• ? = China could take control of Taiwan without firing a shot

    From a425couple@21:1/5 to All on Sat May 18 10:27:53 2024
    XPost: soc.history.war.misc, alt.economics

    Here is an alternative opinion.

    from
    https://www.yahoo.com/news/us-worried-invasion-china-could-214601138.html

    Business Insider
    The US is worried about an invasion, but China could take control of
    Taiwan without firing a shot, war experts warn
    Chris Panella
    Thu, May 16, 2024 at 2:46 PM PDT·6 min read
    482

    The US is worried about an invasion, but China could take control of
    Taiwan without firing a shot, war experts warn
    The US and its allies are focused on preventing a Chinese invasion of
    Taiwan.

    A new report argues there's a lack of readiness for other ways China
    could take control of Taiwan.

    An aggressive Chinese coercion campaign is far more likely than an
    invasion and already happening, experts warn.

    With the US and its allies focused on what a Chinese invasion of Taiwan
    could look like, and how American forces could defend Taiwan if
    necessary, they're missing a glaring alternative strategy China could
    employ to capture Taiwan, a new report argues.

    Defense experts say that an aggressive Chinese coercion campaign, short
    of war but still threatening, is more likely than a full-scale invasion
    and the US needs to prepare for such an event.

    A new report co-authored by war experts from the American Enterprise
    Institute and the Institute for the Study of War explores a scenario
    where China undergoes a "coercion campaign that remains far short of
    invasion but nevertheless brings Taiwan under Beijing's control,"
    identifying such an event as a "significant gap in US strategic thought."

    Elements of such a campaign are already underway and include China's
    military exercises both in the Taiwan Strait and around the island,
    which are growing in scale and raising worries about escalation.
    Economic and diplomatic pressure is notable, and Chinese misinformation operations and the potential to slowly set up a blockade of Taiwan are
    also concerns.

    The increasing Chinese military presence around Taiwan, the report says,
    could exhaust and overwhelm Taiwan's military and fuel a narrative that
    it is unable to defend the island, decreasing "trust in the military and feelings of security among the Taiwanese populace."

    Taiwan's AAV7 amphibious assault vehicle maneuvers across the sea during
    the Han Kuang military exercise, which simulates China's People's
    Liberation Army (PLA) invading the island, on July 28, 2022 in Pingtung, Taiwan.
    Taiwan's AAV7 amphibious assault vehicle maneuvers across the sea during
    the Han Kuang military exercise, which simulates China's People's
    Liberation Army (PLA) invading the island, on July 28, 2022 in Pingtung, Taiwan.Annabelle Chih/Getty Images
    The report identifies four things key to resisting Chinese coercion. The
    first is a US-Taiwanese strategic relationship that foregoes concerns
    that "cooperation directly precipitates further escalation, whereas
    peace and prosperity are just around the corner if this partnership is
    halted."

    Second, Taiwan's government must function despite Chinese efforts to
    undermine it in the eyes of the Taiwanese people through things like
    "economic warfare, cyber warfare, sabotage, rigorous (and pseudo-legal) inspections of ships carrying goods to Taiwan, air and sea closures,
    electronic warfare, and propaganda critical of government mismanagement."

    These efforts include significantly degrading Taiwan's essential
    services, like clean water and electricity.

    The third point is that Taiwanese people must resist Chinese "cognitive
    and psychological campaigns" aimed at breaking their rejection of the
    Chinese government, including "intimidating supporters of resistance,
    sowing doubt and fear among the population, and generating demands to
    trade political concessions for peace."

    And lastly, there has to be resistance against "widespread information campaigns" that "aim to decrease the US public's and political
    leadership's willingness to support Taiwan." Such campaigns are already occurring, prompting anxiety that the US public and government may see
    getting involved in defending Taiwan as heightening risks of war at a significant cost with little to gain. The AEI and ISW experts argue that
    is not the case.

    Notably, the report says that "Taiwan is strategically vital to the
    larger US-led coalition to contain" China, arguing that a US-friendly
    Taiwan links America's allies in the northwestern Pacific with US
    partners and allies to the south."

    A China-controlled Taiwan, however, "would become a springboard for
    further PRC aggression and would seriously compromise the US-led
    coalition's ability to operate cohesively."

    A US-made AH-1W Super Cobra helicopter launches flares during an annual
    drill at the a military base in the eastern city of Hualien on January
    30, 2018.
    A US-made AH-1W Super Cobra helicopter launches flares during an annual
    drill at the a military base in the eastern city of Hualien on January
    30, 2018.MANDY CHENG/AFP via Getty Images
    The authors of the new report present coordinated actions China could
    pursue to prompt Taiwan and its partners to accept reunification,
    referring to it as a "short-of-war coercion course of action."

    Some of Beijing's biggest problems are Taiwanese resistance to China,
    which continues to grow, especially after the historic election of
    Democratic Progressive Party candidate Lai Ching-te, who is currently
    the vice president, in January, and continued support from the US and
    its regional allies.

    The new report looks at a hypothetical timeline that begins with the inauguration of Lai this month and leads into 2028, imaging how China
    and Taiwan could, by that point, come to a "peace" agreement. China
    could ultimately be successful in such a campaign, the authors say, if
    the US and its allies fail to recognize Beijing's coercive tactics or strategically plan to deter them.

    The US must clearly "recognize the possibility and danger of a coercion campaign that is far more intense than the one currently ongoing against
    Taiwan and develop ways to prevent Taiwan's isolation through means
    short of war," they write.

    The report's authors argue that "increased efforts in the information
    domain will be key to ensuring that the US government and friendly international audiences do not fall prey to [Chinese] information
    operations intended to reshape the way Americans and key international
    actors think."

    CM-11 tanks fire artillery during the 2-day live-fire drill, amid
    intensifying threats military from China, in Pingtung county, Taiwan, 7 September 2022.
    CM-11 tanks fire artillery during the 2-day live-fire drill, amid
    intensifying threats military from China, in Pingtung county, Taiwan, 7 September 2022.Ceng Shou Yi/NurPhoto via Getty Images
    US-Taiwanese relations and concerns about an aggressive China in the
    Pacific region are often at the forefront of the minds of US officials
    and experts, but the focus is frequently on hard power elements, even if
    there is recognition of some of the coercive aspects of Chinese behavior.

    In March, US Navy Adm. John Aquilano, then the commander of US
    Indo-Pacific Command, stressed that China was pursuing a massive
    military build-up not seen since World War II and "all indications"
    pointed to it "meeting President Xi Jinping's directive to be ready to
    invade Taiwan by 2027." He also told the US Armed Services House
    Committee China's actions indicated it would ready to unify Taiwan by
    force, if necessary.

    Aquilano urged lawmakers to intensify the US' military development and posturing in the Pacific in order to deter such a fight.

    And, earlier this month, over a dozen US lawmakers wrote to US Navy
    Secretary Carlos Del Toro and Air Force Secretary Frank Kendall, raising concerns about what preparations were being made to harden the US
    presence in the Pacific and deter military action from China.

    Of the lawmakers' concerns, the most prominent appeared to be the lack
    of active and passive defenses protecting US bases in the area,
    specifically on Guam and in Japan. "We are concerned about the alarming
    lack of urgency by the Department of Defense in adopting such defensive measures," they wrote, adding that "it is apparent that the Pentagon is
    not urgently pursuing needed passive defenses" to harden US bases and
    airfields from a vicious, preemptive strike by China's threatening
    missile force.

    Read the original article on Business Insider

    View comments (481)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)