News • University
Stanford president resigns over manipulated research, will retract at least three papers
Marc Tessier-Lavigne failed to address manipulated papers, fostered unhealthy lab dynamic, Stanford report says
https://stanforddaily.com/2023/07/19/stanford-president-resigns-over-manipulated-research-will-retract-at-least-3-papers/
investigation found “manipulation of research data.”
"The report concluded that the fudging of results under Tessier-Lavigne’s purview “spanned labs at three separate institutions.”
It identified a culture where Tessier-Lavigne “tended to reward the ‘winners’ (that is, postdocs who could generate favorable results) and
marginalize or diminish the ‘losers’ (that is, postdocs who were unable or struggled to generate such data).”
"For several papers worthy of retraction to have been principally authored by the same scientist represents “unusual frequency of
manipulation of research data and/or substandard scientific practices,” " (pattern of racketteering)
""In the report, the scientific panel raised questions about allegations of fraud in a major 2009 Alzheimer’s study that claimed to
have found the cause of neurodegeneration in Alzheimer’s patients and was publicly called “the most important discovery in Alzheimer’s in
the last 20 years, maybe ever” by former Genentech executive Richard Scheller."" (follow the money)
"...contain doctored imagery..."
https://stanforddaily.com/2023/07/19/stanford-president-resigns-over-manipulated-research-will-retract-at-least-3-papers/
https://boardoftrustees.stanford.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/5/2023/07/Scientific-Panel-Final-Report.pdf
'If the facts don't fit the theory, change the facts.' -Albert Einstein
On 21-July-23 3:15 am, The Starmaker wrote:
News • University
Stanford president resigns over manipulated research, will retract at
least three papers
Marc Tessier-Lavigne failed to address manipulated papers, fostered
unhealthy lab dynamic, Stanford report says
https://stanforddaily.com/2023/07/19/stanford-president-resigns-over-manipulated-research-will-retract-at-least-3-papers/
investigation found “manipulation of research data.”
"The report concluded that the fudging of results under
Tessier-Lavigne’s purview “spanned labs at three separate institutions.”
It identified a culture where Tessier-Lavigne “tended to reward the
‘winners’ (that is, postdocs who could generate favorable results) and >> marginalize or diminish the ‘losers’ (that is, postdocs who were
unable or struggled to generate such data).”
"For several papers worthy of retraction to have been principally
authored by the same scientist represents “unusual frequency of
manipulation of research data and/or substandard scientific
practices,” " (pattern of racketteering)
""In the report, the scientific panel raised questions about
allegations of fraud in a major 2009 Alzheimer’s study that claimed to
have found the cause of neurodegeneration in Alzheimer’s patients and
was publicly called “the most important discovery in Alzheimer’s in
the last 20 years, maybe ever” by former Genentech executive Richard
Scheller."" (follow the money)
"...contain doctored imagery..."
https://stanforddaily.com/2023/07/19/stanford-president-resigns-over-manipulated-research-will-retract-at-least-3-papers/
https://boardoftrustees.stanford.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/5/2023/07/Scientific-Panel-Final-Report.pdf
'If the facts don't fit the theory, change the facts.' -Albert Einstein
He never said that.
On 7/21/2023 6:44 PM, Sylvia Else wrote:
On 21-July-23 3:15 am, The Starmaker wrote:
News • University
Stanford president resigns over manipulated research, will retract at
least three papers
Marc Tessier-Lavigne failed to address manipulated papers, fostered
unhealthy lab dynamic, Stanford report says
https://stanforddaily.com/2023/07/19/stanford-president-resigns-over-manipulated-research-will-retract-at-least-3-papers/
investigation found “manipulation of research data.”
"The report concluded that the fudging of results under
Tessier-Lavigne’s purview “spanned labs at three separate institutions.”
It identified a culture where Tessier-Lavigne “tended to reward the
‘winners’ (that is, postdocs who could generate favorable results) and >>> marginalize or diminish the ‘losers’ (that is, postdocs who were
unable or struggled to generate such data).”
"For several papers worthy of retraction to have been principally
authored by the same scientist represents “unusual frequency of
manipulation of research data and/or substandard scientific
practices,” " (pattern of racketteering)
""In the report, the scientific panel raised questions about
allegations of fraud in a major 2009 Alzheimer’s study that claimed to >>> have found the cause of neurodegeneration in Alzheimer’s patients and
was publicly called “the most important discovery in Alzheimer’s in
the last 20 years, maybe ever” by former Genentech executive
Richard Scheller."" (follow the money)
"...contain doctored imagery..."
https://stanforddaily.com/2023/07/19/stanford-president-resigns-over-manipulated-research-will-retract-at-least-3-papers/
https://boardoftrustees.stanford.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/5/2023/07/Scientific-Panel-Final-Report.pdf
'If the facts don't fit the theory, change the facts.' -Albert Einstein
He never said that.
The facts didn't fit Starfarter's theory so he changed the facts.
On 21-July-23 3:15 am, The Starmaker wrote:
News • University
Stanford president resigns over manipulated research, will retract at least three papers
Marc Tessier-Lavigne failed to address manipulated papers, fostered unhealthy lab dynamic, Stanford report says
https://stanforddaily.com/2023/07/19/stanford-president-resigns-over-manipulated-research-will-retract-at-least-3-papers/
investigation found “manipulation of research data.”
"The report concluded that the fudging of results under Tessier-Lavigne’s purview “spanned labs at three separate institutions.”
It identified a culture where Tessier-Lavigne “tended to reward the ‘winners’ (that is, postdocs who could generate favorable results) and
marginalize or diminish the ‘losers’ (that is, postdocs who were unable or struggled to generate such data).”
"For several papers worthy of retraction to have been principally authored by the same scientist represents “unusual frequency of
manipulation of research data and/or substandard scientific practices,” " (pattern of racketteering)
""In the report, the scientific panel raised questions about allegations of fraud in a major 2009 Alzheimer’s study that claimed to
have found the cause of neurodegeneration in Alzheimer’s patients and was publicly called “the most important discovery in Alzheimer’s in
the last 20 years, maybe ever” by former Genentech executive Richard Scheller."" (follow the money)
"...contain doctored imagery..."
https://stanforddaily.com/2023/07/19/stanford-president-resigns-over-manipulated-research-will-retract-at-least-3-papers/
https://boardoftrustees.stanford.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/5/2023/07/Scientific-Panel-Final-Report.pdf
'If the facts don't fit the theory, change the facts.' -Albert Einstein
He never said that.
Sylvia.
Sylvia Else wrote:
On 21-July-23 3:15 am, The Starmaker wrote:
News • University
Stanford president resigns over manipulated research, will retract at least three papers
Marc Tessier-Lavigne failed to address manipulated papers, fostered unhealthy lab dynamic, Stanford report says
https://stanforddaily.com/2023/07/19/stanford-president-resigns-over-manipulated-research-will-retract-at-least-3-papers/
investigation found “manipulation of research data.”
"The report concluded that the fudging of results under Tessier-Lavigne’s purview “spanned labs at three separate institutions.”
It identified a culture where Tessier-Lavigne “tended to reward the ‘winners’ (that is, postdocs who could generate favorable results) and
marginalize or diminish the ‘losers’ (that is, postdocs who were unable or struggled to generate such data).”
"For several papers worthy of retraction to have been principally authored by the same scientist represents “unusual frequency of
manipulation of research data and/or substandard scientific practices,” " (pattern of racketteering)
""In the report, the scientific panel raised questions about allegations of fraud in a major 2009 Alzheimer’s study that claimed to
have found the cause of neurodegeneration in Alzheimer’s patients and was publicly called “the most important discovery in Alzheimer’s in
the last 20 years, maybe ever” by former Genentech executive Richard Scheller."" (follow the money)
"...contain doctored imagery..."
https://stanforddaily.com/2023/07/19/stanford-president-resigns-over-manipulated-research-will-retract-at-least-3-papers/
https://boardoftrustees.stanford.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/5/2023/07/Scientific-Panel-Final-Report.pdf
'If the facts don't fit the theory, change the facts.' -Albert Einstein
He never said that.
Sylvia.
Are you saying it is not characteristic of Albert Einstein to say: 'If the facts don't fit the theory, change the facts.'
or do you attributed it to someone else? Who then if not Albert Einsten????
The name "Sylvia Else" sounds like it contain a doctored imagery...Does "Else' mean someone Else? Or are you a Usenet Trans...from guy to girl?? or something else...
Stanford's president Marc Tessier-Lavigne is still a FRAUD. A crook.
The fact is...The Hebrew University of Jerusalem associated that quote to Albert Einstein. Are they wrong? (and they published it in a book associating that exact quote to Albert Einstein:
'If the facts don't fit the theory, change the facts.'
Sylvia Else wrote:
On 21-July-23 3:15 am, The Starmaker wrote:
News • University
Stanford president resigns over manipulated research, will retract at least three papers
Marc Tessier-Lavigne failed to address manipulated papers, fostered unhealthy lab dynamic, Stanford report says
https://stanforddaily.com/2023/07/19/stanford-president-resigns-over-manipulated-research-will-retract-at-least-3-papers/
investigation found “manipulation of research data.”
"The report concluded that the fudging of results under Tessier-Lavigne’s purview “spanned labs at three separate institutions.”
It identified a culture where Tessier-Lavigne “tended to reward the ‘winners’ (that is, postdocs who could generate favorable results) and
marginalize or diminish the ‘losers’ (that is, postdocs who were unable or struggled to generate such data).”
"For several papers worthy of retraction to have been principally authored by the same scientist represents “unusual frequency of
manipulation of research data and/or substandard scientific practices,” " (pattern of racketteering)
""In the report, the scientific panel raised questions about allegations of fraud in a major 2009 Alzheimer’s study that claimed to
have found the cause of neurodegeneration in Alzheimer’s patients and was publicly called “the most important discovery in Alzheimer’s in
the last 20 years, maybe ever” by former Genentech executive Richard Scheller."" (follow the money)
"...contain doctored imagery..."
https://stanforddaily.com/2023/07/19/stanford-president-resigns-over-manipulated-research-will-retract-at-least-3-papers/
https://boardoftrustees.stanford.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/5/2023/07/Scientific-Panel-Final-Report.pdf
'If the facts don't fit the theory, change the facts.' -Albert Einstein
He never said that.
Sylvia.Are you saying it is not characteristic of Albert Einstein to say: 'If the facts don't fit the theory, change the facts.'
or do you attributed it to someone else? Who then if not Albert Einsten????
The name "Sylvia Else" sounds like it contain a doctored imagery...Does "Else' mean someone Else? Or are you a Usenet Trans...from guy to girl?? or something else...
Stanford's president Marc Tessier-Lavigne is still a FRAUD. A crook.
The fact is...The Hebrew University of Jerusalem associated that quote to Albert Einstein. Are they wrong? (and they published it in a book associating that exact quote to Albert Einstein:
'If the facts don't fit the theory, change the facts.'
--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
the unchallengeable.
On 7/21/2023 6:44 PM, Sylvia Else wrote:
On 21-July-23 3:15 am, The Starmaker wrote:
News • University
Stanford president resigns over manipulated research, will retract at
least three papers
Marc Tessier-Lavigne failed to address manipulated papers, fostered
unhealthy lab dynamic, Stanford report says
https://stanforddaily.com/2023/07/19/stanford-president-resigns-over-manipulated-research-will-retract-at-least-3-papers/
investigation found “manipulation of research data.”
"The report concluded that the fudging of results under
Tessier-Lavigne’s purview “spanned labs at three separate institutions.”
It identified a culture where Tessier-Lavigne “tended to reward the
‘winners’ (that is, postdocs who could generate favorable results) and >> marginalize or diminish the ‘losers’ (that is, postdocs who were
unable or struggled to generate such data).”
"For several papers worthy of retraction to have been principally
authored by the same scientist represents “unusual frequency of
manipulation of research data and/or substandard scientific
practices,” " (pattern of racketteering)
""In the report, the scientific panel raised questions about
allegations of fraud in a major 2009 Alzheimer’s study that claimed to >> have found the cause of neurodegeneration in Alzheimer’s patients and
was publicly called “the most important discovery in Alzheimer’s in
the last 20 years, maybe ever” by former Genentech executive Richard >> Scheller."" (follow the money)
"...contain doctored imagery..."
https://stanforddaily.com/2023/07/19/stanford-president-resigns-over-manipulated-research-will-retract-at-least-3-papers/
https://boardoftrustees.stanford.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/5/2023/07/Scientific-Panel-Final-Report.pdf
'If the facts don't fit the theory, change the facts.' -Albert Einstein
He never said that.
The facts didn't fit Starfarter's theory so he changed the facts.
On Saturday, 22 July 2023 at 11:38:57 UTC+8, The Starmaker wrote:
Sylvia Else wrote:
On 21-July-23 3:15 am, The Starmaker wrote:
News • University
Stanford president resigns over manipulated research, will retract at least three papers
Marc Tessier-Lavigne failed to address manipulated papers, fostered unhealthy lab dynamic, Stanford report says
https://stanforddaily.com/2023/07/19/stanford-president-resigns-over-manipulated-research-will-retract-at-least-3-papers/
investigation found “manipulation of research data.”
"The report concluded that the fudging of results under Tessier-Lavigne’s purview “spanned labs at three separate institutions.”
It identified a culture where Tessier-Lavigne “tended to reward the ‘winners’ (that is, postdocs who could generate favorable results) and
marginalize or diminish the ‘losers’ (that is, postdocs who were unable or struggled to generate such data).”
"For several papers worthy of retraction to have been principally authored by the same scientist represents “unusual frequency of
manipulation of research data and/or substandard scientific practices,” " (pattern of racketteering)
""In the report, the scientific panel raised questions about allegations of fraud in a major 2009 Alzheimer’s study that claimed to
have found the cause of neurodegeneration in Alzheimer’s patients and was publicly called “the most important discovery in Alzheimer’s in
the last 20 years, maybe ever” by former Genentech executive Richard Scheller."" (follow the money)
"...contain doctored imagery..."
https://stanforddaily.com/2023/07/19/stanford-president-resigns-over-manipulated-research-will-retract-at-least-3-papers/
https://boardoftrustees.stanford.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/5/2023/07/Scientific-Panel-Final-Report.pdf
'If the facts don't fit the theory, change the facts.' -Albert Einstein
He never said that.
Sylvia.Are you saying it is not characteristic of Albert Einstein to say: 'If the facts don't fit the theory, change the facts.'
or do you attributed it to someone else? Who then if not Albert Einsten????The actions of the chelas (disciples) show the nature of their guru.
The name "Sylvia Else" sounds like it contain a doctored imagery...Does "Else' mean someone Else? Or are you a Usenet Trans...from guy to girl?? or something else...
Stanford's president Marc Tessier-Lavigne is still a FRAUD. A crook.
The fact is...The Hebrew University of Jerusalem associated that quote to Albert Einstein. Are they wrong? (and they published it in a book associating that exact quote to Albert Einstein:
'If the facts don't fit the theory, change the facts.'
--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
the unchallengeable.
Volney wrote:
On 7/21/2023 6:44 PM, Sylvia Else wrote:
On 21-July-23 3:15 am, The Starmaker wrote:
News • University
Stanford president resigns over manipulated research, will retract at >> least three papers
Marc Tessier-Lavigne failed to address manipulated papers, fostered
unhealthy lab dynamic, Stanford report says
https://stanforddaily.com/2023/07/19/stanford-president-resigns-over-manipulated-research-will-retract-at-least-3-papers/
investigation found “manipulation of research data.”
"The report concluded that the fudging of results under
Tessier-Lavigne’s purview “spanned labs at three separate institutions.”
It identified a culture where Tessier-Lavigne “tended to reward the >> ‘winners’ (that is, postdocs who could generate favorable results) and
marginalize or diminish the ‘losers’ (that is, postdocs who were
unable or struggled to generate such data).”
"For several papers worthy of retraction to have been principally
authored by the same scientist represents “unusual frequency of
manipulation of research data and/or substandard scientific
practices,” "Â Â Â (pattern of racketteering)
""In the report, the scientific panel raised questions about
allegations of fraud in a major 2009 Alzheimer’s study that claimed to
have found the cause of neurodegeneration in Alzheimer’s patients and >> was publicly called “the most important discovery in Alzheimer’s in >> Â the last 20 years, maybe ever” by former Genentech executive Richard
Scheller.""Â Â (follow the money)
"...contain doctored imagery..."
https://stanforddaily.com/2023/07/19/stanford-president-resigns-over-manipulated-research-will-retract-at-least-3-papers/
https://boardoftrustees.stanford.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/5/2023/07/Scientific-Panel-Final-Report.pdf
'If the facts don't fit the theory, change the facts.' -Albert Einstein >>
He never said that.
The facts didn't fit Starfarter's theory so he changed the facts.I didn't change the facts.
Fact number one: This link points to a book that reads:
The Ultimate Quotable Einstein
By Albert Einstein
https://books.google.com/books?id=A32-DwAAQBAJ&printsec=frontcover&dq=editions:tNFoVCjXVqkC&hl
Fact number two: copyright by The Hebrew University of Jerusalem and Princeton University.
Fact number three: The quote is in the book! see page 483
https://books.google.com/books?id=A32-DwAAQBAJ&pg=PA483&dq=%27#v=onepage&q&f=false
Now, let's go back to
Fact #1: The Ultimate Quotable Einstein By Albert Einstein
Doesn't the words ( By Albert Einstein) mean Albert Einstein is the author of the book entittled:
The Ultimate Quotable Einstein By Albert Einstein?
Fact #2 The Hebrew University of Jerusalem and Princeton University certaintly should know better than anyone else.
Fact #3 IT'S IN THE FUCKING BOOK!!!!
https://books.google.com/books?id=A32-DwAAQBAJ&pg=PA483&dq=%27#v=onepage&q&f=false
ALBERT EINSTEIN IS THE FUCKING AUTHOR!!!
https://books.google.com/books?id=A32-DwAAQBAJ&pg=PA483&dq=%27#v=onepage&q&f=false
Where did you people go to skool, Stanford University????
Fudging University!
'If the fudging don't fit the fudge, fudge the fudging.'
--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
the unchallengeable.
On Saturday, July 22, 2023 at 2:32:40 PM UTC-7, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Saturday, July 22, 2023 at 1:37:19 AM UTC-7, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
On Saturday, 22 July 2023 at 11:38:57 UTC+8, The Starmaker wrote:
'If the facts don't fit the theory, change the facts.' -Albert Einstein
He never said that.
He did on last day.Evidence for this claim, Mitch? Got any?
On Saturday, July 22, 2023 at 1:37:19 AM UTC-7, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
On Saturday, 22 July 2023 at 11:38:57 UTC+8, The Starmaker wrote:
'If the facts don't fit the theory, change the facts.' -Albert Einstein
He never said that.
He did on last day.
On Saturday, July 22, 2023 at 5:46:24 PM UTC-7, Paul Alsing wrote:
On Saturday, July 22, 2023 at 2:32:40 PM UTC-7, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Saturday, July 22, 2023 at 1:37:19 AM UTC-7, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
On Saturday, 22 July 2023 at 11:38:57 UTC+8, The Starmaker wrote:
'If the facts don't fit the theory, change the facts.' -Albert Einstein
He never said that.
He did on last day.
Evidence for this claim, Mitch? Got any?
Einstein had a God. He said the atheists were his problem.
On his last day he wrote it. But science doesn't want it.
On Saturday, July 22, 2023 at 6:05:39 PM UTC-7, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Saturday, July 22, 2023 at 5:46:24 PM UTC-7, Paul Alsing wrote:
On Saturday, July 22, 2023 at 2:32:40 PM UTC-7, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Saturday, July 22, 2023 at 1:37:19 AM UTC-7, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
On Saturday, 22 July 2023 at 11:38:57 UTC+8, The Starmaker wrote:
'If the facts don't fit the theory, change the facts.' -Albert Einstein
He never said that.
He did on last day.
Evidence for this claim, Mitch? Got any?
Einstein had a God. He said the atheists were his problem.I still don't see any evidence, Mitch. I think you are just making this up.
On his last day he wrote it. But science doesn't want it.
On Saturday, July 22, 2023 at 6:48:28 PM UTC-7, Paul Alsing wrote:
On Saturday, July 22, 2023 at 6:05:39 PM UTC-7, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Saturday, July 22, 2023 at 5:46:24 PM UTC-7, Paul Alsing wrote:
On Saturday, July 22, 2023 at 2:32:40 PM UTC-7, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Saturday, July 22, 2023 at 1:37:19 AM UTC-7, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
On Saturday, 22 July 2023 at 11:38:57 UTC+8, The Starmaker wrote:
'If the facts don't fit the theory, change the facts.' -Albert Einstein
He never said that.
He did on last day.
Evidence for this claim, Mitch? Got any?
Einstein had a God. He said the atheists were his problem.
On his last day he wrote it. But science doesn't want it.
I still don't see any evidence, Mitch. I think you are just making this up.
He was not an atheist. Science didn't want that...
On Saturday, July 22, 2023 at 5:46:24 PM UTC-7, Paul Alsing wrote:
On Saturday, July 22, 2023 at 2:32:40 PM UTC-7, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote: >> > On Saturday, July 22, 2023 at 1:37:19 AM UTC-7, Arindam Banerjee wrote: >> > > On Saturday, 22 July 2023 at 11:38:57 UTC+8, The Starmaker wrote:
Evidence for this claim, Mitch? Got any?'If the facts don't fit the theory, change the facts.' -Albert Einstein
He never said that.
He did on last day.
Einstein had a God. He said the atheists were his problem.
On his last day he wrote it. But science doesn't want it.
He did on last day. He said science was lying.
The liar lies and it was not Einstein.
It is science as authority that lies.
Volney wrote:
On 7/21/2023 6:44 PM, Sylvia Else wrote:
On 21-July-23 3:15 am, The Starmaker wrote:
News • University
Stanford president resigns over manipulated research, will retract at
least three papers
Marc Tessier-Lavigne failed to address manipulated papers, fostered
unhealthy lab dynamic, Stanford report says
https://stanforddaily.com/2023/07/19/stanford-president-resigns-over-manipulated-research-will-retract-at-least-3-papers/
investigation found “manipulation of research data.”
"The report concluded that the fudging of results under
Tessier-Lavigne’s purview “spanned labs at three separate institutions.”
It identified a culture where Tessier-Lavigne “tended to reward the
‘winners’ (that is, postdocs who could generate favorable results) and
marginalize or diminish the ‘losers’ (that is, postdocs who were
unable or struggled to generate such data).”
"For several papers worthy of retraction to have been principally
authored by the same scientist represents “unusual frequency of
manipulation of research data and/or substandard scientific
practices,” " (pattern of racketteering)
""In the report, the scientific panel raised questions about
allegations of fraud in a major 2009 Alzheimer’s study that claimed to >> have found the cause of neurodegeneration in Alzheimer’s patients and >> was publicly called “the most important discovery in Alzheimer’s in >> the last 20 years, maybe ever” by former Genentech executive Richard
Scheller."" (follow the money)
"...contain doctored imagery..."
https://stanforddaily.com/2023/07/19/stanford-president-resigns-over-manipulated-research-will-retract-at-least-3-papers/
https://boardoftrustees.stanford.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/5/2023/07/Scientific-Panel-Final-Report.pdf
'If the facts don't fit the theory, change the facts.' -Albert Einstein >>
He never said that.
The facts didn't fit Starfarter's theory so he changed the facts.
I didn't change the facts.
Fact number one: This link points to a book that reads:
The Ultimate Quotable Einstein
By Albert Einstein
https://books.google.com/books?id=A32-DwAAQBAJ&printsec=frontcover&dq=editions:tNFoVCjXVqkC&hl
Fact number two: copyright by The Hebrew University of Jerusalem and Princeton University.
Fact number three: The quote is in the book! see page 483
https://books.google.com/books?id=A32-DwAAQBAJ&pg=PA483&dq=%27#v=onepage&q&f=false
Now, let's go back to
Fact #1: The Ultimate Quotable Einstein By Albert Einstein
Doesn't the words ( By Albert Einstein) mean Albert Einstein is the author of the book entittled:
The Ultimate Quotable Einstein By Albert Einstein?
Fact #2 The Hebrew University of Jerusalem and Princeton University certaintly should know better than anyone else.
Fact #3 IT'S IN THE FUCKING BOOK!!!!
https://books.google.com/books?id=A32-DwAAQBAJ&pg=PA483&dq=%27#v=onepage&q&f=false
ALBERT EINSTEIN IS THE FUCKING AUTHOR!!!
https://books.google.com/books?id=A32-DwAAQBAJ&pg=PA483&dq=%27#v=onepage&q&f=false
Where did you people go to skool, Stanford University????
Fudging University!
'If the fudging don't fit the fudge, fudge the fudging.'
The Starmaker wrote:
Volney wrote:
On 7/21/2023 6:44 PM, Sylvia Else wrote:
On 21-July-23 3:15 am, The Starmaker wrote:
News • University
Stanford president resigns over manipulated research, will retract at >> least three papers
Marc Tessier-Lavigne failed to address manipulated papers, fostered >> unhealthy lab dynamic, Stanford report says
https://stanforddaily.com/2023/07/19/stanford-president-resigns-over-manipulated-research-will-retract-at-least-3-papers/
investigation found “manipulation of research data.”
"The report concluded that the fudging of results under
Tessier-Lavigne’s purview “spanned labs at three separate institutions.”
It identified a culture where Tessier-Lavigne “tended to reward the >> ‘winners’ (that is, postdocs who could generate favorable results) and
marginalize or diminish the ‘losers’ (that is, postdocs who were >> unable or struggled to generate such data).”
"For several papers worthy of retraction to have been principally
authored by the same scientist represents “unusual frequency of
manipulation of research data and/or substandard scientific
practices,” "Â Â Â (pattern of racketteering)
""In the report, the scientific panel raised questions about
allegations of fraud in a major 2009 Alzheimer’s study that claimed to
have found the cause of neurodegeneration in Alzheimer’s patients and
was publicly called “the most important discovery in Alzheimer’s in
 the last 20 years, maybe ever” by former Genentech executive Richard
Scheller.""Â Â (follow the money)
"...contain doctored imagery..."
https://stanforddaily.com/2023/07/19/stanford-president-resigns-over-manipulated-research-will-retract-at-least-3-papers/
https://boardoftrustees.stanford.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/5/2023/07/Scientific-Panel-Final-Report.pdf
'If the facts don't fit the theory, change the facts.' -Albert Einstein
He never said that.
The facts didn't fit Starfarter's theory so he changed the facts.
I didn't change the facts.
Fact number one: This link points to a book that reads:
The Ultimate Quotable Einstein
By Albert Einstein
https://books.google.com/books?id=A32-DwAAQBAJ&printsec=frontcover&dq=editions:tNFoVCjXVqkC&hl
Fact number two: copyright by The Hebrew University of Jerusalem and Princeton University.
Fact number three: The quote is in the book! see page 483
https://books.google.com/books?id=A32-DwAAQBAJ&pg=PA483&dq=%27#v=onepage&q&f=false
On Sunday, July 23, 2023 at 10:24:18 AM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote:The most negative "scientist" ever with the highest negative IQ, was Albert Einstein. But he does make sense as a theologian for boosting Jewish metaphysics, threatened by sanatana or eternal dharma.
The Starmaker wrote:
Volney wrote:
On 7/21/2023 6:44 PM, Sylvia Else wrote:
On 21-July-23 3:15 am, The Starmaker wrote:
News • University
Stanford president resigns over manipulated research, will retract at
least three papers
Marc Tessier-Lavigne failed to address manipulated papers, fostered >> unhealthy lab dynamic, Stanford report says
https://stanforddaily.com/2023/07/19/stanford-president-resigns-over-manipulated-research-will-retract-at-least-3-papers/
investigation found “manipulation of research data.”
"The report concluded that the fudging of results under
Tessier-Lavigne’s purview “spanned labs at three separate institutions.”
It identified a culture where Tessier-Lavigne “tended to reward the
‘winners’ (that is, postdocs who could generate favorable results) and
marginalize or diminish the ‘losers’ (that is, postdocs who were
unable or struggled to generate such data).”
"For several papers worthy of retraction to have been principally >> authored by the same scientist represents “unusual frequency of >> manipulation of research data and/or substandard scientific
practices,” "Â Â Â (pattern of racketteering)
""In the report, the scientific panel raised questions about
allegations of fraud in a major 2009 Alzheimer’s study that claimed to
have found the cause of neurodegeneration in Alzheimer’s patients and
was publicly called “the most important discovery in Alzheimer’s in
 the last 20 years, maybe ever” by former Genentech executive Richard
Scheller.""Â Â (follow the money)
"...contain doctored imagery..."
https://stanforddaily.com/2023/07/19/stanford-president-resigns-over-manipulated-research-will-retract-at-least-3-papers/
https://boardoftrustees.stanford.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/5/2023/07/Scientific-Panel-Final-Report.pdf
'If the facts don't fit the theory, change the facts.' -Albert Einstein
He never said that.
The facts didn't fit Starfarter's theory so he changed the facts.
I didn't change the facts.
Fact number one: This link points to a book that reads:
The Ultimate Quotable Einstein
By Albert Einstein
https://books.google.com/books?id=A32-DwAAQBAJ&printsec=frontcover&dq=editions:tNFoVCjXVqkC&hl
Fact number two: copyright by The Hebrew University of Jerusalem and Princeton University.
Fact number three: The quote is in the book! see page 483
Oh look, Einstein had something to say about you!https://books.google.com/books?id=A32-DwAAQBAJ&pg=PA483&dq=%27#v=onepage&q&f=false
“I’m a magnet for all the crackpots in the world, but they are of interest to me, too. A favorite pastime of mine is to reconstruct their thinking processes. I feel genuinely sorry for them, that’s why I try to help them.”
– Albert Einstein
The Starmaker wrote:
Volney wrote:
On 7/21/2023 6:44 PM, Sylvia Else wrote:
On 21-July-23 3:15 am, The Starmaker wrote:
News • University
Stanford president resigns over manipulated research, will retract at >> least three papers
Marc Tessier-Lavigne failed to address manipulated papers, fostered >> unhealthy lab dynamic, Stanford report says
https://stanforddaily.com/2023/07/19/stanford-president-resigns-over-manipulated-research-will-retract-at-least-3-papers/
investigation found “manipulation of research data.”
"The report concluded that the fudging of results under
Tessier-Lavigne’s purview “spanned labs at three separate institutions.”
It identified a culture where Tessier-Lavigne “tended to reward the >> ‘winners’ (that is, postdocs who could generate favorable results) and
marginalize or diminish the ‘losers’ (that is, postdocs who were >> unable or struggled to generate such data).”
"For several papers worthy of retraction to have been principally
authored by the same scientist represents “unusual frequency of
manipulation of research data and/or substandard scientific
practices,” "Â Â Â (pattern of racketteering)
""In the report, the scientific panel raised questions about
allegations of fraud in a major 2009 Alzheimer’s study that claimed to
have found the cause of neurodegeneration in Alzheimer’s patients and
was publicly called “the most important discovery in Alzheimer’s in
 the last 20 years, maybe ever” by former Genentech executive Richard
Scheller.""Â Â (follow the money)
"...contain doctored imagery..."
https://stanforddaily.com/2023/07/19/stanford-president-resigns-over-manipulated-research-will-retract-at-least-3-papers/
https://boardoftrustees.stanford.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/5/2023/07/Scientific-Panel-Final-Report.pdf
'If the facts don't fit the theory, change the facts.' -Albert Einstein
He never said that.
The facts didn't fit Starfarter's theory so he changed the facts.
I didn't change the facts.
Fact number one: This link points to a book that reads:
The Ultimate Quotable Einstein
By Albert Einstein
https://books.google.com/books?id=A32-DwAAQBAJ&printsec=frontcover&dq=editions:tNFoVCjXVqkC&hl
Fact number two: copyright by The Hebrew University of Jerusalem and Princeton University.
Fact number three: The quote is in the book! see page 483
https://books.google.com/books?id=A32-DwAAQBAJ&pg=PA483&dq=%27#v=onepage&q&f=false
Now, let's go back to
Fact #1: The Ultimate Quotable Einstein By Albert Einstein
Doesn't the words ( By Albert Einstein) mean Albert Einstein is the author of the book entittled:
The Ultimate Quotable Einstein By Albert Einstein?
Fact #2 The Hebrew University of Jerusalem and Princeton University certaintly should know better than anyone else.
Fact #3 IT'S IN THE FUCKING BOOK!!!!
https://books.google.com/books?id=A32-DwAAQBAJ&pg=PA483&dq=%27#v=onepage&q&f=false
ALBERT EINSTEIN IS THE FUCKING AUTHOR!!!
https://books.google.com/books?id=A32-DwAAQBAJ&pg=PA483&dq=%27#v=onepage&q&f=false
Where did you people go to skool, Stanford University????
Fudging University!
'If the fudging don't fit the fudge, fudge the fudging.'
People of the 'scientific community' like Sylvia Else and Volney are just parrots that repeat misinformation.
People in the 'scientific community' are not even interested in the ...facts.
Just as a Parrot is not interested in what it repeats...it's just making noise.
Now, if The Hebrew University of Jerusalem and Princeton University is publishing misinformation, I would like to hear about that.
But look at the people who publish these books...Fudging Universities and Gangster Religions.
--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
the unchallengeable.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 507 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 209:15:45 |
| Calls: | 9,969 |
| Files: | 13,828 |
| Messages: | 6,357,938 |