NASA Battery Tech to Deliver for the Grid
A battery built for satellites brings grid-scale storage down to Earth
Technologies for space are designed to be tough, safe, and
long-lasting. So what happens when you bring the battery chemistry
deployed on the International Space Station, nickel-hydrogen, down to
Earth?
"[It's] the most durable battery ever invented," says Jorg Heinemann. Nickel-hydrogen batteries, he says, can last for 30,000 charge cycles,
are fireproof, and outperform lithium-ion batteries on a number of key metrics for energy storage at the large scale.
Heinemann is CEO of EnerVenue, a nickel-hydrogen battery manufacturer
based in Fremont, Calif. "Our cost is comparable to where lithium-ion
is going, and we use earth-abundant materials," he says. "Nickel is
the most expensive thing we use. We operate at a 90 percent round-trip efficiency, more efficient than lithium-ion. And there's basically no maintenance on this battery, it was designed for sending up on a
rocket ship into outer space."
Nickel-hydrogen batteries can run for tens of thousands of cycles,
giving them a life of over 30 years.
https://spectrum.ieee.org/grid-scale-battery-storage-nickel-hydrogen#toggle-gdpr
Wasn't it this NG that gave me a link to glass battery technology?
Nickel-hydrogen batteries can run for tens of thousands of cycles,
giving them a life of over 30 years.
Trade offs must be considered....charge cycles....safety...raw
material available...battery dimensions, weight, etc
Wasn't it this NG that gave me a link to glass battery technology?
On Sun, 01 Oct 2023 07:39:00 -0500
JAB <here@is.invalid> wrote:
Trade offs must be considered....charge cycles....safety...raw
material available...battery dimensions, weight, etc
The big one is, unfortunately, cost. Li-Ion works "pretty well" at far
lower cost. Some of that is economies of scale. And not just purchase
cost - cost of operation, maintenance, replacement, decommissioning,
safety features etc.
Li-Ion is currently 90% of the grid-scale battery market. Their combustibility is being handled by new systems that automatically
monitor and control heat build up and deploy fire protection systems if necessary. That's not ideal, but it seems to still be more cost
effective than alternatives.
I'm watching flow batteries carefully, but they're finicky and
expensive. Check out vanadium redox for example.
There's the scaling up problem - is there enough Lithium out there? (I
don't know it's a geniune question)
https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20201124-how-geothermal-lithium-could-revolutionise-green-energy
(I just get "Loading", maybe it works for othyer browsers)
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 488 |
Nodes: | 16 (3 / 13) |
Uptime: | 08:42:02 |
Calls: | 9,664 |
Calls today: | 6 |
Files: | 13,711 |
Messages: | 6,167,107 |
Posted today: | 2 |