SYDNEY (Reuters) - Australia said on Monday it would accelerate plans to
buy advanced sea mines to protect its maritime routes and ports from >"potential aggressors" amid China's plans to increase its influence in the >Pacific region.
China has plans to step up its presence in the Pacific and entered a
security pact with Solomon Islands last year, raising concerns in the
United States and Australia, who for decades have seen the region as their >sphere of influence.
Australia has been looking to boost its defence spending over the past few >years, including entering into a deal in 2021 to buy nuclear submarines
from the United States and Britain.
($1 = 1.4323 Australian dollars)
(Reporting by Renju Jose. Editing by Gerry Doyle)
https://news.yahoo.com/australia-speed-purchase-sea-mines-034254381.html
On Mon, 13 Feb 2023 05:18:36 -0000 (UTC), J D Young
<jdyoung2@ymail.com> wrote:
SYDNEY (Reuters) - Australia said on Monday it would accelerate plans to
buy advanced sea mines to protect its maritime routes and ports from
"potential aggressors" amid China's plans to increase its influence in
the
Pacific region.
Laudable. But will they also be placed along the length of submarine
cables which could be cut by some enemy, in many locations, so
isolating Oz from the rest of the world?
China has plans to step up its presence in the Pacific and entered a
security pact with Solomon Islands last year, raising concerns in the
United States and Australia, who for decades have seen the region as
their
sphere of influence.
Australia has been looking to boost its defence spending over the past
few
years, including entering into a deal in 2021 to buy nuclear submarines
from the United States and Britain.
($1 = 1.4323 Australian dollars)
(Reporting by Renju Jose. Editing by Gerry Doyle)
https://news.yahoo.com/australia-speed-purchase-sea-mines-034254381.html
On Tue, 14 Feb 2023 06:59:52 +1100, Peter Jason <pj@jostle.com> wrote:
On Mon, 13 Feb 2023 05:18:36 -0000 (UTC), J D Young
<jdyoung2@ymail.com> wrote:
SYDNEY (Reuters) - Australia said on Monday it would accelerate plans to >>> buy advanced sea mines to protect its maritime routes and ports from
"potential aggressors" amid China's plans to increase its influence in
the
Pacific region.
Laudable. But will they also be placed along the length of submarine
cables which could be cut by some enemy, in many locations, so
isolating Oz from the rest of the world?
Even if all the submarine cables were all cut in multiple places,
we would not be isolated from the rest of the world due to satellites.
China has plans to step up its presence in the Pacific and entered a
security pact with Solomon Islands last year, raising concerns in the
United States and Australia, who for decades have seen the region as
their
sphere of influence.
Australia has been looking to boost its defence spending over the past
few
years, including entering into a deal in 2021 to buy nuclear submarines
from the United States and Britain.
($1 = 1.4323 Australian dollars)
(Reporting by Renju Jose. Editing by Gerry Doyle)
https://news.yahoo.com/australia-speed-purchase-sea-mines-034254381.html
On Tue, 14 Feb 2023 07:18:14 +1100, "Rod Speed"
<rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, 14 Feb 2023 06:59:52 +1100, Peter Jason <pj@jostle.com> wrote:
On Mon, 13 Feb 2023 05:18:36 -0000 (UTC), J D Young
<jdyoung2@ymail.com> wrote:
SYDNEY (Reuters) - Australia said on Monday it would accelerate plans to >>>> buy advanced sea mines to protect its maritime routes and ports from
"potential aggressors" amid China's plans to increase its influence in >>>> the
Pacific region.
Laudable. But will they also be placed along the length of submarine
cables which could be cut by some enemy, in many locations, so
isolating Oz from the rest of the world?
Even if all the submarine cables were all cut in multiple places,
we would not be isolated from the rest of the world due to satellites.
That is true. But the cost and queuing would slow things down to a
crawl. Presumably use would be rationed to the benefit of we posters
in aus.politics.
China has plans to step up its presence in the Pacific and entered a
security pact with Solomon Islands last year, raising concerns in the
United States and Australia, who for decades have seen the region as
their
sphere of influence.
Australia has been looking to boost its defence spending over the past >>>> few
years, including entering into a deal in 2021 to buy nuclear submarines >>>> from the United States and Britain.
($1 = 1.4323 Australian dollars)
(Reporting by Renju Jose. Editing by Gerry Doyle)
https://news.yahoo.com/australia-speed-purchase-sea-mines-034254381.html
On 2/13/2023 5:22 PM, Peter Jason wrote:
On Tue, 14 Feb 2023 07:18:14 +1100, "Rod Speed"
<rod.sp...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, 14 Feb 2023 06:59:52 +1100, Peter Jason <p...@jostle.com> wrote: >>
On Mon, 13 Feb 2023 05:18:36 -0000 (UTC), J D Young
<jdyo...@ymail.com> wrote:
SYDNEY (Reuters) - Australia said on Monday it would accelerate plans to >>>> buy advanced sea mines to protect its maritime routes and ports from >>>> "potential aggressors" amid China's plans to increase its influence in >>>> the
Pacific region.
Laudable. But will they also be placed along the length of submarine
cables which could be cut by some enemy, in many locations, so
isolating Oz from the rest of the world?
Even if all the submarine cables were all cut in multiple places,
we would not be isolated from the rest of the world due to satellites.
That is true. But the cost and queuing would slow things down to aBut in times of a real war, would those Satellites survive the first few hours? Possibly be the very first causalities. To prevent return
crawl. Presumably use would be rationed to the benefit of we posters
in aus.politics.
missile targeting.
China has plans to step up its presence in the Pacific and entered a >>>> security pact with Solomon Islands last year, raising concerns in the >>>> United States and Australia, who for decades have seen the region as >>>> their
sphere of influence.
Australia has been looking to boost its defence spending over the past >>>> few
years, including entering into a deal in 2021 to buy nuclear submarines >>>> from the United States and Britain.
($1 = 1.4323 Australian dollars)
(Reporting by Renju Jose. Editing by Gerry Doyle)
https://news.yahoo.com/australia-speed-purchase-sea-mines-034254381.html
On 2/13/2023 5:22 PM, Peter Jason wrote:
On Tue, 14 Feb 2023 07:18:14 +1100, "Rod Speed"
<rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, 14 Feb 2023 06:59:52 +1100, Peter Jason <pj@jostle.com> wrote:
On Mon, 13 Feb 2023 05:18:36 -0000 (UTC), J D Young
<jdyoung2@ymail.com> wrote:
SYDNEY (Reuters) - Australia said on Monday it would accelerate plans to >>>>> buy advanced sea mines to protect its maritime routes and ports from >>>>> "potential aggressors" amid China's plans to increase its influence in >>>>> the
Pacific region.
Laudable. But will they also be placed along the length of submarine
cables which could be cut by some enemy, in many locations, so
isolating Oz from the rest of the world?
Even if all the submarine cables were all cut in multiple places,
we would not be isolated from the rest of the world due to satellites.
That is true. But the cost and queuing would slow things down to a
crawl. Presumably use would be rationed to the benefit of we posters
in aus.politics.
But in times of a real war, would those Satellites survive the first few >hours? Possibly be the very first causalities. To prevent return
missile targeting.
On 2/13/2023 5:22 PM, Peter Jason wrote:
On Tue, 14 Feb 2023 07:18:14 +1100, "Rod Speed"
<rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, 14 Feb 2023 06:59:52 +1100, Peter Jason <pj@jostle.com> wrote:That is true. But the cost and queuing would slow things down to a
On Mon, 13 Feb 2023 05:18:36 -0000 (UTC), J D Young
<jdyoung2@ymail.com> wrote:
SYDNEY (Reuters) - Australia said on Monday it would accelerate
plans to
buy advanced sea mines to protect its maritime routes and ports from >>>>> "potential aggressors" amid China's plans to increase its influence
in
the
Pacific region.
Laudable. But will they also be placed along the length of submarine
cables which could be cut by some enemy, in many locations, so
isolating Oz from the rest of the world?
Even if all the submarine cables were all cut in multiple places,
we would not be isolated from the rest of the world due to satellites.
crawl. Presumably use would be rationed to the benefit of we posters
in aus.politics.
But in times of a real war, would those Satellites survive the first few hours?
Possibly be the very first causalities. To prevent return missile
targeting.
China has plans to step up its presence in the Pacific and entered a >>>>> security pact with Solomon Islands last year, raising concerns in the >>>>> United States and Australia, who for decades have seen the region as >>>>> their
sphere of influence.
Australia has been looking to boost its defence spending over the
past
few
years, including entering into a deal in 2021 to buy nuclear
submarines
from the United States and Britain.
($1 = 1.4323 Australian dollars)
(Reporting by Renju Jose. Editing by Gerry Doyle)
https://news.yahoo.com/australia-speed-purchase-sea-mines-034254381.html
On Tue, 14 Feb 2023 22:29:43 +1100, Leper <Leper@malokaicolony.com> wrote:
On 2/13/2023 5:22 PM, Peter Jason wrote:
On Tue, 14 Feb 2023 07:18:14 +1100, "Rod Speed"
<rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, 14 Feb 2023 06:59:52 +1100, Peter Jason <pj@jostle.com> wrote: >>>>That is true. But the cost and queuing would slow things down to a
On Mon, 13 Feb 2023 05:18:36 -0000 (UTC), J D Young
<jdyoung2@ymail.com> wrote:
SYDNEY (Reuters) - Australia said on Monday it would accelerate
plans to
buy advanced sea mines to protect its maritime routes and ports from >>>>>> "potential aggressors" amid China's plans to increase its influence >>>>>> in
the
Pacific region.
Laudable. But will they also be placed along the length of submarine >>>>> cables which could be cut by some enemy, in many locations, so
isolating Oz from the rest of the world?
Even if all the submarine cables were all cut in multiple places,
we would not be isolated from the rest of the world due to satellites.
crawl. Presumably use would be rationed to the benefit of we posters
in aus.politics.
But in times of a real war, would those Satellites survive the first few
hours?
Yep, there will never be a full nuclear holocaust and even
if there was, it would never be possible to take out all the
satellites anyway.
Possibly be the very first causalities. To prevent return missile
targeting.
Mindlessly pig ignorant. INS alone is all you need to nuke missiles.
PetzlChina has plans to step up its presence in the Pacific and entered a >>>>>> security pact with Solomon Islands last year, raising concerns in the >>>>>> United States and Australia, who for decades have seen the region as >>>>>> their
sphere of influence.
Australia has been looking to boost its defence spending over the
past
few
years, including entering into a deal in 2021 to buy nuclear
submarines
from the United States and Britain.
($1 = 1.4323 Australian dollars)
(Reporting by Renju Jose. Editing by Gerry Doyle)
https://news.yahoo.com/australia-speed-purchase-sea-mines-034254381.html --
On Wed, 15 Feb 2023 11:31:16 +1100, "Rod Speed"
<rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, 15 Feb 2023 07:53:33 +1100, Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> wrote:From Britannica
On Wed, 15 Feb 2023 03:55:49 +1100, "Rod Speed"
<rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, 14 Feb 2023 22:29:43 +1100, Leper <Leper@malokaicolony.com>
wrote:
On 2/13/2023 5:22 PM, Peter Jason wrote:
On Tue, 14 Feb 2023 07:18:14 +1100, "Rod Speed"
<rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, 14 Feb 2023 06:59:52 +1100, Peter Jason <pj@jostle.com>That is true. But the cost and queuing would slow things down to >>>>>> a
wrote:
On Mon, 13 Feb 2023 05:18:36 -0000 (UTC), J D Young
<jdyoung2@ymail.com> wrote:
SYDNEY (Reuters) - Australia said on Monday it would accelerate >>>>>>>>> plans to
buy advanced sea mines to protect its maritime routes and ports >>>>>>>>> from
"potential aggressors" amid China's plans to increase its
influence
in
the
Pacific region.
Laudable. But will they also be placed along the length of
submarine
cables which could be cut by some enemy, in many locations, so >>>>>>>> isolating Oz from the rest of the world?
Even if all the submarine cables were all cut in multiple places, >>>>>>> we would not be isolated from the rest of the world due to
satellites.
crawl. Presumably use would be rationed to the benefit of we
posters
in aus.politics.
But in times of a real war, would those Satellites survive the first >>>>> few
hours?
Yep, there will never be a full nuclear holocaust and even
if there was, it would never be possible to take out all the
satellites anyway.
Russia exploded a satellite to create orbiting debris to do just that
<https://www.armscontrol.org/act/2022-03/features/russias-anti-satellite-weapons-asymmetric-response-us-aerospace-superiority#:~:text=Russia%20conducted%20a%20direct-ascent,1%2C500%20pieces%20of%20orbital%20debris.>
https://tinyurl.com/2f9sh9b9
Pity it destroyed sweet fuck all satellites.
Russia conducted a direct-ascent hit-to-kill anti-satellite (ASAT)
test on November 15, 2021, striking a Russian satellite and rendering
it into more than 1,500 pieces of orbital debris.
And had sweet fuck all effect on other satellites.
Possibly be the very first causalities. To prevent return missile
targeting.
Mindlessly pig ignorant. INS alone is all you need to nuke missiles.
A nuclear war
Not gunna happen, you watch.
will be quick with a number of possibilities!
1st
<https://www.britannica.com/science/nuclear-electromagnetic-pulse>
knoces out communication radar cars aircraft
BULLSHIT.
For a high-yield explosion of approximately 10 megatons detonated 320
km (200 miles) above the centre of the continental United States,
almost the entire country, as well as parts of Mexico and Canada,
would be affected by EMP—destroying practically all electronic devices
and electrical transformers.
Procedures to improve the ability of
networks, especially military command and control systems, to
withstand EMP are known as “hardening.”
2nd
Multiple nuclear strike
3rd
The end of the world as we know it
BULLSHIT.
All will stratecically happen in minutes
Russian subs are staion off
USA coast the American Allies like Australia
no need to hurry.
China has plans to step up its presence in the Pacific and
entered
a
security pact with Solomon Islands last year, raising concerns in >>>>>>>>> the
United States and Australia, who for decades have seen the region >>>>>>>>> as
their
sphere of influence.
Australia has been looking to boost its defence spending over the >>>>>>>>> past
few
years, including entering into a deal in 2021 to buy nuclear >>>>>>>>> submarines
from the United States and Britain.
($1 = 1.4323 Australian dollars)
(Reporting by Renju Jose. Editing by Gerry Doyle)
https://news.yahoo.com/australia-speed-purchase-sea-mines-034254381.html
On Wed, 15 Feb 2023 03:55:49 +1100, "Rod Speed"
<rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, 14 Feb 2023 22:29:43 +1100, Leper <Leper@malokaicolony.com>
wrote:
On 2/13/2023 5:22 PM, Peter Jason wrote:
On Tue, 14 Feb 2023 07:18:14 +1100, "Rod Speed"
<rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, 14 Feb 2023 06:59:52 +1100, Peter Jason <pj@jostle.com>That is true. But the cost and queuing would slow things down to a
wrote:
On Mon, 13 Feb 2023 05:18:36 -0000 (UTC), J D Young
<jdyoung2@ymail.com> wrote:
SYDNEY (Reuters) - Australia said on Monday it would accelerate
plans to
buy advanced sea mines to protect its maritime routes and ports
from
"potential aggressors" amid China's plans to increase its influence >>>>>>> in
the
Pacific region.
Laudable. But will they also be placed along the length of
submarine
cables which could be cut by some enemy, in many locations, so
isolating Oz from the rest of the world?
Even if all the submarine cables were all cut in multiple places,
we would not be isolated from the rest of the world due to
satellites.
crawl. Presumably use would be rationed to the benefit of we posters
in aus.politics.
But in times of a real war, would those Satellites survive the first
few
hours?
Yep, there will never be a full nuclear holocaust and even
if there was, it would never be possible to take out all the
satellites anyway.
Russia exploded a satellite to create orbiting debris to do just that <https://www.armscontrol.org/act/2022-03/features/russias-anti-satellite-weapons-asymmetric-response-us-aerospace-superiority#:~:text=Russia%20conducted%20a%20direct-ascent,1%2C500%20pieces%20of%20orbital%20debris.>
https://tinyurl.com/2f9sh9b9
Russia conducted a direct-ascent hit-to-kill anti-satellite (ASAT)
test on November 15, 2021, striking a Russian satellite and rendering
it into more than 1,500 pieces of orbital debris.
Possibly be the very first causalities. To prevent return missile
targeting.
Mindlessly pig ignorant. INS alone is all you need to nuke missiles.
A nuclear war
will be quick with a number of possibilities!
1st
<https://www.britannica.com/science/nuclear-electromagnetic-pulse>
knoces out communication radar cars aircraft
2nd
Multiple nuclear strike
3rd
The end of the world as we know it
China has plans to step up its presence in the Pacific and entered >>>>>>> a
security pact with Solomon Islands last year, raising concerns in >>>>>>> the
United States and Australia, who for decades have seen the region >>>>>>> as
their
sphere of influence.
Australia has been looking to boost its defence spending over the >>>>>>> past
few
years, including entering into a deal in 2021 to buy nuclear
submarines
from the United States and Britain.
($1 = 1.4323 Australian dollars)
(Reporting by Renju Jose. Editing by Gerry Doyle)
https://news.yahoo.com/australia-speed-purchase-sea-mines-034254381.html
On Wed, 15 Feb 2023 07:53:33 +1100, Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, 15 Feb 2023 03:55:49 +1100, "Rod Speed"
<rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, 14 Feb 2023 22:29:43 +1100, Leper <Leper@malokaicolony.com>
wrote:
On 2/13/2023 5:22 PM, Peter Jason wrote:
On Tue, 14 Feb 2023 07:18:14 +1100, "Rod Speed"
<rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, 14 Feb 2023 06:59:52 +1100, Peter Jason <pj@jostle.com>That is true. But the cost and queuing would slow things down to a >>>>> crawl. Presumably use would be rationed to the benefit of we posters >>>>> in aus.politics.
wrote:
On Mon, 13 Feb 2023 05:18:36 -0000 (UTC), J D Young
<jdyoung2@ymail.com> wrote:
SYDNEY (Reuters) - Australia said on Monday it would accelerate >>>>>>>> plans to
buy advanced sea mines to protect its maritime routes and ports >>>>>>>> from
"potential aggressors" amid China's plans to increase its influence >>>>>>>> in
the
Pacific region.
Laudable. But will they also be placed along the length of
submarine
cables which could be cut by some enemy, in many locations, so
isolating Oz from the rest of the world?
Even if all the submarine cables were all cut in multiple places,
we would not be isolated from the rest of the world due to
satellites.
But in times of a real war, would those Satellites survive the first
few
hours?
Yep, there will never be a full nuclear holocaust and even
if there was, it would never be possible to take out all the
satellites anyway.
Russia exploded a satellite to create orbiting debris to do just that
<https://www.armscontrol.org/act/2022-03/features/russias-anti-satellite-weapons-asymmetric-response-us-aerospace-superiority#:~:text=Russia%20conducted%20a%20direct-ascent,1%2C500%20pieces%20of%20orbital%20debris.>
https://tinyurl.com/2f9sh9b9
Pity it destroyed sweet fuck all satellites.
Russia conducted a direct-ascent hit-to-kill anti-satellite (ASAT)
test on November 15, 2021, striking a Russian satellite and rendering
it into more than 1,500 pieces of orbital debris.
And had sweet fuck all effect on other satellites.
Possibly be the very first causalities. To prevent return missile
targeting.
Mindlessly pig ignorant. INS alone is all you need to nuke missiles.
A nuclear war
Not gunna happen, you watch.
will be quick with a number of possibilities!
1st
<https://www.britannica.com/science/nuclear-electromagnetic-pulse>
knoces out communication radar cars aircraft
BULLSHIT.
2nd
Multiple nuclear strike
3rd
The end of the world as we know it
BULLSHIT.
--China has plans to step up its presence in the Pacific and entered >>>>>>>> a
security pact with Solomon Islands last year, raising concerns in >>>>>>>> the
United States and Australia, who for decades have seen the region >>>>>>>> as
their
sphere of influence.
Australia has been looking to boost its defence spending over the >>>>>>>> past
few
years, including entering into a deal in 2021 to buy nuclear
submarines
from the United States and Britain.
($1 = 1.4323 Australian dollars)
(Reporting by Renju Jose. Editing by Gerry Doyle)
https://news.yahoo.com/australia-speed-purchase-sea-mines-034254381.html
On Wed, 15 Feb 2023 11:44:48 +1100, Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, 15 Feb 2023 11:31:16 +1100, "Rod Speed"
<rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, 15 Feb 2023 07:53:33 +1100, Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> wrote:From Britannica
On Wed, 15 Feb 2023 03:55:49 +1100, "Rod Speed"
<rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, 14 Feb 2023 22:29:43 +1100, Leper <Leper@malokaicolony.com>
wrote:
On 2/13/2023 5:22 PM, Peter Jason wrote:
On Tue, 14 Feb 2023 07:18:14 +1100, "Rod Speed"
<rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, 14 Feb 2023 06:59:52 +1100, Peter Jason <pj@jostle.com> >>>>>>>> wrote:That is true. But the cost and queuing would slow things down >>>>>>> to a
On Mon, 13 Feb 2023 05:18:36 -0000 (UTC), J D Young
<jdyoung2@ymail.com> wrote:
SYDNEY (Reuters) - Australia said on Monday it would accelerate >>>>>>>>>> plans to
buy advanced sea mines to protect its maritime routes and ports >>>>>>>>>> from
"potential aggressors" amid China's plans to increase its
influence
in
the
Pacific region.
Laudable. But will they also be placed along the length of
submarine
cables which could be cut by some enemy, in many locations, so >>>>>>>>> isolating Oz from the rest of the world?
Even if all the submarine cables were all cut in multiple places, >>>>>>>> we would not be isolated from the rest of the world due to
satellites.
crawl. Presumably use would be rationed to the benefit of we
posters
in aus.politics.
But in times of a real war, would those Satellites survive the first >>>>>> few
hours?
Yep, there will never be a full nuclear holocaust and even
if there was, it would never be possible to take out all the
satellites anyway.
Russia exploded a satellite to create orbiting debris to do just that
<https://www.armscontrol.org/act/2022-03/features/russias-anti-satellite-weapons-asymmetric-response-us-aerospace-superiority#:~:text=Russia%20conducted%20a%20direct-ascent,1%2C500%20pieces%20of%20orbital%20debris.>
https://tinyurl.com/2f9sh9b9
Pity it destroyed sweet fuck all satellites.
Russia conducted a direct-ascent hit-to-kill anti-satellite (ASAT)
test on November 15, 2021, striking a Russian satellite and rendering
it into more than 1,500 pieces of orbital debris.
And had sweet fuck all effect on other satellites.
Possibly be the very first causalities. To prevent return missile
targeting.
Mindlessly pig ignorant. INS alone is all you need to nuke missiles.
A nuclear war
Not gunna happen, you watch.
will be quick with a number of possibilities!
1st
<https://www.britannica.com/science/nuclear-electromagnetic-pulse>
knoces out communication radar cars aircraft
BULLSHIT.
For a high-yield explosion of approximately 10 megatons detonated 320
km (200 miles) above the centre of the continental United States,
almost the entire country, as well as parts of Mexico and Canada,
would be affected by EMP—destroying practically all electronic devices
and electrical transformers.
Mindless pig ignorant bullshit. We never got anything
like that effect with the atmospheric tests.
Procedures to improve the ability of
networks, especially military command and control systems, to
withstand EMP are known as “hardening.”
2nd
Multiple nuclear strike
3rd
The end of the world as we know it
BULLSHIT.
All will stratecically happen in minutes
More mindless bullshit.
Russian subs are staion off
USA coast the American Allies like Australia
More mindless bullshit.
no need to hurry.
China has plans to step up its presence in the Pacific and >>>>>>>>>> entered
a
security pact with Solomon Islands last year, raising concerns >>>>>>>>>> in
the
United States and Australia, who for decades have seen the >>>>>>>>>> region
as
their
sphere of influence.
Australia has been looking to boost its defence spending over >>>>>>>>>> the
past
few
years, including entering into a deal in 2021 to buy nuclear >>>>>>>>>> submarines
from the United States and Britain.
($1 = 1.4323 Australian dollars)
(Reporting by Renju Jose. Editing by Gerry Doyle)
https://news.yahoo.com/australia-speed-purchase-sea-mines-034254381.html
On Wed, 15 Feb 2023 03:55:49 +1100, "Rod Speed"
<rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, 14 Feb 2023 22:29:43 +1100, Leper <Leper@malokaicolony.com> wrote: >>Russia exploded a satellite to create orbiting debris to do just that <https://www.armscontrol.org/act/2022-03/features/russias-anti-satellite-weapons-asymmetric-response-us-aerospace-superiority#:~:text=Russia%20conducted%20a%20direct-ascent,1%2C500%20pieces%20of%20orbital%20debris.>
On 2/13/2023 5:22 PM, Peter Jason wrote:
On Tue, 14 Feb 2023 07:18:14 +1100, "Rod Speed"
<rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, 14 Feb 2023 06:59:52 +1100, Peter Jason <pj@jostle.com> wrote: >>>>>in aus.politics.
On Mon, 13 Feb 2023 05:18:36 -0000 (UTC), J D Young
<jdyoung2@ymail.com> wrote:
SYDNEY (Reuters) - Australia said on Monday it would accelerate
plans to
buy advanced sea mines to protect its maritime routes and ports from >>>>>>> "potential aggressors" amid China's plans to increase its influence >>>>>>> in
the
Pacific region.
Laudable. But will they also be placed along the length of submarine >>>>>> cables which could be cut by some enemy, in many locations, so
isolating Oz from the rest of the world?
Even if all the submarine cables were all cut in multiple places,
we would not be isolated from the rest of the world due to satellites. >>>> That is true. But the cost and queuing would slow things down to a >>>> crawl. Presumably use would be rationed to the benefit of we posters
But in times of a real war, would those Satellites survive the first few >>> hours?
Yep, there will never be a full nuclear holocaust and even
if there was, it would never be possible to take out all the
satellites anyway.
https://tinyurl.com/2f9sh9b9
Russia conducted a direct-ascent hit-to-kill anti-satellite (ASAT)
test on November 15, 2021, striking a Russian satellite and rendering
it into more than 1,500 pieces of orbital debris.
A nuclear war will be quick with a number of possibilities!Possibly be the very first causalities. To prevent return missile
targeting.
Mindlessly pig ignorant. INS alone is all you need to nuke missiles.
1st
<https://www.britannica.com/science/nuclear-electromagnetic-pulse>
knoces out communication radar cars aircraft
2nd
Multiple nuclear strike
3rd
The end of the world as we know it
China has plans to step up its presence in the Pacific and entered a >>>>>>> security pact with Solomon Islands last year, raising concerns in the >>>>>>> United States and Australia, who for decades have seen the region as >>>>>>> their
sphere of influence.
Australia has been looking to boost its defence spending over the >>>>>>> past
few
years, including entering into a deal in 2021 to buy nuclear
submarines
from the United States and Britain.
($1 = 1.4323 Australian dollars)
(Reporting by Renju Jose. Editing by Gerry Doyle)
https://news.yahoo.com/australia-speed-purchase-sea-mines-034254381.html
On Tue, 14 Feb 2023 22:29:43 +1100, Leper <Leper@malokaicolony.com> wrote:
On 2/13/2023 5:22 PM, Peter Jason wrote:
On Tue, 14 Feb 2023 07:18:14 +1100, "Rod Speed"
<rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, 14 Feb 2023 06:59:52 +1100, Peter Jason <pj@jostle.com> wrote: >>>> That is true. But the cost and queuing would slow things down to a
On Mon, 13 Feb 2023 05:18:36 -0000 (UTC), J D Young
<jdyoung2@ymail.com> wrote:
SYDNEY (Reuters) - Australia said on Monday it would accelerate
plans to
buy advanced sea mines to protect its maritime routes and ports from >>>>>> "potential aggressors" amid China's plans to increase its
influence in
the
Pacific region.
Laudable. But will they also be placed along the length of submarine >>>>> cables which could be cut by some enemy, in many locations, so
isolating Oz from the rest of the world?
Even if all the submarine cables were all cut in multiple places,
we would not be isolated from the rest of the world due to satellites.
crawl. Presumably use would be rationed to the benefit of we posters
in aus.politics.
But in times of a real war, would those Satellites survive the first
few hours?
Yep, there will never be a full nuclear holocaust and even
if there was, it would never be possible to take out all the
satellites anyway.
Possibly be the very first causalities. To prevent return missile
targeting.
Mindlessly pig ignorant. INS alone is all you need to nuke missiles.
China has plans to step up its presence in the Pacific and entered a >>>>>> security pact with Solomon Islands last year, raising concerns in the >>>>>> United States and Australia, who for decades have seen the region as >>>>>> their
sphere of influence.
Australia has been looking to boost its defence spending over the
past
few
years, including entering into a deal in 2021 to buy nuclear
submarines
from the United States and Britain.
($1 = 1.4323 Australian dollars)
(Reporting by Renju Jose. Editing by Gerry Doyle)
https://news.yahoo.com/australia-speed-purchase-sea-mines-034254381.html
On Tuesday, 14 February 2023 at 06:29:41 UTC-5, Leper wrote:
On 2/13/2023 5:22 PM, Peter Jason wrote:
On Tue, 14 Feb 2023 07:18:14 +1100, "Rod Speed"But in times of a real war, would those Satellites survive the first few
<rod.sp...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, 14 Feb 2023 06:59:52 +1100, Peter Jason <p...@jostle.com> wrote: >>>>
On Mon, 13 Feb 2023 05:18:36 -0000 (UTC), J D Young
<jdyo...@ymail.com> wrote:
SYDNEY (Reuters) - Australia said on Monday it would accelerate plans to >>>>>> buy advanced sea mines to protect its maritime routes and ports from >>>>>> "potential aggressors" amid China's plans to increase its influence in >>>>>> the
Pacific region.
Laudable. But will they also be placed along the length of submarine >>>>> cables which could be cut by some enemy, in many locations, so
isolating Oz from the rest of the world?
Even if all the submarine cables were all cut in multiple places,
we would not be isolated from the rest of the world due to satellites.
That is true. But the cost and queuing would slow things down to a
crawl. Presumably use would be rationed to the benefit of we posters
in aus.politics.
hours? Possibly be the very first causalities. To prevent return
missile targeting.
China has plans to step up its presence in the Pacific and entered a >>>>>> security pact with Solomon Islands last year, raising concerns in the >>>>>> United States and Australia, who for decades have seen the region as >>>>>> their
sphere of influence.
Australia has been looking to boost its defence spending over the past >>>>>> few
years, including entering into a deal in 2021 to buy nuclear submarines >>>>>> from the United States and Britain.
($1 = 1.4323 Australian dollars)
(Reporting by Renju Jose. Editing by Gerry Doyle)
https://news.yahoo.com/australia-speed-purchase-sea-mines-034254381.html
There are a lot of satellites. Sorting, targeting and shooting would be non-trivial.
2022 data from geospatialworld: https://www.geospatialworld.net/prime/business-and-industry-trends/how-many-satellites-orbiting-earth/
Number of satellites Purpose
3135 Communications
1030 Earth Observation
385 Technology development/demonstration
154 Navigation/positioning
22 Earth science
18 Other purposes
On 2/14/2023 10:55 AM, Rod Speed wrote:
On Tue, 14 Feb 2023 22:29:43 +1100, Leper <Leper@malokaicolony.com>
wrote:
On 2/13/2023 5:22 PM, Peter Jason wrote:Yep, there will never be a full nuclear holocaust and even
On Tue, 14 Feb 2023 07:18:14 +1100, "Rod Speed"
<rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, 14 Feb 2023 06:59:52 +1100, Peter Jason <pj@jostle.com>That is true. But the cost and queuing would slow things down to a
wrote:
On Mon, 13 Feb 2023 05:18:36 -0000 (UTC), J D Young
<jdyoung2@ymail.com> wrote:
SYDNEY (Reuters) - Australia said on Monday it would accelerate
plans to
buy advanced sea mines to protect its maritime routes and ports
from
"potential aggressors" amid China's plans to increase its
influence in
the
Pacific region.
Laudable. But will they also be placed along the length of
submarine
cables which could be cut by some enemy, in many locations, so
isolating Oz from the rest of the world?
Even if all the submarine cables were all cut in multiple places,
we would not be isolated from the rest of the world due to
satellites.
crawl. Presumably use would be rationed to the benefit of we posters
in aus.politics.
But in times of a real war, would those Satellites survive the first
few hours?
if there was, it would never be possible to take out all the
satellites anyway.
Possibly be the very first causalities. To prevent return missileMindlessly pig ignorant. INS alone is all you need to nuke missiles.
targeting.
Not a lot of our birds are on INS.
We stopped designing those in the 70's or 80's
and have used less of the old designs for our systems.
We still have Subs that have to set positions before firing.
But not very many have to do that.
Most of the very best manufacturers(researchers) are long gone. i.e Autonetics INS, Hughs INS Division, Raytheon etc.
I still have a tytac of the best one with all moving parts. A Nuclear
screen in the early days was the tactical answer to both incoming ICBM's
and blocking/destroying satellite targeting. I understand the planners
are thinking the same tactics to stop Drone Swarms.
If and when the SHTF, you will find me in the back yard BBQing a brisket
and imbibing of my favorite drink. I am sure the girls will be perusing
their bibles. I am sure you are aware of the targeting system in the Minuteman system? We put that bird active in about 1962 and it has many upgrades since. But it is one of our reliable solid repellent go-to
birds.
You did note that the balloon killers we sent out were heat seekers.
Which means all of those bogies were producing heat in order to be hit.
China has plans to step up its presence in the Pacific and entered >>>>>>> a
security pact with Solomon Islands last year, raising concerns in >>>>>>> the
United States and Australia, who for decades have seen the region >>>>>>> as
their
sphere of influence.
Australia has been looking to boost its defence spending over the >>>>>>> past
few
years, including entering into a deal in 2021 to buy nuclear
submarines
from the United States and Britain.
($1 = 1.4323 Australian dollars)
(Reporting by Renju Jose. Editing by Gerry Doyle)
https://news.yahoo.com/australia-speed-purchase-sea-mines-034254381.html
Russian subs are staion off
USA coast the American Allies like Australia no need to hurry.
All will stratecically happen in minutes Russian subs are staion off
USA coast the American Allies like Australia no need to hurry.
America researched and designed a multiple laser to kill satellites.
Many years ago. Never heard how it turned out. Never hear that it was >operational.
Not a lot of our birds are on INS. We stopped designing those in the
70's or 80's and have used less of the old designs for our systems.
We still have Subs that have to set positions before firing. But not
very many have to do that. Most of the very best
manufacturers(researchers) are long gone. i.e Autonetics INS, Hughs INS >Division, Raytheon etc. I still have a tytac of the best one with all
moving parts. A Nuclear screen in the early days was the tactical answer
to both incoming ICBM's and blocking/destroying satellite targeting. I >understand the planners are thinking the same tactics to stop Drone
Swarms. If and when the SHTF, you will find me in the back yard BBQing a >brisket and imbibing of my favorite drink. I am sure the girls will be >perusing their bibles. I am sure you are aware of the targeting system
in the Minuteman system? We put that bird active in about 1962 and it
has many upgrades since. But it is one of our reliable solid repellent
go-to birds.
You did note that the balloon killers we sent out were heat seekers.
Which means all of those bogies were producing heat in order to be hit.
On Wed, 15 Feb 2023 11:44:48 +1100, Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> wrote:Snip
On Wed, 15 Feb 2023 11:31:16 +1100, "Rod Speed"
<rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote:
From Britannica
Not gunna happen, you watch.
will be quick with a number of possibilities!
1st
<https://www.britannica.com/science/nuclear-electromagnetic-pulse>
knoces out communication radar cars aircraft
BULLSHIT.
For a high-yield explosion of approximately 10 megatons detonated 320
km (200 miles) above the centre of the continental United States,
almost the entire country, as well as parts of Mexico and Canada,
would be affected by EMP—destroying practically all electronic devices
and electrical transformers.
Mindless pig ignorant bullshit. We never got anything
like that effect with the atmospheric tests.
Procedures to improve the ability of
networks, especially military command and control systems, to
withstand EMP are known as “hardening.”
2nd
Multiple nuclear strike
3rd
The end of the world as we know it
BULLSHIT.
All will stratecically happen in minutes
More mindless bullshit.
Russian subs are staioned off
USA coast the American Allies like Australia
More mindless bullshit.
--no need to hurry.
China has plans to step up its presence in the Pacific and >>>>>>>>>> entered
a
security pact with Solomon Islands last year, raising concerns in >>>>>>>>>> the
United States and Australia, who for decades have seen the region >>>>>>>>>> as
their
sphere of influence.
Australia has been looking to boost its defence spending over the >>>>>>>>>> past
few
years, including entering into a deal in 2021 to buy nuclear >>>>>>>>>> submarines
from the United States and Britain.
($1 = 1.4323 Australian dollars)
(Reporting by Renju Jose. Editing by Gerry Doyle)
https://news.yahoo.com/australia-speed-purchase-sea-mines-034254381.html
On Wed, 15 Feb 2023 13:38:28 +1100, Leper <Leper@malokaicolony.com> wrote:
On 2/14/2023 10:55 AM, Rod Speed wrote:
On Tue, 14 Feb 2023 22:29:43 +1100, Leper <Leper@malokaicolony.com>
wrote:
On 2/13/2023 5:22 PM, Peter Jason wrote:Â Yep, there will never be a full nuclear holocaust and even
On Tue, 14 Feb 2023 07:18:14 +1100, "Rod Speed"
<rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, 14 Feb 2023 06:59:52 +1100, Peter Jason <pj@jostle.com> That is true. But the cost and queuing would slow things down to a >>>>> crawl. Presumably use would be rationed to the benefit of we posters >>>>> in aus.politics.
wrote:
On Mon, 13 Feb 2023 05:18:36 -0000 (UTC), J D Young
<jdyoung2@ymail.com> wrote:
SYDNEY (Reuters) - Australia said on Monday it would accelerate >>>>>>>> plans to
buy advanced sea mines to protect its maritime routes and ports >>>>>>>> from
"potential aggressors" amid China's plans to increase its
influence in
the
Pacific region.
Laudable. But will they also be placed along the length of
submarine
cables which could be cut by some enemy, in many locations, so
isolating Oz from the rest of the world?
Even if all the submarine cables were all cut in multiple places,
we would not be isolated from the rest of the world due to
satellites.
But in times of a real war, would those Satellites survive the first
few hours?
if there was, it would never be possible to take out all the
satellites anyway.
Possibly be the very first causalities. To prevent return missile Mindlessly pig ignorant. INS alone is all you need to nuke missiles.
targeting.
Not a lot of our birds are on INS.
BULLSHIT. They have that for when they lose communication
with the satellites, stupid. The accuracy need for a NUKE ICBM
is perfectly adequate with INS.
We stopped designing those in the 70's or 80's
There have been sweet fuck all new nuke
icbms produced since then except by China.
and have used less of the old designs for our systems.
Whose systems ?
We still have Subs that have to set positions before firing.
But most don't.
But not very many have to do that.
So the dregs like that are irrelevant.
Most of the very best manufacturers(researchers) are long gone. i.e
Autonetics INS, Hughs INS Division, Raytheon etc.
But the sub launched nukes haven't.
I still have a tytac of the best one with all moving parts. A Nuclear
screen in the early days was the tactical answer to both incoming
ICBM's and blocking/destroying satellite targeting. I understand the
planners are thinking the same tactics to stop Drone Swarms.
Irrelevant, those aren't nuke icbms.
If and when the SHTF, you will find me in the back yard BBQing a
brisket and imbibing of my favorite drink. I am sure the girls will be
perusing their bibles. I am sure you are aware of the targeting system
in the Minuteman system? We put that bird active in about 1962 and it
has many upgrades since. But it is one of our reliable solid repellent
go-to birds.
And INS is all it needs to put a nuke where
it matters if there is no alternative left.
You did note that the balloon killers we sent out were heat seekers.
Which means all of those bogies were producing heat in order to be hit.
Obviously the payload does that, that's why it has solar panels, stupid.
On Tue, 14 Feb 2023 20:38:28 -0600, Leper <Leper@MalokaiColony.com> wrote:
Not a lot of our birds are on INS. We stopped designing those in the
70's or 80's and have used less of the old designs for our systems.
We still have Subs that have to set positions before firing. But not
very many have to do that. Most of the very best
manufacturers(researchers) are long gone. i.e Autonetics INS, Hughs INS
Division, Raytheon etc. I still have a tytac of the best one with all
moving parts. A Nuclear screen in the early days was the tactical answer
to both incoming ICBM's and blocking/destroying satellite targeting. I
understand the planners are thinking the same tactics to stop Drone
Swarms. If and when the SHTF, you will find me in the back yard BBQing a
brisket and imbibing of my favorite drink. I am sure the girls will be
perusing their bibles. I am sure you are aware of the targeting system
in the Minuteman system? We put that bird active in about 1962 and it
has many upgrades since. But it is one of our reliable solid repellent
go-to birds.
You did note that the balloon killers we sent out were heat seekers.
Which means all of those bogies were producing heat in order to be hit.
If you're going to spew this much bullshit, would you mined spraying some Glade after?
Swill
On Tue, 14 Feb 2023 20:40:57 -0600, Leper <Leper@MalokaiColony.com> wrote:
America researched and designed a multiple laser to kill satellites.
Many years ago. Never heard how it turned out. Never hear that it was
operational.
That's not the sort of thing Defense is going to be broadcasting the details of.
Swill
--
Welcome to reality. Enjoy your visit!
Heroyam slava! Glory to the Heroes!
Sláva UkrajĂni! Glory to Ukraine!
On 2/14/2023 9:57 PM, Rod Speed wrote:
On Wed, 15 Feb 2023 13:38:28 +1100, Leper <Leper@malokaicolony.com>
wrote:
On 2/14/2023 10:55 AM, Rod Speed wrote:BULLSHIT. They have that for when they lose communication
On Tue, 14 Feb 2023 22:29:43 +1100, Leper <Leper@malokaicolony.com>
wrote:
On 2/13/2023 5:22 PM, Peter Jason wrote:Yep, there will never be a full nuclear holocaust and even
On Tue, 14 Feb 2023 07:18:14 +1100, "Rod Speed"
<rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, 14 Feb 2023 06:59:52 +1100, Peter Jason <pj@jostle.com>That is true. But the cost and queuing would slow things down to >>>>>> a
wrote:
On Mon, 13 Feb 2023 05:18:36 -0000 (UTC), J D Young
<jdyoung2@ymail.com> wrote:
SYDNEY (Reuters) - Australia said on Monday it would accelerate >>>>>>>>> plans to
buy advanced sea mines to protect its maritime routes and ports >>>>>>>>> from
"potential aggressors" amid China's plans to increase its
influence in
the
Pacific region.
Laudable. But will they also be placed along the length of
submarine
cables which could be cut by some enemy, in many locations, so >>>>>>>> isolating Oz from the rest of the world?
Even if all the submarine cables were all cut in multiple places, >>>>>>> we would not be isolated from the rest of the world due to
satellites.
crawl. Presumably use would be rationed to the benefit of we
posters
in aus.politics.
But in times of a real war, would those Satellites survive the first >>>>> few hours?
if there was, it would never be possible to take out all the
satellites anyway.
Possibly be the very first causalities. To prevent return missileMindlessly pig ignorant. INS alone is all you need to nuke missiles.
targeting.
Not a lot of our birds are on INS.
with the satellites, stupid. The accuracy need for a NUKE ICBM
is perfectly adequate with INS.
We stopped designing those in the 70's or 80'sThere have been sweet fuck all new nuke
icbms produced since then except by China.
and have used less of the old designs for our systems.Whose systems ?
We still have Subs that have to set positions before firing.But most don't.
But not very many have to do that.So the dregs like that are irrelevant.
Most of the very best manufacturers(researchers) are long gone. i.eBut the sub launched nukes haven't.
Autonetics INS, Hughs INS Division, Raytheon etc.
I still have a tytac of the best one with all moving parts. A NuclearIrrelevant, those aren't nuke icbms.
screen in the early days was the tactical answer to both incoming
ICBM's and blocking/destroying satellite targeting. I understand the
planners are thinking the same tactics to stop Drone Swarms.
If and when the SHTF, you will find me in the back yard BBQing aAnd INS is all it needs to put a nuke where
brisket and imbibing of my favorite drink. I am sure the girls will be
perusing their bibles. I am sure you are aware of the targeting system
in the Minuteman system? We put that bird active in about 1962 and it
has many upgrades since. But it is one of our reliable solid repellent
go-to birds.
it matters if there is no alternative left.
You did note that the balloon killers we sent out were heat seekers.Obviously the payload does that, that's why it has solar panels,
Which means all of those bogies were producing heat in order to be hit.
stupid.
Your vast ignorance makes no sense at all. I do hope you won't hurt
yourself doing simple things like breathing.
The Nuclear shield is still on the table due to its EMP.
On Wed, 15 Feb 2023 11:44:48 +1100, Petzl wrote:
All will stratecically happen in minutes Russian subs are staion off
USA coast the American Allies like Australia no need to hurry.
Question: Do you really think anybody is going to be cowed by empty threats of nuclear
war?
Question 2: Are you so tired of living that death by fire would be a pleasure to you?
A major exchange between USA and Russia is unlikely to be one missile
at a time tit-for-tat. It will be a full blown surprise attack to
disable continental United States, almost the entire country, as well
as parts of Mexico and Canada, would be affected by EMP—destroying >practically all electronic devices and electrical transformers.
Irrelevant to what is being discussed, whether
nuke icbms and sub launched nukes will do
fine even with no communication with anything
is available when they are launched before
any incoming nuke has any chance to do EMP.
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
Irrelevant to what is being discussed, whether
nuke icbms and sub launched nukes will do
fine even with no communication with anything
is available when they are launched before
any incoming nuke has any chance to do EMP.
EMPs can't go deep into an ocean.
On Wed, 15 Feb 2023 03:55:49 +1100, "Rod Speed"
<rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, 14 Feb 2023 22:29:43 +1100, Leper <Leper@malokaicolony.com> wrote: >>Russia exploded a satellite to create orbiting debris to do just that <https://www.armscontrol.org/act/2022-03/features/russias-anti-satellite-weapons-asymmetric-response-us-aerospace-superiority#:~:text=Russia%20conducted%20a%20direct-ascent,1%2C500%20pieces%20of%20orbital%20debris.>
On 2/13/2023 5:22 PM, Peter Jason wrote:
On Tue, 14 Feb 2023 07:18:14 +1100, "Rod Speed"
<rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, 14 Feb 2023 06:59:52 +1100, Peter Jason <pj@jostle.com> wrote: >>>>>in aus.politics.
On Mon, 13 Feb 2023 05:18:36 -0000 (UTC), J D Young
<jdyoung2@ymail.com> wrote:
SYDNEY (Reuters) - Australia said on Monday it would accelerate
plans to
buy advanced sea mines to protect its maritime routes and ports from >>>>>>> "potential aggressors" amid China's plans to increase its influence >>>>>>> in
the
Pacific region.
Laudable. But will they also be placed along the length of submarine >>>>>> cables which could be cut by some enemy, in many locations, so
isolating Oz from the rest of the world?
Even if all the submarine cables were all cut in multiple places,
we would not be isolated from the rest of the world due to satellites. >>>> That is true. But the cost and queuing would slow things down to a >>>> crawl. Presumably use would be rationed to the benefit of we posters
But in times of a real war, would those Satellites survive the first few >>> hours?
Yep, there will never be a full nuclear holocaust and even
if there was, it would never be possible to take out all the
satellites anyway.
https://tinyurl.com/2f9sh9b9
Russia conducted a direct-ascent hit-to-kill anti-satellite (ASAT)
test on November 15, 2021, striking a Russian satellite and rendering
it into more than 1,500 pieces of orbital debris.
A nuclear war will be quick with a number of possibilities!Possibly be the very first causalities. To prevent return missile
targeting.
Mindlessly pig ignorant. INS alone is all you need to nuke missiles.
1st
<https://www.britannica.com/science/nuclear-electromagnetic-pulse>
knoces out communication radar cars aircraft
2nd
Multiple nuclear strike
3rd
The end of the world as we know it
China has plans to step up its presence in the Pacific and entered a >>>>>>> security pact with Solomon Islands last year, raising concerns in the >>>>>>> United States and Australia, who for decades have seen the region as >>>>>>> their
sphere of influence.
Australia has been looking to boost its defence spending over the >>>>>>> past
few
years, including entering into a deal in 2021 to buy nuclear
submarines
from the United States and Britain.
($1 = 1.4323 Australian dollars)
(Reporting by Renju Jose. Editing by Gerry Doyle)
https://news.yahoo.com/australia-speed-purchase-sea-mines-034254381.html
On Wed, 15 Feb 2023 11:44:48 +1100, Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, 15 Feb 2023 11:31:16 +1100, "Rod Speed"
<rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, 15 Feb 2023 07:53:33 +1100, Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> wrote:From Britannica
On Wed, 15 Feb 2023 03:55:49 +1100, "Rod Speed"
<rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, 14 Feb 2023 22:29:43 +1100, Leper <Leper@malokaicolony.com>
wrote:
On 2/13/2023 5:22 PM, Peter Jason wrote:
On Tue, 14 Feb 2023 07:18:14 +1100, "Rod Speed"
<rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, 14 Feb 2023 06:59:52 +1100, Peter Jason <pj@jostle.com> >>>>>>>> wrote: That is true. But the cost and queuing would slow things down >>>>>>> to a
On Mon, 13 Feb 2023 05:18:36 -0000 (UTC), J D Young
<jdyoung2@ymail.com> wrote:
SYDNEY (Reuters) - Australia said on Monday it would accelerate >>>>>>>>>> plans to
buy advanced sea mines to protect its maritime routes and ports >>>>>>>>>> from
"potential aggressors" amid China's plans to increase its
influence
in
the
Pacific region.
Laudable. But will they also be placed along the length of >>>>>>>>> submarine
cables which could be cut by some enemy, in many locations, so >>>>>>>>> isolating Oz from the rest of the world?
Even if all the submarine cables were all cut in multiple places, >>>>>>>> we would not be isolated from the rest of the world due to
satellites.
crawl. Presumably use would be rationed to the benefit of we
posters
in aus.politics.
But in times of a real war, would those Satellites survive the first >>>>>> few
hours?
Yep, there will never be a full nuclear holocaust and even
if there was, it would never be possible to take out all the
satellites anyway.
Russia exploded a satellite to create orbiting debris to do just that
<https://www.armscontrol.org/act/2022-03/features/russias-anti-satellite-weapons-asymmetric-response-us-aerospace-superiority#:~:text=Russia%20conducted%20a%20direct-ascent,1%2C500%20pieces%20of%20orbital%20debris.>
    https://tinyurl.com/2f9sh9b9
Pity it destroyed sweet fuck all satellites.
Russia conducted a direct-ascent hit-to-kill anti-satellite (ASAT)
test on November 15, 2021, striking a Russian satellite and rendering
it into more than 1,500 pieces of orbital debris.
And had sweet fuck all effect on other satellites.
Possibly be the very first causalities. To prevent return missile
targeting.
Mindlessly pig ignorant. INS alone is all you need to nuke missiles.
A nuclear war
Not gunna happen, you watch.
will be quick with a number of possibilities!
1st
<https://www.britannica.com/science/nuclear-electromagnetic-pulse>
knoces out communication radar cars aircraft
BULLSHIT.
For a high-yield explosion of approximately 10 megatons detonated 320
km (200 miles) above the centre of the continental United States,
almost the entire country, as well as parts of Mexico and Canada,
would be affected by EMP—destroying practically all electronic devices
and electrical transformers.
Mindless pig ignorant bullshit. We never got anything
like that effect with the atmospheric tests.
A nuclear war will be quick with a number of possibilities!
1st
<https://www.britannica.com/science/nuclear-electromagnetic-pulse>
knoces out communication radar cars aircraft
2nd
Multiple nuclear strike
3rd
The end of the world as we know it
I agree. EMP would definitely kill an INS guidance as they are now a
solid state electronics device. We stop mechanical INS back in the late
50's and 60's. Shielding might help some, but we decided long ago that
it was a losing solution.
On Tue, 14 Feb 2023 20:40:57 -0600, Leper <Leper@MalokaiColony.com> wrote:
America researched and designed a multiple laser to kill satellites.
Many years ago. Never heard how it turned out. Never heard that it was
operational.
That's not the sort of thing Defense is going to be broadcasting the details of.
Swill
--
Welcome to reality. Enjoy your visit!
Heroyam slava! Glory to the Heroes!
Sláva UkrajĂni! Glory to Ukraine!
On Wed, 15 Feb 2023 13:38:28 +1100, Leper <Leper@malokaicolony.com> wrote:
On 2/14/2023 10:55 AM, Rod Speed wrote:
On Tue, 14 Feb 2023 22:29:43 +1100, Leper <Leper@malokaicolony.com>
wrote:
On 2/13/2023 5:22 PM, Peter Jason wrote:Â Yep, there will never be a full nuclear holocaust and even
On Tue, 14 Feb 2023 07:18:14 +1100, "Rod Speed"
<rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, 14 Feb 2023 06:59:52 +1100, Peter Jason <pj@jostle.com> That is true. But the cost and queuing would slow things down to a >>>>> crawl. Presumably use would be rationed to the benefit of we posters >>>>> in aus.politics.
wrote:
On Mon, 13 Feb 2023 05:18:36 -0000 (UTC), J D Young
<jdyoung2@ymail.com> wrote:
SYDNEY (Reuters) - Australia said on Monday it would accelerate >>>>>>>> plans to
buy advanced sea mines to protect its maritime routes and ports >>>>>>>> from
"potential aggressors" amid China's plans to increase its
influence in
the
Pacific region.
Laudable. But will they also be placed along the length of
submarine
cables which could be cut by some enemy, in many locations, so
isolating Oz from the rest of the world?
Even if all the submarine cables were all cut in multiple places,
we would not be isolated from the rest of the world due to
satellites.
But in times of a real war, would those Satellites survive the first
few hours?
if there was, it would never be possible to take out all the
satellites anyway.
Possibly be the very first causalities. To prevent return missile Mindlessly pig ignorant. INS alone is all you need to nuke missiles.
targeting.
Not a lot of our birds are on INS.
BULLSHIT. They have that for when they lose communication
with the satellites, stupid. The accuracy need for a NUKE ICBM
is perfectly adequate with INS.
We stopped designing those in the 70's or 80's
There have been sweet fuck all new nuke
icbms produced since then except by China.
and have used less of the old designs for our systems.
Whose systems ?
We still have Subs that have to set positions before firing.
But most don't.
But not very many have to do that.
So the dregs like that are irrelevant.
Most of the very best manufacturers(researchers) are long gone. i.e
Autonetics INS, Hughs INS Division, Raytheon etc.
But the sub launched nukes haven't.
I still have a tytac of the best one with all moving parts. A Nuclear
screen in the early days was the tactical answer to both incoming
ICBM's and blocking/destroying satellite targeting. I understand the
planners are thinking the same tactics to stop Drone Swarms.
Irrelevant, those aren't nuke icbms.
If and when the SHTF, you will find me in the back yard BBQing a
brisket and imbibing of my favorite drink. I am sure the girls will be
perusing their bibles. I am sure you are aware of the targeting system
in the Minuteman system? We put that bird active in about 1962 and it
has many upgrades since. But it is one of our reliable solid repellent
go-to birds.
And INS is all it needs to put a nuke where
it matters if there is no alternative left.
You did note that the balloon killers we sent out were heat seekers.
Which means all of those bogies were producing heat in order to be hit.
Obviously the payload does that, that's why it has solar panels, stupid.
China has plans to step up its presence in the Pacific and
entered a
security pact with Solomon Islands last year, raising concerns >>>>>>>> in the
United States and Australia, who for decades have seen the
region as
their
sphere of influence.
Australia has been looking to boost its defence spending over
the past
few
years, including entering into a deal in 2021 to buy nuclear
submarines
from the United States and Britain.
($1 = 1.4323 Australian dollars)
(Reporting by Renju Jose. Editing by Gerry Doyle)
https://news.yahoo.com/australia-speed-purchase-sea-mines-034254381.html
On Tue, 14 Feb 2023 20:38:28 -0600, Leper <Leper@MalokaiColony.com> wrote:
Not a lot of our birds are on INS. We stopped designing those in the
70's or 80's and have used less of the old designs for our systems.
We still have Subs that have to set positions before firing. But not
very many have to do that. Most of the very best
manufacturers(researchers) are long gone. i.e Autonetics INS, Hughs INS
Division, Raytheon etc. I still have a tytac of the best one with all
moving parts. A Nuclear screen in the early days was the tactical answer
to both incoming ICBM's and blocking/destroying satellite targeting. I
understand the planners are thinking the same tactics to stop Drone
Swarms. If and when the SHTF, you will find me in the back yard BBQing a
brisket and imbibing of my favorite drink. I am sure the girls will be
perusing their bibles. I am sure you are aware of the targeting system
in the Minuteman system? We put that bird active in about 1962 and it
has many upgrades since. But it is one of our reliable solid repellent
go-to birds.
You did note that the balloon killers we sent out were heat seekers.
Which means all of those bogies were producing heat in order to be hit.
If you're going to spew this much bullshit, would you mined spraying some Glade after?
Swill
--
Welcome to reality. Enjoy your visit!
Heroyam slava! Glory to the Heroes!
Sláva UkrajĂni! Glory to Ukraine!
On 2/15/2023 2:48 AM, Governor Swill wrote:
On Tue, 14 Feb 2023 20:40:57 -0600, Leper <Leper@MalokaiColony.com>
wrote:
America researched and designed a multiple laser to kill satellites.
Many years ago. Never heard how it turned out. Never heard that it
was operational.
That's not the sort of thing Defense is going to be broadcasting the
details of.
Swill
Why not? After all we have Politicians and high ranking Generals that
blab their tiny brains out to foreign entities on a regular basis.
Hell we even have assholes like Kerry and the General that make
foreign policy that is detriment to America. One General even alleged
threat he would countermand a Presidential Launch order. That SOB is
still walking around free. Clinton even gave China our secret
technology to keep ICBM's from broaching at launch. Obama published
the name of seal team six and its members that assassinated Bin Laden.
Most of that team is now dead.
--
Welcome to reality. Enjoy your visit!
Heroyam slava! Glory to the Heroes!
Sláva UkrajĂni! Glory to Ukraine!
On 2/14/2023 2:53 PM, Petzl wrote:
On Wed, 15 Feb 2023 03:55:49 +1100, "Rod Speed"
<rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, 14 Feb 2023 22:29:43 +1100, Leper <Leper@malokaicolony.com>Russia exploded a satellite to create orbiting debris to do just that
wrote:
On 2/13/2023 5:22 PM, Peter Jason wrote:
On Tue, 14 Feb 2023 07:18:14 +1100, "Rod Speed"
<rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, 14 Feb 2023 06:59:52 +1100, Peter Jason <pj@jostle.com>That is true. But the cost and queuing would slow things down
wrote:
On Mon, 13 Feb 2023 05:18:36 -0000 (UTC), J D Young
<jdyoung2@ymail.com> wrote:
SYDNEY (Reuters) - Australia said on Monday it would accelerate >>>>>>>> plans to
buy advanced sea mines to protect its maritime routes and ports >>>>>>>> from "potential aggressors" amid China's plans to increase its >>>>>>>> influence in
the
Pacific region.
Laudable. But will they also be placed along the length of
submarine cables which could be cut by some enemy, in many
locations, so isolating Oz from the rest of the world?
Even if all the submarine cables were all cut in multiple places,
we would not be isolated from the rest of the world due to
satellites.
to a
crawl. Presumably use would be rationed to the benefit of we
posters in aus.politics.
But in times of a real war, would those Satellites survive the
first few hours?
Yep, there will never be a full nuclear holocaust and even
if there was, it would never be possible to take out all the
satellites anyway.
<https://www.armscontrol.org/act/2022-03/features/russias-anti-satelli
te-weapons-asymmetric-response-us-aerospace-superiority#:~:text=Russia
%20conducted%20a%20direct-ascent,1%2C500%20pieces%20of%20orbital%20deb
ris.>
https://tinyurl.com/2f9sh9b9
Russia conducted a direct-ascent hit-to-kill anti-satellite (ASAT)
test on November 15, 2021, striking a Russian satellite and rendering
it into more than 1,500 pieces of orbital debris.
A nuclear war will be quick with a number of possibilities!Possibly be the very first causalities. To prevent return missile
targeting.
Mindlessly pig ignorant. INS alone is all you need to nuke missiles.
1st
<https://www.britannica.com/science/nuclear-electromagnetic-pulse>
knoces out communication radar cars aircraft
2nd
Multiple nuclear strike
3rd
The end of the world as we know it
I agree. EMP would definitely kill an INS guidance as they are now a
solid state electronics device. We stop mechanical INS back in the
late 50's and 60's. Shielding might help some, but we decided long ago
that it was a losing solution.
China has plans to step up its presence in the Pacific and
entered a security pact with Solomon Islands last year, raising >>>>>>>> concerns in the United States and Australia, who for decades
have seen the region as their
sphere of influence.
Australia has been looking to boost its defence spending over
the past
few
years, including entering into a deal in 2021 to buy nuclear
submarines
from the United States and Britain.
($1 = 1.4323 Australian dollars)
(Reporting by Renju Jose. Editing by Gerry Doyle)
https://news.yahoo.com/australia-speed-purchase-sea-mines-034254 >>>>>>>> 381.html
On Sun, 26 Feb 2023 22:56:14 -0600, Leper <Leper@MalokaiColony.com>
wrote:
A nuclear war will be quick with a number of possibilities!
1st
<https://www.britannica.com/science/nuclear-electromagnetic-pulse>
knoces out communication radar cars aircraft
2nd
Multiple nuclear strike
3rd
The end of the world as we know it
I agree. EMP would definitely kill an INS guidance as they are now a
solid state electronics device. We stop mechanical INS back in the late
50's and 60's. Shielding might help some, but we decided long ago that
it was a losing solution.
China will be targeted by BOTH the U.S.A and Russia
Will be over with no survivivors worldwide inminutes!
On 2/15/2023 2:48 AM, Governor Swill wrote:
On Tue, 14 Feb 2023 20:40:57 -0600, Leper <Leper@MalokaiColony.com>
wrote:
America researched and designed a multiple laser to kill satellites.That's not the sort of thing Defense is going to be broadcasting the
Many years ago. Never heard how it turned out. Never heard that it was
operational.
details of.
Swill
Why not? After all we have Politicians and high ranking Generals that
blab their tiny brains out to foreign entities on a regular basis.
Hell we even have assholes like Kerry and the General that make foreign policy
that is detriment to America.
One General even alleged threat he would countermand a Presidential
Launch order.
That SOB is still walking around free. Clinton even gave China our
secret technology to keep ICBM's from broaching at launch.
Obama published the name of seal team six and its members that
assassinated Bin Laden. Most of that team is now dead.
On 2/14/2023 2:53 PM, Petzl wrote:
On Wed, 15 Feb 2023 03:55:49 +1100, "Rod Speed"
<rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, 14 Feb 2023 22:29:43 +1100, Leper <Leper@malokaicolony.com>Russia exploded a satellite to create orbiting debris to do just that
wrote:
On 2/13/2023 5:22 PM, Peter Jason wrote:
On Tue, 14 Feb 2023 07:18:14 +1100, "Rod Speed"
<rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, 14 Feb 2023 06:59:52 +1100, Peter Jason <pj@jostle.com>That is true. But the cost and queuing would slow things down to >>>>> a
wrote:
On Mon, 13 Feb 2023 05:18:36 -0000 (UTC), J D Young
<jdyoung2@ymail.com> wrote:
SYDNEY (Reuters) - Australia said on Monday it would accelerate >>>>>>>> plans to
buy advanced sea mines to protect its maritime routes and ports >>>>>>>> from
"potential aggressors" amid China's plans to increase its
influence
in
the
Pacific region.
Laudable. But will they also be placed along the length of
submarine
cables which could be cut by some enemy, in many locations, so
isolating Oz from the rest of the world?
Even if all the submarine cables were all cut in multiple places,
we would not be isolated from the rest of the world due to
satellites.
crawl. Presumably use would be rationed to the benefit of we posters >>>>> in aus.politics.
But in times of a real war, would those Satellites survive the first
few
hours?
Yep, there will never be a full nuclear holocaust and even
if there was, it would never be possible to take out all the
satellites anyway.
<https://www.armscontrol.org/act/2022-03/features/russias-anti-satellite-weapons-asymmetric-response-us-aerospace-superiority#:~:text=Russia%20conducted%20a%20direct-ascent,1%2C500%20pieces%20of%20orbital%20debris.>
https://tinyurl.com/2f9sh9b9
Russia conducted a direct-ascent hit-to-kill anti-satellite (ASAT)
test on November 15, 2021, striking a Russian satellite and rendering
it into more than 1,500 pieces of orbital debris.
A nuclear war will be quick with a number of possibilities!Possibly be the very first causalities. To prevent return missile
targeting.
Mindlessly pig ignorant. INS alone is all you need to nuke missiles.
1st
<https://www.britannica.com/science/nuclear-electromagnetic-pulse>
knoces out communication radar cars aircraft
2nd
Multiple nuclear strike
3rd
The end of the world as we know it
I agree.
EMP would definitely kill an INS guidance
as they are now a solid state electronics device.
We stop mechanical INS back in the late 50's and 60's. Shielding might
help some, but we decided long ago that it was a losing solution.
China has plans to step up its presence in the Pacific and
entered a
security pact with Solomon Islands last year, raising concerns in >>>>>>>> the
United States and Australia, who for decades have seen the region >>>>>>>> as
their
sphere of influence.
Australia has been looking to boost its defence spending over the >>>>>>>> past
few
years, including entering into a deal in 2021 to buy nuclear
submarines
from the United States and Britain.
($1 = 1.4323 Australian dollars)
(Reporting by Renju Jose. Editing by Gerry Doyle)
https://news.yahoo.com/australia-speed-purchase-sea-mines-034254381.html
On 2/14/2023 7:06 PM, Rod Speed wrote:
On Wed, 15 Feb 2023 11:44:48 +1100, Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, 15 Feb 2023 11:31:16 +1100, "Rod Speed"Mindless pig ignorant bullshit. We never got anything
<rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, 15 Feb 2023 07:53:33 +1100, Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> wrote:From Britannica
On Wed, 15 Feb 2023 03:55:49 +1100, "Rod Speed"
<rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, 14 Feb 2023 22:29:43 +1100, Leper <Leper@malokaicolony.com> >>>>>> wrote:
On 2/13/2023 5:22 PM, Peter Jason wrote:
On Tue, 14 Feb 2023 07:18:14 +1100, "Rod Speed"
<rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, 14 Feb 2023 06:59:52 +1100, Peter Jason <pj@jostle.com> >>>>>>>>> wrote:That is true. But the cost and queuing would slow things down >>>>>>>> to a
On Mon, 13 Feb 2023 05:18:36 -0000 (UTC), J D Young
<jdyoung2@ymail.com> wrote:
SYDNEY (Reuters) - Australia said on Monday it would accelerate >>>>>>>>>>> plans to
buy advanced sea mines to protect its maritime routes and ports >>>>>>>>>>> from
"potential aggressors" amid China's plans to increase its >>>>>>>>>>> influence
in
the
Pacific region.
Laudable. But will they also be placed along the length of >>>>>>>>>> submarine
cables which could be cut by some enemy, in many locations, so >>>>>>>>>> isolating Oz from the rest of the world?
Even if all the submarine cables were all cut in multiple places, >>>>>>>>> we would not be isolated from the rest of the world due to
satellites.
crawl. Presumably use would be rationed to the benefit of we
posters
in aus.politics.
But in times of a real war, would those Satellites survive the
first
few
hours?
Yep, there will never be a full nuclear holocaust and even
if there was, it would never be possible to take out all the
satellites anyway.
Russia exploded a satellite to create orbiting debris to do just that >>>>> <https://www.armscontrol.org/act/2022-03/features/russias-anti-satellite-weapons-asymmetric-response-us-aerospace-superiority#:~:text=Russia%20conducted%20a%20direct-ascent,1%2C500%20pieces%20of%20orbital%20debris.>
https://tinyurl.com/2f9sh9b9
Pity it destroyed sweet fuck all satellites.
Russia conducted a direct-ascent hit-to-kill anti-satellite (ASAT)
test on November 15, 2021, striking a Russian satellite and rendering >>>>> it into more than 1,500 pieces of orbital debris.
And had sweet fuck all effect on other satellites.
A nuclear warPossibly be the very first causalities. To prevent return missile >>>>>>> targeting.
Mindlessly pig ignorant. INS alone is all you need to nuke missiles. >>>>
Not gunna happen, you watch.
will be quick with a number of possibilities!
1st
<https://www.britannica.com/science/nuclear-electromagnetic-pulse>
knoces out communication radar cars aircraft
BULLSHIT.
For a high-yield explosion of approximately 10 megatons detonated 320
km (200 miles) above the centre of the continental United States,
almost the entire country, as well as parts of Mexico and Canada,
would be affected by EMP—destroying practically all electronic devices >>> and electrical transformers.
like that effect with the atmospheric tests.
Yeah we did.
Check the data from many many years of atmospheric research missiles
fired almost daily from Point Mugu.
Point Mugu, CA | NAVAIR - Naval Air Systems Command
Point Mugu was established in 1946 as the Navy's first instrumented
missile test sea range. It offers enormous geographic diversity: vast
ocean, deep water ports, protected islands within...
On 2/14/2023 9:57 PM, Rod Speed wrote:
On Wed, 15 Feb 2023 13:38:28 +1100, Leper <Leper@malokaicolony.com>
wrote:
On 2/14/2023 10:55 AM, Rod Speed wrote:BULLSHIT. They have that for when they lose communication
On Tue, 14 Feb 2023 22:29:43 +1100, Leper <Leper@malokaicolony.com>
wrote:
On 2/13/2023 5:22 PM, Peter Jason wrote:Yep, there will never be a full nuclear holocaust and even
On Tue, 14 Feb 2023 07:18:14 +1100, "Rod Speed"
<rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, 14 Feb 2023 06:59:52 +1100, Peter Jason <pj@jostle.com>That is true. But the cost and queuing would slow things down to >>>>>> a
wrote:
On Mon, 13 Feb 2023 05:18:36 -0000 (UTC), J D Young
<jdyoung2@ymail.com> wrote:
SYDNEY (Reuters) - Australia said on Monday it would accelerate >>>>>>>>> plans to
buy advanced sea mines to protect its maritime routes and ports >>>>>>>>> from
"potential aggressors" amid China's plans to increase its
influence in
the
Pacific region.
Laudable. But will they also be placed along the length of
submarine
cables which could be cut by some enemy, in many locations, so >>>>>>>> isolating Oz from the rest of the world?
Even if all the submarine cables were all cut in multiple places, >>>>>>> we would not be isolated from the rest of the world due to
satellites.
crawl. Presumably use would be rationed to the benefit of we
posters
in aus.politics.
But in times of a real war, would those Satellites survive the first >>>>> few hours?
if there was, it would never be possible to take out all the
satellites anyway.
Possibly be the very first causalities. To prevent return missileMindlessly pig ignorant. INS alone is all you need to nuke missiles.
targeting.
Not a lot of our birds are on INS.
with the satellites, stupid. The accuracy need for a NUKE ICBM
is perfectly adequate with INS.
We stopped designing those in the 70's or 80'sThere have been sweet fuck all new nuke
icbms produced since then except by China.
and have used less of the old designs for our systems.Whose systems ?
We still have Subs that have to set positions before firing.But most don't.
But not very many have to do that.So the dregs like that are irrelevant.
Most of the very best manufacturers(researchers) are long gone. i.eBut the sub launched nukes haven't.
Autonetics INS, Hughs INS Division, Raytheon etc.
I still have a tytac of the best one with all moving parts. A NuclearIrrelevant, those aren't nuke icbms.
screen in the early days was the tactical answer to both incoming
ICBM's and blocking/destroying satellite targeting. I understand the
planners are thinking the same tactics to stop Drone Swarms.
If and when the SHTF, you will find me in the back yard BBQing aAnd INS is all it needs to put a nuke where
brisket and imbibing of my favorite drink. I am sure the girls will be
perusing their bibles. I am sure you are aware of the targeting system
in the Minuteman system? We put that bird active in about 1962 and it
has many upgrades since. But it is one of our reliable solid repellent
go-to birds.
it matters if there is no alternative left.
You did note that the balloon killers we sent out were heat seekers.Obviously the payload does that, that's why it has solar panels,
Which means all of those bogies were producing heat in order to be hit.
stupid.
China has plans to step up its presence in the Pacific and
entered a
security pact with Solomon Islands last year, raising concerns >>>>>>>>> in the
United States and Australia, who for decades have seen the
region as
their
sphere of influence.
Australia has been looking to boost its defence spending over >>>>>>>>> the past
few
years, including entering into a deal in 2021 to buy nuclear >>>>>>>>> submarines
from the United States and Britain.
($1 = 1.4323 Australian dollars)
(Reporting by Renju Jose. Editing by Gerry Doyle)
https://news.yahoo.com/australia-speed-purchase-sea-mines-034254381.html
Yawnnnn..... End of communications with you.
On 2/15/2023 2:48 AM, Governor Swill wrote:
On Tue, 14 Feb 2023 20:40:57 -0600, Leper <Le...@MalokaiColony.com> wrote:
America researched and designed a multiple laser to kill satellites.
Many years ago. Never heard how it turned out. Never heard that it was
operational.
That's not the sort of thing Defense is going to be broadcasting the details of.
SwillWhy not? After all we have Politicians and high ranking Generals that
blab their tiny brains out to foreign entities on a regular basis.
Hell we even have assholes like Kerry and the General that make foreign policy that is detriment to America. One General even alleged threat he would countermand a Presidential Launch order. That SOB is still walking around free. Clinton even gave China our secret technology to keep
ICBM's from broaching at launch. Obama published the name of seal team
six and its members that assassinated Bin Laden. Most of that team is
now dead.
--
Welcome to reality. Enjoy your visit!
Heroyam slava! Glory to the Heroes!
Sláva UkrajĂni! Glory to Ukraine!
On 2/15/2023 2:48 AM, Governor Swill wrote:
On Tue, 14 Feb 2023 20:40:57 -0600, Leper <Leper@MalokaiColony.com> wrote: >>
America researched and designed a multiple laser to kill satellites.
Many years ago. Never heard how it turned out. Never heard that it was
operational.
That's not the sort of thing Defense is going to be broadcasting the details of.
Swill
Why not? After all we have Politicians and high ranking Generals that
blab their tiny brains out to foreign entities on a regular basis.
Hell we even have assholes like Kerry and the General that make foreign >policy that is detriment to America. One General even alleged threat he
would countermand a Presidential Launch order.
That SOB is still walking around free.
Clinton even gave China our secret technology to keep
ICBM's from broaching at launch.
Obama published the name of seal team
six and its members that assassinated Bin Laden. Most of that team is
now dead.
On Sun, 26 Feb 2023 23:19:57 -0600, Leper <Leper@MalokaiColony.com> wrote:
On 2/15/2023 2:48 AM, Governor Swill wrote:
On Tue, 14 Feb 2023 20:40:57 -0600, Leper <Leper@MalokaiColony.com> wrote: >>>
America researched and designed a multiple laser to kill satellites.
Many years ago. Never heard how it turned out. Never heard that it was >>>> operational.
That's not the sort of thing Defense is going to be broadcasting the details of.
Swill
Why not? After all we have Politicians and high ranking Generals that
blab their tiny brains out to foreign entities on a regular basis.
Like Trump blabbing to Pootin'?
Hell we even have assholes like Kerry and the General that make foreign
policy that is detriment to America. One General even alleged threat he
would countermand a Presidential Launch order.
"alleged" Was that for a first strike or response?
That SOB is still walking around free.
Good. No point sending someone to gulag over an allegation.
Clinton even gave China our secret technology to keep
ICBM's from broaching at launch.
B . . . but . . . but CLINTON!
Obama published the name of seal team
six and its members that assassinated Bin Laden. Most of that team is
now dead.
More bullshit from the freak.
What color is the sky on your planet?
Slops
On Monday, February 27, 2023 at 12:19:56 AM UTC-5, Leper wrote:
On 2/15/2023 2:48 AM, Governor Swill wrote:
On Tue, 14 Feb 2023 20:40:57 -0600, Leper <Le...@MalokaiColony.com> wrote: >>>Why not? After all we have Politicians and high ranking Generals that
America researched and designed a multiple laser to kill satellites.
Many years ago. Never heard how it turned out. Never heard that it was >>>> operational.
That's not the sort of thing Defense is going to be broadcasting the details of.
Swill
blab their tiny brains out to foreign entities on a regular basis.
Hell we even have assholes like Kerry and the General that make foreign
policy that is detriment to America. One General even alleged threat he
would countermand a Presidential Launch order. That SOB is still walking
around free. Clinton even gave China our secret technology to keep
ICBM's from broaching at launch. Obama published the name of seal team
six and its members that assassinated Bin Laden. Most of that team is
now dead.
--
Welcome to reality. Enjoy your visit!
Heroyam slava! Glory to the Heroes!
Sláva UkrajĂni! Glory to Ukraine!
Uh yeah, that's a bit of a stretch blaming Obama for most of Seal Team Six being dead. They were killed in a helicopter crash that had nothing to do Obama.
On Sun, 26 Feb 2023 22:56:14 -0600, Leper <Leper@MalokaiColony.com>
I agree. EMP would definitely kill an INS guidance as they are now aChina will be targeted by BOTH the U.S.A and Russia
solid state electronics device. We stop mechanical INS back in the late
50's and 60's. Shielding might help some, but we decided long ago that
it was a losing solution.
Will be over with no survivors worldwide in minutes!
Leper <Leper@MalokaiColony.com> wrote in
news:tthehq$36euq$3@dont-email.me:
On 2/15/2023 2:48 AM, Governor Swill wrote:
On Tue, 14 Feb 2023 20:40:57 -0600, Leper <Leper@MalokaiColony.com>
wrote:
America researched and designed a multiple laser to kill satellites.
Many years ago. Never heard how it turned out. Never heard that it
was operational.
That's not the sort of thing Defense is going to be broadcasting the
details of.
Swill
Why not? After all we have Politicians and high ranking Generals that
blab their tiny brains out to foreign entities on a regular basis.
Hell we even have assholes like Kerry and the General that make
foreign policy that is detriment to America. One General even alleged
threat he would countermand a Presidential Launch order. That SOB is
still walking around free. Clinton even gave China our secret
technology to keep ICBM's from broaching at launch. Obama published
the name of seal team six and its members that assassinated Bin Laden.
Most of that team is now dead.
Milley needs to be burned alive in front of the Washington monument.
--
Welcome to reality. Enjoy your visit!
Heroyam slava! Glory to the Heroes!
Sláva UkrajĂni! Glory to Ukraine!
On Mon, 27 Feb 2023 16:24:10 +1100, Leper <Leper@malokaicolony.com> wrote:
On 2/14/2023 9:57 PM, Rod Speed wrote:
On Wed, 15 Feb 2023 13:38:28 +1100, Leper <Leper@malokaicolony.com>
wrote:
On 2/14/2023 10:55 AM, Rod Speed wrote:Â BULLSHIT. They have that for when they lose communication
On Tue, 14 Feb 2023 22:29:43 +1100, Leper <Leper@malokaicolony.com>Not a lot of our birds are on INS.
wrote:
On 2/13/2023 5:22 PM, Peter Jason wrote:Â Yep, there will never be a full nuclear holocaust and even
On Tue, 14 Feb 2023 07:18:14 +1100, "Rod Speed"
<rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, 14 Feb 2023 06:59:52 +1100, Peter Jason <pj@jostle.com> >>>>>>>> wrote: That is true. But the cost and queuing would slow things down >>>>>>> to a
On Mon, 13 Feb 2023 05:18:36 -0000 (UTC), J D Young
<jdyoung2@ymail.com> wrote:
SYDNEY (Reuters) - Australia said on Monday it would
accelerate plans to
buy advanced sea mines to protect its maritime routes and
ports from
"potential aggressors" amid China's plans to increase its
influence in
the
Pacific region.
Laudable. But will they also be placed along the length of >>>>>>>>> submarine
cables which could be cut by some enemy, in many locations, so >>>>>>>>> isolating Oz from the rest of the world?
Even if all the submarine cables were all cut in multiple places, >>>>>>>> we would not be isolated from the rest of the world due to
satellites.
crawl. Presumably use would be rationed to the benefit of we
posters
in aus.politics.
But in times of a real war, would those Satellites survive the
first few hours?
if there was, it would never be possible to take out all the
satellites anyway.
Possibly be the very first causalities. To prevent return missile Mindlessly pig ignorant. INS alone is all you need to nuke missiles. >>>
targeting.
with the satellites, stupid. The accuracy need for a NUKE ICBM
is perfectly adequate with INS.
We stopped designing those in the 70's or 80's There have been sweet fuck all new nuke
icbms produced since then except by China.
and have used less of the old designs for our systems. Whose systems ?
We still have Subs that have to set positions before firing. But most don't.
But not very many have to do that. So the dregs like that are irrelevant.
Most of the very best manufacturers(researchers) are long gone. i.e But the sub launched nukes haven't.
Autonetics INS, Hughs INS Division, Raytheon etc.
I still have a tytac of the best one with all moving parts. AÂ Irrelevant, those aren't nuke icbms.
Nuclear screen in the early days was the tactical answer to both
incoming ICBM's and blocking/destroying satellite targeting. I
understand the planners are thinking the same tactics to stop Drone
Swarms.
If and when the SHTF, you will find me in the back yard BBQing a And INS is all it needs to put a nuke where
brisket and imbibing of my favorite drink. I am sure the girls will
be perusing their bibles. I am sure you are aware of the targeting
system in the Minuteman system? We put that bird active in about
1962 and it has many upgrades since. But it is one of our reliable
solid repellent go-to birds.
it matters if there is no alternative left.
You did note that the balloon killers we sent out were heat seekers.stupid.
Which means all of those bogies were producing heat in order to be hit. >>> Â Obviously the payload does that, that's why it has solar panels,
China has plans to step up its presence in the Pacific and >>>>>>>>>> entered a
security pact with Solomon Islands last year, raising concerns >>>>>>>>>> in the
United States and Australia, who for decades have seen the >>>>>>>>>> region as
their
sphere of influence.
Australia has been looking to boost its defence spending over >>>>>>>>>> the past
few
years, including entering into a deal in 2021 to buy nuclear >>>>>>>>>> submarines
from the United States and Britain.
($1 = 1.4323 Australian dollars)
(Reporting by Renju Jose. Editing by Gerry Doyle)
https://news.yahoo.com/australia-speed-purchase-sea-mines-034254381.html
Yawnnnn..... End of communications with you.
Wota stunning line in rational argument you have there, child.
On 2/26/2023 11:23 PM, Petzl wrote:
On Sun, 26 Feb 2023 22:56:14 -0600, Leper <Leper@MalokaiColony.com>
I agree. EMP would definitely kill an INS guidance as they are now aChina will be targeted by BOTH the U.S.A and Russia
solid state electronics device. We stop mechanical INS back in the late
50's and 60's. Shielding might help some, but we decided long ago that
it was a losing solution.
Will be over with no survivors worldwide in minutes!
Why would Russia stike China, when Russia depends on China purchasing
enough oil etc to keep the Russian economy afloat? Not to mention that
China and Russian have a mutual defense pact.
On 2/26/2023 11:23 PM, Petzl wrote:
On Sun, 26 Feb 2023 22:56:14 -0600, Leper <Leper@MalokaiColony.com>
I agree. EMP would definitely kill an INS guidance as they are now aChina will be targeted by BOTH the U.S.A and Russia
solid state electronics device. We stop mechanical INS back in the late
50's and 60's. Shielding might help some, but we decided long ago that
it was a losing solution.
Will be over with no survivors worldwide in minutes!
Why would Russia stike China, when Russia depends on China purchasing
enough oil etc to keep the Russian economy afloat?
Not to mention that China and Russian have a mutual defense pact.
On 2/27/2023 1:36 AM, %% wrote:
On Mon, 27 Feb 2023 16:24:10 +1100, Leper <Leper@malokaicolony.com>
wrote:
On 2/14/2023 9:57 PM, Rod Speed wrote:Wota stunning line in rational argument you have there, child.
On Wed, 15 Feb 2023 13:38:28 +1100, Leper <Leper@malokaicolony.com>
wrote:
On 2/14/2023 10:55 AM, Rod Speed wrote:BULLSHIT. They have that for when they lose communication
On Tue, 14 Feb 2023 22:29:43 +1100, Leper <Leper@malokaicolony.com> >>>>>> wrote:
On 2/13/2023 5:22 PM, Peter Jason wrote:Yep, there will never be a full nuclear holocaust and even
On Tue, 14 Feb 2023 07:18:14 +1100, "Rod Speed"
<rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, 14 Feb 2023 06:59:52 +1100, Peter Jason <pj@jostle.com> >>>>>>>>> wrote:That is true. But the cost and queuing would slow things down >>>>>>>> to a
On Mon, 13 Feb 2023 05:18:36 -0000 (UTC), J D Young
<jdyoung2@ymail.com> wrote:
SYDNEY (Reuters) - Australia said on Monday it would
accelerate plans to
buy advanced sea mines to protect its maritime routes and >>>>>>>>>>> ports from
"potential aggressors" amid China's plans to increase its >>>>>>>>>>> influence in
the
Pacific region.
Laudable. But will they also be placed along the length of >>>>>>>>>> submarine
cables which could be cut by some enemy, in many locations, so >>>>>>>>>> isolating Oz from the rest of the world?
Even if all the submarine cables were all cut in multiple places, >>>>>>>>> we would not be isolated from the rest of the world due to
satellites.
crawl. Presumably use would be rationed to the benefit of we
posters
in aus.politics.
But in times of a real war, would those Satellites survive the
first few hours?
if there was, it would never be possible to take out all the
satellites anyway.
Possibly be the very first causalities. To prevent return missile >>>>>>> targeting.Mindlessly pig ignorant. INS alone is all you need to nuke
missiles.
Not a lot of our birds are on INS.
with the satellites, stupid. The accuracy need for a NUKE ICBM
is perfectly adequate with INS.
We stopped designing those in the 70's or 80'sThere have been sweet fuck all new nuke
icbms produced since then except by China.
and have used less of the old designs for our systems.Whose systems ?
We still have Subs that have to set positions before firing.But most don't.
But not very many have to do that.So the dregs like that are irrelevant.
Most of the very best manufacturers(researchers) are long gone. i.eBut the sub launched nukes haven't.
Autonetics INS, Hughs INS Division, Raytheon etc.
I still have a tytac of the best one with all moving parts. AIrrelevant, those aren't nuke icbms.
Nuclear screen in the early days was the tactical answer to both
incoming ICBM's and blocking/destroying satellite targeting. I
understand the planners are thinking the same tactics to stop Drone
Swarms.
If and when the SHTF, you will find me in the back yard BBQing aAnd INS is all it needs to put a nuke where
brisket and imbibing of my favorite drink. I am sure the girls will
be perusing their bibles. I am sure you are aware of the targeting
system in the Minuteman system? We put that bird active in about
1962 and it has many upgrades since. But it is one of our reliable
solid repellent go-to birds.
it matters if there is no alternative left.
You did note that the balloon killers we sent out were heat seekers. >>>>> Which means all of those bogies were producing heat in order to beObviously the payload does that, that's why it has solar panels,
hit.
stupid.
China has plans to step up its presence in the Pacific and >>>>>>>>>>> entered a
security pact with Solomon Islands last year, raising concerns >>>>>>>>>>> in the
United States and Australia, who for decades have seen the >>>>>>>>>>> region as
their
sphere of influence.
Australia has been looking to boost its defence spending over >>>>>>>>>>> the past
few
years, including entering into a deal in 2021 to buy nuclear >>>>>>>>>>> submarines
from the United States and Britain.
($1 = 1.4323 Australian dollars)
(Reporting by Renju Jose. Editing by Gerry Doyle)
https://news.yahoo.com/australia-speed-purchase-sea-mines-034254381.html
Yawnnnn..... End of communications with you.
Nothing rational there.
On Tue, 28 Feb 2023 03:04:03 -0600, Leper <Leper@MalokaiColony.com>
wrote:
On 2/26/2023 11:23 PM, Petzl wrote:The scene instantly changes in a Russia/USA nuclear response.
On Sun, 26 Feb 2023 22:56:14 -0600, Leper <Leper@MalokaiColony.com>
I agree. EMP would definitely kill an INS guidance as they are now aChina will be targeted by BOTH the U.S.A and Russia
solid state electronics device. We stop mechanical INS back in the
late
50's and 60's. Shielding might help some, but we decided long ago that >>>> it was a losing solution.
Will be over with no survivors worldwide in minutes!
Why would Russia stike China, when Russia depends on China purchasing
enough oil etc to keep the Russian economy afloat? Not to mention that
China and Russian have a mutual defense pact.
There is no time to second guess, the response has already been
determined Just becomes a M.A.D situation, your death is accepted and
so is everyone else's! No winners!
beg for Euthanasia.
On Tue, 28 Feb 2023 23:14:31 +1100, Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, 28 Feb 2023 03:04:03 -0600, Leper <Leper@MalokaiColony.com>
wrote:
On 2/26/2023 11:23 PM, Petzl wrote:The scene instantly changes in a Russia/USA nuclear response.
On Sun, 26 Feb 2023 22:56:14 -0600, Leper <Leper@MalokaiColony.com>
I agree. EMP would definitely kill an INS guidance as they are now a >>>>> solid state electronics device. We stop mechanical INS back in theChina will be targeted by BOTH the U.S.A and Russia
late
50's and 60's. Shielding might help some, but we decided long ago that >>>>> it was a losing solution.
Will be over with no survivors worldwide in minutes!
Why would Russia stike China, when Russia depends on China purchasing
enough oil etc to keep the Russian economy afloat? Not to mention that
China and Russian have a mutual defense pact.
There is no time to second guess, the response has already been
determined Just becomes a M.A.D situation, your death is accepted and
so is everyone else's! No winners!
There will always be plenty of survivors. It isnt actually physically >possible kill everyone even if all nukes are launched and most
make it to their targets.
On Wed, 01 Mar 2023 05:14:52 +1100, "Rod Speed"
<rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, 28 Feb 2023 23:14:31 +1100, Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, 28 Feb 2023 03:04:03 -0600, Leper <Leper@MalokaiColony.com>
wrote:
On 2/26/2023 11:23 PM, Petzl wrote:The scene instantly changes in a Russia/USA nuclear response.
On Sun, 26 Feb 2023 22:56:14 -0600, Leper <Leper@MalokaiColony.com>
I agree. EMP would definitely kill an INS guidance as they are now a >>>>>> solid state electronics device. We stop mechanical INS back in the >>>>>> lateChina will be targeted by BOTH the U.S.A and Russia
50's and 60's. Shielding might help some, but we decided long ago
that
it was a losing solution.
Will be over with no survivors worldwide in minutes!
Why would Russia stike China, when Russia depends on China purchasing
enough oil etc to keep the Russian economy afloat? Not to mention that >>>> China and Russian have a mutual defense pact.
There is no time to second guess, the response has already been
determined Just becomes a M.A.D situation, your death is accepted and
so is everyone else's! No winners!
There will always be plenty of survivors. It isnt actually physically
possible kill everyone even if all nukes are launched and most
make it to their targets.
Not only the bombing it's the aftermath of M.A.D!
For those unlucky in not dying <https://www.sciencefocus.com/future-technology/what-would-happen-if-all-the-nuclear-bombs-were-detonated/>
https://tinyurl.com/2e6mavzt
The huge volume of debris injected into the atmosphere would have far
more widespread effects. This â€aerosol’ of particles would reduce the amount of heat reaching the surface from the Sun, producing a
so-called nuclear winter with huge environmental impact.
The nuclear
explosion would also unleash a pulse of electromagnetic energy that
would wreck everything from national power grids to microchips around
the world.
The scene instantly changes in a Russia/USA nuclear response.China will be targeted by BOTH the U.S.A and Russia
Will be over with no survivors worldwide in minutes!
Why would Russia stike China, when Russia depends on China purchasing >>>>> enough oil etc to keep the Russian economy afloat? Not to mention that >>>>> China and Russian have a mutual defense pact.
There is no time to second guess, the response has already been
determined Just becomes a M.A.D situation, your death is accepted and
so is everyone else's! No winners!
There will always be plenty of survivors. It isnt actually physically
possible kill everyone even if all nukes are launched and most
make it to their targets.
Not only the bombing it's the aftermath of M.A.D!
Not going to kill everyone.
For those unlucky in not dying
<https://www.sciencefocus.com/future-technology/what-would-happen-if-all-the-nuclear-bombs-were-detonated/>
https://tinyurl.com/2e6mavzt
The huge volume of debris injected into the atmosphere would have far
more widespread effects. This ‘aerosol’ of particles would reduce the
amount of heat reaching the surface from the Sun, producing a
so-called nuclear winter with huge environmental impact.
But still wouldnt kill everyone in the southern hemisphere.
The nuclear
explosion would also unleash a pulse of electromagnetic energy that
would wreck everything from national power grids to microchips around
the world.
That last is complete and utter mindless pig ignorant bullshit.
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
The scene instantly changes in a Russia/USA nuclear response.China will be targeted by BOTH the U.S.A and Russia
Will be over with no survivors worldwide in minutes!
Why would Russia stike China, when Russia depends on China
purchasing
enough oil etc to keep the Russian economy afloat? Not to mention
that
China and Russian have a mutual defense pact.
There is no time to second guess, the response has already been
determined Just becomes a M.A.D situation, your death is accepted and >>>>> so is everyone else's! No winners!
There will always be plenty of survivors. It isnt actually physically
possible kill everyone even if all nukes are launched and most
make it to their targets.
Not only the bombing it's the aftermath of M.A.D!
Not going to kill everyone.
Not what the science states for a full scale nuclear attack,
where all
"19,000 nuclear warheads" are fired from land, sea and aircraft within minutes of each other. Followed up by Submarine'
That is what the nuclear footballs will demands, Putin even takes his
to the shitter, Biden wouldn't know where his is?
For those unlucky in not dying
<https://www.sciencefocus.com/future-technology/what-would-happen-if-all-the-nuclear-bombs-were-detonated/>
https://tinyurl.com/2e6mavzt
The huge volume of debris injected into the atmosphere would have far
more widespread effects. This â€aerosol’ of particles would reduce the >>> amount of heat reaching the surface from the Sun, producing a
so-called nuclear winter with huge environmental impact.
But still wouldnt kill everyone in the southern hemisphere.
It will be nuked also,
there are submarines
and warships with nuclear
weapons in the southern hemisphere.
There will be no safe harbour's
for them.
The nuclear
explosion would also unleash a pulse of electromagnetic energy that
would wreck everything from national power grids to microchips around
the world.
That last is complete and utter mindless pig ignorant bullshit.
Written by Nuclear scientists with doctorates?
On Tue, 28 Feb 2023 03:04:03 -0600, Leper <Leper@MalokaiColony.com>
wrote:
On 2/26/2023 11:23 PM, Petzl wrote:
On Sun, 26 Feb 2023 22:56:14 -0600, Leper <Leper@MalokaiColony.com>
I agree. EMP would definitely kill an INS guidance as they are now aChina will be targeted by BOTH the U.S.A and Russia
solid state electronics device. We stop mechanical INS back in the late >>>> 50's and 60's. Shielding might help some, but we decided long ago that >>>> it was a losing solution.
Will be over with no survivors worldwide in minutes!
Why would Russia stike China, when Russia depends on China purchasing
enough oil etc to keep the Russian economy afloat? Not to mention that
China and Russian have a mutual defense pact.
The scene instantly changes in a Russia/USA nuclear response.
There is no time to second guess, the response has already been
determined Just becomes a M.A.D situation, your death is accepted and
so is everyone else's! No winners!
On Tue, 28 Feb 2023 20:04:03 +1100, Leper <Leper@malokaicolony.com> wrote:
On 2/26/2023 11:23 PM, Petzl wrote:
On Sun, 26 Feb 2023 22:56:14 -0600, Leper <Leper@MalokaiColony.com>
I agree. EMP would definitely kill an INS guidance as they are now aChina will be targeted by BOTH the U.S.A and Russia
solid state electronics device. We stop mechanical INS back in the late >>>> 50's and 60's. Shielding might help some, but we decided long ago that >>>> it was a losing solution.
Will be over with no survivors worldwide in minutes!
Why would Russia strike China, when Russia depends on China purchasing
enough oil etc to keep the Russian economy afloat?
Not to mention that China and Russian have a mutual defense pact.
Like hell they do. And Russia and Germany agreed not to attack each other
at one time and a fat lot of use that was when Adolf attacked anyway.
On Tue, 28 Feb 2023 20:12:55 +1100, Leper <Leper@malokaicolony.com> wrote:
On 2/27/2023 1:36 AM, %% wrote:
On Mon, 27 Feb 2023 16:24:10 +1100, Leper <Leper@malokaicolony.com>
wrote:
On 2/14/2023 9:57 PM, Rod Speed wrote:Â Wota stunning line in rational argument you have there, child.
On Wed, 15 Feb 2023 13:38:28 +1100, Leper <Leper@malokaicolony.com>
wrote:
On 2/14/2023 10:55 AM, Rod Speed wrote:Â BULLSHIT. They have that for when they lose communication
On Tue, 14 Feb 2023 22:29:43 +1100, Leper
<Leper@malokaicolony.com> wrote:
On 2/13/2023 5:22 PM, Peter Jason wrote:Â Yep, there will never be a full nuclear holocaust and even
On Tue, 14 Feb 2023 07:18:14 +1100, "Rod Speed"
<rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, 14 Feb 2023 06:59:52 +1100, Peter Jason That is true. But the cost and queuing would slow things >>>>>>>>> down to a
<pj@jostle.com> wrote:
On Mon, 13 Feb 2023 05:18:36 -0000 (UTC), J D Young
<jdyoung2@ymail.com> wrote:
SYDNEY (Reuters) - Australia said on Monday it would
accelerate plans to
buy advanced sea mines to protect its maritime routes and >>>>>>>>>>>> ports from
"potential aggressors" amid China's plans to increase its >>>>>>>>>>>> influence in
the
Pacific region.
Laudable. But will they also be placed along the length of >>>>>>>>>>> submarine
cables which could be cut by some enemy, in many locations, so >>>>>>>>>>> isolating Oz from the rest of the world?
Even if all the submarine cables were all cut in multiple places, >>>>>>>>>> we would not be isolated from the rest of the world due to >>>>>>>>>> satellites.
crawl. Presumably use would be rationed to the benefit of we >>>>>>>>> posters
in aus.politics.
But in times of a real war, would those Satellites survive the >>>>>>>> first few hours?
if there was, it would never be possible to take out all the
satellites anyway.
Possibly be the very first causalities. To prevent return Mindlessly pig ignorant. INS alone is all you need to nuke
missile targeting.
missiles.
Not a lot of our birds are on INS.
with the satellites, stupid. The accuracy need for a NUKE ICBM
is perfectly adequate with INS.
We stopped designing those in the 70's or 80's There have been sweet fuck all new nuke
icbms produced since then except by China.
and have used less of the old designs for our systems. Whose systems ?
We still have Subs that have to set positions before firing. But most don't.
But not very many have to do that. So the dregs like that are irrelevant.
Most of the very best manufacturers(researchers) are long gone. But the sub launched nukes haven't.
i.e Autonetics INS, Hughs INS Division, Raytheon etc.
I still have a tytac of the best one with all moving parts. AÂ Irrelevant, those aren't nuke icbms.
Nuclear screen in the early days was the tactical answer to both
incoming ICBM's and blocking/destroying satellite targeting. I
understand the planners are thinking the same tactics to stop
Drone Swarms.
If and when the SHTF, you will find me in the back yard BBQing a And INS is all it needs to put a nuke where
brisket and imbibing of my favorite drink. I am sure the girls
will be perusing their bibles. I am sure you are aware of the
targeting system in the Minuteman system? We put that bird active
in about 1962 and it has many upgrades since. But it is one of our >>>>>> reliable solid repellent go-to birds.
it matters if there is no alternative left.
You did note that the balloon killers we sent out were heat Obviously the payload does that, that's why it has solar panels,
seekers. Which means all of those bogies were producing heat in
order to be hit.
stupid.
China has plans to step up its presence in the Pacific and >>>>>>>>>>>> entered a
security pact with Solomon Islands last year, raising
concerns in the
United States and Australia, who for decades have seen the >>>>>>>>>>>> region as
their
sphere of influence.
Australia has been looking to boost its defence spending >>>>>>>>>>>> over the past
few
years, including entering into a deal in 2021 to buy nuclear >>>>>>>>>>>> submarines
from the United States and Britain.
($1 = 1.4323 Australian dollars)
(Reporting by Renju Jose. Editing by Gerry Doyle)
https://news.yahoo.com/australia-speed-purchase-sea-mines-034254381.html
Yawnnnn..... End of communications with you.
Nothing rational there.
What I said, fuckwit child.
<reams of your shit any 2 year old could leave for dead flushed where it belongs>
On 2/28/2023 12:04 PM, %% wrote:
On Tue, 28 Feb 2023 20:04:03 +1100, Leper <Leper@malokaicolony.com>
wrote:
On 2/26/2023 11:23 PM, Petzl wrote:Like hell they do. And Russia and Germany agreed not to attack each
On Sun, 26 Feb 2023 22:56:14 -0600, Leper <Leper@MalokaiColony.com>
I agree. EMP would definitely kill an INS guidance as they are now a >>>>> solid state electronics device. We stop mechanical INS back in theChina will be targeted by BOTH the U.S.A and Russia
late
50's and 60's. Shielding might help some, but we decided long ago
that
it was a losing solution.
Will be over with no survivors worldwide in minutes!
Why would Russia strike China, when Russia depends on China purchasing
enough oil etc to keep the Russian economy afloat?
Not to mention that China and Russian have a mutual defense pact.
other
at one time and a fat lot of use that was when Adolf attacked anyway.
Any Nukes in either country would flood both countries and then some.
With the poisonous environment that would drift over the entire region
and much of the planet.
Here in middle America we are still infected with Strontium 90 from
world wide nuclear testing.
It is is Cows milk even today from 1950's tests.
That makes the nuclear game fair and just as everyone loses.
check out the area in Russia that has been abandoned
and now researchers can spend a couple of hours a week or whatever to
check out plant and animal resurgence since being affkicted with nuclear poisons
On 2/28/2023 12:07 PM, %% wrote:
On Tue, 28 Feb 2023 20:12:55 +1100, Leper <Leper@malokaicolony.com>
wrote:
On 2/27/2023 1:36 AM, %% wrote:
On Mon, 27 Feb 2023 16:24:10 +1100, Leper <Leper@malokaicolony.com>
wrote:
On 2/14/2023 9:57 PM, Rod Speed wrote:Wota stunning line in rational argument you have there, child.
On Wed, 15 Feb 2023 13:38:28 +1100, Leper <Leper@malokaicolony.com> >>>>>> wrote:
On 2/14/2023 10:55 AM, Rod Speed wrote:BULLSHIT. They have that for when they lose communication
On Tue, 14 Feb 2023 22:29:43 +1100, Leper
<Leper@malokaicolony.com> wrote:
On 2/13/2023 5:22 PM, Peter Jason wrote:Yep, there will never be a full nuclear holocaust and even
On Tue, 14 Feb 2023 07:18:14 +1100, "Rod Speed"
<rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, 14 Feb 2023 06:59:52 +1100, Peter JasonThat is true. But the cost and queuing would slow things >>>>>>>>>> down to a
<pj@jostle.com> wrote:
On Mon, 13 Feb 2023 05:18:36 -0000 (UTC), J D Young
<jdyoung2@ymail.com> wrote:
SYDNEY (Reuters) - Australia said on Monday it would >>>>>>>>>>>>> accelerate plans to
buy advanced sea mines to protect its maritime routes and >>>>>>>>>>>>> ports from
"potential aggressors" amid China's plans to increase its >>>>>>>>>>>>> influence in
the
Pacific region.
Laudable. But will they also be placed along the length of >>>>>>>>>>>> submarine
cables which could be cut by some enemy, in many locations, so >>>>>>>>>>>> isolating Oz from the rest of the world?
Even if all the submarine cables were all cut in multiple >>>>>>>>>>> places,
we would not be isolated from the rest of the world due to >>>>>>>>>>> satellites.
crawl. Presumably use would be rationed to the benefit of we >>>>>>>>>> posters
in aus.politics.
But in times of a real war, would those Satellites survive the >>>>>>>>> first few hours?
if there was, it would never be possible to take out all the
satellites anyway.
Possibly be the very first causalities. To prevent returnMindlessly pig ignorant. INS alone is all you need to nuke
missile targeting.
missiles.
Not a lot of our birds are on INS.
with the satellites, stupid. The accuracy need for a NUKE ICBM
is perfectly adequate with INS.
We stopped designing those in the 70's or 80'sThere have been sweet fuck all new nuke
icbms produced since then except by China.
and have used less of the old designs for our systems.Whose systems ?
We still have Subs that have to set positions before firing.But most don't.
But not very many have to do that.So the dregs like that are irrelevant.
Most of the very best manufacturers(researchers) are long gone.But the sub launched nukes haven't.
i.e Autonetics INS, Hughs INS Division, Raytheon etc.
I still have a tytac of the best one with all moving parts. AIrrelevant, those aren't nuke icbms.
Nuclear screen in the early days was the tactical answer to both >>>>>>> incoming ICBM's and blocking/destroying satellite targeting. I
understand the planners are thinking the same tactics to stop
Drone Swarms.
If and when the SHTF, you will find me in the back yard BBQing a >>>>>>> brisket and imbibing of my favorite drink. I am sure the girlsAnd INS is all it needs to put a nuke where
will be perusing their bibles. I am sure you are aware of the
targeting system in the Minuteman system? We put that bird active >>>>>>> in about 1962 and it has many upgrades since. But it is one of our >>>>>>> reliable solid repellent go-to birds.
it matters if there is no alternative left.
You did note that the balloon killers we sent out were heatObviously the payload does that, that's why it has solar panels,
seekers. Which means all of those bogies were producing heat in
order to be hit.
stupid.
China has plans to step up its presence in the Pacific and >>>>>>>>>>>>> entered a
security pact with Solomon Islands last year, raising >>>>>>>>>>>>> concerns in the
United States and Australia, who for decades have seen the >>>>>>>>>>>>> region as
their
sphere of influence.
Australia has been looking to boost its defence spending >>>>>>>>>>>>> over the past
few
years, including entering into a deal in 2021 to buy nuclear >>>>>>>>>>>>> submarines
from the United States and Britain.
($1 = 1.4323 Australian dollars)
(Reporting by Renju Jose. Editing by Gerry Doyle)
https://news.yahoo.com/australia-speed-purchase-sea-mines-034254381.html
Yawnnnn..... End of communications with you.
Nothing rational there.
What I said, fuckwit child.
Response not acceptable!
On 2/28/2023 6:14 AM, Petzl wrote:
On Tue, 28 Feb 2023 03:04:03 -0600, Leper <Leper@MalokaiColony.com>
wrote:
On 2/26/2023 11:23 PM, Petzl wrote:
On Sun, 26 Feb 2023 22:56:14 -0600, Leper <Leper@MalokaiColony.com>
I agree. EMP would definitely kill an INS guidance as they are now a >>>>> solid state electronics device. We stop mechanical INS back in the late >>>>> 50's and 60's. Shielding might help some, but we decided long ago that >>>>> it was a losing solution.China will be targeted by BOTH the U.S.A and Russia
Will be over with no survivors worldwide in minutes!
Why would Russia stike China, when Russia depends on China purchasing
enough oil etc to keep the Russian economy afloat? Not to mention that
China and Russian have a mutual defense pact.
??? That doesn't seem to make sense.
--The scene instantly changes in a Russia/USA nuclear response.
There is no time to second guess, the response has already been
determined Just becomes a M.A.D situation, your death is accepted and
so is everyone else's! No winners!
On Wed, 1 Mar 2023 18:08:14 -0600, Leper <Leper@MalokaiColony.com>
wrote:
On 2/28/2023 6:14 AM, Petzl wrote:
On Tue, 28 Feb 2023 03:04:03 -0600, Leper <Leper@MalokaiColony.com>
wrote:
On 2/26/2023 11:23 PM, Petzl wrote:
On Sun, 26 Feb 2023 22:56:14 -0600, Leper <Leper@MalokaiColony.com>
I agree. EMP would definitely kill an INS guidance as they are now a >>>>>> solid state electronics device. We stop mechanical INS back in the >>>>>> lateChina will be targeted by BOTH the U.S.A and Russia
50's and 60's. Shielding might help some, but we decided long ago
that
it was a losing solution.
Will be over with no survivors worldwide in minutes!
Why would Russia stike China, when Russia depends on China purchasing
enough oil etc to keep the Russian economy afloat? Not to mention that >>>> China and Russian have a mutual defense pact.
??? That doesn't seem to make sense.
Does it have to?
China is very good friends with the USA
as long as they do what China
tells you to do,
the same for Russia and every one else (as long as
they do what they are told).
If you have a nuclear war contained to surface areas of Russia/USA you
think want China or any other nuclear power to take over the world?
America would be left with sticks and stones to fight off Johnny come lately's
That is what the military think
so if you get involved in M.A.D the
whole world goes.
The scene instantly changes in a Russia/USA nuclear response.
There is no time to second guess, the response has already been
determined Just becomes a M.A.D situation, your death is accepted and
so is everyone else's! No winners!
China is very good friends with the USA
It never is.
China is very good friends with the USA
It never is.
On Thu, 02 Mar 2023 11:26:33 +1100, Leper <Leper@malokaicolony.com> wrote:
On 2/28/2023 12:04 PM, %% wrote:
On Tue, 28 Feb 2023 20:04:03 +1100, Leper <Leper@malokaicolony.com>
wrote:
On 2/26/2023 11:23 PM, Petzl wrote:Â Like hell they do. And Russia and Germany agreed not to attack each
On Sun, 26 Feb 2023 22:56:14 -0600, Leper <Leper@MalokaiColony.com>
I agree. EMP would definitely kill an INS guidance as they are now a >>>>>> solid state electronics device. We stop mechanical INS back in the >>>>>> lateChina will be targeted by BOTH the U.S.A and Russia
50's and 60's. Shielding might help some, but we decided long ago
that
it was a losing solution.
Will be over with no survivors worldwide in minutes!
Why would Russia strike China, when Russia depends on China
purchasing enough oil etc to keep the Russian economy afloat?
Not to mention that China and Russian have a mutual defense pact.
other
at one time and a fat lot of use that was when Adolf attacked anyway.
Any Nukes in either country would flood both countries and then some.
Bullshit.
With the poisonous environment that would drift over the entire region
More mindless pig ignorant bullshit.
and much of the planet.
More mindless pig ignorant bullshit.
Here in middle America we are still infected with Strontium 90 from
world wide nuclear testing.
Not by enough to matter.
It is is Cows milk even today from 1950's tests.
Not by enough to matter.
That makes the nuclear game fair and just as everyone loses.
More mindless pig ignorant bullshit.
check out the area in Russia that has been abandoned
But doesnt need to be, just like Chernobyle doesnt need to be.
and now researchers can spend a couple of hours a week or whatever to
check out plant and animal resurgence since being affkicted with
nuclear poisons
How odd that the plants and animals are doing fine, just like at
Chernobyle.
On 3/1/2023 7:47 PM, %% wrote:
On Thu, 02 Mar 2023 11:26:33 +1100, Leper <Le...@malokaicolony.com> wrote:
On 2/28/2023 12:04 PM, %% wrote:
On Tue, 28 Feb 2023 20:04:03 +1100, Leper <Le...@malokaicolony.com>
wrote:
On 2/26/2023 11:23 PM, Petzl wrote:Like hell they do. And Russia and Germany agreed not to attack each
On Sun, 26 Feb 2023 22:56:14 -0600, Leper <Le...@MalokaiColony.com> >>>>
I agree. EMP would definitely kill an INS guidance as they are now a >>>>>> solid state electronics device. We stop mechanical INS back in the >>>>>> lateChina will be targeted by BOTH the U.S.A and Russia
50's and 60's. Shielding might help some, but we decided long ago >>>>>> that
it was a losing solution.
Will be over with no survivors worldwide in minutes!
Why would Russia strike China, when Russia depends on China
purchasing enough oil etc to keep the Russian economy afloat?
Not to mention that China and Russian have a mutual defense pact.
other
at one time and a fat lot of use that was when Adolf attacked anyway.
Any Nukes in either country would flood both countries and then some.
Bullshit.
With the poisonous environment that would drift over the entire region
More mindless pig ignorant bullshit.
and much of the planet.
More mindless pig ignorant bullshit.
Here in middle America we are still infected with Strontium 90 from
world wide nuclear testing.
Not by enough to matter.
It is is Cows milk even today from 1950's tests.
Not by enough to matter.
That makes the nuclear game fair and just as everyone loses.
More mindless pig ignorant bullshit.
check out the area in Russia that has been abandoned
But doesnt need to be, just like Chernobyle doesnt need to be.
and now researchers can spend a couple of hours a week or whatever to
check out plant and animal resurgence since being affkicted with
nuclear poisons
How odd that the plants and animals are doing fine, just like at Chernobyle.Your migration to live in Chernobyl is acceptable to me. Even the
Russians don't accept that Chernobyl's plant and wild life are doing
nfine. That nuclear infestation at Chernobyl was very minor in
comparison with the purposeful detonation of such real weapons..Nation
to Nation et. al. Your further ignorant posts are now filtered here.
On 3/1/2023 7:47 PM, %% wrote:
On Thu, 02 Mar 2023 11:26:33 +1100, Leper <Leper@malokaicolony.com>
wrote:
On 2/28/2023 12:04 PM, %% wrote:Bullshit.
On Tue, 28 Feb 2023 20:04:03 +1100, Leper <Leper@malokaicolony.com>
wrote:
On 2/26/2023 11:23 PM, Petzl wrote:Like hell they do. And Russia and Germany agreed not to attack each
On Sun, 26 Feb 2023 22:56:14 -0600, Leper <Leper@MalokaiColony.com> >>>>>
I agree. EMP would definitely kill an INS guidance as they are now >>>>>>> aChina will be targeted by BOTH the U.S.A and Russia
solid state electronics device. We stop mechanical INS back in the >>>>>>> late
50's and 60's. Shielding might help some, but we decided long ago >>>>>>> that
it was a losing solution.
Will be over with no survivors worldwide in minutes!
Why would Russia strike China, when Russia depends on China
purchasing enough oil etc to keep the Russian economy afloat?
Not to mention that China and Russian have a mutual defense pact.
other
at one time and a fat lot of use that was when Adolf attacked anyway.
Any Nukes in either country would flood both countries and then some.
With the poisonous environment that would drift over the entire regionMore mindless pig ignorant bullshit.
and much of the planet.More mindless pig ignorant bullshit.
Here in middle America we are still infected with Strontium 90 fromNot by enough to matter.
world wide nuclear testing.
It is is Cows milk even today from 1950's tests.Not by enough to matter.
That makes the nuclear game fair and just as everyone loses.More mindless pig ignorant bullshit.
check out the area in Russia that has been abandonedBut doesnt need to be, just like Chernobyle doesnt need to be.
and now researchers can spend a couple of hours a week or whatever to
check out plant and animal resurgence since being affkicted with
nuclear poisons
How odd that the plants and animals are doing fine, just like at
Chernobyle.
Your migration to live in Chernobyl is acceptable to me.
Even the Russians don't accept that Chernobyl's plant and wild life are
doing nfine.
That nuclear infestation at Chernobyl was very minor in comparison with
the purposeful detonation of such real weapons..Nation to Nation et. al.
On Friday, March 3, 2023 at 4:04:49 AM UTC-5, Leper wrote:
On 3/1/2023 7:47 PM, %% wrote:
On Thu, 02 Mar 2023 11:26:33 +1100, Leper <Le...@malokaicolony.com> wrote: >>>Your migration to live in Chernobyl is acceptable to me. Even the
On 2/28/2023 12:04 PM, %% wrote:
On Tue, 28 Feb 2023 20:04:03 +1100, Leper <Le...@malokaicolony.com>
wrote:
On 2/26/2023 11:23 PM, Petzl wrote:Like hell they do. And Russia and Germany agreed not to attack each >>>>> other
On Sun, 26 Feb 2023 22:56:14 -0600, Leper <Le...@MalokaiColony.com> >>>>>>
I agree. EMP would definitely kill an INS guidance as they are now a >>>>>>>> solid state electronics device. We stop mechanical INS back in the >>>>>>>> lateChina will be targeted by BOTH the U.S.A and Russia
50's and 60's. Shielding might help some, but we decided long ago >>>>>>>> that
it was a losing solution.
Will be over with no survivors worldwide in minutes!
Why would Russia strike China, when Russia depends on China
purchasing enough oil etc to keep the Russian economy afloat?
Not to mention that China and Russian have a mutual defense pact.
at one time and a fat lot of use that was when Adolf attacked anyway.
Any Nukes in either country would flood both countries and then some.
Bullshit.
With the poisonous environment that would drift over the entire region
More mindless pig ignorant bullshit.
and much of the planet.
More mindless pig ignorant bullshit.
Here in middle America we are still infected with Strontium 90 from
world wide nuclear testing.
Not by enough to matter.
It is is Cows milk even today from 1950's tests.
Not by enough to matter.
That makes the nuclear game fair and just as everyone loses.
More mindless pig ignorant bullshit.
check out the area in Russia that has been abandoned
But doesnt need to be, just like Chernobyle doesnt need to be.
and now researchers can spend a couple of hours a week or whatever to
check out plant and animal resurgence since being affkicted with
nuclear poisons
How odd that the plants and animals are doing fine, just like at
Chernobyle.
Russians don't accept that Chernobyl's plant and wild life are doing
nfine. That nuclear infestation at Chernobyl was very minor in
comparison with the purposeful detonation of such real weapons..Nation
to Nation et. al. Your further ignorant posts are now filtered here.
Why would the Russians care? Chernobyl is in Ukraine.
That makes the nuclear game fair and just as everyone loses.More mindless pig ignorant bullshit.
check out the area in Russia that has been abandonedBut doesnt need to be, just like Chernobyle doesnt need to be.
and now researchers can spend a couple of hours a week or whatever to
check out plant and animal resurgence since being affkicted with
nuclear poisons
How odd that the plants and animals are doing fine, just like at
Chernobyle.
Your migration to live in Chernobyl is acceptable to me.
You are pathetic.
Even the Russians don't accept that Chernobyl's plant and wild life are
doing nfine.
BULLSHIT.
--That nuclear infestation at Chernobyl was very minor in comparison with
the purposeful detonation of such real weapons..Nation to Nation et. al.
In article <op.1086zu0ubyq249@pvr2.lan>,
"Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote:
There have been a number of docos showing people illegally
living there and the plants and animals doing fine.
For how long? The background radiation would drop exponentially
util it was no immediate threat. What lasts thousands of years is
dust with radioactive isotopes. When those lodge in a body, they
tickle nearby tissue with alpha particles until they become
cancer. Years later.
On Sat, 04 Mar 2023 08:42:24 +1100, Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, 04 Mar 2023 03:49:57 +1100, chop <chop654@gmail.com> wrote:
That makes the nuclear game fair and just as everyone loses.More mindless pig ignorant bullshit.
check out the area in Russia that has been abandonedBut doesnt need to be, just like Chernobyle doesnt need to be.
and now researchers can spend a couple of hours a week or whatever to >>>>>> check out plant and animal resurgence since being affkicted with
nuclear poisons
How odd that the plants and animals are doing fine, just like at
Chernobyle.
Your migration to live in Chernobyl is acceptable to me.
You are pathetic.
Even the Russians don't accept that Chernobyl's plant and wild life are >>>> doing nfine.
BULLSHIT.
Remember seeing "The Grand Tour" going through Chernobyl, didn't see
anyone living there?
There have been a number of docos showing people illegally
living there and the plants and animals doing fine.
But here's Jeremy Clarkson's take.
https://youtu.be/uTSSmV4QQ4Q
That nuclear infestation at Chernobyl was very minor in comparison with >>>> the purposeful detonation of such real weapons..Nation to Nation et.
al.
There have been a number of docos showing people illegally
living there and the plants and animals doing fine.
On Sat, 04 Mar 2023 03:49:57 +1100, chop <chop654@gmail.com> wrote:
That makes the nuclear game fair and just as everyone loses.More mindless pig ignorant bullshit.
check out the area in Russia that has been abandonedBut doesnt need to be, just like Chernobyle doesnt need to be.
and now researchers can spend a couple of hours a week or whatever to >>>>> check out plant and animal resurgence since being affkicted with
nuclear poisons
How odd that the plants and animals are doing fine, just like at
Chernobyle.
Your migration to live in Chernobyl is acceptable to me.
You are pathetic.
Even the Russians don't accept that Chernobyl's plant and wild life are
doing nfine.
BULLSHIT.
Remember seeing "The Grand Tour" going through Chernobyl, didn't see
anyone living there?
But here's Jeremy Clarkson's take.
https://youtu.be/uTSSmV4QQ4Q
That nuclear infestation at Chernobyl was very minor in comparison with
the purposeful detonation of such real weapons..Nation to Nation et.
al.
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
There have been a number of docos showing people illegally
living there and the plants and animals doing fine.
For how long?
The background radiation would drop exponentially
util it was no immediate threat. What lasts thousands of years is
dust with radioactive isotopes.
When those lodge in a body, they
tickle nearby tissue with alpha particles until they become
cancer. Years later.
In article <op.1086zu0ubyq249@pvr2.lan>,
"Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote:
There have been a number of docos showing people illegally
living there and the plants and animals doing fine.
For how long? The background radiation would drop exponentially
util it was no immediate threat. What lasts thousands of years is
dust with radioactive isotopes. When those lodge in a body, they
tickle nearby tissue with alpha particles until they become
cancer. Years later.
No evidence of any increased cancer rates with any of the animals.
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
No evidence of any increased cancer rates with any of the animals.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20002052/
https://academic.oup.com/jhered/article/105/5/704/2961808
In article <op.1086zu0ubyq249@pvr2.lan>,
"Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote:
There have been a number of docos showing people illegally
living there and the plants and animals doing fine.
For how long? The background radiation would drop exponentially
util it was no immediate threat. What lasts thousands of years is
dust with radioactive isotopes. When those lodge in a body, they
tickle nearby tissue with alpha particles until they become
cancer. Years later.
In article <op.109byop0byq249@pvr2.lan>,
"Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote:
No evidence of any increased cancer rates with any of the animals.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20002052/
https://academic.oup.com/jhered/article/105/5/704/2961808
On 3/3/2023 5:40 PM, Siri Cruise wrote:
In article <op.1086zu0ubyq249@pvr2.lan>,
"Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote:
There have been a number of docos showing people illegally
living there and the plants and animals doing fine.
For how long? The background radiation would drop exponentially
util it was no immediate threat. What lasts thousands of years is
dust with radioactive isotopes. When those lodge in a body, they
tickle nearby tissue with alpha particles until they become
cancer. Years later.
Sssshhh. The elimination of web know-it-alls could be the end result.
There is an old man living at one of the lesser toxic zones of
Chernobyl. His wife and daughter both died of effects of radiation. The >Government has allowed him to live there as a study and he has no
family. There was a full program on American TV a few years ago that
actually filmed the children's toys and household furnishings to
indicate how rapidly and fully the surviving residents fled. The old man
also trapped animals for the scientists to study. Also the plant life.
The Russian Scientists are way ahead of us on those studies. I have
searched the Web for that Documentary, but no luck. I believe it was on
PBS a number of years ago.
On Fri, 3 Mar 2023 23:34:25 -0600, Leper <Leper@MalokaiColony.com>
wrote:
On 3/3/2023 5:40 PM, Siri Cruise wrote:This it? <https://www.pbs.org/newshour/show/the-impact-of-chernobyls-nuclear-disaster-33-years-later>
In article <op.1086zu0ubyq249@pvr2.lan>,
"Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote:
There have been a number of docos showing people illegally
living there and the plants and animals doing fine.
For how long? The background radiation would drop exponentially
util it was no immediate threat. What lasts thousands of years is
dust with radioactive isotopes. When those lodge in a body, they
tickle nearby tissue with alpha particles until they become
cancer. Years later.
Sssshhh. The elimination of web know-it-alls could be the end result.
There is an old man living at one of the lesser toxic zones of
Chernobyl. His wife and daughter both died of effects of radiation. The
Government has allowed him to live there as a study and he has no
family. There was a full program on American TV a few years ago that
actually filmed the children's toys and household furnishings to
indicate how rapidly and fully the surviving residents fled. The old man
also trapped animals for the scientists to study. Also the plant life.
The Russian Scientists are way ahead of us on those studies. I have
searched the Web for that Documentary, but no luck. I believe it was on
PBS a number of years ago.
https://tinyurl.com/yyxr8f4q
The impact of Chernobyl’s nuclear disaster 33 years later
On Sat, 04 Mar 2023 20:02:03 +1100, Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, 3 Mar 2023 23:34:25 -0600, Leper <Leper@MalokaiColony.com>
wrote:
On 3/3/2023 5:40 PM, Siri Cruise wrote:This it?
In article <op.1086zu0ubyq249@pvr2.lan>,
"Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote:
There have been a number of docos showing people illegally
living there and the plants and animals doing fine.
For how long? The background radiation would drop exponentially
util it was no immediate threat. What lasts thousands of years is
dust with radioactive isotopes. When those lodge in a body, they
tickle nearby tissue with alpha particles until they become
cancer. Years later.
Sssshhh. The elimination of web know-it-alls could be the end result.
There is an old man living at one of the lesser toxic zones of
Chernobyl. His wife and daughter both died of effects of radiation. The
Government has allowed him to live there as a study and he has no
family. There was a full program on American TV a few years ago that
actually filmed the children's toys and household furnishings to
indicate how rapidly and fully the surviving residents fled. The old man >>> also trapped animals for the scientists to study. Also the plant life.
The Russian Scientists are way ahead of us on those studies. I have
searched the Web for that Documentary, but no luck. I believe it was on
PBS a number of years ago.
<https://www.pbs.org/newshour/show/the-impact-of-chernobyls-nuclear-disaster-33-years-later>
https://tinyurl.com/yyxr8f4q
The impact of Chernobyl’s nuclear disaster 33 years later
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-03-04/can-the-dogs-of-chernobyl-teach-us-new-tricks-on-survival-/102054608
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 546 |
| Nodes: | 16 (0 / 16) |
| Uptime: | 170:19:19 |
| Calls: | 10,385 |
| Calls today: | 2 |
| Files: | 14,057 |
| Messages: | 6,416,557 |