XPost: or.politics, ca.politics, seattle.politics
XPost: alt.law-enforcement

from https://www.cnn.com/2024/08/16/business/harris-price-gouging-ban-inflation/index.html

Harris’ plan to stop price gouging could create more problems than it solves By Elisabeth Buchwald, CNN
3 minute read
Updated 7:27 PM EDT, Fri August 16, 2024

Food prices have surged by more than 20% under the Biden-Harris
administration, leaving many voters eager to stretch their dollars
further at the grocery store.

On Friday, Vice President Kamala Harris said she has a solution: a
federal ban on price gouging across the food industry.

“My plan will include new penalties for opportunistic companies that
exploit crises and break the rules,” Harris said at a campaign event.

There’s just one issue: Harris’ proposal could create more problems than the one it’s trying to solve, some economists say.

Gavin Roberts studied anti-price gouging laws some states passed during
the pandemic. One of the biggest effects he observed, especially at
grocery stores, was that these laws motivated people “to go buy goods
more than they would if prices had risen.”

A customer refuels a vehicle at a Mobil gas station in Los Angeles,
California, US, on Tuesday, April 2, 2024.
RELATED ARTICLE
From Taylor Swift tickets to gasoline — these days everyone feels like they’re being price-gouged. Are they?

When prices are high, in most cases, the best policy action in response
is actually taking no action, Roberts, the chair of Weber State
University’s economics department, told CNN.

That would cause consumers who are deterred by, say, high prices of
beef, to instead purchase another type of meat or protein. That helps
keep beef on the grocery store shelves for people who want it enough to
pay the higher prices.

And while Harris claims her proposal “will help the food industry become
more competitive,” Roberts said it would do just the opposite. “It’s
more likely to maintain that status quo,” he said because it would keep
new competition from moving in to take advantage of the bigger profit
margins — competition that could have helped lower prices in the long run.

Jason Furman, a top economist in the Obama administration, shared
Roberts’ view that anti-price gouging laws could inadvertently harm consumers. “This is not sensible policy, and I think the biggest hope is
that it ends up being a lot of rhetoric and no reality,” he told the New
York Times. “There’s no upside here, and there is some downside.”

Instead of pursuing anti-price gouging policies, Roberts recommended
that Harris investigate what, if anything, is stopping new parties from entering concentrated industries.

To his point, a campaign fact sheet said that Harris also plans to make
more resources available for “the federal government to identify and
take on price-fixing and other anti-competitive practices in the food
and grocery industries.”

Campaign staff declined to comment on critiques of Harris’ proposed price-gouging ban, pointing CNN to Harris’ speech and the fact sheet
shared ahead of it.

to Harris’ speech and the fact sheet shared ahead of it.

What’s behind price increases the past few years
The jury is still out on the extent to which price gouging has
contributed to inflation over the last few years.

Research from the San Francisco Federal Reserve suggests alleged
corporate price gouging was not a primary catalyst for the inflation
surge that began in 2021, while progressive-leaning think tanks have
published research that suggests there’s a more direct link.

Until late last year, companies routinely said on their quarterly
earnings calls with investors that customers continued to pay for goods
even as businesses hiked prices. That’s because demand stayed high,
fueled by bigger paychecks and pandemic stimulus that padded savings
accounts. So many economists contend corporate profits were juiced by
that thing you learned in Econ 101: supply and demand – not corporate
greed (alone, anyway).

In any event, the inflation Americans have had to contend with over the
past few years is the product of a confluence of events that include the
war in Ukraine, government spending and pandemic-related disruptions
across the economy. The unprecedented stress on supply chains in the
thick of the pandemic, for example, contributed significantly to
inflation’s rise in early 2021.

And the Harris proposal had its supporters, as well.

Lindsay Owens, executive director of Groundwork Collaborative, a
progressive think tank, applauded the plan. “I definitely don’t think
that the price gouging statute will result in shortages,” she told CNN, adding that it would give government agencies like the Federal Trade
Commission more authority to “crack down on bad actors” charging
consumers higher prices.

“It’s good to see this aggressive approach,” she said.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)