Strangelove".
BTW, the few survivors, before they die, are gonna brick-up
your bunker and pour gasoline down the vents because you're
the most spectacular FAILURES that ever were.
Vincent wrote on 11/3/2022 10:24 PM:
On 11/2/2022 6:49 AM, Mighty Wannabe wrote:
Vincent wrote on 11/2/2022 1:52 AM:
On 11/1/2022 9:17 PM, 26C.Z968 wrote:
https://www.foxnews.com/world/us-send-b-52-bombers-australia-move-china-warns-could-trigger-arms-race
US to send B-52 bombers to Australia in move China warns could
'trigger' arms race
US defense official says sending B-52 bombers to Australia part
of long-standing alliance
Royal Australian Air Force Base (RAAF) Tindal has long been home
to U.S. B-52 bombers, but China’s foreign ministry took issue
with U.S. plans to send up to six nuclear-capable B-52 bombers
to the base in northern Australia, according to reports Monday.
Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Zhao Lijian said the U.S.
plans to increase its security alliance with Sydney "escalates
regional tensions"
. . .
Um ... I think the only diff of "nuclear-capable" is to
swap out the bomb rack. Actually, most nukes are now
probably smaller than 1000-lb conventional bombs ...
unlike in the 50s when they were *huge* things.
Oh, and a B-52 is likely the WORST way to try and
deliver nuclear weapons these days. They're big
and relatively slow and show up real good on radar.
That's why we built B-2s and B1-B's and cruise
missiles and ICBMs and such.
But it's all appearances and politics.
And it's probably good to give Xi a *little* shit
after his ascension to commie godhood ....
Prior to WWI Australia and Japan had a mutual defense pact against the >>>> constant attempts by China to invade both.
Where did you get this nonsense? I have watched a lot of WWI
documentaries on YouTube. Japan and all European powers had colonies
and "concessions" in China. (That's what drove China into a communist
republic after WWII, which came 20 years after the end of WWI).
Germany had the colony "Tsing Tao" in northeast China as a "coaling
station" (battleships burn a lot of coal each mile at sea). Great
Britain allied with Japan to take Tsing Tao to starve German fleet of
fuel in the Pacific theatre.
It is truly regretful that you are such an ignorant bastard, but what
can one expect from a Leftist fool? Go back and do your homework, Moron!
You should cite some proof of your ridiculous claim. Prior to WWI China didn't even have a decent navy boat to invade Japan or, even worse, Australia.
On 11/4/2022 1:13 AM, Mighty Wannabe wrote:
Vincent wrote on 11/3/2022 10:24 PM:
On 11/2/2022 6:49 AM, Mighty Wannabe wrote:
Vincent wrote on 11/2/2022 1:52 AM:
On 11/1/2022 9:17 PM, 26C.Z968 wrote:
https://www.foxnews.com/world/us-send-b-52-bombers-australia-move-china-warns-could-trigger-arms-race
US to send B-52 bombers to Australia in move China warns could
'trigger' arms race
US defense official says sending B-52 bombers to Australia part
of long-standing alliance
Royal Australian Air Force Base (RAAF) Tindal has long been home
to U.S. B-52 bombers, but China’s foreign ministry took issue
with U.S. plans to send up to six nuclear-capable B-52 bombers
to the base in northern Australia, according to reports Monday.
Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Zhao Lijian said the U.S.
plans to increase its security alliance with Sydney "escalates
regional tensions"
. . .
Um ... I think the only diff of "nuclear-capable" is to
swap out the bomb rack. Actually, most nukes are now
probably smaller than 1000-lb conventional bombs ...
unlike in the 50s when they were *huge* things.
Oh, and a B-52 is likely the WORST way to try and
deliver nuclear weapons these days. They're big
and relatively slow and show up real good on radar.
That's why we built B-2s and B1-B's and cruise
missiles and ICBMs and such.
But it's all appearances and politics.
And it's probably good to give Xi a *little* shit
after his ascension to commie godhood ....
Prior to WWI Australia and Japan had a mutual defense pact against
the
constant attempts by China to invade both.
Where did you get this nonsense? I have watched a lot of WWI
documentaries on YouTube. Japan and all European powers had
colonies and "concessions" in China. (That's what drove China into
a communist republic after WWII, which came 20 years after the end
of WWI). Germany had the colony "Tsing Tao" in northeast China as a
"coaling station" (battleships burn a lot of coal each mile at
sea). Great Britain allied with Japan to take Tsing Tao to starve
German fleet of fuel in the Pacific theatre.
It is truly regretful that you are such an ignorant bastard, but
what can one expect from a Leftist fool? Go back and do your
homework, Moron!
You should cite some proof of your ridiculous claim. Prior to WWI
China didn't even have a decent navy boat to invade Japan or, even
worse, Australia.
Try the Dynasty fleets prior to the birth of Christ.
If you wish to refute some fact, raise your hand and if called on
politely display your facts on refutation. Maintain a stiff upper lip
when your silly proof entertains your betters to the point of laughing
at your ignorant embarrassment.
I wonder if perhaps the world leaders should watch Utube for guidance
on how to run the world? (Vast Sarcasm)
On 11/3/22 11:01 PM, Vincent wrote:
On 11/2/2022 7:34 PM, 26C.Z968 wrote:
On 11/2/22 1:52 AM, Vincent wrote:
On 11/1/2022 9:17 PM, 26C.Z968 wrote:
https://www.foxnews.com/world/us-send-b-52-bombers-australia-move-china-warns-could-trigger-arms-race
As for the Arms race..It has started.and a while back.
Huge arms contracts have been let to the top 5 contractors ...Close to
a $Trillion Dollars with top contender Lockheed Martin and number 5
General Dynamics. Being is in the mix.
US to send B-52 bombers to Australia in move China warns could
'trigger' arms race
US defense official says sending B-52 bombers to Australia part
of long-standing alliance
Royal Australian Air Force Base (RAAF) Tindal has long been home
to U.S. B-52 bombers, but China’s foreign ministry took issue
with U.S. plans to send up to six nuclear-capable B-52 bombers
to the base in northern Australia, according to reports Monday.
Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Zhao Lijian said the U.S.
plans to increase its security alliance with Sydney "escalates
regional tensions"
. . .
Um ... I think the only diff of "nuclear-capable" is to
swap out the bomb rack. Actually, most nukes are now
probably smaller than 1000-lb conventional bombs ...
unlike in the 50s when they were *huge* things.
Oh, and a B-52 is likely the WORST way to try and
deliver nuclear weapons these days. They're big
and relatively slow and show up real good on radar.
That's why we built B-2s and B1-B's and cruise
missiles and ICBMs and such.
But it's all appearances and politics.
And it's probably good to give Xi a *little* shit
after his ascension to commie godhood ....
Prior to WWI Australia and Japan had a mutual defense pact against the >>>> constant attempts by China to invade both. Our Moron President
Wilson demanded that they disband that treaty as it interfered with
his plans for a "League of Nations". Japan had been our ally until
then. Their only defense was to invade Korea, Mongolia, and China to
beat China to the punch.
The horse-shit is getting pretty deep here .....
Fuck you!
No thanks. I do have (some) standards :-)
2-digit IQs are OFF THE LIST.
China was in NO position to invade anybody, it was
still almost entirely agrarian and its mil-tech was
barely past medieval.
Uh Huh... The Boxer Rebellion, American patrols to back up the British
drug trade during the 1800's up to the WW's A whole encyclopedia of
wars in that region of the world. Go visit a library. Or better
yet...Do some ass in the Grass jobs with the Marines or what ever.
The Boxer Rebellion ?????????????????
That was fought with clubs and knives for
the most part and was ancient history even
in the 1930s.
Tryin' WAY too hard there .....
That is just another of the many reasons WWII came about. Thank the
Fucking Democrats for another unnecessary war. We should have hanged
Wilson! I see Biden just nixed a 4 star General that was very
competent and install another Brain dead Deadbeat Democrat. Even had
to make this one a General in order to fill the Job. China can't
beat us, but that SOB in the WhiteHouse probably will. Destruction
of America Armed forces from within.
"China can't beat us" ??? It can fry us REALLY damned bad
and a lot of its mil-tech is now well head of the West's.
Now "beat" ... depends on your meaning. We can fry 'em
real good too. No winners, so nobody gets "beat" per-se.
That's a given.... China cannot beat us! Can do a lot of damage
though. But that is it. As for a win. Your damned betcha we can. But
whats left won't be worth owning.
King of the (radioactive) shit-pile ? What a victory ....
Maybe you didn't notice those "and also" news stories over
the past couple of years - like China basically tripling
its number of ICBM silos for one.
Do you really believe China is Suicidal?(Sarcasm)
Xi knows he can burn half the population or more and
STILL be a big power, STILL in-charge.
I wonder how many Hunter's
biz dealings bought ? They also have trans-orbital "hyper-
sonics"
Do you even have any idea what ALL of the Western countries
would/could counter with?
Yes ... but again you just wind up as King Of The (Radioactive)
Shit-Pile. No victory. None at all.
If China is to be beaten, it has to be from WITHIN.
But that population is long used to bowing before
its emperors .....
now that there's really no defense against, might
not even notice them until it's WAY too late. Then their
gen-II AI autonomous micro-subs/torpedoes and gigantic
army and .......
I have also noted our weapons research for a long time. When you
become a top military advisor for our Democratic-Republic, then and
only then will I possibly add you to the information stream about what
we can or cannot do. China at the present time cannot even solve its
water shortage.
Can it intercept 99+ percent of China's ICBMs ? 99+ percent
of its hypersonics ? 99+ percent of its sub/ship-launched
systems ??? And who knows what they've put into orbit. If NOT ...
then the USA becomes a burnt-out radioactive SHIT PILE. It
would literally only take about a dozen good megaton+ hits to
accomplish that. The fallout would spread widely, The System
would implode ... starvation, anarchy and disease would do
the rest.
1st-world countries are 1st-world countries because everything
works SMOOTHLY, EFFICIENTLY, stuff arrives Just In Time, checks
clear, everything is insured, backups exist ......
good nuke hits would TRASH that. No more systems, no more
smoothness, no more efficiency - and the USA and pop are NOT
set up for 3rd/4th-world living anymore. If you want me to start
going on in much higher detail about what all would go to shit
I can spend a long time typing ......... we'd lose ten or twenty
percent to the immediate attack ... and another 90 percent because
The System didn't work anymore.
If you ACTUALLY Knew Shit then you'd know THIS. But clearly
you don't, so .......
China is EXTREMELY dangerous - it just doesn't bang shoes
on the table and scream about it.
Actually China for the last 80 years has played its cards very close
to the chest. Maybe you should start your History of China when they
owned Vietnam, Cambodia, Thailand, and a lot of others. Japan has ancient
hatreds of China and Korea. Which have been reciprocated for a
thousand years or more. The Rape of Nanking will show you the love
shared by Japan and China.
https://allthatsinteresting.com › rape-of-nanking-massacre
The word Kamikazi comes from the Great Chinese fleet that was wiped by
one while attacking China in earlier times. It means divine wind.
Actually we are more in danger of being talked to death by the Sky is
Falling *Wannabe*. Is he another of Rudy's socks?
China DOES play its games "differently" - a much longer-term
strategy. But it looks like that "term" is just about over with.
They just made ambitious Xi the modern equiv of a "god-emperor".
He has military power, and population, to burn.
Oh, since Nixon on, the USA has outsourced huge quantities of
VITAL production and resource-acquisition to China. Xi could
crush us just by turning off the faucet - it'd be years before
we could get any replacements up to speed and that'd be WAY
too late. The supply/manufacturing chain shatters. All fall
down go boom.
So put down your propaganda Talking Points and THINK about
the current realities. They're BAD and our natural inclinations,
forged by Darwin LONG before there were 'systems', work
against us. If you are counting on anything different then
you're a fuckin' MANIAC straight out of "Dr.Strangelove".
BTW, the few survivors, before they die, are gonna brick-up
your bunker and pour gasoline down the vents because you're
the most spectacular FAILURES that ever were.
On 11/3/2022 11:00 PM, 26C.Z968 wrote:
On 11/3/22 11:01 PM, Vincent wrote:
On 11/2/2022 7:34 PM, 26C.Z968 wrote:
On 11/2/22 1:52 AM, Vincent wrote:
On 11/1/2022 9:17 PM, 26C.Z968 wrote:
https://www.foxnews.com/world/us-send-b-52-bombers-australia-move-china-warns-could-trigger-arms-race
As for the Arms race..It has started.and a while back.
Huge arms contracts have been let to the top 5 contractors ...Close
to a $Trillion Dollars with top contender Lockheed Martin and number
5 General Dynamics. Being is in the mix.
US to send B-52 bombers to Australia in move China warns could
'trigger' arms race
US defense official says sending B-52 bombers to Australia part
of long-standing alliance
Royal Australian Air Force Base (RAAF) Tindal has long been home
to U.S. B-52 bombers, but China’s foreign ministry took issue
with U.S. plans to send up to six nuclear-capable B-52 bombers
to the base in northern Australia, according to reports Monday.
Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Zhao Lijian said the U.S.
plans to increase its security alliance with Sydney "escalates
regional tensions"
. . .
Um ... I think the only diff of "nuclear-capable" is to
swap out the bomb rack. Actually, most nukes are now
probably smaller than 1000-lb conventional bombs ...
unlike in the 50s when they were *huge* things.
Oh, and a B-52 is likely the WORST way to try and
deliver nuclear weapons these days. They're big
and relatively slow and show up real good on radar.
That's why we built B-2s and B1-B's and cruise
missiles and ICBMs and such.
But it's all appearances and politics.
And it's probably good to give Xi a *little* shit
after his ascension to commie godhood ....
Prior to WWI Australia and Japan had a mutual defense pact against
the
constant attempts by China to invade both. Our Moron President
Wilson demanded that they disband that treaty as it interfered
with his plans for a "League of Nations". Japan had been our ally
until then. Their only defense was to invade Korea, Mongolia, and
China to beat China to the punch.
The horse-shit is getting pretty deep here .....
As for the Horse-shit, that is a product from you horses asses.
Fuck you!
No thanks. I do have (some) standards :-)
No real American would believe that.
2-digit IQs are OFF THE LIST.
So? You are retiring from posting your ridiculous very low IQ comments?
China was in NO position to invade anybody, it was
still almost entirely agrarian and its mil-tech was
barely past medieval.
Uh Huh... The Boxer Rebellion, American patrols to back up the
British drug trade during the 1800's up to the WW's A whole
encyclopedia of wars in that region of the world. Go visit a
library. Or better yet...Do some ass in the Grass jobs with the
Marines or what ever.
The Boxer Rebellion ?????????????????
That was fought with clubs and knives for
the most part and was ancient history even
in the 1930s.
Nope...gunpowder.
Tryin' WAY too hard there .....
You are arguing with yourself. First you say there was no ability for
war prior to WWI and then you say there was. How about the Dynasty
wars? or did you forget the huge fleets of Sailing vessels that attack
Japan, Vietnam, Cambodia etc...etc..Firing rockets and cannon and
smoothbore long guns. All powered by Gunpowder inventd before Marco
Polo's time.
That is just another of the many reasons WWII came about. Thank
the Fucking Democrats for another unnecessary war. We should have
hanged Wilson! I see Biden just nixed a 4 star General that was
very competent and install another Brain dead Deadbeat Democrat.
Even had to make this one a General in order to fill the Job.
China can't beat us, but that SOB in the WhiteHouse probably will.
Destruction of America Armed forces from within.
"China can't beat us" ??? It can fry us REALLY damned bad
and a lot of its mil-tech is now well head of the West's.
Now "beat" ... depends on your meaning. We can fry 'em
real good too. No winners, so nobody gets "beat" per-se.
That's a given.... China cannot beat us! Can do a lot of damage
though. But that is it. As for a win. Your damned betcha we can. But
whats left won't be worth owning.
King of the (radioactive) shit-pile ? What a victory ....
Maybe you didn't notice those "and also" news stories over
the past couple of years - like China basically tripling
its number of ICBM silos for one.
Do you really believe China is Suicidal?(Sarcasm)
Xi knows he can burn half the population or more and
STILL be a big power, STILL in-charge.
Were you one of the Clinton draft dodgers that spent the Viet Nam war
doped up in Canada?
I wonder how many Hunter's
biz dealings bought ? They also have trans-orbital "hyper-
sonics"
Do you even have any idea what ALL of the Western countries
would/could counter with?
Yes ... but again you just wind up as King Of The (Radioactive)
Shit-Pile. No victory. None at all.
If China is to be beaten, it has to be from WITHIN.
But that population is long used to bowing before
its emperors .....
Times have changed, now the proletariat drives Buick's (made in China).
I suggest that you visit Aberdeen.
now that there's really no defense against, might
not even notice them until it's WAY too late. Then their
gen-II AI autonomous micro-subs/torpedoes and gigantic
army and .......
I have also noted our weapons research for a long time. When you
become a top military advisor for our Democratic-Republic, then and
only then will I possibly add you to the information stream about
what we can or cannot do. China at the present time cannot even
solve its water shortage.
Can it intercept 99+ percent of China's ICBMs ? 99+ percent
of its hypersonics ? 99+ percent of its sub/ship-launched
systems ??? And who knows what they've put into orbit. If NOT ...
then the USA becomes a burnt-out radioactive SHIT PILE. It
would literally only take about a dozen good megaton+ hits to
accomplish that. The fallout would spread widely, The System
would implode ... starvation, anarchy and disease would do
the rest.
The Sky is falling!!
1st-world countries are 1st-world countries because everything
works SMOOTHLY, EFFICIENTLY, stuff arrives Just In Time, checks
clear, everything is insured, backups exist ......
Apparently you do not reside on Planet earth.
Even a dozen
good nuke hits would TRASH that. No more systems, no more
smoothness, no more efficiency - and the USA and pop are NOT
set up for 3rd/4th-world living anymore. If you want me to start
going on in much higher detail about what all would go to shit
I can spend a long time typing ......... we'd lose ten or twenty
percent to the immediate attack ... and another 90 percent because
The System didn't work anymore.
If you ACTUALLY Knew Shit then you'd know THIS. But clearly
you don't, so .......
Yep. Your just another armchair warrior. Thank God your type is not protecting America.
China is EXTREMELY dangerous - it just doesn't bang shoes
on the table and scream about it.
Actually China for the last 80 years has played its cards very close
to the chest. Maybe you should start your History of China when they
owned Vietnam, Cambodia, Thailand, and a lot of others. Japan has
ancient
hatreds of China and Korea. Which have been reciprocated for a
thousand years or more. The Rape of Nanking will show you the love
shared by Japan and China.
https://allthatsinteresting.com › rape-of-nanking-massacre
The word Kamikazi comes from the Great Chinese fleet that was wiped
by one while attacking China in earlier times. It means divine wind.
Actually we are more in danger of being talked to death by the Sky
is Falling *Wannabe*. Is he another of Rudy's socks?
China DOES play its games "differently" - a much longer-term
strategy. But it looks like that "term" is just about over with.
They just made ambitious Xi the modern equiv of a "god-emperor".
He has military power, and population, to burn.
In China that can change in a heartbeat. Like in Korea...The Grunts
were told to charge until we were over run. Amazingly when the bodies
built up, the Chinese grunts ran in the other direction. Maybe you
should do a body count on that for comparison. Same thing is happening
in the Ukraine.
Oh, since Nixon on, the USA has outsourced huge quantities of
VITAL production and resource-acquisition to China. Xi could
crush us just by turning off the faucet - it'd be years before
we could get any replacements up to speed and that'd be WAY
too late. The supply/manufacturing chain shatters. All fall
down go boom.
Sure! Sure! That sky is falling again. I believe it is time to export
you. We really don't need naysayers when it comes to maintaining our beautiful strong country. Wannabe is tiring of playing Solitaire in
his leftist part of Canada. I am sure he would enjoy you company.
So put down your propaganda Talking Points and THINK about
the current realities. They're BAD and our natural inclinations,
forged by Darwin LONG before there were 'systems', work
against us. If you are counting on anything different then
you're a fuckin' MANIAC straight out of "Dr.Strangelove".
BTW, the few survivors, before they die, are gonna brick-up
your bunker and pour gasoline down the vents because you're
the most spectacular FAILURES that ever were.
Actually I liked General Curtis Le may better.
Are you of French extraction? I have heard of French surrender Monkeys
but you would be the first I run across.
Vincent wrote on 11/5/2022 7:54 AM:
n
Sure! Sure! That sky is falling again. I believe it is time to export
you. We really don't need naysayers when it comes to maintaining our
beautiful strong country. Wannabe is tiring of playing Solitaire in
his leftist part of Canada. I am sure he would enjoy you company.
You close your eyes and plug your ears won't change anything. The US is
an empire in decline.
Vincent wrote on 11/5/2022 7:54 AM:
On 11/3/2022 11:00 PM, 26C.Z968 wrote:
Uh Huh... The Boxer Rebellion, American patrols to back up the
British drug trade during the 1800's up to the WW's A whole
encyclopedia of wars in that region of the world. Go visit a
library. Or better yet...Do some ass in the Grass jobs with the
Marines or what ever.
The Boxer Rebellion ?????????????????
That was fought with clubs and knives for
the most part and was ancient history even
in the 1930s.
Nope...gunpowder.
They fought with martial-arts (Kung Fu). That word "Kung Fu" wasn't
known to the English world so they used the word "boxer", which means fighting with fist, not gunpowder. If the rebels really fought with gunpowder, then the event wouldn't have been called "Boxer Rebellion".
Tryin' WAY too hard there .....
You are arguing with yourself. First you say there was no ability for
war prior to WWI and then you say there was. How about the Dynasty
wars? or did you forget the huge fleets of Sailing vessels that attacked
Japan, Vietnam, Cambodia etc...etc..Firing rockets and cannon and
smooth bore long guns. All powered by Gunpowder invented before Marco
Polo's time.
Please look up on the internet. All the events you have just mentioned
were hundreds of years before WWI. China had declined to a point that
every European power had a colony or "concession" in China before WWI.
That is just another of the many reasons WWII came about. Thank
the Fucking Democrats for another unnecessary war. We should have
hanged Wilson! I see Biden just nixed a 4 star General that was
very competent and install another Brain dead Deadbeat Democrat.
Even had to make this one a General in order to fill the Job.
China can't beat us, but that SOB in the WhiteHouse probably will. >>>>>> Destruction of America Armed forces from within.
"China can't beat us" ??? It can fry us REALLY damned bad
and a lot of its mil-tech is now well head of the West's.
Now "beat" ... depends on your meaning. We can fry 'em
real good too. No winners, so nobody gets "beat" per-se.
That's a given.... China cannot beat us! Can do a lot of damage
though. But that is it. As for a win. Your damned betcha we can. But
whats left won't be worth owning.
King of the (radioactive) shit-pile ? What a victory ....
Maybe you didn't notice those "and also" news stories over
the past couple of years - like China basically tripling
its number of ICBM silos for one.
Do you really believe China is Suicidal?(Sarcasm)
Xi knows he can burn half the population or more and
STILL be a big power, STILL in-charge.
Were you one of the Clinton draft dodgers that spent the Viet Nam war
doped up in Canada?
You should be ashamed that you didn't join the Draft Resistance Movement
to stop the Viet Nam invasion.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 496 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 56:40:55 |
| Calls: | 9,760 |
| Calls today: | 1 |
| Files: | 13,742 |
| Messages: | 6,185,279 |